Year 7 Assessment Rubric

Name:

Teachers: Mr. Baek, Mr. Copus, Ms Walls, Ms Lee, Mr. Lee, Mr. Moore,
& Ms Turner

Date assigned: Week of November 21, 2016

Date due: SAP Week 1 (November 28th, 2016)

This task assesses Criteria A & B

Criterion Assessment Descriptors Mark

ANALYSING

The student:
i. provides perceptive analysis of the content, context, language, structure, technique and style and
A explains relationship among texts thoroughly
ii. provides perceptive identification and explanation of the effects of the creators choice on an audience
iii. gives detailed justification of opinions and ideas with a range of examples, and thorough /8
explanations; uses accurate terminology
iv. perceptively compares and contrasts features within and between genres and texts.

ORGANISING

The student:
B i. makes sophisticated use of organizational structures that serve the context and intention effectively
ii. effectively organizes opinions and ideas in a coherent and logical manner with ideas building on each
other in a sophisticated way
/8

(Total) Level Achieved

MYP English Language and Literature: Task Specific Rubric (Year 7)

Unit 2: What a Character!

Assessment Task:

You will read two extracts from Roald Dalhs Boy

You will be asked to analyze the characters and the situation
You will have to respond to the questions using short answer and extended answer in P.E.E. style
You will be assessed on your understanding (A)
You will be assessed on how you organize your answers (B)
Make sure you read the extracts carefully and plan your answers with consideration
 Criterion A: Analysing 0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8

Your analysis of the content, context, Work not Limited Adequate Competent Perceptive
language, structure, technique and style attempted
and explanation of the relationship
among texts is

Your analysis of the effects of creators Work not Limited Adequate Competent Perceptive
choices on the audience is attempted

You justify opinions and ideas with Work not Rarely Sometimes or Sufficiently Thoroughly
examples and explanations. attempted Inconsistently and in detail
and with a
range
Terminology is used Work not Little or not at Sometimes Accurately Accurately
attempted all
You compare and contrast Work not Minimally Sometimes Well Perceptively
attempted
Criterion B: Organising 0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8

Your use of organizational structures to Work not Minimal / Not Adequate Competent Sophisticate
serve the context and intention is attempted always d and
appropriate Effective
Your ability to organise ideas in a Work not Minimal Sometimes Evident: Effective:
coherent and logical manner is attempted evident ideas build on ideas build on
each other each other in a
sophisticated
way