Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2
2.0 Training and Development...................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Theoretical Underpinning of Training and Development ................................................................... 3
2.1.1 Abraham Maslows Hierarchy of Needs Theory .......................................................................... 4
2.1.2 Herzberg s Two-Factor Theory .................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Impact of Employee Training and Development on Employee Performance .................................... 5
2.3 Relationship between Training and Organization Performance......................................................... 6
2.4 Training and Development Case Study ............................................................................................... 6
2.5 discussion ............................................................................................................................................ 7
3.0 Reward Management ............................................................................................................................. 7
3.1 Theoretical Underpinning of Reward Management ........................................................................... 8
3.1.1 Agency Theory.............................................................................................................................. 8
3.2 Intrinsic Reward Management and Organization Performance ......................................................... 9
3.3 Extrinsic Reward Management and Organization Performance ...................................................... 10
3.4 Reward Management Case Study ..................................................................................................... 10
3.5 Discussion.......................................................................................................................................... 11
4.0 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 11
5.0 References ............................................................................................................................................ 12
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: P.V Morgans Dimensions of IHRM ................................................................................................ 2
Figure 2: Maslows Hierarchy of Needs ........................................................................................................ 4
Figure 3: Hertzbergs Two-Factory Theory.................................................................................................... 5
Figure 4: Agency Theory Framework ............................................................................................................ 8
1.0 INTRODUCTION
To start with, the most essential elements that influence the operational performance of the
associations is the human resources (Sendogdu, Kocabacak and Guven, 2013). Consequently, the
improvement or development of organizational commitment needs powerful human resource
management practices. Human Resource Management, as a key player in the creation and
advancement of a profoundly productive workforce, lies in the focal point of the debate on the
competitiveness of companies (Lepak, 2006). Practices that advance and promote worker
motivation and exertion, knowledge, aptitudes and capacities, and opportunities for employees
contribution (Jiang, Lepak, Hu, Baer 2012) produce good conditions for the improvement of
resources and capabilities that create value for associations, adding to their performance as well as
to the development of sustained competitive advantages (Brito and Oliveira, 2016).
This paper presents a theoretical analysis of the relationship between Human Resource
Management (HRM) and organization performance. Theoretically, this paper discusses Training
and Development (TD) and Reward Management (RM) as two (2) strategic functions of Human
Resource Management and its impact on business performance. The first section of the report
focuses on Training and Development and its effect on employee performance and organizational
performance, while the second section of the paper focuses on reward management and the
influence it is has towards organizational performance. Relevant theories as well as case studies
will be utilized for both functions of HRM to support the discussion. The paper will end with a
summary of findings in context with the theme of this paper.
As it is realized that training and development alludes to the procedure to acquire or exchange
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities (KSA) expected to do a particular activity or task: consequently,
benefits of training and development both for manager and employees are vital in nature and
subsequently much extensive. Knowledge and skills required by an association can be given to
learners through training (Fitzgerald, 1992) in light of the fact that not all employees will come to
the job with complete knowledge and experience essential for performing regulated assignments.
In this way, most associations consider the development of human resources as imperative
investment exertion towards the development of the performance of the association (Hau and
Omar, 2015).
Hygiene factors are the environmentally related components related with negative feelings.
Conversely, motivation factors empower exertion: notwithstanding an absence of these will not
increase satisfaction as will the hygiene factors, rather, it will prompt
disappointment/dissatisfaction (Ghazi, Shahzada and Khan, 2013). In this manner, the
fundamental premises of the two-factor theory are that if an employer tries to build job satisfaction
inferred on the job alongside with job performance for employee or the co-workers, then the need
to give careful consideration to those components that influence ones job satisfaction is vital (Tan
and Waheed, 2011).
supposed to build up a system that guarantees steady learning, and a compelling method of doing
as such is through employee training.
Olubukunola (2015) states that a well prepared and trained workforce tends to be more capable to
record performance targets and furthermore, gain high competitive advantages within the market.
The employee performance that is accomplished through training alludes to ceaseless
enhancements in knowledge, skills and capacities to do obligations identified with work, and thus
accomplish more employee commitment towards the companys goals.
Training has a positive association with internal organizational performance (Ahmad and
Schroeder, 2003). In particular, these reviews uncovered that training practices impact business
performance outcome and quality performance results. A complete training design structure is fit
for enhancing productivity and empowering better product performance and quality (Guerrero and
Barraud, 2004). In addition, a study conducted by Laplagne and Bensted (1999) gave an account
of the effect of training and innovation on the performance of workplaces in Australia. The
connection between training and internal organizational performance is likewise upheld by other
research works in different settings. For instance, in accordance to Hau and Omar (2015), training
can have a constructive outcome on product innovation and product quality.
The electric business unit of a noteworthy Midwestern utility organization confronted the
challenge of preparing workers for a more focused and competitive deregulated market (Callahan,
1997). The company initiated a few projects for enhancing inward processes, including customer
service. One of the customer service initiative included combing job roles: customer service
employee would have more extensive duties as opposed of being specialists in one area. The
training department has to rapidly design and develop financially effective training for more than
200 workers in marketing and technical training so they could end up competent in their new roles
in a short amount of time. The outcomes of this included enhanced competence and certainty
among staff as well as better customer service and satisfaction (Callahan, 1997). Staff productivity
additionally ascended because of less requirement for classroom training and more dependence on
job aids and performance support. Staff reported more prominent job satisfaction with extensive
occupation obligations.
2.5 DISCUSSION
It is exceptionally essential for an association to design the training carefully. The design of the
training ought to accord to the necessities of the employees. Those associations which build up a
decent training design as per the need of employees and additionally to the association dependably
obtain good results. It appears that training assumes an extremely imperative role in the employee
as well as organizational performance. An awful training design is only a loss of time and money
(Khan, 2011). Training assists employee to obtain the knowledge of their job in a better way.
Individuals gain more from their viable experience much better as contrast with erudite knowledge.
There is rising requirement for association to create reward systems that motivate employee to
work harder and quicker. Proficient reward frameworks channel employees endeavors towards
acknowledgment of its goal (Musenze, 2013). Reward management has been characterized by
Musenze (2013) to include formulation and implementation of strategies and policies that aim to
reward individuals reasonably, impartially and in a consistent manner, which ought to be in
accordance with organizational values in order to allow the association to realize its strategic goal.
Reward systems consist of compensation (pay and bonuses), benefits, learning and development
and the work environment around employees.
Work environment motivators comprise of money related and non-fiscal impetuses (Armstrong,
2006). Monetary incentives require remunerating employees for their excellent job performance
though money. These motivators incorporate benefit sharing, project bonuses, schedule bonuses,
additional paid vacation time and many others. These have helped to maintain a positive
motivational environment for employee, significant for enhanced organization performance. Non-
monetary reward incentives, then again, depict a remunerating framework for employee aimed at
generating excellent job performances though opportunities such as flexible work hours, training
opportunities, pleasant work environment and vacation leaves (Yasmeen, Farooq and Asghar,
2013).
The fundamental idea was that the change of the connection between ownership and leading the
company prompts a circumstance with principle (the owner) and an agent (the executives) (Fauzi
and Locke, 2012). In executive compensation literature, the agency theory is frequently utilized as
a result of the fact that from an agencys perspective, the executive compensation can be viewed
as an agreement between the agent and the principal (shareholder). This is done in order to align
the interest of the shareholder (principal) with the interest of the executive director (agent) and can
be viewed as a support for the compensation paid to the executive director (Kunz, 2002).
By having the high levels of intrinsic rewards, employees become the informal recruiters and
marketers for their organization in which they recommend their friends to work in the organization
and recommend product and services to potential customers. As per Kikoito (2014) , intrinsic
rewards create a win-win circumstance for associations and its employees. The employees feel
happy and satisfies as they experience feelings of accomplishment and self-esteem, which create
job fulfilment/satisfaction, and this translates into improved work performance. In the meantime,
the association increases its sales volume and profit. Besides, intrinsic rewards encourage greater
levels of satisfaction and competency. As a result, employees have more intrigue, excitement and
confidence in performing tasks which leads to enhanced organization performance.
While experimental research has demonstrated that extrinsic rewards assist in enhancing individual
creative performance which contribute ultimately towards organization performance. In any case,
the effect of extrinsic rewards on group adequacy or job performance is indistinct and the models
provide little direction with respect to particular types of rewards that maximize particular
outcomes in work group. Nonetheless, Kikoito (2014), found that reward
measurements/dimensions have noteworthy impacts on employees performance. Specifically,
they found that compensation, performance bonus, recognition and praise are the tools that
management can use to motivate staff in order for them to perform effectively and efficiently.
4.0 CONCLUSION
This paper served the purpose of providing cognizance with respect to the effects that specific key
elements/functions of Human Resource Management have towards enhancing organizational
performance. Among these specific elements of Human Resource Management, one might say that
Training and Development positively influences organization performance in several aspects such
a customer satisfaction. Furthermore, Reward Management has found to have a positive
relationship towards organizational performance in terms of sales performance and creativity,
however, it has become critically important for associations to evaluate and related these rewards
(both intrinsic and extrinsic) towards the needs of employees. Another might say that,
organizational performance is heavily dependent on the satisfaction level of its employees, this
paper demonstrates that satisfaction is improved given the appropriate reward system and training
and development opportunities.
5.0 REFERENCES
Abbasi, S. and Hollman, K. (2000). Turnover: The Real Bottom Line. Public Personnel
Management, 29(3), pp.333-342.
Ahmad, S. and Schroeder, R. (2003). The impact of human resource management practices on
operational performance: recognizing country and industry differences. Journal of Operations
Management, 21(1), pp.19-43.
Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management. 10th ed. London: Kogan
Page Limited.
Brito, R. and Oliveira, L. (2017). The Relationship Between Human Resource Management and
Organizational Performance. [online] Brazilian Business Review. Available at:
http://www.bbronline.com.br/public/edicoes/13_3/artigos/63c92v6e1@1182016144510.pdf
[Accessed 2 Apr. 2017].
Callahan, M. (1997). From training to performance consulting. 1st ed. Alexandria, Va.:
American Society for Training and Development.
Dawson, B. (2012). ROI Case Study: Incentive Success for Key Distributors | Research | The
Incentive Research Foundation. [online] Theirf.org. Available at: http://theirf.org/research/roi-
case-study-incentive-success-for-key-distributors/196/#3 [Accessed 3 Apr. 2017].
Fitzgerald, W. (1992). Training versus development. Training and Development, 46(5), pp.81-
84.
Ghazi, S., Shahzada, G. and Khan, S. (2013). Resurrecting Herzbergs Two Factor Theory: An
Implication to the University Teachers. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(2),
pp.445-450.
Jiang, K., Lepak, D., Hu, J. and Baer, J. (2012). How Does Human Resource Management
Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Mediating
Mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), pp.1264-1294.
Kunz, A. and Pfaff, D. (2002). Agency theory, performance evaluation, and the hypothetical
construct of intrinsic motivation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(3), pp.275-295.
Laplagne, P. and Bensted, L. (1999). The Role of Training and Innovation in Workplace
Performance. 1st ed. Melbourne: Australian Productivity Commission Staff Research Paper.
Lepak, D., Liao, H., Chung, Y. and Harden, E. (2006). A Conceptual Review of Human
Resource Management Systems in Strategic Human Resource Management Research. Research
in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 25(1), pp.217 - 271.
Ong, T. and Teh, B. (2012). Reward System and Performance Within Malaysian Manufacturing
Companies. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(7), pp.1009-1017.
Rudman, R. (2010). Human resources management in New Zealand. 1st ed. Auckland, N.Z.:
Longman Paul.
Tan, T. and Waheed, A. (2011). Herzbergs motivation-hygiene theory and job satisfaction in the
malaysian retail sector: the mediating effect of love of money. Asian Academy of Management
Journal, 16(1), pp.7394.
Tremblay, M., Cote, J. and Balkin, D. (2003). Explaining Sales Pay Strategy Using Agency,
Transaction Cost and Resource Dependence Theories*. Journal of Management Studies, 40(7),
pp.1651-1682.
endodu, A., Kocabacak, A. and Gven, . (2013). The Relationship between Human Resource
Management Practices and Organizational Commitment: A Field Study. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 99, pp.818-827.