Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Classroom/Lesson Context
A. Skills/procedures:
The students will analyze the difference between living organisms and non-living
materials, such as plants, animals, and other non-living materials.
B. Prior Academic Knowledge and Conceptions:
No extended prior knowledge is needed for this lesson. Though some students may be
more familiar with living and non-living things, all students will get an equal chance to
learn about living organisms and non-living materials.
Some students may have already been exposed to living and non-living things and the
differences that separate each category. Students that have not been exposed to living
and non-living things will still learn and understand the differences between living
organisms and non-living materials.
Students will have been exposed to lecture/hands-on activities which will enable them to
accurately participate in the lesson.
A. Differentiation plan:
To provide students access to learning based on individual and group needs, I will
assess students and monitor them throughout the lesson to determine if they are
understanding the objectives. For Tier 3 students, I will provide a living/non-living picture
sort. For Tier 2 students, I can provide a living/non-living word sort, and for Tier 1
students, I can provide a blank living/non-living T-Chart where the students will generate
their own list of living organisms and non-living materials.
For students that do not understand the lesson, I will pull the struggling students out and
generate a small group discussion. I will provide these students with another activity
with fewer items/pictures and discuss which items are living and which are non-living as
a group.
B. Student Interactions
While the students and I are filling out the T-Chart, I will have them discuss with their
neighbor what organisms and materials they think are living or non-living. They will
also discuss why the things they chose are living or why they are non-living.
C. What Ifs
It may be difficult for students to recognize the differences between living organisms
and non-living materials. Students may not accurately classify different things as
living or non-living. If this happens, I will be ready to make adjustments and pull a
small group of the struggling individuals to work with them and deeper their
understanding of living organisms and non-living materials.
Jean Piagets theory of constructivism proves that the learning tasks for this lesson are
most appropriate to help my students understand this lesson. Constructivism is
predominantly applicable to the teaching and learning of science. Students build and
construct new ideas and concepts based upon prior knowledge and new information. In
this lesson, students are familiarizing themselves with the differences between living
organisms and non-living materials and examples of each. This will allow them to correct
any misconceptions and build understanding of the objectives. Constructivism describes
learning as the active construction of knowledge which makes the learning tasks of this
lesson appropriate.
Materials
Vocabulary
Analyzing Teaching
A. Worked/Didn't Worked
Students accurately labeled their cut and paste activity which proved they understood
the lesson. The book I read on living and non-living things engaged the students and
helped them grasp the difference between living organisms and non-living materials.
As I was teaching, students had a hard time staying focused. The lesson took much
longer than planned due to behavioral problems. Because of this, some students did not
have time to finish the cut and paste activity I provided them.
Overall, the lesson worked very well for the students and for myself, the teacher. The
students understood the lesson, however, I had a hard time keeping them on task.
B. Adjustments
I would use the instructional strategy of forming groups for the next lesson. I will place
my students in their Tier groups and teach the lesson in a small group format. By
implementing small groups, I will be able to accurately hit each students needs and
teach them on the level the learn best. Working in a small group setting will also
eliminate many behavioral problems associated with whole group discussion which will
keep students on task.
C. Proposed Changes
If you could teach this lesson again to this group of students what changes would you
make to your instruction?
Whole group: I would have done an activity that would be more hands on for the
students. Instead of pasting the pictures on the T-Chart as a class, I would have
provided three-dimensional objects that the students could see and feel to better
understand the difference between living and non-living things.
Group of Students: While Tier 1 students worked on a more challenging activity, such as
coming up with their own examples of living and non-living things and listing them under
the correct category, I would have worked with the Tier 2 and 3 students in groups to
complete the cut and paste activity.
Individual Students: While I work with the rest of the class, I would have the
paraprofessional pull individual students that didnt understand the lesson to the back of
the classroom to work one-on-one and complete the cut and paste activity. This will also
better their understanding of living and non-living things.
D. Justification
These changes will be the best way to help students stay on task and better understand
the lesson on living and non-living things. Forming groups and teaching students based
on individual needs will not only keep them engaged and interested in what I am
teaching, but it will also help keep them on task and prevent behavioral problems.
All students learn differently. Learning styles fall into three categories: Visual,
Kinesthetic, and Auditory. Research on the different learning styles supports these
changes because my students need to be broken into groups based on their learning
styles to effectively learn and apply the knowledge they have learned.