Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Assessment type, weighting and LOs tested by this assessment indicated in the shaded area above by a
Important requirements (Delete where appropriate, if other please provide detail)
Mode of Working: individual
Presentation Format: assignment
Method of Submission: Electronic submission
Mark required to pass this coursework: 50%
(Complete following detail)
Hand in date & time
Date & method by which you
will receive feedback
Written feedback 4 weeks after submission
Do clearly state your student number when submitting work but do not indicate your name.
Always keep a copy of your work.
Always keep a file of working papers (containing, for instance, working notes, copied journal article
and early drafts of your work, etc.) that show the development of your work and the sources you have
used. You may need to show this to tutor at some point so notes should be clear and written in
English. This is an important requirement. There may be circumstances where it is difficult to arrive
at a mark for your work. If this is so you may be asked to submit your file within 3 working days and
possibly meet with your tutor to answer questions on your submission.
1 | Page A s s e s s m e n t B r i e fi n g f o r S t u d e n t s
Assessments are subject to a word limit to ensure consistency of approach across all
modules. Your work should not exceed the limit indicated (excluding references and
appendices). Do not feel that you have to achieve this word count in your work. What is
important is that the work satisfies the stated learning outcomes which are articulated through
the assessment criteria (see following page).
Care is taken to ensure that work has been marked correctly. Checks are conducted by both
a second lecturer and an independent expert from outside the University on batches of work.
Your work will not be returned to you but you will receive detailed feedback explaining how
your mark has been arrived at and how your work could have been improved upon.
Always use the Harvard style referencing system. The Universitys Learning Information
Services have produced a series of guides covering a range of topics to support your studies
and develop your academic skills including a guide to Harvard referencing
Expensive or elaborate bindings and covers for submissions are not required in most
instances. (Refer to guidelines however in the case of dissertations).
The Business School has a policy of anonymous marking of individual assessments which
applies to most modules. You should not identify yourself directly in the work you submit and
you may need to use phrases such as the author of this assignment .in the detail of your
submission.
2 | Page A s s e s s m e n t B r i e fi n g f o r S t u d e n t s
You have been appointed as a Marketing Consultant. In this role you are required to prepare a three-year
marketing plan for The Ski Club in the UK market
Task 1. You are required to produce a summary of an environmental appraisal analysis for the company, The
Ski Club in the U.K. market. - LO1 (20% weighting).
Task 2. Identify two new target markets appropriate to the company, The Ski Club in the U.K. market. This
must include full justification of the target markets, customer profiling and positioning LO2 (35% weighting).
Task 3.Develop differentiated marketing mixes for each target market identified in part 2 (above). This must
include marketing objectives and control sections for each mix. All recommendations must be fully justified
LO2, LO3 (45% weighting)
Assessment Criteria
The module Learning Outcomes tested by this assessment task are indicated on page 1. The precise
criteria against which your work will be marked is as follows:
Performance descriptors
Performance descriptors indicate how marks will be arrived at against each of the above criteria. The
descriptors indicate the likely characteristics of work that is marked within the percentage bands indicated.
1. Summary of environmental appraisal analysis LO1 (20% weighting) for The Ski
Club in the U.K. market.
70+% An excellent analysis of the internal and external environments using a range of
appropriate analytical tools and evidence.
60-69& Evidence of a very good analysis of the internal and external environment that
provides a very good basis for the development of a marketing plan.
55-59% Demonstrates a sound analysis providing a solid insight into the organisation and
3 | Page A s s e s s m e n t B r i e fi n g f o r S t u d e n t s
its external environment.
0-39% Fails to meet the criteria. Insufficient, incomplete or inappropriate use of analytical
tools and supporting evidence.
2. Identification of two new target markets appropriate to the company, The Ski Club, in the U.K.
market. This must include full justification of the target markets, customer profiling and positioning
LO2 (35% weighting)
70% + Clear evidence of an excellent ability to successfully identify target markets and
then provide a comprehensive justification, customer profile and positioning
statement for each one.
60-69% Evidence of a very good ability to successfully identify target markets and then
provide a good justification, customer profile and positioning statement for each
one.
55-59% Evidence of a solid ability to identify target markets and then provide an
appropriate justification, customer profile and positioning statement for each one.
50-54% Some evidence of an ability to identify target markets and then provide satisfactory
justification, customer profile and positioning statement for each one. Partial in its
treatment and possibly lacking independent thought and creativity.
40-49% Poor identification of target markets that is lacking in soundly based justification,
customer profiling and positioning statement. Poor ability to utilise the findings
from the analysis in identifying appropriate target markets.
55-59 Evidence of a solid ability to synthesise theoretical frameworks, models and tools into
practice, resulting in the development and appropriate justification of differentiated
marketing mixes for each target market (including objectives and control mechanisms).
4 | Page A s s e s s m e n t B r i e fi n g f o r S t u d e n t s
50-54% Some evidence of an ability to synthesise theoretical frameworks, models and tools into
practice, resulting in the development and justification, albeit limited, of satisfactory
differentiated marketing mixes for each target market (including objectives and control
mechanisms).
0-39% Fails to meet the criteria. Insufficient ability to synthesise theoretical frameworks, models
and tools in practice, resulting in an incomplete and inappropriate development and
justification of marketing mixes for each target market.
5 | Page A s s e s s m e n t B r i e fi n g f o r S t u d e n t s