Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Teresa Soto, Marta Lozano, Jernima Vicente-Soler, Jos Cansado & Mariano Gacto
Departamento de Gentica y Microbiologa, Facultad de Biologa, Universidad de Murcia, Campus Universitario de Espinardo,
30100 Murcia, Spain.
Resumen
Abstract
containing appropriate solid culture media (see other routine procedures for identification of bac-
below). The impact rate was equivalent to 11 teria included culture on Kligler iron-agar (slants),
m/sec to ensure efficient capture of particles abo- Gram staining, oxidase test with Kovacs reagent,
ve 1 m and no loss of viability due to impact and catalase reaction. In some cases the bacterial
stress (Meier & Zingre 2000). Before each sam- colonies that developed were subjected to micro-
pling session, the head of the air sampler was pro- scope examination and to biochemical analysis
perly sterilized as a control. In all cases, the sam- with API Biomerieux strips. Fungal isolates were
ples were obtained between 16:00 p.m. and 19:00 microscope examined in fresh or lactophenol
p.m. Duplicated samples were taken twice a blue-stained preparations. Bacterial and fungal
month during an entire year (October 2007-Sep- identification was carried out according to general
tember 2008) and the monthly results averaged. procedures contained in stablished mannuals
Microbial concentration for each temporal series (Buchanan & Gibbons, 1975; Samson & Van
was expressed as mean values of colony-forming Reenen-Hoekstra 1988; Germain & Summerbell
units (CFU) per m3 of air analyzed. In parallel, a 1996; Prescott et al. 2004).
correlation was established between the values
found and the temperature and relative humidity Results
recorded by the Metereological Service of the
University of Murcia. Microbial concentration as a function of the
sampling site
Culture media
The results obtained for bacteria and fungi in the
All media employed in this study were supplied various areas analyzed during our study are sum-
by VWR International Eurolab S.L. Non-selective marized in table 2. No extreme variations were
media were used for total bacteria counting (nu- recorded when the different sampling sites were
trient agar) and for bacterial growth examination compared. In all cases the presence of airborne
(agar LB, agar-chocolate). Agar-MacConkey was fungi outnumbered the bacteria, and the total vi-
employed as selective medium for isolation and able microorganisms (bacteria + fungi) accounted
identificaction of enterobacteria of the coliform for a maximum of 7,0 x 102 and a minimum of 3,3
group. Haemolytic activity was assayed on Co- x 102, which is within the usual range of airborne
lumbia blood-agar medium. Isolated colonies of microbial contamination (Atlas & Bartha 2002).
bacteria were also cultured on Hugh-Leifson dif- The data also reveal that, on the average, bacteria
ferential medium to assess for fermentative or oxi- represent only 27% of the suspended microflora in
dative properties and motility. In addition, Legio- Murcia as compared to fungi (73%).
nella BCYE/GVPC-agar was used to evaluate the Consistently, the site no. 1.1 (Salitre Garden-
presence of the causative agent of legionnairesdi- Lagoon) was the place showing the higher number
sease. Estimation of airborne fungi was carried of total CFU/m3. This recreational place shows a
out by growth on Sabouraud-agar medium supple- large inflow of people together with a wide vari-
mented with chloramphenicol. The respective cul- ety of plants, birds (mostly pigeons) and pets
ture media were properly sterilized by autoclaving (dogs). On the contrary, the site no. 9 (Cathedral
and spread into sterilized petri dishes which were Square), which is a restricted pedestrian area, reg-
adjusted to the air sampler when required. Sam- istered the lowest counts for both bacteria and
pled plates were incubated at 35-37C for 48 h in fungi. The highest bacterial concentration in the
the case of bacterial analysis and at 28-29C for air was detected in place no. 5 (La Fama Avenue),
72 h in the case of fungal sampling. coincident with an urban zone of low sanitary
general conditions (Table 2).
Other methods
After the incubation period, the plates were exam-
Bacterial diversity
ined for CFU counting. Since in all cases 100
liters of air were sampled, the number of viable The most frequent types of colony morphologies
counts obtained in each plate was multiplied by were investigated further in each sampled plate
10 to reflect the microbial content in 1 m3 of cap- for microbial identification. By staining proce-
tured air. In addition to microscope observations, dures, 77% of the bacterial colonies examined
10 T. Soto et al. Anales de Biologa 31, 2009
Area no. Bacteria (CFU/m3) x102 Fungi (CFU/m3) x102 Total (CFU/m3) x102
1.1 1,37 5,67 7,04
1.2 1,02 4,3 5,32
2 1,64 3,63 5,27
3 1,94 3,91 5,85
4 1,25 3,15 4,4
5 2,45 3,5 5,95
6 1 4,32 5,32
7 1,35 2,71 4,06
8 1,77 5 6,77
9 0,6 2,63 3,23
Total average: 1,44 3,88 5,32
Tabla 2. Concentracin media de microorganismos en el aire en las diferentes zonas estudiadas (los valores mximos y mnimos de cada serie
se indican en negrita)
Table 2. Average aerial microbial concentration in the different zones studied (maximal and minimal values in each series are in bold).
contained Gram-positive cells while 23% were sides a number of forms less frequently isolated
composed of Gram-negative cells. When cell mor- that were uncharacterized. Cladosporium (69%)
phology was examined, the incidence of coccoid was the air contaminant most usually detected and
cells (65%) predominated over those with bacilar this result is coincident with other reported studies
shape (35%). Likely, these frequencies are due to on the fungal airborne microflore in open air envi-
the differential cell wall structure (with a wider ronments (Oliveira et al. 2005; Flores-Tena et al.
layer of peptidoglycan in Gram-positive cells) and 2007). Also present in the sampled air were found
to the lower surface/volumen ratio showed by species of Alternaria (14%), Aspergillus (11%)
cocci as compared to bacilli. and Penicillium (6%).
Biochemical characterization of the isolates
was also performed to identify the examined bac- Relative
Genera
teria till the genus level. The results are summa- Percentage
rized in table 3. Species of Staphyloccocus repre- Staphylococcus 47
Acinetobacter 10
sented almost one half of the aireal bacterial pop- Bacillus 9
ulation, followed far away by species of Acineto- Streptococcus 8
bacter, spore-formig Bacillus, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium 8
Corynebacterium and Pseudomonas. Enterobacte- Pseudomonas 7
Yersinia 3
ria were occasionally present, as well as Listeria, Proteus 3
Lactobacillus and Haemophilus. Listeria 2
By using the selective and especific culture Lactobacillus 2
Haemophilus 1
medium Legionella BCYE/GVPC-agar we were
also able to detect Legionella in the sampling ar- Table 3.- Frequencies of most common bacterial isolates (October
2007-September 2008)
eas no. 4 (Gran Via) and no. 8 (Ronda de
Tabla 3.- Frecuencia relativa de bacterias aisladas (Octubre 2007-
Levante), although only during July 2008. No Septiembre 2008)
serotyping of the isolated strains was additionally
performed.
Seasonal variation of microbial
Fungal diversity contaminants
In our study, almost all airborne fungi isolated The mean values of seasonal isolations obtained
grew in filamentous forms and gave rise to char- throughout an entire year in each of the 10 areas
acteristic colonies on Sabouraud plus chloram- sampled were computed to establish the data
phenicol solid medium. Colony morphology, cou- shown in figures 1 and 2. The microbial load due
pled to microscope analyses of both hyphae and to bacteria was higher during October and de-
spores, allowed to establish the relative abundance creased in a gradual fashion until January, when a
of the more common genera detected. Four genera small increase was detected, to decrease again
were essentially predominant among fungi, be- thereafter. The lowest level of bacterial contami-
Anales de Biologa 31, 2009 Aerial microbial content in Murcia 11
500
400
CFU/m3
300
200
100
il
ay
ly
y
t
r
r
er
ne
us
be
be
be
pr
ar
c
ar
Ju
ob
M
ar
Ju
nu
ru
ug
em
m
em
M
ct
te
Ja
A
O
Fe
p
No
De
Se
Month
Figura 1. Variacin estacional de la concentracin de bacterias en el aire de las zonas muestreadas durante el perodo de un ao.
Figure 1. Seasonal distribution of bacterial concentration into the air of the sampled areas during one year period.
1200
1000
CFU/m3
800
600
400
200
0
y
il
ay
ly
t
ch
r
r
r
ne
us
be
be
be
be
pr
ar
ar
Ju
M
ar
Ju
nu
ru
ug
o
em
em
m
M
ct
te
Ja
A
O
Fe
p
No
De
Month Se
Figura 2. Variacin estacional de la concentracin de hongos en el aire de las zonas muestreadas durante el perodo de un ao.
Figure 2. Seasonal distribution of fungal concentration into the air of the sampled areas during one year period.
100
90
Hum idity (%)
80
Tem pe rature (C)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
y
il
ly
ay
ch
t
r
r
er
r
ne
us
be
be
be
ar
ar
pr
Ju
ob
M
ar
Ju
nu
ru
ug
em
em
m
M
ct
b
Ja
te
A
O
Fe
p
No
De
Month
Se
Figura 3. Temperatura y humedad relativa del aire registrada durante el perodo de muestreo.
Figure 3. Air temperature and relative humidity recorded during the sampling period.
12 T. Soto et al. Anales de Biologa 31, 2009
nation was found in the period between March the elements involved. Hence, data on airborne
and September (Fig. 1). However, the temporal contamination may be influenced by multiple
distribution of the fungal microbiota appears to variables that are continuously changing and, con-
follow a different pattern (Fig. 2). In close relation sequently, they offer an informative flash rather
to humidity and temperature values (Fig. 3) fungal than to describe a steady situation. However, in
concentration increased rather steadily during au- spite of the restrictions of this type of studies, our
tumn, peaked during February and less dramati- results clearly make possible to draw a contamina-
cally again in June, while the rest of the year tion profile with general quantitative and qualita-
showed a level below 4 x 102 CFU/m3. The lowest tive conclusions.
value for fungi was recorded in July (coincident Common levels of cultivable microorganisms
with the minimal value for bacteria). Notably, this from air vary from 10 to 104 CFU/m3 (Atlas &
month was unusually warm, with daytime temper- Bartha 2002). Our data indicate the existence of a
atures often surpassing 40C (Fig. 3). significant level of microbial contamination in the
urban air of Murcia which is, nevertheless, below
Discussion or within the normal range of pollution found in
similar studies performed on the outdoor air of
No analyses on the microbiological load of the ur- other cities (Di Giorgio et al. 1996, Shaffer &
ban air in the city of Murcia have been published Lighthart 1997, Mahdy & El-Sehrawi 1997,
prior to this work. In the present study we present Lighthart 2000, Zhu et al. 2003, Nava et al. 2004,
a series of preliminary data related to such topic. Oliveira et al. 2005). The results pointing that vi-
The methods used to collect microorganisms in able fungal counts generally exceeded the bacte-
the atmosphere may include impaction, impinge- rial airborne concentration are in agreement with
ment, filtration or gravity deposition (Griffin the fact that fungal spores are generally well
2007). Gravity deposition involves exposure of adapted to survival in the absence of available wa-
nutrient agar plates to open-air environments for ter and nutrients in the atmosphere (Ingold 1971).
some periods of time. However, this simple and Likewise, the relative abundance of Gram-posi-
inexpensive protocol has been shown unaccept- tive bacterial cells with cocoid appearance versus
able in comparison to volumetric assays (Gregory bacilar shape might be explained on the bases of
1973). Impingement is also used in aeromicrobiol- their structural cell wall composition, which re-
ogy but requires the use of liquid media that often sults in more global resistance to hostile condi-
makes resulting counts less reliable (Terzieva et tions of the aerial environment, such as disseca-
al. 1996). On the other hand, filtration methods, tion or sun radiation. Taking into account our
based on the trapping of microorganisms larger daily intake of air (more than 10.000 liters) and
than the pore size on a filter that is later cultured, that a global mean value of 532 microorganisms
show the serious drawback of microbial dessica- per m3 was obtained as the average value from the
tion due to the high flow rate needed and the time overall data, this study reveals that one citizen of
required prior to culture. Consequently, we se- Murcia may inhale a total estimate of no less than
lected an impaction method which enables air to about 5 x 103 microorganisms each day from the
move directly over the surface of petri dishes con- outdoor air.
taining selective and non-selective agar media. In The highest total microbial density corre-
the procedure used, air flow can be controlled for sponded to a gardened area with relatively intense
volume and evenly distributed over the surface of human and animal activities while the minor mi-
culture media. Our detection system is easy to use crobial pollution was found near the Cathedral
due to its portability, shows relative low cost, and building. Several potential pathogens, like
more importantly, allows the assessment of cul- Staphylococcus and other common Gram-positive
tivable populations of bacteria and fungi per a bacteria, were detected in several areas of the
known volume of air. Murcia air. The occasional finding of the potential
Air can be somehow compared to an ocean in pathogen Legionella in two sampled areas during
many physical and biological aspects because of July is of particular interest considering that the
the existence of heterogeneous turbulences, mix- worlds largest outbreak of Legionnaires' disease
ture of components and irregular distribution of happened in Murcia during summer in the very re-
Anales de Biologa 31, 2009 Aerial microbial content in Murcia 13
cent past (Garca-Fulgueiras et al. 2003). Epi- drn B & Pelaz C. 2003. Legionnairesdisease in
Murcia, Spain. Emergent Infectious Diseases 8: 915-
demiological investigation implicated then the
921.
production of aerosols by infected cooling towers Germain G & Summerbell R. 1996. Identifying filamen-
of air conditioning systems, that were presumably tous fungi. A clinical handbook. Star Publishing Co.,
in close proximity to the two sampled areas that Belmont, Ca., USA.
resulted positive in our study. Gorny RL, Reponen T, Willeke K, Schmechel D, Robine
E, Boissier M & Grinshpun SA. 2002. Fungal frag-
Viable bacterial contamination appears to ments as air biocontaminants. Applied and Environ-
reach a maximum peak during autumn in the air mental Microbiology 68: 3522-3531.
analyzed and a minimal level during spring and Gregory PH. 1973. The microbiology of the atmosphere.
Ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
summer, which is in agreement with the deleteri-
Griffin DW. 2007. Atmospheric movement of microorga-
ous effects of high temperature and sunstroke on nisms in clouds of desert dust and implications for
most bacteria. On the other hand, our results are human health. Clinical Microbiological Reviews 20:
indicative that the fungal temporal distributions 459-477.
follows a different trend with highest incidence in Ingold CT. 1971. Fungal spores: their liberation and dis-
persal. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
February. Lighthart B. 2000. Mini-review of the concentration va-
Air serves as a transmission vehicle for poten- riations found in the alfresco atmospheric bacterial
tial pathogens and public health requires constant populations. Aerobiologia 16: 7-16.
Mahdy HM & El-Sehrawi MH. 1997. Airborne bacteria in
investigation on the aeromicrobiological contami-
the atmosphere of El-Taif region, Saudi Arabia. Wa-
nation of the urban air. It should be highlighted ter, Air and Soil Pollution 98: 317-324.
that, taking into account that usually less than 1% Madigan MT, Martinko JM & Parker J. 2008. Brock bio-
of the bacterial community in many environments logy of microorganisms. 10th edition. Prentice Hall,
NJ, USA.
is cultivable under the most favorable conditions
Meier R & Zingre H. 2000. Qualification of air sampler
(Amann et al. 1995), our approach based on data systems: the MAS-100, Swiss Pharma 22: 15-21.
of viable counts may represent an underestimate Nava A, Garca H, Leal-Lozano L & Snchez-Yez JM.
with respect to the real microbial composition. 2004. Microorganismos en la atmsfera de la ciudad
This consideration, justify enough our idea that a de Monterrey, Mxico. Universidad autnoma de
Nuevo Len. Disponible en: http://www.monogra-
continued program for surveillance, prevention fias.com/trabajos32/microorganismos-aire-monte-
and control of microbial pollution should be es- rrey/microorganismos-aire-monterrey.shtml (accedi-
tablished as part of public efforts for an advanced do el 9 de enero de 2009).
quality of life. Oliveira M, Ribeiro H & Abreu I. 2005. Annual variation
of fungal spores in the atmosphere of Porto. Annals
of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 12: 309-
References 315.
Prescott LM, Harley JP & Klein DA. 2004. Microbiologa.
5 edicin. McGraw-Hill Inc., Madrid.
Amann RI, Ludwig W & Schleifer KH. 1995. Phylogene-
Samson RA & Van Reenen-Hoekstra ES. 1988. Intro-
tic identification and in situ detection of individual mi-
duction to Food-borne Fungi. 3rd. edition. Centraal-
crobial cells without cultivation. Microbiological Re-
bureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, Netherlands.
views 59: 143-169.
Shaffer BT & Lighthart B. 1997. Survey of culturable air-
Atlas R & Bartha R. 2002. Ecologa microbiana y micro-
borne bacteria at four diverse locations in Oregon:
biologa ambiental. Ed. Pearson Educacin, Madrid.
urban, rural, forest and coastal. Microbial Ecology
Buchanan RE & Gibbons NE. 1975. Bergeys manual of
34: 167-177.
determinative bacteriology. 8th. Edition. The Wi-
Stepalska D & Wolek J. 2005. Variation of fungal spore
lliams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, USA.
concentrations of selected taxa associated to we-
Cardona JD. 2003. Contaminacin ambiental y enferme-
ather conditions in Cracow, Poland, in 1997. Aero-
dad respiratoria. Revista de Neumologa 15: 1-4.
biologia 21: 43-52.
Di Giorgio C, Krempff A, Guiraud H, Binder H, Tiret C &
Terzieva S, Donnelly J, Ulevicius V, Grinshpun SA, Wi-
Dumenil G. 1996. Atmospheric pollution by airborne
lleke K, Stelma GN & Brenner KP. 1996. Compari-
microorganisms in the city of Marseille. Atmospheric
son of methods for detection and enumeration of air-
Environment 30: 155-160.
borne microorganisms collected by liquid impinge-
Flores-Tena FJ, Pardav LM & Valenzuela I. 2007. Estu-
ment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62:
dio aerobiolgico de la zona San Nicols, municipio
2264-2272.
de Aguascalientes, Mxico. Investigacin y Ciencia
Zhu H., Ohelan PE, Duan T, Raupp GB, Fernando H &
15: 13-18.
Che F. 2003. Experimental study of indoor and out-
Garca-Fulgueiras A, Navarro C, Fenoll D, Garca J,
door airborne bacterial concentrations in Tempe, Ari-
Gonzlez-Diego P, Jimnez Buuales T, Rodriguez
zona, USA. Aerobiologia 19: 201-211.
M, Lpez R, Pacheco F, Ruiz J, Segovia M, Balan-