DnG State PIK

1NC Shell
 1NC: Advocacy:
We affirm the schizoanalytic politics of the 1AC as a
means of political strategy but reject the use of a
government based plan of action.
The 1AC simultaneously defends two interpretations of
political strategy. There is a plan-oriented pragmatic
strategy which surrounds the one sentence traditional
plan text. There is also a bottom-up movement which
takes the form of rhizomatic politics described in the 1AC.
We defend the micropolitical process as described in their
1AC evidence and reject the goals-oriented form of
politics which constructs the plan.
This is sufficient to solve:
Conley 06 (Verena Andermatt, professor of literature at Harvard,
Borderlines; Deleuze and the Contemporary World, 95-100)

Disconnect yourself from the state, from collectives, from everything bigger
than our agency. It is only when desire is confined and controlled, added to
some larger pool, that we lose sight of our ability to form unique judgments
and come to unique conclusions. Recognizing this individualism is necessary
to challenge fascism
Deleuze and Guattari, 1987 [A Thousand Plateaus pg 158-159]
 1NC: Competition
They have to defend the plan as the outcome of their political process.
First is neg ground our best offense is to the ways their philosophy can be applied
to the topic. Everyone would agree in the abstract that fascism is bad but how we
politicize that advocacy is where we get link ground

Second is predictability they read a plan text in the 1AC and its context is left
unexplained. Our pre-round and pre-tournament prep assumes the defense of the
plan pre-round prep is our only chance to develop contextual strategies against
shady critical affs damage to it outweighs because the alternative is another boring
framework debate

Third is severance - New framework explanations in the 2AC which eliminate the
plans importance are severance out of the only stable 1AC advocacy. Unfair
because the 1NC strategy is predicated off of the plans existence which creates a
moving target where we cant ever generate offense.
 1NC: Net Benefits
Link 1 is the Fixidity of the Plan Rhizomatic politics form possibilities but the plan
is a certainty regardless of the process which results in the plan, it stands as a
transcendent monument to the future goals of the movement. Because the plan
dictates what the possible outcomes of rhizomatic politics can and cannot be, it has
already sacrificed the ability to think creatively which is necessary to overcome the
states attempt at counter-revolution
Goddard in 2k6 (July 6th, 2006: The Encounter between Guattari and Berandi
and the Post Modern Era Felix and Alice in Wonderland;
http://www.generation-online.org/p/fpbifo1.htm)

Link 2- Its basically a prisoners dilemma the state will adapt and follow your
politics. It is worthless to challenge the state in a race to control they have the lead
and will copy our strategies before they can become successful. Their political
strategy is doomed to failure.
Dixit and Nalebuff 1993 (Avinash, John F. Sherrard University Professor of
Economics at Princeton and Barry, Professor of economics and management
at the yale school of organization and management. "Thinking Stategically")

Link Three is the Agency Trade-off DA: their focus on the government as the site for
transformative politics trades-off with immediate micropolitical activism. Waiting
for the rev to gain momentum ignores the power we already have to create change.
Your role is to dismiss the promise of future change to affirm already existing
struggles
Deleuze and Parnet 87 (Gilles and Claire, profs of philosophy: Dialogues II: p.
146-147)
Link Four is Goals versus the Process - The status quo is paranoiac even in its
attempt at counter culture. Status quo methodology confines experimentation to
only processes with set goals in mind, destroying these movements from the
beginning. We must instead abandon these final goals and embrace free thought.
Deleuze and Guattari 1972, Anti-Oedipus, 370-1