Copyright information
regarding copying of text and images
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Copyright Regulations 1978
WARNING
Copyright owners are entitled to take legai action against persons who intringe their
copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright
infringement. Certain dealings with copyright will not constitute an infringement, including:
A reproduction that is a fair dealing under the Copyright Act 1978 (the Act), including
a fair dealing for the purposes of research or study; or
reproduction that is authorised by the copyright owner.
It is a fair dealing to make a reproduction for the purposes of research or study, of one or
more articles on the sarne subject in a periodical publication, of, in the case of any other
work, of a reasonable portion of a work.
In the case of @ published work in hardcopy form that is not less than 10 pages and is not
an artistic work, 10% of the number of pages, oF one chapter, is a reasonable portion.
In the case of a published work in electronic form only, a reasonable portion is not more
than, in the aggregate, 10% of the number of words in the work.
More extensive reproduction may constitute fair dealing, To determine whether it does, it is
necessary to have regard to the criteria set out in section 12 of the Act.
A court may impose penatties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements
relating to copyright material
Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and
infringement involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic.chapter two
The Road to Resilience
“would you tell me, please, which way | ought to 90
from here?" asked Alice.
‘That depends a good deal on where you want to get
to," said the Cat.
Lenns Carroll
Jermaine had troubles in school and with the polige since he was
eleven years old. His mother was the sole parent and worked
hard at tio johs to make ends meet. Left to fend for himself.
Jermaine gravitated fo the strect, and his mate role models soon
became older gan leaders, who initiated hin into delinquency as
@"Tookout.”
By age fourteen, Jermaine was having both beliavioral and learn-
ing problems and was expelled from school. Advi on the streets,
he wound up tn the jucenile justice system, shuttled between resi-
dlential placements,
In residential placements, Jermaine’s life actually inmproved. He
attended school and fed his hunger Jor positive adult mentors. He32
The Resitlence Revolution
aso picked up weve skills for turning his life around and w fresh
determination to “do good when he returned to his community,
With each neve placement, jermaine renerced his determination to
stay in school and xet ajo He really ddl try. Bud because of his
prior reputation. hie alterpts to reenroll in school were not met
Leith open arms. Getting: a job was not any easier unless he lied! on
applications about his delinquency history, formaine was just tno
twell-nowen inthe ttle world in which he fived, Hie vote to just
“chill cmd stay aay from his “boys” waned. There was nothing,
ositice to nelace the negatice trappins of his precious life.
Jermaine had leadership abilities and soem yathered around him a
sr0up of « dozen or so peers licing in his housing project. Just as
he twas getting used to the expensice clothes and the clout that
Dring @ cane leader affords @ young entreprencur in the ety. a
clash with a récal gang turned bloody. Jermaine teas artested and
charged with possession of firearms and drugs und assault with a
deadty weapon. Thorgh he was only fifteen, being locked up was
«vs familia as home, Me knew the staff. the routine, and many of
the other residents.
During more than two years in lockup, Jermaine gained more
echication and counseling, He also became wiser and less nave
and began to lose hope. How cauld ke possibly make it ance he
teas releaseel® What would make this tine any different than the
ast? He knew that the legal consequences of eontireins in his
actions would be much stiffer once he turned vivhteen,
Jermatne’s story is echoed in the lives of thousands of toduy's
youth, ICS not suprising that an impoverished working single
mother would be overwhelmed by the challenges of parenting.
It not surprising that a fatherless kid would thn to alder peers
fora sense of belonging, or that trouble in school would con-
tribute to delinquency and emotional problems. We know all this.
What we don't seem to know is how to. change the script; how to
Uansform a story with “inevitable” elements of risk, fillure, and
despair into a story of hope. Parents, schools, community mem-
hers, and the juvenile jastice systein all struggte to turn the lives
of kids like Jermaine wound in time, while they still have the
Denefit of the protections soctety axsigus—or should assign—tochildven, But what works? As we saw in Amy's story in the previ=
ous chapter. kids in pain take their problems forward into adult
hood. To smvive the future, they nced to develop resilience now
The Science of Resilience
The development of human resiliency is none oTher
than the process of healthy human development.
Bonne Benaret
‘The setence of resitience is a relatively recent arrival an the psy
chological scene. New studies that chronicle the process by
which even our most difficulé youth ean overcome obstacles andl
become positive, conhibuting adults have sparked a resilience
revolution,
Resilience is the innate hina sbility to rebound from adversity
with even greater strength to meet fture challenges." A leading,
researcher; Emily Werner, described resilience as the potential
to achieve positive life outcomes in spite of risk.’
Initially; some scientists hypothesized that resili
personality trait found only in u few “invulnerable” superkids.
But research suggests otherwise: Resilience is the norm.
Huynans were created with the tendengy tv overcome all but the
most disastrous of experiences. Exch of us hus desceneled from
ancestors who sravived all extrenses of hardship. Youth at risk
like Jermaine are not doomed kids, not lost eatises, nat hope!
‘Though the challenges surrounding then loom kage, they are
still vesilient kids with unlimited potential
nee was a rare
Stndies following children into adhlthoodl found thit aluost
‘without regard to the risks experienced, sixty percent eventually
nade positive adjustinents.” Even children exposed to severe
trauma can turn their lives around if they can find supportive
persons.” Snecess may not come cquickly; typieally youth at risk
0 through lurbulent years as teens and young adults hefore
maturing and stabilizing in the third decade of life.
sonarus
Chapter Two The Road to Resilence3
The Resilience Revolution
The good news for those who eare about kids in pain is that
resilience consists of move than an individual's internal
strengths, Italso includes extemal supports called “protective
factors.” The mast potent protective factor is the presence of one
caring adult in a childs life,
During much of the 20th century; psychology was preaccupied
with pathology: and tomes were written about anger guilt,
@epression, and ansiety, But after decades dwelling on the dark
side of husnan behavior. a psychology of human strengths is
‘emerging, In fact, as we'll discuss later strength-based philoso-
phies of youth development have been advocated for centuries,
Studies of strengths broaden our view of behavior problems
hevond the narrow psychiatric lahots of mental disorders as con-
tained in the Diagnostic and Stetistical Manual of Mental
Disorders (DSM). Prominent child psychiatrists Jon McClellan
and John Werry note thet only a few disorders, such as autism, fit
the classical meclieal model. The most common problems with
challenging young people—anger, fear, impulsiveness, inatten-
tion, and moodiness—are part of normal maturation or the result
of stress in the environment." Such problems are best addressed
by opportunities for positive development.
Sparked by leaclership of the Ameriean Psychological Association
{APA researchers ure once again exploring how to cultivate
analitics such as courage, responsibility, and hope. "Much of the
task of prevention in this new centusy will be to understand and
carn how to foster these virtues in young people,” declared for-
ter APA president Martin Selissman in 2003,
Me believe that these virtues or principles of resiience can be
taht, Bach of us has the potential fo become that one earing
adult man at-risk child's fe, that most potent protective fietor
that helps hold risk at bay: In an ideal world, however, children
have more then one protective fictor: They should have a range
of external support from family: schools and community: and the
juvenile justiceSystems in Conflict
A child in conflict needs to be surrounded by a multifaceted sup-
portive conuuunity. Sadly, the stakeholders in the child's ecology
oflen apenite in isolation or against each other, rather than col-
laborating with one another and the child, In fact, as Chapter
One noted, those potential sources of support—Lamily, school,
Taw—can become sources of the most intense stress. Our kids
are in conflict, but so are our systems (see Figure 1).
gure
Systems in Conflict
‘School, Chureh,
and Community
Family
The family is perhaps the most influential system. Every family
fanctions as a complete system—a whole made up of interrelated
and interdependent parts—and the unwritten goa! of every fami-
ly is to bring that system into balance or equilibrium. Like an
old-fashioned scale, when something is added to one side, a cor-
responding adjustment must be made on the other side. As a
result, individual faruily members become very adept at intu-
itively sensing what is needed and naturally fulfilling that role.
35
‘chapter "wo The Road to ReineThe Resilience Revolution
Me often see how this balance is upset when a rebellious child
enters x structured program and begins to exhibit authentic
change for the better: No family would ever admit to wanting a som
cor daughter to remain gangeinvelved or drugeadlicted, But fan
les are generally maware of the power of predietalle elit
uu Thus when Jimmy suddenly makes heulthy strides, it disrpts
the entire system and throws it out of balance, Subconseiousty the
‘whole faily works to got Jimmy back inte the role he was in
Dotore—so that they can maintain their own familiar roles as well
“Those who work in residential programs for chensieal dependen-
cy recognize thal the leacting saboteuir ofall the great work an
addict has achieved is often his or her spouse—probably the
very person who got the addict to enter treatment in the frst
place hy finally threwtening to leave or actually leaving, A wife,
for example, after having suffered for yeurs from her husband's
addiction, may be the first to smugele in boowe or ditugs on
family visit, Why? Because she feels threatened in her role of
caretaer. Though she may hate that role it is atleast fam
and predictable: it feels sufer than having to invent 1 new role
opposite a husband who suddenly wants a say in how the chile
dren are reared and the finances are managed
1s nol muck different when a teen comes out of a program talk
ing anew kind of talk: Again, the unwritten goal ofevery fail
‘so bring the system into equilibyium, In the midst ofa crisis,
ost family members are unaware that they are suliconsciowsly
adapting and responding tn the actions of the offering member
because the system as a whole seems io be working, based on
their previous experience
Depending upon the extent and duration of the rehellion, ane
family member might hive emerged as the caretaker, while
another has become the protector One has become an enabler
and another has become the forgotten child. The offending child
plays the most important role ofall: the scapegoat. Without
Jimeny or Shelly playing the distracting role of scapexoat, other
family members’ dysfunctional behaviors hecome more evident
‘When Straight Ahead Ministries conducted focus groups of juve-
nite offenders asking kids what they fell they needed to sealiymake it, one of their top two responses was, “Work with our farn-
ilies, too.” One boy said, “I've been making a lot of changes here,
but when I talk about it with my mom on the phone, she feels
threatened by it, saying, ‘So now you think you're better than the
rest of us?”
1's important for those of us who work with troubled kids to
understand that parents tend to sebutage the success of their
child if they feel the work is being done without them. Parents
‘want to deel that their bond with their child is a contributing. fac-
tor to success, not a detracting one, But ifwe can come alongside
parents and support them in what is ultimately their job—to
offer their child the best shot possible at becoming a healthy
adult—we can forge: a powerlul alliance. Even when the parent
is difftcult ta work with (prompting that tit-for-tat reaction), we
need to remember that itis always m the child's best interest to
have family support—and do everything we can to treat parents
with respeet as well,
Sadly, most schools and juvenile treatuent programs focus little
or no attention on working with the families of their students,
but instead simply cast blame, assuming the funily is at fall
This mentality of blame only creates further distrust in those
who have the greatest stake in the youngster’s success. Parents
are the child's first and most important teachers, and even those
who are experiencing, great problems also have great strengths
that can be uncovered if we choose ta fight for pavents, rather
than against them.
Barbara Ihuff, the founding director of Federation of Families for
Children’s Mental Health, calls for eliminating the adjective
“dysfimetional” as a descriptor for parents." “Ifyou need hibels,”
parents say, “eall us overstressed anel undersnpported.” Pareats
of kids in pain are parents in pain, What father or mother doesn't
worry about whether they are “good enough” parents?
Everything we want troubled kids to learn, their parents might
also need help with, including self-esteem and problem-solving
skills. By contrast, the blame game only sabotages the partner
ships that are necessary to meet the needs of children on the
edge.
37
Chapter Two The Rood to Resioan
The Resilience Revolution
School, Church, and Community
‘The democratic ideals of the United States once sparked reform
in education and the mental health moverient. Ironseally, the
tation knowa for its idealism: has reverted to pessimisrn about its
young. The effects of this line of thinking are only too apparent.
Schools are required to honor the legal principle of zero reject
and meet the educational needs ofall students. But calls far zero
tolerance have ted to massive overuse of suspension and expal.
sion. The formal policy is “Leave no child behind,” but the prose
suze to raise test scores trumps concern for growth of character
A high schooi teacher told us, “My job is t teach the seventy
percent who are good kids. Our school would be hetter off with:
‘out the others.”
And as we have seen in Jermaine’s story, there aren't many: sece
ond chanees for kids who have been expelled, Schools develop
policies to keep such youth out of the classroom: One prieipal
told us it is his job to “amputate” troublesome students, Parents
of kids in pain may find that teachers and administrators blame
them for their children's behavior.
isrit only schools that let down our kids in pain, Neighborhood
housing authorities evict families with troubled kids, and citizens
expect police and the justice system to remove delinquents From
the community: Most employers refuse to risk hiring ex-offend.
e¥s, and even churehes do not want “bad” kids mixing with
“good” kids. Although mental health providers are legully
required to have parity with other medical services, managed
care has limited treatment to the point that the term “eare-less”
might he a more accurate deser iption. Prevention is ignored, and
serious problems get superficial assessments and symptom man.
agement.
Juvenile Justice System
The best evidence that our system fils kids is that most youth
placed in juventle justice facilities ure rearrested within just one
year of their release, Troubled, uneducated eighteen-year-olds
are likely to drift ar heeome homeless upon being eut loose fromthe final safety net of the juvenile system. Though they may have
passed into technical adulthood, their hasie needs have still not
been met,
Recent decades have seen a tendency to abandon our most diff
cult kids, ‘There has been a steady dismantling of the juvenile jus-
tive system that was ercated just aver a century ago. Juvenile
courts were established on the legat principle of insaring the best
interests of the child. Calls for “jiast desserts” have turned back
the clock as resources shift om prevention to punishment, The
Jeast effective public institution, the adult prison. is used as a
depositary for thousands of our most troubled and needy youth,
Unfortunately; even in wealthy nations such as the United States,
the best interests of children are often subordinate to other pri-
orities. The United States is a world leader when it comes to
exacting “justice” through punitive measures. While comprising
only five pereent of the world’s population, the United States
houses twenty-three percent of the world's pris
slates, fourtcen-vearolds are declaved adults and incarcerated
with the gencral population of adult prisons, which violates com-
amon sense and international lav:
ners." In Many
Early reformers who launched a separate court for children did
so based upon the commonsense helief that children were differ-
ent mentally from adults. Their convictions have been proven
true through contemporary brain research, as we have seen in
Chapter One.
Aleoholies Anonymous defines “insanity” as doing the same
thing over and over, but expecting different results, This seems
to apply to our current system of providing services for challemg-
ing youth. Reversing the impact of decades of punishment and
deficit-based intervention will require major shifis in thinking
and action. A narrow focus on the problems of youth and their
families has blinded us to their strengths and potential for great-
ness. But in the fave of these challenges, there is ulso a chance
for fresh rediscovery of age-old wisdom.
Tis time to reject deftcit-hased thinking and to reelaim the opti-
nist of those who pioneered work with challenging students.
Few cupture that spirit better than Karl Wilker, who transformed
39
Chapter Two The Road to Resienes#0
The Resitience Revolution
Berlin's worst training school for delinquents, an infamous insti-
tution surrounded by barbed wire.
Wilker's ideas were simple, He demancled that those in authority
show respeet forall youth, even those who had not yet leumed to
be respectful. He told his teachers and youth workers to search
‘or streneths concealed beneath problems. And he demanded
thet all young people take responsibility for their behavion, par-
‘iculaely those who in the past had shown only irresponsibility,
As result of Wilker’s reforms, the worst institutional climate of
Coercion became a model climate of mutual respect between the
young and the old, Wilker attributed this success to a profound
helfef in the positive potentials of youth."
Reclaiming Our Progressive Past
What we want t0 achieve tn our work with young peo~
plc ts to find and strengthen the positive and healthy
elements, no matter how deeply they are hidden. we
euthasiastically belteve in the existence of those ele-
ments even in the seemingly worst of our adolescents
Karl tiiiker®
Wilker's ransforming ideas were not new ideas, From earliest
times, people have wrestled with the question of how to rear
responsible, resilient children. Every era has seen pioneering,
relormers who spoke out for treating children with dignity and
respect, and many nations have promoted progressive ideas for
working with troubled youth
Plato argued that teaching respect to the young. was move impor-
tant than giving them riches. But he cautioned that respect could
4ot be teaght by reprimand, but only through adulls engaged
with lifelong visible practice ofall they hope to teach youth
Simply, children learn respect by being treated with respect,Dutch educator and clergyman Erasmus (2466-1535) observed
that harsh pimishment was a result of adults indulging their own
passions, rather than responding helpfilly to the exrors of the
young. In France, Montaigne (1533-1592) proclaimed, “Away
with violence! and lashed out at those who showed no kindness
to childen, but instead used methods of “horror and crtelly:"™
Afier the Napoleonie wars, Johann Heinrich Pestalozi
(1746-1827) of Switzerland founded orphanages for street chil-
dien, He taught his staff that the hiblea! eall to “hecome as a lit-
tle child” meant adults should treat cbikelien with deep respect,
as equals hefore the Creator:
‘These were all minority views in materialistic, dictatorial cule
tures. The rise of democraey in the 19th century had a profo
effcet on education, mental health, ancl juvenile justice.
Dorothea Dix (1802-1887) sparked a worldwide mental health
movement when she called for treating troubled pessons with
respect and dignity
nd
At the dawn of the 20th centiny, Ellen Key of Sweden
(1849-1926) wrote of “soul murder in the selools” and called for
an end te demeaning punishnvent." in Italy, Maria Montessori
(1857-1952) railed against “school slavery” and created schools
for children from the shuvis, showing they had highly “absorbent
minds.” American educates William Kilpatrick (1871-1965)
described the ineflectiveness of punitive diseipline iv schools,
and be documented that the average 19th-century Boston school
of four hundred pupils gave sisty-five swhippings a day, one every
sis minutes.”
nn 21809, Jame: Addams (1860-1935) founcled dhe modern javenide
cour’ in Chicago, She alliee with the [lois Bar Association to
remove children from adult prisons and to provide treatment,
uuppropriate to the
Meanwhile, in Poland, janusz Korezak (1878-1942) founded
orphanages for street kids that operated on the principle of the
cchild’s right to respect, He called for treating children not as
future citizens, but as citizens in embryo, He argued that adults
should listen to children and involve them in governing their
needs
47
‘Chapter To The Roe! to Resilience#2
The Resilience Revolution
communities. Korezak challenged the low view of children that
was hele in both capitalist and communist societies:
The market vile of the very young is small, Only in
the sight of God and the Law is the apple blossom
worth as much as the apple. green shoots as much as
afield of ripe corn.”
Soon these progressive ideas spread to all of the world’s demoe-
racies, By 1028, an international study found that model schools
to teach delinquents self-governance existed worldwide."
Unfortunately few of these progressive ideas lasted beyond the
tenures of the reformers. Punitive discipline was still in vogue,
‘There were no formit programs to train new generations of pio-
fessionals in these progressive methods. Further, theve was not
cta solid science of positive youth development. The restlt was
8 regression to primitive icleas of treating kids with problems as
either evil or “erizy.”
Modern society likes to think of itself as civilized, beyond the
has showa,
primitive thinking of the past, but as Chapter On
deficit-based thinking, punishment, incarceration, medication,
and coercion are still the most common approaches to kids in
pain. In fact. in some ways, the past seems more progressive
than the present.
Reclaiming Through Reparenting
What will take to turn the Ude? Sweeping change—the kind
Finland recently underwent by closing gutagelike youth prisons
and replacing them with innovative treatment and strength-
based programs. They exchanged amed emards with caring
parent-like staff, and it has worked.
Thirty years ago. Finiand hucl one of the highest rates of inca:
ceration in all of Europe. ‘Today they have the lowest, just 52. per
100,000 people. The United States leads the world at 702 per
100,060, and Russia follows at 664 per 100,060. What is the
seeret of Finland's revolution? The head of a juvenile facility
near Helsinkt sums it up like this: “We are parents, that’s what
we are, And theyIn depersonalized American schools and institu ions, close con-
nections of adults with kids are suspect. But impersonal disei- 43
pline des not create transformational change. Kids need
connections with supportive adults to tum around their lives, In
British schools this is calted “pastoral care,” which means ereat-
inga crete of adults who operate in loco parentis (in the place of
the parent).
Reparenting clues not infer replacing biological parents. [n fact,
as we've already discussed, a child’s parents or legal guardians
should be warmly welcomed by those who work with troubled
Kids, Instead, reparenting represents being intentional abont
connecting to our kids. It reminds youth earegivers to model
themselves after the ultimate caregiver of any young person, the
paren
The Circle of Courage Model of Family
The principles of resilience we focus on in the latter ball ofthis
book—trust, talent, power, and purpose—are based on the:
Circle of Courage.” Family is essential to the Circle of ‘Courage
model of resilience, Larry Brendtro, Martin Brokenleg, ancl
Steve Van Bockern created this model by blending resilience
research with time-honored principles of child-rearing in tribal
cultures and the writings of early pioneers in education and
youth work,
The Girele of Courage (portrayed by Lakota artist George Blue
Bird in Figure 2, page 44) identifies four wniversal needs for chile
dren: belonging, mastery. independence, and generosity: When
the Cirele of Courage isin halance, children develop their
strengths and experience positive life outcomes.
Chapter Two The Road to Resieree44
The Resillence Revolution
Figure 2
ce
The Circle of Courage”
Generosity
Independence Betonging
Mastery
° Crele of Courage Used with permission.
Keeping the circle in balance requires protective external fie=
tors: the support of family andl commumit
What constitutes “family” is much broader in the Circle of
Courage than in the standard Western sense. Par renting is not
Timited to biological parents in the Circle of Courage. Indeed,
throughout human histors; the young, were murtured by extended
fanilies, not just one or two individuals, In Native American and
other tribal cultures around the world, the family tnit still
encompasses upward of three hundred people: As Martin
Brokenleg puts it, “Al! of my relatives” yrandpavents are my
grandparents, aud all of my relatives’ grandchildren are my
grandchildren,”
The nuclear family is relatively recent invention of Western
civilization. Orphanages are nonexistent in tribal society; there,
as the maxim suggests, it really does take a village to raise a
child, even and especially in the absence of iological parents. Tn
Wester society, however, once the nuclear family is broken, the
circle is also broken, and a host of problems emerge. Without thesupport of family and community to meet their basie needs, chil-
dren find it much more difficult to develop res
fence,
The Principles of Resilience
Many caregivers are drawn to working with troubled kids:
because of their own traumatic experience oy a simple clesire to
help, but over time, stress can eut way at that inspired initial
optimism, How can the educators and youth workers of our ime
restore their inner convietion that positive change is possible?
In one sense, we must believe in ourselves, in exch individual's
ubility to affect another's life for the better. We must also beliove
in youth's capacity, with our help, to grow beyond the limits of a
traumatic past or a risk-filled environment: We must believe in
resilience.
fn our work, we outline how elucators and caregivers eur help
troubled kids develop resilience by meeting the four basic emo-
Honal needs defined hy research and the Circle of Courage
model
+ To satisfy the need for belonging, build trust.
the need for mastery, recognize talent.
+ Tosatisfy the need for independence, promote power
+ Tosatisfy the need for generosity, instill purpose.
We believe this rejuvenating approach meets important needs
for adults, too; se all need resitience ins the difteull work of rais-
ing healthy kids,
Research Modets
‘The Citele of Courage’s central tenets of helonging, mastery,
independence, and generosity paraile! an important carly study
on self-worth in children by Stanley Coopersmith. He found that
childsen build a sense of self-worth on the four foundations of sige
nificance, competence, power, and virtue, as shown in Figure 3
45
Chaptar Two The Road to Resilience46
The Resitience Revolution
owe 3
fee
Circle of Courage Self-Worth Research:
Belonging develops thiought Siguificanice i the Belief that F
opportunities te build trust and . am important to somebody,
form human aétachrient,
Mastery requires opportunitis'to, Competence isthe belief that £
develop talent and meet goals for am able to solve prablems,
achievement,
Independence is fostered by Power isthe belief that Zon in
‘opportunities to grow in responsi- charge of my life,
tity and autonomy,
Generosity offers opportunities to Virtue is the belief that My Ue has
be of value to others trough acts. purpase,
ef respoct and altruism,
Sa
In the decades following Coopersmith’s classic studs, the emerge
ing science of resilience reinforces his findings with similar
terms for the same concepts, A review of hundreds of studies by
Bonnie Benard snagests that resilience is related to four factors:
social competence, problem-solving, autonomy, and a sense of
purpose."
Additionally, the Search Institute studied hundreds of thousands
of children and youth across North America. They identified
forty developmental assets that lead to healthy outeomes and
huild resilience.” Halfof these are interna! assets, such as
responsibility, achievement motivation, and interpersonal com
petence, The other twenty assets are external assets like family
support, positive peer influence, and earing school elimates,
Faure 4, The Resilience Code (pages 1819), summarizes find-
ings from three other major stuclies of resilience. Feedevte Flach
studied resilience in psychotherapy patients; Emmy Werner and
Rath Smith followed’ highcrisk Hlawnitan children from child
hhood to maturity; und Steven and Sybil Wolin studied resibient
vouth who overcame highly troubled family backgrounds.” The
results of this muss of research ean be simplified into hasie ente-
kortes of trust talent, power, and purposeThese detailed findings are consistent with each other and with
the hroad themes of the Circle of Courage as well. Of course,
pevple are not machines. There is no guarantee that x + y ==.
But while we can't control the auteomies of young lives, we have
more influence than we often realize, Studies consistently show
that young people who possess « high number of developmental
assets generally turn out well. Those with feos assets exhibit
niany high-risk behaviors, stich as sehool failure, substance
abnse, reckless sexuality, emotional problems, and delinquency.
Why cle such varied studies reach such similar conclusions? All
identify the nniversal human needs that underlie positive growth
and development. When growth needs are met, these strengths
abually develop.
resilient person is able to fornt social bonds, solve problems,
exercise self-control, and contribute to others, But these are not
inst abilities: They ure needs present in all children. They are
jrard-wired into the human brain, and they’ are essential (6 sur-
vival and well-being, We define pain not only by the presence of
soine traunatic experience, but also by the frustration of baste
growth needs.
Satisfying the Need for Belonging: Building Trust
Every person possesses fimeamental need to belong. This
need is best met by frequent positive interactions with at Teast a
few persons who share mutual concer. While rejection pro-
dees shane—one of the most painful af human emotions—
belonging creates positive feclings wud contributes substantially
to healthy seitesteein
Recent studies inclicate that the humin brain even contains an
area for reading emotions on the face, ar area distinct Fram that
devoted to the perception of inanimate objects.** Laughter and
smiling are among the most powerful soeial bonding,
mechanisms.” As mentioned in Chapter One. tit-for-tat is trie for
positive responses as well as fearfal or angey ones. When the
amygdala reads emations as positive, we send a positive response.
From early childhood, we have an innate ability to read visual and
auclitory cues that tell ws whether sameoue is friend or foe.
47
Chapter Tho the Road to Rosier08
The Resitfence Revolution
Faw 4
ee
The Resilience Code
‘Trust (Belonging) Talent (Mastery)
Flach | Anetwatk of fiends: ¢ com- | Creativity, apen-mndedness,
munity where one is respect eceptivity to new ideas; 3
ed; bonded through tumor | wide ‘range of intandsts; sal
‘eceagnition of ones gifts
ang talents; wilngness
dresin Ainge sole
ions to meet goals; redefine
ing assumations and
problems to Find solutions
Weimer & | Coring'and attentive femily | High expectations; academic
Smith | environments: if patents are “| suecess; communication
absent or inattentive, sialls
extended family, siblings,
‘and other adults provide .
counsel, safety. and supports |.
participation in schot and
community prageams.
Wolin & | Relationships; bonded Insight, inibative, creative
Wolin | though humor intimate | ty: taking om demanding
and fulfilling ties to others | tacks; asking tough ques
‘ions and giving onest
answers; bringing order and
purpose to chaos
eee
Observe a cluster of teens and notice how smailes and peuls of
Ihughter continually punctuate their interactions. Laughter is an
auditory signal for bonding, and smiling is the visual equivalent."
{deally, children meet their need for belonging with a eating.
relationship to a parent. This forims a basis for kiter attachments
to other adults, peers, texchers, and for parenting the next gener-
ation of childven,
Humans are remarkably resilient, and when a hasic attachment is
broken, they are able to reach oul to others for substitute helonge
ings. Sometimes this creates problems, as when a gang replacesFaure 4 (continued)
The Resilience Code
Power: (indefiendence)
‘Aatonomy; independence: of
thought and action; pevson-
al discipline and responsibil
ity insight Sto one's cin
feelings: high tolerance of
dtoss distancing of one=
seif fom desttive rela-
Hanshize
Personal effleacy; cantat
‘over one’s eoviranment
Independence; keeping
boundaries and emotional
distance from troubled per
sons; initiative, taking
charge of problems: exerting
contrel
49
Purpose (Generosity)
‘night into the foetings of
thers, Nope: conamftment;
‘the search formeanfig or
ulspose; Faith; 2 sense of
destiny
Empatiy, caring: productive
roles in family and commmu-
nity
Relationships of empathy:
rapacity to give; moral
vith an informed conscience;
ability to judge right from
‘wrong; valuing decency,
compassion, honesty, fair
ley; responding to needs
ad suffering of others
family. But strong bonds to a teacher or mentor ean also pro-
foundlly inftuence young, persons who do net have stuble attuch-
uents in their families
Satisfying the Need for Mastery: Nurturing Talent
A.core motivation behind much human hehavior is the quest to
become competent. Children accpuire a mass of knowledge,
including an entire language code, without formal instruction.
‘The ability to bring all one’
and mect goals through capitalizing on strengths and overcoming
's knowledge together to solve problems
‘Chapter Two The Road to ResienceThe Resilience Revolution
limitations is substantially tho definition of intelligence* But
this ability cun only crystallize with the support of adult mentors
or more skill peers.”
Research on inielligence has progressed beyond marrow verbat
and computational skills to include practical, social, and emo-
tional intelligence. Interestingly; there is little eonnection
between many of these talents aud formal test scores. In fact,
turning schools into test-prep centers actually stifles learning,
says our colleague Linda Lntieri, As Stanley Greenspan has
observed, “Letting children know how dumb they are doesn't
contribute in any way to making them smart.”
In its broadest sense, mastery is practical intelligence. It is meet-
{ng inmportant life goals by developing strengths and overcoming
difficulties. Adults can encourage mastery hy tapping the hidden
talents in every youngster and giving every child the skills to
creatively solve problems.
Satisfying the Need for Independence: Promoting Power
‘The biggest developmental change as youth approach adoles-
cence is « heightened desire for autonomy: This sparks conflict
swith adults who still expect youth to act as submissive childven.
Many behaviors that irritate adults are landmarks on the roxd to
independence.
Children test their strength with loudness and physical horse-
play: Teens show bravado and risk-taking anel push the limits af
adult control, Ruie-breaking becomes a practice run at inde-
pendence. In the ensning power strugsles, youth seek independ-
cence, while adults seck control. What youth need more than
restrictions are prosocial outlets for their growing. need to feel
powerful in their own lives and in control of their destinies.
Independent childven are not disconnected from attachment to
others. In fact, chiklren who are securely’ attached are best able
to develop personal power: Powerful young people feel secure
enough to ask for help from caring aclults, hut also can make
their own informed decisious and set the course af their life
pathways. They exercise self-control over their emotions, resistnegative influence from others, and act with responsibility: They
are the pilots of their lives, rather than passengers.
Satisfying the Need for Generosity: Instilling Purpose
Por decades, the field of psychology operated as if all human
behavior was selfishly motivated, but a significant body of
research on altruism shows that concern for others is central to
fhuman nature and is foundational far moral development.”
Altruism has been deseribed as empathy in action.”
We once asked teens in a detention center if they had any hopes or
dreams for their fature. One boy responded, "No. That's why:
we've here.” Kurt Haln, founder of Outward Bound, noted that
‘many modern youth suffer from the “misery of unitoportance” and
Jong to he used in sone demanding cause. To find meaning in life,
Wwe must commit to a purpose heyond preoccupation with self.
When we have done a good job as enregivers, the youth we care
{for cxn become caregivers themselves, and the Circle of Courage
is complete.
The remaining chapters present practical, in-depth models for
cultivating the principles of resilience in troubled kids nnd in
ourselves.
Endnotes
* Cano [1868] 2002, 53.
Benard 2004. 8
9 Wala 1998,
4 Werner 1895.
Werner and Srnith 1992,
"O'Connor, Ruttes and English and Romanian Adoptoes Study Team
2000.
"The most widely ased system lor labeling mental health problems is
the Diggnostle and Statistical Mfarwal of Mental Disorders (DSM
oF
‘Chapter Two Tho Rood to Resiionce