Produced by: Agriculture and Consumer Prote

Title: Project on Livestock Industrialization, Trade and Social-Health-Environment ...

VIII. Conclusions

At the beginning of this report, five key questions were posed concerning the poultry industry in India.
The analysis throughout this report reveals the following:

Profitability defined as profits (excluding family labour wages) per unit of output does not differ
significantly between small-size and large-size farms, whether layer or broiler. In other words,
profitability per unit is not significantly affected by scale of operations.

The main factors that determine profitability are the price of chicks (DOCs), price of labour (wage
rate), price of feed, price of eggs/broilers, and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR). Profitability is inversely
related to the price of chicks, wage rate, price of feed, and FCR, and is positively related to the price
of eggs/broilers. (The FCR and wage rate are significant only for broilers).

Though profitability per unit does not differ significantly between small farms and large farms, the
efficiency of these two types of farms does differ significantly. Small farms are relatively inefficient,
and the principal reasons for their inefficiency are high transaction costs and pollution abatement
costs associated with policy induced distortion. This is specially true for layer farms. To be more
precise, small producers enjoy fewer advantages compared with large producers in terms of
obtaining information, marketing, and transportation and storage facilities (transaction costs). At the
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
 same time, small producers are observed to spend more effort per unit of poultry output than large
producers on collecting, drying and transporting poultry manure (pollution abatement costs).
Speculatively, this could be due to the lower opportunity cost of their own labor, or perhaps to the
greater incentive to keep the surrounding household and neighborhood environment clean in a close-
settled smallholder setting.

In addition to transaction costs and pollution abatement costs, differences in the amount of implicit
policy subsidies received by farms across regions/states are also found to affect the relative profit
efficiency of small and large producers. Large farms in Andhra Pradesh, for example, are more profit
inefficient than their smaller counterparts in the state of Haryana, because Andhra Pradesh levies a
four percent processing tax on poultry products in addition to the usual sales tax on poultry feed,
while Haryana levies no such taxes.

A significant difference exists in the profitability of contract farms vis--vis independent farms. The
profitability of contract farms in this study, whether large or small, is generally lower than that of
independent farms.

These study results do provide valuable inputs to policymaking. Approximately 15 million people in
India are currently making a livelihood from poultry farming, and many of them are small producers.
These small farmers are severely constrained by the cost of inputs/outputs, a lack of adequate
infrastructure, poor transport facilities, an inefficient marketing system, and no proper means of
disseminating information. In order to strengthen these 15 million farmers and make them more
competitive, the following policies may be recommended.

First, it must be noted that the poultry industry is highly dependent on the feed industry feed alone
constitutes 65 percent of the cost of broiler and egg production. Therefore, any price movement in
the feed sector will have a direct positive effect on the prices of eggs and broilers. The main feed
ingredients used are maize, soya, rice bran, and other cereals. Of these, maize is the most critical
one in India. Domestic production of maize has remained almost static at around 10 million tonnes
per annum for the last decade or so. The poultry industry alone requires about five million tonnes per
annum.

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
 Other users of maize in India include the starch industry, the cattle feed industry, the seed sector,
and the general population. Severe shortages of maize have frequently existed, causing the price to
shoot up and leading to crisis and turmoil in the poultry industry. Imports of maize were at one time
restricted, but, since April 2000, imports have been approved under Open General License (OGL).
There is, however, a 15 percent duty levied on imports of up to 450,000 tonnes, and it has been
proposed that that duty increase by 50 percent (Tariff Rate Quota or TRQ) on quantities greater than
450,000 tonnes.

According to estimates prepared by the Poultry Federation of India, the proposed hike in the import
duty on maize could increase poultry feed costs by as much as one rupee per kg. It seems likely that
such a hike will hurt independent farmers more than contactors and small farmers more than large
ones, other things equal. Larger and more vertically-integrated enterprises have greater flexibility and
more resources than small independents to adjust to price rises in a single key input. Providing all
producers, but especially smaller ones, with feed at a competitive price might require that (a) the
present TRQ be raised or abolished, and (b) domestic production of maize be increased by
increasing the yield per hectare, which is currently the lowest in the world at 1.4 tonnes (as
compared with a world average of 4.2 tonnes). In order to increase domestic production of maize,
though, India may have to diversify its agricultural production through contract farming and/or
cultivation of GMO seed varieties.

Second, serious efforts are warranted from the government of India to improve basic infrastructure
facilities (stoppage and transportation, including cold chain), access to credit, dissemination of
information, and the marketing system, all of which have severely constrained small farmers and
much more so than large farmers. For example, in the case of the marketing system, poultry
products currently pass through various intermediaries before they reach the final consumer. The
presence of so many intermediaries between the producers and the consumer harms the interests
of both the producer does not get a remunerative price for his product and the consumer pays a high
price because of the cascading profit margins from so many intermediaries. In order to address this,
the marketing system should also grow along professional lines that may include the use of the
traditional channels of traders to some extent in the intervening period before the marketing system is
substantially improved.

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
 Third, the government should endeavour to create a favourable economic environment for increasing
capital formation and investment in poultry by rationalising the tax structure and removing distortions
in incentives. Several Indian states levy taxes on poultry processing and feed manufacturing, which
tends to increase production costs and retard industry growth.

Finally, the Indian poultry sector, classified neither as an agricultural sector nor an industrial sector,
receives far less support than its potential contribution might indicate. While the poultry growers
continue to pay the same rate of income tax as any other industry, they receive neither subsidised
power nor water, unlike the agricultural sector. Poultry producers also do not receive other fiscal and
regulatory benefits and concessions available to the industrial sector. This ambiguity in the status of
poultry producers is currently hindering the potential of this important sector. Improved governmental
policy would treat all small poultry producers as agriculturists, extending the same benefits and
concessions to them as to other agriculturists.

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com