Você está na página 1de 5

Aeschlimann 1

Logan Aeschlimann

Mrs. Harris

English IV

3 May 2017

Embryo Mapping

Late one night a woman is driving home on the freeway, shes hit head on by a drunk

driver and killed. The man is charged with two accounts of murder; the woman, and her four-

week-old embryo inside her. By law, everyone human being is guaranteed rights of life; born or

unborn they are equal. The same law should be enforced concerning human embryonic stem cell

research. Dr. James A. Thomson discovered stem cells in 1998 and theyve intrigued scientist

ever since. The stem cells themselves are derived from a three to four day old cluster of cells

called a blastocyst and they are so coveted because they are pluripotent, meaning they can

differentiate into any type of cell in the human body. Although embryonic stem cells show

amazing potential to cure various disease such as cancer, congestive heart failure, Alzheimers

and Parkinsons disease, muscular dystrophies, and more. The methods by which they are

obtained is controversial. Research on embryonic stem cells is unethical, unnecessary, and purely

homicide.

Unquestionably, stem cell research is unethical on multiple accounts. Firstly, embryos are

human beings and even though theyre a few days old they are not a pre-embryo, a term stating

that after conception, the embryo was actually not an embryo. Thankfully, that term is now

known as scientifically invalid. As soon as the DNA is fully operational its human, embryos

arent merely biological tissues or clusters of cells; they are the tiniest of human beings

(C.B.H.D. 2). Additionally, research on embryos is a violation of human rights and there is no
Aeschlimann 2

greater good by doing so in the name of medicine. There have been gross violations of human

rights in the past and destruction of an embryo to salvage stem cells breaking the law. Even with

the potential of stem cells, the moral costs of continuing such research outweighs any potential

benefits (Reaves 2). Most importantly, taking a life in order to save on defeats all purposes of

human ethics. Some stem cells have even been manually cultivated in a lab specifically to

dismantle and acquire stem cells, an abhorrent abuse of human embryos. Using HESCs (human

embryonic stem cells) is barbaric and cold-hearted; there is no need to destroy a life to save

another.

In fact, further research on embryonic stem cells is unnecessary because of the promising

signs of adult stem cells. Particularly in their versatility; once thought to be omnipotent,

continued studies have shown somatic, or adult, cells to be pluripotent. These are less

controversial because they are extracted through tissue samples and not destruction of an embryo

and are stored in every humans body. These new findings are so encouraging that human

embryonic stem cells may soon be eclipsed by more readily available and less controversial adult

stem cells (Human Embryos 1 from British Medical Journal 1999). Also, there are several forms

of adult stem cells namely; bone marrow, hematopoietic cells, umbilical cord, Mesenchymal

cells, and fetal bone marrow stem cells. Fetal bone marrow cells show the most potential and

researchers at John Hopkins University believe that adult stem cells may be used for treatments

such as cancer, congestive heart failure, muscular dystrophies, spinal cord damage, etc

(C.B.H.D. 3). Adult stem cells are the future of modern medicine. Indeed, some forms of adult

stem cells have already been used in clinical trials on patients with Leukemia and gene therapy

treatments. Furthermore, adult stem cells show the greatest potential because of their side effects,

or lack of them. Because they originate inside the patients body there is less of a risk for the
Aeschlimann 3

immune system to reject the transplantation. And as scientists continue to discover the mysteries

of adult stem cells many medicinal issues with become obsolete. Interestingly, researchers at

Harvard University reported that they changed one type of adult cell into another live human

being. If this reversion process were successful, it would remove critical moral and ethical

objections.

Above all, destroying a human embryo to harvest stem cells is pure homicide. Due to the

fact that embryos are defenseless and they deserve every right a human being is given. According

to current legislation homicide laws of all 50 states protect human life . . . especially the

vulnerable (Human Embryos 1), and embryos are clearly vulnerable. Non pro-life advocates

need to understand that embryonic stem cell research is the destruction of human life and that

every embryo has the potential to grow into a fully developed adult. Why sacrifice a baby for the

sake of medicine? Pope John Paul II put it best, stating, America can show the world the path to

a truly humane future in which man remains the master, not the product, of his technology

(Issitt 9). Essentially, the United States should not be enslaved to the continual progress of the

greater good. Full support is offered to further research on adult stem cells but research on

embryonic stem cells is manslaughter.

Most importantly, research on human embryos is unethical, unnecessary, and murder.

With the current ban on embryonic stem cell research federal funding has been declined, and for

good reasons, scientists should look into adult stem cells and their promises. Although, thought

to be the most valuable, embryonic stem cells are too controversial and the methods are

horrendous at best. The US federal government shouldnt condone or pay for further funding on

HESCs but rather somatic stem cells. Every human is guaranteed equal rights, born or unborn

and every man is created equal. We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more
Aeschlimann 4

perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense,

promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,

do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Works Citied
Aeschlimann 5

"AAAS - Center for Science, Technology and Congress." AAAS - The World's Largest General

Scientific Society. 13 Oct. 2010. Web. 20 Apr. 2011.

"An Overview of Stem Cell Research | The Center for Bioethics & Human Dignity." The Center

for Bioethics & Human Dignity (C.B.H.D.). Web. 19 Apr. 2011.

Farrell, Courtney, and Rosalyn Carson-Dewitt. "Stem Cell Research: An Overview." Points of

View: Stem Cell Research (2009): 1. EBSCO. Web. 18 Apr. 2011.

Issitt, Micah, and Matt Donnely. "Counterpoint: Stem Cell Research Is Dangerous, Unethical,

and Ineffective." Points of View: Stem Cell Research (2009): 3. EBSCO. Web. 18 Apr.

2011.

Reaves, Jessica. "The Great Debate Over Stem Cell Research - TIME." Breaking News,

Analysis, Politics, Blogs, News Photos, Video, Tech Reviews - TIME.com. 11 July 2001.

Web. 19 Apr. 2011.

"What Are Embryonic Stem Cells? [Stem Cell Information]." NIH Stem Cell Information Home

Page. 13 Sept. 2010. Web. 20 Apr. 2011.

Você também pode gostar