Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ISSN: 2309-7892, Page: 65-74, Volume 01, Issue 02, January-March 2014
Review Paper
M.S. Islam, H. Mehraj, M.Z.K. Roni, T. Taufique, and A.F.M. Jamal Uddin*1
M.S. Islam, H. Mehraj, M.Z.K. Roni, T. Taufique, and A.F.M. Jamal Uddin (2014). Flora of Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural
University. Int. J. Bus., Soc. and Sci. Res. 01(02):65-74. Retrieve from http://www.ijbssr.com/currentissueview/13090112
Abstract
A taxonomic survey was performed to assess diversity of plant resources at Sher-e-
Bangla Agricultural University (SAU) campus, Dhaka, Bangladesh during August 2011
to October 2012. A total of 8536 (including seasonal) species were recorded in SAU.
Plants were represented by trees (11.0 %), shrubs (21.6 %), herbs (61.6 %), climbers (4.0
%) and woody grasses (1.8%). The total number of plants belongs to 257 species under
215 genera and 135 families among these 126, 46, 17, 15, 29, 10 and 14 plant species
were existed under 112, 34, 12, 12, 27, 7 and 11 genera also under 57, 25, 8, 9, 25, 7 and
4 family in terms of ornamental, fruit, vegetables, spices, medicinal, timber and
plantation crop respectively.
Key words: Plant resources, germplasm, SAU.
Introduction
Flora is naturally occurring or indigenous native plant life in a particular region or time which
traditionally has two components: richness of species and evenness of distribution of numbers
among species. A positive impact of species diversity on plant productivity has been explained by
the complementarily of resource use among plant species or their functional groups (Diaz and
Cabido, 2001; Dukes, 2001; Loreau and Hector, 2001; Tilman et al., 1996). It has been argued
that increase in plant diversity will increase the probability of including highly productive species
into the plant community (Huston 1997, Leps et al., 2001). Bangladesh is well known to have
wide variety of plant species that are scattered in natural forests, villages, gardens, and jungles.
Unfortunately, these valuable plant genetic resources have not been well studied and so far, only a
few species have ever been evaluated for their medicinal, horticultural, and agricultural potentials.
Changes in flora affect several ecosystem processes, such as primary productivity, nutrient
retention, and vegetation dynamics (Naeem et al., 1996; Tilman et al., 1996; Hector et al., 1999;
Schlapfer and Schmid, 1999; Tilman, 1999; Chapin et al., 2000 and Loreau et al., 2001).
Bangladesh is one of the most populous countries of the world having 142 million (BBS, 2011)
people and the current population growth rate is 1.6%. Under this situation, plant resources are
very important for serving food, wood and others. But it is unfortunate that there is a loss of plant
resources worldwide including Bangladesh (IUCN, 1990) and it has been a common concern of
mankind which is a threat in agriculture, environment and forest. Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural
University maintain a wide range of flora. Therefore, a study was conducted to prepare a list of
plant species under different taxa and to evaluate the plant genetic resources present at Sher-e-
Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Materials and Method
Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (SAU) covers 86 acre land located at Dhaka, Bangladesh.
An empirical survey was conducted to assure the plant resources of plant species at SAU under
this study (Appendix 1). Data were collected during August 2011 to October 2012. The work
consisted of basic methodological approaches and survey. The flora of the study area was listed
and every species was identified and recorded separately. Different taxonomic books were
consulted (Randhawa and Mukhopadhyay, 1986; Mukherjee and Gangulee, 1964; Kurz, 1974a;
Kurz, 1974b; Rashid, 1990; Khan et al., 1988; Haque, 1993; Gruezo, 1995) for compilation of
scientific names and relevant information.
http://www.ijbssr.com
Flora of SAU 67
Table 2. Total number of ornamental plants and their percentage under each family
No of No of No of
Family % Family % Family %
Plants Plants Plants
Amaranthaceae 111 2.4 Cycadaceae 21 0.5 Nyctaginaceae 38 0.8
Amaryllidaceae 433 9.3 Ericaceae 21 0.5 Nymphaeaceae 16 0.3
Annonaceae 73 1.6 Euphorbiaceae 583 12.6 Oleaceae 34 0.7
Apocynaceae 131 2.8 Fabaceae 15 0.3 Onagraceae 23 0.5
Araceae 140 3.0 Gentianaceae 5 0.1 Orchidaceae 88 1.9
Araucariaceae 14 0.3 Gramineae 47 1.0 Paeoniaceae 1 0.02
Asteraceae 180 3.9 Heliconiaceae 70 1.5 Passifloraceae 8 0.2
Balsaminaceae 89 1.9 Iridaceae 110 2.4 Pinaceae 47 1.0
Bignoniaceae 12 0.3 Labiatae 103 2.2 Polemoniaceae 3 0.1
Cactaceae 26 0.6 Liliaceae 58 1.3 Polygonaceae 1 0.02
Caesalpiniaceae 38 0.8 Lycithidaceae 6 0.1 Polypodiaceae 33 0.7
Caprifoliaceae 2 0.04 Lythraceae 91 2.0 Rosaceae 220 4.7
Caryophyllaceae 35 0.8 Magnoliaceae 11 0.2 Rubiaceae 251 5.4
Casuarinaceae 28 0.6 Malpighiaceae 2 0.04 Rutaceae 4 0.1
Celastraceae 1 0.02 Malvaceae 52 1.1 Sapotaceae 9 0.2
Commelinaceae 140 3.0 Mimosaceae 16 0.3 Scrophulariaceae 19 0.4
Compositae 831 17.9 Moraceae 90 1.9 Solanaceae 56 1.2
Convolvulaceae 30 0.7 Musaceae 5 0.1 Verbenaceae 150 3.2
Cyatheaceae 2 0.04 Myrtaceae 4 0.1 Violaceae 18 0.4
Total 4645 100
Number of plants and percentage of total plants under each family for timber: Maximum 33
plants were observed under Maliaceae family followed by Mimosaceae (27 plants) which
comprised 33.3 and 27.3% of total timber plants respectively whereas minimum from Fabaceae (3
plants) family comprised 3.0% of total timber plants (Table 4).
Number of plants and percentage of total plants under each family for medicinals: Maximum
57 plants were observed under Asclepiadaceae family followed by Labiatae (53 plants) which
comprised 16.8 and 15.6% of total medicinal plants respectively and minimum (single plant) from
Vitaceae, Menispermaceae, Zingiberaceae family comprised 0.3% of total medicinal plants (Table
5).
Table 3. Total number of fruit plants and percentage of total plants under each family
No of
Family No of plants % Family %
plants
Actinidiaceae 1.0 0.1 Malvaceae 1.0 0.1
Anacardiaceae 108.0 13.3 Moraceae 37.0 4.6
Annonaceae 27.0 3.3 Musaceae 51.0 6.3
Apocynaceae 1.0 0.1 Myrtaceae 44.0 5.4
Averrhoaceae 28.0 3.5 Passifloraceae 3.0 0.4
Bromeliaceae 14.0 1.7 Punicaceae 9.0 1.1
Caricaceae 41.0 5.1 Rhamnaceae 32.0 4.0
Dilleniaceae 3.0 0.4 Rosaceae 250.0 30.9
Ebenaceae 4.0 0.5 Rutaceae 101.0 12.5
Elaeocarpaceae 16.0 2.0 Sapindaceae 8.0 1.0
Euphorbiaceae 3.0 0.4 Sapotaceae 2.0 0.3
Fabaceae 10.0 1.2 Vitaceae 15.0 1.9
Lauraceae 1.0 0.1 Total 810.0 100
http://www.ijbssr.com
Islam et al. 68
Table 4. Total number of timber plants and percentage of total plants under each family
Family No of plants %
Annonaceae 4.0 4.0
Boraginaceae 19.0 19.2
Fabaceae 3.0 3.0
Vitaceae 7.0 7.1
Mimosaceae 27.0 27.3
Maliaceae 33.0 33.3
Verbenaceae 6.0 6.1
Total 99 100
Number of plants and percentage of total plants under each family for spices: Maximum 531
plants were found under Zingiberaceae family followed by Solanaceae (377 plants) and
Amaryllidaceae (226 plants) which comprised 43.7, 31.0 and 18.6% of total spices plants
respectively and minimum (single plant) from to Rutaceae, Myrtaceae family comprised 0.08% of
total spices plants (Table 6).
Table 5. Total number of medicinal plants and it's percentage under each family
No of No of
Family % Family %
Plant Plant
Acanthaceae 3 0.9 Gentianaceae 7 2.1
Apocynaceae 16 4.7 Guttiferae 4 1.2
Asclepiadaceae 57 16.8 Labiatae 53 15.6
Asparagaceae 32 9.4 Lamiaceae 14 4.1
Bixaceae 28 8.3 Liliaceae 3 0.9
Caesalpinae 2 0.6 Mackinlayaceae 31 9.1
Combretaceae 5 1.5 Meliaceae 29 8.6
Convolvulaceae 2 0.6 Menispermaceae 1 0.3
Crassulaceae 17 5.0 Solanaceae 2 0.6
Cucurbitaceae 6 1.8 Sterculiaceae 2 0.6
Dioscoreaceae 2 0.6 Vitaceae 1 0.3
Fabaceae 21 6.2 Zingiberaceae 1 0.3
Total 339 100
Number of plants and percentage of total plants under each family for vegetables: Maximum
364 plants were observed under Brassicaceae family followed by Asparagaceae (320 plants)
which comprised 33.7 and 29.6% of total vegetables plants respectively while minimum from
Moringaceae (13 plants) comprised 1.2% of total vegetables plants (Table 7).
Number of plants and percentage of total plants under each family for plantation crop:
Observation showed that bamboo and rubber plant category both were occupied in a single family
naming Gramineae (152 plants) and Moraceae (2 plants) that comprised 43.8 and 0.6% of total
plantation crops. On the other hand palm category was occupied two family Arecaceae (81 plants)
and Palmae (112 plants) with 23.3 and 32.3% respectively (Table 8).
Table 6. Total number of spices and their Table 7. Total number of vegetables and
percentage under each family their percentage under each family
No of No. of
Family % Family %
plants plants
Aracae 8 0.7 Apiaceae 56 5.2
Amaryllidaceae 226 18.6 Asparagaceae 320 29.6
Apiaceae 59 4.9 Brassicaceae 364 33.7
Lauraceae 10 0.8 Cucurbitaceae 83 7.7
Myrtaceae 1 0.1 Fabaceae 24 2.2
Piperaceae 3 0.3 Malvaceae 72 6.7
Rutaceae 1 0.1 Moringaceae 13 1.2
Solanaceae 377 31.0 Solanaceae 148 13.7
Zingiberaceae 531 43.7
Total 1216 100 Total 1080 100
http://www.ijbssr.com
Flora of SAU 69
Table 8. Total number of plantation crops and their percentage under each family
Family No of plants %
Arecaceae (palm) 81 23.3
Gramineae (Bamboo) 152 43.8
Moraceae (rubber) 2 0.6
Palmae (plam) 112 32.3
Total 347 100
Conclusion
The present study revealed a total of 8536 plants with 135 families, 215 genus and 257 species
present at SAU. Ornamentals consisted of 126 species under 112 genera and 57 families (one was
rare and endangered). A total of 15 species of spice plants contained 12 genera and 9 families.
Fruits consisted of 46 species under 34 genera and 25 families (2 were rare and endangered).
Vegetables were of 17 species under 12 genera and 8 families. Timber plants had 10 species
under 7 genera and 7 families. 29 medicinal species consisted 27 genera and 25 families (6 were
rare and endangered). Within the plantation crops, 5 bamboo species comprise d 2 genera under a
single family and 8 palm species comprised 8 genera and 2 families. Single rubber plant species
were listed under a single genera and family. Different plant categories had various habits with
diverse species, genera and families including a good number of rare and endangered species that
have been maintained at SAU.
References
BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics) Population and Housing Census: Preliminary Results.
2011. Monthly Bulletin (July). Minis. Plan. Govt. Peoples Repub. Bangladesh, Dhaka. pp.
3-4.
Chapin, F.S., E.S. Zavaleta and V.T. Eviner. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity.
Nature, 405: 234242.
Diaz, S. and M. Cabido, 2001. Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem
processes. Trends Ecol. Evol., 16: 646655.
Dukes, J.S. 2001. Productivity and complementarity in grassland microcosms of varying
diversity. Oikos, 94: 468480.
Gruezo, W.S. 1995. Botanical Garden Management Draft Final Report, WB-GOB Forest
Resources Management Project, Mandala Agric. Dev., Dhaka, Bangladesh. pp. 1-239.
Haque, S. 1993. Plant Names of National Botanical Garden, Mirpur, Dhaka. p. 1.44.
Hector, A., B. Schmid and C.M.C. Beierkuhnlein. 1999. Plant diversity and productivity
experiments in European grasslands. Science, 286: 11231127.
Huston, M.A. 1997. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem
function of biodiversity. Oecologia, 110: 440460.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). 1990.
Conservation the Worlds Biological Diversity. pp. 7-9.
Khan, M.S., M.M.K. Mia and A.M. Huq. 1988. Bulletin of the Bangladesh National Herbarium,
No. 3. Bangladesh Nat. Herb. BARC. pp. 1-10.
Kurz, S. 1974a. Forest Flora of British Burma. Vol. 1, M/S. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh
Road, New Cnaught place, Dehra Dun, Delhi. pp. 15-549.
Kurz, S. 1974b. Forest Flora of British Burma. Vol. 2, M/S. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh,
New Cnnaughat place, Dehra Dun, Delhi. pp. 1-57.
Leps, J., V.K. Brown and T.A. Daz. 2001. Separating the chance effect from diversity per se
effect in functioning of plant communities. Oikos, 92: 123134.
Loreau, M. and A. Hector. 2001. Partitioning selection and complementarity in diversity
experiments. Nature, 412: 7276.
Loreau, M., S. Naeem, P. Inchausti. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current
knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294: 804808.
Mukerjee, H. and A.K. Gangulee. 1964. Plant Groups. New Cent. Book Agency, Calcutta. pp.
630-990.
http://www.ijbssr.com
Islam et al. 70
Naeem, S., K. Hakanson and J.H. Lawton. 1996. Biodiversity and plant productivity in a model
assemblage of plant species. Oikos, 76: 259264.
Randhawa, G.S. and A. Mukhopadhyay. 1986. Floriculture in India. Allied Pub. Pvt. Ltd. New
Delhi. pp. 58-332.
Rashid, M. 1990. Fuler Chash. Bangla Acad, Dhaka, Bangladesh. pp. 34-172.
Schlapfer, F. and B. Schmid. 1999. Ecosystem effects of biodiversity: a classification of
hypotheses and exploration of empirical results. Ecol. Appl., 9: 893912.
Tilman, D. 1999. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general
principles. Ecology, 80: 14551474.
Tilman, D., D. Wedin and J. Knops. 1996. Productivity and sustainability influenced by
biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature, 379: 718720.
Apendix 1: Plant genetic resources of SAU with their respective common names, scientific
names, family and type
Common Name Scientific Name Family Type
Ornamental
Akashmoni (Golden Shower) Acacia auriculiformis Mimosaceae Tree
Alocasia Alocasia sp Araceae Herb
Alternanthera Alternanthera sp Amaranthaceae Herb
Amaranthus Amaranthus sp Amaranthaceae Herb
Angelonia Angelonia angustifolia Scrophulariaceae Shrub
Anonto Lota (Coral Vine) Antigonon leptopus Polygonaceae Climber
Anthurium Anthurium sp Araceae Herb
Aparajita (Butterfly Pea) Clitoria ternatea Fabaceae Climber
Aroceria (Crismass Tree) Araucaria sp Araucariaceae Tree
Aster Callistephus sp Compositae Herb
Beli/Arabian Jasmine Jasminum sambac Oleaceae Shrub
Belladonna Lily Amaryllis belladonna Amaryllidaceae Herb
Bleeding Heart Clerodendrum thomsonae Verbenaceae Climber
Bokul (Indian Medlar) Mimusops elengi Sapotaceae Tree
Bot (Bengal Fig) Ficus benghalensis Moraceae Shurb
Botamphul/Buttonhole Gomphrena globosa Onagraceae Herb
Flower
Bottle Brush Callistemon lanceolatus Myrtaceae Tree
Bougainvillea Bougainvillea sp Nyctaginaceae Climber
Brake fern Pteris vittata Polypodiaceae Herb
Brunfelsia Brunfelsia americana Solanaceae Climber
Cactus Cactus sp Cactaceae Herb
Campsis Campsis grandiflora Bignoniaceae Climber
Casablanca Lilium auratum Liliaceae Shrub
Cassia Cassia glauca Caesalpiniaceae Shrub
Champa Michelia champaca Magnoliaceae Tree
Chita (Zigzag Plant) Pedilanthus sp Euphorbiaceae Herb
Chrysanthemum Chrysanthemum segetum Compositae Herb
Coleus Coleus sp Labiatae Herb
Cosmos Cosmos sp Compositae Herb
Croton Codiaeum craigii Euphorbiaceae Shurb
Cycus Cycus sp Cycadaceae Shurb
Dahlia Dahlia sp Compositae Herb
Debdaru Polyalthia longifolia Annonaceae Tree
Dianthus Dianthus sp Caryophyllaceae Herb
Dilbahar Hamelia patens Rubiaceae Shrub
Dolonchapa (Ginger Lily) Hedychium coronarium Amaryllidaceae Herb
Dopati (Balsam) Impatiens balsamina Balsaminaceae Herb
Dracaena Dracaena sp Liliaceae Herb
Dupurmoni (Noon Flower) Pentapetes phoenicia Scrophulariaceae Herb
Duranta Duranta sp Verbenaceae Shurb
Football Lily Haemanthus multiflorus Amaryllidaceae Herb
Gate Phul (Cypress Vine) Quamoclit pinnata Convolvulaceae Climber
http://www.ijbssr.com
Flora of SAU 71
http://www.ijbssr.com
Islam et al. 72
http://www.ijbssr.com
Flora of SAU 73
http://www.ijbssr.com