Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
abstract
Self-determination theory (SDT) assumes that inherent in human nature is the
propensity to be curious about ones environment and interested in learning and
developing ones knowledge. All too often, however, educators introduce external
controls into learning climates, which can undermine the sense of relatedness
between teachers and students, and stifle the natural, volitional processes involved
in high-quality learning. This article presents an overview of SDT and reviews its
applications to educational practice. A large corpus of empirical evidence based
on SDT suggests that both intrinsic motivation and autonomous types of extrinsic
motivation are conducive to engagement and optimal learning in educational
contexts. In addition, evidence suggests that teachers support of students basic
psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness facilitates stud-
ents autonomous self-regulation for learning, academic performance, and well-
being. Accordingly, SDT has strong implications for both classroom practice and
educational reform policies.
[133]
[134]
[135]
[136]
f i g u r e 1 The internalization continuum depicting the various types of extrinsic motivation posited
within self-determination theory
Perceived
locus of External Somewhat Somewhat Internal
casuality external internal
[137]
[138]
[139]
[140]
references
Bandura, A. (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory, American
Psychologist 44: 117584.
Benware, C.A. and Deci, E.L. (1984) Quality of learning with an active versus
passive motivational set, American Educational Research Journal 21: 75565.
Black, A.E. and Deci, E.L. (2000) The effects of instructors autonomy support
and students autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-
determination theory perspective, Science Education 84: 74056.
Burton, K.D., Lydon, J.E., DAlessandro, D.U. and Koestner, R. (2006) The
differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and
performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-
determination theory, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91: 75062.
Chirkov, V.I. and Ryan, R.M. (2001) Parent and teacher autonomy-support in
Russian and U.S. adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic
motivation, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32: 61835.
deCharms, R. (1968) Personal Causation. New York: Academic Press.
Deci, E.L., Koestner, R. and Ryan, R.M. (1999) A meta-analytic review of
experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation,
Psychological Bulletin 125: 62768.
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in
Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
[141]
[142]
biographical notes
c h r i s t o p h e r p . n i e m i e c is currently a graduate student in Clinical and
Social Sciences in Psychology at the University of Rochester. His program of
research is centered on the basic principles and applications of self-determination
theory. His primary research interests focus on the dynamics among, and
functions of, basic psychological needs; life goals and wellness; and health-
behavior change. In the fall of 2009, he will begin a position as Visiting Assistant
[143]
[144]