Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Please cite this article in press as Dhananjay M. patil et al, Formulation Development and Evaluation of
Orodispersible Tablet of Cinnarizine Solid Dispersion, Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2017; 4(04).
drying. The dried mass was sieved through 40 Formulation of tablets using Solid dispersion of
mesh screen. The solid dispersion was stored in a Cinnarizine
dessicator until further evaluation. Tablets containing equivalent to 25 mg of
Cinnarizine solid dispersion were prepared by
Characterization of solid dispersion direct compression. The blend was compressed on
Saturation solubility studies[15]: a 10 station rotary machine using round shaped,
Excess quantity of pure Cinnarizine and its all concave punches. The composition of tablet is
prepared physical mixtures and solid dispersions given in following table.
with Soluplus were added in a 50 ml of glass Table 1: Composition of tablet
stoppered volumetric flasks containing 25 ml of Ingredients F1 F2 F3 F4
solvent (pH 1.2 buffer solution and phosphate
(mg) (mg) (mg) (mg)
buffer pH 6.8 separately). The flasks were sealed,
placed on mechanical shaker and agitated for 24 Solid Dispersion 100 100 100 100
hrs at 280C 0.20C. After 24 hrs, the samples were Kyron T 314 2 4 6 8
then filtered through Whatman filter paper, diluted Aspartame 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
suitably and absorbance was measured at 254 nm. Magnesium 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
stearate
Drug content [15]: Talc 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
The content of Cinnarizine in each physical
Microcrystalline 95.6 93.6 91.6 89.6
mixture and solid dispersions was determined using
cellulose pH 102
by UV spectroscopy. Accurately weighed physical
mixture or solid dispersion equivalent to 25 mg of Total 200 200 200 200
Cinnarizine was transferred to 100 ml volumetric
flask containing 10 ml of methanol and dissolved. Evaluation
The volume was made up to 100 ml with methanol. Physical evaluation of tablet blend
The solution was filter through Whatman filter Angle of repose[19]:
paper. 1 ml of this solution was diluted 10 times The angle of repose of each powder blend was
with methanol to achieve 25 g/ml and the determined by glass funnel method by using the
absorbance was measured at 254 nm. following equation
tan = h/r
Infrared spectroscopy[16,17]: Where,
IR spectra were obtained by KBr disk method h = height of cone
using Fourier- transform infrared (FTIR) r = radius of powder cone
spectrometer (8400 S Shimadzu). KBr disks
prepared using hydrostatic press a thrust of 5 Bulk density[19]:
tons/cm2 for 5 min. The scanning range was 400 to Bulk density of solid dispersion granules were
4000 cm-1. determined by pouring gently 25 gm of sample
through a glass funnel into a 100 ml graduated
Differential scanning calorimetry[16,17]: cylinder. The powder was carefully leveled without
The DSC measurements were performed on a compacting it and the apparent volume was
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (Shimadzu-DSC measured (Vo). Bulk density was calculated as
60) with a thermal analyzer. All accurately below-
weighed samples (5 mg) were placed in sealed Bulk density = M/Vo
aluminum pans, before heating under nitrogen flow Where,
(10 ml/min) at a scanning rate of 10C/min. from M = mass of powder
35C- 300C. An empty aluminum pan was used as Vo = apparent unstirred volume
reference.
density and tapped density. Carrs index is also In-vitro disintegration study[18,20]:
known compressibility index and which was The process of breakdown of a tablet into smaller
calculated. particles is called as disintegration.
The in-vitro disintegration time of a tablet was
determined using disintegration test apparatus. The
disintegration test was carried out using USP
disintegration test apparatus-II. Tablets were placed
Hausners ratio[19]: individually in each tube of disintegration test
It provides an indication of the degree of apparatus and discs were placed over each tablet.
densification that could result from vibration of Distilled water (900 ml) was used as the medium
feed hopper. Lower the hausner ratio better is the which is maintained at 37 2C and the time taken
flowability. for each tablet to disintegrate completely was
Tapped density recorded.
Hausner ratio
Bulk density Hardness[20]:
Evaluation of tablets Tablet hardness and resistance to powder and
The tablets were evaluated for the following test friability are necessary requisites for acceptance.
parameters, The Pfizer hardness tester was used for hardness
testing. Generally 4 kg/cm2 hardness is considered
Weight variation test[18]: as acceptable for uncoated tablets.
Twenty tablets of each formulation were weighed
individually using an electronic balance. The Wetting time[21,22]:
average weight was calculated and individual tablet A piece of tissue paper folded twice was kept in
was compared with the average value and the petri dish (internal diameter 5.5 cm) containing 10
deviation was recovered. ml of distilled water. A tablet having a small
amount of amaranth powder on the upper surface
Content uniformity of tablets[15]: was placed on the tissue paper. The time required
Ten tablets were weighed and crushed in a small to develop a red color on the upper surface of the
mortar. The fine powder equivalent to 25 mg of tablet was recorded as wetting time.
Cinnarizine was transferred to 100 ml volumetric
flask containing 10 ml of methanol and dissolved. Water absorption ratio[21,22]:
The volume was made up to 100 ml with methanol. A piece of tissue paper folded twice was placed in
The solution was filter through Whatman filter a small Petri dish (5 cm diameter) containing 6 ml
paper. 1 ml of this solution was diluted 10 times of water. A tablet was put on the tissue paper and
with methanol to achieve 25 g/ml and the allowed to wet completely. The wetted tablet was
absorbance was measured at 254 nm. then weighed and the water absorption ratio R
was determined by using following equation.
Thickness:
Twenty tablets were randomly selected from R = Wb - Wa x 100
formulations and thickness was measured Wa
individually. It was expressed in millimeter and Where,
average was calculated. Wa= weight of tablet before water absorption
Wb = weight of tablet after water absorption.
Friability test[18]:
Friability test is performed to assess the effect of In-vitro dispersion time[23]:
friction and shocks, which may often cause tablet to In-vitro dispersion time of prepared tablet was done
chip, cap or break. Roche friabilator was used for the by dropping the tablet in 10 ml measuring cylinder
purpose. (according to USP monograph 1216 - containing 6 ml of simulated salivary fluid (pH
tablets with a unit weight equal to or less than 650 6.8). Time required for complete dispersion of
mg, take a sample of whole tablets corresponding as tablet was measured.
near as possible to 6.5 gm.) Pre weighed sample of
tablets was placed in the friabilator, which was then
operated for 100 revolutions/min. Tablets were Dissolution study[18]:
dusted and reweighed. The percentage friability was In order to study prepared tablet subjected to the
calculated by, dissolution study using USP dissolution apparatus
type II (Paddle) maintained at 37 0.5oC and 50
W initial W final rpm. Dissolution medium used is pH 1.2 buffer
F= ------------------- 100 900ml. Samples of 5 ml were withdrawn at regular
W final interval of 3 min. The volume withdrawn was
Percentage weight loss was calculated. A loss of replaced by fresh volume of dissolution medium to
less than 0.5 to 1 % in weight was generally maintain constant volume of medium. The filtered
acceptable.
samples were analyzed spectrophotometrically at drug content, and in-vitro dissolution were
254 nm. evaluated according to the procedure described as
above.
Stability studies[24]: RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:
In the present study, the stability studies were Characterization of solid dispersion system
carried out as per ICH guidelines at 40C 2C/75 Saturation solubility studies:
% 5% RH for the selected formulation (F4) for 3
month. After specified time intervals, parameters
like hardness, dispersion time, disintegration time,
Mean, SD, n= 3
Table 3: Saturation solubility of PD, PMs and SDs in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer
Mean, SD, n= 3
Fig 2: Saturation solubility of PD, PMs and SDs in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer
The saturation solubility profile for the pure Table 4: Results of drug content with Soluplus.
Cinnarizine and its all prepared physical mixture
and solid dispersion is shown in figure no.6.5 and Methods Drug Content Ratio
6.6. These figures indicate that Cinnarizine is (%)
having very low solubility i.e. 0.6326 mg/ml and Physical Method 1:1 98.78.8050
0.0039 mg/ml in pH 1.2 buffer solution and pH 6.8 (PMs) 1:2 99.19.8798
phosphate buffer respectively. Physical mixture 1:3 99.20.9814
and solid dispersion with Soluplus shows increase Solvent 1:1 99.23.3098
in solubility respectively as concentration of Evaporation 1:2 99.13.9226
polymer is increases. Method (SDs) 1:3 100.04.4000
The ratio 1:3 of solid dispersion gives the Mean, SD, n= 3
maximum saturation solubility among all the The drug content of Cinnarizine physical mixtures
physical mixture and solid dispersions i.e. 4.8460 and solid dispersions was found to be in range
mg/ml and 0.030684 mg/ml in pH 1.2 buffer 98.78 % to 100.04 % and these values are within
solutions and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer respectively. the acceptable range. Low values of standard
Analysis of drug content deviation with respect to drug content indicate
The percentage drug content of PMs and SDs are uniformity of drug distribution in all the physical
shown in table no 4. mixtures and solid dispersions of Cinnarizine.
30
%T
25
20
1029.92
15
1384.79
1596.95
1184.21
923.84
1371.29
10
1357.79
864.05
1076.21
2690.51
1305.72
2864.09
1278.72
1004.84
5
3022.25
2956.67
1490.87
964.34
1141.78
1448.44
2767.66
2810.09
4000 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600
sample 1 1/cm
14
%T
12
10
2156.27
8
2474.50
717.47
6
840.91
946.98
4
973.99
1024.13
1112.85
1197.71
2
1375.15
1481.23
1438.80
1242.07
1627.81
1739.67
2858.31
3537.20
2929.67
3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800
sample 2 1/cm
45
%T
37.5
642.25
1868.89
1959.54
30
794.62
837.05
923.84
864.05
2362.64
1029.92
22.5
1336.58
1197.71
1076.21
3056.96
999.06
1371.29
3022.25
740.61
15
2864.09
1265.22
1490.87
964.34
1733.89
2958.60
1141.78
1635.52
2767.66
1448.44
7.5
2810.09
0
3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800
sample 5 1/cm
formulation blend show all characteristic peaks Differential scanning calorimetry study
Cinnarizine and solid dispersion and it indicates The DSC thermo gram of Cinna rizine, Soluplus,
that there is no interaction between solid dispersion solid dispersion prepared by solvent evaporation
and Kyron T 314. method and its overlapped as shown in figure
no.8-11 respectively
0.00
Onset 0
25. 32x
C10
0
Endset 0
-104. 72x
C10 Peak 121.27x
C10
Onset 0
118.39x
C10
Trans it ion 0
1.50x
mW10
0 Endset 0
125.34x
C10
0.30x
mW10 / m g
0
Mid Point 0
25. 03x
C10 Heat -347. 58x
mJ10
-5.00 0
Height -13. 67x
mW10
-10.00
50.00 100.00
Temp [C]
-1.00
Onset 0
34. 28x
C10
-2.00 Endset 0
41. 93x
C10
0
Trans it ion 0.01x
mW10
0
0.00x
mW10 / m g
0
-3.00 Mid Point 36. 19x
C10
Peak 0
81. 03x
C10
0
Onset 72. 00x
C10
0
Endset 87. 91x
C10
-4.00 Heat 0
-31. 36x
mJ10
Height 0
-0. 48x
mW10
-5.00
-6.00
40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00
T emp [C]
-2. 00
0
Peak 93.48x
C 10
Onset 0
87.77x
C 10
Endset 0
99.91x
C 10
-4. 00 H eat - 19.090
x10
mJ
0
Onset 38.13x
C 10 0
H eig ht - 0.40x
mW10
0
Endset 46.34x
C 10 Peak 0
115.95x
C 10
Tr ansition 0
0.73x
mW10 0
Onset 111.29x
C 10
0
0.15x
mW/mg
10 0
-6. 00 Endset 119.34x
C 10
M id Point 0
47.59x
C 10 H eat - 246.410
x10
mJ
H eig ht 0
- 7.82x
mW10
-8. 00
D SC
0. 00
Onset 0
38.93x
C 10
-5. 00 0 Peak 0
115.95x
C 10
Endset 46.24x
C 10
0
Onset 111.26x
C 10 0
Tr ansition 0
0.64x
mW10 Peak 121.27x
C 10
0 Endset 0
119.39x
C 10
0.13x
mW/mg
10 Onset 0
118.36x
C 10
M id Point 0
46.47x
C 10 H eat - 241.310
x10
mJ 0
Endset 125.18x
C 10
H eig ht - 7.770
x10
mW
H eat - 344.210
x10
mJ
-10. 00 H eig ht - 13.630
x10
mW
M ixtur e D SC
C innar izine DSC
Fig 11: DSC Thermogram of Cinnarizine and solid dispersion (1:3) overlapped
From the figure no.8 the Cinnarizine showed the dissolution apparatus at 50 rpm in 900 ml pH 1.2
melting point at 121C, from figure no.9 Soluplus buffer solution as a dissolution medium.
showed the melting point at 81C, from figure Temperature of dissolution medium was
no.10 the solid dispersion showed the melting point maintained at 37 0.50C. PD 25 mg and PMs and
reduced to 115C from 121C and the intensity of SDs equivalent to 25 mg of Cinnarizine were added
the peak in pure drug is reduced. From the figure in each vessels. 5ml sample withdrawn at regular
no.11 it can be concluded that there is a formation time interval of 3 min and filtered through
of solid dispersion with conversion of drug Whatman filter paper. An equal volume of fresh
crystalline to amorphous form. dissolution medium was added in order to kept
total volume of dissolution medium constant.
Dissolution study Filtered samples absorbance was measured at 254
In order to investigate the release rate of PD, PMs nm and results are shown in table no 5-6and figure
and SDs with Soluplus in the ratio 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 no12-13.
were subjected to dissolution study in USP type II
Table 5: Results of percentage cumulative drug release of PD, PMs with Soluplus
Time (min) PD PM 1:1 PM 1:2 PM 1:3
0 0 0 0 0
3 10.5460.5339 10.72230.1555 11.44650.3905 12.63610.4741
6 14.81640.4123 16.93710.3236 18.59630.4970 19.99940.3558
12 17.03590.8688 20.72690.4764 23.53030.5437 26.80150.3210
15 20.90660.6491 26.01061.1239 28.31720.8966 32.58631.118
18 25.78010.5563 33.55020.7962 34.85590.4669 38.66621.1249
21 31.14030.4715 39.73430.3302 40.68320.7665 44.66821.1813
24 35.91840.0784 44.86561.655 47.14131.5349 52.05031.2690
27 44.60761.005 55.53061.312 60.56881.1986 67.45070.6648
30 49.4320.4227 61.02570.9124 66.66990.8894 75.91670.4513
Mean, SD, n= 3
Mean, SD, n= 3
Evaluation of solid dispersion tablet parameters to study the flow properties of granules
Pre compression evaluation of tablet blend. angle of repose, mean bulk density, mean tapped
Formulations ready for compression containing density, carrs index, hausners ratio as shown in
solid dispersion of Cinnarizine and various table no.7
excipients were subjected for pre-compression
Table 7: Evaluation of precompression parameters of orodispersible tablets containing Cinnarizine solid
dispersion.
Formulation Angle of Bulk Density Tapped Density Carrs Index Hausners
Code Repose(0) (g/cm2) (g/cm2) (%) Ratio
F1 25.1033 0.8048 0.9260 13.08 1.1506
0.9042 0.0108 0.0102 0.3592 0.0047
F2 24.73 0.8217 0.9460 13.14 1.1514
0.4430 0.0232 0.0180 0.7950 0.0104
F3 23.9733 0.7954 0.9158 13.04 1.1500
0.9957 0.0113 0.0135 0.2655 0.035
F4 23.7833 0.7997 0.9158 12.68 1.1452
1.008 0.0157 0.0134 0.5167 0.0067
Mean, SD, n= 3
Formulation design: Post compression parameters:
The present study was carried out to develop The tablets prepared by direct compression
orodispersible tablets of Cinnarizine solid technique were subjected for evaluation according
dispersion (1:3) in order to improve patient to various official specifications and other
compliance and also to prepare user-friendly parameters like shape and color, thickness,
formulations. In this case, four formulations of diameter, hardness, friability, weight variation, in-
orodispersible tablets were prepared by direct vitro disintegration time, wetting time, water
compression method using superdisintegrant Kyron absorption ratio, dispersion time, drug content and
T 314. The detailed composition of each in- vitro dissolution studies as shown in table no.8
formulation is given in the table no.1. to 10 and figure no.14.
Table 8: Evaluation of post compression parameters of orodispersible tablets containing Cinnarizine solid
dispersion.
Formulation Hardness Thickness Weight Drug
Code (kg/cm 2) (mm) Diameter Friability Variation Content
n=5 n=20 (mm) (%) (mg) (%)
n=20 n=20 n=3
F1 3.90 4.94 7.49 0.5616 199.7 99.10
0.100 0.0228 0.0058 1.1742 0.6100
F2 3.78 4.96 7.49 0.4117 200.25 99.44
0.0836 0.0329 0.0044 1.4823 0.5086
F3 3.84 4.94 7.5 0.4723 200.15 99.60
0.1341 0.0290 0.0064 1.3518 0.4000
F4 3.86 4.96 7.49 0.4419 200 99.81
0.1140 0.0372 0.0075 1.0760 3987
Table 9: Evaluation of post compression parameters of orodispersible tablets containing Cinnarizine solid
dispersion.
Formulation code Wetting time (sec) Dispersion time Water absorption Disintegration time
(sec) ratio (%) (sec)
Dissolution study of formulated tablet min. The percent cumulative drug release rate of
The formulated tablets were subjected to formulation F1 was 99.14 0.4240 % in 24 min.
dissolution study in USP type II dissolution F2 was 99.49 0.4672 %in 21 min, 99.4461
apparatus at 50 rpm in 900 ml pH 1.2 buffer 0.2273 % in 18 min and F4 was 99.7582 0.6297
solution as a dissolution medium. Temperature of % in 15 min. Among all these formulations F4 is
dissolution medium was maintained at 37 0.50C. best due to percent cumulative drug release that is
Orodispersible tablet equivalent to 25 mg of 99.7582 % in 15 min.
Cinnarizine were added in each vessels. 5 ml From the results of dissolution studies, the
sample withdrawn at regular time interval of 3 min, formulation F4 is selected as a final formulation
filtered through Whatman filter paper. An equal and compared with marketed tablet.
volume of fresh dissolution medium was added in
order to kept total volume of dissolution medium
constant. Filtered samples absorbance was
measured at 254 nm and results are shown in table
no 10 and figure no14.
The orodispersible tablet containing Cinnarizine
solid dispersion prepared with Soluplus by solvent
evaporation method in ratio 1:3 showed better
percent cumulative drug release in less than 30
Table 10: Results of percentage cumulative drug release of orodispersible tablet formulations F1-F4
Mean, SD, n=3
Time (min) F1 F2 F3 F4
0 0 0 0 0
3 27.45250.2688 28.77410.3583 31.9810.4655 34.94650.3905
6 35.64790.4756 36.48590.2682 44.15860.7357 49.65230.2358
9 46.62620.2366 47.98430.6224 57.42830.4733 70.99950.4751
12 59.76270.9956 60.86960.3233 71.8480.4733 88.68551.013
15 73.07410.6237 76.11740.6058 84.75740.7862 99.75820.6297
18 86.40590.8609 88.0010.2340 99.44610.2273 -
21 96.60270.8748 99.4980.4672 - -
24 99.14750.4240 - - -
compatibility study, the FTIR spectra of Formulation of orodispersible tablet by using solid
formulation blend shows all characteristic peaks of dispersion of Cinnarizine is unique technique by
Cinnarizine and SD1:3 and it indicates that there is which solubility and bioavailability of drug can be
no any significance interaction between SD1:3 and enhanced with improving patient compliance and
Kyron T 314. convenience.
The blends of all the formulations were evaluated It can be concluded that combination of solid
for pre-compression parameters like angle of dispersion and superdisintegrant is a promising
repose, bulk density, tapped density, carrs index approach to prepare efficient orodispersible tablet
and housners ratio. The results that are obtained of BCS class II drug (low solubility, high
for formulation F1-F4 shows good compression permeability).
and flow property. The prepared tablets were Standardized orodispersible tablet formulation F4
subjected for post-compression parameters. The was found to be stable after three month
results for all formulations possessed good accelerated stability study.
mechanical strength with sufficient hardness in the Thus, the objectives of the research work were
range of 3.78 to 3.90 kg/cm2. The percent friability successfully achieved.
was found to be 0.4117 to 0.5616 which is less than
1m% indicating tablets were mechanically stable. REFERENCES:
All formulations show 199.7 to 200.25 mg/tablet 1.Das Sanjoy Kumar, Roy Sudipta, Yuvaraja
weight, which complies with pharmacopeias limit. Kalimuthu, Khanam Jasmina, Nanda Arunabha.
Drug contents were found to be within Solid dispersions: An approach to enhance the
pharmacopeias limit. The wetting time, dispersion bioavailability of poorly water soluble drugs,
time, disintegration time for all formulations was International Journal of Pharmacology and
found to be 14.0 to 31.33 sec., 19.33 to 34.33 sec. Pharmaceutical Technology, Vol.-I, Issue-1, p.37-
and 13.0 to 26.16 sec. It is decreasing wetting, 46.
dispersion and disintegration time with increasing 2.Sharma D, Soni M, Kumar S, Gupta GD.
concentration of Kyron T-314. Solubility enhancement eminent role in poorly
The in-vitro dissolution profiles were indicates soluble drugs. Research Journal of Pharma and
faster and maximum drug release from all Tech, 2009; 2 (2), p. 220-224.
formulations F1 to F4. F1 shows 99.1475 0.4240 3.Patel T, Patel L, Patel T, Makwana S, Patel T.
% in 24 min., F2 shows 99.498 0.4672 % in 21 Enhancement of dissolution of Fenofibrate by solid
min., F3 shows 99.4461 0.2273 % in 18 min and dispersion technique. International Journal
F4 shows 99.7582 0.6297 % in 15 min. Based on Research and Pharm Science 2010; 1(2), p. 127-
obtained results, the formulation F4 is selected as a 132.
best formulation and which is compared with 4.IlseWeuts, Dieter Kempena, Geert Verreck,
marketed formulation. Percent drug release of JefPeeters, Marcus Brewster, Norbert Blaton,. Salt
marketed formulation in 15 min was 66.9272 formation in solid dispersions consisting of
0.2321 % and F4 formulation was 99.7582 polyacrylic acid as a carrier and three basic model
0.6297 %. compounds resulting in very high glass transition
The prepared orodispersible tablet of Cinnarizine temperatures and constant dissolution properties
solid dispersion has shown better release and upon storage. European Journal of Pharmaceutical
stability as compared to marketed formulation. Science, 2005; 25, p. 387393.
The conclusions from present research work are as 5.Bramhmankar DM, Jaiswal SB,
follows: Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics- A
The use of Soluplus for obtaining solid dispersion Treatise, Vallabh Prakashan, Second edition, p. 24-
of Cinnarizine proved successful. 30, 314-336.
The significance increase in solubility and 6.Dhirendra K, Lewis S, Udupa N. Solid
dissolution was observed from solid dispersion dispersions: A review, Pak Journal of
containing Cinnarizine and Soluplus in 1:3 ratio Pharmaceutical Science, Vol 22, April 2009; p.
prepared by solvent evaporation method as 234-246.
compared to pure drug, physical mixtures and other 7.Kuchekar BS, Aruagam VA. Review: Fast
solvent evaporation method dispersions. dissolving tablets. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical
Soluplus as a solid dispersion carrier imparts good Education, 2001; 35, p. 150-152.
surface adsorbent property and leaves drug in 8.Lindgreen S, Janzon L. Dysphagia: Prevalence of
amorphous state that increases the surface area, due swallowing complaints and clinical findings.
to enhances the dissolution rate. Medical Clinic of North America. 1993; 77, p. 3-5.
Formulation of orodispersible tablet of Cinnarizine 9.Bangale GS, Shinde GV, Stephen B. New
solid dispersion (1:3) by using Kyron T- 314 generation of orodispersible tablets: recent
showed rapid in-vitro disintegration and dispersion advances and future prospects, International
time.