Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
! To understand how we
might have arrived at this
complex understanding
of humanity and our
place in the natural
environment, we need
to think a little more
about what we mean by
the seemingly simple
term nature.
nature
! As weve discussed in
previous weeks, this is a
dualistic understanding of
nature.
! Often referred to as a
nature/human or nature/
culture dualism.
Why divide up the world like this?
! The first and most fundamental feature of the
modern idea of nature is a sharp dichotomy between
man and nature a dichotomy that is all the more
radical because it is a feature of both wellsprings of
the Western intellectual heritage. In the first book of
the Bible, alone among all the other creatures, God
makes man in His own image, giving him dominion
over and charging him to subdue the earth and all its
denizens. In ancient Greek philosophy, man is set
apart from nature because he alone among the
animals is supposed to be rational. In the late
medieval and early modern periods, thinkers as
different from one another as Thomas Aquinas and
Rene Descartes synthesized these two strands of
thought, the Judeo-Christian and Greco- Callicott, J. Baird (1992)
Roman. Thus the man/nature dualism in each La nature est morte,
augmented the other. And Descartes' contemporary, vive la nature! Hastings
Francis Bacon, set the modern agenda for the
scientific conquest of nature by man. If we can Center Report 22.
discover the working principles the divinely
ordained laws of nature, he presciently pointed out,
we can bend it to our will.
Why divide up the world like this?
! The idea that human life takes place in a self-
enclosed, completely humanized space that is
somehow independent of an inessential sphere
of nature which exists in a remote space
somewhere else might be seen as the
foundational delusion of the West. A
dangerous doctrine, strongly implicated in the
environmental crisis, this framework of self-
enclosure is the love-child of the old
dominant narrative of human mastery
and centrality mated with the much younger
circumstance of human experience of
commodification in the global city.
Plumwood,Val (2001) Nature as Agency and the Prospects for a Progressive
Naturalism Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 12(4), p. 26
nature
! Nature as essence
it is in the lions nature to hunt gazelles
! Nature as nonhuman
lions belong in nature, not in the zoo
! According to some
scholars, we have
already witnessed the
end of nature.
! After the greenhouse
effect, acid rain, and the
depletion of the ozone
layer there is no nature
left.
Diminishing nature
! When we understand
nature as, by definition,
the nonhuman world,
humans are
unavoidably positioned
as damaging to nature.
! Wherever we are,
however we are living, we
cant help but reduce and
diminish natures
naturalness just by
being there.
Rolston: nature and culture
! If I am hiking across the Lamar Valley,
the birds and their nests are natural;
but if I come upon an abandoned
boot, this is unnatural [or cultural].
! Humans evolved out of nature; our
bio-chemistries are natural. We too
have genes and inborn traits. But
human life is radically different from
that in wild nature. Unlike coyotes or
bats, humans are not just what they are
by nature; we come into the world by
nature quite unfinished and become
what we become by culture. Humans
deliberately rebuild the wild
environment.
Rolston Natural and Unnatural
Making decisions
! The idea that there is a fundamental
difference between humans and the rest
of nature has often been argued for on
the grounds that humans are unique in
our possession of a rational mind.
! This rationality allows us to reflect on
the world around us, and make
deliberate decisions about how we
will act.
! Unlike other animals, we are able to
decide if we will follow our own natural
drives/instincts.
! And so, it is we alone that have the
power to transform and control nature.
All others live within it.
Stepping outside nature
! Over the years, this position outside nature
has been variously celebrated and mourned.
! Enlightenment philosophers celebrated
the progressive ability of humans to liberate
themselves from nature and dictate the
conditions of our own lives and societies.
Ingold, T. 2000. "Making things, growing plants, raising animals and bringing up children." in The
Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London & New York: Routledge.
A provocative idea
Callicott, J. B. (1992). "La nature est morte, vive la nature!" Hastings Center Report 22(5).
Which change is good change?
Callicott, J. B. (1992). "La nature est morte, vive la nature!" Hastings Center Report
22(5).
Maximising biodiversity
! Others have argued that we ought to
focus on maximising biodiversity in
ecosystems.
! Rather than assuming changes
brought about by people are bad and
undisturbed wilderness is good, we
should ask which environment
supports the greatest range of local
biodiversity.
! In this way we might distinguish
between different kinds of human
activities/impacts: a mine in a
national park is a bad thing, while a
program to cull over abundant Sarkar S. (1999) Wilderness
kangaroos might be a good thing. preservation and biodiversity
conservation. Bioscience 49:
404-412.
Why does it matter?
http://www.vhemt.org
Obligations and Dependency
Plumwood also gives us another reason to think that dualistic
understandings of nature are problematic. Put simply, that this
understanding leaves us with two important and dangerous
cultural blind spots:
1. Failure to see nonhumans in ethical terms: A dualised notion of
nature prevents us from understanding our obligations to
the rest of the world, to be part of the food chain, for
example.
2. Failure to see ourselves in biological terms: A dualised notion of
nature also blinds us to our dependency on the rest of the
world (denied dependency), to the fact that our lives are
only possible because of the broader more-than-human
world that sustains us.
! And so, she argued that this nature/human dualism and the
consequent failure to understand our broader obligations and
dependency is a core part of our current ecological crisis.
2.) A sustainable place for humans in
nature
! And so, we need non-dualised ways
of understanding the world that
allow human to have an impact, but
that pay attention to the very real
differences between various
human ways of using and valuing the
natural world. Which of these ways of
living are most sustainable.
(supporting biodiversity, ecosystems
health, etc).
! At the same time, we need to re-
imagine ourselves as beings who are
dependent on, and have
obligations to, the wider world of
nature (a world that includes
people).
Essays
! You will get your marks back for essay one at the end of
the week.
! The questions for the second essay are available through
Moodle.
! In tutorials this week we will be looking at essay 2 and
the readings on Nature. You will also have time to work
on your group project.
! Next week in tutorials we will discuss tips for improving
your writing for essay 2.
CREATIVE INTERVENTION: CHANGING BURIAL PRACTICES
https://www.ted.com/talks/jae_rhim_lee?language=en#t-274151
COMPOST
! Corresponding mortuary symbolisms
and grave practices might aim to nourish
rather than exclude other life forms,
affirming rather than demonising our
transition to the non-human in death.
(Val Plumwood 2008, 74-75)