design portfolio - 2017

u301 & U302

up721385
conten ts

01 INTRODUCTION TO WINCHESTER
Exploring a first look into Winchester and some of the climate and
urban conditions analysed from research on the town

02 INVASIVE PARADIGM - U301

What happens when a cultural identity clashes with radical ideas
for a productive and efficent town? How do we set up a meaningful
relationship between the two?
03 GENERATIVE NESTS - U302
Looking into creating a new typology and community within the
outskirts of Winchester, with the aim of created a resourceful and
independent social condition

2
ac k nowle dg e me nts

I would like to dedicate this portfolio to a few special people of mine.

Firstly to my tutors, Mr Guido Robazza and Mr Alessandro Melis, for constantly pushing me towards exploring new experimental ideas and concepts. I would be a completely different man without their
support and encouragement

Secondly to Mr Josh Rigelsford and Mr Glyn Whibly for seeing me through the toughest periods and having my back. Their loyalty and support has kept me going throughout third year!

Several changes have been made in response to critical feedback during reviews. For the purproses of this portfolio, all changes are adequately highlighted using a circular dot. A list of prescribed
changes and the reasoning behind them are listed in the page changelog.

CHANGELOG

- List of Changes

3
 DISSECTING
WINCHESTER
uRBAN INvestigation

4
Winchester is a rather unique idyllic location to undertake any
Architectural project. Home to the iconic Winchester Cathedral, this
old Roman town still remains culturally attached to its Roman, Normal
and Medieval roots, and is now the area of residence for a significant
working and retired population. However recently, it has undergone a
few changes, with the city recieving a injection of youthful local university
citizens. On top of this, there is a strong national demand to increase the
level of housing within all countys, particuarly in the wake of Brexit.

We are entering into a new era of uncertainty. How do we combat

against the rising house prices, whilst keeping up with the national
housing demand at an affoardable rate. Moreso, how do we sustain
these cities? With fossil fuels due to be phased out, and cities putting an
unsustainable strain on our resources, it is becoming increasingly
challenging to design a community whilst sticking to a
cultural adherence.

The projects based in this portfolio are grounded in the belief, that
a more radical approach to designing our homes and
urban infrastructure is required to keep up with these
challenges. Therefore, we must show that we a capable of these
demands in both Urban and Rural areas, and set a precedent on its
effectiveness. The projects also aim to prove that radical design does not
have to exist in isolation, but can co-operate with existing infrastructure,
Source : http://www.hampshireconferencebureau.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Winchester-3.jpg

5
winc heste r a na lys i s

U rban co n te m po r a ry Urba n hi sto ri c

6
s ub-U r ba n h i sto r i c s u b - Urban / ru ra l

7
c limate a na lys i s

ove rc ast con di t i o n s avg wi n ds peed avg tem perat ure

8
a nnua l c l i m ate avg precipitatio n wi n d- Ro s e Diag r am

9
u rban a na lys i s

10
railway divide

commercial and recreational centre

When analysed, it is easy to see how divided and unproportiante the zoning and city planning of Winchester is. The city comprises
of mostly residential districts, encompassing a town centre. In most cases, the town centre is the only source of prominent trade and
city boundary line commercial activity. However it is also one of the few areas of work, with various town offices and practices situated within the city
core. There is a relatively small amount of trade occuring towards East Winchester, which controls local imports and exports.
residential Zoning Most educational facilities are placed among the outskirts of the city. The most prominent being the The University of Winchester,
Industrial Zoning which has bought a significant percentage of the youthful population into Winchester, who then interact with the local economy.

On top of this, Winchester also heavily relies on Tourism. Famous for its Winchester Cathedral, cultural Architecture and local
wildlife, Winchester is a desirable idyllic setting. Without it, the capability of Winchesters economy is under question.

In the view of this portfolio, there are some tangible links between these districts and their level of co-operation. However, the city
feels extremely divided from an external perspective. People living on the outskirts lack a more local community area, and are
isolated historic town
forced to travel to the city for convenient goods. Whilst the presence of super-markets are present, they actually de-value the idea of
local integration. A visit to the shops becomes a consumerist idea rather than a social one. Furthermore, the divide in the population
pyramid means that the elderly and youthful section of the population are not properly interacting and engaging with the local
community. A system must be put in place to facilitate a new method of integration.
city radial Lines

CHANGELOG

- Added a more analytical map of

Winchester, highlighting the existance
of the city circle, and the enormity
of the residential sectors. This will
tie back into later projects on how
disconnected the city actually is from
a commercial and entertainment
sector, and highlights the need for
better functional zoning with-in cities.

11
THE INVASIVE
PARADIGM
U301 - uRBAN INTERGRATION

12
In the first project, an extensive study was conducted on the extent
of Urban demographic relationships within the city, and analysing the
neccessary requirements of the city.

It was found that the city is an extensive organism, that is slowly being
polluted and congested. However, an artificial restraint is placed upon
the city, listed buildings and the desire to preserve the heritage of the
town restrict the potential development of the urban centre.

What is also interesting about this urban centre, is the lack of social
provocation. The contrasting demographics do not interact with each
other in this urban centre, and only engage in commercial activity.
Meanwhile, these large open park/green spaces exist in abundance,
where evidence of this activity does exist.

These relationships and juxtapositions are something which should

be valued. It is the aim of this project to determine, What are these
relationships and how can we manipulate these relationships to provide
a new social, residential, recreational and commercial dynamic within the
city centre?

13
c ritic a l a na lys i s
CRITICAL ANALYSIS | //SYMBIOSIS

Interactivity?
Lack of

Monofunctional Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Curabitur
ut efficitur tellus, quis pulvinar nisl. Fusce lobortis ornare velit, quis
ornare leo imperdiet a. Sed mollis sapien vitae velit auctor auctor.
Quisque egestas mattis diam eget bibendum. Interdum et malesua-
Congested? da fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Duis vel massa ac neque
aliquam iaculis sed tincidunt lectus. Donec maximus tortor vitae
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Curabitur
ut efficitur tellus, quis pulvinar nisl. Fusce lobortis ornare velit, quis
ornare leo imperdiet a. Sed mollis sapien vitae velit auctor auctor.
Quisque egestas mattis diam eget bibendum. Interdum et malesua-
da fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Duis vel massa ac neque
aliquam iaculis sed tincidunt lectus. Donec maximus tortor vitae

Preservation
ligula pulvinar, quis laoreet dui pulvinar. Sed aliquet nisl dui, non ligula pulvinar, quis laoreet dui pulvinar. Sed aliquet nisl dui, non
tincidunt leo venenatis id. tincidunt leo venenatis id.
Level of
Sed non congue mauris. Mauris iaculis consequat leo, quis consec- Sed non congue mauris. Mauris iaculis consequat leo, quis consec-

Buildings Contrast and Compliment each other

tetur nulla rhoncus ut. Integer faucibus hendrerit dapibus. Nunc tetur nulla rhoncus ut. Integer faucibus hendrerit dapibus. Nunc
ut ullamcorper purus. Integer fermentum orci at nisi ultricies, quis ut ullamcorper purus. Integer fermentum orci at nisi ultricies, quis
pharetra augue consequat. Phasellus quis felis eget nulla mattis pharetra augue consequat. Phasellus quis felis eget nulla mattis

Outdoor Space is valuable

eleifend. Praesent dictum est eu tellus finibus iaculis. Nunc nisi eleifend. Praesent dictum est eu tellus finibus iaculis. Nunc nisi
sapien, volutpat in est ut, pulvinar congue nibh. Vestibulum auctor, sapien, volutpat in est ut, pulvinar congue nibh. Vestibulum auctor,
augue vitae pulvinar mollis, sapien lacus finibus mauris, vel porta augue vitae pulvinar mollis, sapien lacus finibus mauris, vel porta

Inter-mediatery spaces capture

lacus massa vitae augue. Phasellus mattis ac mi nec condimentum. lacus massa vitae augue. Phasellus mattis ac mi nec condimentum.

Pellentesque vitae vestibulum ipsum, a ultricies lorem. Aenean eget Pellentesque vitae vestibulum ipsum, a ultricies lorem. Aenean eget
urna quam. Proin molestie risus eget placerat faucibus. Nullam urna quam. Proin molestie risus eget placerat faucibus. Nullam

14
 PRECEDENTS | //SYMBIOSIS

symbiotic relationships
One of the problems I experienced with the town is the sudden changes
in density and interactivity. You have these narrow and intimate roads full
of cultural history, but no interaction. Meanwhile you have these open
outdoor spaces which is full of acitivity. It is easy to identify the level of David Closes Lebbeus Woods
congestion and pollution there is in Winchester, which is what makes
these spaces so valued.

Then this project started to propose a more radical potential for the City
of WInchester. Could we insert more outdoor spaces and responsive
Architecture to provide for the city? With increasing public demands for
energy and nutrition, is there a way to source these locally? PRECEDENTS | //SYMBIOSIS

With this in mind, this project starts to explore the work of many
radical Architects and think tanks, with a particular focus on parasitical
architecture.

Parasitical architecture, despite its name, is not what our immediate

pre-conceptions envisions it to be. Instead of having a one beneficial
relationship, parasitical architecture aims to provide back to its local
surroundings through the means of additional housing units, using
whatever space is neccessary.

Given space is so restricted in this city, it would almost seem like a

complimentry medium to explore.

Think tank by Liam Young

15
pre c e de nt a nd con ce p t de ve lo pme n t

1. Green spaces create the most

interesting and beneficial interactive
spaces

2. Structures which utilise stylistic sowin g th e roots Con n ec tion s th e urba n s p i n e

contrast have the strongest
interractions

in vasive agen t pa rasitic a l ga in sym b iot i c g a i n

3. The city structure should be
providing a beneficial relationship back
to the users

rules setup

16
URBAN STRATEGY PROPOSAL | //SYMBIOSIS

Existing car park sites to be demolished and redeveloped into a new con- Winchester local bus garage to be demolised and redeveloped into an
nective hub for Winchesterw activites centre. This will help provoke the circulation around the proposed
Winchester council office/car-park to be redeveloped to accommodate
green-road
for the lack of veichle access to the site. Lower half of the structure to be
repurposed.

When looking at a proposal for an urban strategy for Winchester, it is clear

that any scheme would need to provide an interactive and intuitive expe-
rience to both the local population and passing travellers. An idea needed
to be put forward that could be beneficial without restricting the needs of
local buisness or damage the cultural heritage established within the city.

My proposal looks at creating an new urban city green road wrapping

from the train station, around the main high street and wrapping back
around some key open spaces and points of interest. In doing, this you are
relieving the city of its dense traffic and subsequent noise, sound and air
pollution. New inner-city Green boundary wrapping around the Winchester urban
core. Existing streets pedestrianised and planted with a tree canopy.
By injecting green spaces inbetween these pre-exisitng streets, I am hoping
to build a relationship between different communities and the street. By
inputting care and attention into the local vegetation and flora, these in
turn provide safe, natural and more dynamic environments for people to
interact with. SCALE A3//1:2500

17
initial conc e p t a nd mo de l l i n g

con ce pt mo de l : Org anic street and inorg a n i c u n i ts

18
19
Model s

20
21
phase I - C i t y c e nt r e P e de st r i a n i sat i o n

0 2 4 6 8 10 20 1:200

0 1 2 3 4 5 10 1:100

1:50
0 1 2 3 4 5

1:100
@ 1:1000
0 20 50 100

22
 P h as e I : Ag r i c u lt u r a l q ua r a nt ine

As an open project, we were given the oppurtunity to explore

the Town of Winchester, and some of the potential infrastructure
problems that could be solved through urban planning. Part
of my field analysis identified pollution as a major negative
contributer to the local ewwwnvironment. The town also has a
rapidly growing housing infrastructure. However it is difficult to
modify the historic existing infrastructure, so I chose to study
parasitical relationships in order to solve some of these issues.

This project proposes the benefits of having an inner-centre

without any cars, and how this new-found space feeds back into
the city. What if the city could be harvested to feed itself?

To solve this, planning would be split into two phases;

Phase I : Pedestrianisation of the city centre. This would have

the benefit of reducing noise and carbon emissions. In place
of the pre-existing roads, and Green-Highway would be
established as a ring-road of tress from which we can source
timber from.

Phase II : Parasitical Modules. From harvested timber, we

can build on-top of the existing infrastructure, complimenting
the harsh appearence with a beneficial relationship. Modules
can provide housing, collect water & energy, all whilst being
sustainable greenhouses.

CHANGELOG

- Colour profiles changed,

annotations. Attempts to improve
clarity and style of the the drawing

23
phase I - C i t y c e nt r e P e de st r i a n i sat i o n

Street Orchard Plots

-Inserting a responsive
organic facade
encompassing the city
centre

0 2 4 6 8 10 20 1:200 0 2 4 6 8 10 20 1:200

@ 1:100
0 1 2 3 4 5 10 1:100 0 1 2 3 4 5 10 1:100

24
 266 Trees Planted
1 Tree Absorbs 0.0217 Tonnes of Carbon Dioxide Per Year
Average Person = 10.9 Tonnes of Carbon Dioxide Per Year

public seating
266 Trees removes = 5.2 Tonnes of Carbon
- Inserting a system to
enjoy the organic Dioxide Per year
growth of the city. =0.5 people directly offsetted

Superhighway removes traffic from city centre

Pedestrianisation removes 4016 Tonnes of Carbon

Per year CHANGELOG

- Drawing style changed

- Parasite Representation removed.

=401 People directed offsetted The concept of growth is re-

addressed in later drawings.

25
 phase II - pa ras i t i ca l u n i ts

P h as e II : Pa r as i t i c a l R e side nce s

Phase Two of the Winchester urban redevelopment of an

urban residential and integration scheme. Looking back at the
the theory behind symbiotic and parasitical relationships, this
project aimed to adapt this into a coherent design.

The use of a symbiotic relationship can be used to set up a

localised system. The using of a modern style seen with the
likes of David Closes and Lebbeus Woods, shows that cultural
historic typology can co-exist and juxtapose
against a more radical typology.

By using the existing network established in Phase I, we can

setup a fuel system, where materials can be sourced and
converted into adaptable and compact units. These units
can then dispatch and serve several functions, including
residential units, water resource collection,
greenhouse growth and energy production.

6 8 10 20 1:200 0 2 4 6 8 10 20 1:200

3 4 5 10 1:100 0 1 2 3 4 5 10 1:100

1:50 1:50 CHANGELOG

2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 - Drawing style changed to feel more

experimental
1:50 Section -Fonts changed for clarity
-Improved Annotation

1:100 1:100
50 100 26 0 20 50 100
 INTERCHANGABLE
TIMBER PANELS

LIGHTWEIGHT
ALUMINIUM FRAME

ROD BEAM SLOT

STRUCTURE

The Cycle Axonometric

27
phase II - pa ras i t i ca l u n i ts co n ce p ts

28
Parasitical units were inspired mostly from the infamous water-
bear and flea typologies. Most Units are distinguishable from
a large abdomen, a concealed head, and multiple legs for
attachment and movement.

To replicate this concept as much as possible, units were

tested in Rhinocerous and Grasshopper. Some manually
created, some genetically coded

29
 s
ar
ye
25
rs
ye a
50

s
ar
ye
10
CHANGELOG

Added a more experimental map

showing the overall expansion and
progression of the parasitical units.

30
s

5 years

31
render s

CHANGELOG

- More atmospheric quality added

32
33
34
35
GENERATIVE
NESTS U302 - Social Housing

36
A THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIAL HOUSING

37
hare stoc k s i te v i si t

38
39
pre c e de nts

prec eden t 1 : S h a m poo P roj ec t

Urban Reed - Parametricism

A parametric project undetaken by the Architectural Asso-

ciation, this project aims to explore the research of organic
developments, and their adaptation into urban
infrastructure systems. The result is a fully
integrated urban development, that aims
to create a balance between an efficent
quota of housing units, and a level of
social connectivity on both the
ground and tower floors

40
pr e ce dent 2 : ro bin h ood g ardens

The-Street-In-The-Sky
Alison & Peter Smithson

One of the most infamous pieces of UK social housing

developments was the Robin Hood Gardens project, built by
Alison and Peter Smithson. They designed two distinct tower-
blocks encapsulating a central courtyard in an attempt to
create a more radically introverted community. On each floor,
corridors of skydecks would span the length of the building
and act as a street in the sky providing a level socialisation
and commerce on a vertical scale.

The idea however, did not come to full fruitition. There was
much disdain for the project by former owners, and the site
fell into disrepair and vandalism. This is one of many social
housing projects which had gained the distrust of the general
public.

41
01 CRAFTING THE ADAPTIVE NEST

42
 The site chose for Harestock, is situated between two
significant districts of Winchester, highlight a potential gap in
trade, travel and experience. In building a housing project for
this site, a tactical link between these disconnected districts
can be embraced and advantageous in creating exciting and
meaningful spaces.

43
system

COUNCIL
ACCESSIBILITY TOURISM
INTERACTION

LOWER ATTRACTIVENESS TRADE FROM

LONG-TERM CHEAP OF THE OUTSIDE
INVESTMENT INVESTMENT APARTMENTS SOURCES

LOWER DECREASING LOCAL

LONG-TERM ENERGY LOCALISED
ENVIRONMENTAL
INVESTMENT SOURCING ENERGY
OVERHEADS

EXTERNAL RELATIONSHIP INTERNAL RELATIONSHIP

44
 SUB-URBAN UNI-FICATION

SOCIAL

LOCAL INTEGRATION

THE FULFILLED RESIDENT

SOCIAL IMPROVEMENT

EFFICENT RESOURCE SELF-PRESERVATIONIST INDEPENDENT ENERGY RENEWABLE SOURCES OF REDUCED POLLUTION FROM INCREASED CARBON AND
MANAGEMENT CULTURE SOLAR AND WIND LOCAL TRAVEL NITROGEN ABSORBTION
PRODUCTION

EFFICENT USE OF
HIGHER DENSITY INDEPENDENT FOOD LOCALISED
APARTMENTS CONSUMPTION URBAN FARMING

ENVIRONMENTAL
ECONOMIC

45
 p3

p2

full wool string modelling

p1

p4
split the site into
equidistant intervals

p8

resolve geometry p5
based on environmental
parameters

p7

Manual omission for

residential groupings

WOOL STIRNG
SIMULATION
p6
46
SITE PLAN 1:1000

ground floor firstfloor fourth floor

47
 stores and equipm
storage

02 SPLICING THE LANDSCAPE/ CREATING RESPONSIVE ARCHITECTURE

CHANGELOG

- Overall plan annotated and given an

atmospheric quality

48
 tower 4

tower 3
tower 2

tower 1

mass plant room

+ Disposal

ment

tower 6

car Park

49
G r ass h o ppe r e x pe r imentation

To craft the generative nest, the site had to be coded and

developed in Rhinocerous and Grasshopper. By using
grasshopper, it is possible to define certain rules for
geometry, and then define instructions on how to translate
that geometry. This can then further be influenced by external
data. These are called attractors. Initial tests experimented
into how to induce a height extrusion, which can be
influenced by a defined path. The path in this instance, is
the attractor, and the surrounding geometry reacts to its
presence (As shown in image 1)

In doing this, we can then define more advanced paramaters

for geometry design. As shown in figure 2, we can define
the shape of the solid, rotate it around an axis towards an
external attractor, then divide the solid to form different
storeys

Image 1 : Attractor test

50
 Image 2 : Attractor & Tower geometry test

51
r e s po nsi ve bui l d i n g code

52
53
 ext r u d i n g t h e tower s to r eac t to
fo r min g the base for the colony
s u n li g h t

CHANGELOG

-Diagrams given basic context

54
 st r u c t u r a l s ystem s a n d li fe
ge nerationg floors
s u p por t

55
 Buildings are parametrically angled towards the sun, in an
attempt to capture the most amount of solar radiation. In doing
01 this, we can obtain the most efficent amount of renewable
solar energy through photovoltaics embeded into the
62
facade of the building.
Decidicous trees will protect the ground level from high-force
02 winds

Building towers are mostly made out of concrete, and therefore

have a high thermal mass. This means the amont of heat
03 absorbed and released is greater, and minimises the need for
extensive central heating systems. This is the buildings form of
passive heating.

04
The presence of a borehole suggests a high water table within
the chalk and clay geology of the site. This can be used to run
15
central heating through as a passive cooling system.
Building towers are angled, so that they are streamlined
against the prevailing winds. The more fluid and aerodynamic
05 nature of the building, allows incoming abnormal winds to
deflect around the building, without producing unwanted stack
effects.

56
 Perforations in the base of the building allow the collection of
high-speed wind through tubes. In using a state of the art piezo-
06 wind generator, this can be used as an active wind energy
renewable source, as well as a backup to our active solar
radiation source.

Building site is mostly permeable land, to allow for efficent

07 surface runoff and drainage in wetter periods.

Decidicous trees will provide exposed courtyard spaces with

08 solar shading during the summer months

Offcuts from the trees can be used as a form of biomass, as

another alternative energy production. This also reduces the
09 amount of waste produced from the site.

Facades of the building will be used as a form of vertical

gardening. This would allow for carbon dioxide absorbtion and
10 sustainable food production within the project site.

57
e nvironme nta l a nalys i s

Jan : Max 40.22 Feb : Max 47.05 Mar : Max 68.78

Apr : Max 98.87 May : Max 136.10 Jun : Max 131.62

l a dy b u g so l ar r ad iation analysis

58
Jul : Max 139.18 Aug : Max 120.54 Sep : Max 88.64

Oct : Max 71.32 Nov : Max 43.06 Dec : Max 28.04

59
environme nta l a n a lys i s

auto de sk f lowde sig n wind tunnel analysis

60
 The use of ladybug tools within IES and Autodesks flowdesign
software, give the ability to see the environmental adavantages
to the design.

The building recieves a high solar yield from its direct angle into
the sun. This can be used as a means to provide direct solar
energy production through the use of photovoltaic panels

Using flowdesign, we can also compare the differences

between a standard tower, and a streamlined design. In a
casual wind, the regular tower has a greater pressure exerted
over a larger area, potentially causing greater structural
considerations. Furthermore, the regular tower causes a level
of potentially dangerous buffeting it. The parametric tower is
streamlined against this wind, and is more easily able to deflect
these winds.

61
initial de ve lopme n t r e n de r s

62
63
s pati a l analysis

g l a room standard minimums

1 Bed | 1 Pe rs on
1 Bed | 2 Peopl e
2 Bed | 3 People
2 Bed | 4 People

Kitchen living room Bathroom and w/c single bedroom Double Bedroom

64
s pati a l de ve lo pme n t

h ousi n g unit i n terior arrang ements

cel l 1
cell 2
cell 3

nucleus
cell structure room arrangement layout mitochondrian final plan
(Core)

65
ROOM RE-ARRANGEMENTS

Post review public & Private

final review plan
circulation analysis analysis

66
 BATHROM

OFFICE/STORAGE

LOBBY

mASTER BEDROOM

kITCHEN

LIVING ROOM

67
 W1.06

DRAWINGS

W
M
W1.07

1.03 1.04

CY
L
D1.04

C D
1.06
B E D1.05

TV
A F 1.08
1.02
W1.04 1.01 LOBBY
1.01
W1.08 1.02 LIVING ROOM

W1.05 D1.03 1.03 KITCHEN

1.05
1.04 MASTER BEDROOM

T D1.01 1.05 GUEST BEDROOM

W1.03 G
1.04
1.06 BATHROOM
1.01
1.07 W/C (SEPERATE)

1.08 STORAGE
1.06
1.09 CORE STAIRCASE
S H 1.09
D1.02 1.10 LIFT
TV

1.11 SHARED OUTDOOR SPACE

R 1.02 I UP
W.XX WINDOW IDENT
WM W1.01 D1.10
D.XX DOOR IDENT
1.03

Q D1.09
J
W1.02 No DATE AMMENDMENT NAME
CYL
1.10
P
K

O
L W1.09

N M
1.11

1.02

TV

D1.07 BYRON ARCHITECTURE STUDIOS

W1.10
CYL
D1.06 1.01
1.06 PROJECT GENERATIVE NESTS PROJECT (TOWER 3)

CLIENT WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL

1.03
1.07
DRAWING TITLE GROUND FLOOR PLAN
D1.08

SCALE 1:200 @ A3
1.04 WM

W1.11 REFERENCE (L)01

0 2 4 6 8 10 20 1:200 0 2 4 6 8 10 20 1:200
N

04/03/2017 D.B K.B

@ 1:100 DATE DRAWN CHECKED
0 1 2 3 4 5 10 1:100 0 1 2 3 4 5 10 1:100
68
 A B C D E F G H I J K L

A-A

7
1.0
W
1

.05
D1
M
2

8
W

1.0
6
1.0

.04

W
W

D1
3

.03
D1
TV

4
5
1.0
W

0
5

1.1
W
.10
D1

L
CY
6

.07
D1
No DATE AMMENDMENT NAME

M
1.0

W
W

TV

.08
D1
UP
.01

7
D1
4
1.0
W

.09
D1

.06
D1
1
1.0
W

8
TV

1
1.1
BYRON ARCHITECTURE STUDIOS

W
.02

9
D1

PROJECT GENERATIVE NESTS PROJECT (TOWER 3)

3

CLIENT WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL

1.0
W

L
CY

DRAWING TITLE WAFFLE SLAB GRID SYSTEM

0 2 4 6 8 10 20 1:2
M
W

10 SCALE 1:200 @ A3

REFERENCE (A)04
2
1.0
W

0 1 2 3 4 5 10 1:1
04/03/2017 D.B
@ 1:100
K.B
N

DATE DRAWN CHECKED

69
1:5
 7
W1.0

6
W1.0

DRAWINGS

WM
1.04

1.03 D1.0
4

CYL
5
D1.0

1.06

1.08
8
W1.0

TV
1.01
1.02
3 1.01 LOBBY
D1.0
1.02 LIVING ROOM
D E
1.03 KITCHEN
C F W 1.05 1.04 MASTER BEDROOM

1.05 GUEST BEDROOM

B 1.06 BATHROOM

4 1.07 W/C (SEPERATE)

W1.0

G 1.08 STORAGE
A
D1.0
1 1.09 CORE STAIRCASE
1.05 1.10 LIFT
1.01 1.11 SHARED OUTDOOR SPACE

H W.XX WINDOW IDENT

1.04
D.XX DOOR IDENT
3
W1.0
T 1.06 I
WM
TV

2 1.02 W1.0
1 No DATE AMMENDMENT NAME
D1.0

J
9
S W1.0
0
WM 1.03 W1.1
K
R 1.02 CYL
7
D1.0
CYL

TV
2
W1.0
1.11 1.03
Q 1.06

L 1.01
1.07
P D1.0
6
D1.0
8 BYRON ARCHITECTURE STUDIOS
M WM
O PROJECT GENERATIVE NESTS PROJECT (TOWER 3)
N TV

1.04 CLIENT WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL

DRAWING TITLE FIRST FLOOR PLAN

0 2 4 6 8 10 20 1:20
1
W1.1
SCALE 1:200 @ A3

REFERENCE (L)02

0 1 2 3 4 5 10 1:1
04/03/2017 D.B
@ 1:100
K.B
DATE DRAWN CHECKED

70
1:50
 +3500 FFL

A B

+24500 FFL

A01
DETAIL
+21000 FFL

A02
DETAIL

+17500 FFL

+14000 FFL

No DATE AMMENDMENT NAME

+10500 FFL

+7000 FFL

BYRON ARCHITECTURE STUDIOS

PROJECT GENERATIVE NESTS PROJECT (TOWER 3)

CLIENT WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL

+3500 FFL DRAWING TITLE SECTION A-A

SCALE 1:200 @ A3

REFERENCE (L)03

0 2 4 6 8 10 20 1:2
04/03/2017 D.B
@ 1:200
K.B
+0000 FFL
DATE DRAWN CHECKED

0 1 2 3 4 5 10 1:
71
 +21000 FFL

No DATE AMMENDMENT NAME

1 6/5/17 ROOFING REPLACED WITH REINFORCED

CONCRETE

+17500 FFL
BYRON ARCHITECTURE STUDIOS

PROJECT GENERATIVE NESTS PROJECT (TOWER 3)

CLIENT WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL

DRAWING TITLE DETAIL SECTION 1:20

SCALE 1:20 @ A3

REFERENCE (A)01

04/03/2017 D.B K.B

@ 1:20
DATE DRAWN CHECKED

72
 1 2 34 5 6

1. In-Situ Concrete 50mm E10

2. Polystyrene Board Insulation 50mm E10
3. Breather Membrane J40
4. In-Situ Concrete Formwork 450mm E10
5. Rebar Wire Re-Inforcement 20mm E30
6. Rib Reinforcement 20mm E30
7. PVC Dropped Ceiling Panels K40
9 8. 90 ACA Angle Clip K40
9. Universal Beam 457x191 G10
10. Thenolic Block 40mm K21
11. Thenolic Block 15mm12. K21
12. Aluminium Composite Window Frame P21
13. Air Seal L10
14. Warm Edge Spacers L10
15 Photovoltaic Panelling L10

10

No DATE AMMENDMENT NAME

11
7 8 13
12
14
15

BYRON ARCHITECTURE STUDIOS

PROJECT GENERATIVE NESTS PROJECT (TOWER 3)

CLIENT WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL

DRAWING TITLE DETAIL SECTION 1:5

SCALE 1:5 @ A3

REFERENCE (A)01

04/03/2017 D.B K.B

@ 1:5
DATE DRAWN CHECKED

73
po p u late d se ct i o n

74
75
76
77
78
79