The faith of each and every citizen has been demolished.
The constitution which
have made supreme court cannot be above its mother. Every one must have the right to say the truth and in no way that can be called contempt of court. Time has come when use of contempt be restricted, almost all if not all issues can be handled without contempt, judges too are one of us and they too can have difference of opinions. Tell me at any time the higher judiciary has not tugged its collar while using contempt, contempt gives them ego rather than tool for ensuring justice.Let me tell you what fear is circulating these days .... 1. Is there democracy in judiciary means can anyone say what he thinks right, no. Give them freedom of tenure only if you think he is God not even second. They sit and at their discretion dispose the cases. No matter how many cases are pending, no matter why they have been given employment and money for doing arbitration, no matter what the people have been believing about the surity of justice. let me tell you a case. a case was filed in high court with a sheer motive to harass officials and that too before a nonsense judge, i bet an illiterate man will give a better judgement than what he gives in any of the cases.He has been harassing official not for doing and giving a chance to do duty but forcing personal appearnce or be ready for contempt of court, u know why because the motive is not to do justice but to teach a lesson what a judge can do to an executive. i tell you why he is not giving any final verdict because he is enjoying the daily nonsense questions he ask in coutroom,once the case is decided it will go out of his hand to others and he will not do so. 2. if your phone rings it is contempt of court, should there not be jammer 3. if you are not obliging by greeting, he can force you to arrest, is judiciary a new religion 4. if you hit by mistake a judge, be sure to land in jail or at his mercy should not he be better in a courtroom where he cannot see anyone in a close box. 5. if you are a female u may be a peon, or mazdoor if a judge ask you for a lusty service and you deny be sure to be fired, should not we all females should surrender to judge for his mercy 6. is parliament not above executive, judiciary,and legislative itself, then leave the matter to parliament and in name of granting freedom of tenure do not make impeachment so difficult. do we impeach a prime minister, a cabinet secretary similar democracy be maintained for all except for the highest authority of its field. what do you think senior are better masters, isn't it better to give contempt of court to lower courts. They will do sometimes good many times bad, why difference is there at higher judiciary. sad to say i don't know whether karnan is right or not, but if we don't hear his voice do we ever have whistleblower who will stand for truth looking what karnan had been through. supreme court can't punish karnan as he himself is part of the same system that has led other apex judiciary judges through there, as all are part of corrupt, full of nepotism and opaque piece of collegium system. we need a different judiciary where justice is sought and given not where justice is proven by judiciary itself.