Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
115/22 kV 115/22 kV
2x50 MVA 2x50 MVA
CM2 Inference
engine
115/22 kV 115/22kV
2x50 MVA 2x50MVA
To network
115 kV
LN1 User User
interface
115/22 kV LN2
50 MVA
CTG
To network
Fig. 4. Block diagram of expert system.
115 kV
1283
0-7803-7322-7/02/$17.00 (c) 2002 IEEE
sensitivity of Sitp for one step tap change, the next most The load sensitivity ( SLi ) at each load buses, which using
effective transformer for voltage correction is located at node prediction equation of linear regression.
q with a sensitivity of Sitq for one step tap change and so on. L i = L0i + S Li (t i t ) (3)
7) The constraints of expert system are recommends
switching action for both shunt capacitors and transformer Vi = Vi 0 + S scli (C i ) (4)
tap for voltage correction. The expert system gives priority for
((ti t )( Li L ))
shunt capacitor compensation switching at the most effective S Li = (5)
for voltage correction. If this is not sufficient for voltage ( ti t ) 2
correction then it recommends transformer tap change at the
most effective transformer for each voltage violation node. S scli =
(V mes
vi Vvi0 ) (6)
These data base, except for the sensitivity table 5) and 6), C i
can be easily obtained for a power system. These data base where Li = Load at time sampling( i ).
can either be collected from the experts or from a numerical t = interval time sampling. (15 load sampling)
analysis using load flow calculations. SLi = load sensitivity.
B. Rules base Sscli = voltage sensitivity
3) For each bus voltage violation, sequentially search for
The rules base of an expert system describe relation or
the most effective control measure device by using the block
phenomena in the domain, and possible methods, heuristics
diagram to control device, which shown in Fig. 5 and
and ideas for solving problems in domain. The expert system
calculate the control action needed to recover the voltage
read the current voltage and load value and at each bus
violation.
through the monitor or input/output interface. Then, these
4) Check the control action from the view point of the
data compare the current voltage with their limits, and find
other bus voltage limits using the SCL or TCL ( Part 4 of Fig.
the buses with abnormal voltage and the magnitude of the
5 ). This is used to guarantee that recovering proper voltage
voltage violation. The expert system is implemented in the
level at one bus dose not cause bus voltage violations on other
form of a set of rules as described below:
buses.
1) If network voltage violation exists, then forms the follow
5) Output the search procedures and the recommended
list. Violation list, VL(Vv1 , Vv2 , ), in the order of most
control action through the I/O interface on monitor.
severe violation, where Vv1 is the most voltage violated node,
6) If voltage violation at node Vv is not completely relieved
Vv2 the next most voltage violated node and so on.
then pick the next most effective compensation from the SCL
2) Pick a node from the top of the violation list ( Vvi ).
list and go to rule 4).
- Check the most voltage violated node, it is lower or
7) Repeat the above procedure for each load bus of the
higher than voltage limits. (Part 1 of Fig. 5)
system until bus voltages are within limits.
- Check trend of load pattern at most voltage violated
The search procedure of the proposed expert system is
node.(increase or decrease, Part 2 of Fig. 5)
shown the detailed configuration of the developed expert
- Check trend of total load pattern in studies
system in Fig. 6.
network.(increase or decrease, Part 3 of Fig. 5)
A1
Action 1 (A1)
A1 First, Search shunt reactive
compensation for optimum
A2
voltage to control.
A1 Second, If shunt reactive
compensation are not ready
A1
then it recommends
Voltage
Violation A1 transformer tap change.
Node (Vni)
A1
A2
Sensitivity A1
factor increase Action 2 (A2)
Sensitivity factor A2 For most effective control of
decrease transformer tap changed.
A2
Sensitivity
factor constant
A2
1284
0-7803-7322-7/02/$17.00 (c) 2002 IEEE
(Vdesired Vactual (i))
Input Interface. Vdeviation (i) = 100% (7)
Vdesired
The performance of the expert system is compared with the
Identify the Current voltage Current load operator control in the terms of voltage deviation indices,
operating at each buses at each buses counters of transformer tap changing. Typical results for the
configuration
No
expert system are presented in Fig. 8-12. The resulting are
presented by the average actual data from the expert system
Find buses Find load and operator for controlling the 22kV voltage levels based on
with sensitivity ( SLi ) at the SCADA system. The voltage of power system is in limits
Knowledge abnormal each load buses,
Base voltage which using range (-3%-7%) when operating by both operator and expert
prediction system. However, the results of the expert system can reduce
yes equation of linear the number of transformer tap change more than 50 percent
regression. and voltage deviation within limits as shown in Fig.12.
Form the follow list.
Violation list VL(Vv1 , Vv2 ,
), in the order of most
Load (MW)
severe violation Control action from the view 400
point of the controllers
constrains with load 350
sensitivity ( SLi ) 300
Pick a node from
the top of the 250
violation list ( Vv ).
200
No
Check control action 150
Check the measure from the view point
device already to 100
of other bus voltage
control limits 50
0
yes 5.00am. 10.00am. 3.00pm. 8.00pm. 1.00am.
Output Interface. Time
Fig. 7. The normalized total load curve of 6 substation in this case study.
Fig. 6. The search procedure for expert system.
Number (%)
The inference engine of the expert is used for control 60
action of shunt reactive compensation and transformer tap 50
change for voltage correction. All the fact of SCL and TCL
40
are combined to form the knowledge base and rules base. The
inference engine recommends switching at the most effective 30
of shunt reactive compensation and transformer tap for 20
voltage violated node.
10
IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 0
The approach proposed in this paper was implemented and -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
tested on 6 substations in power system in northern of Voltage deviation(%) expert system operator
Thailand as shown in Fig. 1. The substations are Fig. 8. Load voltage deviation during 05.00-08.00.
Chiangmai1(CM1), Chiangmai2(CM2), Chiangmai3(CM3),
Number(%)
Chomthong(CTG), Lumphun1(LN1), Lumphun2(LN2), 60
which contained 11 of distribution transformers (115/22kV),
a tie transformer (230/115kV) and 28 steps of shunt 50
capacitors for 22kV, 6 steps of shunt capacitors for 115kV. 40
The normalized total load curve of networks is shown in Fig.
30
7. The normalized voltage deviation of the system was chosen
to be -3% and +7% for voltage limits in range (97-107%). 20
This value depends on the system operating conditions and is 10
set by operator based on experience with the system behavior.
In order to determine the voltage deviation is defined as (7) 0
and the time sampling (i) for each individual voltage bus is -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
60 times/hour. Thus total numbers counter of voltage Voltage deviation(%)
expert system operator
deviation for 18voltage bus are 1080 times/hour.
Fig. 9. Load voltage deviation during 08.00-10.00.
1285
0-7803-7322-7/02/$17.00 (c) 2002 IEEE
Number (%) VI. REFERENCES
50 [1] D. T. Bansilal and K. Parthasathy, An Expert System for Voltage Control
in a Power System Network, 1995 International Conference on Energy
40 Management and Power Delivery Vol.1, pp. 364-369.
[2] G. Krost and U. Spanel, Expert Systems Applied to Power System
30 Control, 12th Conference on the Electric Power Supply Industry 1998
(CEPSI 1998), Pattaya Thailand, Technical Paper Reference Book Vol.12,
pp. 22-30.
20 [3] S. J. Cheng, O.P. Malik and G.S. Hope, AN Expert System for Voltage
and Reactive Power Control of a Power System, IEEE Transaction on
10 Power System, Vol.3, No.4, pp. 1449-1455, November 1998.
[4] H. K. Clark and D. N. Ewart, Reactive Compensation in Power Systems,
0 First Symposium of Specialists in Electric Operational Planning
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Electrobras-Rio de Janeiro, August 17-21,1987, pp. 344-353.
Voltage deviation(%) [5] T. B. Girotti, N. B. Tweed and N. R. Houser, Real-Time Var Control By
expert system operator SCADA, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol.5, No.1, pp. 61-64,
Fig. 10. Load voltage deviation during 17.30-18.00. February 1990
[6] D. S. Kirschen and H. P. Van Meeteren, MW/Voltage Control in a
Number(%) Linear Programming Based Optimal Power Flow, IEEE Transactions on
50 Power Systems, Vol.3, No.2, pp. 481-489, May 1988.
[7] S. K. Chang, G. E. Marks and K. Kato, Optimal Real-Time Voltage
40 Control, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol.5, No.3, pp. 750-
758, August 1990.
30 [8] K. H. Abdul-Rahman and S. M. Shahidehpour, A Fuzzy-Based Optimal
Reactive Power Control, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol.8,
20 No.2, pp. 662-670, May 1993.
[9] E. Handschin and C. Dornemann, Bus Load Modelling and Forecasting,
10 IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol.3, No, pp. 627-633.2, May
1988.
0 [10] C. G. Kim, N. J. Woo, J. M. Lee and S. H. Kim, Implementation of a
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Short-Term Load Forecasting Expert System, 12th Conference on the
Voltage deviation(%)
expert system operator Electric Power Supply Industry 1998 (CEPSI 1998), Pattaya Thailand,
Technical Paper Reference Book Vol.12, pp. 56-63.
Fig. 11. Load voltage deviation during 18.00-22.00. [11] S. Rahman and R. Bhatnager, An Expert System Based Algorithm for
Short Term Load Forecast, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol.3,
No.2, pp. 392-399, May 1988.
Tap changing [12] H. S. Jung, S. S. Kim, J. K Park, S. Dong and Kwanak-gu, DSM Effect
(times) Analysis on Hourly Load Forecast in Korea Using Engineering Estimation
35 Method, 12th Conference on the Electric Power Supply Industry 1998
30 (CEPSI 1998), Pattaya Thailand, Technical Paper Reference Book Vol.12,
25 pp. 134-141.
20
15 VII. BIOGRAPHIES
10
5
0 Chakkrit Pimpa was bon in Thailand in 1969. He received the B.S.degree in
electriccal engineering from the King Mongkut's
05.00- 08.00- 17.30- 20.00-
Institute of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand,
08.00 10.00 20.00 22.00 in 1994. In 1994 he worked in Electricity
Time
Generating of Thailand (EGAT), where he has
expert system operator been working on system dispatch section at
Regional System Control and Operation Division
Fig. 12. The average total numbers of transformer tap changing.
1286
0-7803-7322-7/02/$17.00 (c) 2002 IEEE