Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Crieff 2006
Jochen BARD, Institute for Solar Energy Supply Technology (ISET), Germany
Heikki PIRTTINIEMI, Waterpumps Oy, Finland
Prof. Dr. Eberhard GOEDE, Inst. of Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Machinery,
University of Stuttgart, Germany
Albin MUELLER, ELMOTEC Antriebstechnik AG, Switzerland
Dr. Drona UPADHYAY, IT Power, UK
Martin ROTHERT, SMA Technologie AG, Germany
Funded by:
European Commission, DG TREN
Institut fr Solare Energieversorgungstechnik e.V.
head: 3.6 m
power: 270 kW
discharge: 9 m/s
Turbine: Kaplan
n = 190 rpm
= 1600 mm
disadvantages of gearboxes
0,9
0,8
0,7
power train efficiency
0,6
PME generator
0,5
ASG+belt
0,4
old power train (ASG+ gear box)
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Power [%]
ITT Flygth
Stator windings
direct flow cooling
draft tube
Rotor
= filter
G choke
3~
3~
G 3~ = Sinus
3~ = 3~ Choke
3~ =
G
= 3~
U, f Netz ok
earth fault
Adap ME U Netz
24 V DC 24 V DC auxiliary supply
230 V AC auxiliary supply
RS 232
(interfaces, start-up etc.) Modem
Final turbine design for demonstration site Tirva, Finland
30
25
grid power [kW]
20
15
10
0
400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
speed [rpm]
Mar 06
40 Apr 06
35
30
power [kW]
25
20
15
10
0
1 25 49 73 97 121 145 169 193 217 241 265 289 313 337 361 385 409 433 457 481 505 529 553 577 601 625 649 673 697 721
time [h]
Market evaluation of frequency converter cost
1200 600
1000 500
800 400
specific cost [DM/kW]
400 200
200 100
0 0
1 10 100 1000
rated power [kW]
example design
3,18 m head 1510 mm runner
12,4 m/s discharge 265 rpm
324 kW /unit PME-Generator
Cost comparison
7000 0,14
6000 0,12
5000 0,10
Euro/kWh
4000 0,08
Euro/kW
3000 0,06
2000 0,04
Euro/kW
Euro/kWh
1000 Polynomisch ( Euro/kW) 0,02
Polynomisch ( Euro/kWh)
0 0,00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
design flow [m/s]
Conclusions
6
flow [m/s]
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
exceedance days