Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
DepEd Complex, Meralco Avenue
Pasig City
ALLAN L. SIBAL,
Complainant-appellant. FOR: Serious Dishonesty, Grave
Misconduct and Gross Neglect
-versus- of Duty.
COMES NOW, the undersigned petitioner, unto this Honorable Office respectfully avers:
1. That on July 22, 2016, the undersigned petitioner, filed a complained against
Janette M. Dulin, Leivy l. Turo, Grace K. Tolentino, Janet C. Canapi and Myra
Candaroma, all members of School Selection Committee of Tuguegarao West
Central Elementary School, Tuguegarao City, for Serious Dishonesty, Grave
Misconduct and Gross Neglect of Duty, before the Office of the Secretary;
2. That the case was remanded to the DepEd Regional Office No. 2 for the
conduct of investigation;
3. That for the information of the Honorable Secretary, the case stemmed from
the acts of the School Selection Committee in providing co-curricular scores
to Milton Eero Perez, Valedictorian of Tuguegarao West Central Elementary
School for SY 2015-2016, which are not in accordance with DepEd Orders 92
s. 2009 and 74 s, 2012, as well as other DepEd Policies;
in light of the foregoing, this Office does not deem it proper to conduct
further administrative disciplinary proceedings. Nonetheless, the PCOs are
sternly warned to be more circumspect in the conduct of their duties so s
to avoid any impropriety or even the appearance thereof.
6. That the Honorable Regional Director should have taken into consideration
that most of the documents requested by the undersigned petitioner was
declared by the School Selection Committee as confidential documents
intentionally for the purpose of withholding them so I cannot question the
validity of documents;
7. That with due respect to the Honorable Regional Director, the undersigned
petitioner believe that she committed error on the following:
After the minutes have been read, Mrs. Aida Talamayan, Public Schools
District Supervisor stated that she noticed that the co-curricular
performance was deliberated first. She then asked the deliberation team
why it was the procedure that it adopted. According to the team, they
decided to deliberate on the co-curricular performance first because it is a
long process. They further added that before the deliberation, they were
already able to identify the top ten students through the computation of
their academic ranks. Thus, limited the deliberation for the co-curricular
performance of those pupils who belonged to the top ten ranks. (Annex
H of the complaint, italics and underline supplied)
The above item should be clarified under Item 3.a of the same Order
c.) The Honorable Regional Director erred in declaring that DepEd Orders 92
s, 2009 and 74 s, 2012 are subject to varying interpretation hence
rendering the instant complaint bereft of merit.