Você está na página 1de 13

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee : CATHERINE ANNE S. GAYETA Name of Rater : MARICEL R. CHAN


Position : TEACHER I Position : MASTER TEACHER I
Review Period : JUNE2016 -MARCH 2017 Date of Review : 10-Apr-17
Bureau/Center/ Service/Division: LAG U NA

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO


Weight AC
MFO's KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Performance Indicators
Per KRA Q
Basic A. Teaching- 1. Facilitates learning in the elementary June 2016 QUALITY and TIMELINESS
Education Learning /secondary through functional daily to 5- Delivered accurate and updated content knowledge
Services Process lesson plans, logs and use of March 2017 15% using innovative teaching strategies is highly evident.
30% innovative teaching strategies. 4- Delivered updated content knowledge using innovative
teaching strategies is very satisfactorily evident.
3- Delivered updated content knowledge using innovative
teaching strategies is satisfactorily evident.
2- Delivered updated content knowledge using innovative
teaching strategies is fairly evident.
1- Delivered updated content knowledge using innovative
teaching strategies is not evident.
EFFICIENCY
5- 96-100% individual and group activities were provided
that are alligned with the competencies.
4- 86-95% individual and group activities were provided
that are alligned with the competencies.
3- 76-85% individual and group activities were provided
that are alligned with the competencies.
2- 66-75% individual and group activities were provided
that are alligned with the competencies.
1- below-65% individual and group activities were provided
that are alligned with the competencies
4
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO
Weight AC
MFO's KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Performance Indicators
Per KRA Q
2. Demonstrates value for learning June 2016 QUALITY
through being careful about the to 15% 5- discipline in the classroom was highly evident
effect of ones' behavior on March 2017 4- discipline in the classroom was satisfactorily evident
learners. 3- discipline in the classroom was fairly evident
2 - discipline in the classroom was less evident
1- discipline in the classroom was not evident
EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS
5- 100% of the learners maintained discipline guided by
by the classrooms rules, regulations and guidelines
4- 76-99% of the learners maintained discipline guided by
the classrooms rules, regulations and guidelines.
3- 51-75% of the learners maintained discipline guided by
the classrooms rules , regulations and guidelines.
2- 26-50 % of the learners maintained discipline guided by
the classrooms rules, regulations and guidelines
1- 25% and below of the learners maintained discipline
guided by the classrooms rules ,regulations and
guidelines.
4

Basic B. Student's 1. Develops and uses a variety of QUALITY , EFFICIENCY and TIMELINESS
Education Outcomes appropriate assessment strategies June 2016 15% 5- All outputs in assessment were monitored, evaluated
Services to monitor and evaluate learning. to and maintained
March 2017 4- Only 4 of the outputs were monitored, evaluated and
maintained
3- Only 3 of the outputs indicated were monitored,
evaluated and maintained
2- Only 2 of the outputs indicated were monitored
evaluated and maintained
1- Only 1 of the outputs indicated was monitored,
evaluated and maintained

4
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO
Weight AC
MFO's KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Performance Indicators
Per KRA Q
QUALITY , EFFICIENCY and TIMELINESS
2. Accounts learning outcomes vis--vis June 2016 5- 75% to 100% met all the targets.
goals and targets. to 15% 4- 65% to 74% met all the targets.
March 2017 3- 55% to 64% met all the targets.
Targets: 2- 45% to 54% met all the targets
MPS in Quarterly Assessment- 75% 1- 44% and below met all the targets.
Participation Rate - 95%
Completion Rate - 85%
4

QUALITY
Basic C. Community 1. Establish learning environment that June 2016 5- 100% accomplishment with set agreements met
Education Involvement responds to the aspiration of the to 10% 4- 85% of planned meetings conducted producing only
Services community. March 2017 set agreements and partial accomplishment of these.
15% 3- 75% of planned meetings conducted producing only set
agreements
2- 50% of planned meetings conducted with minimal results
1- 25% and below of planned meetings conducred with
no results.
EFFICIENCY
5- 5 or more PTA meetings/conferences were conducted
4- 4 PTA meetings/conferences were conducted
3- 3 PTA meetings/conferences were conducted
2- 2 PTA meetings/conferences were conducted
1- 1 PTA meeting/conferences were conducted
TIMELINESS
5- Conducted meetings/conferences on time
4- Conducted meetings/conferences 15 minutes late
3- Conducted meetings/conferences 30 minutes late
2- Conducted meetings/conferences 1 hour late
1- Never conducted meetings /conferences

4
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO
Weight AC
MFO's KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Performance Indicators
Per KRA Q
2. Undertake/initiate at least four (4) QUALITY
projects/ events/activities such as June 2016 10% 5- Actively undertaken and initiated projects,events and
- feeding program to activities as chairman with documentation
- clean-up drive March 2017 4- Actively undertaken and initiated projects,events and
- tree planting activities as co-chairman with documentation
- sports and festival 3- Actively undertaken and initiated projects,events and
within the rating period. activities as member with documentation
2- Just attended the activity with documentation
1- Just attended the activity without any documentation
EFFICIENCY
5- 4 activities were undertaken and initiated
4- 3 activities were undertaken and initiated
3- 2 activities were undertaken and initiated
2- 1 activity was undertaken and initiated
1 - None
TIMELINESS
5- Accomplishment reports submitted before due date
4- Accomplishment reports submitted on due date
3- Accomplishment reports submitted after due date
2- Accomplishment reports submitted a week after due date
1 - Never submitted accomplishment reports 4
Basic Professional 1. Allocates time for personal growth QUALITY
Education Growth and and professional development through June 2016 5- 100% accomplishment with complete documentation
Services Development participation in educational seminars to 10% 4- 100% accomplishment with incomplete documentation
and workshops, reading educational March 2017 3- 75% accomplishment with complete documentation
10% materials regularly and conduct at 2- 50% accomplishment with complete documentation
least one classroom based Action 1- 25% accomplishment with complete documentation
Research. EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS
5- Accomplishment reports submitted before due date
4- Accomplishment reports submitted on due date
3- Accomplishment reports submitted after due date
2- Accomplishment reports submitted a week after due date
1 - Never submitted accomplishment reports 4
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING
Weight AC
MFO's KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Performance Indicators
Per KRA Q
1. Received special awards/citation/ QUALITY
Plus Factor recognition for exemplary performance June 2016 5% 5- Received special awards in National Level
as coach/trainer, resource speaker, to 4- Received special awards in Regional Level
facilitator and others. March 2017 3- Received special awards in Division Level
2- Received special awards in District Level
1- Received special awards in School Level
EFFICIENCY
5- 4 or more awards received
4- 3 awards received
3- 2 awards received
2- 1 awards received
1 - None
TIMELINESS
5- Accomplishment reports submitted before due date
4- Accomplishment reports submitted on due date
3- Accomplishment reports submitted after due date
2- Accomplishment reports submitted a week after due date
1 - Never submitted accomplishment reports 1
2. Conducted remediation program to QUALITY , EFFICIENCY and TIMELINESS
Plus Factor ___ slow learners and enrichment June 2016 5% 5- 100% of the target performance indicators were met
programs to ____ average and talented to 4- 75% of the target performance indicators were met
learners to improve performance March 2017 3- 50% of the target performance indicators were met
indicators before end of the school year. 2- 25% of the target performance indicators were met
1- 0 % of the target performance indicators were met 4

100%

MARICEL R. CHAN CATHERINE ANNE S. GAYETA


Rater Ratee
APPROVED:

REMEDIOS C. SAN PEDRO


Principal I
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULT
Rating Score
E T AVE.

4 4 4.000 0.600 1.200


TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULT
Rating Score
E T AVE.

4 4 4.000 0.600

4 4 4.000 0.600 1.200


TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULT
Rating Score
E T AVE.

4 4 4.000 0.600

3 3 3.333 0.333 0.667


TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULT
Rating Score
E T AVE.

3 3 3.333 0.333

4 4 4.000 0.400 0.400


ACTUAL RESULT
Rating Score
E T AVE.

3 3 2.333 0.117 0.317

4 4 4.000 0.200
OVERALL 3.783333
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Name of Employee: CATHERINE ANNE S. GAYETA
Position: TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: LAGUNA
Rating Period: JUNE2016 -MARCH 2017

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

KRA Weight per KRA Objectives

KRA1
Teaching Learning Process 10% Objective 1
10% Objective 2

KRA2
Student's Outcome 10% Objective 1
10% Objective 2

KRA3
Community Involvement 3% Objective 1
3% Objective 2

KRA4
Professional Growth and 4% Objective 1
Development

Plus Factor
5% Objective 1
5% Objective 2

Final Rating

MARICEL R. CHAN CATHERINE ANNE S. GA


Rater

APPROVED:

REMEDIOS C. SAN PED


Principal I
District:

D REVIEW FORM

Rating Score

0.600
0.600 1.200

0.600
0.600 1.200

0.333
0.333 0.667

0.400 0.400

0.117
0.200 0.317

Final Rating 3.783

CATHERINE ANNE S. GAYETA


Ratee

REMEDIOS C. SAN PEDRO


Principal I

Você também pode gostar