Criteria Weightage Evaluation Scale 1 (below expectation) 2 3 (acceptable) 4 5 (outstanding) Score Introduction 20 Objectives not clearly defined or none Between below Has outlined objectives and Between acceptable to Has defined objectives in detail and given. Problem to be solved not clearly expectation to addressed them at the end of the outstanding. addressed them comprehensively. defined. acceptable. work. Problem and justification Problem to be solved and the Background study of related literature adequately defined. importance/justification of solution is clearly review and theories not sufficient. Adequate background study of defined. related literature review and theories Extensive background study of related given. literature review and theories given. Methodology 5 Methodology of study not clearly Between below Adequate explanation on Between acceptable to Methodology of study is clearly defined. defined. expectation to methodology of study. outstanding Explains clearly the methods used in data Lack explanation on how the study will acceptable collection, analysis, development of be conducted to achieve project solution. objective. Explains clearly the procedures in conducting the study. Data Collection 15 Data collected not adequate. Between below Adequate data collected. Between acceptable to Complete data gathered. Data properly Data poorly presented. expectation to But data not well presented. outstanding presented in tables, diagrams, etc. acceptable Analysis and 20 Simply restating gathered data and Between below Adequate detail of design with Between acceptable to Detailed analysis with good supporting detail design information. expectation to adequate explanation, diagrams, outstanding evidence. Detail design lack clarity. Explanation acceptable tables and drawings. Shows clearly specifications of detail not complete. Diagrams, tables and design with concise explanation, diagrams, drawings not complete or not given. tables and drawings. Interpretation of 20 Inadequate interpretation of results. Between below Adequate interpretation of results. Between acceptable to Comprehensive and detailed interpretation results and Shallow discussion of results. expectation to Adequate discussion of results outstanding of results. discussion. acceptable demonstrating integration in selection Clear and complete discussion of results and use of theory. demonstrating integration in the selection and use of theory. Able to relate accurately between results, related theories and literature review. Conclusion 10 Unsubstantiated/invalid based on Between below Conclusion partially supported by Between acceptable to Analytical and clear conclusions well generalization only, or no conclusion at expectation to results/findings outstanding grounded in theory and literature showing all. acceptable development of concept and solution to problem. References 5 Irrelevant reference / referencing is Between below Some related reference Between acceptable to Highly related reference, proper format and absent / unsystematic expectation to outstanding consistently accurate. acceptable Organization, 5 Unclear presentation. Disorganized flow Between below Acceptable presentation and timely Between acceptable to Proper language, smooth flow, Clarity, Timely of presentation. expectation to submitted. outstanding grammatically correct, clear diagram, and submitted Late submission (1 days or more) acceptable timely submitted
Total Score 100 /500
% of class project from total mark for the course (10 ~ 20%): ___________________ Total Score ( %): _________________