Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN
CURRENCY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Answers to Questions
1. The two major issues related to the translation of foreign currency financial statements are:
(a) which method should be used and (b) where should the resulting translation adjustment
be reported in the consolidated financial statements. The first issue relates to determining
the appropriate exchange rate (historical, current, or average for the current period) for the
translation of foreign currency balances. Those items translated at the current exchange
rate are exposed to translation adjustment. The second issue relates to whether the
translation adjustment should be treated as a gain or loss in income, or should be deferred
as a separate component of stockholders equity.
2. Balance sheet exposure arises when a foreign currency balance is translated at the current
exchange rate. By translating at the current exchange rate, the foreign currency item in
essence is being revalued in U.S. dollar terms on the consolidated financial statements.
There will be either a net asset balance sheet exposure or net liability balance sheet
exposure depending upon whether assets translated at the current rate are greater or less
than liabilities translated at the current rate. Balance sheet exposure generates a
translation adjustment which does not result in an inflow or outflow of cash. Transaction
exposure, which results from the receipt or payment of foreign currency, generates foreign
exchange gains and losses which are realized in cash.
3. Although balance sheet exposure does not result in cash inflows and outflows, it does
nevertheless affect amounts reported in consolidated financial statements. If the foreign
currency is the functional currency, translation adjustments will be reported in stockholders
equity. If translation adjustments are negative and therefore reduce total stockholders
equity, there is an adverse (inflationary) impact on the debt to equity ratio. Companies with
restrictive debt covenants requiring them to stay below a maximum debt to equity ratio,
may find it necessary to hedge their balance sheet exposure so as to avoid negative
translation adjustments being reported. If the U.S. dollar is the functional currency or an
operation is located in a high inflation country, remeasurement gains and losses are
reported in income. Companies might want to hedge their balance sheet exposure in this
situation to avoid the adverse impact remeasurement losses can have on consolidated
income and earnings per share.
The paradox in hedging balance sheet exposure is that, by agreeing to receive or deliver
foreign currency in the future under a forward contract, a transaction exposure is created.
This transaction exposure is speculative in nature, given that there is no underlying inflow
or outflow of foreign currency that can be used to satisfy the forward contract. By hedging
balance sheet exposure, a company might incur a realized foreign exchange loss to avoid
an unrealized negative translation adjustment or unrealized remeasurement loss.
4. The gains and losses arising from financial instruments used to hedge balance sheet
exposure are treated in a similar manner as the item the hedge is intended to cover. If the
foreign currency is the functional currency, gains and losses on hedging instruments will be
taken to other comprehensive income. If the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, gains
and losses on the hedging instruments will be offset against the related remeasurement
gains and losses.
The major concept underlying the current rate method is that the entire foreign investment
is exposed to foreign exchange risk. Therefore all assets and liabilities are translated at
the current exchange rate. Balance sheet exposure under this concept is equal to the net
investment.
6. The Retained Earnings balance is created by a multitude of transactions: all revenues,
expenses, gains, losses, and dividends since the companys inception. Identifying each
component of this account (so that a separate translation can be made) would be virtually
impossible. Therefore, in the initial year that Statement 52 was applied, the ending
balance calculated under Statement 8 was merely brought forward. Thereafter, the ending
balance translated each year for retained earnings becomes the beginning figure to be
reported for the following year.
7. The major differences relate to non-monetary assets carried at historical cost and related
expenses, i.e., inventory and cost of goods sold; property, plant, and equipment and
depreciation expense; and intangible assets and amortization expense. Under the temporal
method, these items are all translated at historical exchange rates. Under the current rate
method, the assets are translated at the current exchange rate and the related expenses
are translated at the average exchange rate for the current period.
8. The functional currency is the currency of the subsidiarys primary economic environment.
It is usually identified as the currency in which the company generates and expends cash.
SFAS 52 recommends that several factors such as the location of primary sales markets,
sources of materials and labor, the source of financing, and the amount of intercompany
transactions should be evaluated in identifying an entitys functional currency. SFAS 52
does not provide any guidance as to how these factors are to be weighted (equally or
otherwise) when identifying an entitys functional currency.
9. The foreign subsidiary's net asset position in foreign currency at the beginning of the
period is first determined. Changes in net assets are determined to explain the net asset
balance in foreign currency at the end of the period. The beginning net asset position and
changes in net assets are translated at appropriate exchange rates and the ending net
asset position in dollars is determined.
The ending net asset balance in foreign currency is then translated at the current rate and
this result is subtracted from the ending net asset position in dollars (already calculated).
The difference is the translation adjustment. It is positive if the actual dollar net asset
position is less than the net asset position based on the current exchange rate. The
translation adjustment is negative if the actual dollar net asset position is greater than if
translated at the current rate.
1. C
2. C
3. C
4. B Since the peso is the functional currency, the financial statements must be
translated using the current rate method. Therefore, answers a and d can
be eliminated. Because the subsidiary has a net asset position and the
peso has appreciated from $.16 to $.19, a positive translation adjustment
will result.
5. A All asset accounts are translated at current rates.
6. A Since the foreign currency is the functional currency, a translation is
required. All assets accounts are translated at current rates.
7. C Since the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, a remeasurement is
required. All receivables are remeasured at current rates. Assets carried at
historical cost, such as prepaid insurance and goodwill, are remeasured at
historical rates.
8. B The foreign currency is the functional currency, so a translation is
appropriate. All assets (including inventory) are translated at the current
exchange rate [100,000 x $.17].
9. C Cost of goods sold is translated at the exchange rate in effect at the date
of accounting recognition, which is the date the goods were sold [100,000
x $.18].
10. D The foreign currency is the functional currency, so a translation is
appropriate. All assets are translated at the current exchange rate of $.19.
11. C The U.S. dollar is the functional currency, so a remeasurement is
appropriate. Inventory (carried at cost) is remeasured at the historical
exchange rate of $.16. Marketable equity securities (carried at market
value) are remeasured at the current exchange rate of $.19.
12. C Beginning inventory FCU 200,000 x $1.00 = $ 200,000
Purchases 10,300,000 x $0.80 = 8,240,000
Ending inventory (500,000) x $0.75 = (375,000)
Cost of goods sold FCU 10,000,000 $8,065,000
25. (30 minutes) (Prepare financial statements for a foreign subsidiary and then
translate them into U.S. dollars)
Fenwicke Company Subsidiary
McGraw-Hill/Irwin The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 8/e 10-7
Income Statement
LCU U.S. Dollars
Rent revenue 60,000 x $1.90 A = $114,000
Interest expense (10,000) x $1.90 A = (19,000)
Depreciation expense (14,000) x $1.90 A = (26,600)
Repair expense (4,000) x $1.85*H = (7,400)
Net income 32,000 $ 61,000
* Repairs is the only expense which is not incurred evenly throughout the
year.
Statement of Retained Earnings
LCU U.S. Dollars
135,000 271,000
Increase in cash 41,000 78,600
Effect of exchange rate change on cash (4,800)
Cash, 1/1 -0- -0-
Cash, 12/31 41,000 x $1.80 C = $ 73,800
Balance Sheet
December 31, 2007
Goghs U.S. Dollars
Cash 44,000 x 1/.65 = 67,692
Receivables 116,000 x 1/.65 = 178,462
Inventory 58,000 x 1/.65 = 89,231
Fixed Assets (net) 339,000 x 1/.65 = 521,538
Total 557,000 856,923
Liabilities 176,000 x 1/.65 = 270,769
Common Stock 120,000 x 1/.48 = 250,000
Retained Earnings 261,000 above 467,131
Translation Adjustment (130,977)
Total 557,000 856,923
Translation Adjustment Goghs U.S. Dollars
Net assets, 1/1/07 336,000 x 1/.60 = 560,000
Net income, 2007 71,000 above 114,066
Dividends paid (26,000) above (41,935)
Net assets, 12/31/07 381,000 632,131
Net assets at current exchange rate,
12/31/07 381,000 x 1/.65 = 586,154
Translation adjustment, 2007 (negative) 45,977
Cumulative translation adjustment, 1/1/07 (negative) 85,000
Cumulative translation adjustment, 12/31/07 (negative) 130,977
Entry *C
Investment in Simbel..................................................... 38,244
Retained earnings, 1/1/08......................................... 38,244
To accrue 2007 increase in subsidiary book value (see Schedule 1). Entry is
needed because parent is using the cost method.
Entry S
Common Stock (Simbel) ................ 72,000
Add'l Paid-in-capital (Simbel)............ 45,000
Retained earnings, 1/1/08 (Simbel)... 38,244
Fixed assets (revaluation) ................ 9,000
Investment in Simbel ................ 164,244
To eliminate subsidiary's stockholders' equity accounts and allocate the
excess of purchase price over book value to land (fixed assets).
The excess of cost over book value is calculated as follows:
Purchase price..................................................... $126,000
Book value, 1/1/07...............................................
Part I (c). U.S. dollar is the functional currencytemporal method (no long-
term debt)
Exchange
KCS Rate US$
Sales 25,000,000 0.035 875,000
Cost of goods sold (12,000,000) Sched.A (493,500)
Depreciation expenseequipment (2,500,000) Sched.B (118,000)
Depreciation expensebuilding (1,800,000) Sched.C (85,200)
Research and development expense (1,200,000) 0.035 (42,000)
Other expenses (1,000,000) 0.035 (35,000)
Income before remeasurement loss 6,500,000 101,300
Remeasurement loss, 2008 - (92,000)
Net income 6,500,000 9,300
Retained earnings, 1/1/08 500,000 given (147,000)
Dividends paid, 12/15/08 (1,500,000) 0.031 (46,500)
Retained earnings, 12/31/08 5,500,000 (184,200)
3. With the FC as functional currency, the U.S. dollar net income reflected in the
consolidated income statement is $315. If the U.S. dollar were the functional
currency, the amount would be twice as much$630. The amount of total
assets reported on the consolidated balance sheet is 23.4% smaller than if the
U.S. dollar were functional currency [($3,940 $3,192)/$3,192].
The relations between the current ratio, the debt to equity ratio, and profit
margin calculated from the FC financial statements and from the translated
U.S. dollar financial statements are shown below.
Profit margin
NI 700 630 315
Sales 5,000 2,250 2,250
0.14 0.28 0.14
Return on equity
NI 700 630 315
Average TSE 3,550 1,915 1,541
0.19718 0.32898 0.20441
Inventory turnover
COGS 3,000 1,360 1,350
Average Inventory 1,000 430 380
3 3.16279 3.55263
These results show that the temporal method distorts all ratios as calculated
from the original foreign currency financial statements. The current rate
method maintains all ratios that use numbers in the numerator and
denominator from the balance sheet only (current ratio, debt-to-equity ratio)
or the income statement only (profit margin). For ratios that combine
numbers from the income statement and balance sheet (return on equity,
inventory turnover), even the current rate method creates distortions.
The U.S. dollar amounts reported under the temporal method for inventory
and fixed assets reflect the equivalent U.S. dollar cost of those assets as if
the parent had sent dollars to the subsidiary to purchase the assets. For
example, to purchase FC 6,000 worth of fixed assets when the exchange rate
was $.50/FC, the parent would have had to provide the subsidiary with
$3,000.
The U.S. dollar amounts reported under the current rate method for inventory
McGraw-Hill/Irwin The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 8/e 10-33
and fixed assets reflect neither the equivalent U.S. dollar cost of those
assets nor their U.S. dollar current value. By multiplying the FC historical
cost by the current exchange rate, these assets are reported at what they
would have cost in U.S. dollars if the current exchange rate had been in
effect when they were purchased. This is a hypothetical number with little, if
any, meaning.