Page 1 of 5

(Aaron) replied: "O son of my mother! Seize (me) not by my beard nor by my head! Truly I feared lest
thou shouldst say, Thou has caused a division among the children of Israel, and thou didst not respect
my word!"
;

TA: HA:

There are several questions in regard to this verse.

These are in regard to the acts of Prophets.

1]The question is whether Saiyiduna: Mu:sa did seize the beard and head of Saiyiduna Ha:ru:n or he did
not seize them and this is just a Metaphor or a Figure.

If Ali: Mirza: takes the verse as a Metaphor or a Figure then he must state the principles of discarding
the literal meaning in favour of Metaphorical of Figurative meaning. Otherwise he is unable to take the
verse otherwise the literal meaning.

2]If he accepts that Holy Prophet Mu:sa: AS did as the verse saith in Literal meaning then the questions
are:

Were these acts of Saiyiduna: Mu:sa: AS correct or they were wrong?

If they were correct acts then this implies that Saiyiduna: Ha:ru:n did commit an Error. Is this Error is of
Ijtiha:d or this was not by Ijtiha:d. If not by Ijtiha:d then was it a transgression or it was by Vah:y?

2] If Saiyiduna: Ha:ru:n was correct then this implies that both of the acts of Saiyiduna: Mu:sa: were
incorrect and wrong.

So this implies that the act of Saiyiduna: Mu:sa: was based on Ijtiha:d. In this case this implies an error
of Ijtiha:d to Saiyiduna: Musa:

2] If Saiyiduna: Mu:sa: was correct then this implies that both of the act of Saiyiduna: Ha:ru:n AS was
incorrect and wrong.

So this implies that the act of Saiyiduna: Ha:ru:n was based on Ijtiha:d. In this case this implies an error
of Ijtiha:d to Saiyiduna: Haru:n.

Engineer Ali: Mirza: Must have to reply the nature of the act of each prophet
stated above.

Page | 1
 Page 2 of 5

If he is unable to decide then it is very clear that he is an apostate who has no rules and no principle.

If Ijtiha:d of two Prophets can differ then why the ijtiha:d of S:ah:abah cannot differ?

This shews that not only Zubair Ali: Zai but his telephonic and telepathic student of Jhelum as well,both
were/are in error in regard to the Nature of jtiha:d.

Additionally this shews that even Prophets could dispute with one another . But none of them is to be
accused. This is a proof that even the Divine Essence Doeth not accuse on the Errors of ijtiha:d.

If Ali Mirza saiththat both of them were correct then he had to accept plurality of truths. Plurality of
Truths can only be in the case each one of the truths is relative and non of them is absolute.

POINTS TO BE NOTED:=
1]Prophet could not do any act which imply Non Existence of As:mah.

2] S:ah:abah could not do any act which imply Non Existence of Ada:lah.

So any act ascribed to any Prophet if is against As:mah must necessarily be interpreted in the case the
Text is reliable , and the text shall be discarded if it is not reliable.Similarly any act ascribed to any
S:ah:a:bi if is against Ada:lah must necessarily be interpreted in the case the Text is reliable , and the
text shall be discarded if it is not reliable.

Neither a Prophet nor a S:h:a:bi can be criticized for an error in Ijtiha:d.

The Ijtiha:d of Nabi and the Ijtiha:d of S:ah:a:bi need not to follow the rules and principles established
by F-qha: .

We have given the example of a dispute between two Prophets ,each one of the two was a Mas:u:m
[Infallible and Innocent]. Yet they not only disputed but quarreled on a n issue of Ijtiha:d. But none of
them can be condemned. The same is true in case of S:h:a:bah and then for Muh:addith:i:n and F-qha:.

In the dispute none of the disputers are condemn IF it is a Dispute Of Ijtiha:d.

But like all Rava:fid: and those who have Ra:fid:i: Tendencies consider the Errors of Ijtiha:d of S:ah:abah
as Transgressive Errors or Errors of Transgrassion [Naudh:uBillah and Astagh:farullah].

POWER OF IJTIH:AD
If an Ijtiha:d is incorrect even then it is Neither a Sin Nor a Transgression, even it is apparently close to
an act of Transgression of Law. These Ra:fid:i: minded people terms such Errors of ijtiha:d a Kh:at:aya:
Munkirah [Errors of Transgression].

So they are exposed from their tendencies.

Page | 2
 Page 3 of 5

Family of Mirza has Rafid:i: Tendencies, and this does shew that son of Mirza: Family namely Ali: Mirza
did have the Rafid:i: tendencies when he was a Barailvi and when he became Ahlussunnah Deoband he
did have the same tendencies. These tendencies urged him to become Ith:naAshri. Then he met
people like ish:aq Jhal etc. and he followed them Finally he came to simple minded Zubair Ali: Zai .

But regular students of Semi Ahlul H:adi:th: Zubair did recognized Ali Mirza as a deceiver. So they
warned him. Finally Engineer was discarded from his circle.So he found his own circle. A cunning student
of a simple minded did try to put his own word in the mouth of his teacher. But even a simple minded
person did discover this scheme and discarded him from being his student.

A PROOF
A CERTAIN PROOF OF RA:FID:IYAH OF THESE
PERSONS IS THAT THEY ASCRIBE KH:AT:A:YA
MUNK-RAH TO SOME OF THE S:AH:ABAH AND
DO NOT ASCRIBE EVEN KH:AT:A:YAH
IJTIHA:DIAH TO THOSE S:AH:A:BAH WHO ARE
SUPPORTED BY RAFID:IYAH.
Even Engineer Ali: Mirza does ascribe errors to
Saiyiduna: Uth:ma:n RD: and does not ascribe
errors to Saiyiduna: Ali: . According to him to
ascribe Errors of Ijtiha:d to Saiyiduna Ali: is

Page | 3
 Page 4 of 5

Na:s:ibiah [Tanas:s:um] but to ascribe errors to

Saiyiduna: Uth:ma:n is Not Ra:fid:iyah.
This is the proof that This Engineer is an
extreme case of Ra:fid:ism.
A CHALLANCE
At any rate we challenge Engineer Ali Mirza to
Explain the above verse of Holy Qura:n Su:rah
T:aha: according to his own principles if he has
some.
A REQUEST TO THE FOLLOWERS OF THE
ENGINEER OF JHELUM
Will you still follow the this heretic?
Do you still need some evidences that he is a
Rafid:i: who is trying to destroy the credibility
of S:ah:abah in your hearts?

Page | 4
 Page 5 of 5

How many proofs and evidences do you need

to be convinced that Engineer is not the
Brother of You but the brother of Rava:fid:
[Akh:ur Rava:fid:]?
For sake of ALL=H,HIS RASU:L,HOLY QURAN,
AH:ADI:TH: AND S:AH:A:BAH PLEASE DO NOT
LISTENT TO THIS PERSON UNLESS AND
OTHERWISE YOU HAVE FULL KNOWLEDGE TO
DETECT HIS CONSPERACY SCHEMES BEHIND HIS
LECTURES.

Page | 5