Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Presentado por
por:: Ciro Parente
Martin Brusa
HSB Global Standards
Prefacio
1
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
2
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
3
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
4
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Reply: Yes.
10
5
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
11
6
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
13
7
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
15
16
8
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
17
18
9
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
19
20
10
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
El usuario debe solicitar que el Reporte de Datos del Fabricante indique que la proteccion
por sobrepresion esta provista mediante el diseo del sistema por UG-140(b), cuando
ningun dispositivo de alivio de presion que cumpla con UG-125 hasta UG-138 va a ser
instalado.
El texto en rojo
j indica la revision.
Un pedido de interpretacion ha sido publicado en este
sentido.
21
22
11
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
23
24
12
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
25
UW-27(a)(2) Inclusion
de la soldadura por
friccion (FSW) como un
procedimiento de
soldadura aceptado
No hay restricciones con los
materiales en los que este
proceso puede ser usados
Casos 2593-1 y 2677
siguen activos
La Section IX ha adoptado
reglas para FSW en la
Edicion 2013
26
13
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Question: Is it the intent of Section VIII, Division 1 that the Manufacturer of a formed
head, fabricated by welding separate segments into a single head which have been
formed to the proper curvature by spinning, is permitted to close the spin holes within
each segment under the provisions of UW UW-34?
34?
Reply: Yes.
27
28
14
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
29
30
15
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
31
32
16
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
33
34
17
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
35
36
18
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Se agrega UW-40(f)(5)(h)
UW-40(f)(5)(h) the thickness of the weld metal overlay when weld metal
overlay is the only welding applied.
37
38
19
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
39
40
20
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
42
21
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
43
44
22
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Apendice 1, 1-7
Las reglas en 1-7 tienen en cuenta aberturas grandes en
cuerpos cilindricos y conicos. Aunque no esta explicitamente
indicado, estas reglas son aplicables para recipientes sijetos a
presion interna y externa. Para aclararlo, la palabra "internal
fuer borrada del parrafo 1-7(b)(3), y la definicion de P
[ P = internal or external pressure ] fue aggredada a la
Nomenclatura en 1-7(b)(5).
45
VIII-1-07-52
Question: And satisfying the provisions of 2-14
2 14 for flange rigidity
rigidity, shall the rigidity index
be determined for both the gasket seating and operating conditions in order to establish
the governing case?
Reply: Yes
46
23
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
47
48
24
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
49
50
25
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
51
52
26
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
53
54
27
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
55
Interpretacion aprobada
56
28
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Parte 4, 4.1.3.2,
4.1.5.1 Definicion de espesor de diseo corregida para incluir
la corrosion admisible
57
58
29
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
59
60
30
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
61
62
31
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
63
PREGUNTAS?
32
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Caso 2726
Seccion VIII, Division 1
Prueba Hidrostatica y Neumatica de Recipientes
Producidos en Masa con una Valvula Intermedia entre el
Manometro y el Recipiente a Presion
Provee reglas alternativas a UG-102(a)
Restringido para construccion de recipientes producidos en
masa [UG-90(c)(2) y Apendice 35]
Se requiere un procedimiento o controles en la operacion de la
valvula para asegurar que esa valvula se mantiene abierta
completamente
l t t durante
d t la
l prueba.
b
66
33
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Caso 2730
Seccion VIII, Division 2
Tensiones Admisibles e Intensidad de la Tension de
Diseo para esparragos listados en ambas Tablas 3 y 4
de la Seccion II Parte D
Tensiones en esparragos de Tabla 3 deben ser usadas en la
Parte 4.16 DBR (Diseo por Regla)
Tensiones en esparragos de Tabla 4 deben ser usadas en la
Parte 5 DBA (Diseo por Analisis)
Las tensiones admisibles de Tabla 4 deberian ser > que las
t
tensiones
i d lla Tabla
de T bl 3
Se encontraron diferencias, temporariamente se soluciona con
el Caso 2730 que permite el uso de las tensiones admisibles de
la Tabla 3 para bridas designadas segun la Parte 5
67
INTERPRETACIONES RECIENTES
34
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Interpretacion VIII
VIII--1-10-
10-41
NOTA Algunos
NOTA: Al F bi
Fabricantes
t encontraron
t que no pudieron
di prevenir
i perdidas
did
de bridas de gran tamao durante la prueba hidrostatica. Una revision de la
rigidez de la brida durante la prueba hidrostatica, encuentra rotaciones que
exceden los limites recomendados en 2-14.
69
Interpretacion VIII
VIII--1-10-
10-42
70
35
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Interpretacion VIII
VIII--1-10-
10-44
71
Interpretacion VIII
VIII--1-10-
10-47
Subject: UG-99(e), Maximum Allowable External Pressure (2010 Edition, 2011
Addenda)
Date Issued: Januaryy 27,, 2012
File No.: 11-1606
Question: In accordance with the provisions of UG-99(e)(1), when pressure
chambers of combination units have been designed to operate independently
and be hydrostatically tested as separate vessels (each chamber tested without
pressure in the adjacent chamber), is it permitted by the rules of ASME Section
VIII, Division 1 that the hydrostatic test pressure in one chamber acting as
external pressure on the common element may exceed the maximum allowable
external pressure of such common element?
Reply: Yes.
Yes
72
36
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Interpretacion VIII
VIII--1-10-
10-53
73
Reply: No.
74
37
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
75
76
38
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Fig. UG-
UG-118 Revisada
NOTE:
(1) The maximum allowable working pressure
(external) is required only when specified as a
design condition.
(2) For cases where the MAWP (internal) and
MAWP (external)
( t l) values
l have
h the
th same designated
d i t d
coincident temperature, then the values may be
combined on an single line as follows:
77
78
39
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
79
80
40
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Caso 2732
81
Revision a UW-
UW-19(a)(2)
82
41
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Figs. UCS-
UCS-61.1 & UCS-
UCS-66.2
83
84
42
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Interpretacion VIII
VIII--1-01-
01-130
Interpretation: VIII-1-01-130
S bj t Section VIII
Subject: VIII, Division 1 (2001 Edition); UCS
UCS-68
68
Date Issued: December 3, 2002
File: BC02-2793
Question: When an entire vessel is postweld heat-treated
and at least one weld joint requires PWHT per Code rules,
may individual weld joints that did not require PWHT per
Code rules be permitted to use to provision of UCS-68(c)?
Reply: Yes.
85
Interpretacion on UG-
UG-140(b)
Reply: Yes.
86
43
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
87
88
44
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Tabla UHA-
UHA-32
89
90
45
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Interpretacion VIII
VIII--1-83-
83-192
Subject: Section VIII-1, UCL-34 and PWHT of Weld Overlaid Tubesheets
Date Issued: December 21, 1983
File: BC82-655
Question (1): Is it required under the provisions of Section VIII, Division 1, UCL-34, to
postweld heat treat as a result of overlaying a P-No. 1 Group No. 2 tubesheet, 15 in.
thick, which has one surface completely weld overlaid with a 5/8 in. thick layer of P-No. 8
composition weld metal?
Reply (1): No.
Question (2): Same as Question (1), except that the weld overlay is 3/16 in. thick?
Reply (2): No.
Question (3): Same as Question (1), except that the tubesheet material is P-No. 5 Group
No. 1?
Reply (3): Yes. UCS-56 and Table UCS-56 apply, and the minimum holding time is based
on the weld overlay thickness.
91
92
46
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
93
UCS-68(c)
UCS-
MDMT < -55F
94
47
ASME B&PV Code - 2013 Edition Revisions
Section VIII, Divisions 1 & 2
Question (1): A WPS is qualified with impact testing for joining P-No. 1, Groups 1, 2
or 3 materials to themselves in the PWHT condition. The PQR impact test
p
specimens received a simulated heat treatment meeting g the requirements
q of
3.10.2.3(b). A production weld deposited using this WPS receives PWHT meeting
the requirements of 6.4.2.2.(e)(9) at a reduced holding temperature for a longer
holding time. Is it the intent of the last sentence of 3.11.8.1(b) to permit the qualified
WPS to be acceptable for the production welding and heat treatment conditions
without requalification of the WPS by impact testing of test specimens subjected to
the alternative heat treatment conditions used in production?
Reply (1): Yes
Question (2): Is it the intent of the last sentence of 3.11.8.1 to waive production
impact
p testing
g required
q byy 3.11.8.4(a)
( ) for fabrication welds in P-No.1 materials
when the weld is deposited using a WPS qualified with impact testing?
Reply (2): No.
95
48