Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
"Yes, indeed; and so do the trees over there. Logic won't do for them."
"Metaphor."
"Metaphor?"
William H. Calvin, The Cerebral Code (1996) MIT Press [pages 159-
160]:
[JL - This quote may be about sub-atomic physics but could equally
apply to Metaphoric Landscapes]
Guy Claxton, Hare Brain Tortoise Mind (1997) Fourth Estate, London
[page 46]:
"I wonder whether the ability to see analogies, the ability to express
meanings in terms of symbolic resemblances to other things, may have
been the crucial software advance that propelled human brain
evolution over the threshold into a co-evolutionary spiral.
[JL - my embolden]
Robert Dilts, John Grinder, Richard Bandler, Leslie C. Bandler,
Judith DeLozier, Neuro-Linguistic Programming: Volume 1, The Study
of the Structure of Subjective Experience (1980) Meta Publications,
Cupertino, DA [pp 11-13]:
Brian Goodwin, How the Leopard Changed its Spots: The Evolution of
Complexity (1994) Phoenix, London [page 32]:
"The point ... is not to conclude that there is something wrong with
Darwin's theory because it is clearly linked to some very powerful
cultural myths and metaphors. All theories have metaphorical
dimensions which I regard as not only inevitable but also extremely
important. For it is these dimensions that give depth and meaning to
scientific ideas, that add to their persuasiveness, and colour the way
we see reality."
"That dreams use metaphor has been noted by many theorists but that
all dreams use metaphor is a new finding. My research indicates that,
not only do all dreams use metaphor, but that the entire dream
sequence is a metaphorical expression of a waking concern. This
means that everybody and everything in the dream sequence is an
analogous substitute for some person, thing or event in waking life. ...
We are not seeing metaphor used as a dramatic device to highlight
certain principles or concepts as might be used in the creation of a
work of art, but rather the translation of a waking concern into an
analogous sensory scenario."
John Grinder 'An Interview with John Grinder' in NLP World, Vol 4, No
1, March 1997 [page 46]:
"All which is not concrete is metaphoric -- clearly, this involves the vast
majority of our everyday experiences. The structure of the unconscious
- easily the most influential factor in our success in life - or more
correctly said, the relationship which we have with our unconscious is
easily the most important factor in our success in life - is that of
metaphor.
"The first objective is for the therapist to keep the language clean and
allow the client's language to manifest itself. The second objective is
that the clean language used by the therapist be a facilitatory
language; in the sense that it will ease entry into the matrix of
experience, and into an altered state that may be helpful for the client
to internally access his experience.
Our questions will have given a form, made manifest some particular
aspect of the client's internal experience in a way that he has not
experienced before."
James Hillman, The Soul's Code (1996) Random House [pages 39-40]:
"Each life is formed by its unique image, an image that is the essence
of that life and calls it to a destiny. As the force of fate, this image acts
as a personal daimon, an accompanying guide who remembers your
calling.
[JL - my embolden]
"We invent mind-space inside our own heads as well as the heads of
others ... we assume these 'spaces' without question. They are a part
of what it is to be conscious. Moreover, things that in the physical-
behavioural world that do not have a spatial quality are made to have
such in consciousness. Otherwise we cannot be conscious of them.
"We have discovered, over the past decade and a half, that a
conceptual system contains an enormous subsystem of thousands of
conceptual metaphors -- mappings that allow us to understand the
abstract in terms of the concrete. Without this system, we could not
engage in abstract thought at all -- in thought about causation,
purpose, love, morality, or thought itself. Without the metaphor
system, there could be no philosophizing, no theorizing, and little
general understanding our everyday personal and social lives. But the
operation of this vast system of conceptual metaphor is largely
unconscious. We reason metaphorically throughout most of our
waking, and even our dreaming lives, but for the most part are
unaware of it. At present, the metaphor system of English has barely
begun to be worked out in full detail, and the metaphor systems of
other languages have been studied only cursorily. Working out the
details would be a huge job -- not as big as the human genome project,
but most likely more beneficial. For what is at stake is our
understanding of ourselves and our daily lives, and the possibilities for
improvement through that understanding."
"I have found it useful to imagine the Earth as like an animal. It has
never been more than a metaphor and an aide pensee. Recently, on
becoming aware of global heating, I have thought of the Earth as a
camel. Camels, unlike most animals, regulate their body temperatures
at two different but stable states. ... Metaphor is important because to
deal with, understand, and even ameliorate the fix we are now in over
global change requires us to know the true nature of the Earth and
imagine it as the largest living thing in the solar system, not something
inanimate like that disreputable contraption 'spaceship Earth'."
We still do not know where the urge for truth comes from; for as yet we
have heard only of the obligation imposed by society that it should
exist: to be truthful means using the customary metaphors -- in moral
terms, the obligation to lie according to fixed convention, to lie herd-
like in a style obligatory for all ... "
"... the very possibility of learning something radically new can only be
understood by presupposing the operation of something very much like
metaphor. This is not just the heuristic claim that metaphors are often
useful in learning, but the epistemic claim that metaphor, or something
very much like it, is what renders possible and intelligible the
acquisition of new knowledge.
[JL- my embolden]
Stephen Pinker, How The Mind Works (1997) The Softback Preview,
London [page 355]:
Space and force pervade language. Many cognitive scientists
(including me) have concluded from their research on language that a
handful of concepts about places, paths, motions, agency, and
causation underlie the literal or figurative meanings of tens of
thousands of words and constructions, not only in English but in every
other language that has been studied. ... These concepts and relations
appear to be the vocabulary and syntax of mentalese, the language of
thought. ... And the discovery that the elements of mentalese are
based on places and projectiles has implications for both where the
language of thought came from and how we put it to use in modern
times.
"'You don't see something until you have the right metaphor to let you
perceive it' [Robert Stetson] Shaw said, echoing Thomas S Kuhn."