Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Scale Quality
1.1. Prepared180daily 5 All daily lesson plans had
lesson plan and daily the following parts:
logs of activities within Objective,
the rating period Content,Learning
Resources, Procedures,
Remarks, Reflection
Scale Quality
5 Instructional Competence
shows an Overall Rating
of Five (5) Outstanding
1.2 Facilitated learning
in school/classes
evaluated with 10%
functional lesson/daily June 2016-
logs and innovative April 2017 4 Instructional Competence
teaching strategies shows an Overall Rating
through an observer of Four (4) VS
with the use of
Instructional
Supervision Tool (IST) 1
Observation per
grading period.
3 Instructional Competence
shows an Overall Rating
of Three (3) S
1 Instructional Competence
shows an Overall Rating
of One (1) Poor
Scale Quality
5 Conducted interventions
such as ADM, DLP, etc
and other similar
programs
June 2016-
April 2017 5% 4 Conducted home
visitations to parents of
1.4 Monitored the SARDO
checking of attendance
and it was 100% - Has 1 dropout of all
systematically carried classes handled
out through the
submission of Form 2 3 Conducted school
and Daily attendance of conferences to parents of
students. Has Zero SARDO
dropout rate.
-Has 2 dropouts of all
classes handled
2 Identified Students At Risk
of Dropping Out (SARD)
but no action taken
1 Have no intervention at
all
Scale Quality
1.5 Monitored safe, 5 Overall (1)physical
positive and motivating atmosphere,(2)
environment, overall cleanliness and
physical atmosphere orderliness of classroom,
conducive for learning, (3) toilet (4)assigned
cleanliness and area, (5) proper waste
orderliness of classroom disposal were maintained
including proper waste
disposal daily and was
observed to have at
least Good(3) rating
every month within the
rating period
June 2016-
April 2017
2 Only 2 of the five areas
were maintained
2 2% increase in MPS
1 1% increase in MPS
/maintained previous SYs
NAT result, or decreased
Scale Quality
June 2016- 5 Achieved 90-100 GSA
April 2017 5% (outstanding) of all
4 students handled
Achieved 85-89 GSA (Very
Satisfactory) of all
students handled
5 Conducted parent-
conference with complete
documentation:
3.1 Conducted at least
4 parent conferences to
students needing
academic and June 2016- (Communication Letter/
behavioral help. April 2017 5% Attendance Sheet/Minutes
4 of the Meeting
Conducted )
parent-
conference with one
lacking document
3 Conducted parent-
conference with two
lacking documents
2 Conducted parent-
conference with only one
document/MOV
1 Have not conducted at all
Scale Quality
5 Accomplishments of set
visits with complete
components
3%
(identification of
needs/problems, causes,
3.2 Conducted at least
recommendation, and
4 Home visitation to
agreement)
students needing
academic monitoring
and follow up within the
rating period
4 Conducted parent-
3.2 Conducted at least conference with
4 Home visitation to document lacking one
students needing component
academic monitoring
and follow up within the
rating period
3 Conducted parent-
conference with
document lacking two
components
2 Conducted parent-
conference with
document lacking three
components
Scale Quality
5 Accomplishments of
June 2016- Initiated projects/
April 2017 2% events/activities with
(Activity
external Proposal,
Attendance,
funding/sponsorship have
Accomplishment Report,
complete documentation
Cert. of Completion,
Letter, Pictures)
3.3 Initiated 1
project/events/activities
with external funding or
sponsorship within the
target date /
participated in 3
community extension
services
4 Conducted parent-
3.3 Initiated 1 conference with
project/events/activities document lacking one
with external funding or component
sponsorship within the
target date /
participated in 3
community extension
services
3 Conducted parent-
conference with
document lacking two
2 Conducted
componentsparent-
conference with
document lacking three
components
Professional Growth
and Development
10%
Scale Quality
5 Action Research
May 2016- conducted with full
April 2017 2% documentation and
4 recognized
Action by the School
Research
Head
conducted with full
4.1 Conducted 1 action documentation
research based on recognized by the Master
students need analysis Teacher/Dept.Head
using only 1-5 Action
Research Template.
3 Action Research with full
documentation
recognized by the other
teacher
2 Identified classroom /
learning problems with
research proposals
Scale Quality
5 Attended at the
5% International or national
4 level (seminars relevant
May 2016-
April 2017 to the assigned task/
Attended at the 1 regional
subject or expertise)
level / (2 division Level
4.2 Attended at least 4
seminars/training at
the school, cluster and 3
Attended at the 1 division
division level, region, level / (2 cluster/ district
and national level level) / (3 school level)
within the rating period
2
Attended at the cluster /
district level / (2 school
level)
Personnel
Administration 10%
Scale Quality
Scale Quality
5 Incurred no
tardiness/undertime
4 Incurred 1 tardy or 1
undertime for personal
reasons
4%
3 Incurred 2 tardiness/
undertime (or
5.2 Complied 180 days combination) for personal
of attendance without 2 reasons
Incurred 3-5 tardiness/
tardiness and/or under undertime (or
time and reports on combination) for personal
time reasons
1 Incurred 6 or more
tardiness/ undertime (or
combination) for personal
reasons
Scale Quality
5 Complete prescribed
2% uniform
4 One element missing (e.g.
no ID)
3 Two elements missing
Efficiency Timeliness
130% and above of the 130% of the DLL 5 4.8 5
required number of days submitted on time or
DLL/Lesson Plan Submitted before the deadline
4.9333 0.49
115-129% of the required Submitted 1 day after
number of days DLL/Lesson the prescribe dates
Plan Submitted
100-114% of the required Submitted 2 days
number of days DLL/Lesson after the prescribe
Plan Submitted dates
Efficiency Timeliness
4.6667
The classroom was
observed (2)Basic
4.7
Evidences showed that the with two weeks
teacher submitted only 2 lapses
out of 4 indicators per
subject / grading period
4.6667
100-114%of the students Conducted two weeks
who were under after the time frame
remediation have improved in every quarter
their performance with a
passing grade in the
Remedial Class Mark /
enhancement report
3 0.3
Two of the required students Sometimes observed
records are Lacking
Efficiency Timeliness
130% of the students Submitted Grading
passed the subject at the Sheets, Class Record
end of the school
115-129% year
of the students before the Grading
Submitted deadline 4 5 4.8 0.23
passed the subject at the Sheets, Class Record
end of the school year during the deadline
4.6
100-114% of the students Submitted Grading
passed the subject at the Sheets, Class Record
end of the school year a day after the
deadline
51-99% of the students Submitted Grading
passed the subject at the Sheets, Class Record
end of the school year two days after the
deadline
Efficiency Timeliness
Efficiency
130% and above initiated Organized and
projects/events/activities facilitated on the
conducted prescribed dates
Conducted 4-5 Home Organized and 4 5 4
visitation and students were facilitated one day
given intervention and after prescribed dates
showed a passing grade in
the remedial class mark
4.3333 0.086666667
Conducted 2-3Home Organized and
visitation and students were facilitated two days
given intervention and after prescribed dates
Conducted 1 Homegrade in
showed a passing Organized and
visitation and students
the remedial class markwere facilitated three days
given intervention and after prescribed dates
showed a passing grade in
the remedial class mark
Efficiency Timeliness
Efficiency Timeliness
Reported 130% and above Arrived 15 minutes 3 4 4 0.15
days to school/ mandated before the official
meetings/ special activities time
3.67
Reported 115-129% days to Arrived 10-14
school/ mandated meetings/ minutes before the
special activities official time
2
5 5 4 4.66667 4.66667
Practices ethical and professional behavior and
2 conduct taking into account the impact of his/her Takes personal responsibilty for dealing
actions and decisions. with and/or correcting costumer service
issues and concerns
3
Maintains professional image: being trustworthy,
3 regularity of attendance and punctuality, good 5 5 4 Initiates activities that promotes
grooming and communication. advocacy for men and women
4.66667 empowerment.
4
Participates in updating of office vision,
Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's
4 5 5 4 mission, mandates & strategies based on
needs.
DepEd strategies and directions.
4.67
5
Develops and adopts service
Acts with a sense pf urgency and responsibility to
improvement programs through
5 meet the organization's needs, improves systems 5 5 4
simplified procedures that will further
and help others improve their effectiveness.
enhance service delivery.
4.66667
Result Focus RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE Innovation
Examines the root cause of problems and
1 suggests effective solutions. Fosters new
Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources
1 4 4 4 ideas, processes, and suggests bettter ways
most of the time.
4 to do things (cost and/or operational
2 efficiency).
Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond
Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective
the box". Continuously focuses on
2 work methods by placing organizational needs before 5 5 4 4.666667 4.60
improving personal productivity to create
personal needs.
higher value and results.
4
4
Expresses a desire to do better and may express Translates creative thinking into tangible
4 frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new or 5 5 4 changes and solutions that improve the
more precise ways of meeting goals set. work unit and organization.
4.666667
5
5
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates
Note: These ratings can be used for the developmental plans of the employee.
DEPED RPMS form -
MELANIE C. MIJARES
MT - I
APRIL 17,2017
4 4 4
4
5 5 4.66667 3.4667
4 4 4
4
5 5 4
4.66667
4 4 4
4
RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE
4 4 4
4
4.2
5 4 4 4.3
5 5 4
4.66667
4 4 4
4.0
4 4 4
4
RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE
4 4 4
4
4 4 4 4 2.4
4 4 4
3
DEPED form -Teachers
RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE
4.4
5 5 4 4.66667
4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4
5 5 4 4.66667
5 5 4 4.66667
4.44
4.16
4.30
Final Performance
Results
Accomplishments of Rating Adjectival Rating
KRAs and Objectives 4.30 VERY SATISFACTORY
Rater-Ratee Agreement
Name of employee: LEONORA C. OCULARES Name of Superior:
Signature Signature