Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
org
DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2007056
c INRA, EDP Sciences, 2008 Review article
1
National Veterinary Institute, PO Box 8156 Dep., Oslo, Norway
2
Agence Franaise de Scurit Sanitaire des Aliments, 31 av. Tony Garnier, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France
3
Neuropathogenesis Unit, Roslin Institute, Ogston Bldg, West Mains Rd, Edinburgh, EH9 3JF, UK
4
National Veterinary Institute, 75189 Uppsala, Sweden
Abstract Atypical/Nor98 scrapie cases in sheep were diagnosed for the first time in Norway in 1998.
They are now identified in small ruminants in most European countries and represent an increasingly large
proportion of the scrapie cases diagnosed in Europe. Atypical/Nor98 scrapie isolates have shown to be
experimentally transmissible into transgenic mice and sheep but the properties of the TSE agent involved,
like its biological and biochemical features, are so clearly distinct from the agent involved in classical
scrapie that they have provided a challenging diagnostic for many years. No strain diversity has yet been
identified among the atypical/Nor98 scrapie sample cases. The genetic predisposition of the sheep aected
by atypical/Nor98 scrapie is almost inverted compared to classical scrapie, and the exact origin of this
sporadic TSE strain is still speculative, but a spontaneous, non-contagious origin, like sporadic Creutzfeldt-
Jakob disease in humans, can not be excluded. Further transmission and epidemiological studies are needed
to better address this hypothesis.
Table of contents
1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................2
2. Clinical signs in atypical/Nor98 scrapie sheep.........................................................................2
3. Atypical/Nor98 scrapie brains have a dierent appearance and distribution of the PrPSc compared
to classical scrapie as revealed by immunohistochemistry..........................................................4
4. Molecular and biochemical characteristic of atypical/Nor98 scrapie PrPSc .....................................4
4.1. Identification of new PrPSc fragments ............................................................................4
4.2. Deglycosylation experiments .......................................................................................4
4.3. PrPSc cleavage sites ...................................................................................................5
4.4. Glycoprofile of PrPSc .................................................................................................6
4.5. Proteinase K resistance of the PrPSc in atypical/Nor98 scrapie isolates..................................7
5. Absence of detectable lymphotropism in atypical/Nor98 scrapie cases .........................................7
6. Epidemiology ..................................................................................................................7
6.1. Atypical/Nor98 scrapie animals are older .......................................................................8
6.2. Prevalence and factors aecting the ability to detect atypical/Nor98 scrapie cases ...................8
6.3. Few secondary cases have been reported ........................................................................9
6.4. Investigation of risk factors .........................................................................................9
Table I. Categorisation of TSE in small ruminants. The table is adapted from the EFSA opinion (2005)2 .
an active surveillance in apparently healthy the farmer [16]. Two clinical suspect cases
sheep or fallen stock animals and not as clin- reported in Ireland shared the same clinical
ical suspect cases. This might suggest that the sign, incoordination, in addition to weight loss
clinical signs, if present, can be dierent or and nervous behaviour [32]. The case in the
less pronounced than the signs observed for Falkland Islands displayed poor body condi-
classical scrapie, but could also be a result tion and an abnormal behaviour with persis-
of the epidemiology where often only single tent biting at its leg and had shown collaps-
cases are detected in a flock and farmers might ing episodes when it tried to run [14]. The
not contact a veterinarian when only one ani- two cases reported in the UK [23] were also
mal is showing signs of disease. When cases ataxic and showed delayed repositioning of the
are detected through active surveillance the hind limbs. It was noted that both displayed
data available on clinical signs, or absence of signs suggestive of a cerebellar disease but the
such, is many times restricted to what might signs were not identical (hypermetria in the
have been observed by the farmer. There are first case, ataxia, fine head tremor, and abnor-
a limited number of cases described to be de- mal menace response in the second case). In
tected through clinical suspicion where, more addition, the first case exhibited nervousness
detailed information from veterinary clinical while the second case showed dullness, and
examinations is available [23]. it was speculated in this report that these dif-
The salient clinical sign reported in the ferences might be due to dierent clinical
Nor98 aected animals in Norway is ataxia. durations, as supported by the higher level of
Other signs were anxiety and loss of body PrPSc found by Western blot in the brain of the
condition [5, 6]. Hind limb ataxia was also second case.
reported in two Swedish cases, one of them Pruritus has not been reported in the atypi-
was also described as sti and with poor body cal/Nor98 scrapie cases, but one of the cases
condition, while other Swedish cases had not detected on clinical suspicion in the UK
displayed any clinical symptoms according to showed a positive scratch response [23].
Figure 1. PrPSc immunohistochemistry staining using F89/160.1.5 mAb antibody in two cases of atypi-
cal/Nor98 scrapie. A: Perineuronal and neuropil deposits PrPSc in the substantia nigra; note the absence
of intraneuronal staining. B: Plaque-like aggregates in the cerebral cortex (a color version is available on
www.vetres.org).
one Nor98 isolate from Norway by Western Klingeborn et al. [24] used harsher proteinase
blot. These isolates showed a similar pattern K conditions, which, together with the applied
with five bands named band I to V with ap- antibodies, might explain at least partially the
parent molecular weights of around 31, 27, dierences between the two studies. One of
21, 18, and 11 kDa respectively, as illustrated the isolates of the Swedish isolate has been
in Figure 2. When the same isolates are deg- analysed with the method used by Arsac et al.
lycosylated with PNGase before Western blot [2] (TeSeE Western blot, Bio-Rad), giving in
analysis, the profile shows three bands referred these conditions a Western blot profile which
to as bands A, B, and C migrating at around 23, was identical to the Norwegian Nor98 isolates.
18, and 11 kDa. This contrasts with the pat- It is therefore highly plausible that the Nor98-
tern observed in the classical isolate where the PrP7 fragment is equivalent to band C and the
three band pattern (27, 23, and 19 kDa re- PrP-CTF14 is equivalent to band B.
spectively) is transformed into a mono-band
migrating at around 19 kDa after deglycosy-
lation. 4.3. PrPSc cleavage sites
Furthermore, Arsac et al. [2] calculated An additional feature of PrPSc can be estab-
the theoretical molecular weights of mono- lished using Western blotting by epitope map-
glycosylated and bi-glycosylated forms poten- ping. Monoclonal antibodies directed against
tially derived from A, B, and C fragments. epitopes located directly or at the vicinity of
They concluded that the A fragment (23 kDa) the proteinase K cleavage site of the PrPSc
and B fragment were present most probably fragments are used. Multiple proteinase K
also in their di- and mono-glycosylated forms digestion sites at the N-terminus of the human,
as illustrated on Figure 2. Glycosylation of the bovine, and ovine PrP have been identified
A fragment would result in bands at 27 kDa this way. This variability in cleavage sites is
(band II) and 31 kDa (band I) and that of the B thought to result from individual conforma-
fragment in bands at 21 (band III) and 27 kDa tions of the N-termini of the protein that,
(band II). Fragment C (11 kDa) was supposed by conferring varying three-dimensional struc-
to be only unglycosylated because the absence tures to a single protein, lead to the exposure
of detectable bands at 15 and 19 kDa. of distinct cleavage sites.
It is noticeable that the apparent molecular Three recent studies have contributed to
weight of the fragments of PrPSc is dier- new information concerning the cleavage sites
ent in the two molecular published studies: of the atypical/Nor98 scrapie PrPSc [2, 18, 24].
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the atypical/Nor98 scrapie PrPSc , adapted from the results from [2],
showing the Western blot glycoprofile after proteinase K treatment of atypical/Nor98 scrapie using TeSeETM
Western blot (Bio-Rad), without and with removal of the carbohydrates by PNGase treatment. The five band
pattern of the Nor98 isolates is replaced by a three band pattern after PNGase treatment. As a comparison,
the classical scrapie isolate displays the typical three band pattern, replaced by one band after deglycosyla-
tion.
Taken together, their results show, as illus- belled with antibodies raised against the
trated in Figure 3, that: sequence situated upstream of aa 153 [18].
the proteinase K treatment of the isolate as Whatever the explanation is, one can spec-
illustrated by the dierences observed in the ulate that, in the case of the atypical/Nor98
literature [2, 5, 9, 24]. It is quite plausible that scrapie cases, either the agent is transported
most of the discrepancies could disappear by directly from the gut to the central nervous
using common standardised diagnostic tools. system when the TSE agent is ingested, or that
the conversion from PrPC to PrPSc happens
4.5. Proteinase K resistance of the PrPSc originally in the brain in cases of spontaneous
in atypical/Nor98 scrapie isolates origin.
It is a well-established fact that dierent
strains dier significantly in their resistance 6. EPIDEMIOLOGY
to proteolytic degradation. Atypical/Nor98
scrapie isolates have been found to be much Atypical scrapie Nor98 was first detected in
less resistant to proteinase K compared to clas- Norway in 1998 and was first considered an
sical scrapie [9]. This characteristic is believed isolated Norwegian problem. Due to the sus-
to be at least partially responsible for the dis- pected presence of BSE in sheep and goats an
crepancies observed between the test results intensive active surveillance of TSE in small
obtained with dierent diagnostic tests [9], ruminants based on sampling of fallen stock
tests using more stringent proteinase K con- and sheep and goats in normal slaughter by
ditions having problems to identify atypi- the use of rapid tests was introduced in 20024.
cal/Nor98 scrapie cases (Tab. I). The intensive active surveillance has led to the
Klingeborn et al. [24], have demonstrated detection of atypical/Nor98 scrapie cases in
that especially the two smallest fragments of most European countries as well as in the Falk-
the atypical/Nor98 scrapie PrPSc , designated land Islands and in North America [12]. The
PrP7 and PrPCTF14, have reduced proteinase epidemiology of atypical/Nor98 scrapie is not
K resistance which again suggests dierent yet fully understood and it is not established
conformations of the scrapie and Nor98 pri- whether it is naturally transmissible or not un-
ons. der natural conditions.
While the majority of the cases have been
5. ABSENCE OF DETECTABLE detected in sheep, a limited number of atypical
LYMPHOTROPISM IN ATYPICAL/NOR98 scrapie cases in goats have been reported from
SCRAPIE CASES France, Italy5 , and Switzerland [37]. The find-
ings in the Swiss goat, showing that sampling
In contrast to the BSE strain in cattle, most of the brainstem might not be optimal to detect
of the known sheep scrapie strains are lym- atypical scrapie in goats, is of epidemiologi-
photropic, meaning that PrPSc replicate in the cal interest since this might aect the number
lymphoreticular system before neuroinvasion. of cases that are detected [37] but the avail-
Several studies have indicated that it might able epidemiological data on the cases in goats
not be the case for the atypical/Nor98 scrapie, is even more restricted and the following epi-
where no detectable PrPSc is found in pe- demiological information is focussed on data
ripheral lymphoid tissues [5, 9, 31, 41]. What from sheep cases.
determines the organ tropism of a prion strain
is still unknown, but two hypotheses could be 4
Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European
envisaged. The first hypothesis would involve Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001
the presence or absence of a possible cofac- laying down rules for the prevention, control and
tor in the involved cells that will eciently or eradication of certain transmissible spongiform en-
not convert PrPC into PrPSc . The second hy- cephalopathies.
pothesis would be that the tertiary structure of 5
Report on the monitoring and testing of rumi-
the prion agent itself is, or is not, compatible nants for the presence of transmissible spongiform
with the binding to dierent tissue molecules encephalopathy (TSE) in the EU in 2005, Luxem-
such as receptors, therefore favouring or not bourg: Oce for Ocial Publications of the Euro-
the replication of PrPSc in the lymphoid cells. pean Communities, 2006, ISBN 92-79-02299-7.
6.1. Atypical/Nor98 scrapie animals are older countries delicate. First, not all tests used for
The majority of cases have, as mentioned TSE-surveillance in small ruminants will de-
above, been detected through active surveil- tect atypical/Nor98 scrapie. In a dataset on
lance by sampling fallen animals and ani- TSE-surveillance in sheep in Europe from
mals at normal slaughter. Active surveillance 20022005, it was found that 265 of the 294
within the European Union has covered ani- cases detected were detected by the use of the
mals above 18 months of age and this is often same rapid test, even though this test only ac-
determined by dentition. In most countries, counted for 42% of the more than 1.1 million
sheep are not individually identified and year sheep examined6. Second, the results of the
of birth is therefore not always available when tests depend on which part of the brain the
a case is detected. For 84 cases in nine dier- test is applied to since the amount of PrPSc
ent countries where age data was reported, the is dierent in atypical/Nor98 scrapie cases
mean age was 6.5 years6 . In a German dataset compared to classical scrapie [16]. Third,
including 60 atypical cases, almost 60% were the choice of the test for confirmation and
above the age of five years, more than 25% the brain region investigated for confirmation
were older than ten years, and cases up to 20 will also aect the ability to detect atypical
years of age were detected. In the annual TSE- scrapie, since it has been reported that the
report for 2005, data available on the age of atypical/Nor98 scrapie cases might be nega-
atypical scrapie cases is shown in a graph com- tive by immunohistochemistry at the level of
paring classical and atypical scrapie where the the obex [5, 9, 10, 16, 32]. And then finally, the
ages of atypical cases appear to be higher than population structure (age-structure, predomi-
the classical cases5 . nant genotypes, systems for collecting fallen
stock) and the design of the surveillance pro-
6.2. Prevalence and factors aecting the ability gramme can also have an eect on the detected
to detect atypical/Nor98 scrapie cases prevalence. This is of special importance since
The detected prevalence of atypical/Nor98 the atypical/Nor98 scrapie cases appear to be
scrapie cases can be influenced by several fac- older than the classical scrapie cases.
tors, which make real comparison between Some approaches have been made to com-
6
Nremark M., Hopp P., Reported occurrence of pare the prevalences between countries. When
atypical scrapie in Europe, Proceedings of the 11th the rapid test used was taken into account
Symposium of the International Society for Veteri- on data from 2004, the detected prevalence
nary Epidemiology and Economics, Cairns, Aus- of atypical scrapie in the sampled population
tralia: ISVEE 11, 1030, 2006. was quite similar in seven dierent countries6 .
There was a much larger variation when com- of sheep on and o the farm9 . A case-control
paring detected prevalence of classical scrapie study in Norway on 28 case flocks identified
between these countries7. These findings are giving vitamin and mineral feed supplement as
supported by an extended study performed in a risk factor for atypical/Nor98 scrapie, which
200620078. was dierent from a previous study on clas-
Considering geographical aspects, both in sical scrapie in Norway where various types
Norway and Germany, cases of atypical of contacts with scrapie infected flocks were
scrapie have been detected all over the coun- identified as risk factors [21,22]. There was no
try compared to outbreaks of classical scrapie, evidence for association between farms with
which have been concentrated to parts of the cases of atypical scrapie, neither in the Norwe-
country [22, 27]. gian study [22] nor in the Great Britain study9 .
With regards to the epidemiology of atypi-
6.3. Few secondary cases have been reported cal scrapie, many questions still remain to be
The control measures have varied in dif- answered.
ferent countries, and over time. Stamping out Even though some flocks have had sev-
and sampling of all animals in the flock where eral cases this does not imply that atypi-
a positive case has been detected could in- cal scrapie would be contagious. Assuming
crease the possibility to detect secondary cases a spontaneous/sporadic origin, at the detected
and this has been done in some countries, but prevalence in the sampled population in Eu-
the published data on culled animals in re- rope, several cases would be expected in some
lation to detected secondary cases is limited, flocks just by chance related to the size of the
and reports of detecting only single cases in flock. Hopp et al. [22] concluded that Scrapie
each flock are common. But there are some Nor98 has a low transmissibility or might not
reports on flocks where several cases have be transmitted between animals under natural
been detected. In a German comparison of the conditions. Race et al. [35] observed that in
epidemiology of classical scrapie and atypi- the TSE in which lymphoid tissues are exten-
cal scrapie, secondary cases were detected in sively involved, i.e., sheep scrapie and CWD
seven flocks, two of these flocks had more in deer, the horizontal transmission in natu-
than 500 animals and five of the flocks had ral conditions is ecient. In contrast, when
more than 1 500 animals, but it is not clear the peripheral lymphoid tissues are not sub-
how many animals were actually examined in stantially involved, i.e., BSE in cattle and
these flocks, in the same study only single naturally occurring CWD in elk, the hori-
cases were detected in 81 of the flocks [27]. zontal transmission appears to be relatively
Two cases were reported from a flock with inecient. The restrictive neutropism of the
650 sheep in the UK [23]. There is also one atypical/Nor98 is unexplained, but one could
report on two cases detected in a small Irish speculate that this characteristic would explain
flock [32]. at least partially the low rate of natural trans-
mission between sheep in the atypical/Nor98
6.4. Investigation of risk factors scrapie flocks.
A study in Great Britain identified that The detected prevalence of atypical/Nor98
farms with atypical/Nor98 scrapie had signif- scrapie in dierent countries shows a much
icantly higher flock size compared to control- more homogeneous pattern than what can nor-
farms and also a greater number of movements mally be expected for a contagious disease5,6 .
These findings might support the hypothesis of
7
Report on the monitoring and testing of rumi-
nants for the presence of transmissible spongiform 9
Green D., del Rio Vilas V., Birch C., Kao R.,
encephalopathy (TSE) in 2002, European Commis- Patterns of atypical scrapie in Great Britain,
sion, Health and consumer protection directorate in Poster presentation at SVEPM, 28-30
general, ISBN 92-894-5829-1. March 2007, Dipoli, Helsinki/Espoo, Finland,
8
Fediaevsky, Hopp, Nremark, Tongue, unpub- http://www.svepm.org.uk/posters/2007/Green.2.pdf
lished data. [consulted 23 October 2007].
a sporadic, possibly spontaneous, occurrence 1989, did not induce clinical disease after first
of atypical/Nor98 scrapie cases, as first raised passage within 600 days post inoculation.
by Benestad et al. in 2003 [4, 5].
7.4. Successful experimental transmission
7. EXPERIMENTAL TRANSMISSION to sheep
RESULTS To the authors knowledge, only one suc-
7.1. Failure of experimental transmission to cessful experimental transmission of atypi-
standard mice cal/Nor98 scrapie into a natural host has yet
been reported, in the UK10 . An AHQ/AHQ
Experimental transmission studies of atypi- sheep went down with the disease 378 days
cal/Nor98 scrapie material into standard mice after intracerebral inoculation with brain ma-
(RIII, VM, and C56Bl mice) have been per- terial from homologous AHQ/AHQ atypical
formed but without succeeding in transmitting case. The inoculated sheep showed weight
the disease within the life span of the mice. loss, altered behaviour and compulsive cir-
cling, and all the neuropathological and
7.2. Successful experimental transmission molecular characteristics of the donor sheep
to transgenic mice
was preserved upon transmission, including
The later development of lines of trans- the predominant accumulation of PrPSc im-
genic mice expressing ovine VRQ PrP have munostaining in the cerebellar, thalamic, basal
given new information about the agent, by ganglions, and cortical regions, and its relative
eciently transmitting the disease [25] and absence in the brain stem, and the presence
therefore proving for the first time that atyp- of the distinctive lower band at approximately
ical scrapie (also called discordant because 12 kDa by Western blot investigation. A sec-
they were not identified by all the diagnostic ond case of successful transmission has been
tests) /Nor98 was a truly infectious TSE agent. reported by the same research group but has
Furthermore, the neuro-anatomical distri- not yet been published.
bution of PrPSc was analysed by histoblot
in discordant and Nor98-infected mice at the 8. ASSOCIATION OF PRP GENETICS WITH
terminal stage of the disease to further char- ATYPICAL SCRAPIE
acterise the TSE agent involved. The PrPSc Almost a decade after the discovery of atyp-
deposition pattern was clearly distinct from ical/Nor98 scrapie [5], there are still many
the other analysed TSE isolates, and was re- unsolved questions about the genetic associa-
markably similar for all the discordant/Nor98 tion between PrP and susceptibility. Evidence
isolates, with the preferential involvement of so far indicates that atypical scrapie aects
the thalamus, corpus callosum, cerebral cor- animals with PrP genotypes dierent from
tex, and, to a lesser extent, of the superior classical scrapie [2, 3, 9, 26, 27, 29, 30, 33, 36].
colliculus. No PrPSc was detected in the hy- The appearance of atypical/Nor98 scrapie and
pothalamus, midbrain, brain stem, or cerebel- classical scrapie in the same flock has not
lum. The identical pattern found in all the mice been reported as a common event, although
brains infected by discordant/Nor98 isolates there is no apparent genetic reason for this: in-
(nine sheep and one goat) indicates that the deed the separation of susceptible genotypes
agent involved is closely related, if not iden- would perfectly permit infection with both dis-
tical. eases in an infected flock. It almost appears as
10
7.3. Experimental transmission into bank voles Simmons M.M., Simmons H.A., Lockey R.,
Konold T., Spenser Y.I., Spiropoulos J., Cliord
In an Italian study [7], all the classical D., Phenotype is preserved following experimen-
scrapie isolates used transmitted eciently to tal transmission of atypical scrapie to sheep, in
bank voles with incubation times ranging be- Abstract book Conference NeuroPrion 2006
tween 140 and 300 days, but the Nor98 sam- Strategies, advances and trends towards protection
ples, including a sheep that died in the UK in of society, 36 October 2006, Torino, Italy, p. 219.
if atypical/Nor98 scrapie is occupying a host than that for classical scrapie, may be due
niche that is occupied by sheep that are geneti- to the unusual genotypes that are involved.
cally resistant to classical scrapie. Why should This hypothesis is nevertheless weakened by
that be so? Is this an indicator of competition the observation that the sheep carrying the
between strains, an exclusion of double infec- ARQ/ARQ PrP genotype, susceptible to both
tion? We do not know the answer yet. There is classical and atypical/Nor98 scrapie, are also
an alternative view that atypical/Nor98 scrapie older when aected by atypical/Nor98 scrapie
is a spontaneous (sporadic, non-contagious) than by classical scrapie11 .
disease, because there are in general only in- There are now additional studies of
dividual atypical/Nor98 scrapie cases detected atypical/Nor98 scrapie from Germany [27],
in each flock. Atypical/Nor98 scrapie would France [2], and the UK [7, 36], all point-
not be the first TSE to be classified as such: ing to the same conclusion, that this type
sporadic CJD (sCJD) in humans also reveals of scrapie is strongly associated with PrP
no indication to the origin of disease. Cases of codons 141 and 154 (Tab. II). Importantly,
sCJD are unrelated, non-familiar, and have no they described ARR/ARR carriers with atyp-
apparent genetic association. They happen at ical scrapie [2, 9, 27, 33, 36]. The susceptibility
any place and independent of other TSE [28]. of RR171 homozygotes has been a major con-
It remains to be established in the coming cern because national breeding and eradication
years by collecting more cases whether the plans for classical scrapie in EU member states
spontaneous disease model will be correct or are inadvertently creating a high frequency of
whether atypical scrapie is an infectious dis- ARR/ARR animals. The studies also proved
ease like most TSE with an aetiology similar that VA136 heterozygotes were susceptible to
and maybe complementary to classical atypical/Nor98 scrapie [2, 36] but this appears
scrapie. to be linked to the presence of the AF141 RQ
allele in these animals.
One of the first full descriptions of the PrP
Atypical/Nor98 scrapie is also found in
genetics for atypical/Nor98 scrapie was pro-
vided by Moum et al. [30]. Performing four- goats. Like in sheep, goats with HH154 and
codon genotyping (codons 136, 141, 154, and HR154 PrP genotypes appear to be targeted by
this atypical/Nor98 scrapie [2], although it is
171) on 38 cases of Nor98 collected between
too early to confirm the association statisti-
1998 and 2004, they came to three major con-
clusions. Firstly, all animals were of AA136 cally.
PrP genotype. The VRQ allele conferring sus- Experimental challenges of sheep and
ceptibility to classical scrapie in Norway [40] ovine PrP transgenic mice with atypical/Nor98
was completely absent from Nor98 cases al- scrapie sources are essential tools for the fu-
though it was present in healthy flock mates. ture to decipher the true extent of susceptible
Secondly, there was an over-representation of genotypes. We may then also be able to ex-
animals carrying the AHQ allele, in HH154 ho- plain why the VRQ/AHQ genotype has a low
mozygous and HR154 heterozygous genotypes. risk for both types of scrapie, although it
Thirdly, the AF141 RQ allele appeared to confer is composed of the two alleles with highest
higher susceptibility than the AL141 RQ allele. susceptibility risk for classical [3] and atypi-
Indeed, the AF141 RQ allele conferred a higher cal/Nor98 [2, 27, 30, 36] scrapie, respectively.
risk than the AHQ allele. The relative high The discovery of atypical/Nor98 scrapie has
frequency of the ARR allele in aected het- opened up a new phase in the exploration
erozygous animals was also surprising. This of the link between the PrP gene and dis-
allele is quite rare in classical scrapie cases. ease, which in the end is likely to contribute
But no ARR/ARR aected sheep were found. fundamentally to the understanding of the un-
The mean age at onset was six years, but derlying molecular mechanisms.
no significant association between age and
genotype was revealed. It could, however, be 11
Norwegian data, Benestad, Bratberg, Hopp, un-
possible that this average age, which is higher published data.
Table II. Compilation of genotypes from 241 cases of atypical/Nor98 scrapie from four countries [2,27,30,
36].
regards to control measures applied in positive [10] Buschmann A., Lhken G., Schultz J., Erhardt
flocks within the European Union4 . G., Groschup M.H., Neuronal accumulation of ab-
normal prion protein in sheep carrying a scrapie-
Despite the fact that this strain is now better resistant genotype (PrPARR/ARR), J. Gen. Virol.
characterised, its origin is still unknown and (2004) 85:27272733.
further transmission studies, as well as col- [11] Collinge J., Sidle K.C., Meads J., Ironside J., Hill
lection and analysis of epidemiological data A.F., Molecular analysis of prion strain variation and
from the field, are needed to give information the aetiology of new variant CJD, Nature (1996)
about the pathogenesis of this strain to fully 383:685690.
understand the epidemiology and to assess the [12] Cook W., Nor98-like strain of scrapie found in
possible zoonotic aspects. Wyoming, Wyoming Livestock Board (2007).
[13] De Bosschere H., Roels S., Benestad S.L.,
Acknowledgements. Work in the authors laborato- Vanopdenbosch E., Scrapie case similar to Nor98 di-
ries was supported by the NeuroPrion European Net- agnosed in Belgium via active surveillance, Vet. Rec.
work of Excellence, grants from the Norwegian Re- (2004) 155:707708.
search Council (146916/140 and 161748/110) and [14] Epstein V., Pointing S., Halfacre S., Atypical
from Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research scrapie in the Falkland Islands, Vet. Rec. (2005)
Council UK. 157:667668.
[15] Everest S.J., Thorne L., Barnicle D.A., Edwards
REFERENCES J.C., Elliott H., Jackman R., Hope J., Atypical prion
protein in sheep brain collected during the British
[1] Aguzzi A., Heikenwalder M., Polymenidou M., scrapie-surveillance programme, J. Gen. Virol. (2006)
Insights into prion strains and neurotoxicity, Nat. Rev. 87:471477.
Mol. Cell Biol. (2007) 8:552561.
[16] Gavier-Widn D., Nremark M., Benestad S.,
[2] Arsac J.N., Androletti O., Bilheude J.M., Lacroux Simmons M., Renstrm L., Bratberg B., Elvander M.,
C., Benestad S.L., Baron T., Similar biochemical sig- af Segerstad C.H., Recognition of the Nor98 variant of
natures and prion protein genotypes in atypical scrapie scrapie in the Swedish sheep population, J. Vet. Diagn.
and Nor98 cases, France and Norway, Emerging Infect. Invest. (2004) 16:562567.
Dis. (2007) 13:5865.
[17] Gonzlez L., Martin S., Jerey M., Distinct
[3] Baylis M., Goldmann W., The genetics of scrapie in profiles of PrP(d) immunoreactivity in the brain of
sheep and goats, Curr. Mol. Med. (2004) 4: 385396. scrapie- and BSE-infected sheep: implications for dif-
ferential cell targeting and PrP processing, J. Gen.
[4] Baron T., Biacabe A.G., Arsac J.N., Benestad S., Virol. (2003) 84:13391350.
Groschup M.H., Atypical transmissible spongiform
encephalopathies (TSEs) in ruminants, Vaccine (2007) [18] Gretzschel A., Buschmann A., Langeveld J.,
25:56255630. Groschup M.H., Immunological characterization of
abnormal prion protein from atypical scrapie cases in
[5] Benestad S.L., Sarradin P., Thu B., Schnheit J., sheep using a panel of monoclonal antibodies, J. Gen.
Tranulis M.A., Bratberg B., Cases of scrapie with un- Virol. (2006) 87:37153722.
usual features in Norway and designation of a new
type, Nor98, Vet. Rec. (2003) 153:202208. [19] Hayashi H.K., Yokoyama T., Takata M., Iwamaru
Y., Imamura M., Ushiki Y.K., Shinagawa M., The N-
[6] Benestad S.L., Bratberg B., Atypical scrapie- terminal cleavage site of PrPSc from BSE diers from
Nor98, in: Beat Hrnlimann, Detlev Riesner, Hans that of PrPSc from scrapie, Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Kretzschmar (Eds), Prions in Humans and Animals, de Commun. (2005) 328:10241027.
Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, 2006, pp. 630634. [20] Hope J., Wood S.C., Birkett C.R., Chong A.,
[7] Bruce M.E., Nonno R., Foster J., Goldmann W., Di Bruce M.E., Cairns D., Goldmann W., Hunter N.,
Bari M., Esposito E., Benestad S.L., Hunter N., Agrimi Bostock C.J., Molecular analysis of ovine prion protein
U., Nor98-like sheep scrapie in the United Kingdom in identifies similarities between BSE and an experimen-
1989, Vet. Rec. (2007) 160:665666. tal isolate of natural scrapie, J. Gen. Virol. (1999)
80:14.
[8] Buschmann A., Groschup M.H., TSE eradication in
small ruminants - quo vadis?, Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. [21] Hopp P., Ulvund M.J., Jarp J., A case-control
Wochenschr. (2005) 118:365371. study on scrapie in Norwegian sheep flocks, Prev. Vet.
Med. (2001) 51:183198.
[9] Buschmann A., Biacabe A.G., Ziegler U., Bencsik
[22] Hopp P., Omer M.K., Heier B.T., A case-control
A., Madec J.Y., Erhardt G., Lhken G., Baron T.,
study of scrapie Nor98 in Norwegian sheep flocks, J.
Groschup M.H., Atypical scrapie cases in Germany
Gen. Virol. (2006) 87:37293736.
and France are identified by discrepant reaction pat-
terns in BSE rapid tests, J. Virol. Methods (2004) [23] Konold T., Davis A., Bone G., Bracegirdle J.,
117:2736. Everitt S., Chaplin M., Saunders G.C., Cawthraw S.,
Simmons M.M., Clinical findings in two cases of atyp- [32] Onnasch H., Gunn H.M., Bradshaw B.J.,
ical scrapie in sheep: a case report, BMC Vet. Res. Benestad S.L., Bassett H.F., Two Irish cases of scrapie
(2007) 3:2. resembling Nor98, Vet. Rec. (2004) 155:636637.
[24] Klingeborn M., Wik L., Simonsson M., Renstrm [33] Orge L., Galo A., Machado C., Lima C., Ochoa
L.H., Ottinger T., Linne T., Characterization of pro- C., Silva J., Ramos M., Simas J.P., Identification of
teinase K-resistant N- and C-terminally truncated putative atypical scrapie in sheep in Portugal, J. Gen.
PrP in Nor98 atypical scrapie, J. Gen. Virol. (2006) Virol. (2004) 85:34873491.
87:17511760. [34] Prusiner S.B., Novel proteinaceous infectious par-
[25] Le Dur A., Bringue V., Androletti O., Reine F., ticles cause scrapie, Science (1982) 216:136144.
La T.L., Baron T., Bratberg B., Vilotte J.L., Sarradin [35] Race B.L., Meade-White K.D., Ward A., Jewell J.,
P., Benestad S.L., Laude H., A newly identified type Miller M.W., Williams E.S., Chesebro B., Race R.E.,
of scrapie agent can naturally infect sheep with resis- Levels of abnormal prion protein in deer and elk with
tant PrP genotypes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2005) chronic wasting disease, Emerging Infect. Dis. (2007)
102:1603116036. 13:824830.
[26] Lhken G., Buschmann A., Groschup M.H., [36] Saunders G.C., Cawthraw S., Mountjoy S.J.,
Erhardt G., Prion protein allele A136 H154Q171 is as- Hope J., Windl O., PrP genotypes of atypical scrapie
sociated with high susceptibility to scrapie in purebred cases in Great Britain, J. Gen. Virol. (2006) 87:3141
and crossbred German Merinoland sheep, Arch. Virol. 3149.
(2004) 149:15711580.
[37] Seuberlich T., Botteron C., Benestad S.L.,
[27] Lhken G., Buschmann A., Brandt H., Eiden Brnisholz H., Wyss R., Kihm U., Schwermer H.,
M., Groschup M.H., Erhardt G., Epidemiological and Friess M., Nicolier A., Heim D., Zurbriggen A.,
genetical dierences between classical and atypical Atypical scrapie in a Swiss goat and implications
scrapie cases, Vet. Res. (2007) 38:6580. for transmissible spongiform encephalopathy surveil-
[28] Mead S., Prion disease genetics, Eur. J. Hum. lance, J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. (2007) 19:28.
Genet. (2006) 14:273281. [38] Somerville R.A., Chong A., Mulqueen O.U.,
[29] Moreno C.R., Moazami-Goudarzi K., Laurent P., Birkett C.R., Wood S.C., Hope J., Biochemical typing
Cazeau G., Androletti O., Chadi S., Elsen J.M., of scrapie strains, Nature (1997) 386:564.
Calavas D., Which PrP haplotypes in a French sheep [39] Stockman S., Scrapie: an obscure disease in
population are the most susceptible to atypical scrapie? sheep, J. Comp. Pathol. (1913) 26:317327.
Arch. Virol. (2007) 152:12291232.
[40] Tranulis M.A., Osland A., Bratberg B., Ulvund
[30] Moum T., Olsaker I., Hopp P., Moldal T., Valheim M.J., Prion protein gene polymorphisms in sheep with
M., Moum T., Benestad S.L., Polymorphisms at natural scrapie and healthy controls in Norway, J. Gen.
codons 141 and 154 in the ovine prion protein gene Virol (1999) 80:10731077.
are associated with scrapie Nor98 cases, J. Gen. Virol.
(2005) 86:231235. [41] Vidal E., Tortosa R., Costa C., Benavides J.,
Francino O., Snchez-Robert E., Prez V., Pumarola
[31] Nentwig A., Oevermann A., Heim D., Botteron M., Lack of PrP(Sc) immunostaining in intracranial ec-
C., Zellweger K., Drgemller C., Zurbriggen A., topic lymphoid follicles in a sheep with concomitant
Seuberlich T., Diversity in neuroanatomical distribu- non-suppurative encephalitis and Nor98-like atypical
tion of abnormal prion protein in atypical scrapie, scrapie: a case report, Vet. J. (2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.
PLoS Pathog. (2007) 3:e82. tvjl. 2007.04.014.