Você está na página 1de 6

Food

Chemistry
Food Chemistry 93 (2005) 665670
www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchem

Hydrolysis of oligosaccharides in soybean our


by soybean a-galactosidase
Simone de Fatima Viana a, Valeria Monteze Guimaraes b, Ines Chamel Jose b,
Maria Goreti de Almeida e Oliveira b, Neuza Maria Brunoro Costa c,
Everaldo Goncalves de Barros b, Maurlio Alves Moreira b,
Sebastiao Tavares de Rezende b,*
a
Faculdade de Medicina de Itajuba, Itajuba, MG 37.502-138, Brazil
b
BIOAGRO, Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Vicosa, MG 36.570-000, Brazil
c
Departamento de Nutricao e Saude -Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Vicosa, MG 36.570-000, Brazil

Received 7 April 2004; received in revised form 28 September 2004; accepted 28 September 2004

Abstract

Ranose oligosaccharides (ROs) make up a substantial part (40%) of the soluble sugars found in soybean seeds and are respon-
sible for atulence after the ingestion of soybean and other legumes. Consequently, soy-based foods would nd a broader approval
if the ROs were removed from soybean products or hydrolysed by a-galactosidases. During soybean seed germination, of content
the ROs decrease substantially, while the a-galactosidase activity increases. a-Galactosidase was partially puried from germinating
seeds by partition in an aqueous two-phase system and ion-exchange chromatography. The enzyme preparation presented maximal
activities against q-nitrophenyl-a-D -galactopyranoside (qNPGal) at 60 C and a pH of 5.0 and the KM app values for qNPGal, mel-
ibiose, and ranose of the enzyme preparation were 0.33, 0.42, and 6.01 mM, respectively. The enzyme was highly inhibited by SDS,
copper, and galactose. Hydrolysis of soybean our ROs by enzyme preparation reduced the stachyose and ranose contents by
72.3% and 89.2%, respectively, after incubation for 6 h at 40 C.
 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: a-Galactosidase; Ranose oligosaccharides; Hydrolyzed soybean our; Flatulence reduction

1. Introduction ivates of sucrose) are the major oligosaccharides associ-


ated with atulence production (De Lumen, 1992). Since
Soybean (Glycine max) is an excellent food and feed monogastric animals and human beings do not have the
source. Soybean diers from grain legumes in its high a-galactosidase enzyme that cleaves the a-1,6 galactosyl
amounts of proteins and due to its well-balanced amino linkage in their digestive tract, the intact oligosaccharide
acid pattern (De, 1971). However, considerable amounts is not absorbed. These oligosaccharides accumulate in
of atulence-causing ranose oligosaccharides (ROs) in the large intestine, where anaerobic microorganisms fer-
soybean-based foods limit their biological value and ment them and lead to atus formation (Steggerda,
acceptability. Ranose and stachyose (a-galactosyl der- 1968). A reduction of the ROs level is therefore highly
desirable, so that soybean could be used as a more
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 31 3899 2374; fax: +55 31 3899
acceptable source of inexpensive proteins. Many at-
2864. tempts have been made to reduce the ROs content in le-
E-mail address: srezende@ufv.br (S.T. de Rezende). gumes by hulling, soaking, cooking, gamma irradiation,

0308-8146/$ - see front matter  2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.09.045
666 S. de Fatima Viana et al. / Food Chemistry 93 (2005) 665670

germination, and microbial or plant a-galactosidase ranose, stachyose and sucrose were assayed for 20
treatments (Guimaraes, De Rezende, Moreira, Barros, min at 37 C using a reaction mixture containing 500
& Felix, 2001; Machaiah & Pednekar, 2002; Mulimani ll of 0.1 mM sodium acetate buer; pH 5.0; 100 ll of
& Devendra, 1998; Sanni, Onilude, & Ogundoye, 1997; enzyme extract; and 400 ll of a 0.1 M substrate solution.
Scalabrini, Rossi, Spettoli, & Matteuzzi, 1998). a-Galac- The produced amount of reducing sugar was determined
tosidase enzymes are widespread in microorganisms, by adding 1 ml of 3,5-dinitrosalicylate reagent according
plants, and animals (Dey & Pridham, 1972). Generally, to Miller (1956). The activities against melibiose, lac-
a-galactosidase can hydrolyze a variety of simple a-D - tose, and maltose were assessed under the same reaction
galactosides as well as more complex molecules, such conditions and substrate concentrations used for ra-
as oligosaccharides and polysaccharides. Soybean a- nose, stachyose, and sucrose. In this case, the glucose
galactosidase has been proposed to reduce ROs in yield was determined by the glucoseoxidase method
soymeal and soymilk (Guimaraes et al., 2001; Porter, (Bergmeyer & Bernt, 1974). The data presented for all
Herrmann, & Ladish, 1990). However, no large-scale a-galactosidase activity determinations are mean values
enzymatic process for this purpose has been carried of triplicate assays, in which the standard deviations al-
out with this enzyme. In the present investigation, the ways lay under 10%.
ROs content and a-galactosidase activity in soybean
seeds were determined during germination and the con- 2.3. Protein determination
ditions for enzymatic ROs hydrolysis by soybean a-
galactosidase tested in soybean our. Protein quantities in the enzymatic extract were
determined by the Coomassie Blue binding method
(Bradford, 1976) with bovine albumin serum as
2. Materials and methods standard.

2.1. Soybean germination conditions, extraction, and 2.4. a-Galactosidase purication


HPLC analysis of soluble sugars
The pre-germinated seeds during 60 h were frozen
Soybean seeds (Glycine max L. Merr. cv. CAC-1) (423 g fresh weight), powdered in a blender, resuspended
were placed on a water-soaked paper lter to germinate in 870 ml of 0.1 M citric acid containing 0.05 M sodium
(Germitest) for 120 h, at 27 C, and then frozen at 20 phosphate with a pH of 5.0, and incubated under agita-
C. Lyophilized soybean seed samples were ground and tion for 1 h at 4 C. The suspension was ltered through
freed from fat with petroleum ether. The soluble sugars cheesecloth and the ltrate centrifuged (15,300g) for 40
of 20 mg seed powder were extracted with 80% aqueous- min at 4 C. The supernatant was used as a crude en-
ethanol (v/v) according to Saravitz, Pharr, and Carter zyme preparation. a-Galactosidase was partially puri-
(1987). The solvent was evaporated at 40 C and the ed by separation on ATPS (Hustedt, Kroner, &
sugars resuspended in 1 ml water, and then analyzed Kula, 1985) followed by ion exchange chromatography.
by HPLC on a Shimadzu series 10A chromatograph. The ATPS preparation was used as described by Gui-
For this purpose, an analytical column [aminopropil maraes et al. (2001) with 12% NaCl. The upper phase
(NH2)] was used, eluted with an acetonitrilewater iso- resulting from the ATPS containing the enzyme was dia-
cratic mixture (70:30 v/v). The individual sugars were lyzed overnight against 50 mM sodium acetate buer,
automatically identied and quantied by comparison pH 4.0, and loaded onto a CM-Sepharose Fast Flow
with the retention periods and standard sugar concen- column (25.5 1.5 cm) equilibrated with 0.1 M sodium
trations. Gentiobiose was used as an internal standard acetate buer, pH 4.0. The proteins were eluted at 4
because it does not interfere with the other sugars and C at a ow rate of 42 ml/h, with a linear gradient
is not found in soybean seeds. formed by 300 ml of the acetate buer and 300 ml of
the same buer containing 0.8 M NaCl. Five-ml frac-
2.2. Enzyme assay tions were collected. Fractions containing a-galactosi-
dase activity were pooled and concentrated by
a-Galactosidase was assayed in a reaction system ultraltration through a PM-30 membrane lter
containing 650750 ll of 0.1 M sodium acetate buer, (Amicon).
pH 5.0; 0100 ll enzyme preparation; and 250 ll of 2
mM q-nitrophenyl-a-D -galactopyranoside (qNPGal) or 2.5. Enzyme characterization
other synthetic substrates. The reaction was run for 15
min at 37 C and stopped by the addition of 1 ml of Kinetic experiments were performed at 37 C and pH
0.5 M sodium carbonate. One enzyme unit (U) was de- 5.0. The MichaelisMenten constant (Km) and the Vmax
ned as the amount of protein required to produce one for substrate hydrolysis were calculated by the Michae-
lmol of q-nitrophenol per min. The activities against lisMenten plot. The substrate concentrations, ex-
S. de Fatima Viana et al. / Food Chemistry 93 (2005) 665670 667

pressed in mM, were 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, the germination period and reached its activity peak after
and 1.5 in the case of qNPGal; 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 4860 h (not shown). These observations conrm that
3.0, and 5.0 for melibiose; and 0.25, 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 5.0, ROs content is reduced during germination by the in-
10.0, and 20.0 for ranose. The eect of ions, simple crease on a-galactosidase activity. ROs degradation
sugars, and reducing agents on the enzyme activity during germination by endogenously synthesized a-
was tested by the standard assay with enzyme samples galactosidase is also well-documented (Guimaraes et al.,
pre-incubated with each of the compounds tested for 2001; Machaiah & Pednekar, 2002; Mansour & Khalil,
15 min at 37 C. 1998; Modi, McDonald, & Streeter, 2000). ROs are
accumulated in soybean seeds during maturation until
2.6. Treatment of soybean our with a-galactosidase desiccation, when all enzymes involved in the ROs syn-
thesis are active. ROs are found in the cotyledons of ma-
Commercial fat-free soybean our was mixed with ture soybeans, located in the cytosol, while hydrolytic
deionized water (1:10 w/v) and the samples (1.2 g) were enzymes such as a-galactosidase are located in the pro-
incubated with 5 U of partially puried a-galactosidase tein bodies. The hydration of seeds during imbibition
for zero, 2, 4, and 6 h under shaking (100 rpm) at 40 C. possibly induces a-galactosidase activity, leading to a
Each reaction mixture was lyophilized and the soluble ROs breakdown, which supplies the germinative energy
sugars were extracted from 30 mg of dried powder with (Herman & Shannon, 1985). Germination improved the
80% aqueous-ethanol (v/v) according to Saravitz et al. nutritive value of legumes due to the formation of en-
(1987). The solvent was evaporated at 40 C and the zymes, including a-galactosidase, which could eliminate
sugars resuspended in 1.2 ml water and analyzed by or reduce the level of anti nutritional factors in seeds.
HPLC as described before. Bau, Villaume, and Mejean (2000) observed that germi-
nation gave rise to a substantial increase in the content
2.7. Properties of soybean our of saponin, oestrogenic compounds, lecithin, and almost
all phytosterols in soybean seeds. On the other hand, the
The amount of protein and oil in commercial soybean duration of the germination process greatly inuences
our were determined by standard Kjeldahl (Associa- the nutritional value and avour of seeds. Germination
tion of Ocial Analytical Chemists, 1975) and Soxhlet may produce undesired compositional changes due to
procedures, respectively. the initiation of metabolic processes and rootlet devel-
opment (Naczk, Amarowicz, & Shahidi, 1997).
Results of the partial purication of a-galactosidase
3. Results and discussion from germinating soybean seeds are summarized in Ta-
ble 1. Most of the a-galactosidase activity present in the
Ranose, stachyose, and sucrose contents in germi- crude seed extract was observed in the upper phase of a
nating seeds decreased from maximum values at the two-phase aqueous system (ATPS). The chromatogra-
beginning of the germination period to very low amounts phy of the resulting ATPS enzyme sample on a CM-
according to the increasing germination time (Fig. 1). Sepharose column indicated out one protein fraction
The fructose content, on the other hand, increased, con- with a-galactosidase activity. Soybean a-galactosidase
rming the hydrolysis of the fructose-containing oligo- was puried 26-fold with a recovery of 25.6% of the en-
saccharides. Accordingly, the a-galactosidase activity zyme activity. No invertase activity was detected in the
against the substrate (q-nitrophenyl-a-D -galactopyrano- nal enzyme preparation.
side) qNPGal in the germinating seeds increased along Substantial activity against qNPGal was observed for
partially puried enzyme preparations in a temperature
range of 4055 C and pH range of 3.56.0 (Fig. 2).
8 1
Maximal substrate hydrolysis by the enzyme was
achieved at 60 C, while the optimum pH was 5.0. These
Content of sucrose and

Content of fructose and

0.8
stachyose (mg%)

6 optimum pH and temperature values are close to those


raffinose (mg%)

0.6 determined for qNPGal hydrolysis: by the partially puri-


4 ed preparation of a-galactosidase from Cassia sericea
0.4 (Mulimani & Devendra, 1998); by the crude preparation
2 of a-galactosidase from germinating soybean seeds
0.2
(Cruz & Silva, 1986) and from germinating guar (Shiv-
0 0
anna, Ramakrishna, & Ramadoss, 1989); and by puri-
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 ed a-galactosidase from soybean seeds (Guimaraes
Germination time (h) et al., 2001).
Fig. 1. Contents (mg%) of ranose (s), stachyose (j), fructose (m), The KM app and Vmax values calculated by the
and sucrose () in germinating soybean seeds. MichaelisMenten plot for NPGal hydrolysis by the
668 S. de Fatima Viana et al. / Food Chemistry 93 (2005) 665670

Table 1
Summary of the steps of a-galactosidase purication from germinating soybean seeds
Purication step Total protein (mg) Total activity (U) Specic activity (U/mg) Purication (fold) Recovery (%)
Crude extract 1388 103.3 0.07 1 100
Upper layer of ATPS 147 35.2 0.23 3.28 34.0
Dialyzed sample 108 34.2 0.31 4.42 33.1
CM-sepharose 29.6 26.4 0.89 12.7 25.6

120 120
35 C
40 C
100 100 45 C

Residual activity (%)


50 C
Relative activity (%)

80 80

60 60

40 40

20 20

0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
pH Incubation time (min)

120 Fig. 3. Temperature inuences on the stability of a-galactosidase from


germinating soybean seeds. Enzyme preparation was pre-incubated at
35 C (d), 40 C (s), 45 C (.), and 50 C (,) for up to 3 h and the
100
assays run at 37 C.
Relative activity (%)

80

et al., 2001) and from a-galactosidase from Penicillium


60
sp. 23 (Varbanets, Malanchuk, Buglova, & Kuhlmann,
2001). It is, however, much lower than those reported
40
for ranose hydrolysis by enzymes from Torulaspora
delbrueckii IFO 1255 (Oda & Tonomura, 1996) and
20
Aspergillus fumigatus (De Rezende & Felix, 1999).
The partially puried a-galactosidase was slightly
0
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 thermostable. No detectable activity was lost after incu-
Temperature (C) bation for 3 h at 3540 C. The enzyme retained about
40% of its original activity after incubation for 3 h at
Fig. 2. Inuence of pH and temperature on the activity of a-
45 C, but 78% of the activity was lost following 30
galactosidase from germinating soybean seeds.
min of incubation at 50 C (Fig. 3).
The activity of the a-galactosidase preparation
enzyme preparation were 0.33 mM and 2.91 against several substrates is shown in Table 2. Under
lmol min 1 ml 1, respectively. For the hydrolysis of the experimental conditions used, the enzyme was more
melibiose, these values were 0.42 mM and 0.17 eective to hydrolyze qNPGal, followed by ranose,
lmol min 1 ml 1, respectively. They are comparable to stachyose, and melibiose. Synthetic substrates contain-
the values determined for qNPGal hydrolysis by a crude ing b-linkages or containing xylose qNP-X, arabinose
(Cruz & Silva, 1986) and puried (Guimaraes et al., qNP-A, and mannose qNP-M were not hydrolyzed by
2001) a-galactosidase from germinating soybean seeds the enzyme preparation (Table 2).
and for melibiose hydrolysis by a-galactosidase II from The a-galactosidase preparation showed distinct sen-
Aspergillus niger (Ademark, Larsso, Tjerneld, & Stal- sitivities to simple sugars and mono and divalent ions
brand, 2001). The KM app and Vmax values for ranose (Fig. 4). The enzyme presented very low or no inhibition
hydrolysis were 6.01 mM and 3.32 lmol min 1 ml 1, by sodium, b-mercaptoethanol, sucrose, potassium,
respectively. The KM app value is close to the one deter- magnesium, iodacetamide, glucose, and EDTA, but
mined for a-galactosidase puried from dry (Porter was highly inhibited by SDS, copper and galactose.
et al., 1990) and germinating soybean seeds (Guimaraes The enzyme was only partially inhibited by calcium,
S. de Fatima Viana et al. / Food Chemistry 93 (2005) 665670 669

Table 2 Table 3
Hydrolysis of several substrates with a-galactosidase from germinating Hydrolysis of oligosaccharides present in soybean our by a-galacto-
soybean seeds sidase from germinating soybean seeds
Substrate Concentration (mM) Relative activitya (%) SD Hydrolysis Ranose content Stachyose content
time (h) (%) SD (%) SD
qNP-a-Galb 0.5 100 6.5
qNP-b-Galb 0.5 0 0 1.29 0.09 5.0 0.30
oNP-b-Galb 0.5 0 2 0.22 0.01 2.2 0.11
qNP-a-Glcb 0.5 0 4 0.21 0.01 1.72 0.09
qNP-a-Xylb 0.5 0 6 0.13 0.01 1.38 0.08
qNP-a-Arab 0.5 0
qNP-a-Manb 0.5 0
Ranose 40 113.0 4.4 our was tested. The soybean our contained 32.3%
Stachyose 40 50.78 3.0
Melibiose 40 7.9 0.81
sugar, 59.5% protein, 0.04% oil, and 8.2% ash. The par-
Sucrose 40 7.78 0.19 tially puried a-galactosidase from germinating soybean
Maltose 40 5.53 4.00 seeds reduced the stachyose and ranose content in soy-
Lactose 40 4.63 0.72 bean our by 72.3% and 89.2%, respectively, after incu-
a
Relative activities were calculated in relation to qNP-a-Gal bation for 6 h at 40 C (Table 3). No oligosaccharide
activity , that was considered as 100%. hydrolysis was detected in control tubes where the en-
b
qNP-a-Gal, para-nitrophenyl-b-D -galactopyranoside; qNP-b- zyme extract had been replaced by water. As the extract
Gal, para-nitrophenyl-b-D -galactopyranoside; oNP-b-Gal, ortho-
nitrophenyl-b-D -galactopyranoside; qNP-a-Glc, para-nitrophenyl-a-D -
showed no invertase activity, these results indicate that
glicopyranoside; qNP-a-Xyl, para-nitrophenyl-a-D -xylopyranoside; soybean a-galactosidase acts on the oligosaccharides
qNP-a-Ara, para-nitrophenyl-a-D -arabinopyranoside; qNP-a-Man, present in the soybean our extract. Several food scien-
para-nitrophenyl-a-D -mannopyranoside. tists have suggested the possibility to improve the nutri-
tional value of soybean our and soymilk by reducing
the ROs content. Microbial a-galactosidases were used
120
to degrade ROs in soymilk by Thananunkul, Tananka,
Chichester, and Lee (1976), Cruz, Batistela, and
100
Wosiacki (1981), Cruz and Park (1982), Mulimani and
Relative activity (%)

Ramalingam (1995), Kotwal, Gote, Sainkar, Khan,


80
and Khire (1998), Scalabrini et al. (1998) and Thippesw-
amy and Mulimani (2002). Mulimani, Thippeswamy,
60
and Ramalingam (1997) obtained promising results at
removing ROs from soybean our by crude a-galactosi-
40
dase from guar seed. Guimaraes et al. (2001) reported
that the soybean seed a-galactosidase or the correspond-
20
ing genes can be used to establish a process to hydrolyze
ROs and improve the nutritional value of soymilk. Nev-
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
ertheless, there is no biotechnological process available
Effector for the enzymatic treatment of soymilk or soybean our
with native or recombinant soybean enzymes. Since the
Fig. 4. Eect of NaCl (2); b-mercaptoethanol (3); sucrose (4); KCl (5);
MgCl2 (6); Iodacetamide (7); D -Glucose (8); EDTA (9); CaCl2 (10);
enzymes used for this purpose are generally of microbial
melibiose (11); ranose (12); SDS (13); CuSO4 (14); and D -galactose origin, they present the disadvantage of not having the
(15) on a-galactosidase from germinating soybean seeds, and (1) GRAS (generally regarded as safe) status.
without eector. The nal concentration of SDS was 1 mM. Final
concentrations of all the other eectors were 2 mM.
4. Conclusions

melibiose, and ranose. It has been suggested that a- In the present work, we evaluated the germination ef-
galactosidase is not a metalloenzyme and the sulfhydryl fect on the ROs content reduction in soybean seed and
groups do not take part in catalysis (lack of the inhibitor tested the use of a-galactosidase from germinating soy-
eects under treatment of enzyme by EDTA and iodac- bean seeds for the hydrolysis of oligosaccharides found
etamide, respectively). This is in agreement with the re- in soybean our. The two treatments were ecient to re-
sults reported for the a-galactosidase isolated from the move the ROs content. The study of the enzyme proper-
culture liquid of Penicillium sp. 23 (Varbanets et al., ties showed that a-galactosidase from soybean seed is of
2001). potential interest to convert ROs in soybean our to
The potential of soybean a-galactosidase to hydro- digestible sugars. The enzyme may be a better choice
lyze the oligosaccharides present in fat-free soybean than a-galactosidase of microbial origin because, unlike
670 S. de Fatima Viana et al. / Food Chemistry 93 (2005) 665670

the homologous enzyme from microbial sources, soy- Humicola sp. in solid-state fermentation and its application in
bean a-galactosidase is uniquely suited for the high pro- soymilk hydrolysis. Process Biochemistry, 33, 337343.
Machaiah, J. P., & Pednekar, M. D. (2002). Carbohydrate composi-
tein and strongly buered environment of soybean our. tion of low dose radiation-processed legumes and reduction in
Data from our studies indicate that this soybean enzyme atulence factors. Food Chemistry, 79, 293301.
will have practical applications to reduce atulence Mansour, E. H., & Khalil, A. H. (1998). Reduction of ranose
caused by soybean our consumption. oligosaccharides in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) our by crude
extracellular fungal a-galactosidase. Journal of the Science of Food
and Agriculture, 78, 175181.
Miller, G. L. (1956). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determi-
References nation of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31, 426428.
Modi, A. T., McDonald, M. B., & Streeter, J. G. (2000). Soluble
Ademark, P., Larsso, M., Tjerneld, F., & Stalbrand, H. (2001). carbohydrates in soybean seeds during development and imbibi-
Multiple a-galactosidases from Aspergillus niger: purication, tion. Seed Science and Technology, 28(1), 115127.
characterization and substrate specicities. Enzyme and Microbial Mulimani, V. H., & Ramalingam (1995). Enzymic hydrolysis of
Technology, 29, 441448. ranose and stachyose in soymilk by a-galactosidase from
Association of Ocial Analytical Chemists AOAC. (1975). Ocial Gibberella fujikuroi. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Interna-
methods of analysis of the Association of Ocial Analytical tional, 36, 897905.
Chemists (p. 1094), Washington. Mulimani, V. H., & Devendra, S. (1998). Eect of soaking, cooking
Bau, H. M., Villaume, C. H., & Mejean, L. (2000). Eects of soybean and crude a-galactosidase treatment on the oligosaccharide content
(Glycine max) germination on biologically active components, of red gram our. Food Chemistry, 61, 475479.
nutritional values of seeds, and biological characteristics in rats. Mulimani, V. H., Thippeswamy, S., & Ramalingam (1997). Enzymatic
Nahrung, 44, 26. degradation of oligosaccharides in soybean ours. Food Chemistry,
Bergmeyer, H. U., & Bernt, E. (1974). Determination of glucose with 59, 279282.
oxidase and peroxidase. In H. U. Bergmeyer (Ed.), Methods of Naczk, M., Amarowicz, R., & Shahidi, F. (1997). a-Galactosidase of
enzymatic analysis (pp. 12051215). Weinheim: Verlag Chemie. sucrose in foods: composition, atulence-causing eects, and
Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensivite method for the removal. In F. Shahidi (Ed.), Antinutrients and Phytochemicals in
quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the Food (pp. 127151). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
principle of protein-dye binding. Analitical Biochemistry, 72, Oda, Y., & Tonomura, K. (1996). a-Galactosidase from the yeast
248254. Torulaspora delbrueckii IFO 1255. Journal of Applied Bacteriology,
Cruz, R., & Silva, A. I. (1986). Soybean (Glycine max), endogenous a- 80, 203208.
galactosidase and invertase during the germinative process. Arqui- Porter, J. E., Herrmann, K. M., & Ladish, M. R. (1990). Integral
vos Biologia Tecnologia, 29, 435443. kinetics of a-galactosidase puried from Glycine max for simulta-
Cruz, R., Batistela, J. C., & Wosiacki, G. (1981). Microbial a- neous hydrolysis of stachyose and ranose. Biotechnology Bioen-
galactosidase for soymilk processing. Journal of Food Science, 46, gineering, 35, 1522.
11961200. Sanni, A. I., Onilude, A. A., & Ogundoye, O. R. (1997). Eect of
Cruz, R., & Park, Y. K. (1982). Production of fungal a-galactosidase bacterial galactosidase treatment on the nutritional status of
and its application to the hydrolysis of galactooligosaccharides in soybean seeds and its milk derivate. Nahrung, 41, 1821.
soybean milk. Journal of Food Science, 47, 19731975. Saravitz, D. M., Pharr, D. M., & Carter, T. E. (1987). Galactinol
De Lumen, O. B. (1992). Molecular strategies to improve protein synthase activity and soluble sugars in developing seeds of four
quality and reduced atulence in legumes: a review. Food Structure, soybean genotypes. Plant Physiology, 83, 185189.
11, 3346. Scalabrini, P., Rossi, M., Spettoli, P., & Matteuzzi, D. (1998).
De Rezende, S. T., & Felix, C. R. (1999). Production and character- Characterization of Bidobacterium strains for use in soymilk
ization of ranose-hydrolyzing and invertase activities of Asper- fermentation. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 39,
gillus fumigatus. Folia Microbiologica, 44, 191195. 213219.
De, S. S. (1971). Technology of production of edible ours and protein Shivanna, B. D., Ramakrishna, M., & Ramadoss, C. S. (1989).
products from soybean. Agricultural Services Bulletim, 11, 1158. Enzymic hydrolysis of ranose and stachyose in soymilk by a-
Dey, P. M., & Pridham, J. B. (1972). Biochemistry of a-galactosidases. galactosidase from germinating guar (Cyamopsis tetragonolobus).
Advanced Enzymology, 36, 91130. Process Biochemistry, 24, 197201.
Guimaraes, V. M., De Rezende, S. T., Moreira, M. A., Barros, E. G., Steggerda, F. R. (1968). Gastrointestinal gas following food consump-
& Felix, C. R. (2001). Characterization of a-galactosidases from tion. Annual N.Y. Academic Science, 50, 5766.
germinating soybean seed and their use for hydrolysis of oligosac- Thananunkul, D., Tananka, M., Chichester, C. O., & Lee, T. C.
charides. Phytochemistry, 58, 6773. (1976). Degradation of ranose and stachyose in soybean milk by
Herman, E. M., & Shannon, L. M. (1985). Accumulation and a-galactosidase within polyacrylamide gel. Journal Food Science,
subcellular localization of a-galactosidase hemagglutinin in devel- 41, 173175.
oping soybean cotyledons. Plant Physiology, 77, 886890. Thippeswamy, S., & Mulimani, V. H. (2002). Enzymic degradation of
Hustedt, H., Kroner, K. K., & Kula, M. R. (1985). Applications of ranose family oligosaccharides in soymilk by immobilized a-
phase partitioning in biotechnology. In H. Walter, D. E. Brooks, & galactosidase from Gibberella fujokuroi. Process Biochemistry,
D. Fisher (Eds.), Partitioning in aqueous two-phase systems. 38(5), 635664.
Orlando: Academic Press. Varbanets, L. D., Malanchuk, V. M., Buglova, T. T., & Kuhlmann, R.
Kotwal, S. M., Gote, M. M., Sainkar, S. R., Khan, M. I., & Khire, J. A. (2001). Penicillium sp. 23 a-galactosidase: purication and
M. (1998). Production of a-galactosidase by thermophilic fungus substrate specicity. Carbohydrate Polymers, 44, 357363.

Você também pode gostar