P-11 Darga Road, Park Circus

Kolkata 700 017

Phone (91) (033) 40109797/2280 7430
STUP Consultants Pvt. Ltd Fax (91) (033) 2280 7531
E-mail kolkata@stupmail.com

OFFICE OF ORIGIN
KOLKATA

OWNER

NAGPUR METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED

CONTRACTOR CLIENT

ITD CEMENTATION INDIA LIMITED

PROJECT
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED VIADUCT OF LENGTH
6.398 KMS FROM CH: 591 TO CH: 5691.7, CH: 6314.9 TO CH:
7100 AND CH: 7187 TO CH: 7700 BETWEEN PRAJAPATI NAGAR
TO SITABURDI

TITLE
DESIGN OF TEST PILE TP-2 FOR INITIAL VERTICAL & INITIAL LATERAL
PILE LOAD TEST

DATE REV. MODIFICATION / PURPOSE OF PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED

NO. ISSUE SHEET NOS /
ANNEXURES INITIALS SIGNATURE INITIALS SIGNATURE INITIALS SIGNATURE

11.5.2017 R0 FOR APPROVAL RJN RKD AKC

DATE NOTE NO.

SHEETS
11.5.2017 11568/DD/DN-02
Associate Executive Director

This note is the property of STUP Consultants Pvt. Ltd. It should not be used, copied or reproduced
without their written permission
INTRODUCTION

This design note covers the geotechnical and structural design of test pile (TP-2) to be tested for
initial vertical load test & initial lateral load test near P143 Location Between Seva Sadan
Chowk & Gitanjali Chowk in Nagpur. The location of test pile is mentioned in the drawing. The
reference Bore Hole for design of test pile TP-2 has been taken as BH-P-120. The geotechnical
parameters have been taken from the soil report which has been attached with this design note.

A preliminary design of pile has been carried out for a pier near the test pile location. The
maximum vertical and horizontal load coming on a single pile comes out to be 637t & 24t .
However, for load testing, we have taken the working test load as 725t for initial vertical load
test and 30t for initial lateral load test. The design of pile has been attached as Annexure-A.
 Date: 11-05-17 Note No. 11568/DD/DN-02

By: RJN Sheet No.

depth (m) OGL Soil Propoerty :

0.00 1.00 m CR RQD qc Nav C
Layer 1

Filled Up Soil % % MPa Value MPa Value

4.00 Pile Top Layer 1 N.A N.A N.A 14 N.A N.A
Layer 2 N.A N.A N.A 95 N.A N.A
Layer 2

Silty Clay Layer 3 N.A N.A N.A 150 N.A N.A

5.00 Layer 4 24 N.A N.A 150 N.A N.A
Layer 5 N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A
Layer 6 N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A
8.00 m
Layer 3

Decomposed Rock Starts at 5 m from OGL

products of rock Pile Tip 4.00 m from Pile Top

11
Layer 4

Weathered Rock
15.1
Layer 5
Layer 6

Dia of Pile 1200 mm Grade of Concrete M 35

Load Carrying Capacity of Pile in Rock

Method 1 : Rock is hard rock or RQD is there.

Method 2 : Weak Rock, RQD = 0 or (CR+RQD)/2 or strata not classified as a granular or clayey soil or when crushing
strength <10 MPa
 Date: 11-05-17 Note No. 11568/DD/DN-02

By: RJN Sheet No.

Method 2 : Ultimate capacity of piles socketed into Rock, Qu (in Newton)

Qu = Re + Raf = Cub.Nc.Ab + As.Cus

Allowable Capacity of Pile, Qallow = (Re/3) + (Raf/6)

Re = Ultimate End Bearing

Raf = Ultimate side socket shear

Cub = Average shear strength below base of pile (for the depth of 2*dia of pile), based on N value

Approx N value (From pile tip to 2*dia of pile depth) = 150

Cub = 1.3 MPa

Nc = 9

Ab = Cross-sectional area of pile at base = / 4 * 1200^2

2
= 1130973.4 mm
Here, Length of Socket = 4.00 m
So for friction capacity effective socket length = 4 - 0.3 m = 3.70 m
2
As = Surface area of Socket = pi()*1200*3700 = 13948671.4 mm

Cus = Ultimate shear strength of rock along socket length

= maximum 3.0 MPa for M35 grade of concrete

Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 Layer 4 Layer 5 Layer 6

N Value 14 95 150 0 0 0
Cus (in MPa) = 0 0 1.3 0 0 0
Socket Length (m) 0 0 3.7 0 0 0
Surface area of socket = As (mm2) 0 0 1E+07 0 0.0E+00 0.0E+00
Raf = As.Cus = 0 0 2E+07 0 0.0E+00 0.0E+00
Total Raf = 18133272.8 N = 1813.3 ton

Re = Cub.Nc.Ab = 1.3 * 9 * 1130973.4 = 13232388.8 N = 1323.2 ton

Maximum allowable end bearing after dividing by factor of safety (=3) = 5 MPa
Hence, Maximum Re = 5 * 1130973.4 * 3 = 16964601.0 N = 1696.5 ton

So, Design value of Re = Minimum of ( 1323.2 , 1696.5 ) ton = 1323.2 ton

Raf = As.Cus 1813.3 ton

Allowable Capacity of Pile, Qallow = (Re/3)+(Raf/6) = 1323.2 / 3 + 1813.3 / 6 = 743.283 ton
For Design purpose consider 725 ton
 Date: 11-05-2017 Note No. 11568/DD/DN-02

STUP Consultants P. Ltd. By: RJN

Design Vertical Load = 725.0 ton (for 8.0 m Pile Length)

Test Load (Factor = 2.5) = 1812.50 ton
ULS Load on Pile = 1.5 * 1812.5 = 2718.75 ton
Diameter of the Test Pile 1200.0 mm

Grade of Concrete of Pile = M35

So, compression capacity of the Pile = 0.4 fck Ac
= 0.4 * 35 * /4 * 1.2^2
= 1583.36 ton
< 2718.75 ton
Hence, extra reinforcement to be provided to resist the extra load.

Since during Vertical Load test no Bending Moment is there, therefore pile has been considered as a column
and as per Cl. 15.6.3.2 (Equation 14) of CBC, the maximum permissible load of the Pile in compression = 0.4 fck .A
+ fyc.Asc
Where, fck = characteristic strength of concrete = 35.0 N/mm2
2
Ac = Area of the Pile = /4 *1200^2 = 1130973.4 mm
fyc = Design compressive strength of the reinforcement = fy / (Ym+fy/2000)
2
For Fe 500 grade of reinforcement, fy = 500 N/mm
Ym = 1.15
Therefore, fyc = 500 / (1.15+500/2000) = 357.143 N/mm2

Provided Reinfircement = 32mm diameter 42 Nos.

42 * /4 *32^2 = 33778.40 mm2

So, compression capacity of the Pile = 0.4 fck.Ac + fyc.Asc

= 0.4 * 35 * /4 * 1.2^2
= 27897343.39 N
= 2789.73 ton
> 2718.75 ton
Hence, Provided Reinforcement is Safe

Mimimum Steel required = 0.4 % (as per Cl. 6.11.1 of IS 2911 Part I, Sec-II )

Ast = 33778.40 mm2

= 33778.4 / 1130973.4 * 100%
= 2.99 % of Pile Cross sectional Area
Hence Safe

32 mm Diameter Bars of 42 No.s has to be provided.

 Date: 11-05-2017 Note No. 11568/DD/DN-02
STUP Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
By: RJN Sheet No.
Lateral Test Pile
This design note consists of lateral load test for pile. For testing factored design lateral load to
be applied at pile top and deflection at pile top and pile cut-off level to be measured. From this
data the deflection of pile at design scour level to be calculated.

Here, Scour depth = 0

3
Here, the pile is free head pile. Therefore, the deflection at pile = PL /3EI

As per IS : 2911 Part 4, Clause 7.4, Horizontal Capacity of the pile will be minimum of
a) 50% of Lateral Load for 12mm deflection at scour level &
b) Lateral Load for 5mm deflection at the same level.

' (to measure at site) Test Load RL 0 m

L1 = 1.00 m
1.00 m
Pile cut-off level Pile Cut-off Level
' (to be calculate) RL -1.000 m
Depth of fixity
5.10 m 5.10 m

As per Design Report, Horizontal Load Capacity of Pile = 30.0 ton

Applying 2.5 times Load Factor on desig load for Lateral Load Test = 30.0*2.5 = 75.0 ton

ULS Check for Free Head Pile :

Grade of concrete M 35 Grade of steel Fe 500
2 4
Econcrete = 5000 fck0.5 = 29580399 kN/m I of pile = 0.102 m
Consider L1 = 1m So, from Soil report

Soil Data Depth of Soil Layer Average N Value of nk Stiffness Factor

N Value
From (m) To (m) Value MN/m3 T = (EI/nk)^1/5, in m
1 1.3 7
2 3 10
34.29 7.3585 3.329
3 4 24
4 5.1 95

T = 332.9181 cm L1/T = 0.300

From fig. 2 of appendix C of IS:2911(P1/Sec 2)
Lf/T or Lf/R = 2.1 Lf = 6.991 m m (fig. 5A) = 0.4
However, here rock starts at level 5.1 m from top, thus, Lf = 5.100 m

Moment considered = 75.0*1.5*0.4*(1+5.100 m)*10 = 2745.00 kN-m

Minimum vertical force (pile self weight) = 172.47 kN
3
Mu/fckD = (2745.00*10^6)/(35*1200^3) = 0.045
Pu/fckD2 = 172.47*1000/(35*1200^2) = 0.003
P/fck (from chart 59 of SP-16) = 0.025
Ast Required = 9891 mm2
Provide 32 mm dia 21 no.s in 1st Layer
32 mm dia 21 no.s in 2nd Layer
Minimum percentage of steel required = 0.4 %
Percentage of steel required = 0.875 %
Percentage of steel Provided = 2.99 % OK
ANNEXURE -A
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) Ltd. RJN
Prepared By: Date:- May 11, 2017
DesignFor Pier Near TP-2
R-2 IO/1
GIVE YOUR INPUT ONLY IN CELL For DOUBLE TRACKS Stucture
Face Sheet For INPUT DATA
As taken Default
Item Description Unit Give Input
for Design Value T.O.R
LEVEL :- 321.10 m
Top of Rail Level (TOR) m 321.103 - 321.103
Ground Level m 306.822 - 306.82
Pilecap below GL mm 500 - 500 Left Span Right Span
Ht. of Bearing mm 100 100
Ht. Of Rail Sleeper / Plinth mm 482 572 482 Pier Cap
SPAN ARRANGEMENT:-
Radius of Curvature m 5000 - 5000
Left : Overall Span Length m 34 - 34 Hn
Right : Overall Span Length m 34 - 34 11.90 H(Max),m
Pier
Left : Effective Span m 32.30 - 32.30 Section -n-n
Right : Effective Span m 32.30 - 32.30
Depth of Superstructure :Left mm 2000 - 2000
Depth of Superstructure :Right mm 2000 - 2000
Transverse Eccentricity :Left Span mm 0 0
Transverse Eccentricity :Right Span mm 0 0 306.822
CG of Superstructure from Top :Left m 0.826 - 0.826 GL (m)
CG of Superstructure from Top :Right m 0.826 - 0.826 500 mm section-1-1
GEOMETRY:-
PierCap (See Fig.-2) L in m B in m height(m) pilecap
Eccentricity for
Surface-1& 2 Surface-1 3.8 2.8
1.3 Cantilever Pier w.r.t
L Surface-2 2.8 2.8 piles
Pier C.L (m) ?
B For Surface-3
Length of rectangular portion = 1.95
Surface-3 Width of rectangular portion = 1.95 Figure-1
Diameter of circular portion = 0.0001 Surface 1
0.0001 Height between Surface 2 and 3= 0.5 Pier Cap Surface 2
Pier Cap ecc. (Trans) w.r.t. Pier
1.95 Unit Des.Value Default Ur. Input Surface 3
Pier (See Figure-3) m 0 0 Figure-2 For Piercap
For the purpose of curtailment design and taking care of variable pier section with height; there is a facility to divide the pier
into 6 sections (equal spacing) if necessary. See the input table at I-54 for unequal spacing of sections.
Number of Pier Section 3 (max 6 no.) Pier has been assumed as a
Uniform spacing of sec. 2 m generalized section with 2 parts; one Orientation of Pier = Longitudinal
Total Height of the is central rectangular section and the
10.099 other is two half circles
Pier Stem (m) = Trans
Ht. (Hn) Level at the Pier Dimension
Section No.
section (m) section a b d
0 0 N.A d b
1.95 1.95 0.0001 Long
0 0 N.A 1.95 1.95 0.0001
0 0 N.A 1.95 1.95 0.0001 a
d/2
3 6.099 310.322 1.95 1.95 0.0001
2 8.099 308.322 1.95 1.95 0.0001 Figure-3 For Pier
1 10.099 306.322 1.95 1.95 0.0001

SPAN Pier with unequal spacing of sections

Description Unit
Left Right Section No. Ht.(Hn) in m
Bearing No of Pedestal No. 2 2 6
Pedestal Height mm 300 300 5
Width mm 800 800 4
Length mm 800 800 3
Height mm 950 2
Shear
Width mm 1000 1 10.099
Block
Length mm 1150
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) RJN
Prepared By: Date:- 11-May-17
DesignFor Pier Near TP-2
R-2 IO/2
As taken Default
Sl. No Description Unit Give Input
for Design Value Max Bar . Reinf. %
Material for Pier and Pier Cap Dia. mm Min % Max %
Grade of Concrete fck N/mm^2 40 50 40 32 0.8 4
Grade of Reinforcement N/mm^2 500 500 modular Ration, m= 8.75
E conc. (as per 7.1.2 of DBR) N/mm^2 29500 29500
Material for Pile and Pile Cap Max Bar . Reinf. %
Grade of Concrete fck N/mm^2 35 35 Dia. mm Min % Max %
Grade of Reinforcement N/mm^2 500 500 20 0.4 2.5
modular Ration, m= 10.00
Density of Reinforced Concrete T/m^3 2.5 2.5
Dead Load (Refer to Clause 8.1 of DBR) For launching load, it is considered that
Left Span :- Dead Load T 263.50 264 left span is already errected and right
Right Span :- Dead Load T 263.50 264 span is in erection condition.
Left Span :- SIDL T 127.50 127.5 Explanatory Note On Braking and
Right Span :- SIDL T 127.50 127.5 Tractive Forces
Launching Load T 530.25 530 1. If span is less than 22m or more than 37m, indicate
Live Load Train Axel Load= T 16 17 16 no. of axel on the span for respective loading for the
purpose of calculation of tractive and braking forces
For Max Pier Load : Both Span Loaded (with Single Lane / Track Loaded)
Left Span :- Live Load T 59.10 59.10 axel for span of length 34
Right Span :- Live Load T 44.53 44.53 axel for span of length 34
Dynamic Impact=0.15+8/(6+L) 1.35 1.35
For Max Long. Moment: Single Span Loaded (with Single Lane / Track Loaded) 2. The distribution of longitudinal forces to
Left Span :- Live Load T 59.10 59.10 pier depends on the type of bearing. In case
Right Span :- Live Load T 59.10 59.10 of neoprene bearing when no extra
(above reaction is for one span loaded only) restrainer like seismic block are provided, all
Maximum Transverse Ecc. Of Live Load mm 2050 - 2050 the horizontal forces are taken by the
Maximum Speed at Curvature Km/Hr. 80 80 neoprene bearing by equal distribution i.e.
Seismic Coefficient (Refer to clause 8.11 of DBR) 50% of the force will come to the pier under
Seismic Zone II - II consideration and balance 50% will go to
Zone Factor Z 0.1 - 0.1 other end of the girder. If
Importance Factor :I 1.5 - 1.5 Seismic restrainer / shear block is
Seismic Reduction Factor 4 - 4 introduced to fix one end of the girder then
Time Period Sec 0.907 0.907 all the forces (100%) of that span will be
Sa/g 2.500 1.841 2.5 transferred to the pier under consideration.
Type of Soil (Hard / Medium/ Soft) Soft Soft Soft Other end neoprene bearing will not take any
Longitudinal (Non Seismic) Forces (Refer to Clause 8.7 of DBR) load. As per
Also See Explanatory Note on Braking and Tractive Forces IRS Bridge rule these forces may be
Tractive Force as % of Vertical LL % 20.00% 20% dispersed to adjacent span; the forces as
Braking Force as % of Vertical LL % 18.00% 18% calculated in page-3 includes such
Dispersion percentage % 0.00% 25% 0% dispersion on the basis of percentage
(reference clause 2.8.3 of IRS indicated in the input data.
Therefore it is important to define such
Long Welded Rail Load (Refer to Clause 8.5.2 of DBR) condition as given below
LWR Load for both the track T/m 1.0500 0.5200 1.05

Derailment Load (Refer to Clause 8.13 of DBR)

(Loads are calculated as per Bridge Rule) Horizontal Long. Force is resisted by
Maximum Transverse Ecc. m 4.1 - 4.1 By Shear Block only 1
(Ignored for Substructure & Fdn. Design. It is used for local check of superstructure) By Neoprene Bearing only 0
Input 1 for Yes, 0 for No
Application of the centrifugal force above mm 1830 - 1830
rail level [as per IRS Bridge Rule, For other type of bearing, forces can be
1830mm for BG and 1450mm for MG]
directly given into the table in Page-3
CRASH BARRIER ABOVE PILE CAP Default Input Default Input
Weight of Crash Barrier (T) 23.57 11.45 CG level of Crash Barrier 0.70 0.701
Weight of Crash Barrier above GL(T) 14.92 6.95 CG level of Crash Barrier (for the part above GL) 0.99 0.993
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) Ltd. RJN
Prepared By: Date:- May 11, 2017
DesignFor Pier Near TP-2
R-2 IO/3
Foundation Details (This is based on standard pile group from 3 piles to 6 piles, beyond that it is special group then give special pile :y)
Length of Pile From Cutoff Level m 8 8 Special group (y / n)? n
Diameter of Pile m 1.2 1.2
No. of Piles in group Nos. 4 4
Spacing of pile m 3.6 3.6 Intend to use Specific Pile arrangement ?
Depth of Pile Cap m 1.8 1.8 1.8 ( Give value 1 for yes and 0 for No)
Orientation of Pile Cap, Long Long Number of Piles (Max 16)=
Input should be either "Long" or "Trans" for 3 or 6 pile Orientation of Pile Group=
group; Also refer to worksheet for pilegroup
C.L of
Eccentricity Of Pile Group with respect to Pier Centre (including pile shift of 75mm as per IRC code) Pile Group
Along X / Longitudinal Direction m 0.053 0.053
Along Y / Transverse Direction m 0.053 0.053
Clear Edge Distance from Pile mm 150 0 150
Safe Load Carrying Capacity of Pile :-
Vertical Safe Load (T) Safe Tension (T) Horizontal Load (T) Pile Cap
725 40 30
% increase for Seismic / wind 25.00%
In case of special pile, give detail input in spreadsheet "Pile Group"
QUICK CHECK OF OUTPUT

Output For Pile Foundation:-

Actual Load On Pile
Max Vertical Load (T) Min Load/Tension (T)## Horizontal Load (T)
637 69 24
OK OK OK
##Note: +ve indicates min downward load, -
ve indicates tension
Load Case:-
Maximum Vertical Load LWR Case : Both Span and Both Track Loaded
Minimum Load, or Max Tension LWR Case : Single Span and Both Track Loaded
Maximum Horizontal Load LWR Case : Both Span and Both Track Loaded
Maximum Moment Normal Case : Both Span and Both Track Loaded

Reinforcement Details:-
Reinf. For Pier
Reqd. Provide
Section
Ast. Mm2 Dia, mm Total No. Layer Spac,mm Ast. mm2 pt %
Sec-1 30420 32 39 2 335 31366 0.8249%
Sec-2 0 #N/A #N/A 2 #N/A #N/A #N/A
Sec-3 0 #N/A #N/A 1 #N/A #N/A #N/A
Sec-4 FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE
Sec-5 FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE
Sec-6 FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

Reinf. For Piles

Description Unit
Required Area of Steel mm^2 8482
Min. no. of Bars to maintain max allow. Spacing nos. 12
No. layers nos. 1 Remarks on Longituinal Reinf.
Diameter of Bars mm 20 #N/A
No. of Bars Nos. 28 Helical Reinf. As Lateral Tie
Area of Reinforcement mm^2 8796 (Refer Clause 26.5.3 (d) of IS 456 :2000)
Spacing mm 113 Diameter in mm 10 10
pt (%) Nos. 0.78% Pitch in mm 200 200
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) Ltd. RJN
Designed By Date:- 11-May-17
DesignFor P110 R-2 Load-P1

LIVE LOAD CALCULATION: One Span Loaded ( Left Span )

Direction of Traffic
Y
Overall Span 34 m X 1.026316
(0,0) First Axel
Centre to Centre 32.3 m
Cantilever Projection 0.85 m -0.02632 32.3 0.85
0.85 R(Left-1) R(Left)-2
Overall Length of a Car = 21.8 Influence Line Diagram for R(Left-2)

2.45m Second Car First Car

2.2175m
2.2175m 11.065m 2.45m 2.2175m 2.45m 11.065m 2.45m

Axel mkd. Car-2/P4 Car-2/P3 Car-2/P2 Car-2/P1 Car-1/P4 Car-1/P3 Car-1/P2 Car-1/P1
Axel Load(T) 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Spacing(m) ** 2.2 12.5 2.2 4.9 2.2 12.5 2.2 0
** It is distance from adjacent front axel.
C.L of Pier Under Consideration
Position of First Axel 34 m

Axel Mkd X Ordinate Reaction Left Span Right Span

Car-1/P1 34 1.0263 16.421 34 34
Car-1/P2 31.8 0.9582 15.331 R(Left-1) R(Left-2) R(right-1) R(Right-2)
Car-1/P3 19.3 0.5712 9.139
Car-1/P4 17.1 0.5031 8.050 Only Left Span Loaded
Car-2/P1 12.2 0.3514 5.622
Car-2/P2 10 0.2833 4.533
Car-2/P3 -2.5 0.0000 0.000
Car-2/P4 -4.7 0.0000 0.000
Car-3/P1 -9.6 0.0000 0.000
Car-3/P2 -11.8 0.0000 0.000
Car-3/P3 -24.3 0.0000 0.000
Car-3/P4 -26.5 0.0000 0.000
Car-4/P1 -31.4 0.0000 0.000
Car-4/P2 -33.6 0.0000 0.000
Car-4/P3 -46.1 0.0000 0.000
Car-4/P4 -48.3 0.0000 0.000
Car-5/P1 -53.2 0.0000 0.000
Car-5/P2 -55.4 0.0000 0.000
Car-5/P3 -67.9 0.0000 0.000
Car-5/P4 -70.1 0.0000 0.000
Maximum Reaction=R(left-2)= 59.096
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) RJN
Designed By Date:- 11-May-17
DesignFor Pier Near TP-2 R-2 Load-P2

LIVE LOAD CALCULATION: One Span Loaded ( Right Span )

Direction of Traffic
Y
Overall Span 34 m 1.026316 First Axel X (0,0)
Centre to Centre 32.3 m
Cantilever Projection 0.85 m 32.3 0.85 -0.02632
0.85 R(Right-1) R(Right)-2
Influence Line Diagram for R(Right-1)

2.45m 2.217
2.2175m 11.065m 2.45m 2.2175m
5m 2.45m 11.065m 2.45m 2.2175m
Axel mkd. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Axel Load(T) 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Spacing(m) 0 2.2 12.5 2.2 4.9 2.2 12.5 2.2
C.L of Pier Under Consideration
Position of First Axel 34 m
Only Right Span Loaded
Axel Mkd X Ordinate Reaction Left Span Right Span
Car-1/P1 34 1.0263 16.421 34 34
Car-1/P2 31.8 0.9582 15.331 R(Left-1) R(Left-2) R(right-1) R(Right-2)
Car-1/P3 19.3 0.5712 9.139
Car-1/P4 17.1 0.5031 8.050 Only Right Span Loaded
Car-2/P1 12.2 0.3514 5.622
Car-2/P2 10 0.2833 4.533
Car-2/P3 -2.5 0.0000 0.000
Car-2/P4 -4.7 0.0000 0.000
Car-3/P1 -9.6 0.0000 0.000
Car-3/P2 -11.8 0.0000 0.000
Car-3/P3 -24.3 0.0000 0.000
Car-3/P4 -26.5 0.0000 0.000
Car-4/P1 -31.4 0.0000 0.000
Car-4/P2 -33.6 0.0000 0.000
Car-4/P3 -46.1 0.0000 0.000
Car-4/P4 -48.3 0.0000 0.000
Car-5/P1 -53.2 0.0000 0.000
Car-5/P2 -55.4 0.0000 0.000
Car-5/P3 -67.9 0.0000 0.000
Car-5/P4 -70.1 0.0000 0.000
Maximum Reaction=R(Right-1)= 59.096
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) RJN
Designed By Date:- 11-May-17
DesignFor Pier Near TP-2 R-2 Load-P3

LIVE LOAD CALCULATION: Both Spans Loaded

Y
X 1.026316 1.026316
(0,0)
-0.02632 Left Span Right Span -0.02632
34 R(Left-2) R(Right-1) 34
Combined Influence Line Diagram For R(Left-2) & R(Right-1)

2.45m Second Car First Car

2.2175m
2.2175m 11.065m 2.45m 2.2175m 2.45m 11.065m 2.45m

Axel mkd. Car-2/P4 Car-2/P3 Car-2/P2 Car-2/P1 Car-1/P4 Car-1/P3 Car-1/P2 Car-1/P1
Axel Load(T) 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Spacing(m) ** 2.2 12.5 2.2 4.9 2.2 12.5 2.2 0
** It is distance from adjacent front axel.
Position of First Axel of 1st Car = 77.6 m

Origin of the co-ordinate is at the starting of L. Span Origin of the co-ordinate is at the starting of R. Span
Sl.No Axel Mkd X Ordinate Reaction Sl.No Axel Mkd X Ordinate Reaction
1 Car-1/P1 34 1.0263 16.421 1 Car-1/P1 77.6 0.0000 0.000
2 Car-1/P2 31.8 0.9582 15.331 2 Car-1/P2 75.4 0.0000 0.000
3 Car-1/P3 19.3 0.5712 9.139 3 Car-1/P3 62.9 0.1316 2.105
4 Car-1/P4 17.1 0.5031 8.050 4 Car-1/P4 60.7 0.1997 3.195
5 Car-2/P1 12.2 0.3514 5.622 5 Car-2/P1 55.8 0.3514 5.622
6 Car-2/P2 10 0.2833 4.533 6 Car-2/P2 53.6 0.4195 6.712
7 Car-2/P3 -2.5 0.0000 0.000 7 Car-2/P3 41.1 0.8065 12.904
8 Car-2/P4 -4.7 0.0000 0.000 8 Car-2/P4 38.9 0.8746 13.994
9 Car-3/P1 -9.6 0.0000 0.000 9 Car-3/P1 34 0.0000 0.000
10 Car-3/P2 -11.8 0.0000 0.000 10 Car-3/P2 31.8 0.0000 0.000
11 Car-3/P3 -24.3 0.0000 0.000 11 Car-3/P3 19.3 0.0000 0.000
12 Car-3/P4 -26.5 0.0000 0.000 12 Car-3/P4 17.1 0.0000 0.000
13 Car-4/P1 -31.4 0.0000 0.000 13 Car-4/P1 12.2 0.0000 0.000
14 Car-4/P2 -33.6 0.0000 0.000 14 Car-4/P2 10 0.0000 0.000
15 Car-4/P3 -46.1 0.0000 0.000 15 Car-4/P3 -2.5 0.0000 0.000
16 Car-4/P4 -48.3 0.0000 0.000 16 Car-4/P4 -4.7 0.0000 0.000
17 Car-5/P1 -53.2 0.0000 0.000 17 Car-5/P1 -9.6 0.0000 0.000
18 Car-5/P2 -55.4 0.0000 0.000 18 Car-5/P2 -11.8 0.0000 0.000
19 Car-5/P3 -67.9 0.0000 0.000 19 Car-5/P3 -24.3 0.0000 0.000
20 Car-5/P4 -70.1 0.0000 0.000 20 Car-5/P4 -26.5 0.0000 0.000
Max Support Reaction From Left Span 59.096 Max Support Reaction From Right Span 44.533
Maximum Pier Reaction(T)
103.628
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) Prepared By:
RJN Date:- 11-May-17
Location:- Pier Near TP-2 R-2 1
Your INPUT has been tagged by CELL

T.O.R
321.10
Levels Material For Pier and Pier Cap
Top of Rail Level 321.103 m Grade of Concrete M 40 Density
Top of Pier Cap Level 318.221 m Grade of Steel Fe 500 2.5
Ground Level 306.822 m Level related Dimensions
Top of Pile Cap Level 306.322 m Ht. Of Rail Sleeper / Plinth 482 mm
Pier Cap Geometry Height of Bearing in mm 100 mm
Surface 1 Bearing Pedestal Height (Min) 300 mm
Surface 2 0.617172 Top of Bearing Level 318.621 m Hn
0.221101 Transverse ecc. Of Pier Cap 0 mm
Surface 3 Depth (Max) of superstructure 2000 mm Section -n-n
Ht. Of Pier Cap 1800 mm
Surface-1& 2 Foundation/ Pilecap below GL 500 mm
L L in m B in m height(m) A in m^2 Vol m^3
B Surface-1 3.8 2.8 10.64
1.3 11.97
Surface-2 2.8 2.8 7.84 GL
Surface-3 in m A in m^2 Vol m^3 Section -1-1
Length of rectangular portion = 1.95
1.95 Width of rectangular portion = 1.95
3.80 2.85
Diameter of circular portion = 0.0001
1.95 Height between Surface 2 and 3= 0.5
Total Volume of Pier Cap in m^3 14.82
C.G of the Pier Cap from Surface 1 = 0.791 m Weight of Pier Cap(T)
Level of the Pier Cap C.G. = 317.43 m 37.04
PIER GEOMETRY
d b
Number of Pier Section 3 (max 6 no.) Assumed generalized section of pier is two
Sectional Height 2 m half circles with central rectangular body
Total Height of the Perimeter a
10.099 7.80 d/2
Pier Stem (m) = of Pier Pier Section
Level at the Pier Dimension Area Pier V(m^3) SegmentCG Pier CG(m) CG Lv. of the Pier Wt(T)
Section No. Ht. (Hn)wrt
section (m) section a b d (m^2) above sec frm.section frm.section Pier Part above sec

0 0 N.A 1.95 1.95 0.0001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #VALUE! 0.00
0 0 N.A 1.95 1.95 0.0001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #VALUE! 0.00
0 0 N.A 1.95 1.95 0.0001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #VALUE! 0.00
3 6.099 310.322 1.95 1.95 0.0001 3.80 23.19 3.05 3.05 313.37 57.98
2 8.099 308.322 1.95 1.95 0.0001 3.80 30.80 1.00 4.05 312.37 76.99
1 10.099 306.322 1.95 1.95 0.0001 3.80 38.40 1.00 5.05 311.37 96.00
PEDESTALS CG of Superstructure
SPAN SPAN
Description Unit
Left Right Left(m) Right(m)
No of Pedestal No. 2 2 CG from Top of Str. 0.826 0.826
Height mm 300 300 Dead Load 263.5 263.5
Width mm 800 800 Combined CG fr. topdeck 0.826
Bearing Pedestal Length mm 800 800 Level of combined CG 319.795
Total volume of Pedestal m^3 0.384 0.384 Remarks (if any):-
Weight of Pedestal T 0.96 0.96
Total Wt. T 1.92
Height mm 950
Width mm 1000
Shear Block (1 no.) Length mm 1150
Volume of Pedestal m^3 1.0925 CombinedCG of Pedestal from top of pier cap
Weight of Pedestal T 2.73125 Height in m 0.34
Total Weight of Bearing Pedestals and Shear Block T 4.65125 Level in m 318.56
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) Ltd. RJN
Designed By Date:- 11-May-17
DesignFor Pier Near TP-2 R-2 2
Your INPUT has been tagged by CELL
Left Span Right Span
SPAN
Description Unit
Left Right T.O.R
Overall Span Length m 34 34
Centre to Centre of Bearings m 32.30 32.30
Dead load from Superstructure DL T 264 264 EL-L EL-R
Superimposed Dead Load SIDL T 128 128
Longitudinal eccentricity (+ve for Clockwise)EL-L, EL-R mm -850 850
Transverse eccentricity ET-L, ET-R mm 0 0
Depth of superstructure mm 2000 2000
DL & SIDL :Service Condition Hn
Total Dead Load T 527
Total Longitudinal Moment due to Dead Load T-m 0 Section -n-n
Total Transverse Moment due to Dead Load T-m 0
Total Superimposed Dead Load (SIDL) T 255
Total Longitudinal Moment due toSIDL T-m 0
Total Transverse Moment due to SIDL T-m 0
DL & SIDL :Launching Condition GL
Total Dead Load T 794 Section -1-1
Total Longitudinal Moment due to Dead Load T-m 675
Total Transverse Moment due to Dead Load T-m 0
Total Superimposed Dead Load (SIDL) T 0
Total Longitudinal Moment due toSIDL T-m 0
Total Transverse Moment due to SIDL T-m 0
Live Load (LL) + (Including FPLL)
Live Load For Max Pier Reaction (Single Lane/Track Loaded) T 79.78 60.12
Live Load For Max Moment(ML)(Single Track Loaded) T 79.78 79.78 2050 2050
Maximum Tranverse Eccentric Position of LL mm 2050 Deck
LL : Service Condition - Both Span Loaded + Both Lane / Track Loaded
Total Live Load T 279.80 Pier
Total Longitudinal Moment due to Live Load T-m 33.42
Total Transverse Moment due to Live Load T-m 3.42
LL : Service Condition - Both Span Loaded + Single Lane / Track Loaded
Total Live Load T 139.90
Total Longitudinal Moment due to Live Load T-m 16.71
Total Transverse Moment due to Live Load T-m 288.50
LL : Service Condition - Single Span Loaded + Both Lane / Track Loaded
CL of Superstar
Total Live Load T 159.56
Total Longitudinal Moment due to Live Load T-m 135.63
Total Transverse Moment due to Live Load T-m 1.71
LL : Service Condition - Single Span Loaded + Single Lane / Track Loaded
Total Live Load T 79.78
Total Longitudinal Moment due to Live Load T-m 67.81
Total Transverse Moment due to Live Load T-m 164.40
Remarks (if any):- 1. To get double track load, single track loads are simply multipiled by 2 for avoiding another logical step to the spread sheet. 2.
2. Transverse moment includes moment due to eccentricity for curvature for LL.
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) Ltd. RJN
Prepared By: Date:- 11-May-17
DesignFor Pier Near TP-2 R-2 3
Horizontal Forces (Non Seismic)
Longitudinal Force:- (This is Tractive ? Braking Force ) Horizontal Long. Force is resisted by
Percentage of Force Reference Longitudinal force depends on the loaded span, as explained in the clause 2.8.2 of IRS: By Shear Block 1
Bridge Rule, corrigendum slip no.30 dated 26-09-02. The percentage has been taken from
Tractive = 20.00% By Neoprene only 0
the NIT provision.
Braking = 18.00%
Dispersion percentage (reference clause 2.8.3 of IRS Bridge Rule ) 0.00% Input 1 for Yes, 0 for No
Span in m 22 25 28 31 34 37
Max no. of axles 5 6 8 9 9 9 SEE EXPLANATORY NOTE ON DISTRIBUTION
Braking Load (T) 14.4 17.28 23.04 25.92 25.92 25.92 OF BRAKING & TRACTIVE FORCES
Tractive Load (T) 16 19.2 25.6 28.8 28.8 28.8
LL : Service Condition - Both Span Loaded + Both Lane / Track Loaded
Span Left Right Design Longitudinal force on Pier
Braking Force (T) 25.92 25.92 54.72
Tractive Force (T) 28.8 28.8
LL : Service Condition - Both Span Loaded + Single Lane / Track Loaded
Span Left Right Design Longitudinal force on Pier
Braking Force (T) 25.92 25.92 28.80 Both the Spans Loaded
Tractive Force (T) 28.8 28.8
LL : Service Condition - Single Span Loaded + Both Lane / Track Loaded
Span Left Right Design Longitudinal force on Pier
Braking Force (T) 25.92 25.92 54.72
Tractive Force (T) 28.8 28.8
LL : Service Condition - Single Span Loaded + Single Lane / Track Loaded
Span Left Right Design Longitudinal force on Pier Single Span Loaded
Braking Force (T) 25.92 25.92 28.8
Tractive Force (T) 28.8 28.8

LONG WELDED RAIL FORCE (TEMP LOAD) DERAILMENT LOAD (Refer Clause 8.13 of DBR)
As per Cl. No. 8.5.2 of DBR Reference :- APPENDIX-IX of IRS Bridge Rule
LWR force for both the track 1.05 T/m The derailment load for max axel load 25T = 9.4 T/m
LWR force on pier (Hl\L-long.) 35.7 Trans(HT)- 0.24 The derailment load for design axel load = 6.016 T/m
The length of the derailment line load / span to be considered as per IRS Bridge rule = 20 m Total Load per span
This load is acting on the edge of the structure I.e. eccentricity w.r.t centre line superstr 4.1 m 120.32 T
The effective eccentricit with respect to centre line of the pier (including eccentric Deck)= 4.1 m
Horizontal Force40% of One Coach Weight(T) = 25.6 acting at Rail Level (m) 321.103 OneSpan Loaded Both Span Loaded
Trans. M (T-m) due to ecc. (Same for Single / both) 6.016 x20 x 4.1 = 493.31 493.31
FORCES DUE TO CURVATURE AND ECCENTRICITY OF TRACK (Refer Clause 8.4 of DBR)
The Centrifugal Force is calculated on the basis of Clause 2.5 of IRS Bridge Rule. As the rails are fixed directly on RCC plinth, the eccentricity of rail track is
ignored. EUDL (W) has been calculated from the table given in Appendix-II for MBG, which is for 25 T axel Load. This is an conservative approach. As an
alternative, Reactions based calculations are detailed below in page 4A; which is more appropriate especially for multi tracks.
R= radius of Curvature (keep blank if curvature=0) 5000 m Calculation of EUDL (W) Left Span Right Span
V=Maximum speed (as per Tender Document) 80 Km/Hr EUDL for shear force (for MBG)= 9.97 9.97
W = Equivalent distributed live load = T/m Converted EUDL for MRT (T/m) 6.38 6.38
C = Horizontal effect in T/m = (W x V 2)/127R = T/m Horizontal effect C in T/m 0.06 0.06
Application of the centrifugal force above rail level [as mm Total Centrifugal Force (T) 2.19
1830
per IRS Bridge Rule, 1830mm for BG and 1450mm for MG] Acting at Level (m) 322.933
RACKING FORCE (Refer Clause 8.8 of DBR)
Horizontal Force due to racking in Transverse Direction =4.0 kN/m= 0.4 T/m, Per Track
Racking Force at Pier:-
1, For Both Span Both Track Loaded = 27.2 T,acting at 321.103 m
2, For Both Span Single Track Loaded = 13.6 T,acting at 321.103 m
1, For Single Span Both Track Loaded = 13.6 T,acting at 321.103 m
1, For Single Span Single Track Loaded = 6.8 T,acting at 321.103 m
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) Designed ByRJN Date:- 11-May-17
Location:- Pier Near TP-2 R-2 4
SEISMIC FORCES (As Per Cl.8.11 of DBR)
As Per IS: 1893 (Part 1) :2002, (Refer IRC-6-2000) Pier Stiffness = K=3EI/L^3 L= Ht. of Pier in m = 11.899
Seismic Zone II Equivalent Dia.In m = 2.2003394 I gross = 1.150611 m^4
Zone Factor Z 0.1 E conc.= 29500000 kN/m2 I crack= 0.80542781 m^4
Importance Factor 1.5 K= 42310 kN/m = 42.31 kN/mm =F
(Refer Modified Seismic Provisions for Cl. 222 of IRC:6-2010) Time period=T= 2 x Sqrt(D/(1000 x F))
Seismic Reduction Factor = 4 D= Dead load in kN = 8707 kN
Sa/g 2.5 T= 0.907 sec Soil Type = Soft
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient, a h = (Z I / 2R) X Sa / g Sa/g= 1.84
Therefore a h = 0.1 X 1.5 / (2 X 4) X 2.5 = 0.046875
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient, a h
0.046875
Design vertical Seismic Coefficient, a v=2/3x Ah
0.03125

Do you want to input diferent values other than default values (Yes=1/No=0) 0 for Superstructure Seismic Forces
Load / Longitudinal Direction Tranverse Direction Seismic
Description Weight (T) Vertical (+,-)
Force (T) Acting at(m) Force (T) Acting at(m)
Superstructure : Dead Load (DL) 527 24.703125 318.621 24.703125 319.795 16.47
DL
Superstructure : Dead Load (DL) , Launching Condition 794 37.207031 318.621 37.207031 319.795 24.80
Superstructure : Superimposed Dead Load (SIDL) 255 11.953125 318.621 11.953125 321.103 7.97
SIDL
Superstructure : SIDL , Launching Condition 0 0 318.621 0 321.103 0.00
Pedestal Substructure : Pier Cap 37 1.74 317.43 1.74 317.43 1.16
& PierCap Substructure : Pedestals 4.65 0.2180273 318.56184 0.2180273 318.561843 0.15
Substructure : Pier with respect to different section
at Different

Section 0 0.00 0.00 #VALUE! 0.00 #VALUE! 0.00

Section

Section 0 0.00 0.00 #VALUE! 0.00 #VALUE! 0.00

Section 0 0.00 0.00 #VALUE! 0.00 #VALUE! 0.00
Pier a

Section 3 57.98 2.72 313.37 2.72 313.37 1.81

Section 2 76.99 3.61 312.37 3.61 312.37 2.41
At Pile Cap Top Level i.e. Section 1 96.00 4.50 311.37 4.50 311.37 3.00
Superstructure : Both Spans and Both Tracks Loaded 315 0 318.621 7.39 322.933 4.93
Superstructure : Both Spans and Single Track Loaded 158 0 318.621 3.70 322.933 2.46
Live Load
Superstructure : Single Span and Both Tracks Loaded 177 0 318.621 4.16 322.933 2.77
Superstructure : Single Span and Single Track Loaded 89 0 318.621 2.08 322.933 1.39

Note-1: As per clause 2.12.6 of Bridge Rules:- Horizontal seismic force due to live load on the bridge shall be ignored when acting in
the direction of traffic but when acting in the direction perpendicular to traffic, this is to be considered for 50% of the design live load
without impact
Note-2:- As per 1.5.1.2 of the Design Basis Report of Tender Document, For calculating the stresses due to vertical effect of live load,
50% of the design live load will be considered at the time of earthquake.
Wind is Critical than Seismic, See wind force calculation
Calculation of Tranverse Moment due to Curvature.
Radius of curvature 5000
Eccentricity at centre Left Span Right Sp.
Span Length 34.00 34.00 eccentricity at mid span
Distance X 4999.971 4999.971 X
Eccentricity at centre 0.029 0.029 R
Average Ecc 0.014 0.014
Dead Load 263.50 263.50
SIDL 127.50 127.50
Transverse Moment
Due to Dead Load 3.81 3.81
Due to SIDL 1.84 1.84
Due to LL 0.85 0.85
Due to FFLL 0.13 0.13
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) Designed ByRJN Date:- 11-May-17
Location:- Pier Near TP-2
R-2 4A

FORCES DUE TO CURVATURE AND ECCENTRICITY OF TRACK (Refer Clause 8.4 of DBR)

LIVE LOAD REACTION (Taken from Page I/O-2)

Both Span Both Track Loaded 207.26 T

Loaded Single Track Loaded 103.63 T
Single Span Both Track Loaded 118.19 T
Loaded
Single Track Loaded 59.10 T

R= radius of Curvature (keep blank if curvature=0) 5000 m

V=Maximum speed (as per Tender Document) 80 Km/Hr
W = Total live load Reaction on Pier= T
C = Horizontal effect in T = (W x V 2)/127R = T
Application of the centrifugal force above rail level [as
1830 mm
per IRS Bridge Rule, 1830mm for BG and 1450mm for MG]

Calculation of Centrifugal Force for Respective Load Cases:-

AS PER EUDL
Load cases W(T) C(T) Acting at (m) C(T) Acting at (m)
Both Span Both Track Loaded 207.26 2.09
Loaded Single Track Loaded 103.63 1.04
322.933 2.19 322.933
Single Span Both Track Loaded 118.19 1.19
Loaded Single Track Loaded 59.10 0.60

Selection of Centrifugal Load approach :- (Y for Yes, N for No)

1. EUDL, one load is applicable for all load cases = Y
2. Reaction appraoch applicable for respective load cases= N
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) RJN
Prepared By: Date:- 11-May-17
Location:- Pier Near TP-2
R-2 14
Your INPUT has been tagged by CELL
Calculation of loads at bottom of pile cap level.
Input For Pile Cap Unit Design Value Remarks
Diameter of Pile m 1.2
No. of Piles in group no. 4
Spacing of pile m 3.6 Default Spacing :-3D
Depth of Pile Cap m 1.8 Default depth:-1.5D
Pile Cap Area m^2 - 26.01
Volume of Pile Cap m^3 - 46.82
Weight of Pile Cap T - 117.05
CG of cap from bottom m - 0.90
CG of cap Level m - 305.42
Orientation of Pile cap Long Long Input should be either "Long"
or "Trans" for 3 or 6 pile group;
Wt of Soil over Pile Cap Also refer to worksheet for
pilegroup
Area of Top of Pile cap 26.01 m^2 Ground Level = 306.82 m
Area of Pier at Pile Cap Level 3.80 m^2 Pile Cap Levef = 306.32 m
Volume of Soil 11.10 m^3 Height of Soil above Pile Cap = 0.50 m
Wt of Soil @ 1.8 T/m^3 19.99 T CG Level of Soil Mass= 306.57 m
Crash Barrier Around The Pier Des. Value Design Value
Weight of Crash Barrier (T) 23.57 CG level of Crash Barrier 0.70
Weight of Crash Barrier above GL(T) 14.92 CG level of Crash Barrier (for the part above GL) 0.99
Eccentricity Of Pile Group with respect to Pier Centre Important Input
Description Unit Design value Default Value Input (if any)
Along X / Longitudinal Direction ex(P.G) m 0.053 0.053 0
Along Y / Transverse Direction ey(P.G) m 0.053 0.053 0
Properties of Design Pile Group Remarks / Extra calculation
Longitudinal Direction i.e. X Max modulus of pile group in X direction = 0.14 m^3
direction Min modulus of pile group in X direction = 0.14 m^3
Transverse Direction i.e. Y Max modulus of pile group in Y direction = 0.14 m^3
direction Min modulus of pile group in Y direction = 0.14 m^3
Note:- The layout and details of the respective pile group are to be taken from the worksheet "Pilegroup"

Safe Load Carrying Capacity of Pile :-

Vertical Safe Load (T) Safe Tension (T) Horizontal Load (T)
725 40 30
Give as +ve input
Actual Load on the Piles Following Later Loads and Moments are Resultant Forces
Description Actual Load / pile(T) Check Corresponding Forces
Vertical Maximum Load (T) 637 Lateral Load =
OK 24 Moment = 0
Tension or Minimum Load (T) 69 Lateral Load =
OK 23 Moment = 0
Max Load = 637
Maximum HorizontalLoad(T) 24 OK Moment =
Min Load = 86 0
Max Load = 593
Maximum Moment(T-m) 0 - Lateral Load=
Min Load = 146 17
Note that in case of Seismic or Wind SUMMARY OF FORCES (at top of pile) FOR SECTION DESIGN
Case the pile capacity is increased in Load Case Vertical Load P(T) Lateral Load (T) Moment at Top (T-m)
appropriate percentage. Case-1 637 24 0
Case-2 69 23 0
Case-3 637 24 0
Case-4 86 24 0
Case-5 593 17 0
% increase for Seismic / wind 25.00% Case-6 146 17 0
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) Prepared By: RJN Date:- 11-May-17
Location:- Pier Near TP-2 R-2 15
SUMMARY OF FORCES AT TOP OF PILE CAP LEVEL i.e. SECTION-1

Level of Section -1= 306.322 m Reference Section 1.00 FOR PILE FOUNDATION

Load / Longitudinal Direction Tranverse Direction

Sl. No. Description Weight (T) Moment Moment
Force (T) HL Acting at(m) Force (T) HT Acting at(m)
ML MT
1 Superstructure DL 527.00 0.00 7.62
2 Superstructure SIDL 255.00 0.00 3.68
3 Disloged Superstructure DL 793.75 674.69 3.81
4 Disloged Superstructure SIDL 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 Substructure Pedestal 4.65
6 Substructure Piercap 37.04
7 Substructure Pier 96.00
8 Pile Cap 117.05
9 Soil over the Pile cap 19.99
10 Crash Barrier 23.57
11 Live Load :-
+Braking / Both Span Both Track Loaded 315.50 55.50 318.62 715.96 27.20 321.10 405.97
Tracking + Loaded Single Track Loaded 157.75 29.58 318.62 380.46 13.60 321.10 574.12
12 Racking+FPL
Single Span Both Track Loaded
L+DeckTrans
177.41 55.50 318.62 833.33 13.60 321.10 202.99
Loaded Single Track Loaded 88.70 29.58 318.62 439.14 6.80 321.10 307.21
Derailment Load Single Track derailed 120.32 25.60 321.10 871.71
13
Both Track Loaded 25.60 321.10 871.71
14 Long Welded Rail (LWR) 35.70 318.62 439.07 0.24 318.62 2.99
15 Centrifugal Force Due To Curvature 2.19 322.93 36.33
16 Seismic case:-
16.1.1 Service Superstructure DL 16.47 24.70 318.62 303.82 24.70 319.80 332.83
16.1.2 condition Superstructure SIDL 7.97 11.95 318.62 147.01 11.95 321.10 176.68
16.2.1 Disloged Superstructure DL 24.80 37.21 318.62 457.61 37.21 319.80 501.29
16.2.2 condition Superstructure SIDL 0.00 0.00 318.62 0.00 0.00 321.10 0.00
16.3.1 Pedestals 0.15 0.22 318.56 2.67 0.22 318.56 2.67
Sub-
16.3.2 PierCap 1.16 1.74 317.43 19.29 1.74 317.43 19.29
Structure
16.3.3 Pier 3.00 4.50 311.37 22.72 4.50 311.37 22.72
16.4 Live Load :-
16.4.1 Including Both Span Both Track Loaded 4.93 0.00 318.62 0.00 7.39 322.93 122.83
16.4.2 Breaking / Loaded Single Track Loaded 2.46 0.00 318.62 0.00 3.70 322.93 61.41
Tracking
16.4.3 Single Span Both Track Loaded 2.77 0.00 318.62 0.00 4.16 322.93 69.07
16.4.4 Loaded Single Track Loaded 1.39 0.00 318.62 0.00 2.08 322.93 34.53
16.5 Pile Cap 3.66 5.49 305.42 -4.94 5.49 305.42 -4.94
16.6 Soil over the Pile cap 0.62 0.94 306.57 0.23 0.94 306.57 0.23
16.7.1 Crash Barrier 0.74 1.10 0.70 -337.66 1.10 0.70 -337.66
16.7.2 Crash Barrier Part (above GL) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

IS THE PILE CAP IN FILLED UP SOIL / LIQUIFACTION ZONE ?

1
( 1 for Yes and 0 for NO)

LIVE LOAD
Longitudinal Forces
Description
Due to Eccentricity Due to Braking / Tractive Total ML
Both Span Both Track Loaded 33.42 683 716
Loaded Single Track Loaded 16.71 364 380
Single Span Both Track Loaded 135.63 698 833
Loaded Single Track Loaded 67.81 371 439
Remarks:-
 Project:- NAGPUR METRO Revision No. Page No
STUP Consultants (P) Prepared By: RJN Date:- 11-May-17
Location:- Pier Near TP-2 R-2 16
(As per clause 5.13 of IRS Bridge Substructure and Foundation Code)
LF- Longitudinal force
GI 1.00DL + 1.2SIDL + 1.1LL + 1.1LF +1.1TF LWR is considered only for SLS condition
G II a 1.0DL(Launching) + 1.2 SIDL +1.0EQ (Long. & Vertical Up)
G II a' (i) 1.00DL + 1.2SIDL + 1.0LL + 1.0LF +1.0TF+1.0 LWR (Both Span Both Track)
G II a' (ii) 1.0DL + 1.2 SIDL + 1.0LL + 1.0LF +1.0 TF+1.0 LWR (Both Span Single Track)
G II a' (iii) 1.00DL + 1.2SIDL + 1.0LL + 1.0LF +1.0 TF+1.0 LWR (Single Span Both Track)
G II b (i) 1.00DL + 1.2SIDL + 1.00LL(50%) + 1.00LF/TF(50%) + 1.00EQ(Horizontal (Long.) & vertical downward)
G II b (ii) 1.00DL + 1.2SIDL + 1.0LL(50%) + 1.00LF/TF(50%) + 1.00EQ(Horizontal (Long.) & vertical upward)
G II b (iii) 1.00DL + 1.2SIDL + 1.00LL(50%) + 1.00LF/TF(50%) + 1.00EQ(Horizontal (Trans) & vertical downward)
G II b (iv) 1.00DL + 1.2SIDL + 1.00LL(50%) + 1.00LF/TF(50%) + 1.00EQ(Horizontal (Trans) & vertical upw Pile Group Eccentricity w.r,t Pier
GV 1.00DL + 1.2SIDL + 1.0LL+1.00/1.75 *Derail L Along X (Long)Direction (m) 0.053033
Comb-4b DL + SIDL + LL +Derail Load (Double Span Loaded) Along Y (Trans)Direction (m) 0.053033
0.13889
This load combinations are based on SLS condition 0.13889
LOAD COMBINATION LOADS ON PILE GROUP LOADS ON PILE
Index Description P (T) HL (T) HT (T) ML (Tm) MT (Tm) Pmax Pmin Lateral(H) Moment
Both Span Both Track Loaded 1478 61 32 976 635 593 146 17 0
Loaded Single Track loaded 1305 33 17 546 784 511 141 9 0
GI
Single Span Both Track Loaded 1326 61 17 1097 377 536 127 16 0
Loaded Single Track Loaded 1229 33 10 607 473 457 157 9 0
G II a Launching Case 1102 51 15 985 151 433 118 13 0
G II a' (i) LWR +Both Sapn Both Track 1447 91 30 1396 587 637 86 24 0
G II a' (ii) LWR +Both Sapn Single Track 1289 65 16 1005 723 562 82 17 0
G II a' (iii) LWR + Single Sapn Both Track 1309 91 16 1506 353 585 69 23 0
G II b (i) Both Span Both Track Loaded 1301 78 32 721 460 489 161 21 0
(Long Loaded Single Track loaded 1221 65 24 526 508 449 162 17 0
Seis, Vert Single Span Both Track Loaded 1231 78 24 776 325 461 155 21 0
down) Loaded Single Track Loaded 1186 65 20 553 357 423 170 17 0
G II b (ii) Both Span Both Track Loaded 1280 78 32 720 459 484 156 21 0
(Long Loaded Single Track loaded 1201 65 24 525 507 444 157 17 0
Seis, Vert Single Span Both Track Loaded 1211 78 24 775 324 455 150 21 0
up) Loaded Single Track Loaded 1167 65 20 552 356 418 166 17 0
G II b (iii) Both Span Both Track Loaded 1301 43 73 550 768 508 142 21 0
(Trans Loaded Single Track loaded 1221 30 62 355 767 461 149 17 0
Seis, Vert Single Span Both Track Loaded 1231 43 63 605 591 474 142 19 0
down) Loaded Single Track Loaded 1186 30 57 382 596 432 161 16 0
G II b (iv) Both Span Both Track Loaded 1280 43 73 549 767 503 137 21 0
(Trans Loaded Single Track loaded 1201 30 62 354 766 456 145 17 0
Seis, Vert Single Span Both Track Loaded 1211 43 63 604 590 469 137 19 0
up) Loaded Single Track Loaded 1167 30 57 381 595 427 156 16 0
Single Span Both Track Loaded 1377 55 15 1006 849 602 87 14 0
GV
Single Span Single Track Loaded 1289 30 8 561 937 530 114 8 0
Both Span Both Track Loaded 1447 91 30 1396 587 637 86 24 0
Normal
Loaded Single Track loaded 1289 65 16 1005 723 562 82 17 0
Case +
LWR Single Span Both Track Loaded 1309 91 16 1506 353 585 69 23 0
Loaded Single Track Loaded 1220 65 9 1060 440 513 97 16 0
NOTE:- Description Max P MaxTens Max H Max M
ML=ML(at top of pilecap)+HL*Ht. of Pile Cap Envelope of Maximum Forces 637.16 69.04 23.97 0
Depth of Pile Cap = 1.8 m Pmax - - 637 593
Pmin - - 86 146
Corresponding Forces
Lateral H 23.97 23.15 - 17
Moment at top of pile M 0.00 0.00 0 -
Load Case For:-
Maximum Load :- LWR Case : Both Span and Both Track Loaded
Minimum Load or Max Tension:- LWR Case : Single Span and Both Track Loaded
Maximum Horizontal Force:- LWR Case : Both Span and Both Track Loaded
Maximum Moment :- Normal Case : Both Span and Both Track Loaded
 Pile Foundation Design Project NAGPUR METRO
STUP Consultants (P) Ltd. Based on Rivet Theory Designed by RJN Date 11-May-17
Developed By :- Amit Chakraborty Location Pier Near TP-2
Input For Pile:- Page= 19
Number of Columns are to be designed? 1 R-2 Diameter of Pile= 1200 mm Remarks:-
Number of Load Cases considered? 26 MaximumVertical = 7250 KN 1. Reactions of columns are to be copied from
Want to view detail results?(Y/N) Y Edge in m 0.15 Maximum Tension= -400 KN STAAD or other analysis software and pest at A21.
Manually also reactions can be given but those data
If Yes, Column Node No = 1 Maximum Horizontal= 300 KN
should follow the same format.
Spacing of Piles=
Print (Y/N)?N Y 0.225 Consider 2. For Single Pile & Double Piles, Moment in
To print detail 3.6 m piles are not shown.
Start Col Sl. No Edge Distance 150 mm Calculation Progress Counter
1 Mx Height of Pile cap in m Column Case PileFdn PileNo
End Col Sl. No X
Long. Consider 1 26 4 4
1 1.8 m Complete Direction:- Long
Mz
Max Number of Piles to be used in Fdn= 12 12 (upperlimit 12)Top of pile cap below GL in m
Minmum Number of Piles to be used in Fdn= 4 4 0.5
Percentage of increase in capacity (%)= 25.00% (In case of Seismic / Wind)
Trans OUT PUT
Column / Case No P(x), KN Z
P(y), KN P(z), KN Mx (KN-m) My(KN-m) Mz(KN-m) Seis / Wind No. Orientation Pmax (KN) Pmin(KN) H(KN Remarks
(Y/N)
1 Comb-1 610.45 14783.44 323.26 6351.64 0.00 9758.36 N 4 Long 6615.528 -132.0102 206.9478 OK
Comb-2 325.33 13048.20 173.66 7839.94 0.00 5462.60 N 4 Long 5805 -47 145 OK
Comb-3 610.45 13264.47 173.66 3768.95 0.00 10968.93 N 4 Long 6088 -201 185 OK
Comb-4 325.33 12288.72 98.86 4729.03 0.00 6067.88 N 4 Long 5342 119 132 OK
Comb-5 511.90 11022.85 153.57 1509.88 0.00 9852.07 Y 4 Long 3950 1088 122 OK
Comb-6 911.95 14467.94 296.30 5873.93 0.00 13959.12 N 4 Long 6994 -642 251 OK
Comb-7 652.75 12890.46 160.30 7226.93 0.00 10053.89 N 4 Long 6257 -565 189 OK
Comb-8 911.95 13087.06 160.30 3526.03 0.00 15059.64 N 4 Long 6514 -705 235 OK
Comb-9 783.87 13006.52 321.04 4603.49 0.00 7211.99 Y 4 Long 5054 690 206 OK
Comb-10 654.27 12210.39 241.95 5075.39 0.00 5258.98 Y 4 Long 4659 752 173 OK
Comb-11 783.87 12309.61 243.33 3250.43 0.00 7761.91 Y 4 Long 4793 678 198 OK
Comb-12 654.27 11861.93 203.09 3571.79 0.00 5533.94 Y 4 Long 4438 837 169 OK
Comb-13 783.87 12796.33 321.04 4592.34 0.00 7200.85 Y 4 Long 5006 648 206 OK
Comb-14 654.27 12014.99 241.95 5065.02 0.00 5248.62 Y 4 Long 4615 713 173 OK
Comb-15 783.87 12112.37 243.33 3239.97 0.00 7751.45 Y 4 Long 4748 638 198 OK
Comb-16 654.27 11673.00 203.09 3561.77 0.00 5523.92 Y 4 Long 4395 798 169 OK
Comb-17 429.39 13006.52 727.27 7677.23 0.00 5501.92 Y 4 Long 5216 528 221 OK
Comb-18 299.79 12210.39 622.30 7672.64 0.00 3548.91 Y 4 Long 4765 647 190 OK
Comb-19 429.39 12309.61 626.91 5907.07 0.00 6051.83 Y 4 Long 4907.9 562 203 OK
Comb-20 299.79 11861.93 572.12 5960.49 0.00 3823.86 Y 4 Long 4519 755 180 OK
Comb-21 429.39 12796.33 727.27 7666.08 0.00 5490.77 Y 4 Long 5169 485 221 OK
Comb-22 299.79 12014.99 622.30 7662.27 0.00 3538.54 Y 4 Long 4720 607 190 OK
Comb-23 429.39 12112.37 626.91 5896.61 0.00 6041.37 Y 4 Long 4863 522 203 OK
Comb-24 299.79 11673.00 572.12 5950.47 0.00 3813.84 Y 4 Long 4476 717 180 OK
Comb-25 554.95 13774.61 148.50 8492.56 0.00 10062.75 N 4 Long 6634 -481 145 OK
Comb-26 295.75 12887.56 80.50 9365.37 0.00 5607.26 N 4 Long 5955 -190 91 OK
 Pile Foundation Design Project NAGPUR METRO
STUP Consultants (P) Ltd.
R-2
Based on Rivet Theory Designed by RJN Date 11-May-17 Page= 20
Developed By :- Amit Chakraborty Location Pier Near TP-2

Y
Detail Calculation:- For Column Node No. = 1 Parameters:- Enhanced Pile Capacity for Seismic / Wind
Diameter of Pile = 1200 mm Vertical Capacity of Pile= 9063 KN
Size of Pile Cap Vertical Capacity of Pile= 7250 KN Tension Capacity of Pile=(-ve value)
-500 KN
L in m = 5.10 B in m= 5.10 -400
Tension Capacity of Pile=(-ve value) KN Mx X Horizontal capacity = 375 KN
Depth of Pile Cap = 1.8 m Horizontal capacity = 300 KN Long.
Weight of Pile Cap= 1366 KN Spacing of Pile = 3.6 m Mz
Edge Distance of Pile Cap= 0.15 m
Orientation of Pile Group = Longitudinal
Reaction (Directly Taken From Analysis) Geometry of Pile Foundation
Seis / Trans Z
Column /
Case No P(x), KN P(y), KN P(z), KN Mx (KN-m)My(KN-m) Mz(KN-m) Wind Pile Fdn proposed with 4 Piles
Node No
(Y/N)
1 Comb-1 542 12967 626 15214 0 9077 N Co-ordinates
Comb-2 289 11517 502 16005 0 5063 N Pile No. X(m) Z(m) XCoeff Zcoeff Layout of Piles (NTS)
Comb-3 542 11774 502 12614 0 10028 N 1 1.80 1.80 0.14 0.14
-1.80 1.80
Comb-4 289 10920 441 13265 0 5539 N 2 -1.80 1.80 -0.139 0.139 1.80 1.80
Comb-5 468 10076 140 1962 0 8342 Y 3 -1.80 -1.80 -0.14 -0.14
Comb-6 787 12703 623 14876 0 12615 N 4 1.80 -1.80 0.14 -0.14
Comb-7 556 11385 511 15594 0 8966 N Z X Axis
Comb-8 787 11618 511 12512 0 13480 N
Comb-9 699 11488 439 9468 0 6242 Y
Comb-10 583 10823 373 9650 0 4417 Y
Comb-11 699 10941 375 8140 0 6674 Y
-1.80 1.80
Comb-12 583 10549 342 8332 0 4633 Y

Z Axis
-1.80 -1.80
Comb-13 699 11308 439 9458 0 6232 Y
Comb-14 583 10655 373 9641 0 4408 Y
Comb-15 699 10771 375 8131 0 6665 Y X
Comb-16 583 10387 342 8323 0 4624 Y
Comb-17 382 11488 798 11911 0 4968 Y
Comb-18 267 10823 712 11680 0 3143 Y (Pile Cap as shown is schematic only)
Comb-19 382 10941 717 10243 0 5400 Y 12.96 12.96 PileCap Dimension:-
Comb-20 267 10549 671 10192 0 3359 Y X^2 Z^2 Length Lx in m = 5.10 m
Comb-21 382 11308 798 11901 0 4959 Y Length Lz in m = 5.10 m
Comb-22 267 10655 712 11671 0 3135 Y Xcoeff= X / X^2,
Zcoeff= Z / ^2
Comb-23 382 10771 717 10234 0 5391 Y
Comb-24 267 10387 671 10184 0 3351 Y Load in Pile = P=(Py+Wt of Pile Cap)/ (No. of Piles)+Mx . Z Coeff of Pile + Mz . X Coeff of the Pile
Comb-25 493 12306 309 16409 0 9202 N Percentage of increase in Pile Capa for Wind / seismic Case =25.00%
Comb-26 262 11530 253 17001 0 5120 N

Load Cases
Pile No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1 6616 5805 6088 5342 3950 6994 6257 6514 5054 4659 4793 4438 5006 4615 4748 4395 5216 4765 4908 4519 5169 4720 4863 4476 6634 5955
2 4094 4399 3302 3803 1633 3490 3767 2770 3320 3433 2939 3151 3275 3391 2896 3110 3836 3891 3408 3586 3791 3850 3365 3546 4078 4533
3 -132 -47 -201 119 1088 -642 -565 -705 690 752 678 837 648 713 638 798 528 647 562 755 485 607 522 717 -481 -190
4 2389 1360 2584 1657 3405 2862 1926 3039 2424 1979 2531 2124 2379 1937 2489 2083 1908 1520 2063 1688 1863 1478 2020 1648 2075 1232

P(Max) 6616 5805 6088 5342 3950 6994 6257 6514 5054 4659 4793 4438 5006 4615 4748 4395 5216 4765 4908 4519 5169 4720 4863 4476 6634 5955
P(Min) -132 -47 -201 119 1088 -642 -565 -705 690 752 678 837 648 713 638 798 528 647 562 755 485 607 522 717 -481 -190
H(Max) 207 145 185 132 122 251 189 235 206 173 198 169 206 173 198 169 221 190 203 180 221 190 203 180 145 91
Remarks OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

P(Max) 1734 1579 1601 1479 1675 1770 1629 1649 1765 1687 1698 1638 1743 1666 1677 1618 1809 1716 1730 1661 1786.76 1694.48 1708.43 1640.15 1734.45 1623.33
P(Min) 981 936 949 953 667 909 867 879 772 758 763 768 748 735 739 745 728 729 731 746 703.404 705.968 707.852 723.352 885.371 889.122
H(Max) 32 17 29 15 101 46 33 44 114 108 113 107 114 108 113 107 118 109 112 106 118.056 109.208 111.824 106.057 25.8918 13.8953
Remarks OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK