Você está na página 1de 6

PROVINCE: _____________________________________

MUNICIPALITY: _____________________________________
PROJECT NAME: ______________________________________________________

SUBMITTED REMARKS /
DESCRIPTION
YES NO N/A COMMENTS
1. FIELD INVESTIGATION
1.1 Location Map
1.1.1 Geographic Location
1.1.1.1 Beginning of Project
(BOP)
1.1.1.2 End of Project (EOP)
1.2 General Notes
1.3 Typical Section
1.4 Plan
1.4.1 Road Centerline (actual
alignment)
1.4.1.1 Existing Road Centerline
1.4.1.2 Proposed Centerline
1.4.2 Horizontal & Vertical Control
1.4.2.1 BMs @500 Interval
Max.
1.4.2.2 Location reference
points1.4.2.2.1 Northing &
Easting
1.4.2.2.2 Description
1.4.2.2.3 Elevation
1.4.3 Horizontal Curve Data
1.4.3.1 External Angle = I
1.4.3.2 Horizontal Radius = R
1.4.3.3 Tangent Length = T
1.4.3.4 Curve Length = LC
1.4.3.5 External Distance = E
1.4.3.6 Design Speed = V
1.4.3.7 Point of Curvature = PC
1.4.3.8 Point of Horizontal
Intersection = PI
1.4.3.9 Point of Tangency = PT
1.4.4 Existing & Proposed Structure
1.4.4.1 Inlet/Outlet
1.4.5 Informative Sign Location
1.4.6 Driveway Entrance
1.5 Profile
1.5.1 Existing Centerline
1.5.2 Finish Grade
1.5.3 Point of Vertical Intersection
(PVI) Station
1.5.4 Elevation
1.5.5 Vertical Curve Data
1.5.5.1 Vertical Curve Length
1.5.5.2 PVI Station
1.5.5.3 PVI Elevation
1.5.5.4 Point of Vertical
Curvature (PVC)
SUBMITTED REMARKS /
DESCRIPTION
YES NO N/A COMMENTS
1.5.5.5 Point of Vertical
Tangency (PVT)
1.5.5.6 Rate of vertical Curvature
=K
1.5.5.7 Middle Ordinate = MO
1.5.6 Existing and Proposed Structure
1.5.6.1 Elevation
1.5.6.2 Dimension
1.6 Cross Section
1.6.1 Cross Section @20m. Interval
1.6.2 Existing Structure
1.6.3 Summary of Quantities
1.6.4 Elevation and Extent from
Centerline
1.6.5 Finish Grade Elevation
1.6.6 Existing Grade Elevation
1.6.7 Slope of Traveled Way (TW)
1.6.8 Slope of Shoulders
2. HIGHWAY DESIGN
2.1 Check the control points that were used in this road
section.
2.2 Check the values of cross slope, shoulder slope, and
dimension.
2.3 Check the minimum radius used corresponding to
design speed for the horizontal alignment
2.4 Check the required K value based on the design
speed used for the vertical alignment
2.5 Check for the minimum & maximum grades if it
have complied with the Design Guidelines
2.6 Check for the finished grade elevations if there is
minimum covering for pipe culverts, clearance for the
bridge, maximum flood levels should be considered.
2.7 Include in your table of elements of curve the
superelevation value, widening value, and design speed.
2.8 Review the cross slope values on the travelled way
& shoulders
2.9 Requirements to provide guardrails/grouted riprap,
coconet slope protection: On ravine side, and when the
height of embankment is more than 3.0m.
3. HYDROLOGY AND DRAINAGE
3.1 Drainage System Plans
3.1.1 Cross Drainage Structures
3.1.1.1 RCPC
3.1.1.2 RCBC
3.1.1.3 Lateral Drains
3.1.2 Longitudinal Drains
3.1.3 Underdrains, if any
3.2 Profiles
SUBMITTED REMARKS /
DESCRIPTION
YES NO N/A COMMENTS
3.2.1 Flowlines
3.3 Drainage Cross-Sections
3.4 Special Drawings/Details for Special Design
3.5 Standard Details
3.5.1 RCPC
3.5.2 RCBC
3.5.3 Ditches
3.5.3.1 Lined Ditches
3.5.3.2 Earth Ditches
3.5.3.3 Types
3.5.4 Headwalls
3.5.5 Etc.
3.6 Schedule of Culverts
3.7 Schedule of Ditches
3.8 Drainage Design Report
3.8.1 Calculations
3.8.1.1 Design Discharge
3.8.1.2 Sizes
3.8.1.3 Velocities
3.8.1.4 RIDF
3.8.1.5 Etc.
3.8.2 Delineation of drainage areas
3.8.3 Discussion on the
methodologies and results
4. PAVEMENT DESIGN
4.1 Design Requirements
4.1.1 Design Life
4.1.2 Traffic Data
4.1.3 Reliability
4.1.4 Serviceability
4.1.5 Material Properties for Design
4.1.6 Pavement Structural Characteristics
4.1.7 Pavement Design
4.2 Material Testing Requirement of Subbase, Base, Surface Course
4.2.1 California Bearing Ratio(CBR)
4.2.2 Abrasion
4.2.3 Moisture Density Relation Test
4.2.4 Natural Moisture Content
4.2.5 Grading Analysis
4.2.6 Atterberg Limits( LL/PL/PI)
4.2.7 Specific Gravity
4.2.8 Clay Lumps
4.2.9 Flakiness Index
4.2.10 Soundness Test
4.2.11 Unit Weight Test
SUBMITTED REMARKS /
DESCRIPTION
YES NO N/A COMMENTS
4.3 Materials Map
5. GEOTECHNICAL
5.1 Foundation Investigation/Laboratory Test Data
5.2 Design Soil Parameters
5.3 Road Cut and Embankment Slope Protection
5.3.1 refer to DPWH D.O 68
5.3.2 Details e.g. Weep holes,
granular fill
5.4 Fill Behind Wall (granular materials)
5.5 Slope Protection Works (Stone Masonry vs
Concrete Retaining Wall)
5.6 Embankment Stability Analysis
6. QUANTITY AND COST ESTIMATE
6.1 Quantity Calculations
6.2 Unit Price Analysis (including loading cycle
analysis)
6.2.1 Distance of Material
Source/Quarry from Project Site
6.2.2 Unit Prices of Commercial
Materials
6.2.3 Unit Prices of Processed
Materials
6.2.4 Labor & Equipment Rates
6.3 Project Schedule & S-Curve
6.3.1 Straight Line Diagram
6.4 PERT-CPM
6.5 List of Minimum Manpower and Equipment Crew
6.6 List of Minimum Equipment Requirement
7. DRAWINGS
7.1 General
7.1.1 Table of Contents
7.1.2 Lay-Out Plan, Location Map
and Key Map
7.1.3 Legends, Abbreviations and
Symbols
7.1.4 General Notes (road, drainage
and structure)
7.1.5 Material Source Map
7.2 Roadway
7.2.1 Typical Roadway Sections
7.2.2 Plan and Profile
7.2.3 Schedule of Guardrails, Slope
Protection and Road Signs
7.2.4 Cross Sections
7.3 Road Standards And Details
7.4 Drainage Standard and Details
7.5 Drainage Schedule and Cross Sections
7.5.1 Drainage and Line Canal
Schedule
7.5.2 Drainage Cross Sections
7.6 Miscellaneous
7.6.1 Project Information Sign Detail
8. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION DOCUMENTATION
SUBMITTED REMARKS /
DESCRIPTION
YES NO N/A COMMENTS

EVALUATED BY:

________________________
NAME
POSITION

CHECKED BY:

____________________________
NAME
POSITION

Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG - NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA Corner Quezon Avenue, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph


CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENT FOR THE REVIEW

DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN


(FOR ROAD PROJECTS)

PROGRAM:
FY:
PROVINCE:
MUNICIPALITY:

COST
ROAD NET MODE OF GENERAL COMMENTS TOTAL LGU PROJECT FROM
PROJECT WORK
NAME / LENGTH IMPLEMEN DIRECT COST INDIRECT COST PROJECT COUNTERPART NG RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER CATEGORY
SECTION (Km) TATION MATERIALS EQUIPMENT LABOR OCM TAX PROFIT EAO COST IN CASH IN KIND SUBSID
Y

NOTED BY:

NAME
POSITION

Você também pode gostar