Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
585
2015 1st International Conference on Futuristic trend in Computational Analysis and Knowledge Management (ABLAZE-2015)
enhance in terms of predictive accuracy and the space and That is used for further learning predictive model
time complexity. development.
In order to enhance the previously designed technique the 4. Proposed data model: The pre-processed log data is
following suggestions are provided. used with the proposed learning model for
recommending the web URLs.
1. User wise web access data clustering: In this phase
5. Traditional data model: In this phase the traditional
the K-mean clustering algorithm is applied on the
data model is implemented for web URL
proxy server log data. Therefore the entire
recommendation.
connected users accessed data from the proxy
6. Recommender data: The learned data model is used
server is grouped according to the IP addresses.
to predict the URLs of next web pages for fetching
2. Prepare the supervised learning model based on
the web pages.
the clustered data: In this phase the ID3 decision
7. Performance analysis: In this phase the
tree algorithm is applied on clustered data, using
performance of the predictive system is measured
the clustered data ID3 prepare the learning model
and visualized.
for prediction.
3. Probability based next web page election and
recommendation design: For finding the next web
accessed page. The selection of web page is
performed using the probability estimation and
KNN algorithm.
In order to justify the proposed modification and
effectiveness of model, both the techniques are required to
simulate. Thus for simulation the following simulation
architecture is proposed for comparative study as given in
figure 1.
586
2015 1st International Conference on Futuristic trend in Computational Analysis and Knowledge Management (ABLAZE-2015)
URLs from the available historical data for the 800 77.37 71.08 6.29
current input sequence. 1000 79.27 73.81 5.46
7. KNN: K-nearest neighbour algorithm is applied
1500 81.42 74.76 6.66
over the URLs, for finding the less distance URLs
2000 85.43 75.09 10.34
as prediction of next prefetching.
8. Recommended Data: The system predicts the According to the given results the performance of the
upcoming web URLs for the currently generated proposed algorithm is higher than traditional algorithm and
user input sequences. increases as the amount of data is increases for training. In
addition of that the tabular data analysis is given using table 1.
III. RESULT ANALYSIS That is also observed the average gain over the traditional
In this section performance of the proposed pre-fetching technique is found 6.014 %.
system is evaluated and compared with the traditional system. Error Rate
The performance comparison between both the techniques is Error rate of the predictive algorithm demonstrate the amount
performed in terms of memory consumption, time consumption, of data which is not correctly recognized using algorithm. That
accuracy and error rate.
Accuracy can be computed using the given formula:
In the predictive systems the accuracy of the system is given as
the amount of data that correctly recognized during
classification of the input test data. The accuracy of the system Or
can be evaluated using the following formula:
Fig. 3. Accuracy
587
2015 1st International Conference on Futuristic trend in Computational Analysis and Knowledge Management (ABLAZE-2015)
As given results in table 2 the error rate of the predictive According to the given results the red line shows the
algorithm improved as the data for training input is increases performance of traditional algorithm and blue line shows the
and about 6.014% enhancing as compared to the traditional performance of proposed algorithm. Where the X axis
predictive technique. demonstrates the data size and the Y axis shows the time in
terms of milliseconds. According to the obtained performance
Memory Used the proposed algorithm consumes less time for training and
Memory consumption is sometimes also termed as the the traditional algorithm consumes higher time.
space complexity. The space complexity demonstrates the
amount of main memory required to successfully execute the
algorithm. The comparative performance of both the
technique is given using figure 5 where the X axis shows the
data size and Y axis shows the memory consumed in terms of
KB. The memory consumption with increasing amount of
data for traditional algorithm is given using red line and the
blue line shows the performance of proposed algorithm.
According to the obtained results the memory consumption of
the proposed algorithm is less than the traditional algorithm.
588
2015 1st International Conference on Futuristic trend in Computational Analysis and Knowledge Management (ABLAZE-2015)
data model is proposed which offer high accuracy during Prefetching Techniques, 978-1-4673-6217-7/13/$31.00 c
prediction with less computational cost. 2013 IEEE.
S. Proposed Traditional
Parameters
No method method
1 Accuracy High Low
2 Error rate Low High
3 Memory consumption Low High
4 Time consumption Low High
REFERENCES
589