Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
!
Kia!Darling*Hammond!
Stanford!University!
****!
!
A B S T R A C T !The!purpose!of!this!research!is!to!examine!contexts!for!thriving!among!young!adults!
(age! 18<30)! living! at! the! intersections! of! gender,! sexuality,! and! racial/ethnic! identities! that!
society! considers! to! be! other! or! non<normative! (LGBTQ+/SGL1! of! color).! A! small,! though!
robust! and! growing,! literature! centers! these! populations,! though! with! greater! attention! to!
school! age! youth,! rather! than! emerging! adults.! Very! few! studies! examine! states! of! self<
actualization!or!other!concepts!of!what!could!be!termed!thriving!for!this!population.!Instead,!
most! literature! emphasizes! the! risks,! traumas,! and! challenges! these! young! people! face,! and!
situates! their! lives! as! struggles! for! survival! in! the! face! of! exclusion,! rejection,! and! violence.!
Through!a!qualitative!phenomenological!study!using!semi<structured!one<on<one!interviews,!I!
explore:! (1)! How! and! under! what! circumstances! do! queer! youth! and! young! adults! of! color!
believe! they! experience! thriving?! (2)! What! new! information! is! revealed! when! we! center! the!
lived! experiences! and! survival! literacies! of! LGBTQ+/SGL<identified! youth! and! young! adults! of!
color!to!better!understand!possibilities!for!thriving?!(3)!What!potential!lies!in!using!these!young!
peoples! thriving! as! our! grand! metric! for! success,! whether! it! be! institutional,! social,! or!
personal?!(4)!How!does!this!reshape!how!we!think!about!ways!to!support!and!nurture!these!and!
other! young! people?! Early! analysis! has! revealed! emergent! dimensions! of! thriving! explored!
further!below.!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1
!LGBTQ+/SGL!stands!for!lesbian,!gay,!bisexual,!trans,!queer,!questioning,!intersex,!asexual,!pansexual,!polysexual,!demisexual,!
two<spirit,!non<gender!conforming!/!same!gender!loving,!and!other!unlabeled!or!yet<to<be!identified!gender!or!sexual!
experiences!that!transgress!socially!imposed!boundaries!of!normative!gender,!gender!performance,!and!sexuality!(i.e.!
cisgender,!heterosexual,!and!either!masculine!male!or!feminine!female).!This!dynamic!array!of!labels!is!also!sometimes!
encapsulated!by!the!abbreviation!SGM!(sexual!and!gender!minorities).!Those!who!identify!as!same-gender-loving!may!not!
identify!as!gay,!bisexual,!or!lesbian.!The!term!was!coined!by!activist!Cleo!Manago!to!be!used!by!African!diasporic!and!
Black!people!in!lieu!of!terms!like!gay,!bisexual,!and!lesbian,!which!he!deemed!Eurocentric!and!oppressive.!In!this!essay,!I!
often!use!the!term!queer!to!encapsulate!this!indescribably!diverse!array!of!non<normative!gender!and!sexual!identities.!I!
acknowledge!the!fraught!history!of!the!term,!but!note!that!its!reclamation!through!self<identification!has!served!to!undermine!
the!power!of!hatred!and!oppression!that!it!once!accompanied,!beginning!the!disruption!of!deeply!embedded!structures!that!
would!otherwise!reproduce!the!same.!Notable,!also,!is!the!frequency!with!which!my!interviewees!choose!to!describe!
themselves!as!queer,!citing!a!similar!logic!as!Manago!in!his!advancement!of!the!term!same<gender!loving.!Many!of!todays!
youth!and!young!adults!have!eschewed!labels!altogether!as!an!act!of!claiming!power!and!the!right!to!simply!be.!I!use!the!term!
of-color!to!describe!non<white!racial!minorities.!The!term!youth!is!used!to!denote!people!in!the!stages!between!early!
adolescence!and!early!adulthood,!while!the!term!young-adult!describes!people!between!the!ages!of!18!and!30.!I!use!the!terms!
interchangeably.!For!an!excellent!discussion!of!the!terms!queer!and!of!color,!please!see!Chan,!K.!et!al.!(2001),!pages!2<6.!
1 Davis 2017!
Queer Young Adults of Color Thriving
K. Darling-Hammond
Research Questions.
!
1)! How and under what circumstances do queer youth and young adults of color
believe they experience thriving?
2)! What new information is revealed when we center the lived experiences and survival
literacies of LGBTQ+/SGL-identified youth and young adults of color to better
understand possibilities for thriving?
3)! What potential lies in using these young peoples thriving as our grand metric for
success, whether it be institutional, social, or personal?
4)! How does this reshape how we think about ways to support and nurture these and
other young people?
Methods.
! Phenomenological approach building a framework of thriving from participant
responses, rather than imposing one from the literature (Singh, 2013; Singh 2014).
! Interview guide asked open-ended questions, not prescriptive. Participants complete
two semi-structured interviews, each separated by at least a few weeks.
! Though I dont assume all LGBTQ+ young adults of color have thriving narratives, I do
assume they have not-thriving stories to tell. Thus, I asked participants for information
on both thriving and not-thriving.
! The interview guide contains questions about specific supports for and barriers to
thriving with probes to surface identity and non-identity specific experiences.
! To manage the possibility that what I imagine thriving to be might be very different
from what my participants do, I ask about it in several different ways: as their own
definition of thriving, as not-thriving, as utopia, and in relationship to an imagined
future self.
! Early interviews were conducted over video, but subsequent interviews have largely
been in person at a location of the participants choosing.
Participants.
! Participants identify as (1) LGBTQI+, (2) Black, Latinx, Asian, and/or of color, (3) are
between the ages of 18-30, and (4) currently reside in the United States of America.
! Snowball sampling with word-of-mouth referral by participants to encourage comfort
and trust (Noy, 2008).
! Outreach through Facebook, email, occasionally text messaging to initiate contact,
then an emailed briefing message with consent form. The form was reviewed at the
start of each interview.
! I have completed sixteen first-round interviews nine are analyzed for presentation
here, and four second-round interviews (analysis pending).
!
2 Davis 2017
Queer Young Adults of Color Thriving
K. Darling-Hammond
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
3 Davis 2017
Queer Young Adults of Color Thriving
K. Darling-Hammond
Additional elements:
! Having everything one needs (8)
! Financial security (8), but a world where work is not the primary focus (5)
! Meaningful work (8)
! Safe space (7)
! Control over personal space / time (7)
! Social equality (7)
! Wellness / health support (7)
! Access to nature and the outdoors (6)
! Living authentically (6)
! Becoming or being seen as a leader and/or mentor (4)
! Feeling happy (7), successful (7), a sense of ease (6), confident (4), agentic (4),
fulfilled (4), joyful (3), balanced (3), and courageous (3)
4 Davis 2017
Queer Young Adults of Color Thriving
K. Darling-Hammond
Significance.
1)! Every participant has a thriving narrative. Every participant has imagined a world
that exceeds current reality.
2)! These TUF events are both normal and situated. Participants experiences align
to other frameworks of thriving, but attend to specific dimensions of queer of color
experience.
3)! The considerable thematic overlap offers us a starting point for thinking about how
to support thriving contexts for LGBTQ+ Black, Latinx, and Asian young adults.
4)! There are interesting tensions around participation in social structures/institutions and
achieving happiness, wellness, and self-actualization. It is insufficient, it seems, to
simply do well in school or get a good job and thrive.
5 Davis 2017