Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Meher Prasad
Department of Civil Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
email: prasadam@iitm.ac.in
Dynamic - Loads change with time
Nonlinear - Loaded beyond Elastic Limit
Roof-top Displacement
Design Spectra Representation
Co
V/W (Acceleration) V/W (Acceleration) nst
an
tP
er
io
d
Li
ne
s
Nonlinear
Nonlinear Analysis
Analysis software
software with
with built-in
built-in push-over
push-over analysis
analysis capabilities
capabilities
zz DRAIN
DRAIN Spread
Spread Plasticity
Plasticity
zz IDARC
IDARC Spread
Spread and
and Point
Point Plasticity
Plasticity
zz SAP2000NL
SAP2000NL Point
Point Plasticity
Plasticity
zz ETABS
ETABS Point
Point Plasticity
Plasticity
zz ANSYS
ANSYS Spread
Spread Plasticity
Plasticity
zz SAVE
SAVE Point
Point Plasticity
Plasticity (Public
(Public version)
version)
Spread
Spread Plasticity
Plasticity (Research
(Research version)
version)
Sequential
Sequential application
application of
of linear
linear analysis
analysis software
software
Spread and Point Plasticity
Plastic Hinge
eff = 0 + 0.05
It is most common to keep the load shape constant during the push.
0.14 Uniform
parabola
0.12
0.1
Vb/W
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
/H(%)
Adapting Load Patterns
No building
building can
can be
be displaced
displaced to infinity without damage.
N-A 1- A
2- A NR NR NR NR
Operational Operational
1- B
N-B
Immediate 2- B 3- B NR NR NR
Immediate Occupancy
Occupancy
N-C 3- C
1- C 2- C 4- C 5- C 6- C
Life Safety Life Safety
N-D
NR 2- D 3- D 4- D 5- D 6- D
Hazards Reduced
5-E
N-E No
NR NR 3-E 4-E Collapse
Not Considered rehabilitation
Prevention
2% 50 2475
Maximum considered (MCE) earthquake -2 Extremely
2500
(alternate) rare
10% 250 2373
Performance Objectives (FEMA 356)
Target building performance level
Probability of
Earthquake levels Exceedance
Opera- Immediate Life Collapse
in a period
tional Occupancy Safety Prevention
Serviceability
50% in 50 years
earthquake - 1 a b c d
Serviceability
20% in 50 years
earthquake - 2 e f g h
Example:
Ultimate Capacity
Force or Moment
Lateral Force
Modeled with
failures ignored
Actual
Displacement or Curvature
Displacement
6. Pay attention to rebar development and
lap lengths.
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05 IDARC
SAP
Vb/W
0.16g
0
0.25g
-0.008 -0.006 -0.004 -0.002 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008
0.3g
-0.05 0.35g
-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
/H
10. Three-dimensional buildings may require
more than a planar push.
SAP2000 NL
Pushover Analysis Procedure
Concrete Properties
Knowledge Factors, mk
No Description of available information mk
1 Original construction documents, including material testing 1.0
report
2 Documentation as in (1) but no material testing undertaken 0.9
3 Documentation as in (2) and minor deteriorations of original 0.8
condition
4 Incomplete but usable original construction documents 0.7
5 Documentation as in (4) and limited inspection and material 0.6
test results with large variation.
6 Little knowledge about the details of components 0.5
Material Properties
Frame Elements
Infill (struts)
Modeling of Structural elements
Foundation
Isolated footings Hinged at the bottom of foundation
3D Frame Elements
T-Beam 0.7 Ig
L-Beam 0.6 Ig
Columns 0.7 Ig
Modeling of Beams
Modeling of Columns
Modeling of Beam Column Joints
BEAM
y
x
MASTER NODE
L
Beam elements with rigid ends
Modeling of Shear Wall (Lift Core )
Type II Model - Single Lift Core Column
The lift core can be treated as a single column with master node
defined at the centroid and the beams connected by rigid links
BEAM
SLAVE NODE
Modeling of Shear Wall
(Lift Core Column Properties)
For axial and torsional rigidity, the full cross-sectional area should be
used
BEAM
y
x CORE MASTER NODE
FOR
A, J
SLAVE NODE
Modeling of Shear Wall
(Lift Core Column Properties)
For shear along y axis and bending about x-axis (ground motion
along y-axis), the walls in the direction of ground motion should be
considered as two parallel elements
BEAM
y
FOR
Ay, Ixx
SLAVE NODE
Modeling of Shear Wall
(Lift Core Column Properties)
For shear along x axis and bending about y-axis (ground motion
along x-axis), the walls in the direction of ground motion should be
considered as three parallel elements
BEAM
y
FOR
Ax, Iyy
SLAVE NODE
Beam Hinge Properties - Flexural hinge (M3)
Hinge Properties for Beams
b
a
Lateral Load
1.0 C
B
D E
c
A y
Lateral Deformation
Generalized Load
Deformation Relations
* ATC 40 Volume 1
Beam Hinge Properties - Shear hinge
Beam Hinge Properties - Shear hinge
Shear capacity
Shear strength (V)
d
V sy = f y A sv Vy
Vu = 1.05Vy
0 .6 s v
=0
Residual
0.2 Vy
Total Shear Capacity, Vy = Vc + Vsy Shear Strength
y 1.5y m=15y
Shear deformation ()
b
a
Lateral Load
1.0 C
B
D E
c
A y
Lateral Deformation
* ATC 40 Volume 1
Column Hinge Properties- Shear hinge
Column Hinge Properties- Shear hinge
Shear capacity
0.8 f ck ( 1 + 5 1)
c =
6
0.116 f ck bd
w h ere = 1.0
100 A st
3Pu
= 1+ 1.5 Note:
Ag f ck
For moderate and high ductility of the
Vc = c bd column section
d
V sy = f y A sv =
3 Pu
0 .5
0 .6 s v A g f ck
Total Shear Capacity, Vy= Vc + Vsy is taken in calculation (ATC 40)
Column Hinge Properties- Shear hinge
Residual Shear
0.2 Vy Strength
y 1.5 m=15y
yShear deformation
()
Fundamental 0 . 09 h Q3
Ta =
natural period d
Design Base VB = Ah W
Shear Q2
Design Lateral Wi hi
2
Qi = VB
W j hj
2
Force
Q1
Static Pushover Case Data
(Lateral pushover Displacement controlled)
Seismic Evaluation of a
Typical RC Building
Building Data
n Storey number
Beams (only in 1 to 4 floor)
Plan - Column and Equivalent Strut
Locations
Static Design
Center of Mass Center of rigidity Eccentricity, esi Eccentricity, edi
Seismic Lumped (m) (m)
Floor Weight ( m) (m)
Mass
(kN) (Ton) X- Y- X- Y- X- Y- X- Y-
direction direction direction direction direction direction direction direction
5 3550 255 12.55 6.90 12.60 7.23 0.05 0.33 1.34 1.20
4 4175 306 12.55 7.15 12.60 7.23 0.05 0.08 1.34 0.82
3 4175 306 12.55 7.15 12.60 7.23 0.05 0.08 1.34 0.82
2 4175 306 12.55 7.15 12.60 7.23 0.05 0.08 1.34 0.82
1 3200 222 12.55 7.15 12.60 7.23 0.05 0.08 1.34 0.82
VB = 0.15 20270 kN
= 3039 kN
Comparison of Base Shear
Without infill
With infill stiffness
stiffness
Analysis methods
Vx (kN) Vy (kN) Vx (kN) Vy (kN)
Time Period (s) Tax= 0.28 Tay= 0.38 0.59 0.73 0.83
ey
ex
Pu
Puz
M2 M3 P M2 M3 MuR,x
A
Muy1
(kN) load
contour
M uR = M ux2 + M uy2
1C1 2871 236 207 1744 323 311 2.30 1712 342 338 2.49 Mux = Pu ex
1C2 3102 280 218 1534 433 334 2.60 1860 159 354 2.72
1C3 3070 250 242 2266 288 335 1.81 2400 310 354 1.95
1C4 3241 263 277 2614 414 350 1.84 2506 435 368 1.92
1C5 3301 296 253 1422 420 346 2.20 1546 445 365 2.36
2C4 3241 263 277 2355 416 270 1.57 2029 285 220 1.04
Demand and Capacity for Columns Shear
(Equivalent Static Method)
5 5
4 4
Storey Level
Storey Level
3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100
Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm)
16 16
14 14
12 12
10 10
8 8
6 6
4 4
2 2
0 0
0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60
-2
-2
In te r-store y dri ft ( X 10 %) Inter-store y drift ( X 10 %)
Q5= 15.22 5
Q4= 11.70 4
Q3= 6.83 3
Q2= 3.25 2
Q1= 1.00 1
Moment Rotation Curve for a Typical
Element
Hinge Property
1.2
C B Yield state
1
B
LS
CP IO Immediate Occupancy
0.8 IO
Moment/SF
Seismic Coefficient, CA
Zone II Zone III Zone IV Zone V
Soil
(0.10) (0.16) (0.24) (0.36)
Type I 0.10 0.16 0.24 0.36
Type II 0.10 0.16 0.24 0.36
Type III 0.10 0.16 0.24 0.36
Seismic Coefficient, CV
Type I 0.10 0.16 0.24 0.36
Type II 0.14 0.22 0.33 0.49
Type III 0.17 0.27 0.40 0.60
Base Shear Vs. Roof Displacement
Push X
4000
1.5VB = 2.41
3500 /h = 0.49%
3000
= 1.46
2500 /h = 0.34%
Base Shear (kN)
2000
1500
1000
Without infill
500 stiffness
With infill
stiffness
0
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10
Roof Displacement (m)
Base Shear Vs. Roof Displacement
Push Y
4000
1.5VB
3500
3000
2500
Base Shear (kN)
2000
1500
1000
Without infill
500 stiffness
With infill
stiffness
0
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10
Roof Displacement (m)
Capacity and Demand Spectra
(With infill stiffness)
1.0 1.0
Spectral Accelaration Coefficient
(Sa/g)
0.5
0.4 0.4
0.3
0.2 0.2
0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
Spectral Displacement (m) Spectral Displacement (m)
1.0 1.0
Spectral Accelaration Coefficient
(Sa/g)
0.5
0.4 0.4
0.3
0.2 0.2
0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
Spectral Displacement (m) Spectral Displacement (m)
9000
D
8000 C
7000
B
/h=0.75%
6000 A /h=0.48%
Base Shear (kN)
5000
/h=0.28% VB
4000
3000
2000
/h = 1 %
1000
0
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20
A, /h=0.28% B, /h=0.48%
State of the Hinge at C and D in Lateral load
C, /h=0.75% D, /h=1%
Performance Point ( Demand spectrum- Z )
0.9
Capacity Spectrum eff = 24.9%
0.8
Effective Period V = 7682 kN
0.7
D = 0.167 m = 0.93% of H
0.6
15% Sa = 0.29 m/s2
0.5
17.3% Sd = 0.11 m/s
0.4
0.3
Performance Point
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Spectral Displacement (m)
Storey Displacements
18
A B C D
15
12
H(m)
0
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20
Displacement (m)
IDI
5
B
A D
4
C
3
H(m)
0
0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020
IDI
What if Performance Point Does Not Exist?
FE ADD STRENGTH OR
STIFFNESS OR BOTH
V/W (Acceleration)
Roof-top Displacement
What if Performance Point Does Not Exist?
FE ENHANCE SYSTEM
DUCTILITY
V/W (Acceleration)
FI
Inelastic demand spectrum
capacity spectrum 5% damped elastic spectrum
Roof-top Displacement
What if Performance Point Does Not Exist?
FE
REDUCE SEISMIC DEMAND BY:
ADDING DAMPING OR ISOLATION
V/W (Acceleration)
FI
Roof-top Displacement