Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF AURORA
San Luis

UMIRAY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Umiray, Dingalan, 3207 Aurora

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: ROGELIO V. JUNIO JR. Name of Rater: ROLANDO F. PAJARILLO
Position: Teacher I Position: HEAD TEACHER
Division: Aurora Date of Review:

KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline Weight Performance Indicator Actual Rating Score

per Results
KRA
1. Prepared DLL and Year 10% (5) Have complete and exemplary DLLs with functional IMs.
Lesson Plans of round (4) Have DLL and IMs which are more than expected.
Activities including (3) Prepared prescribed number of DLLs and IMs which are
appropriate, adequate submitted and checked on time. 5 0.5
and updated (2) Have DLLs and IMs but some are not checked.
Instructional Materials. (1) DLLs and IMs not observed.
TEACHING
AND 2. Maintained classroom Year 10% (5) The classroom is conducive for learning and the decoration is
LEARNING Conducive for learning round more informative and also it is conducive for learning.
PROCESS by adding decorations (4) The classroom is conducive for learning.
maintaining its (3) The classroom is clean and decorated
cleanliness. (2) Maintained and decorated but not clean 5 0.5
(1) Did not maintain and decorates the classroom.
 3. Facilitated learning in
the school through
functional DLLs and
Innovative Teaching
strategies
1. Monitored, evaluated
and maintained
pupils/students progress
within the rating period
2. Conducted Quarterly
remediation/enrichment
program to improve the
Pupils/Student
performance of slow
outcomes
learners
3.Prepared question
bank, Periodic Test, Unit
test and Diagnostic test
COMMUNITY 1. Visited parents of Quarterly
INVOLVEMENT learners who need
academic monitoring/
follow up within the
rating period
Year 10% (5) The Teacher established challenging and measurable goal/s for
round student learning that is aligned the k-12 curriculum.
(4) the teacher explained the goal and its appropriateness to students
(3) the teacher clearly communicate a focus for students learning that
is appropriate for students 5 0.5
(2) the teacher did not have a clear focus for students learning
(1) the teacher did not have clear focus for student learning
objectives is to general to guide the DLLs
Year 10% (5) Completed, accurately prepared mechanism to improve students
round outcomes
(4) Assess students more than expected activities
(3) Maintained students records and progress 4 0.4
(2) Assessed students activities
(1) Did not maintained students records and progress
5% (5) With documentations, 100% of the slow learners have improved
performance after using the intervention materials
(4) Prepared ADM materials more than standards with
documentations 1 0.05
(3) Conducted intervention programs without documentations
(2) Prepared ADM but not conducted
(1) Did not prepared ADM
Year 5% (5) TOS is 80% and above prepared for test that require it with test 4 0.4
round analysis
(4) TOS is 75% prepared for test that require it with test analysis
(3) TOS is 70% prepared for test that require it with test analysis
(2) TOS is 50% prepared for test that require it without test analysis
(1) TOS is not prepared
10% (5) Exemplary guidance program activities with mechanism 5 0.5
(4) Conducted guidance program activities more than standard
(3) Conducted selected guidance program activities
(2) Conducted guidance but not documented
(1) Do not have a guidance program
 2. Organized PTA, Class Quarterly 5% (5) Put extraordinary projects with ingenuity, creativity and
and Clubs Organization initiative.
and Meeting (4) Community, Class, Clubs and PTA officials are performing more
than standard
4 0.2
(3) Organized PTA, Class and Clubs Meeting and other community
projects
(2) Class, Club and PTA officers did not perform their duties.
(1) Did not organized any organization
3.Conducted the social Year 5% (5) Put extraordinary projects with initiative, creative and iniquity
mobilization and round (4) Put projects beyond what is expected and standards
networking (3) Put project based on school needs 1 0.05
(2) Put a proposed project but not materialize
(1) Did not put a project
1. Participated and Year 8% (5) Participated or attended seminars for professional growth
attended different round (Regional Level)
seminars or trainings for (4) Participated or attended seminars for professional growth
PROFESSIONAL professional growth (Division Level)
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT (3) Participated or attended seminars for professional growth 5 0.4
(District Level)
(2) Participate or attended seminars for professional growth (School
Level)
(1) Did not participate or attend seminars for professional growth.
2. Innovated teaching Year 2% (5) Introduced an innovative idea in teaching, classroom
strategies, classroom Round management and assessment which was implemented in the District
management and level or in the higher level.
assessment to enhance (4) Introduced at least two innovative ideas in teaching, classroom
learning. management and assessment which were implemented in the school
level.
(3) Introduced an innovative idea in teaching, classroom 1 0.02
management and assessment which was implemented in the school
level.
(2) Introduced an innovative idea in teaching, classroom
management and assessment but was not implemented.
(1) Did not introduce any innovative idea in teaching, classroom
management and assessment.
 3. Earned relevant Year 10% (5) Earned at least 30 units in MA degree
professional trainings, Round (4) Earned at least 27 units in MA degree
earned units or (3) Earned at least 18 units in MA degree 5 0.5
graduated from a higher (2) Earned at least 9 units in MA degree
relevant degree (1) Earned at least 6 units in MA degree
PLUS 1.Served as School Year 5% (5) Administered NCAE with Honesty.
FACTOR Testing Coordinator Round (4) Conducted review for NAT
(3) conducted the orientation on NCAE and NAT. 5 0.25
(2) attended seminar on testing..
(1) did not attend the seminar about testing administration
2. Participated for the Year 5% (5) Won Champion for the search for best classroom District Level
search for the best child Round (4) Won 2nd place for the search for best classroom District Level
and Environment (3) Won 3rd Place for the search for best classroom District Level 5 0.25
Friendly classroom (2) Won 1st place for the search for best classroom School Level
(1) Won 2nd Place for the search for best classroom School Level
OVERALL PERFORMANCE 4.52

ROGELIO V. JUNIO JR ROLANDO F. PAJARILLO

Signature over Printed Name of Ratee Signature over Printed Name of Rater
 PART III SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and
4.14 VERY SATISFACTORY
Objectives

Rater-Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on the content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee Name of Superior

JEPHTHAH T. SAGANIB DANIEL JEROME L. BETE
Signature Signature

Date Date
 PART IV DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS

Resources Needed
Action Plan
Strengths
Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline SOURCE OF
Intervention) FUND HUMAN MATERIALS
FUND
Knowledgeable at Should increase mastery Attend seminars, ask help from BoSY: 2016- 3,000 School/Persona School Head Computer/
basic computer in basic computer colleagues who are 2017 to l Fellow laptop
operations such as operations and have basic knowledgeable on such computer EoSY: 2016- MOOE teachers
word, excel mastery on other operations 2017 Own
complicated computer initiative
operations such as Adobe
Photoshop
Prepare narratives, Should work as expected Make a good filing system to BoSY: 2016- 1,000 school / School Head articles
reports, and beat deadlines make records available at all 2017 to personal own
possible times possible and submit reports EoSY: 2016- initiative
before deadlines. 2017
Monitored, Should maintain Make God work in me to do all BoSY: 2016- Personal School Head
evaluated, and trustworthiness in service school responsibilities with the best 2017 to MOOE Fellow
maintained students and all, regularity in of my ability, no absences EoSY: 2016- teachers
progress within attendance and punctuality, unnecessarily, be punctual in all, 2017
good grooming and maintain good grooming and
rating period
communication improve communication possible.

CERTIFICATION AND COMMITMENT

This is to certify that my competency assessment and development plan has been discussed with me by my immediate April 28, 2016
superior. I further commit that I will exert time and effort to ensure that my individual Development Plan is achieved to agreed JEPHTHAH T. SAGANIB
times. Employee Name & Signature/Date
April 29, 2016
This is to further certify that I have objectively completed the competency assessment of my staff. Furthermore, I commit to
DANIEL JEROME L. BETE
support and ensure that this agreed Individual Development Plan of my staff is achieved according to the agreed times.
Supervisor Name & Signature/Date

I commit to support and ensure that this agreed Individual Development Plan is achieved to the agreed time frames GLORIA B. BUYA-AO
Head of Office Name & Signature/Date