Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Usually, the equation established on the out-observations assumption on the internal structure of particles by physicists
only characterizes those of coherent behaviors of all parts in was mathematically verified by extending Banach spaces to
a particle P. For example, a water molecule H2 O obeys the
extended Banach spaces on topological graphs G in [12]:
Schrodinger equation (1.3), we assume its Hydrogen atom H
Let (V ; +, ) be a Banach space over a field F and G a
and oxygen atom O also obey the Schrodinger equation (1.3) strong-connected topological graph with vertex set V and arc
as a matter of course. However, the divisibility of matter ini- L
set X. A vector labeling G on G is a 11 mapping L : G
tiates human beings to search elementary constituting cells
of matter, i.e. elementary particles such as those of quarks, V such that L : (u, v) L(u, v) V for (u, v) X G and
leptons with interaction quanta including photons and other it is a G-flow if it holds with
particles of mediated interactions, also with those of their an- X
tiparticles at present ([14]), and unmatters between a matter L (u, v) = L (v, u) and L (vu ) = 0
and its antimatter which is partially consisted of matter but uNG (v)
others antimatter ([8-19]). For example, a baryon is predomi-
nantly formed from three quarks, and a meson is mainly com- for (u, v) X G , v V(G), where 0 is the zero-vector in
posed of a quark and an antiquark in the models of Sakata, V.
or Gell-Mann and Neeman on hadron and meson, such as
L L1 L2
For G-flows G , G , G on a topological graph G and
those shown in Fig. 2, where, qni {u, d, c, s,o t, b} denotes a L1 L2 L
F a scalar, it is clear that G + G and G are also
quark for i = 1, 2, 3 and q2 u, d, c, s, t, b , an antiquark.
G-flows, which implies that all G-flows on G form a linear
But a free quark was never found in experiments. We can
space over F with unit O under operations + and , denoted
not even conclude the Schrodinger equation (1.3) is the right
V
equation (1.2) for quarks because it is established on an inde- by G , where O is such a G-flow with vector 0 on (u, v) for
V
pendent particle, can not be divided again in mathematics. (u, v) X G . Then, it was shown that G is a Banach
space, and furthermore a Hilbert space if introduce
.. q1
X
..
L
.. G
= kL(u, v)k ,
.. q1 ................................. q2 !
............... (u,v)X G
. .....
..... ..... L
q2 ..... . q3
1 L2 X
G ,G = hL1 (u, v), L2 (u, v)i
Baryon Meson !
(u,v)X G
Fig. 2
L L1 L2
V
for G , G , G G , where kL(u, v)k is the norm of
L(u, v) and h, i the inner product in V if it is an inner space.
Then, why is it believed without a shadow of doubt that The following result generalizes the representation theorem
the dynamical equations of elementary particles such as those of Frechet and Riesz on linear continuous functionals on
G-
of quarks, leptons with interaction quanta are (1.3) in phys- flow space V
G , which enables us to find G-flow solutions on
ics? It is because that all our observations come from a macro linear equations (1.2).
viewpoint, the human beings, not the particle itself, which
V
rationally leads to H. Everetts multiverse interpretation on Theorem 2.1([12]) Let T : G C be a linear continuous
the superposition by letting parallel equations for the wave functional. Then there is a unique bL
V
G G such that
functions (t, x) on positions of a particle in 1957 ([2]). We
only hold coherent behaviors of elementary particles, such as L * L bL +
those of quarks, leptons with interaction quanta and their an- T G = G ,G
tiparticles by (1.3), not the individual, and it is only an equa-
tion on those of particles viewed abstractly to be a geomet-
L V
for G G .
rical point or an independent field from a macroscopic point,
which leads physicists to assume the internal structures me- For non-linear equations (1.2), we can also get G-flow
chanically for hold the behaviors of particles such as those solutions on them if G can be decomposed into circuits.
shown in Fig. 2 on hadrons. However, such an assumption Theorem 2.2([12]) If the topological graph G is strong-
is a little ambiguous in logic, i.e. we can not even conclude connected with circuit decomposition
which is the point or the independent field, the hadron or its
[
l
subparticle, the quark.
G= Ci
In fact, a point is non-divisible in geometry. Even so, the i=1
such that L(uv ) = Li (x) for (u, v) X C i , 1 i l and the Certainly, each of these observing views a particle in P to
Cauchy problem be an independent particle, which enables us to establish the
( dynamic equation (1.2) by Euler-Lagrange equation (2.3) for
Fi x, u, u x1 , , u xn , u x1 x2 , = 0 Pi , 1 i m, respectively, and then we can apply the system
u|x0 = Li (x) of differential equations
3 In-observations for characterizing particle P in field theory, where the ith equ-
ation is the dynamic equation of particle Pi with initial data
An in-observation observes on the internal behaviors of a par- q0 , q 0 or 0 .
ticle, particularly, a composed particle P. Let P be composed We discuss the solvability of systems (3.1) and (3.2). Let
by particles P1 , P2 , , Pm . Different from out-observation
(
from a macro viewing, in-observation requires the observer 3 L1 d L1
holding the respective behaviors of particles P1 , P2 , , Pm in S qi = (x , y
i i i, z )(q i , t) R qi dt q i = 0,
P, for instance an observer enters a water molecule H2 O re- qi (t0 ) = q0 , q i (t0 ) = q 0 }
ceiving information on the Hydrogen or Oxygen atoms H, O.
For such an observation, there are 2 observing ways: for integers 1 i m. Then, the system (3.1) of equations is
(1) there is an apparatus such that an observer can simul- solvable if and only if
taneously observe behaviors of particles P1 , P2 , , Pm , i.e.
P1 , P2 , , Pm can be observed independently as particles at \
m
AO = AH1 = AH2 , EO = E H1 = E H2 and pO = pH1 = pH2 , exists for all t 0 and with the inequality
a contradiction. X X
Notice that each equation in systems (3.1) and (3.2) is u0 [v] u[v] <
solvable but the system itself is non-solvable in general, and L0 L
vV(G [P]) vV(G [P])
holds, denoted by G L [P] G L0 [P]. Furthermore, if there 4.1 States of particles are multiverse
exists a number v > 0 for v V(G L0 [P]) such that every A particle P understood by formula (1.1) is in fact a multi-
0
G L [P]-solution with verse consisting of known characters 1 , 2 , , n and un-
0 [v]
known characters k , k 1, i.e. different characters charac-
u 0 u[v] 0 < v , v V(G L0 [P]) terize different states of particle P. This fact also implies that
the multiverse exist everywhere if we understand a particle P
satisfies with in-observation, not only those levels of I IV of Max
Tegmark in [24]. In fact, the infinite divisibility of a matter
X X M in philosophy alludes nothing else but a multiverse ob-
lim 0
u [v]
u = 0,
[v]
t served on M by its individual submatters. Thus, the nature of
vV(GL0 [P]) vV(G L [P])
a particle P is multiple in front of human beings, with unity
character appeared only in specified situations.
then the G L [P]-solution is called asymptotically stable, de-
noted by G L [P] G L0 [P]. Similarly, the energy integral of 4.2 Reality only characterized by non-compatible sys-
L
G -solution is determined by tem
shown in [10] and have to extend mathematical systems on 11. Linfan Mao. Cauchy problem on non-solvable system of first order par-
graph G L [F ] ([12]) for holding the reality of F . tial differential equations with applications. Methods and Applications
of Analysis, 2015, v. 22 (2), 171200.
Notice that there is a conjecture for developing mathe-
matics in [4] called CC conjecture which claims that any 12. Linfan Mao. Extended Banach G-flow spaces on differential equations
with applications. Electronic J.Mathematical Analysis and Applica-
mathematical science can be reconstructed from or turned tions, 2015, v. 3 (2), 5991.
into combinatorization. Such a conjecture is in fact a com-
13. Linfan Mao. A new understanding of particles by G-flow interpretation
binatorial notion for developing mathematics on topological of differential equation, Progress in Physics, 2015, v. 11, 3950.
graphs, i.e. finds the combinatorial structure to reconstruct or 14. Nambu Y. Quarks: Frontiers in Elementary Particle Physics. World Sci-
generalize classical mathematics, or combines different math- entific Publishing, 1985.
ematical sciences and establishes a new enveloping theory on 15. Quang Ho-Kim and Pham Xuan Yem. Elementary Particles and Their
topological graphs for hold the reality of things F . Interactions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1998.
16. Reid T. An inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common
5 Conclusion sense. in Brookes D., ed., Edinburgh University Press, 1997.
17. Smarandache F. Paradoxist Geometry. State Archives from Valcea, Rm.
Reality of a thing is hold on observation with level depen- Valcea, Romania, 1969, and in Paradoxist Mathematics. Collected Pa-
dent on the observer standing out or in that thing, particu- pers (Vol. II). Kishinev University Press, Kishinev, 1997, pp. 528.
larly, a particle classified to out- or in-observation, or paral- 18. Smarandache F. A new form of matter unmatter, composed of parti-
lel observing from a macro or micro view and characterized cles and anti-particles. Progress in Physics, 2005, v 1, 911.
by solvable or non-solvable differential equations, consistent 19. Smarandache F. and Rabounski D. Unmatter entities inside nuclei, pre-
with the universality principle of contradiction in philosophy. dicted by the Brightsen nucleon cluster model. Progress in Physics,
2006, v. 2, 1418.
For holding on the reality of things, the out-observation is
20. Tegmark M. Parallel universes. in Barrow J. D., Davies P. C. W. and
basic but the in-observation is cardinal. Correspondingly, the
Harper C. L., eds. Science and Ultimate Reality: From Quantum to
solvable equation is individual but the non-solvable equations Cosmos. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
are universal. Accompanying with the establishment of com-
patible systems, we are also needed to characterize those of
contradictory systems, particularly, non-solvable differential
equations on particles and establish mathematics on topolog-
ical graphs, i.e. mathematical combinatorics, and only which
is the appropriate way for understanding the nature because
all things are in contradiction.
Submitted on June 18, 2015 / Accepted on June 20, 2015
References
1. Abraham R. and Marsden J. E. Foundation of Mechanics, 2nd ed.
Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1978.
2. Everett H. Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics.
Rev.Mod.Phys., 1957, v. 29, 454462.
3. Lu J. C. Fangfo Analyzing LAO ZHI Explaining TAO TEH KING by
TAI JI (in Chinese). Tuan Jie Publisher, Beijing, 2004.
4. Linfan Mao. Combinatorial speculation and combinatorial conjecture
for mathematics. International J.Math. Combin., 2007, v. 1 (1), 119.
5. Linfan Mao. Combinatorial Geometry with Applications to Field The-
ory. The Education Publisher Inc., USA, 2011.
6. Linfan Mao. Combinatorial fields an introduction. International J.
Math.Combin., 2009, v. 3, 122.
7. Linfan Mao. Global stability of non-solvable ordinary differential equa-
tions with applications. International J.Math. Combin., 2013, v. 1, 1
37.
8. Linfan Mao. Non-solvable equation systems with graphs embedded in
Rn . in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Smaran-
dache Multispace and Multistructure, The Education Publisher Inc.,
July 2013.
9. Linfan Mao. Geometry on G L -systems of homogenous polynomials.
International J.Contemp. Math. Sciences, 2014, v. 9 (6), 287308.
10. Linfan Mao. Mathematics on non-mathematics A combinatorial con-
tribution. International J.Math. Combin., 2014, v. 3, 134.