Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN:
MEASURING LIFT AND DRAG FORCES ON AN
AIRFOIL
Summary..................................................................................................................1
Introduction..............................................................................................................4
Theoretical Background...........................................................................................5
Experimental Results.............................................................................................11
Analysis of Data....................................................................................................12
Conclusion.............................................................................................................13
References..............................................................................................................14
Appendix A: Data.................................................................................................15
Figure 2: Airfoil......................................................................................................5
PAGE 3 OF 23
Pitot tube Airfoil
Test Apparatus
Airfoil
PAGE 4 OF 23
Theoretical Background
There are various times that fluid flow over solid bodies occurs in
practice, and it is responsible for numerous physical phenomena,
including drag and lift forces that act upon an airfoil. In order for
engineers to better understand these forces wind tunnels were created
for simulation. In 1871, the first wind tunnel was designed by Francis
H. Wenham and built by John Browning of the Aeronautical Society of
Great Britain at the Penns Marine Engineering Works at Greenwich,
England. The wind tunnel was 12 feet long and an 18-inch square and
utilized a steam-powered fan to drive the air through the duct to the
test section where the model airfoil would be placed. Since this first
experiment wind tunnels have been used in multiple industries to
simulate fluids flowing over solid bodies in order to gain a stronger
understanding of fluid principles at work. When an airfoil is placed in
the test section the relationships between various parameters can be
determined. The main parameters of concern for an airfoil are fluid
velocity, airfoil shape, and angle of attack (figure 2). In the
aeronautical industry wind tunnels are utilized to study the two main
forces acting on airfoils, lift and drag. Drag is the component of
aerodynamic force parallel to the relative wind velocity while lift is the
vertical component of aerodynamic force relative to wind velocity.
PAGE 5 OF 23
Figure 2: Airfoil
The total drag force is the result of friction along the surface of
the airfoil and pressure difference between the leading and trailing
regions around the airfoil.
Dtotal=D f +D p
The equation that shows the friction component of the drag force
and the pressure component are as follows,
where Dturb, L is the drag force induced over the total length due
PAGE 6 OF 23
Equation 3: Pressure Drag Force
V 2
D p=C d A
2
Dtotal
C d ,total =
1 2
V A
2
PAGE 7 OF 23
The lift force is the force perpendicular to the flow direction, and
is the force which enables airplanes to fly. This force results from
viscous and pressure forces and like drag has the same factors which
affect its value. However, with airfoils the effects from the viscosity
are usually negligible since airfoils are streamed lined bodies, this will
leave only the pressure as the main force acting on the airfoil. When
there is a pressure difference between the top and bottom surfaces of
the airfoil the lift force will occur. Airfoils are designed in a way that
their shape will cause the air flow to increase in velocity as it flows
over the top which, from Bernoulli equation, will cause the pressure to
decrease.
Fl
Cl =
1 2
V A
2
chord length and wing span, V is the velocity, Fl is the lift force,
PAGE 8 OF 23
Design, Implementation, and Conduction of
Experiment
To study the lift and drag forces on an airfoil an apparatus was
built based on a design by Martin Morris and Scott Post of Bradley
University. The intension of the design is to be cost effective and easy
to fabricate and added to any wind tunnel. The apparatus uses two
load cells, an Arduino Uno, and is constructed from aluminum. This
simple design enables the study of lift and drag to be done with
minimal resources.
PAGE 9 OF 23
Micro-Controller
Load
Cell
Servo Motor
PAGE 10 OF 23
1.1 Procedure Outline
2. Place the apparatus at the end of the wind tunnel with only the
airfoil and support rod in the flow stream.
A. Recording the initial value of the load cells using the serial
monitor in the Arduino IDE
PAGE 11 OF 23
8. Turn on the wind tunnel blower motor.
10. Record the Pitot tube voltage from the Multi-meter at this
motor speed.
11. Record the values from the load cells for the generated lift
(LoadA) and drag (LoadB) at that motor speed.
PAGE 12 OF 23
Experimental Results
The following tables present the results obtained from
performing this experiment. Other data can be found in appendix b.
20
10 Hz Hz 30 Hz 40 Hz 50 Hz 60 Hz
.0001 .001 .0098 .1472
0 N N N N .5984 N .9025 N
.0001 .001 .3237
5 N N .157 N N .6475 N .981 N
10 .0001 .001 .4905 1.3047
N N .157 N N .981 N N
15 .0001 .001 .3237 .8142 1.3047 1.7952
N N N N N N
20 .0001 .001 .3237 1.4715
N N N .981 N N 2.119 N
Table 1: Lift Force (N)
10 20 30 40 50
Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz 60 Hz
0.00 0.00 0.04 0.34 0.86 0.863
0 24 95 28 63 60 0
0.00 0.00 0.68 0.76 0.93 0.938
5 24 95 51 18 70 1
1 0.00 0.00 0.68 1.15 1.41 1.247
0 24 95 51 42 96 6
1 0.00 0.00 1.41 1.91 1.88 1.716
5 24 95 30 60 81 7
2 0.00 0.00 1.41 2.30 2.12 2.026
0 24 95 30 85 95 2
Table 2: Coefficient of Lift
20 30 40 50 60
10 Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz
.0001 .001
0 N N .01 N .01 N .15 N .15 N
.0001 .001
5 N N .01 N .01 N .29 N .29 N
10 .0001 .001
N N .01 N .15 N .29 N .29 N
15 .0001 .001
N N .01 N .15 N .29 N .45 N
20 .0001 .001
N N .01 N .15 N .6 N .6 N
PAGE 13 OF 23
Table 3: Drag Force (N)
10 Hz 20 Hz 30 Hz 40 Hz 50 Hz 60 Hz
0.015 0.061 0.277
0 5 3 1 0.1494 1.3779 0.9105
0.013 0.054 0.246
5 8 6 5 0.1329 2.4514 1.6198
10 0.011 0.046 0.209
7 3 2 1.6915 2.0804 1.3747
15 0.009 0.037 0.167
3 1 3 1.3532 1.6644 1.6863
20 0.007 0.070 0.708 10.620 43.191 43.191
1 8 1 9 5 5
Table 4: Coefficient of Drag
PAGE 14 OF 23
Analysis of Data
From the obtained data, it is shown that as the fluid velocity
increases there is also an increase in the lift and drag forces. At lower
angles of attack, less than 10 degrees, the lift coefficient also increases
with increasing fluid velocity. However, as the angle of attack
increases to 10 degrees and above the lift coefficient begins to
decrease at increasing fluid velocity. It is also seen that when the
angle of attack increases the coefficient of lift also increases for all
fluid velocity.
2.0000
10 Hz
20 Hz
1.5000
30 Hz
Coefficient of Lift 40 Hz
1.0000
50 Hz
60 Hz
0.5000
0.0000
0 5 10 15 20 25
Angle of Attack
PAGE 15 OF 23
To improve the reliability of the test apparatus the machined
parts need to be more carefully finished. The airfoil profile could also
be redesigned and 3-D printed to improve the quality of the
experiment data. Doing these will decrease the uncertainty of the
results because since the test apparatus will be stronger and able to
more accurately transfer the lift and drag forces to the load cells.
Adjusting the wind tunnel configuration could increase the wind
velocity which would provide greater range of results for the lift and
drag forces. The current maximum wind velocity is approximately 11
m/s which is a low velocity for effectively studying airfoils and the
forces acting upon them. Lastly, more sensitive load cells are needed
for this experiment to accurately measure the forces acting on the
airfoil.
Conclusion
Although this experiment was able to obtain data for the lift and
drag forces it regrettably did not produce satisfactory results due to
multiple factors. One factor that impeded the experiment was the time
it took to plan the apparatus, purchase the needed materials and have
them delivered, and finally fabricating the apparatus. Another factor
was the lack of a sensitive load cell that could adequately measure the
small changes in the lift and drag forces. There was also the factor of
not having the time to apply a statistical analysis to support the
validity and consistency of the results. Although the results were
compared to textbooks and published studies, with only one set of test
data no strong correlation can be concluded.
PAGE 16 OF 23
that of other lift and drag experiments. This will also allow for the
calibration of the load cells to be refined so they more accurately
measure the forces being applied. If the issues discussed are corrected
the experiment will allow for a more complete process so the results
can be validated against other studies.
PAGE 17 OF 23
References
Cengel, Y. A., & Cimbala, J. M. (2010). Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals
and Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
https://kcts9.pbslearningmedia.org/asset/nv37_int_liftanddrag/
http://www.mpoweruk.com/flight_theory.htm
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/space/lift-drag.html
PAGE 18 OF 23
Appendix A: Data
Fan Voltag Delta Wind
HZ e P Velocity
10 0.111 2.76 Pa 2.15 m/s
20 0.28 6.97 Pa 3.41 m/s
15.43
30 0.62 Pa 5.07 m/s
28.62
40 1.15 Pa 6.91 m/s
46.53
50 1.87 Pa 8.81 m/s
70.42
60 2.83 Pa 10.83 m/s
Table 5: Fluid Velocity
Cross
Sectional Area
0 .002295 m^2
5 .00258 m^2
10 .00304 m^2
15 .0038 m^2
20 .005016 m^2
25 .00578 m^2
30 .00654 m^2
Table 7: Airfoil Area
PAGE 19 OF 23
Fluid Velocity vs. Coefficient of Lift
2.5000
2.0000
1.5000
0 Degrees
Coefficient of Lift 5 Degrees 10 Degrees 15 Degrees 20 Degrees
1.0000
0.5000
0.0000
10 Hz 15 Hz 20 Hz 25 Hz 30 Hz 35 Hz 40 Hz 45 Hz 50 Hz 55 Hz 60 Hz
Angle of Attack
PAGE 20 OF 23
Appendix B: Arduino Code
float ReadingA_Strain1 = 29.0;
float LoadA_Strain1 = 0.0; // (grams)
float ReadingB_Strain1 = 41.0;
float LoadB_Strain1 = 200.0; // (grams)
float ReadingA_Strain2 = 27.0;
float LoadA_Strain2 = 0.0; // (grams)
float ReadingB_Strain2 = 41.0;
float LoadB_Strain2 = 200.0; // (grams)
void setup() {
Serial.begin(9600); // setup serial baudrate
}
void loop() {
float newReading_Strain1 = analogRead(0); // analog in 0 for
Strain 1
float newReading_Strain2 = analogRead(1); // analog in 1 for
Strain 2
// Calculate load by interpolation
float load_Strain1 = ((LoadB_Strain1 - LoadA_Strain1) /
(ReadingB_Strain1 - ReadingA_Strain1)) * (newReading_Strain1 -
ReadingA_Strain1) + LoadA_Strain1;
float load_Strain2 = ((LoadB_Strain2 - LoadA_Strain2) /
(ReadingB_Strain2 - ReadingA_Strain2)) * (newReading_Strain2 -
ReadingA_Strain2) + LoadA_Strain2;
PAGE 21 OF 23
time = millis();
}
}
PAGE 22 OF 23