The Cultural Impact of Sasanian Persia

along the Silk Road

Aspects of Continuity1
e-Sasanika 14
Michael Alram 2015
Austrian Academy of Sciences
Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna

My paper focuses on the Sasanian Empires impact on its surrounding world and
explores the question of why its cultural achievements had such a long-lasting influence far
beyond the borders of the Iranian lands, even after the decline of the dynasty. This relates to
the role of the Sasanians in international trade and their political aim of controlling the land
and maritime trade networks that connected Iran with the Mediterranean world, Central Asia,
China, India, and the Arabian Peninsula.
These land and maritime trade networks subsumed under the term Silk Road, a
romantic notion which was coined in the 19th century and is still very popular today. However,
the scholarly concept of the Silk Road as trade routes connecting China with Rome and
Byzantium often neglects or underestimates the important role that the Persian Empires played
in this political and cultural interaction between East and West.2 We should also not forget that
the primary aim of all participants in this power game was not to enable merchants to transport
silk which incidentally was just one of the many trade goods that were transported from east
to west or vice versa or to enable pious monks to travel from China to India, but to extend
and secure their political influence, facilitate and expedite communication between
administrative units, and to move troops from one point to another as quickly as possible.
Although I agree with my colleague Khodadad Rezakhani that the Silk Road stricto sensu never
existed,3 I would not go so far as to eliminate the notion of the Silk Road from our scholarly
concepts, for it has become a synonym for cross-cultural interaction and attracts public interest
on our academic endeavours; it is, however, vital that we clearly define what we are talking
about!
Trade connections between Central Asia and the Mediterranean world go back to the
third millennium BCE, when for example the precious lapis lazuli and tin-bronze from
Afghanistan was sent to Troy.4
In the middle of the first millennium BCE, the Persians created the first world empire
in history, uniting Asia Minor, Mesopotamia, Egypt, Libya, Arabia, as well as parts of Central
Asia and India, under their kingship.5 It was the Achaemenid system of administration and
infrastructure that paved the way for the astonishing economic prosperity of the empire, while
facilitating lively cultural exchange between the various satrapies.6

1
This article is the enlarged version of a paper presented at a conference organized by the Abegg-Foundation,
Riggisberg (Switzerland) in September 2011.
2
Rezakhani 2011.
3
Rezakhani 2011.
4
Pernicka 2001.
5
Wiesehfer 1993, pp. 25-148.
6
Briant 2012.
 In the social relations between the Achaemenid king and the members of his court, gifts
played an important role in expressing the kings gratitude for loyalty and services rendered. A
famous example of this is the Persian and Median dress as described in Greek literature which
had to be worn at court and indicated the rank of the bearer according to its colour and quality.
In addition, weapons, golden jewellery, and vessels made of precious metals were used as royal
gifts and became status symbols for their owners.7 In return, the king also received gifts from
his subjects, which were presented on special festive occasions.8
With the Macedonian king Alexander the Great and his successors the Seleucids, the
Greco-Bactrians, and the Indo-Greek kings Greek language and culture was disseminated
across the Iranian world as far as Central Asia and northwest India.
In the core of the Iranian lands, on the Iranian plateau and Mesopotamia, the Greek
Seleucids were displaced by the Parthians, Iranian nomads from the Central Asian steppes, who
penetrated into Seleucid territory before the middle of the third century and finally conquered
Mesopotamia with its capital Seleucia in 141 BCE. With the conquest of Mesopotamia the
Parthians also became a serious threat to the Roman Empire, which had succeeded the
Seleucids in the Eastern Mediterranean.9
Although the Parthians or Arsacids were very much attracted by Greek culture, they
also revered their Iranian heritage. Under their rule, which lasted until the beginning of the 3rd
century CE, life in Iran and Mesopotamia was characterized by economic prosperity and
vibrant cultural exchange between the Iranian, Greek, and Semitic populations. In international
trade, the semi-independent caravan cities such as Hatra and Palmyra occupied the most
prominent positions. The wealth of their population is reflected in the monumental architecture
of official and private buildings as well as in the sculptures and funerary monuments which
served to express the elites rank and status.10
Astonishing evidence of international trade relations in the first century CE was
discovered by French archaeologists in 1937 outside the eastern borders of the Parthian Empire,
in Begram, an ancient settlement 80 km north of Kabul on the southern fringes of the Hindu
Kush. At that time, the ancient province of Paropamisadae, in which Begram was situated, was
already under the rule of the rising Kushan dynasty. This treasure, which was interpreted as
being part of some commercial stock, was stored in two rooms and included among other
artifacts carved Indian ivories (some of which may also have been locally produced), Roman
glassware from Egypt and Syria and lacquerware from the Chinese Han dynasty period. 11
The evidence provided by the Begram treasure is complemented by the exceptional
findings from Tillya Tepe, a necropolis of nomadic aristocrats situated outside the north-eastern
border of the Parthian Empire in the western corner of ancient Bactria and dating to the second
half of the first century CE. Besides the breathtaking golden artifacts which follow mainly
nomadic traditions but also reflect Hellenistic and Indian influences in their visual vocabulary,
the tombs contained a Chinese mirror, an Indian gold medallion, Parthian silver coins, a golden
imitation of a Parthian silver drachm, and one Roman aureus of emperor Tiberius (1437).12
These items derive partly from the same stock as those found at Begram and shed light on the
fascinating interaction between the nomadic world and the sedentary population.
At the beginning of the third century the Arsacids were challenged by a local dynasty
which had ruled as petty kings in Fars in southwest Iran for more than 400 years. Fars was the
homeland of the Achaemenids, and its local aristocracy had already achieved a certain degree

7
Wiesehfer 2010a, pp. 514-515.
8
Pfisterer 2000, pp. 85-89.
9
Wiesehfer 1993, pp. 163-204.
10
For Hatra cf. Sommer 2003; for Palmyra cf. Hartmann 2001.
11
Mehendale 2008; Cambon 2008.
12
Sarianidi 2008; Schiltz 2008.
of independence from the Seleucids which it maintained under Parthian rule.13 On their coins,
the kings of Fars presented themselves like their Achaemenid predecessors as adherents of the
Zoroastrian religion, and in contrast to their Parthian overlords, who inscribed their coins
mainly in Greek, the kings of Fars used Middle Persian as their official language. In a way they
felt themselves to be the true heirs of the Persian tradition and regarded their Parthian overlords
as dishonourable apostates, unworthy to rule the land of the Aryans. The leader of this revolt
was a certain Ardashir, who made himself king of Fars (fig. 1) and eventually killed the Parthian
king of kings Artaban IV in battle, an incident that is supposed to have taken place in the year
223/24.14

Figure 1: Silver drachm of Ardashir I as king of Fars, after 205/6-224. Private

Collection.

To legitimize his rule Ardashir developed the politico-religious concept of an Aryan

and Mazdaist nation that was based on an invention of a tradition or a myth whose roots
lay in the distant past. 15 It was a reference, on the one hand, to the glorious but obscure
Achaemenid past and, on the other, to the religious tradition of Zoroastrianism. The monarchy
and religion were to be the cornerstones of the new Sasanian state from that time on.16
The kings had superhuman qualities; they were of divine origin and descended from
the gods. This is clearly expressed by the title that Ardashir (figs. 2 and 3) created for his
concept of kingship: mazdsn bay Ardar hnh rn k ihr az yazdn the Mazdean
Lord Ardashir, king of kings of the Aryans/Iranians whose lineage (image / brilliance) is from
the gods.17
The divine descent of the king whom the gods had chosen to reign over Iran also became
a prominent topic for the empires discourse through visual language. One of the
most magnificent examples of Sasanian rock art is without doubt Ardashirs investiture relief
at Naqsh-i Rustam near Persepolis which was executed in the final decade of his reign. The
king is depicted as the mirror image of the supreme god Ohrmazd, who is handing Ardashir a
diadem, the symbol of the right to rule (fig. 4).

13
Wiesehfer 1994 and Wiesehfer 2007; Klose / Mseler 2008; Curtis 2010.
14
Alram / Gyselen 2003, pp. 135-152.
15
Gnoli 1989.
16
Wiesehfer 1993, pp. 205-295 and Wiesehfer 2010b.
17
Panaino 2004, pp. 556-564; Soudavar 2006; Skjrv 2007.
i

Figure 2: Silver drachm of Ardashir I (224-240) as King of Kings. Vienna,

Kunsthistorisches Museum, inv. no. MK_OR_6379.

Figure 3: Silver drachm of Ardashir I (224-240) as King of Kings; on the kings tiara
a falcon with a diadem in his peak. Vienna, Kunsthistorisches Museum, inv.
no. MK_ OR_6379.

Figure 4: Relief of Ardashir I at Naqsh-i Rustam (1), showing his investiture by

Ahura Mazda, after 228/29 CE (Photo M. Alram).
 Ardashirs son, Shapur I (fig. 5), is best known for his victories over the Romans which
he had immortalized in five monumental rock reliefs (fig. 6). He also extended the royal title
from hnh rn to hnh rn ud Anrn, i.e. king of kings of the Iranians and Non-
Iranians. This new title represented a further step in the dynastys efforts to create a distinct
Iranian identity. For Shapur, Anrn primarily stood for those countries he had been able to
conquer from the Romans. Thereafter it might also have assumed a religious connotation,
differentiating between those who followed the right religion (i.e. Zoroastrianism) and those
who did not.18

Figure 5: Silver drachm of Shapur I (240-272). Vienna, Kunsthistorisches Museum,

inv. no. MK_OR_2184.

Figure 6: Relief of Shapur I at Naqsh-i Rustam (6), showing his triumph over the
Roman emperors Philip the Arab and Valerian, after 260 CE (Photo M.
Alram).

From the beginning of the fifth century onwards we can observe a change in the royal
ideology: new titles such as rmahr (he who maintains peace in his dominion), kay

18
Huyse 1999, II, p. 11; Drayaee 2009, p. 5; Wiesehfer 2010b, p. 146.
(Kayanid) instead of hnh, or the form xwrrah abzot (increased the glory) reveals an
increasing affinity with the mythical Kayanid kings in the Avesta as ancestors of the royal
lineage.19
The xwrrah or Divine Glory was an essential element of legitimacy and divine
sanction in the royal Iranian ideology. It distinguishes the king from any other human being
and gives him the right to rule. In the visual arts the xwrrah was expressed in multiple ways
from the Achaemenids to the post-Caliphate period: a pair of wings, a falcon (fig. 3), a ram
with flying ribbons (fig. 7), pearl roundels or a halo around the kings head were all interpreted
as signs of Divine Glory.20

Figure 7: Stucco panel showing a rams head above a pair of wings; diadems with
long ribbons are tied around the neck and the wings, 5th century CE.
Chicago, The Field Museum of Natural History, inv. no. 228840 (Cat.
Brussels 1993, p. 149, no. 8).

As Boris Marshak has pointed out, the Senmurv, a composite creature, also stood for
the royal xwrrah and symbolized prosperity.21 We find it for example on the precious robe of
king Khusro II at Taq-i Bustan (figs. 8 and 9) and as a favoured emblem on silver vessels (fig.
10). A similar concept can be seen in the image of a pheasant holding a necklace in its beak
(fig. 11). Such necklaces were worn by the King of Kings and were part of the royal insignia.
The crowns of the Sasanian kings played a special role in this context, which can be
seen as representations of the kings xwrrah.22 Each Sasanian king wears his own individual
crown, which consists of a diadem tied with ribbons at the neck, to which different theophoric
emblems are attached. 23 A characteristic feature is the korymbos on the top of the head,
originally a bunch of hair, covered with a thin veil. Over the course of time from their coinage,

19
Panaino 2004, pp. 556-562; Daryaee 2009, pp. 24 and 34.
20
Soudavar 2003, pp. 1-39.
21
Marshak 1998.
22
Panaino 2004, pp. 571-572.
23
Erdmann 1951.
we know at least of 31 Sasanian kings the composition of the crowns became ever more
complicated as a variety of different emblems were used and their individual characteristics
diminished (cf. figs. 2, 3, 5, 12 and 13).

Figure 8: Hunting scenes on the side wall of the niche at Taq-i Bustan with Khusro II
(Photo M. Alram).

Figure 9: Senmurv on Khusros II robe at Taq-i Bustan (Photo M. Alram).

Figure 10: Silver-gilt dish with a Senmurv, 7th / 8th century. London, The British
Museum, inv. no. BM 124095 (Cat. Brussels, pp. 220-221, no. 71).

Figure 11: Silver-gilt dish with a pheasant holding a necklace in his peak, St.
Petersburg, Hermitage Museum, inv. no. S-18 (Cat. Brussels 1993, p. 217,
no. 69).
 Figure 12: Silver drachm of Khusro II (591-628), 25th regnal year, mint of Hamadan.
Private Collection.

Figure 13: Silver drachm of Khusro II (591-628), 37th regnal year. Vienna,
Kunsthistorisches Museum, inv. no. MK_ OR_7264.

The crowns which were made of gold and silver and were decorated with pearls and
precious stones became so heavy that the kings were no longer able to wear them. It is supposed
that from the time of Khusro I (531579) they were suspended on a golden chain in the throne
room above the throne at a height where they just brushed the monarchs head. The crown of
Khusro II (591628) is said to have been made of pure gold and had a weight equivalent to 60
men (figs. 12 and 13). When Ctesiphon was conquered by the Arabs in 637, Khusros crown
was sent to Caliph Umar, who had it hung in the Kaaba in Mecca.24 The custom of the hanging
crown was also adopted in Byzantine court ceremonial as reported by Benjamin de Tudela,
who visited the palace of Emperor Manuel I Comnenus (11431180) in Constantinople around
1170.25
The image of Khusro II with his prominent crown is also present on the so-called Arab-
Sasanian silver coinage issued by the Arab governors after the downfall of the Sasanian Empire.
Only the name of the governor or the caliph was inscribed beside Khusros bust and on the
margin the formula bismillah (in the name of God) was added in Arabic (fig. 14). This only
changed with the reform of Abd al-Malik (685705) in 77 AH (696/97) when the Sasanian
model was replaced by purely Islamic iconography. 26
However, more than 150 years later, the Abbasid caliph al-Mutawakkil (847861)
revived the Sasanian iconography when he commemorated his victory over the camel-mounted

24
Erdmann 1951, pp. 114-115 with further references.
25
Erdmann 1951, p. 117. However, it is still unclear how far the Sasanian court ritual has influenced the Roman
one, cf. Canepa 2009.
26
Gaube 1973.
Bigah tribe in Sudan on a silver medallion (fig. 15).27 The Buyid Amir Rukn ad-Dawla (c. 935
976) used the Sasanian model for his depiction on a gold commemorative medallion from the
year 970 / AH 359, choosing the old Sasanian title may the Shahanshahs xwrrha increase.28

Figure 14: Silver drachm of Abdallah ibn al-Zubair (680-692), 63 Higra (=682 CE),
mint of Darabgird. Vienna, Kunsthistorisches Museum, inv. no. MK_
OR_6988.

Figure 15: Silver medallion of al-Mutawakkil (847-861), 241 Higra (=855 CE).
Vienna, Kunsthistorisches Museum, inv. no. MK_ OR_7283.

During the ninth and tenth centuries, the epic stories of the Persian heroes and kings
had already become an integral part of Islamic civilization and the various dynasties of Iranian
origin who succeeded in seizing power in the former Sasanian realm, although observing the
Islamic faith and being more or less Arabized, attempted to revive the glory of the Iranian past
and linked their lineage to that of their Sasanian predecessors.29 The Buyids (9301062) chose
Wahram (V) Gur (420438) as the dynastys ancestor, while the lineage of the Samanids (819
1005) was traced back to Wahram (VI) Chobin (590591). Both these Sasanian monarchs are
very popular figures in the Persian epics.30
It was mainly the extraordinary splendour and luxurious lifestyle of the Sasanian kings,
their courtiers, and the aristocracy that attracted the surrounding world, as well as the Arab
conquerors, who partly adopted and reshaped the Sasanian cultural heritage in various ways,
thus ensuring its long legacy in Islamic times.31

27
Ilisch 1984/85, pp. 16-17, no. 5; Alram 2009, no. 27b.
28
Miles 1964; Ilisch 1984/85, p. 33, no. 20; Treadwell 2003.
29
Wiesehfer 1993, pp. 297-305;
30
Bosworth 1973; Bosworth 2009; Pourshariati 2010.
31
Cf. Cat. Brussels 1993 with further references.
 The most typical and impressive elements of the Sasanians cultural heritage included
the magnificent palaces (fig. 16) and manor houses, richly decorated with stucco, mosaics, and
carpets; the huge hunting grounds in which all kinds of animals were gathered to serve the
kings pleasure in the chase (figs. 8 and 17); the precious silverware produced both at the royal
court and in the provincial workshops of the local aristocracy (figs. 10-11, 17, 18, 20). Another
legendary feature was the royal banquets, where all kinds of luxury dishes, wine, and other
drinks were served while the king and his courtiers were entertained with music and various
games (fig. 18).32 These banquets at court constituted an important part of the social interaction
between the king and his nobles and were also intended to express the empires high level of
prosperity. 33 The king as a glorious heroic hunter as well as the banquet scenes became
prominent topics in the visual arts of the empire, and like the Persian epics, continued to be
highly popular during the Muslim era.

Figure 16: Ardashir Is palace at Firuzabad (Photo M. Alram).

A prominent image of Sasanian court art which has quite a long-lasting influence is the
depiction of the enthroned king as cosmocrator (figs. 19 and 20). It underlines the superior and
divine role of the king on earth and shows him as the guarantor of the cosmic order created by
Ohrmazd, the supreme god. The person of the king was linked to the sun and the moon, as
reported by Ammianus Marcellinus (17, 5, 3), who quotes a letter which Shapur II had sent to
Emperor Constantius II in which Shapur calls himself particeps siderum, frater solis et lunae.
In this context it should also be mentioned that the Sasanians regarded the Byzantine emperors
as their brothers and compared the latter and themselves to the two luminaries, the sun and the
moon.34

32
Melikian-Chirvani 1992; Daryaee 2009, pp. 50-52.
33
Daryaee 2009, p. 51.
34
Panaino 2004; Brm 2010, pp. 190-191 with further references.
Figure 17: Silver-gilt plate with Ohrmazd II hunting lions, 4th century CE. Cleveland
Museum of Art, acc. No. 62.150.

Figure 18: Silver-gilt dish with king seated on a banqueting couch accompanied by
servants and musicians, 7th / early 8th century (St. Petersburg, Hermitage
Museum, inv. no. S-47 (Cat. Brussels 1993, p. 210, no. 64).
 Figure 19: Gold, rock-crystal, and glass bowl with enthroned king, 6th century CE.
Paris, Bibliothque nationale de France, Dpartment des Monnaies,
mdailles et antiques.

Figure 20: Silver-gilt plate from Qazvin with enthronement scene, 7th century CE.
Tehran, National Museum of Iran, inv. no. 904 (Cat. Vienna 2000, pp.
284-286, no. 156).

In foreign policy, the Sasanians faced the problem of having to secure their borders
against Rome (later Byzantijum), their archenemy, on the one side, and against charging
Central Asian nomads on the other. In late Antiquity, this strategic dilemma was also shared by
Rome/Byzantium. Both superpowers sought to avoid war on multiple fronts and, therefore,
engaged their adversaries in accordance to this strategy. 35 The Sasanians had to deal
predominantly with the Romans, the succeeding Byzantine state, the Huns, and the Western
Turks, both on the battlefield and in the diplomatic theater. Behind the political game of
constantly changing alliances, there were tangible economic interests in controlling the flow of
trade to and from China and India, whether by sea or by land.
When Ardashir I seized power from his Parthian overlord Artaban IV, it became clear
that, from the very beginning, his strategy was to increase Sasanian influence in all surrounding
regions and thus try to expand the territory of the empire beyond the old borders of the Parthian
state.
In the west, Ardashir I was successful in conquering Nisibis, Carrhae, as well as Hatra,
and thus, strengthened the Sasanians position against the Romans, their archenemies, in
northern Mesopotamia. The conquest of Armenia, however, occurred only later under the reign
of his son and successor, Shapur I, in 252 CE. Ardashirs eastern campaign took him deep into
Central Asia, and the city of Marw (in todays Turkmenistan) was to become a key strategic
position in the northeast of the Sasanian Empire, controlling the crossroads leading from
Central Asia to the Iranian plateau and Mesopotamia. In conquering al-Bahrain, Ardashir
finally gained control of the sea routes that linked the Persian Gulf to India.36
If we believe Shapur Is inscription on the Kaaba-i Zardusht, which dates to around or
after 260 CE, the territory of the Sasanian Empire stretched from northern Mesopotamia and
Armenia in the west to Peshawar in the east and from Kashgar in the north to Oman in the
south.37 Thus, the Sasanians established themselves as the leading force in the Near East, the
Iranian plateau, western Central Asia, and the western half of the Indian Ocean world. There
were of course military and political backlashes throughout the 400 years of Sasanian rule,
which resulted in territorial concessions to Rome/Byzantium in Mesopotamia, or to the Huns
and Western Turks in Central Asia and northwest India.38 The Sasanians, however, succeeded
in maintaining their position as one of the leading world powers of their time.
Despite political crises, the Sasanian monetary system, which was based on the silver
drachm, proved to be considerably stable and indicates a well-organized administrative system
and prudent economic policies. 39 Mints were distributed throughout the empire, thereby
ensuring the local supply. Via land and maritime trade routes, Sasanian coinage reached Central
Asia, the Arabian Peninsula, India, Ceylon, and China. In Central Asia, the Sasanian drachm
became the model for numerous local coinage systems, among them those of the Huns and
Western Turks.40 Even the new Arab rulers held on to the Sasanian drachm for half a century
before creating their own coinage. The crowned image of the Sasanian "King of Kings"
together with the fire altar a symbol of the Zoroastrian religion and of the royal fire lit at the
ascension of each king became a universally valued trademark which remained largely
unchanged for centuries.
Sasanian economy was mainly based on agriculture, handicrafts, and interregional
trade. Military excursions in neighboring countries, however, were also important economic
41

factors which extracted all sorts of resources, including knowledge and manpower, in the form
of deportations to the Iranian heartlands.42 The importance of long-distance trade for the overall

35
Howard-Johnston 2010.
36
Alram / Gyselen 2003, pp. 135-152; Alram 2007.
37
Huyse 1999, I, 2-3.
38
Howard-Johnston 2010.
39
Schindel 2013.
40
Vondrovec 2014.
41
Rezakhani 2010; Daryaee 2011.
42
Kettenhofen 1996; Morony 2004b; Rezakhani 2010, pp. 50-56
economy was not high and merchants belonged to the lowest stratum of the Sasanian social
system.43 On the other hand, the demand for luxury goods for the royal household and the local
aristocracy must have been enormous, and could not have been satisfied by local goods and
production. For this reason, the Sasanians aimed to provide the necessary security to enable
merchants to journey safely via land and sea. Moreover, the tax for importing and exporting
goods constituted a welcomed income for the kings coffers.
To ensure Sasanian predominance in the sea trade to India and further east the control
of both coasts along the Persian Gulf was vital. As Ammianus Marcellinus (22, 6, 11) reports,
the towns and harbours along the Gulf were already prospering by the 4th century. On the
Persian side, the island of Kharg, the Bushihr peninsula, and the city of Siraf further south were
important entrepots.44
Another Sasanian stronghold for controlling the sea routes to India was the province of
Sind, located at the mouth of the Indus river (in present-day Pakistan), close to the Khatiawar
peninsula, which was one of the main trading centres on Indias west coast. The location of
Sind was also crucial for trade via the Indus from Gandhara downstream to the Indian Ocean.
The importance of Sind for the Sasanians is underlined by the fact that Shapur II (309379)
opened a mint in that area for striking exclusively gold coins, a practice that continued until
the reign of Peroz (459484). 45 The location of the mint is unknown. It might have been
situated in the port of Daibul (which can probably be identified with the site of Banbhore)
which according to Tabari46 Wahram V (421438) had received as dowry from his wife, an
Indian princess. This, however, remains pure speculation for the time being.
It has been suggested that Nestorian merchants might have played a leading role in the
Persian sea trade with India in connection with the missionary activity of the Nestorian church
of India and beyond, which was pursued by the Nestorian metropolitan of Rev Ardashir in
Fars.47 Referring to the situation in the early sixth century, Cosmas Indicopleustes, another
member of the Nestorian church, states that Persian Nestorians had a strong community on
Taprobane (Ceylon) which was one of the main transhipment centres for traded goods between
China, India, the Persian Gulf, Yemen, and Ethiopia.
According to Procopius (I, 20), the Sasanians tried to block all Asiatic trade connections
for the Byzantines, which finally induced the emperors Justin (518527) and Justinian (527
565) to force the Axumite king to intervene. In 524/25, the Axumites occupied Yemen and tried
to break the Sasanians predominant trading position in the Indian Ocean. However, the
Axumites success was of short duration, as Khusro I (531579) threw them out again and
installed a Sasanian governor who also controlling the entrance to the Red Sea.48
It is still unclear whether Persian merchants ever had direct contact with China via
maritime routes, or if Chinese ships ever reached the Persian Gulf.49 The literary sources are
somewhat difficult to interpret and the archaeological evidence is meagre. It is certain that
Sasanian goods reached China by sea, but it is unknown whether Persian merchants transported
them. A striking find in this context is a hoard of Sasanian drachms of Peroz which was
discovered in Suikai (Guandong) in southern China.50 This hoard, which was probably buried
in the first half of the sixth century, also contained a silver vessel bearing a Sogdian inscription

43
Daryaee 2009, pp. 42-50; Rezakhani 2010, pp. 42-47; Daryaee 2011, p. 404.
44
Whitehouse / Williamson 1973; for Persian Gulf trade in late antiquity see also Daryaee 2003 and Daryaee 2011,
pp. 405-408 with further references.
45
Schindel 2004, III/1, pp. 507-509; III/2, pl. 145.
46
Nldeke 1879, p. 108.
47
Whitehouse / Williamson 1973, pp. 42-43, 47-48; Gropp 1991; Baum / Winkler 2003.
48
Tabari, p. 227-237. Cf. Bosworth 1983, pp. 604-608; Potts 2010, pp. 37-44.
49
Whitehouse / Williamson 1973, 45-49; for the presence of Persian merchant Diasporas in the Indian Ocean see
Morony 2004a; cf. also Daryaee 2003 and Daryaee 2011, pp. 407-409.
50
Thierry 1993, p. 95, no. 52 and pp. 104-106.
mentioning that its owner came from Chach (Tashkent).51 Chinese scholars have taken this as
a possible clue that Sogdians may have joined Persian merchants who traded directly with
southern China via the sea route. Be as it may, it was not until the end of the 8th or the early 9th
century that direct sailing from the Persian Gulf to China became standard practice, not least
to supply the Abbasids court in Baghdad with silk and other luxury goods.52
As mentioned above, Shapur I claimed in his inscription on the Kaaba-i Zardusht that
the Sasanians also conquered great parts of Central Asia, as far as Kashgar, which is rather an
exaggeration. Sasanian expansion into Central Asia is closely connected with the still unsolved
question as to when the Sasanians overthrew the Kushan Empire which under Kanishka I and
his son Huvishka had stretched from Bactria deep into middle India. The Kushan Empire was
one of the most powerful empires of its time, playing a leading role in international trade and
cultural exchange between Central Asia, Iran, and India.
The various Sasanian military excursions into Central Asia eventually resulted in the
temporary occupation of Bactria, which was put under the rule of princes, most probably from
the royal family of the King of Kings. On their coins, they used the title of king of the Kushan
or even king of kings of the Kushan. The Sasanian presence in Bactria is also documented
by the recently discovered rock relief of Rag-i Bibi, although it is still unclear who the depicted
king is.53 Finally, we should mention the Bactrian documents deriving from the archive of the
local kings of Rob, whose kingdom was situated in the northern part of the Hindu Kush.54
These documents are of utmost importance for Bactrias local history and show that the
Sasanians succeeded in maintaining their rule in Bactria with a number of interruptions until
the devastating defeat of Peroz against the Hunnic Hephthalites in 484 CE. 55 South of the
Hindu Kush, in the Kapisa/Kabul area and further east in Gandhara, the Sasanians presence
had already ended by the last quarter of the 4th century, when Shapur III lost these territories to
two other Hunnic peoples, the Kidarites, and the Alkhans.56
Although Sasanian rule in Bactria came to an end, as we have seen, by the end of the
th
5 century only Khusro I was able to re-establish Sasanian power for a short period after 560
CE the influence of Sasanian culture and lifestyle on Central Asia was fairly strong. North of
Bactria, in Sogdiana the region of Samarkand and the valleys between the Amu Darya and
Syr Darya Sasanian culture was adapted and transformed by the local elite, but the various
Hunnic tribes followed by the Western Turks, who held sway over Sogdia from the late 4th
century onwards, were also influenced by Iranian traditions. Huns and Turks participated in
this lively cultural exchange, encouraged international trade between Iran, Central Asia, India
and China, and profited highly from it.
A key position in these trade activities was played by the Sogdian merchants, who
seemed to have inherited this role from the Kushan traders, developing a network of merchant
communities along the main routes between Sogdiana, India and China.57 That the Sogdians
were also involved in the Indian trade is documented by hundreds of rock inscriptions along
with petroglyphs discovered by a Pakistani-German research expedition in the Upper Indus
valley. The Sogdian inscriptions are concentrated in the area of Shatial, the furthest point
downstream with rock carvings and, seemingly, the final destination of the Sogdian merchants,
where they met and exchanged their goods with their Indian counterparts.58 In the middle of

51
Yoshida 1996.
52
Whitehouse / Williamson 1973, 48-49.
53
Grenet / Lee / Martinez / Ory 2007.
54
Sims-Williams 2000; Sims-Williams 2007.
55
Howard-Johnston 2010, pp. 41-46.
56
Cribb 2010; Alram / Pfisterer 2010.
57
La Vassire 2005; Cat. New York 2001.
58
Sims-Williams 1996.
the 6th century CE the Sogdians, supported by their Turkish overlords, were able to establish
direct trade relations with Byzantium via the northern Caucasus.59
To sum up, the Sogdians became the leading trading community in Central Asia and
were important contributors to the economic and cultural flowering of Transoxiana, which
continued under the Arabs and promoted the early dissemination of Islam in that region.60
The Sasanians seemed to have concentrated their trading activities with the east on the
Indian Oceans maritime routes and tried to exclude the Sogdians from their territories.
Nonetheless, we cannot rule out that Persian and Sogdian merchants formed partnerships at
some time to conduct business more effectively.
To strengthen their position in the East, the Sasanians also sent diplomatic missions to
the Chinese court and, in return, received delegations from the Chinese emperor.61
At the very end, after the defeat of Sasanian troops by the Arabs and the murder of the
last Sasanian King of Kings, Yazdgard III, in 651, the surviving members of the royal family
sought refuge at the court of the Tang emperor.62
However, despite the downfall of the dynasty and the spread of the new religion of
Islam, the Sasanian heritage lived on and has remained an integral part of Iranian identity up
to the present day.

59
Hennig 1933, p. 304-305; Hannestadt 1955/1957; Howard-Johnston 2010, pp. 48-51.
60
Frye 1993.
61
Pulleyblank 1991.
62
Daryaee 2009, pp. 37-38.
 Bibliography

Primary Sources

Ammianus Marcellinus
Edited and translated by Wolfgang Seyfarth, 4 vols. (Berlin 1968-1971).

Cosmas Indicopleustes
Kosmas Indikopleustes, Christliche Topographie. Textkritische Analysen. bersetzung.
Kommentar, Indicopleustoi, Archaeologies of the Indian Ocean 7, ed. by Horst Schneider
(Turnhout 2010).

Procopius
Procopius, Buildings, History of the Wars, and Secret History, ed. by H. B. Dewing und
G. Downey, Loeb Classical Library 7 vols. (Cambridge/MA 191440).

Tabari
Cf. Nldeke 1879

Literature

Abramishvili / Tsotselia 1977

T. Abramishvili and M.V. Tsotselia, Klad sasanidskikh drakhm iz Bolnisi [Hoard of
Sasanian drachms from Bolnisi], in Numizmaticheskii sbornik: posviashchaetsia pamiatni
D.G. Kapanadze (Tbilisi 1977), pp. 150-158.

Alram / Gyselen 2003

Michael ALRAM, Rika GYSELEN, Sylloge Nummorum Sasanidarum, Paris Berlin
Wien, vol. I, Ardashir I. Shapur I. (Vienna 2003).

Alram 2007
Michael ALRAM, Ardashir`s Eastern Campaign and the Numismatic Evidence, in
After Alexander. Central Asia before Islam, Proceedings of the British Academy 133, ed. by
Joe Cribb and Gorgina Herrmann (London 2007), pp. 227-242.

Alram 2009
Michael ALRAM, Mnzen des Mittelalters, in Meisterwerke des Mnzkabinetts,
Kurzfhrer durch das Kunsthistorische Museum, ed. by Sabine Haag (Vienna 2009), pp. 22-
115.

Alram / Pfisterer 2010

Michael ALRAM and Matthias PFISTERER, Alkhan and Hephthalite Coinage, Coins,
Art and Chronology II, The First Millennium C.E. in the Indo-Iranian Borderlands, ed. by
Michael Alram, Deborah Klimburg-Salter, Minoru Inaba and Matthias Pfisterer (Vienna 2010),
pp.13-38.
 Baum / Winkler 2003
Wilhelm BAUM and Dietmar WINKLER, The Church of the East: A Concise History
(London and New York 2003).

Brm 2010
Henning BRM, Herrscher und Eliten in der Sptantike, in Commutatio et contention.
Studies in the Late Roman, Sasanian, and Early Islamic Near East. In memory of Zeev Rubin,
Reihe Geschichte, Band 3, ed. by Henning Brm and Josef Wiesehfer (Dsseldorf 2010), pp.
159-198.

Bosworth 1973
Clifford E. BOSWORTH, The Heritage of Rulership in Early Islamic Iran and the Search
for Dynastic Connections with the Past, Iran, 11 (1973), pp. 51-62.

Bosworth 1983
Clifford E. BOSWORTH, Iran and the Arabs Before Islam, Cambridge History of Iran
3 (1), The Seleucid, Parthian and Sasanian Periods, ed. by Eshan Yarshater (Cambridge 1983),
pp. 593-612.

Bosworth 2009
Clifford E. BOSWORTH, The Persistent Older Heritage in the Medieval Iranian Lands,
The Rise of Islam, The Idea of Iran, vol. 4, ed. by Vesta Sarkhosh Curtis and Sarah Stewart
(London / New York 2009), pp. 30-43.

Briant 2012
Pierre BRIANT, From the Indus to the Mediterranean: The Administrative Organization
and Logistics of the Great Roads of the Achaemenid Empire, Highways, Byways, and Road
systems in the Pre-Modern World, ed. By Susan E. Alcock, John Bodel, and Richard J. A.
Talbert (New York 2012), pp. 185-201.

Cambon 2008
Pierre CAMBON, Begram: Alexandria of the Caucasus, Capital of the Kushan Empire,
in Afghanistan, Hidden Treasures from the National Museum, Kabul, ed. by Frederik Hiebert
and Pierre Cambon (Washington, D.C. 2008), pp. 145-209.

Canepa 2009
Matthew P. CANEPA, The Two Eyes of the Earth. Art and Ritual of Kingship between
Rome and Sasanian Iran (Berkeley 2009).

Cat. Brussels 1993

Splendeur des Sassanides: L `empire perse entre Rome et la Chine (224-642), ed. by
Louis Vanden Berghe and Bruno Overlaet (Brussels 1993).

Cat. New York 2001

Monks and Merchants. Silk Road Treasures from Northwest China, ed. by Annette L.
Juliano and Judith A. Lerner (New York 2001).
 Cat. Vienna 2000
7000 Jahre persische Kunst. Meisterwerke aus dem iranischen Nationalmuseum in
Teheran, ed. by Wilfried Seipel (Vienna 2000).

Cowe 2011
S. Peter COWE, Armenian Hagiography, in The Ashgate Research Companion to
Byzantine Hagiography, Vol. 1, ed. Stephanos Efthymiadis (Farnham, Surrey, England;
Burlington, VT), pp. 299-322.

Cribb 2010
Joe CRIBB, The Kidarites, The Numismatic Evidence. With an Analytical Appendix by
A. Oddy, Coins, Art and Chronology II, The First Millennium C.E. in the Indo-Iranian
Borderlands, ed. by Michael Alram, Deborah Klimburg-Salter, Minoru Inaba and Matthias
Pfisterer (Vienna 2010), pp. 91-146.

Curtis 2010
Vesta SARKHOSH CURTIS, The Frataraka Coins of Persis: Bridging the Gap between
Achaemenid and Sasanian Persia, in The World of Achaemenid Persia, History, Art and
Society in Iran and the Ancient Near East, Proceedings of a Conference at the British Museum
29th September 1st October 2005 ed. by John Curtis and St John Simpson (New York 2010),
pp. 379-394.

Daryaee 2003
Touraj DARYAEE, The Persian Gulf Trade in Late Antiquity, Journal of World History
14 (March 2003), pp. 1-16.

Drayaee 2009
Touraj DARYAEE, Sasanian Persia. The Rise and Fall of an Empire (London / New York
2009).

Daryaee 2011
Touraj DARYAEE, Bazaars, Merchants, and Trade in Late Antique Iran, Comparative
Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 30/3 (2010), pp. 401-409 (Duke University
Press 2011).

Erdmann 1951
Kurt ERDMANN, Die Entwicklung der ssnidischen Krone, Ars Islamica 15/16
(1951), pp. 87-121.

Frye 1993
Richard N. FRYE, Sasanian-Central Asian Trade Relations, Bulletin of the Asia
Institute 7 (1993), pp. 73-77.

Gaube 1973
Heinz GAUBE, Arabosasanidische Numismatik (Braunschweig 1973).

Gnoli 1989
Gherardo GNOLI, The Idea of Iran. An Essay on its Origin, Serie orientale Roma LXII
(Rome 1989).
 Grenet / Lee / Martinez / Ory 2007
Frantz GRENET, Jonathan LEE, Philippe MARTINEZ and Franois ORY, The Sasanian
relief at Rag-i Bibi (Northern Afghanistan), in After Alexander. Central Asia before Islam,
Proceedings of the British Academy 133, ed. by Joe Cribb and Gorgina Herrmann (London
2007), pp. 243-267.

Gropp 1991
Gerd GROPP, Christian maritime trade of Sasanian age in the Persian Gulf in Golf-
Archologie. Mesopotamien, Iran, Kuwait, Bahrein, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate und Oman,
ed. by Klaus Schippmann, Anja Herling and Jean-Franois Salles (Rahden/Westf. 1991), pp.
83-88.

Hannestadt 1955/1957
K. HANNESTAD, Les relations de Byzance avec la Transcaucasie et l`Asie Centrale aux
5ime et 6ime sicles, Byzantion 25-27 (1955-1957), pp. 421-456.

Hartmann 2001
Udo HARTMANN, Das Palmyrenische Teilreich, Oriens et Occidens 2 (Stuttgart 2001).

Hennig 1933
R. HENNIG, Die Einfhrung der Seidenraupenzucht ins Byzantinerreich. Eine Studie
zur Aufklrung der Unklarheiten in den berlieferten Berichten, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 33
(1933), pp. 295-312.

Howard-Johnston 2010
James HOWARD-JOHNSTON, The Sasanians` Strategic Dilemma, in Commutatio et
contention. Studies in the Late Roman, Sasanian, and Early Islamic Near East. In memory of
Zeev Rubin, Reihe Geschichte, Band 3, ed. by Henning Brm and Josef Wiesehfer (Dsseldorf
2010), pp. 37-70.

Huyse 1999
Philipp HUYSE, Die dreisprachige Inschrift buhrs I. an der Kaba-i Zardut (KZ),
Corpus Inscriptionum Iranicarum, III. Pahlavi Texts, 2 vols. (London 1999).

Ilisch 1984/85
Lutz ILISCH, Mnzgeschenke und Geschenkmnzen in der mittelalterlichen
islamischen Welt, Mnstersche Numismatische Zeitung XIV (1984), pp. 7-34; XV (1985), pp.
5-12.

Kettenhofen 1996
Erich KETTENHOFEN, Deportations ii. in the Parthian and Sasanian Periods,
Encyclopaedia Iranica VII, ed. by Eshan Yarshater (Costa Mesa 1996).

Klose / Mseler 2008

Dietrich O. A. KLOSE, Wilhelm MSELER, Statthalter, Rebellen, Knige. Die Mnzen
aus Persepolis von Alexander dem Groen zu den Sasaniden (Mnchen 2008).

La Vassire 2005
tienne DE LA VASSIERE, Sogdian traders: a history (Leiden 2005).
 Marshak 1998
Boris I. MARSHAK, The Decoration of Some Late Sasanian Silver Vessels and its
Subject-Matter, in The Art and Archaeology of Ancient Persia. New Light on the Parthian and
Sasanian Empires ed. by Vesta Sarkhosh Curtis, Robert Hillenbrand and J. M. Rogers (London
/ New York 1998), pp. 84-92.

Mehendale 2008
Sanjyot MEHENDALE, Begram: At the Heart of the Silk Roads, in Afghanistan,
Hidden Treasures from the National Museum, Kabul, ed. by Frederik Hiebert and Pierre
Cambon (Washington, D.C. 2008), pp. 131-143.

Melikian-Chirvani 1992
Assadullah. S. MELIKIAN-CHIRVANI, The Iranian bazm in Early Persian Sources, in
Banquets d`Orient, Res Orientales IV, ed. by Rika Gyselen (Bures-sur-Yvette 1992), pp. 95-
120.

Miles1964
George C. MILES, A Portrait of the Buyid Prince Rukn al-dawlah, American
Numismatic Society Museum Notes XI (1964), pp. 283-293.

Morony 2004a
Michael G. MORONY, Economic Boundaries? Late Antiquity and Early Islam,
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 47 (2004), pp. 166-194.

Morony 2004b
Michael G. MORONY, Population Transfers Between Sasanian Iran and the Byzantine
Empire, in La Persia e Bisanzio. Atti del Convegno internazionale, Roma, 14-18 ottobre 2002
(Rome 2004): pp. 161-179.

Nldeke 1879
Theodor NLDEKE, Geschichte der Perser und Araber zur Zeit der Sasaniden. Aus der
arabischen Chronik des Tabari. bersetzt und mit ausfhrlichen Erluterungen und
Ergnzungen versehen (Leyden 1879).

Panaino 2004
Antonio PANAINO, Astral Characters of Kingship in the Sasanian and Byzantine
Worlds, Convegno internazionale la Persia e Bisanzio (Roma, 14-18 Ottobre 2002), Atti dei
convegni Lincei 201 (Roma 2004), pp. 555-594.

Pernicka 2001
Ernst PERNICKA, Metalle machen Epoche. Bronze, Eisen und Silber, in Troia, Traum
und Wirklichkeit (Stuttgart 2001), pp. 369-372.

Pfisterer 2000
Matthias PFISTERER, Ein Silberschatz vom Schwarzen Meer. Beobachtungen zum
Geldumlauf im Achaimenidenreich, Studia Iranica Cahier 22 (Paris 2000).
 Potts 2010
Daniel POTTS, The Arabian Peninsula, 600 BCE to 600 CE, in Coinage of the
Caravan Kingdoms. Studies in Ancient Arabian Monetization, Numismatic Studies 25, ed. by
Martin Huth and Peter G. van Alfen (New York 2010), pp. 27-64.

Pulleyblank 1991
Edwin G. PULLEYBLANK, Chinese-Iranian relations, i: in pre-Islamic times, in:
Encyclopaedia Iranica V, 4, ed. by Eshan Yarshater (Costa Mesa 1991), pp. 424-431.

Pourshariati 2010
Parvaneh POURSHARIATI, The Parthians and the Production of the Canonical
Shhnmas: Of Pahlavi, Pahlavn and the Pahlav, in Commutatio et contention. Studies in
the Late Roman, Sasanian, and Early Islamic Near East. In memory of Zeev Rubin, Reihe
Geschichte, Band 3, ed. by Henning Brm and Josef Wiesehfer (Dsseldorf 2010), pp. 347-
412.

Rezakhani 2010
Khodadad REZAKHANI, Empires and Micro-Systems: Sasanian Economy 500-700 CE,
unpublished Dissertation, Department of History, University of California (Los Angeles 2010).

Rezakhani 2011
Khodadad REZAKHANI, The Road That Never Was: The Silk Road and Trans-Eurasian
Exchange, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 30/3 (2010), pp.
420-433 (Duke University Press 2011).

Russell 1987
James R. RUSSELL, Zoroastrianism in Armenia, Harvard Iranian Series 5, ed. Ricahrd
N. Frye (Cambridge, MA 1987).

Sarianidi 2008
Viktor I. SARIANIDI, Ancient Bactrias Golden Hoard, in Afghanistan, Hidden
Treasures from the National Museum, Kabul, ed. by Frederik Hiebert and Pierre Cambon
(Washington, D.C. 2008), pp. 211-217.

Schiltz 2008
Vronique SCHILTZ, Tillya tepe, The Hill of Gold: A Nomad Necropolis, in
Afghanistan, Hidden Treasures from the National Museum, Kabul, ed. by Frederik Hiebert and
Pierre Cambon (Washington, D.C. 2008), pp. 219-231

Schindel 2004
Nikolaus SCHINDEL, Sylloge Nummorum Sasanidarum, Paris Berlin Wien, vol. III/1
and III/2, Shapur II. Kawad I./2. Regierung (Vienna 2004)

Schindel 2013
Nikolaus SCHINDEL, Sasanian coinage, in The Oxford Hanbook of Ancient Iran, ed.
by Dan T. Potts (Oxford 2013), pp. 814-840.
 Sims-Williams 1996
Nicholas SIMS-WILLIAMS, The Sogdian Merchants in China and India, in Cina e Iran
da Alessandro Magno alla Dinastia Tang, ed. by Alfredo Cadonna and Lionello Lanciotti
(Firenze 1996), pp. 45-67.

Sims-Williams 2000
Nicholas SIMS-WILLIAMS, Bactrian Documents from Northern Afghanistan I: Legal
and Economic Documents (London 2000).

Sims-Williams 2007
Nicholas SIMS-WILLIAMS, Bactrian Documents from Northern Afghanistan II: Letters
and Buddhist Texts (London 2000).

Skjrv 2007
Prods O. SKJRV, Appendix 3. MAZDSN BAY K IHR AZ YAZDN, in
Michael Alram, Maryse Blet-Lemarquand and Prods O. Skjrv, Shapur, King of Kings of
Iranians and Non-Iranians, Des Indo-Grecs aux Sassanides : donnes pour l`histoire et la
gographie historique, Res Orientales XVII, ed. by Rika Gyselen (Bures-sur-Yvette 2007), pp.
30-37.

Sommer 2003
Michael SOMMER, Hatra. Geschichte und Kultur einer Karawanenstadt im rmisch-
parthischen Mesopotamien (Mainz 2003).

Soudavar 2003
Abolala SOUDAVAR, The Aura of Kings: Legitimacy and Divine Sanction in Iranian
Kingship (Costa Mesa 2003).

Soudavar 2006
Abolala SOUDAVAR, The Significance of Av. ira, OP. ia, MP. ihr, and NP. ehr for
the Iranian Cosmogony of Light, Iranica Antiqua 41 (2006), pp. 151-185.

Thierry 1993
Franois THIERRY, Sur les monnaies Sassanides trouves en Chine, in Circulation des
monnaies, des marchandises et des biens, Res Orientales V, ed. by Rika Gyselen (Bures-sur-
Yvette 1993), pp. 89-139.

Treadwell 2003
Luke TREADWELL, Shhnshh and al-Malik al-Muayyad: The Legitimation of Power
in Smnid and Buyid Iran, in Culture and Memory in Medieval Islam: Essays in Honour of
Wilfred Madelung, ed. by F. Daftary and J. Meri (London / New York 2003), pp. 318-337.
Vondrovec 2014
Klaus VONDROVEC, Coinage of the Iranian Huns and Their Successors from Bactria to
Gandhara: (4th to 8th Century CE), ed. Judith A. Lerner (Vienna 2014).

Whitehouse / Williamson 1973

David WHITEHOUSE and Andrew WILLIAMSON, Sasanian Maritime Trade, Iran XI
(1973), pp. 29-50.
 Wiesehfer 1993
Josef WIESEHFER, Das antike Persien. Von 550 v. Chr. bis 650 n. Chr. (Mnchen /
Zrich 1993).

Wiesehfer 1994
Josef WIESEHFER, Die dunklen Jahrhunderte der Persis, Zetemata, Monographien
zur klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, Heft 90 (Mnchen 1994).

Wiesehfer 2007
Josef WIESEHFER, Fars under Seleucid and Parthian Rule, in The Age of the
Parthians, The Idea of Iran, vol. 2, ed. by Vesta Sarkhosh Curtis and Sarah Stewart (London
2007), pp. 37-49.

Wiesehfer 2010a
Josef WIESEHFER, Gnstlinge und Privilegien am Achaimenidenhof, in Der
Achaiemnidenhof / The Achaemenid Court, Akten des 2. Internationalen Kolloquiums zum
Thema Vorderasien im Spannungsfeld klassischer und altorientalischer berlieferungen,
Landgut Castelen bei Basel, 23.25. Mai 2007, ed. by Bruno Jacobs und Robert Rollinger
(Wiesbaden 2010), pp. 509-530.

Wiesehfer 2010b
Josef WIESEHFER, King and Kingship in the Sasanian Empire, in Concepts of
Kingship in Antiquity, Proceedings of the European Science Foundation Exploratory Workshop
held in Padova, November 28th December 1st, 2007 ed. by Giovanni B. Lanfranchi and Robert
Rollinger (Padova 2010), pp. 135-152.

Yoshida 1996
Yutaka YOSHIDA, Additional Notes on Sims-Williams` article on the Sogdian
Merchants in China and India, in Cina e Iran da Alessandro Magno alla Dinastia Tang, ed.
by Alfredo Cadonna and Lionello Lanciotti (Firenze 1996), pp. 69-78.