Ancient Man and His First Civilizations

Etruria
Italy

________________________________________

What is this all about?

Sometime during the 19th century, the Albino people decided to revise Mans
history. In their new history: they (the Albinos) became the native peoples of
Europe, and in a totally mindless example of intellectual Greed, they also
declared that they were also the creators of mans original civilizations -
including Egypt.

This revising of history lasted through the 19th. and twentieth centuries. Now
in the 21st. century, some institutions are trying to undo that two centuries of
lies (perhaps in an effort to lessen the shock of publications like this one). In
this case, it is one of the formerly foremost purveyors of Albino lie History -
National Geographic. In April of 2013, National Geographic published a study
which "Admits" that Africans were the Original settlers of Europe. And Also
"Admits" that MODERN Europeans are newcomers. But in "Normal" Albino lie
fashion, they refuse to admit that modern Europeans are Central Asian
Albinos. But because many people, including some Blacks, won't believe
anything unless a White person says so, we include it in our presentation.

Click here for a copy of the study, and a link to the original at NG.

Before continuing on with our normal history, we think it

important to analyze and comment on these new
developments.
 Is this worth reading - is it True?

On the matter of credibility: On first reading, readers of these pages generally

feel amazement, the concept of Blacks being the original settlers, and builders
of the first civilizations everywhere, including Europe, is particularly unsettling
to them. Both Black and White, because they were taught that there were no
Blacks in Europe until the Romans brought them. Then some Blacks correctly
say: Uh huh, I knew the Whites were lying, and then go on to enjoy their
edification. But Whites remain incredulous, they say: this is simply Blacks with
no accomplishments, trying to steal White accomplishment and history! They
say, if this was true, my Teachers and Professors would have taught it to me.
So either this is lies, or the information is so new that my Teachers and
Professors don't know about it yet!

Well No, though it may be comforting to believe that your Teachers and
Professors are of sufficient character that they would not lie to you, the facts
do not support that conclusion. The fact is that European scientists had
evidence, and knew from earlier that the 19th century, of the Black mans
central role in settling and establishing civilization in Europe and everywhere
else. The exhibits below attest to the fact that this knowledge was known over
a hundred years ago. So either your Teachers and Professors are indeed liars,
or they were very poorly educated.
 PREHISTORIC MAN AND HIS STORY.

By Professor G. F. SCOTT ELLIOT, M.A., B.Sc., F.L.S., F.R.G.S.

With Seventy Illustrations and Diagrams. Demy 8vo. 7/6 net.

THE NEGROID OF GRIMALDI

The Aurignacians found the Moustierian or Neander-thaler in France, and

during all the changes sketched above, the former seem to have held the
own in that country. After the Wurm Ice Age the Aurignacians modified
their weapons and mode of life, and, after the theory which we have
adopted, became the men of La Madeleine.

These Aurignacians and their Magdalenian descendants pervaded all Cen

and Southern Europe. Their remains have also been discovered in Valetta
(Malta), in Phoenicia (Nahr Antelias), and elsewhere, as we shall try to
show later. But during this long period of time two other races also
succeeded in entering France and Italy. These were a negroid, perhaps
pygmy, folk and the men of Solutrean.

We have seen that the Aurignacian was originally an African, and if he

traversed North Africa on his way from Egypt and Mesopotamia, it would
have been a very remarkable fact if he had not come in contact with the
African pygmy or his ancestors, for the Bushman, Wam-battu, and the
other pygmies are the oldest African race known to us.

The negroids discovered by Dr. Verneau in the Grotte du Grimaldi,

though differing greatly from modern Bushmen, show that the Aurignacia
were acquainted with a negroid stock, which may perhaps be assumed to
be an ancestor of, or allied to, the pygmy. It is difficult to say exactly wh
was the relation between the Aurignacian and this negroid race.

Moreover, since the discovery of this burial, characteristic skulls of the

same negroid affinity have been found in Spain, in Brittany (of Neolithic
date), at Sierra (not earlier than the thirteenth century), in Sardinia, at
Ostorf, and perhaps in Caithness.
MORE FAKE SURPRISE ABOUT IPSWICH MAN
Central Asia
 Though most Dravidian Albinos left Central Asia for Europe
from ancient times: due to Mongol pressure and/or a desire
for better lands. Some Dravidian Albinos remained in Central
Asia, their descendants are clearly visible there today.

rstand that the average person - after a lifetime of the Albino lie that they (Albinos) are nat
me of Europe - finds this material hard to believe. So, under the heading of: "Strange Bedfell
e "Race Experts" at "STORMFRONT:"

ntral Asians are extensively mixed-race with both White and East Asian blood and the Whit
were there first and are the indigenous people of Central Asia.
 Update 2014:
reka! The Albinos have finally admitted where they come from

ponder what this admission means, you might also consider what nonsense like this means:
Google "Where do White people come From" the second result that you will get is this Livescience article
ult is Stormfront - go ahead and read it for a laugh).

d People Become White?

r Whipps, September 01, 2009

Vitamin D plays an important role in bone growth and the body's natural protection against certain dise
inability to absorb enough in areas of less-powerful sunlight would have decreased life expectancies in
ancestors. The further north they trekked, the more vitamin D they needed and the lighter they got over
ions, due to natural selection.

hile people of all skin types have the ability to produce the same amount of vitamin D in their systems,
ted (Black) people will need to stay in the sun around 6 times longer than light people in order to synthe
me amount of vitamin D, Juzeniene said, and a lack of the vitamin something occurring among many
an children right now, partly because they don't get out much can make humans more susceptible to
ing from heart disease to internal cancers.

of course "Pure" lie:

ast century, cases of Rickets (often caused by lack of Vitamin D) was epidemic in Europe and North Ame
o, that they had to start adding Vitamin D in the manufacture of their Milk, Cereals, Cheeses, and such. T
ne for Blacks - who don't need it, it was done for Albino people, who desperately needed it.

ASON FOR SUCH RIDICULOUS STATEMENTS AND LIES IS THIS:

ans went into Europe circa 45,000 B.C. and STAYED Black.

odern Europeans MUST have ALWAYS been WHITE!

INOS!

e section "Indus Valley-2" and other pages for the history of Europeans.
________________________________________________
_________________________________________

HOWEVER! Just as one group of Albino people had decided to admit that they
came from Central Asia, and had ALWAYS been White, and thus derived from
Dravidian Albinos. Other groups were pressing ahead with new lies to buttress
European claims of being Black Africans who turned White because of Vitamin
D deficiency. But these new claims have a twist, one would suppose to keep up
with the times.

The "Supposed" New research is reported by YahooNews.com from

LiveScience. Link to the on-line Newsstory

And the Daily Mail U.K. online. Link to the on-line Newsstory

Nature - International weekly Journal of science (no comment) also carried

the story. Link to on-line Newsstory

The LiveScience Headline says: 7,000-Year-Old Human Bones Suggest New

Date for Light-Skin Gene

And the Daily Mail U.K. Headline says: Light skin in Europeans stems from ONE
10,000-year-old ancestor who lived between India and the Middle East, claims
study

The reason for these nonsensical proclamations is THIS, as summed up by

LiveScience:

An ancient European hunter-gatherer man had dark skin and

blue eyes, a new genetic analysis has revealed. The analysis
of the man, who lived in modern-day Spain only about 7,000
years ago, shows light-skin genes in Europeans evolved
much more recently than previously thought.
This drawing depicting a "Dark White Man" is of course the typical Albino
falsification of history and science. The fact is that YOU CAN NOT do a Forensic
Facial Reconstruction by "DRAWING" it! Making a facial reconstruction can
"ONLY" be done by a doctor of physical and forensic anthropology with
extensive training in anatomy (both medical and artistic). These facial
reproductions draw on the science behind the morphology (shape) of the face
as well as a knowledge of materials. Reconstructions start with a SKULL (or
mold) and includes laboriously using "shaped" clay to fill-in for Muscles and
tissue (including skin) on the skull until it is complete. Only after this process
is complete, can you see what the individual might have looked like.

Lets take those points individually

. Hunter-gatherers, some of them blue-eyed, who came from
Africa more than 40,000 years ago

They would have looked like THIS:

. Middle Eastern farmers who migrated west much more

recently

They would have looked like THIS:

 . A mysterious population whose range may have spanned
northern Europe and Siberia

We have no idea who that could be, unless they are talking
about "Modern" Europeans AFTER they had migrated from
Central Asia.

Here is a link to the actual study (pdf).

The La Brana skeleton's haplogroup was reported as Mtdna U5: (the same as
12,700 year old Cheddar Man in England, and some in the 3,000 year old
Lichtenstein Cave in Lower Saxony, Germany).

Dienekes reports the Y-haplogroup as Y-dna C6. That however is not

confirmed, but if true, it relates La Brana in Spain to Australian aborigines, the
Lani and Dani people of Western New Guinea (100% & 92%), as well as many
other Pacific Islanders and Asians.

NOTABLE QUOTE FROM THE STUDY:

Pigmentation genes in the Mesolithic genome. The SNPs around the two
diagnostic variants (red arrows) in these two genes were analysed. The
resulting haplotype comprises neighbouring SNPs that are also absent in
modern Europeans (CEU) (n5=112) but present in Yorubans (YRI) (n5=113).
This pattern confirms that the La Brana 1 sample is older than the positive-
selection event in these regions.

[The Yoruba people are an ethnic group of southwestern Nigeria and southern
Benin in West Africa].

THEN THERE IS THIS!

Click here for: A comprehensive compilation of data associated with Albinism
>>>

Brittany France
Concerning Literature
Egyptians, Sumerians, Mohenjo-daroans, Harappans, and Cretans, Elamites, and
Nubians, were literate 3,000 years, 4,000 years, who knows how many
thousands of years, before the world ever heard of Greeks or Romans. And there
is ample evidence of their literacy.

Yet there is not one single entry: describing any of the people of their times,
whether it be friends, foes, or invaders: or even more incredulously, there is not
one single entry describing invading Whites in any of their literature.

Contrast that with Greek and Roman writings, in which these NEWLY literate
people, after suffering through the "Dark ages" caused by the Albinos invasion,
describe EVERYTHING and EVERYONE - except themselves!

These discrepancies are of course, not accidental, nor for lack of material.
Hopefully, the White man has simply withheld this material, and not destroyed
it.

On a related matter:

We the lied-to and oppressed, often comfort ourselves by believing that things are getting
better, and perhaps in some ways that is so. But in regards to the Albinos trying to steal
Black history, well, in that regard things are definitely getting worst!

It comes as a shock to some, that the current, and very false assertion by the Albinos that
they are native to Europe, is NEW! Surprisingly, Albino scholars of only a hundred years ago,
freely admitted that Albinos MOVED into Europe, and were NOT native to those lands. While
they were in error on other things, some even correctly identified the Albino homeland as
Central Asia.

Please note this example:

The North American Review

The North American Review (NAR) was the first literary magazine in the United States.
Founded in Boston in 1815 by journalist Nathan Hale and others, it was published
continuously until 1940.

Until the founding of the Atlantic Monthly in 1857, the NAR was the foremost publication in
New England and probably the entire United States.[citation needed] For all its lasting
impact on American literature and institutions, however, the Review had no more than 3000
subscribers in its heyday.
The NAR's first editor, William Tudor (1779-1830), and other founders had been members of
Boston's Anthology Club, and launched The North American Review to foster a genuine
American culture. In its first few years the NAR published poetry, fiction, and miscellaneous
essays on a bi-monthly schedule, but in 1818 it became a quarterly with more focused
contents intent on improving society and on elevating culture. The NAR promoted the
improvement of public education and administration, with reforms in secondary schools,
sound professional training of doctors and lawyers, rehabilitation of prisoners at the state
penitentiary, and government by educated experts.

The NAR's editors and contributors included several literary and political New Englanders as
John Adams, George Bancroft, Nathaniel Bowditch, William Cullen Bryant, Lewis Cass,
Edward T. Channing, Caleb Cushing, Richard Henry Dana, Sr., Alexander Hill Everett, Edward
Everett, Jared Sparks, George Ticknor, Gulian C. Verplanck, and Daniel Webster.

Please note this entry from:

The North American Review Volume 0139 Issue 334 (Sept 1884)
Title: Our Remote Ancestry [pp. 246-256]
Author: Winchell, Alexander, Prof.
Collection: Journals: North American Review (1815 - 1900)
 MORE!

ANCIENT TYPES OF MAN

BY ARTHUR KEITH (1911)
CHAPTER VI, THE GRIMALDI OR NEGROID TYPE IN EUROPE, PAGE 59-63:

At the close of the last and at the beginning of the present century, largely owing to the
interest taken in the history of primitive man by the Prince of Monaco, systematic
excavations were carried out in deep strata of their floors. In one of these, the "Grotte des
Enfants," usually named the Grimaldi Cave In the lowest layer of all were found two
skeletonsone of a woman past middle life, with a stature estimated (5 ft. 2 in.) and the
other of a boy about sixteen to seventeen years of age, and about (5 ft. 1 in.) in height.
With them were found traces of a civilization and of a fauna which has led anthropologists
to assign them to the end of the Mousterien or beginning of the Aurignacien Period [40,000
to 28,000 years ago]. French anthopologist Dr. Verneau, who has published the results of a
minute examination of these two ancient individuals, from various features seen in the
skeletons, had no hesitation in assigning them to a Negroid race.

The Uganda Protectorate (1902) by Harry Johnston.

CHAPTER XIV

Remains which have been found in Sicily, in Sardinia, and the Pyrenees (France), including a
curious little statuette fashioned by men of the Stone Age discovered in the last-named
locality, hint at the possibility of men of this Pygmy Negro type having spread over part of
Europe: it has been even hinted by more than one anthropologist of authority that a Dwarf
negroid race may have, at one time, existed in Northern Europe, and by an exaggeration in
legend and story of their peculiar habitshabits strangely recalling the characteristics of
the little Dwarf people of the Congo of the present dayhave given rise to the stories of
kobolds, elves, sprites, gnomes, and fairies.

MAN'S PLACE IN NATURE AND OTHER ANTHROPOLOGICAL ESSAYS

BY THOMAS H. HUXLEY (1899)
HUMAN FOSSILS
I shall confine myself, in discussing this question, to those fragmentary Human skulls from
the caves of Engis in the valley of the Meuse, in Belgium, which have been examined with so
much care by Sir Charles Lyell; upon whose high authority I shall take it for granted, that
the Engis skull belonged to a contemporary of the Mammoth and of the woolly Rhinoceros.
The skull from the cave of Engis was originally discovered by Professor Schmerling, and was
described by him, together with other human remains disinterred at the same time, in his
valuable work, " Recherches sur les Ossemens fossiles decouverts dans les Cavernes de la
Province de Liege, published in 1833 (p. 59, et seq.), from which the following paragraphs
are extracted, the precise expressions of the author being, as far as possible, preserved.

In order to neglect no point respecting the form of this fossil skull, we may observe that,
from the first, the elongated and narrow form of the forehead attracted our attention. In
fact, the slight elevation of the frontal, its narrowness, and the form of the orbit,
approximate it more nearly to the cranium of an Ethiopian than to that of a European.

CIVILIZATION OR BARBARISM: AN AUTHENTIC ANTHROPOLOGY

BY CHEIKH ANTA DIOP (1981): PP. 15-16

The Grimaldi Negroids have left their numerous traces all over Europe and Asia, from the
Iberian Peninsula to Lake Baykal in Siberia, passing through France, Austria, the Crimea,
and the Basin of Don, etc. In these last two regions, the late Soviet Professor Mikhail
Gerasimov, a scholar of rare objectivity, identified the Negroid type from skulls found in the
Middle Mousterian period.
 bsequent DNA study by David Reich & Svante Pbo titled: "An early modern human from Romania with
nt Neanderthal ancestor:" Terms the specimen "Oase-1" and re-dates it to 37,00042,000-years-old. Oa
longs to the Y-dna haplogroup F, which is carried by most males in Eurasia today. The Mtdna = N. Study
te: We then find that the Oase 1 individual shares equally as many alleles with early Europeans, as with
ent-day East Asians and Native Americans.
 Click here for the genesis of the European languages: Click
>>>

Etruria is probably the best example: aside from Britain; (Click here for British
History) of the White Mans attempts at creating a false history for himself, and
in that process, obliterating actual history. In its traditional foundation myth,
Romulus and Remus are Rome's twin founders . They are descendants of the
Trojan prince and refugee Aeneas, and are fathered by the god Mars or the
demi-god Hercules on a royal Vestal Virgin, Rhea Silvia (also known as Ilia),
whose uncle exposes them to die in the wild. They are found by a she-wolf
who suckles and cares for them. The twins are eventually restored to their
regal birthright, acquire many followers and decide to found a new city -
Rome. The Romans are also known as Latin's: But the Latin's (or Latini, as
they called themselves) were an "Original" people of ancient Italy. Quite
different from the White invaders from Central Asia.

The most common hypothesis is that the Italic peoples migrated into the
Italian peninsula from Central Asia, sometime during the Italian Bronze Age
(ca. 1800-900 BC). The most likely route for the "so-called" Italic migration
was from the Balkan peninsula along the Adriatic coast. But it is already
accepted that the original Europeans were Black people (and no, they did not
turn into White people because of vitamin D deficiency), Note People like the
"Iceman" below, whose mitochondrial DNA belongs to the K1 subcluster of the
mitochondrial haplogroup K, which appears abundantly in ancient North
Africa. Also, the Latin's already existed in Italy BEFORE the White people we
erroneously call Romans arrived - thus the people we call Romans could not
have been italics either!
Logically then: if the people who were originally called Romans, are
descendants of Black Anatolians (Troy), and if the other name that we know
them by (Latin's) are a "Native" Black Italian people: then just WHO were the
White people from Central Asia who usurped these names, and what name did
they go by? In the process of creating their "False" history, Whites, as usual,
destroyed the writings of the ancients (the last being the Etrusca Disciplina,
the Etruscan books of cult and divination, which were collected and burned in
the 5th century), and created "False" artifacts to backup their false historical
claims (note Capitoline Wolf below). The stupid irony in all of this, is that not
only have Whites wiped out the true history of the original Italians, they also
wiped out their own history.

As is always the case with Europeanized history, there has always been an
attempt by European Academics and researchers to establish a genetic link
between modern White Europeans and Europes Original Black inhabitants. To
that end, there has been no lack of Bogus and mis-attributed Artifacts, along
with the requisite bogus history. But today, a new breed of researchers have
taken the stage; a group less insecure and more honest - but still not
completely honest: Though they present the data, they still present it in a
confusing and obfuscating way, and they still can't seem to bring themselves
to actually say it, i.e. The first Europeans were Black People and we are
Albinos from Central Asia! Note the studies below: there must be some type of
Phobia, peculiar only to White people.

As we know, there are three direct ways of entering Europe from Africa:

(1) Cross the Strait of Gibraltar and Enter in Spain, or Cross in Anatolia/Turkey
(2) at the Bosphorus (now known as the Istanbul Strait) or (3) the
Dardanelle's (formerly known as Hellespont).

We know that modern Africans (The Khoisan like Grimaldi) first entered
Europe by way of the Strait of Gibraltar (circa 45,000 ya), because the oldest
skeletons are found in nearby France/Monaco.

At about 7,500 ya, African FARMERS moved into Europe by way of Anatolia.
These "NEW" Africans mixed with the Grimaldi Africans who were already
there. Out of this mixture was born the modern Black European. For centuries,
since they first "Usurped" rule in Europe, the Albinos have tried to convince
the world that they are "Original" Europeans. It's a lie, and even their own
scientists prove it.
Here is some of the nonsense the Albinos
write about the Etruscans:
The study goes on to say:
Various tests show that the Tuscans (see next study below) are the Etruscans
closest neighbors in terms of genetic distances. Despite that broad similarity,
however, Etruscans and Tuscans share only two haplotypes. This finding is
difficult to interpret in the absence of data on any other European population
of the pre-classical period. One possible interpretation is that all or most
European populations of that time period were as different from their modern
counterparts as the Etruscans appear to be. This would imply either extensive
gene flow or a high rate of extinction of mitochondrial haplotypes, both
processes causing a drastic change of the mitochondrial pool in the last 2,500
years. More importantly, a result of that kind would force us to reconsider the
universally held assumption that patterns in the DNA of modern individuals
reflect the evolutionary processes affecting their prehistoric ancestors.
Alternatively, should other ancient populations prove similar to comparable
modern ones, one should conclude that the Etruscans mitochondrial
sequences underwent extinction at a particularly high rate and look for an
explanation for that. Until more ancient DNA data become available, both
scenarios will remain possible, although we favor the latter.

But then they go on to say obfuscating

nonsense like this:
Etruscans show closer relationships both to North Africans and to Turks than
any contemporary population. In particular, the Turkish component in their
gene pool appears three times as large as in the other populations. (Note: The
Turks are an Albino people from Asia - now heavily admixed with the
indigenous Black people of Anatolia - who first entered the west in the 6th.
century A.D, and later conquered Anatolia, then called the Byzantine or
Eastern Roman Empire in 1453. Obviously what these liars are seeing is the
genes of the original Black Anatolians - NOT the Turks!

Albino scientists can't help but lie: because the alternative is to admit that
they are Albinos, and invaders of Europe. So the say obfuscating things like
this, see above: "Various tests show that the Tuscan's are the Etruscans
closest neighbors in terms of genetic distances". The problem for them, is that
they have no way to cross reference other studies to see if the author is
furthering the Albino lies, or trying to tell the truth. In this case, there is
another study debunking that lie.

(Most agree that this Vernesi study was very poorly done. The
implied results were that around 13 of the sampled ancient
Etruscans were Mtdna "H", and the others were possibly J/T).

Other DNA Results:

Paglicci site Southern Italy

(Paglicci 23), dated 28,000 years BP Mtdna haplogroup H.
(Paglicci-12), dated 24,000 years BP Mtdna haplogroup N*
(Paglicci 25), dated 23,000 years BP Mtdna haplogroup HV.

tzi the Iceman, northern Italy 5,300 years BP Mtdna haplogroup K, Y-dna
G2a2b.
King Tutankhamun of Egypt, Y-dna haplogroup R1b1a2.
King Ramesses III of Egypt, 3,200 BP Y-dna haplogroup E1b1a.
Grimaldi at Malta Siberia, dated 24,000 BP Mtdna haplogroup U, Y-dna R.
Kostenki Russia, dated 34,000 BP Mtdna haplogroup U2.

Ancient Etruscans Unlikely Ancestors Of Modern Tuscans,

Testing Reveals.

News story from the Science Daily For the first time, Stanford university
researchers have used statistical computer modeling to simulate demographic
processes affecting the population of the Tuscany region of Italy over a 2,500-
year time span. Rigorous tests used by the researchers have ruled out a
genetic link between Ancient Etruscans, the original inhabitants of central
Italy, and the region's modern day residents.

The findings indicate (as is obvious from the pictured artifacts), that the
Ancient Etruscans had little in common with the people who later came to
Italy, said Joanna Mountain, assistant professor of anthropological sciences.
The findings as documented in ''Serial Coalescent Simulations indicate a
Weak Genealogical Relationship Between Etruscans and Modern Tuscans. The
study was published May 15, 2006 in the online version of the National
Academy of Sciences. Uma Ramakrishnan, a former Stanford postdoctoral
fellow, and Elise M. S. Belle along with Guido Barbujani of the University of
Ferrara in Italy, co-authored the paper with Mountain.

To date; the Etruscans are the only pre-classical European population that has
been genetically analyzed, Mountain said. Two years ago, Italian geneticists
extracted maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA from the bones of 27 people
called Etruscans found in six different necropolises (burial sites) in Tuscany.
The female lineage was investigated because, unlike the male Y chromosome,
many copies of mitochondrial DNA are found in each cell and thus are easier to
extract, Mountain explained. The finding is important because it questions the
common assumption that residents of a particular place are descendants of its
earlier inhabitants, Mountain said.
Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by Stanford University.

Also see:
Click here for a link to the study (pdf).

So who, or more correctly, WHAT are these

modern White people of Europe?
They are Albinos, many now admixed with the indigenous Black Europeans
they found in Europe: and who they eventually conquered and exterminated:
or shipped to the Americas. They originally left Africa with, and as the Albinos,
of the Black Dravidians now in India. Physically the only difference between a
Black Indian, and a European, is that the European has no, or little, "Melanin"
in their skin. Simply looking at a Dravidian, and a Dravidian Albino, bears this
out.
The Bhatti tribe of Pakistan still produces Albinos identical to the original
Germanics (see their descriptions in the writings of the Roman historian
Tacitus). (Note: Pakistan was originally part of India).
The National Geographic "Genographic Project" is an ambitious attempt to
answer fundamental questions about where we originated and how we came
to populate the Earth. The Genographic Project is a multiyear research
initiative led by National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence Dr. Spencer Wells.
Dr. Wells and a team of renowned international scientists are using cutting-
edge genetic and computational technologies to analyze historical patterns in
DNA from participants around the world to better understand our human
genetic roots.
(For full sized map, click link at top of page).
Note: The "Migration Period" referenced, reflects only the movements of
"MODERN ALBINO EUROPEANS": it does NOT reflect the incursions of the first
Albinos from Central Asian (circa 1,200 B.C.) who became a part of the Black
Greek and Roman civilizations.

Also note: the above Wiki article is not intended as a citation, it is merely to
demonstrate that even some Albinos academics acknowledge that their people
are NOT native to Europe "Proper". However, in true lying Albino fashion, the
Wiki article goes on to say:

To put the above paragraph into lucid though, let us paraphrase:

"God laid down the Albinos in Scandinavia and said "Go forth and Multiply".

No word on how they got to Scandinavia, or where they came from, so

obviously God just dropped them there!

This is totally in keeping with the various Albino founding myths:

First they were the original Europeans.

Then they were the original Black Europeans, but they turned White because
they weren't getting enough vitamin "D".

When we said, that's nonsense, you're Albinos: they said that they're NOT
Albinos because Albinos have "BAD EYESIGHT" and they don't. (They never
explain why the Africans with "GOOD EYESIGHT" are still Albinos, but they
aren't. (Shouldn't we call those many African Albinos who overwhelmingly
have good eyesight "Europeans" or some such thing)?
And now they say that White Europeans: what, grew out of a "Cabbage patch"
in Scandinavia, and from there conquered the world?

Click here for the complete story of European Albinos.

 Genetics clearly traces the Dravidians, and
their Albinos, out of Africa, into India, and
finally, into Europe. (The predominate
Haplogroup of White/Albino Europeans is Y-
dna Haplogroup "R").

plogroup R (Y-DNA)

human genetics, Haplogroup R is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup, a subgroup of haplogroup P, define

the M207 mutation.

is haplogroup is believed to have arisen around 26,800 years ago, somewhere in Central Asia or South
ia, where its ancestor Haplogroup P is most often found at polymorphic frequencies. Cambridge Universi
neticist Kivisild et al. (2003) suggests that southern and western Asia might be the source of this
plogroup:

ven the geographic spread and STR diversities of sister clades R1 and R2, the latter of which is restricted
India, Pakistan, Iran, and southern central Asia, it is possible that southern and western Asia were the
urce for R1 and R1a differentiation.

e R haplogroup is common throughout Europe and western Asia and the Indian sub-continent, and in
ose whose ancestry is from within these regions. It also occurs in North and Sub-Saharan Africa.
What role did sexual selection play in the
evolution of the White/Albino Race?
Click here: >>>
 Summarizing the above:

ding were scientific lies created by Albinos, and scientific truths uncovered to refute them, in the never-e
orts to hide their true origins and diseased condition (Albinism). As regarding modern skin color: the sim
e Central Asian Albinos came into Europe, some Black men were having sex with the females, (no doubt
n seem to have a natural resentment towards Black men). The results of those copulations were Mulatto
but the color of subsequent offspring changed with the color of the participants as follows:

ration: Assuming continued mating with ONLY Albinos.

1/2 Black and 1/2 Albino

neration:
= 1/4 Black and 3/4 Albino

eration:
= 1/8 Black and 7/8 Albino

neration:
oon = 1/16 Black and 15/16 Albino.

generation the original mulatto becomes lighter and lighter. But generally speaking, Quadroons are
shable from everyday MODERN Albinos, because modern Albinos are in fact HIGHLY admixed already.
ering Tacitus's description of the Germanics being "Blue-eyed Redheads"), there is not that many of them
 y in technical conversations we say modern Europeans are mostly "DERIVED" from Albinos - of course m
Albino. That could be because none in the line ever mated with a Black person, (after the initial mating o
iers, which caused their Albinism). But that could also be from continued "BACK" mating with PURE Albin
es them back to their original Albinism condition.

only European Albinos do that!

lbinos, the world over, are careful to mate ONLY with pigmented people.
 The "Real" History

Malta

On the Island of Malta, the Ghar Dalam culture is the earliest known phase of
Malta culture. At the Cave Ghar Dalam the earliest evidence of human
settlement on Malta, some 7,400 years ago was found. Because of debris left
by these ancient Humans, this cave is also a veritable depository of semi-
fossilized remains and extinct species such as dwarf elephants and
hippopotami which roamed the island some 250,000 years ago, ostensibly
when it was still part of the mainland.
It is suggested that a rise in sea level stranded these large mammals on the
island and that the lack of food caused the dwarf versions to evolve. This
theory is however challenged by the existence of Pygmy Hippopotamus native
to the forests and swamps of western Africa particularly in the country of
Liberia.
During the neolithic Age from 5,000 to 4,500 B.C, the cave was also one of the
sites used by a new wave of man who crossed to the Maltese islands from
Sicily via a land bridge. By 3,600-3,000 B.C, Temples began to be constructed,
simply at first, but then increasingly more sophisticated. So that by 3,000 B.C,
construction had become very sophisticated: such as the immense stone
blocks and the intricate facades of Hagar Qim.
During the Temple building phase, Egyptian influence on the Maltese is evident
in the manner in which they built their tombs and temples and buried their
dead. (However, the nature of their statuary, particularly their Mother
Goddesses which are depicted as Steatopygia females, indicates ethnic
commonality with the peoples of the Cyclades islands in the Aegean Sea, and
the civilization at Catal Huyuk in Anatolia (Turkey). These civilizations trace
their begins to the ancient Khoisan of Southern Africa (Grimaldi man); who
were the first Fully Modern Humans to cross over to Europe in about 45,000
B.C). Click here for more on Grimaldi Man >>>

This phase of Malta culture came to a sudden end at about 2,000 B.C, possibly
as a result of invasions. The culture that replaced it, of Mycenaean flavor, is
evidenced today only by fragmentary remains; Bronze Age tools and weapons
have been found at Borg in-Nadur (near Birzebbuga) and Tarxien Cemetery
(near Paola), while Iron Age relics from about 1,200 to 800 B.C, include cart
ruts at Bingemma (near Nadur Tower).

The Phoenicians
At around 700 B.C, the White Greeks settled on Malta, especially around the
area where Valletta now stands. A century later; Phoenician traders, who used
the islands as a stop on their trade routes from the eastern Mediterranean to
Great Britain, (from where they obtained Tin, which when smelted with copper
(from Cyprus) created the durable metal alloy bronze; Strabo states that there
was a highly lucrative Phoenician trade with Britain for tin). They also joined
the natives on the island. The Phoenicians inhabited the area now known as
Mdina, and its surrounding town of Rabat, which they called Maleth. The later
arriving Romans, who also lived in Mdina, referred to it (and the island) as
Melita.
Cyrus the Great conquered Phoenicia in 539 B.C. After the fall of Phoenicia
proper; the area came under the control of the Phoenician colony in North
Africa called Carthage, (which was founded in 814 B.C, under Pygmalion, King
of Tyre), it's remains are a suburb of Tunis in present-day Tunisia. During this
time, the people on Malta mainly cultivated olives and carobs, and produced
textiles.

During the First Punic War (wars with Rome) of 218 B.C, tensions led the
Maltese people to rebel against Carthage and turn control of their garrison
over to the Roman Republic consul Sempronius. Malta remained loyal to Rome
during the Second Punic War and the Romans rewarded it with the title
Foederata Civitas, a designation that meant it was exempt from paying tribute
or the rule of Roman law, although at this time it fell within the jurisdiction of
Sicilia province. Finally, in 146 B.C, after a third war with Rome, Carthage
suffered total destruction. It was rebuilt as a Roman colony in 44 B.C. The
ancient Phoenician language survived in use as a vernacular in some of the
smaller cities of North Africa at least until the time of St. Augustine, bishop of
Hippo (5th century A.D). Click here for the story of Hannibal >>>
Around 100 A.D, the Maltese Islands were a thriving part of the Roman
Empire, being promoted to the status of Municipium under Hadrian. The Bible
in the Acts of the Apostles, relates that during 60 A.D, Jesus Christ's apostle
Saint Paul, was shipwrecked on the northern shore of the island at Saint Paul's
Bay, being received by the person who would be known to posterity as Saint
Publius, and stayed in Malta for three months, introducing Christianity and
performing various miracles.

When the Roman Empire split into Eastern and Western divisions in the 4th
century, Malta fell under the control of the Greek speaking Byzantine Empire
from 395 to 870 A.D, which ruled from Constantinople. Although Malta was
under Byzantine rule for four centuries, not much is known from this period.
There is evidence that Germanic tribes, including the Goths and Vandals,
briefly took control of the islands before the Byzantines launched a counter
attack and retook Malta.

Euphemius was a Byzantine admiral, Probably born in Messina Sicily, and may
have been non-White; at about 826 A.D, he proclaimed himself emperor in
Syracuse, and the whole territory of the islands. He was subsequently
defeated by Byzantine troops and escaped to Ifriqiya (North Africa), where he
asked for help from the Arabs to take Sicily and Malta from the Byzantines. In
827 A.D, he returned to Sicily with a large Arab fleet. Euphemius was killed
later that year during an attack on Enna, but the Arabs were successful in
taking the Islands.

The Arabs introduced new irrigation methods, new fruits and cotton, and the
Siculo-Arabic language was adopted on the islands, and from Sicily to
Southern Italy: it would eventually evolve into the Maltese language. The
native Christians were allowed freedom of religion, but had to pay an extra
tax. The Normans from the Duchy of Normandy successfully invaded Sicily and
the Maltese Islands in 1091 A.D, and "Roger I" was warmly welcomed by the
native Christians. The Maltese offered to fight for him and in response Roger
reportedly tore off a portion of his flag, half-red half-white, presenting it to the
Maltese; this formed the basis of the flag of Malta.

The Catholic Church was re-instated as the state religion, with Malta under the
See of Palermo. Norman architecture sprung up around Malta, especially in its
ancient capital Mdina. Tancred of Sicily, the last Norman monarch, made Malta
and Gozo a feudal lordship or fief within the kingdom, and a Count of Malta
was instituted. The kingdom passed on to the House of Hohenstaufen from
1194 until 1266 A.D, and Malta was part of the Holy Roman Empire of the
German Nation for 72 years. It was under Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II of
Hohenstaufen (1194 1250 A.D.), that all remaining Muslims were expelled
from Malta (in 1224 A.D.) and the entire Christian male population of Celano in
Abruzzo, was exported to Malta to replace them - Thus Malta became a purely
White Island.

The Etruscans
Having established the true race of the Etruscans, let us now learn
about their civilization.

The Etruscans
Etruscans were members of the ancient civilization of Etruria, a country in
what is now Italy. Their urban civilization is though to have started well
before 800 B.C. But it's true beginnings cannot be ascertained, because their
literature, especially the Etrusca Disciplina, the Etruscan books of cult and
divination, were collected and burned in the 5th century A.D. by White
Christian elements. Some say the Etruscans were originally pelasgians (the
original people of Greece), some say that they were Phrygian migrants from
Anatolia. But both of those theories seem to miss the fact that the entire area
was inhabited by Black people, since about 45,000 B.C, when Grimaldi man
first entered Europe. Therefore there is absolutely no reason why the
Etruscans could not have evolved In situ.

All that remains of Etruscan writings are inscriptions like this.

If past behavior is any guide, the ridiculous dating of Etruscan civilization to

800-900 B.C, by White people, is in response to the Etruscans being
scientifically proven to be Black people. That very late dating, would serve to
make it seem that they were not truly "Ancient". The Etruscans called
themselves "Rasenna" which was syncopated to Rasna or Rana. Those that
joined the "Sea People" exodus were known as the Tyrrhenians.
The Etruscan pendant (below), which has several Swastika symbols (an
ancient sign for good luck), connects Etruscans with ancient Nubia (Sudan) on
whose pottery it is first found: and also the Indus valley civilization, as well as
the Mesopotamian civilizations. The design of their chariots is similar to
Egyptian Chariots - one rider, two horses.
The Etruscan cities were
large, and in all ways
comparable to cities of the
other great ancient
civilizations. Etruscan state
government, like others of
those times, was a theocracy
(the king was deified, and
considered a god). Their
religion employed elaborate
cults and rituals.

Very little is known about

their social and civic
structure, except that their city-states weren't particularly unified. The heads
of Etruscan cities, apparently at times, met to discuss military and political
affairs. But apart from this, the Etruscans could be considered, as many
ancient sources describe them, duodecim populi Eturiae or the twelve
peoples of Eturia, (the twelve peoples, referring to the twelve major city-
states).
^Whites can't help lying. A fisherman dressed like that,
what kind of a fisherman could afford such a fine statue?
Although the divisions between the Etruscan states were not as extreme as
those found in other areas; like Sumer, where they were constantly at war
with each other. Still, these individual Etruscan states were strange in that
they apparently felt no obligation to cooperate with each other, and provide
aid to each other in times of need. Consequently they had no mechanism to
unify, when faced with a common threat.
Their agriculture was advanced and efficient, and their trading and commercial
relationships were far ranging and profitable. Mining and the commerce of
metal, especially copper and iron, led to the enrichment of the Etruscans and
to the expansion of their influence in the Italian peninsula and the western
Mediterranean sea.
 Paestum
Around the end of the 7th century B.C, colonists from the Greek city of Sybaris
founded the city of Paestum near Naples (and originally known as Poseidonia).
Outside of archaeological evidence very little is known about Paestum during
its first centuries. Archaeological evidence indicates that the city was
expanding with the building of roads, temples and other features of a growing
city. Paestum is also renowned for its painted tombs, mainly belonging to the
period of the Lucanian rule, while only one of them dates to the Greek period.
It was found, on 3 June 1968, in a small necropolis some 1,5 km south of the
ancient walls. The burial monument was named Tomb of the Diver (Italian:
Tomba del tuffatore) after the enigmatic scene, depicted on the covering slab,
of a lonely young man diving into a stream of water.
Click Here for pictures of Paestum tomb paintings: Click here
>>>

Paestum tomb painting