Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
com/4-motor-designs-identified-in-nema-mg1
Its
all
4 Motor Designs Identified In NEMA MG1 (on photo: ABB's three-phase asynchronous electric motors via DirectIndustry.com)
about performance
Performance requirements for various types of induction motors for use on standard sinewave power supplies
are identified in NEMA MG1. Some of these types of motors are suitable for use in variable speed applications,
dependent on the type of application.
Performance requirements are also identified for motors for specific use invariable speed applications.
The purpose of this section is to provide guidance on the selection of one or more of the types of motors identified
in NEMA MG1 that may be appropriate for the particular variable speed application under consideration. See
Figure 1.
The turning force which a motor develops is known as torque. The amount of torque necessary to start a load
(starting torque) is usually different from the torque required to keep the load moving ( full load torque).
Loads which have a high breakaway friction or that require extra torque for acceleration, should have a motor
specified to have high starting torque.
NEMA MG1 does not impose any limits on the magnitude of the locked-rotor current on Design A motors, other
than that the locked-rotor current is greater than the upper limit for Design B motors.
They are usually used in situations where higher locked-rotor current is used for the purpose of obtaining
higher running efficiency and higher breakdown torque.
Design B motors are applied in variable torque, constant torque and constant horsepower applications.
Adjustable frequency control algorithms are generally optimized to the speed-torque-current characteristics of
Design B motors. They exhibit good efficiency and low slip,and are suitable for across-the-line starting in bypass
mode.
Design B motors with very low slip may also exhibit instability under lightly loaded conditions.
Since a Design B motor operated from an adjustable frequency control can provide the same breakaway torque
as a Design C motor operated from a control, it is usually preferred because of its industry-standard availability
and higher running efficiency. Also, since an adjustable frequency control driven motor normally operates at
speeds above the breakdown speed, the high locked-rotor and pull-up torque of a Design C motor serves no
benefit in most adjustable speed drive applications.
Because Design C motors usually achieve high starting torque with a double or pseudo-double cage rotor
slot, they may exhibit higher rotor losses if the control output current waveform has significant low order harmonic
content.
This can result in additional heating in Design C motors over that in Design B and a corresponding greater
decrease in system efficiency. Design B motors may not be suitable for bypass operation in an application that
normally requires use of a Design C motor for fixed frequency application.
Design D motors were developed specifically for high impact, high starting torque, or high inertia loads.
They exhibit very high locked-rotor torque but suffer in running efficiency due to their high slip characteristic. By
employing negative slip compensation with an adjustable frequency control, a Design A, B or C motor can be
made to emulate the speed-torque characteristic of a Design D motor while providing higher running
efficiency.
Design A, B, or C motors cannot be used for bypass operation on an application that normally requires a Design D
motor for fixed frequency application.
References
1. NEMA Standards Publication Application Guide for AC Adjustable Speed Drive Systems
2. BALDOR (A member of the ABB Group) Specifier Guide