Você está na página 1de 15

# Chapter 3 Eigenvalues and

eigenvectors,
diagonalisation of a
matrix, orthogonal

Diagonalisation diagonalisation fo
symmetric matrices

As in the previous chapter, there is no specific essential reading for this chapter. It
is essential that you do some reading, but the topics discussed in this chapter are
adequately covered in many texts on linear algebra. The list below gives examples of
relevant reading. (For full publication details, see Chapter 1.)

## Ostaszewski, A. Advanced Mathematical Methods. Chapter 5, sections 5.1 and

5.2.

Leon, S.J., Linear Algebra with Applications. Chapter 6, sections 6.1 and 6.3.

Simon, C.P. and Blume, L., Mathematics for Economists. Chapter 23, sections
23.1, 23.7.

Introduction

One of the most useful techniques in applications of matrices and linear algebra is
diagonalisation. Before discussing this, we have to look at the topic of eigenvalues
and eigenvectors. We shall explore a number of applications of diagonalisation in
the next chapter of the guide.

Definitions

## Suppose that A is a square matrix. The number is said to be an eigenvalue of

A if for some non-zero vector x, Ax = x. Any non-zero vector x for which this

37
equation holds is called an eigenvector for eigenvalue or an eigenvector of A
corresponding to eigenvalue .

## To determine whether is an eigenvalue of A, we need to determine whether there

are any non-zero solutions to the matrix equation Ax = x. Note that the matrix
equation Ax = x is not of the standard form, since the right-hand side is not a fixed
vector b, but depends explicitly on x. However, we can rewrite it in standard form.
Note that x = Ix, where I is, as usual, the identity matrix. So, the equation is
equivalent to Ax = Ix, or AxIx = 0, which is equivalent to (AI)x = 0. Now,
a square linear system Bx = 0 has solutions other than x = 0 precisely when |B| = 0.
Therefore, taking B = A I, is an eigenvalue if and only if the determinant of
the matrix A I is zero. This determinant, p() = |A I|, is known as the
characteristic polynomial of A, since it is a polynomial in the variable . To find
the eigenvalues, we solve the equation |A I| = 0. Let us illustrate with a very
simple 2 2 example.

Example: Let  
1 1
A= .
2 2
Then      
1 1 1 0 1 1
A I = =
1 2 0 1 2 2
and the characteristic polynomial is

1 1
|A I| =

2 2
= (1 )(2 ) 2
= 2 3 + 2 2 = 2 3.

So the eigenvalues are the solutions of 2 3 = 0. To solve this, one could use either
the formula for the solutions to a quadratic, or simply observe that the equation is
( 3) = 0 with solutions = 0 and = 3. Hence the eigenvalues of A are 0 and 3.

## To find an eigenvector for eigenvalue , we have to find a solution to (A I)x = 0,

other than the zero vector. (I stress the fact that eigenvectors cannot be the
zero vector because this is a mistake many students make.) This is easy, since for a
particular value of , all we need to do is solve a simple linear system We illustrate
by finding the eigenvectors for the matrix of the example just given.

## Example: We find eigenvectors of

 
1 1
A= .
2 2

We have seen that the eigenvalues are 0 and 3. To find an eigenvector for eigenvalue
0 we solve the system (A 0I)x = 0: that is, Ax = 0, or
    
1 1 x1 0
= .
2 2 x2 0

This could be solved using row operations. (Note that it cannot be solved by us-
ing inverse matrices since A is not invertible. In fact, inverse matrix techniques or

38
Cramers rule will never be of use here since being an eigenvalue means that A I
is not invertible.) However, we can solve this fairly directly just by looking at the
equations. We have to solve
x1 + x2 = 0, 2x1 + 2x2 = 0.
Clearly both equations are equivalent. From either one, we obtain x1 = x2 . We can
choose x2 to be any number we like. Lets take x2 = 1; then we need x1 = x2 = 1.
It follows that an eigenvector for 0 is
 
1
x= .
1
The choice x2 = 1 was arbitrary; we could have chosen any non-zero number, so, for
example, the following are eigenvectors for 0:
   
2 5.2
, .
2 5.2
There are infinitely many eigenvectors for 0: for each 6= 0,
 

is an eigenvector for 0. But be careful not to think that you can choose = 0; for
then x becomes the zero vector, and this is never an eigenvector, simply by definition.
To find an eigenvector for 3, we solve (A 3I)x = 0, which is
    
2 1 x1 0
= .
2 1 x2 0
This is equivalent to the equations
2x1 + x2 = 0, 2x1 x2 = 0,
which are together equivalent to the single equation x2 = 2x1 . If we choose x1 = 1,
we obtain the eigenvector  
1
x= .
2
(Again, any non-zero scalar multiple of this vector is also an eigenvector for eigenvalue
3.)

We illustrated with a 2 2 example just for simplicity, but you should be able to work
with 3 3 matrices. We give three such examples.

## Example: Suppose that

4 0 4
A = 0 4 4.
4 4 8
Find the eigenvalues of A and obtain one eigenvector for each eigenvalue.

## To find the eigenvalues we solve |A I| = 0. Now,

4 0 4

|A I| = 0 4 4
4 4 8

4 4 0 4
= (4 ) + 4
4 8 4 4
= (4 ) ((4 )(8 ) 16) + 4 (4(4 ))
= (4 ) ((4 )(8 ) 16) 16(4 ).

39
Now, we notice that each of the two terms in this expression has 4 as a factor, so
instead of expanding everything, we take 4 out as a common factor, obtaining

## |A I| = (4 ) ((4 )(8 ) 16 16)

= (4 )(32 12 + 2 32)
= (4 )(2 12)
= (4 )( 12).

It follows that the eigenvalues are 4, 0, 12. (The characteristic polynomial will not
always factorise so easily. Here it was simple because of the common factor (4 ).
The next example is more difficult.) To find an eigenvector for 4, we have to solve
the equation (A 4I)x = 0, that is,

0 0 4 x1 0
0 0 4 x2 = 0 .
4 4 4 x3 0

Of course, we could use row operations, but the system is simple enough to solve
straight away. The equations are

4x3 = 0
4x3 = 0
4x1 + 4x2 + 4x3 = 0,

1
1 .
0

## (Again, we can choose x1 to be any non-negative number. So the eigenvalues for

eigenvalue 4 are all non-zero multiples of this vector.)

Activity 3.1 Determine eigenvectors for 0 and 12. You should find that for = 0,
your eigenvector is a non-zero multiple of

1
1
1

## and that for = 12 your eigenvector is a non-zero multiple of

1
1.
2

Example: Let
3 1 2
A = 1 1 1.
1 1 0
Given that 1 is an eigenvalue of A, find all the eigenvalues of A.

40
We calculate the characteristic polynomial of A:

3 1 2

|A I| = 1 1 1
1 1 0

1 1 1 1 1 1
= (3 ) (1)
2

1 1 1 1
= (3 )(2 + 1) + ( 1) 2(2 + )
= 3 42 5 2.
Now, the fact that 1 is an eigenvalue means that 1 is a solution of the equation
|A I| = 0, which means that ( (1)), that is, ( + 1), is a factor of the
characteristic polynomial |A I|. So this characteristic polynomial can be written
in the form
( + 1)(a2 + b + c).
Clearly we must have a = 1 and c = 2 to obtain the correct 3 term and the
correct constant. Given this, b = 3. In other words, the characteristic polynomial
is
( + 1)(2 3 2) = ( + 1)(2 + 3 + 2) = ( + 1)( + 2)( + 1).
That is, |A I| = ( + 1)2 ( + 2). The eigenvalues are the solutions to |A I| = 0,
so they are = 1 and = 2. Note that in this case, there are only two eigenvalues
(or, the eigenvalue 1 is repeated, or has multiplicity 2, as it is sometimes said).

Example: Let
3 1 1
A = 0 2 0.
1 1 3
Then (check this!), the characteristic polynomial is 3 + 802 20 + 16. This
factorises (check!) as
( 2)( 2)( 4),
so the eigenvalues are 2 and 4. There are only two eigenvalues in this case. (We
sometimes say that the eigenvalue 2 is repeated or has multiplicity 2, because
( 2)2 is a factor of the characteristic polynomial.) To find an eigenvector for = 4,
we have to solve the equation (A 4I)x = 0, that is,

1 1 1 x1 0
0 2 0 x2 = 0 .
1 1 1 x3 0
The equations are
x1 x2 + x3 = 0
2x2 = 0
x1 x2 x3 = 0,
so x2 = 0 and x1 = x3 . Choosing x3 = 1, we get the eigenvector

1
0.
1
For = 2, we have to solve the equation (A 2I)x = 0, that is,

1 1 1 x1 0
0 0 0 x2 = 0 .
1 1 1 x3 0

41
This system is equivalent to the single equation x1 x2 +x3 = 0. (Convince yourself!)
Choosing x3 = 1 and x2 = 0 we have x1 = 1, so we obtain the eigenvector

1
0.
1

Complex eigenvalues

Although we shall only deal in this subject with real matrices (that is, matrices
whose entries are real numbers), it is possible for such real matrices to have complex
eigenvalues. This is not something you have to spend much time on, but you have
to be aware of it. We briefly describe complex numbers.1 The complex numbers 1
For more discussion of
are based on the complex number i, which is defined to be the square root of 1. complex numbers, see
(Of course, no such real number exists.) Any complex number z can be written in Appendix A3 of Simon and
the form z = a + bi where a, b are real numbers. We call a the real part and b Blume.
the imaginary part of z. Of course, any real number is a complex number, since
a = a + 0i. The following example shows a 2 2 matrix with complex eigenvalues,
and it also demonstrates how to deal with complex numbers.
 
1 1
Example: Consider the matrix A = . We shall see that it has complex
9 1
eigenvalues. First, the characteristic polynomial |AI| is (1)2 +9 = 2 2+10.
(Check this!) Using the formula for the roots of a quadratic equation, the eigenvalues
are
2 36
.
2
Now p
36 = (36)(1) = 36 1 = 6 1 = 6i.
So the eigenvalues are the complex numbers 1 + 3i and 1 3i. Lets proceed with
finding eigenvectors. To find an eigenvector for 1 + 3i, we solve (A (1 + 3i)I)x = 0,
which is     
3i 1 x1 0
= .
9 3i x2 0
This is equivalent to the equations

## 3ix1 + x2 = 0, 9x1 3ix2 = 0.

But the second equation is just 3i times the first, so both are equivalent. Taking
the second, we see that x1 = i/3x2 . So an eigenvector is (taking x2 = 3) (i, 3)T .
For = 1 3i, we end up solving the system

## a solution of which is (i, 3)T .

You should be aware, then, that even though we are not dealing with matrices that
have complex numbers as their entries, the possibility still exists that eigenvalues
(and eigenvectors) will involve complex numbers. However, if a matrix is symmetric
(that is, it equals its transpose), then it certainly has real eigenvalues. This useful
fact, which we shall prove later, is important when we consider quadratic forms in
the next chapter.

42
Diagonalisation of a square matrix

Square matrices A and B are similar if there is an invertible matrix P such that
P 1 AP = B.

## The matrix A is diagonalisable if it is similar to a diagonal matrix; in other words,

if there is a diagonal matrix D and an invertible matrix P such that P 1 AP = D.

## Suppose that matrix A is diagonalisable, and that P 1 AP = D, where D is a diagonal

matrix
1 0 0

0 2 0
D = diag(1 , 2 , . . . , n ) = .. .
0 0 . 0
0 0 n
(Note the useful notation for describing the diagonal matrix D.) Then we have
AP = DP . If the columns of P are the vectors v1 , v2 , . . . , vn , then

## AP = A (v1 . . . vn ) = (Av1 . . . Avn ),

and
1 0 0

0 2 0
DP = .. (v1 . . . vn ) = (1 v1 . . . n vn ) .
0 0 . 0
0 0 n
So this means that

## Av1 = 1 v1 , Av2 = 2 v2 , . . . , Avn = n vn .

The fact that P 1 exists means that none of the vectors vi is the zero vector. So
this means that (for i = 1, 2, . . . , n) i is an eigenvalue of A and vi is a corresponding
eigenvector. Since P has an inverse, these eigenvectors are linearly independent.
Therefore, A has n linearly independent eigenvectors. Conversely, if A has n linearly
independent eigenvectors, then the matrix P whose columns are these eigenvectors
will be invertible, and we will have P 1 AP = D where D is a diagonal matrix with
entries equal to the eigenvalues of A. We have therefore established the following
result.

## Theorem 3.1 A matrix A is diagonalisable if and only if it has n linearly independent

eigenvectors. Suppose that this is the case, and let v1 , . . . , vn be n linearly independent
eigenvectors, where vi is an eigenvector for eigenvalue i . Then the matrix P =
(v1 . . . vn ) is such that P 1 exists, and P 1 AP = D where D = diag(1 , . . . , n ).

basis and matrix representations of linear transformations. Suppose that T is the
linear transformation corresponding to A, so that T (x) = Ax for all x. Suppose that
A has a set of n linearly independent eigenvectors B = {x1 , x2 , . . . , xn }, corresponding
(respectively) to the eigenvalues 1 , . . . , n . Since this is a linearly independent set
of size n in Rn , B is a basis for Rn . By Theorem 2.18, the matrix of T with respect
to B is
AT [B, B] = ([T (x1 )]B . . . [T (xn )]B ) .
But T (xi ) = Axi = xi , so the coordinate vector of T (xi ) with respect to B is

## [T (xi )]B = (0, 0, . . . , 0, i , 0, . . . , 0),

43
which has i in entry i and all other entries zero. Therefore

AT [B, B] = diag(1 , . . . , n ) = D.

## But by Theorem 2.20, AT [B, B] = P 1 AT P, where

P = (x1 . . . xn )

and AT is the matrix representing T , which in this case is simply A itself. We therefore
see that
P 1 AP = AT [B, B] = D,
and so the matrix P diagonalises A.

## Example: Consider again the matrix

4 0 4
A = 0 4 4.
4 4 8

We have seen that it has three distinct eigenvalues 0, 4, 12, and that eigenvectors
corresponding to eigenvalues 4, 0, 12 are (in that order)

1 1 1
1 , 1 , 1 .
0 1 2

## We now form the matrix P whose columns are these eigenvectors:

1 1 1
P = 1 1 1.
0 1 2

Then, according to the theory, P should have an inverse, and we should have P 1 AP =
D = diag(4, 0, 12). To check that this is true, we could calculate P 1 and evaluate
the product. The inverse may be calculated using either elementary row operations
or determinants. (Matrix inversion is not part of this subject: however, it is part of
the pre-requisite subject Mathematics for economists. You should therefore know
how to invert a matrix.)

example shows.

## Example: The 2 2 matrix  

4 1
A=
1 2
has characteristic polynomial 2 6 + 9 = ( 3)2 , so there is only one eigenvalue,
= 3. The eigenvectors are the non-zero solutions to (A 3I)x = 0: that is,
    
1 1 x1 0
= .
1 1 x2 0

## This is equivalent to the single equation x1 + x2 = 0, with general solution x1 =

x2 . Setting x2 = r, we see that the solution set of the system consists of all

44
 
r
vectors of the form as r runs through all non-zero real numbers. So the
r  
1
eigenvectors are precisely the non-zero scalar multiples of the fixed vector .
1
Any two eigenvectors are therefore multiples of each other and hence form a linearly
dependent set. In other words, there are not two linearly independent eigenvectors,
and the matrix is not diagonalisable.

The following result is useful. It shows that if a matrix has n different eigenvalues
then it is diagonalisable.2 2
For a proof, see
Ostaszewski, Mathematics
in Economics, Section 7.4.
Theorem 3.2 Eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues are linearly inde-
pendent. So if an n n matrix has n different eigenvalues, then it has a set of n
linearly independent eigenvectors and is therefore diagonalisable.

It is not, however, necessary for the eigenvalues to be distinct. What is needed for
diagonalisation is a set of n linearly independent eigenvectors, and this can happen
even when there is a repeated eigenvalue (that is, when there are fewer than n
different eigenvalues). The following example illustrates this.

## Example: We considered the matrix

3 1 1
A = 0 2 0
1 1 3

above, and we saw that it has only two eigenvalues, 4 and 2. If we want to diago-
nalise it, we need to find three linearly independent eigenvectors. We found that an
eigenvector corresponding to = 4 is

1
0,
1

and that, for = 2, the eigenvectors are given by the non-zero-vector solutions to
the system consisting of just the single equation x1 x2 + x3 = 0. Above, we simply
wanted to find an eigenvector, but now we want to find two which, together with
the eigenvector for = 4, form a linearly independent set. Now, the system for the
eigenvectors corresponding to = 2 has just one equation and is therefore of rank 1;
it follows that the solution set is two-dimensional. Lets see exactly what the general
solution looks like. We have x1 = x2 x3 , and x2 , x3 can be chosen independently of
each other. Setting x3 = r and x2 = s, we see that the general solution is

x1 sr 1 1
x2 = s = s 1 + r 0 , (r, s R).
x3 r 0 1

This shows that the solution space (the eigenspace, as it is called in this instance)
is spanned by the two linearly independent vectors

1 1
1, 0.
0 1

## Now, each of these is an eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue 2 and, together with

our eigenvector for = 4, the three form a linearly independent set. So there are

45
three linearly independent eigenvectors, even though two of them correspond to the
same eigenvalue. The matrix is therefore diagonalisable. We may take

1 1 1
P = 0 1 0.
1 0 1

## The matrix we considered above,

4 0 4
A = 0 4 4,
4 4 8

is symmetric: that is, its transpose AT is equal to itself. It turns out that such
matrices are always diagonalisable. They are, furthermore, diagonalisable in a special
way. A matrix P is orthogonal if P T P = P P T = I: that is, if P has inverse P T .
A matrix A is said to be orthogonally diagonalisable if there is an orthogonal
matrix P such that P T AP = D where D is a diagonal matrix. Note that P T = P 1 ,
so P T AP = P 1 AP . The argument given above shows that the columns of P must
be n linearly independent eigenvectors of A. But the condition that P T P = I means
something else, as we now discuss.

## Suppose that the columns of P are x1 , x2 , . . . , xn , so that P = (x1 x2 . . . xn ). Then

the rows of the transpose P T are xT1 , . . . , xTn , so
xT
1

T
xT2
P =
.. .

.
xTn
Calculating the matrix product P T P , we find that the (i, j)-entry of P T P is xTi xj .
But, since P T P = I, we must have
xTi xi = 1 (i = 1, 2, . . . , n), xTi xj = 0 (i 6= j).

## We say that vectors x, y are orthogonal if the matrix product xT y is 0. (Orthogonal-

ity will be discussed in more detail later.) So, any two of the eigenvectors x1 , . . . , xn
must be orthogonal. Furthermore, for i = 1, 2, . . . , n, xTi xi = 1. The length of a
vector x is v
u n
uX
kxk = t x2i = xT x.
i=1

So, not only must any two of these eigenvectors be orthogonal, but each must have
length 1.

We shall discuss orthogonality in more detail in the next chapter. For the moment,
we have the following result.

## Theorem 3.3 If the matrix A is symmetric (AT = A) then eigenvectors correspond-

ing to different eigenvalues are orthogonal.

46
Proof Suppose that and are any two different eigenvalues of A and that x, y are
corresponding eigenvectors. Then Ax = x and Ay = y. The trick in this proof is
to find two different expressions for the product xT Ay (which then must, of course,
be equal to each other). Note that the matrix product xT Ay is a 1 1 matrix or,
equivalently, a number. First, since Ay = y, we have
xT Ay = xT (y) = xT y.
But also, since Ax = x, we have (Ax)T = (x)T = xT . Now, for any matrices
M, N , (M N )T = N T M T , so (Ax)T = xT AT . But AT = A (because A is symmetric),
so xT A = xT and hence
xT Ay = xT y.
We therefore have two different expressions for xT Ay: it equals xT y and xT y.
Hence,
xT y = xT y,
or
( )xT y = 0.
But since 6= (they are different eigenvalues), we have 6= 0. We deduce,
therefore, that xT y = 0. But this says precisely that x and y are orthogonal, which
is exactly what we wanted to prove.

## This is quite a sneaky proof: the trick is to remember to consider xT Ay.

The result just presented shows that if an n n symmetric matrix has exactly n
different eigenvalues then any n corresponding eigenvectors are orthogonal to one
another. Since we may take the eigenvectors to have length 1, this shows that the
matrix is orthogonally diagonalisable. The following result makes this precise.

## Theorem 3.4 Suppose that A has n different eigenvalues. Take n corresponding

eigenvectors,
pPn each of length 1. (Recall that the length of a vector x is just kxk =
2
i=1 xi .) Form the matrix P which has these eigenvectors as its columns. Then
P 1 = P T (that is, P is an orthogonal matrix) and P T AP = D, the diagonal
matrix whose entries are the eigenvalues of A.

(Note that we have only shown here that symmetric matrices with n different eigen-
values are orthogonally diagonalisable, but it turns out that all symmetric matrices
are orthogonally diagonalisable.)

## Example: We work with the same matrix we used earlier,

4 0 4
A = 0 4 4.
4 4 8
As we have already observed, this is symmetric. We have seen that it has three distinct
eigenvalues 0, 4, 12. Earlier, we found that eigenvectors for eigenvalues 4, 0, 12 are (in
that order)
1 1 1
1 , 1 , 1 .
0 1 2

Activity 3.3 Convince yourself that any two of these three eigenvectors are orthog-
onal.

47
Now,
p these eigenvectors
are not of length 1. For example,
the first one has length
12 + (1)2 + 02 = 2. If we divide each entry of it by 2, we will indeed obtain
an eigenvector of length 1:
1/2
1/ 2 .
0
We can similarly normalise the other two vectors, obtaining

1/3 1/6
1/ 3 , 1/ 6 .

1/ 3 2/ 6

## Activity 3.4 Make sure you understand this normalisation.

We now form the matrix P whose columns are these normalised eigenvectors:

1/ 2 1/3 1/6
P = 1/ 2 1/ 3 1/6 .
0 1/ 3 2/ 6

## Activity 3.5 Check that P is orthogonal by calculating P T P .

Example: Let
7 0 9
A = 0 2 0.
9 0 7
Note that A is symmetric. We find an orthogonal matrix P such that P T AP is a
diagonal matrix. The characteristic polynomial of A is

7 0 9

|A I| = 0 2 0
9 0 7
= (2 )[(7 )(7 ) 81]
= (2 )(2 14 32)
= (2 )( 16)( + 2),
where we have expanded the determinant using the middle row. So the eigenvalues
are 2, 16, 2. An eigenvector for = 2 is given by
5x + 9z = 0, 9x + 5z = 0.
This means x = z = 0. So we may take (0, 1, 0)T . This already has length 1 so
there is no need to normalise it. (Recall that we need three eigenvectors which are
of length 1.) For = 2 we find that an eigenvector is (1, 0, 1)T (or some multiple
of
this). To normalise (that is, to make of length 1), we divide by its length, which
is 2, obtaining (1/ 2)(1, 0, 1)T . For = 16, we find a normalised eigenvector is
(1/ 2)(1, 0, 1). It follows that if we let

0 1/ 2 1/ 2
P = 1 0 0 ,
0 1/ 2 1/ 2

## then P is orthogonal and P T AP = D = diag(2, 2, 16). Check this!

48
Learning outcomes

This chapter has discussed eigenvalues and eigenvectors and the very important tech-
nique of diagonalisation. We shall see in the next chapter how useful a technique
diagonalisation is.

At the end of this chapter and the relevant reading, you should be able to:

## explain what is meant by eigenvectors and eigenvalues, and by diagonalisation

find eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors for a square matrix
diagonalise a diagonalisable matrix
recognise what diagonalisation says in terms of change of basis and matrix
representation of linear transformations
perform orthogonal diagonalisation on a symmetric matrix that has distinct
eigenvalues.

## Question 3.1 Find the eigenvalues of the matrix

0 2 1
A = 16 4 6
16 4 10
and find an eigenvector for each eigenvalue. Hence find an invertible matrix P and a
diagonal matrix D such that P 1 AP = D.

 
1 1
Question 3.2 Prove that the matrix is not diagonalizable.
0 1

## Question 3.3 Let A be any (real) n n matrix and suppose is an eigenvalue of A.

Show that {x : Ax = x}, the set of eigenvectors for eigenvalue together with the
zero-vector 0, is a subspace of Rn .

## Question 3.4 Let

1 1 2
A = 6 2 6.
0 1 1
Show that the vector
1
x = 0
1
is an eigenvector of A. What is the corresponding eigenvalue? Find the other eigen-
values of A, and an eigenvector for each of them. Find an invertible matrix P and a
diagonal matrix D such that P 1 AP = D.

49
Question 3.5 Let
0 0 2
A = 1 2 1.
1 0 3
Find an invertible matrix P and a diagonal matrix D such that P 1 AP = D.

## Question 3.6 Let

2 1 1
A = 1 1 0.
1 0 1
Find the eigenvalues of A, and an eigenvector for each of them. Find an orthogonal
matrix P and a diagonal matrix D such that P T AP = D.

Question 3.7 Suppose that A is a real diagonalisable matrix and that all the eigen-
values of A are non-negative. Prove that there is a matrix B such that B 2 = A.

Question 3.1 The characteristic polynomial is 3 + 142 48, which is easily fac-
torised as (6)(8). So the eigenvalues are 0, 6, 8. Corresponding eigenvectors,
respectively, are calculated to be (and non-zero multiples of)

## We may therefore take

1/2 1/2 1/4
P = 1/2 1 1 , D = diag(0, 6, 8).
1 1 0

Question 3.2 You can check that the only eigenvalue is 1 and that the corresponding
eigenvectors are all the scalar multiples of (1, 0)T . So there cannot be two linearly
independent eigenvectors, and hence the matrix is not diagonalisable.

Question 3.3 Denote the set described by W . First, 0 W . Suppose now that x, y
are in W and that R. We need to show that x + y and x are also in W . We
know that Ax = x and Ay = y, so

A(x + y) = Ax + Ay = x + y = (x + y)

and
A(x) = (Ax) = (x) = (x),
so x + y and x are indeed in W .

## Question 3.4 It is given that x is an eigenvector. To determine the corresponding

eigenvalue we work out Ax. This should be x where is the required eigenvalue.
Performing the calculation, we see that Ax = x and so = 1. The characteristic

50
polynomial of A is p() = 3 + 22 + 2. Since = 1 is a root, we know that
( 1) is a factor. Factorising, we obtain
p() = ( 1)(2 + + 2) = ( 1)( 2)( + 1),
so the other eigenvalues are = 2, 1. Corresponding eigenvectors are, respectively,
(1, 1, 1)T and (0, 2, 1)T . We may therefore take

1 1 0
P = 0 1 2 , D = diag(1, 2, 1).
1 1 1

Question 3.5 This is slightly more complicated since there are not 3 distinct eigen-
values. The eigenvalues turn out to be 1 and 2, with two occurring twice. An
eigenvector for 1 is (2, 1, 1)T . We need to find a set of 3 linearly independent eigen-
vectors, so we need another two coming from the eigenspace corresponding to 2. You
should find that the eigenspace for = 2 is two-dimensional and has a basis consisting
of (1, 0, 1)T and (0, 1, 0)T . These two vectors together with (2, 1, 1)T do indeed
form a linearly independent set. Therefore we may take

2 1 0
P = 1 0 1 , D = diag(1, 2, 2).
1 1 0

## Question 3.6 The characteristic polynomial turns out to be

p() = 3 + 42 3 = ( 3)( 1),
so the eigenvalues are 0, 1, 3. Corresponding eigenvectors are, respectively,
(1, 1, 1)T , (0, 1, 1)T , (2, 1, 1)T .
To perform orthogonal diagonalisation (rather than simply diagonalisation) we need
to normalise these (that is, make them of length
1 by
dividing each by its length). The
lengths of the vectors are (respectively), 3, 2, 6, so the normalised eigenvectors
are
(1/ 3, 1/ 3, 1/ 3)T , (0, 1/ 2, 1/ 2)T , (2/ 6, 1/ 6, 1/ 6)T .
If we take
1/3 0 2/6
P = 1/3 1/2 1/6 ,
1/ 3 1/ 2 1/ 6
then
P 1 AP = diag(0, 1, 3) = D.

## Question 3.7 Since A can be diagonalised, we have P 1 AP = D for some P , where

D = diag(1 , . . . , n ), these entries being the eigenvalues of A. It is given that all
i 0. We have A = P DP 1 . Let
p p p
B = P diag( 1 , 2 , . . . , n )P 1 .
Then
p p p p p p
B2 = P diag( 2 , . . . , n )P 1 P diag( 1 , 2 , . . . , n )P 1
1 ,
p 2 p 2 p 2
= P diag( 1 , 2 , . . . , n )P 1
= P DP 1 = A,
and we are done.

51