Design of 3storey Public School Building With Rainwater Harvesting System in Maybunga Pasig PDF

Design of T hree Storey Public School Building
with Rainwater Harvesting System
in Maybunga, Pasig City
Project by
Abanador, Neilson B.
Regorosa, Christian F.
San Pedro, Robin S.
Submitted to the School of Civil, Environmental and Geological

Engineering (SCEGE)
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
For the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
(Degree Program)
Mapua Institute of T echnology
Manila City
September/2012
ii
iii
Executive Summary
With this project, we were given the opportunity to help the institution of Rizal
Experimental Station and Pilot School of Cottage Industries and the Local government of
Pasig City. We designed a 3-storey school building that will provide classrooms and
school facility to the students and the faculty members as well. The design of the building
includes rainwater harvesting system which will collect rain water and will be reused for
external application like cleaning, irrigation to garden, flushing of toilets and as
sprinklers in case of fire. This project will bridge the gap between the classroom shortage
and the growing population of students as to improve the quality of education in the
Philippines.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: Introduction ...............................................................................................1

1.1 Problem Statement..................................................................................................3
1.2 Project Objective ....................................................................................................3
1.3 Design Norms Considered......................................................................................3
1.4 Major and Minor Areas of Civil Engineering ........................................................4
1.5 The Project Beneficiary ..........................................................................................4
1.6 The Innovative Approach .......................................................................................4
1.7 The Research Component.......................................................................................5
1.8 The Design Component ..........................................................................................5
1.9 Sustainable Development Concept .........................................................................6
CHAPTER 2: Environmental Examination Report ......................................................7
2.1 Project Description ...............................................................................................7
2.1.1 Project Rationale ..........................................................................................7
2.1.2 Project Location ............................................................................................7
2.1.3 Project Information .......................................................................................9
2.1.4 Description of Project Phases .......................................................................9
2.1.5 Pre-construction/Operational phase...............................................................9
2.1.6 Construction phase ......................................................................................10
2.1.7 Operational phase ........................................................................................11
2.1.8 Abandonment phase ....................................................................................11
2.2 Description of Environmental Setting and Receiving Environme nt .............11
2.2.1 Physical Environment..................................................................................11
2.2.2 Biological Environment ..............................................................................12
2.2.3 Socio-Cultural, Economic and Political Environment ................................12
2.2.4 Future Environmental Conditions without the Project ...............................13
2.3 Impact Assessment and Mitigation ...................................................................14
2.3.1 Summary Matrix of Predicted Environmental Issues/Impacts and their
Level of Significance at Various Stages of Development ...........................14
v
2.3.2 Brief Discussion of Specific Significant Impacts on the Physical and

Biological Resources ...................................................................................15
2.3.3 Brief Discussion of Significant Socio-economic Effects/Impacts of the
Project .........................................................................................................16
2.4 Environmental Manage ment Plan ....................................................................17
2.4.1 Summary Matrix of Proposed Mitigation and Enhancement Measures,
Estimated Cost and Responsibilities ...........................................................17
2.4.2 Brief Discussion of Mitigation and Enhancement Measures .....................18
2.4.3 Monitoring Plan ..........................................................................................18
2.4.4 Contingency Plan ........................................................................................19
2.4.5 Institutional Responsibilities and Agreements ...........................................19
CHAPTER 3: The Research Component .....................................................................20

3.1 Abstract.................................................................................................................20
3.2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................20
3.3 Review of Related Literature................................................................................21
3.4 Methodology.........................................................................................................23
3.5 Results and Discussion .........................................................................................25
3.6 Conclusion ............................................................................................................26
CHAPTER 4: Detailed Engineering Design .................................................................27
4.1 Plan Set ................................................................................................................27
4.1.1 Architectural Plans..27
4.1.1.1 Perspective.........................................................................................27
4.1.1.2 Floor Plans ........................................................................................28
4.1.1.3 Elevation Plans .................................................................................30
4.1.2 Structural Plans ...........................................................................................33
4.2 Design of Supe rstructure ...................................................................................36
4.2.1 Design of Roof Truss ......36
4.2.2 Design of Beams .........................................................................................39
4.2.3 Design of Columns .....................................................................................42
4.2.4 Design of Slabs ...........................................................................................44
4.3 Design of Substructure .......................................................................................45
vi
4.3.1 Soil Investigation.45

4.3.2 Design of Foundation...45
4.4 Rainwater Harvesting System ...................................................................47
CHAPTER 5: Budget Estimation ..................................................................................48
CHAPTER 6: Project's Schedule ..................................................................................54
6.1 Manpower Requirement....54
6.2 Equipment Requirement...55
6.3 Gauntt Chart..........56
CHAPTER 7: Promotional Material ............................................................................58
CHAPTER 8: Conclusion and Summary .....................................................................61
CHAPTER 9: Recommendation.....................................................................................63
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...........................................................................................64
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................65
APPENDICES .................................................................................................................66
A. Structural Computations
B. Article Type Paper
C. Original Project Report Assessment Sheet by Panel Members
D. English Editor Assessment and Evaluation Rubic
E. Accomplished Consultation Forms
F. Compilation of Assessment Forms (Rubrics)
G. Copy of Engineering Drawings and Plans
H. Copy of Project Poster
I. Photocopy of Receipts
J. Relevant Pictures
K. Other Required Forms
L. Student Reflections
M. Resume of Each Member
vii
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
Table 1: DepEd report on Budget, Shortages, Target and Deficit (2010) 2
Table 2: Summary Matrix of Predicted Environmental Issues/Impacts and
their Level of Significance at Various Stages of Development 14
Table 3: Summary Matrix of Proposed Mitigation and Enhancement
Measures, Estimated Cost and Responsibilities 17
Table 4: Monitoring Plan 18
Table 5: Properties of Channel Section (C 3x5) for Purlins 37
Table 6: Schedule of Beams 39
Table 7; Schedule of Columns 42
Table 8: Schedule of Slabs 44
Table 9: Concrete Works For Beams 49
Table 10: Summary For Beams 49
Table 11: Concrete Works For Columns 49
Table 11.1: Columns At Ground 49
Table 11.2: At 2FLR 49
Table 11.3: At 3FLR 50
Table 11.4: Summary For Columns 50
Table 12: Concrete Works For Slabs 50
Table 13: Reinforcements For Beams 50
Table 13.1: Beam Reinforcements Per Level 50
Table 14: Reinforcement For Columns 51
Table 15: Reinforcement For Slabs 51

viii
Table 16: Summary Of Cost 52
Table 17: Cost - Benefit Analysis 53
Table 18: Detailed Estimated Duration of Each Work Classification
for the Project 54
Table 19: Manpower Requirement 54
Table 20 Equipment Requirement 55
Table 21: Project Schedule 56
Figure 1: This show the exact location of site in satellite view 8
Figure 2: This show the exact location of site and nearby streets 8
Figure 3: Methodology Flow Chart 24
Figure 4: Perspective View 27
Figure 5: Ground & 3rd Floor Plan 28
Figure 6: 2nd Floor Plan 29
Figure 7: Front Elevation 30
Figure 8: Rear Elevation 31
Figure 9: Right Side Elevation 32
Figure 10: Left Side Elevation 32
Figure 11: Typical Framing Plan 33
Figure 12: Roof Framing Plan 34
Figure 13: Truss Details 35
Figure 14: Design of Sagrod and Tierod 37
Figure 15: Truss Top Chords 38
Figure 16: Truss Bottom Chords 38

ix
Figure 17: Truss Web Members 38
Figure 18: Typical Beam Details 41
Figure 19: Typical Column Details 43
Figure 20: Typical Beam-Column Framing Plan 44
Figure 21: Elevation of Mat Foundation 45
Figure 22: Foundation Plan 46
Figure 23: Lumion Software 58
Figure 24: Walkthrough - Front 58
Figure 25: Walkthrough- Top 59
Figure 26: Walkthrough- Corridor 59
Figure 27: Walkthrough- Classroom A 59
Figure 28: Walkthrough- Classroom B 60
Figure 29: Walkthrough- Mens CR 60
Figure 30: Walkthrough- Womens CR 60

1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
According to the human capital theory, the economic development of a nation is a

function of the quality of its education. In other words: the more and better educated the
people, the greater the chances of economic development. The modern world in which
we live is often termed, knowledge society where education and information have
become production factors potentially more valuable than labor and capital. Thus, in
globalized setting, investment in human capital has become a condition for international
competitiveness.
The state of educational system in the Philippines is facing a lot of challenges

today. In the past, the students that were produced were well-rounded and ready to face
the challenges of the real world. Today, for every 10 children who start their primary
education, only 6 go to secondary and only 4 will manage to enter college. Issues
regarding the education in the Philippines have been looked upon and these include:
quality of education, affordability of education, budget for education and education
mismatch. The quality of education has continuously declined in the primary and
secondary levels as the results of standard tests among these levels and the National
College Entrance Exam for the college level. The results were way below the target mean
score. Moreover, there is also a big disparity in educational achievements across social
groups. Students, who belong to poor families, often drop out of school as early as
elementary because they cannot afford the cost of education. There is an education
mismatch between what the student learns in the academe and in the real world. This
applies to college students who graduated under skilled and the cause of having
unemployed and underemployed graduates.
The budget for education, as the constitution mandates, must have the highest
allocation of the government budget. However, this is not being followed as the
education sector has been one of the lowest allocations for education in the ASEAN
countries. As a matter of fact, the budget for this school year was cut short by the current
administration to solve the debt of the country. Thus, the education sector is now facing a
shortage of facility, particularly classrooms, to accommodate the growing population of
the country.
According the Aceron, J., Director of the Government Watch Program of the
Ateneo School of Government, the Department of Education reported that it faces a total
of 152, 569 shortage in classrooms this 2011, if the ideal classroom-student ratio of 1:45
in a single shift. From 2002-2009, the number of schools in the country that is
2
experiencing shortage has hardly changed and in some time, it increased like from 10,326
(23%) in 2006 up to 11,992 (27%) in 2010. On the other hand, 2 billion pesos was
allotted for the education budget for the year 2002-2005, 2007 2009 and 1.76 billion
pesos in 2006. The average number of project covered by this budget per year is 3,149
Regular School Building Program Project from 2002-2009. This had been insufficient to
address the shortage of classrooms during these years, which averages at 10,576 schools
per year. It would need about 91 billion peso budget allocation for school building project
in order to address the shortage of classrooms for 2011; However, the current budget of
10 billion pesos will only respond to 11% of the total need.
Table 1: DepEd report on Budget, Shortages, Target and Deficit (2010)
As of September 2011, Senator Edgardo Angara has urged the Department of

Education to immediately address the lack of classrooms and other shortages in physical
infrastructures during the budget hearing at the Senate. DepEd has built 13,144
classrooms and plans to reduce the gap to 34, 349 out of 66,000 classrooms by the end of
the year. Angara urged the department to work fast so that teachers can focus more on
teaching their students rather than worrying about the facilities that they are using.
In line with these problems, the group aims to help address the problem of school
facility shortage by providing a school building to be used by the public school students
in secondary and tertiary level. The construction of this building will bring students an
access to basic education, further nurture their talents and pursue their dreams despite
their socio-economic status. This will also bring a step forward in bridging the gap
between the classroom demand and the growth of the population to improve the quality
of education in the Philippines.
3
1.1 Problem Statement
This project addresses the problems faced by students and faculty members in
public schools. Public school is meant to be an affordable way for all children to get a
sufficient and useful education. But since it is free, the lack of funding results to the
dismal state of classrooms and facilities of public schools in the country. The shortage of
classrooms is the leading dilemma of these public schools. The average public high
school class has about sixty students, whereas the average private high school class has
about thirty students per classroom. It is much harder for students to get help and
individual attention when there are more students in a class. Public schools must also
provide safety and security for the students and a comfortable environment for their
extra- curricular activities.
1.2 Project Objective
The main objective of this project is to design a 3-storey school building that will
be used to provide additional classrooms for the secondary and tertiary level students of
the beneficiary institution, Rizal Experimental Station and Pilot School of Cottage
Industries (RESPSCI). This will include architectural and structural plans for the school
building and will be eco-friendly, as per the citys campaign, PASIG Green City.
Rainwater Harvesting will help in conserving water that will decrease the water
consumption in the building.
1.3 Design Norms Considered
The design norms considered for this project consist of 3, namely Cost effective,
Minimalism and Eco-friendly.
The design should be cost effective. Every material to be used is to be carefully

analyzed to meet the standard of cost and quality. This project is not aiming for high cost
and high quality building but rather the maximum with optimum cost without risking the
safety of occupants.
The design should follow the minimalism concept. The term minimalism is used
to describe a trend in design and architecture where the subject is reduced to its necessary
elements. Space is very important in designing a classroom because this space will
determine the capacity of students that could occupy the building. Thus, designing with
minimalism concept will help provide ample space for the students.
4
Finally, the design should be eco-friendly. In a world where global warming and
climate change threatens very own existence, (we should find) alternative and eco-
friendly approach should be used so as not to contribute more to the effect. Also, the city
of Pasig is committed to be a green city in the next few year, thus, it is necessary to
design this building environment- friendly.
1.4 Major and Minor Areas of Civil Engineering
Structural Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering and Water Engineering are the

three (3) fields of civil engineering covered. The project focuses of the field of structural
engineering wherein the researches will propose a design of a 3-storey school building.
The Geotechnical aspect will be responsible for the design of the foundation of the
structure as soil bearing capacity of the site will be determined. Water Engineering was
incorporated with the project because it will adopt the concept of Rain Water
Harvesting.
1.5 The Project Beneficiary
The proposed 3-storey school building will benefit the Local Government of
Pasig city. With this project, the country is one step forward in solving the classroom
shortage of the education sector. Another beneficiary will be the administration of Rizal
Experimental Station and Pilot School of Cottage Industries (RESPSCI). This project will
help the institution to deliver a better quality of education to its students.
1.6 The innovative Approach
This project will be utilizing technology and software to help produce better
designs and save time. The following are the tools that we are going to use:
AutoCAD
This software will help in making plans, detailed drawings, layouts for
architectural and structural drawings of this project.
Etabs
This software will help in the analysis and design of structural elements
like frames, slabs and beams. This can also check the adequacy and stability of
the structure.
5
Microsoft Office
This software will help in compiling everything for the final proposal and
defense of this project. Microsoft Word will be used to compile and prepare the
proposal for this project, Microsoft PowerPoint will be utilized in preparing
presentations for the defense and Microsoft Excel will be used as a computer for
structural element design.
1.7 The Research Component
The 3-storey School Building will be incorporated with a rainwater harvesting

system. This facility will collect the rain water catchment, through its piping system and
will be stored in its storage tank. The rainwater collected will be recycled. The recycled
water will only be used for external use, like general cleaning, flushing of toilets,
watering of plants and sprinklers in case of fire. Since the building will be using recycled
water for external use, the water demand and consumption will be less than the usual,
thus, saving money, conserving water and being able to use resources more effectively.
1.8 The Design Component
In this project, the following components will be designed:
Substructure
The design of the substructure will depend on the strength or soil bearing
capacity of the site. Included here is the conduct of soil investigation of the site.
Superstructure
The design of the super structure includes the following structural

elements:
- Design of Beams
- Design of Columns
- Design of Slabs
- Design of Roof Truss
.
Rainwater Harvesting System
The rainwater harvesting system will include the piping system, storage
tank and its components in the school building.
6
The design of superstructure and substructure will be in accordance to the specifications

and standards stated in National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP, 2010)
1.9 Sustainable Design Concept
The concept of sustainable development means sustainable in three (3) areas

environment, economy and community (Global Development Research Center, GDRC)
The rain water harvesting system in this project will promote environmental protection
and conservation of water because will utilize rainwater to be reused again for other
purposes. On the economic aspect, poverty and illiteracy will be lessened as the school
will give the marginalized individuals an opportunity to learn and acquire knowledge that
they can use to alleviate themselves from poverty, thus, it promotes not only economic
but also social progress for the community in which they are included.
7
CHAPTER 2
ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION REPORT
2.1 Project Description
2.1.1 Project Rationale
The dismal state of the public schools in the Philippines is definitely alarming.
Going to school is an appropriate preparation for future endeavors, whatever they may
be. It is the goal of the project to provide a public school that will be composed of
secondary and tertiary level and to provide a basic education for students. The sole
purpose of the project is to give education to students and give everyone equal
opportunity as a means to succeed in life. It will also be an aim of the project to be a high
quality school so it can be a positive environment for young learners to develop their
social skills and personality. And, what better way to educate people about conserving
and recycling water than by starting it while they are still young. It is also a purpose of
the project to make students realize the importance of water in the community and how it
can be re-used and recycled.
2.1.2 Project Location
The project will be located at Jennys Ave. Barangay Maybunga, Pasig City. The
site is located within the vicinity of Rizal Experimental Station and Pilot School of
Cottage Industries (RESPSCI). Due to an electrical faulty wiring, the 2-storey building of
the institution that contains 6 high school classrooms was burned down a few years ago.
The administration was forced to abandon the building because of the threat to the safety
of the students. The group proposed the location to further help the institution in their
mission to educate and help students to attain a good quality education by providing
additional classrooms. The total land area of RESPSCI is about 2 hectares.
8
Figure 1: This show the exact location of site in satellite view
Figure 2: This show the exact location of site and nearby streets
9
2.1.3 Project Information
Some of the public schools in the Philippines have now instituted a shifting policy
so that there are day and afternoon classes per classroom to address the lack of
classrooms. There can be up to 60 to 70 students in a class. This is one of the cases that
the project is going to avoid. The construction of this three-storey school building will
provide a proper and orderly accommodation for the student. This will include
classrooms which will have a design that can contain a great number of students. And,
since it is a three-storey school building, the safety of the student will be the main
concern in constructing the plan for the structure.
Also, due to the lack of fund of the government, and raw water consumption is
costly, a number of public schools in the country do not have running water, which is
commonly use in laboratories and other activities. The project will introduce a Rainwater
Harvesting System to provide recycled water, though it is not potable, it will be used on
non-human contact purposes. The Rainwater Harvesting System works by collecting
water from rain. It treats the water for reuse, general cleaning, and toilet flushing.
2.1.4 Description of Project Phases
The project comprises of four (4) phases. The Pre-Construction/Pre-Development

Phase includes the things to be done prior to the construction of the project like
Feasibility study and procurement of necessary permits, Construction/Development
Phase is the phase where excavation and construction of the structure is at full-swing,
Operational Phase is the phase where the building is ready to be used by the occupants
and serves its purpose to the community, and Abandonment Phase is the phase where the
building can no longer service the occupants due to wear/tear, age and damage it
accumulated during the years of service.
2.1.5 Pre- Construction/ Pre-Development Phase
Feasibility Study
Planning and Design
Study on Environmental Impacts
Preparing Project Description Report
Acquiring necessary permits and documents
10
2.1.6 Construction/ Development Phase
Staking out
- Surveying and marking of lot boundaries
Clearing and Grubbing
- Removal of Trees, slumps, roots and other obstruction which can hinder
the construction of the structure.
Excavation works
- Excavation of land for the construction of foundations and footings.
Construction
- Construction of Substructure elements and Superstructure element.
Installation of Water and Sewer Lines
- Installation and organization of water and sewer piping system to be

connected to the water company (Maynilad/Manila Water).
Installation of Rain Water System
- Installation of rainwater system, and its components.
Installation of Power Distribution System
- Installation of Power Lines to be connected to the electrical company

(MERALCO).
Finishing
- Detailing works and final inspection of the building.

11
2.1.7 Operational Phase
The school building will be used by the students in relation to the school activities
to be done. They will be supervised by their respective subject teachers all through-out
the school hours. The curriculum and lesson plans will be in accordance to the standards
set by the Department of Education (DepEd) and the School Principal will be the one
who will supervise the implementation of these standards. The Solid Waste will be
collected daily under the supervision of the Maintenance Department as well as the
operation of the Rainwater Harvesting System. The treated water from the facility is for
external use only and not meant to be drunk. .
2.1.8 Abandonment Phase
Since the structure will be used to serve the public, safety must be ensured at all
times. Thus, certain conditions were set in determining whether the structure must be
abandoned or not.
a) When the damages in structural elements had been accumulated as a result of the
number of years it has been used and the damages from the disasters it had
resisted in its service life.
b) When the damages threatens the safety of occupants.
Once the building is to be abandoned, the abandonment phase will begin with the
following:
Removal and Relocation

Demolition
Transfer of Unused Materials
Scraps and Wastes Transport Removal
Remediation of Contaminated Sites
12
2.2 Description of Environmental Setting and Receiving Environment
2.2.1 Physical Environment
The location of the project will be at Jennys Avenue Ext, Barangay Maybunga,
Pasig City. Maybunga is one of the barangays in District 2 of Pasig City with 177.37 ha
of land area. Buildings that can be found at the site are schools houses and town center
and restaurants are just near the barangay.
There was still an abandoned building in the lot location. This study will assume
that the building has been demolished by the government and the administration of
RESPSCI. The area was along Minor road, with residential buildings alongside the
abandoned building. Also, around the area, there are a lot of vacant lots found. A creek
can also be found within the vicinity of the place. Considering the installation of water
pipes and drainage system, it will not be so much of a difficulty since there are already
pipelines fixed in the lot. As for the air, since there are a lot of factories and warehouses
in Pasig city, the problem of air pollution cannot be avoided.
2.2.2 Biological Environment
Pasig is primarily residential and industrial but has been becoming increasingly
commercial in recent years. The structures that can be found in the city are factories,
warehouses, establishments and commercial. There are still plants and trees that can be
found in the city. The common plants that can be seen in the site are Ampalaya, Atis,
Bayabas, and Banana. In the streets and other houses in Pasig, many animals can also be
found like, dogs, cats, frogs, rats. For the water environment, the most popular bodies of
water that can be found in Pasig is the Pasig River. The Pasig River connects the Laguna
de Bay and Manila bay. Its major tributaries are San Juan River and Marikina River. The
most common living organism that can be found in Pasig River are janitor fish since it is
polluted nowadays. The air quality in Pasig can be considered polluted because of the
major factories build in the city.
2.2.3 Socio- Cultural, Economic and Political Environment
Pasig City is one of the municipalities of Metro Manila and was once the capital
of the province of Rizal. The current population of the city is 617,301. The people living
in the city are Tagalog and most of the locals are Roman Catholic.
13
Pasig City is politically subdivided into 30 barangays and grouped in two

districts. The first district includes the southern and western of the city, and the northern
and eastern parts are included in the second district. The local government of Pasig was
headed by Mayor Robert Eusebio since 2007 and Vice Mayor Rosalio Martines.
In terms of the economy, the financial resources of Pasig is primarily

concentrated at the western part of the city. It includes numerous factories, warehouses,
establishments and commercial facilities. Residential areas are located in the east part.
Pasig city is considered as one of the top business districts in Metro Manila since there
are also a lot of high-rise buildings, condominiums, commercial establishments, schools
and malls located in the city. The known establishments and institutions that can be found
in the district are The University of Asia and the Pacific (UA&P), one of the most
exclusive universities in the country, the head office of the Integrated Bar of the
Philippines, the head office of Meralco, and many more.
2.2.4 Future Environmental Conditions without the Project
If the proposed project was not constructed, the location is, as of now, has an
abandoned structure built in it. There are still plans of demolition of the building since it
is government owned but the government still does not have specific plans to construct
another building in it. There are maintenance crew around the vicinity to provide
protection and safeguarding of the building.
14
2.3 Impact Assessment and Mitigation
2.3.1 Summary Matrix of Predicted Environmental Issues/Impacts and their Level

of Significance at Various Stages of Development
Table 2: Summary Matrix of Predicted Environmental Issues/Impacts and their Level of

Significance at Various Stages of Development
Environmental Significance of Impacts Mitigation/

Phase of Predicted
Component Enhancement
Development Impact D/I L/S R/I
Likely To be Measures
Regular
Construction/ Air D S R watering of
Dust exposed ground
Abandonment Generation
Phase Provide mask
People D S R
to workers
Construction/ Earth Safe storage of

Abandonment Moving Land D L R unsuitable
Phase Activities removed soil
Have a
temporary
waste disposal
Construction/ area
Water
Abandonment People D S R
Pollution
Phase
Provide
temporary toilet
and bath
Provide safety
Construction/ equipment
Abandonment Accidents People D S R Implement no

Phase safe gear no
work policy
15
Avoid using
Construction/ noisy heavy
Noise construction
Abandonment People D S R
Pollution equipment
Phase
Proper product
Construction/ Offensive
People D S R storage, hauling
Odor
Abandonment and transfer
Phase
Hazards to Provide fence

Construction/
adjacent People D S R to the perimeter
Abandonment structures of site
Phase
Provide early
People warning
Construction/ devices
Road
Abandonment D S R Implement a
Traffic
Phase strict delivery
Land
of construction
materials
2.3.2 Brief Discussion of Specific Significant Impacts on the Physical and Biological
Resources
Sources of Environmental Impact:
a. Noise Pollution (Low Impact)
Noise doesnt have much effect on the physical and biological aspect
because the noise that it will produce will be minimal knowing that the students
who will benefit in the project are students and this noise is still manageable.
16
b. Air Quality (Low to moderate Impact)
The proposed project will have no effect on the vicinity because the project
will not generate any air pollution that will affect the air quality of the area but
since the location is near the main road, theres a chance of air quality impact
because of the too many vehicles passing on the road at any time of the day.
c. Flora and Fauna (Negligible Impact)
Vegetation of the location of the project is limited to grass, shrubs, and

bushes. There are no exotic animals seen in the area of the project. Animal life is
only limited to small insects and there are no domesticated animals that graze in the
area due to the location of the project that is within the city and is near the main
road.
2.3.3 Brief Discussion of Significant Socio- Economic Effect/ Impacts of the Project
The change in community demography will eventually have an effect on the

population of the place because if they like the services that the school offers, they will
have an increase of enrolees as well as the population of the place. Because of this
development, the employment rate of the area will increase. Not only for a short term
job opportunity like during the construction phase of the project but also for the long-
term job opportunities like be a personnel in the school or work in the nearby
establishment.
17
2.4 Environmental Management Plan
2.4.1 Summary Matrix of Proposed Mitigation and Enhancement Measures,

Estimated Cost and Responsibilities
Table 3: Summary Matrix of Proposed Mitigation and Enhancement Measures,

Estimated Cost and Responsibilities
Significant
Mitigating/Enhancement
Environmental Possible Impacts Responsibilitie
Measure
Impact s
Regular maintenance of
Increase in heavy equipment &
noise levels transport machineries to Contractor
1) Climate and and vibrations. check on noise & vibration
Air Quality levels.
Control dust and generated

by vehicle traffic
Provide notice to
Traffic landowners of construction
Congestion activities; provide road Contractor
2) Traffic will increase signage
Have crowd control in the

area
Causes Association
pollution and Regular garbage collection
3) Solid waste
spread of shall be done
disease
Existing plants
and trees will
Make sure the construction Developer
almost likely
4) Ecological is not emitting anything that
to be
may harm people
completely
wiped out
18
Increase in
local and More business opportunities
5) Socio- will crop-up
national
economic
government
revenue
2.4.2 Brief Discussion of Mitigation and Enhancement Measures
For the Mitigation and Enhancement Measures, the researches made use of the
usual measures that are used in constructions. They integrated the impacts with the
mitigation measures. First, it has climate and air quality. The air quality is a very
important factor since not only the people inside the premises will be affected but also
others who are near to the site. Possible impact are increased in noise levels and
vibrations because in construction, exaction is needed that produces noise and vibrations
that will affect the near premises. Second is the traffic problem. During the construction
in the vicinity of the project site road in the front and at the back will be affected and will
cause traffic. They providing signage and notice will help; control the traffic to
overcrowd the area. Third is solid waste problems, this problem is very common in every
construction because it produces pollution. In order to control this problem regular bag
collection is important. Fourth are the ecological issues. The health of the laborers and of
the people in the area must be secured and make sure that the construction is not emitting
anything that may harm anyone. Lastly, socio-economic issues pertain to the business
opportunities.
2.4.3 Monitoring Plan
In the process of construction we will assign a person to make sure that each and
every mitigation and enhancement measures that we have will then be followed. The
monitoring must be strictly followed to ensure safety.
Table 4: Monitoring Plan

Impact Measure Monitoring
Climate and Air Quality Masks, Suits Daily
Traffic Notice; Signage Daily
Solid Waste Garbage Collection Daily

19
Ecological Check emissions Daily
Socio-Economic Business Opportunities Daily
2.4.4 Contingency Plan
If the proposed project was not constructed, the location is, as of now, has an
abandoned structure built in it. There are still plans of demolition of the building since it
is government owned but the government still does not have specific plans whether to
construct another building in it. There are maintenance crew around the vicinity to
provide the protection and safe guarding of the building.
2.4.5 Institutional Responsibilities and Agreements
The purpose of the project is to design a school building for elementary and
secondary level students. The design of the project will be based on the NSCP (National
Structural Code of the Philippines). The project will also follow and comply with the
requirements needed by the local government of Area. It also needs to meet the terms of
the Department of Education concerning the rules and regulations in designing a school
building. Regarding the environmental concern, the project will follow the Republic Act
No. 6541, an act to ordain and institute a National Building Code of the Philippines. This
act is also known as the National Building Code of the Philippines. The purpose of this
code is to provide for all buildings a framework of minimum standards and requirements
by guiding, regulating and controlling their location siting, design, quality of materials,
and maintenance. The code also states to safeguard life, health property, and public
welfare, consistent with the principles of environmental manageme nt and control.
20
CHAPTER 3
THE RESEARCH COMPONENT
3.1 Abstract
The shortage of classrooms is one of the leading dilemmas in public school here
in the Philippines. The lack of budget allocated for education was the main reason the
problem was occurring. This article is based on the Design of Three Storey Public School
Building with Rainwater Harvesting System in Maybunga, Pasig City. The proposed
extension building was designed to be economical for the government to satisfy the
funding. The three storey structure will, in addition, offer additional classrooms for Rizal
Experimental Station and Pilot School of Cottage Industries (RESPSCI). A Rainwater
Harvesting System was incorporated with the building for secondary external use of
water that will also help reduce the monthly water consumption. The system works by
collecting rainwater through a storage tank.
3.2 Introduction
For years, the Philippine government has been struggling with the ways to
manage effectively waste water issues and the increasing rate of water-borne diseases in
urban communities. In 2004, the Philippine Clean Water Act was enacted, mandating all
local government units to share the responsibility in the management and improvement of
water quality within their territorial jurisdiction. This was a way to pressure the local
government to address waste water issues that were the main cause of much
environmental damage. Over 90 percent of all sewage generated in the Philippines is not
treated and has been disposed directly to the bodies of water. Water-borne diseases
accounted for nearly 31% of all reported illness from 1996-200 and economic-losses
from these diseases alone exceed up to 2.3 billion peso a year. (United Nations Economic
and Socia Commission for Asia and the Pacific)
To reduce the risks of water-borne diseases caused by wastewater, cities around

Metro Manila have started requiring building owners to install sewage treatment plants.
This is very evident in Quezon City which is compliant to the city ordinance on
environment-friendly technologies. In 2009, the Former mayor Feliciano Belmonte, Jr.
directed the city building official to oversee the implementation of the policy included in
the approved Green Building Ordinance. Mayor Belmonte pointed out that having
wastewater treatment facilities will help cut down hazardous substances emission from
21
buildings and other structures. In particular, malls and hospitals are those required to
maintain and operate their own sewage treatment plants.
In 2006, The Pasig City local government has started its Pasig Green City
campaign to be the pioneer Green City in the country. This program aims to promote the
development or urban forest and to improve city environment as well as to attain the
desired 1:4 person to tree ratio to develop Pasig City to an environmental friendly city.
According to Mayor Bobby Eusebio, The Pasig Green City is the firm embodiment to
prove that sustainable development is achievable if the same amount of energy can be
devoted in pursuing progress as well as in caring for the environment. Much have
achieved in the past years, there is much to be done with the twin issues of global
warming and climate change and their effects becoming more apparent and cannot afford
to be complacent with what have been achieved. Since its inception in 2006, the Green
City Program of Pasig City has surpassed its target of planting 20,000 trees by 2010 and
has reduced its solid waste by 29% through the implementation of waste segregation and
recycling programs. (Pasig City Government, 2010)
The shortage of water supply also is a big problem in the Philippines. From
February to July of 2010, thirsty El Nio drank up most of Angat Dam's water supply.
According to reports, a hundred municipalities from Paranaque to Cavite
underwent water rationing in 2010. Malabon and Navotas residents had parched lips for
an estimated 12 to 14 hours at the time. In the last part of July and in early November
2010, Maynilad cut water services in Malabon. The supply stoppage lasted for close to 24
hours, due to an interconnection of the 300-meter pipeline along Tanza Bridge. As early
as October 2010, the water level at Angat Dam was again low, and the residents of
Mindanao experienced power outages because their hydroelectric power plants were
unable to get water from Lake Lanao. (Cruz, J., 2011)
With this, the school building with rainwater harvesting system will address the
problems in water management to prevent the increase of water-borne diseases and to
conserve water. The building will also take part in the Pasig Green City campaign and
build an environmental- friendly structure.
3.3 Review of Related Literature
Introduction and Brief History of Rain Water Harvesting System
Rainwater harvesting is a technology used for collecting and storing rainwater

from rooftops, the land surface or rock catchments using simple techniques such as jars
and pots as well as more complex techniques such as underground check dams.
Commonly used systems are constructed with three principal components; namely, the
22
catchment area, the collection device, and the conveyance system. The history of
rainwater harvesting in Asia can be traced back to about the 9th or 10th Century and the
small-scale collection of rainwater from roofs and simple brush dam constructions in the
rural areas of South and South-east Asia. Rainwater collection from the eaves of roofs or
via simple gutters into traditional jars and pots has been traced back almost 2 000 years in
Thailand (Prempridi and Chatuthasry, 1982).
Various levels of governmental and community involvement in the development

of rainwater harvesting technologies in different parts of Asia must be noted. In Thailand
and the Philippines, both governmental and household-based initiatives played key roles
in expanding the use of this technology, especially in water scarce areas such as northeast
Thailand. Rainwater harvesting has long been used in the Loess Plateau regions of China.
Rainwater harvesting is an accepted freshwater augmentation technology in Asia. While
the bacteriological quality of rainwater collected from ground catchments is poor, that
from properly maintained rooftop catchment systems, equipped with storage tanks having
good covers and taps, is generally suitable for drinking, and frequently meets the WHO
drinking water standards. Rooftop catchment, rainwater storage tanks can provide good
quality water, clean enough for drinking, as long as the rooftop is clean, impervious, and
made from non-toxic materials (lead paints and asbestos roofing materials should be
avoided), and located away from over-hanging trees since birds and animals in the trees
may defecate on the roof.(The Global Development Research Center)
Advantages and Disadvantages of Rainwater Harvesting
Rainwater harvesting technologies are simple to install and operate. Local people
can be easily trained to implement such technologies, and construction materials are also
readily available. Rainwater harvesting is convenient in the sense that it provides water at
the point of consumption, and family members have full control of their own systems,
which greatly reduces operation and maintenance problems. Running costs, also, are
almost negligible. Water collected from roof catchments usually is of acceptable quality
for domestic purposes. As it is collected using existing structures not specially
constructed for the purpose, rainwater harvesting has few negative environmental impacts
compared to other water supply project technologies. Although regional or other local
factors can modify the local climatic conditions, rainwater can be a continuous source of
water supply for both the rural and poor. Disadvantages of rainwater harvesting
technologies are mainly due to the limited supply and uncertainty of rainfall. Adoption of
this technology requires a *bottom up* approach rather than the more usual *top down*
approach employed in other water resources development projects. This may make
rainwater harvesting less attractive to some governmental agencies tasked with providing
23
water supplies in developing countries, but the mobilization of local government and
NGO resources can serve the same basic role in the development of rainwater-based
schemes as water resources development agencies in the larger, more traditional public
water supply schemes.(The Global Development Research Center)
Harvesting water as a conservation technique
Water is a scarce resource in the tropics. It is a fact that the Philippines has a
clearly defined rainy or wet season in which there is much precipitation in the form of
rain. Since there is no efficient water management system, this rainwater is typically
wasted by its flowing into the underground sewers (and maybe even flooding) while
during summer there is a shortage of water. An environment-friendly system that would
be beneficial in the Philippines is the rainwater harvesting system. Such a system has the
objective of collecting and storing rainwater for domestic uses at a later time. This is
particularly useful in lowering water bills during the times of water shortage. It also
lowers the volume of rainwater that passes through sewage systems, while also reaping
the environmental advantages of efficient water use.
Rainwater management and conservation, is a solution to unabated population

growth coupled with high demand for dependable and safe water supply. As suggested,
every household needs to become part of the rainwater conservation system. Developing
reliable sources of water is technically difficult, time-consuming, often not
environmentally sound and may not be efficient. Likewise, the assistance from the
government may have some limitations. Rainwater harvesting system has several salient
features such as: 1) high quality crystal clear water; 2) absence of chemical treatment; 3)
minor maintenance, no running cost; 4) easy in design and construction; and 5)
sustainability.(De Guzman, 2011)
3.4 Methodology
To be able to attain the project objectives, the group will start by collecting data
for rain fall and the soil bearing capacity of the site. This can be done by gathering
secondary information from the existing data from PAGASA and the City Engineers
office of Pasig City. After this, Plans will be done including Architectural e.g. Floor
Plans, Elevation, Perspective and Structural Plan. Also, the researchers will design the
roof for the catchment system and the storage tanks for the rain water harvesting system.
After the design process, the estimation of cost will be conducted to know how much the
project will cost.
24
START
`
Conceptualization and
Proposal
Data Gathering
Soil Investigation and Rainfall Data from

Surveys/ interviews PAGASA
Data Organization and

Planning
Architectural Plans Design of Rainwater

Harvesting System
Design of
Superstructure
Design of Substructure
Evaluation
NOT OK
OK
Conclusion/
Documentation
End
Figure 3: Methodology Flow Chart

25
3.5 Results and Discussion
The Rainwater Harvesting System in the Philippines
In the Philippines, there is so much rain that every year there are also flooded
cities and towns .While water is admittedly a scarce resource in the tropics, it is a fact
that the Philippines has a clearly defined rainy or wet season in which there is much
precipitation in the form of rain. This rainwater is typically wasted by its flowing into
underground sewers (and maybe even flooding) while during the summer months there is
a shortage of water.
A green building system that would be very useful in the Philippines would be the
rainwater harvesting system. Such a system has the objective of collecting and storing
rainwater for domestic uses at a later time. This is useful in lowering water bills during
the times of water shortage. It also lowers the volume of rainwater that passes through
sewage systems, while also reaping the environmental benefits of efficient water use.
Setting up system
The very first step would be to determine the intended uses of the saved water.
Typically a rainwater harvesting system can be used for watering plants, flushing toilets
and sprinklers in case of fire emergency. It is also already possible to use rainwater for
drinking, though this will need high cost facilities for water treatment. Different uses for
the water will require different processes and equipment.
Rainwater collection
There are definitely many ways in which rainwater can be collected. The simplest
form would be to leave a drum or tank open during the rainy season for gardening uses.
Other more sophisticated methods would include a coordinated network of gutters and
drainpipes that lead the rainwater collected from roof surfaces into a central catch basin.
Rainwater storage
Rainwater is best stored underground since collection will be easier. This is

because gravity will bring the rainwater down to the storage tank without the need for
pumps. There are many options for rainwater storage systems that include various types
of tanks, filters for partially treating the water and mechanisms for overflowing tanks.
These components must be determined accurately for the whole system to work
satisfactorily.
Rainwater distribution
Depending on the uses the rainwater is supposed to fill, the distribution network
will definitely have to be separate from the regular water pipes. Ground-level water needs
may need very little pressure for the water to get around, while higher-floor needs (such
26
as second-story toilets) will have to utilize a pump. Other rainwater distribution methods
would include sprinkler systems that are strategically located to maximize ground area
covered while minimizing water expended and direct pipelines to laundry areas (for
washing clothes) or even to the garage (for washing vehicles).
3.6 Conclusion
The rainwater harvesting system will be advantageous to the structure and its
surroundings as it will immediately control the flooding in the area. It is important these
days to generate such solutions for the continuous rainfalls here in the Philippines. By
utilizing the rainwater, a sustainable system is created which will run without producing
additional pollution in the environment. The harvesting system will also conserve water
that will result to the decrease of the schools monthly water consumption.
Based on the groups cost estimation, the rainwater harvesting system installed in
the building will help conserve 8.23% of the total schools water consumption yearly
provided that there are six 2-storey and one 1-storey building adding to the total cost of
the water bill. Even the relatively small changes in the amount of water that the school
uses can have a major impact in the long run.
27
CHAPTER 4
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN
4.1. Plan Set
4.1.1 Architectural Plans
4.1.1.1 Perspective
Figure 4: Perspective View

28
4.1.1.2 Floor Plans
Figure 5 :
Figure 6 :
29
30
4.1.1.3 Elevation
Figure 7 :
Figure 8 :
31
Figure 9 :
Figure 10 :
32
33
4.1.2 Structural Plans
Figure 11 :
Figure 12 :
34
Figure 13 :
35
36
4.2. Design of Superstructure
4.2.1. Design of Roof Truss
** See Appendices for design calculations
4.2.1.1 Basis of Design
Location: Pasig City
Type of Occupancy: Educational Building
Type of Truss: Howe Truss

Span of Truss, ST = 12.40 meters
Angle of Inclination (Truss), = 17.88
Bay Distance, L = 4.0 meters
4.2.1.2. Summary of Loads
1. Live Loads, LL
2. Dead Loads, DL
a) Self-Weight of Purlins: (use C 3x6) :
b) Weight of GI Roof:
3. Wind Load, WL
WLwindward
WLleeward
4. Ceiling Load, CL :
37
4.2.1.3. Design of Purlins, Sagrods, And Tierods
Design of Purlins (with Sagrods at the midspan)
The section to be used for the purlins of the roof is C3X5. It has an allowable
yield strength is Fy = 170 MPa based from the steel manual. The C3x5s essential
properties are:
Table 5: Properties of Channel Section (C 3x5) for Purlins

C3x5
Weight, w (kg/m) 7.46
Area, A (mm2 ) 948

Section Modulus about X, Sx (x 103
20.21
mm3 )
Section Modulus about Y, Sy (x 103 Orientation
3.87
mm3 )
Reference: Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines (ASEP) Steel
Manual
Design of Sagrods (placed in midspan)
Tti e
Tma x
Design of Tierods (placed in midspan)
Figure 14: Design of Sagrod and Tierod

38
4.2.1.4. Design of Truss Members
The Section to be used for each type of Truss Members

From the Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines (ASEP) Steel Manual
For Top Chords:
2 L 40 x 40 x 5
PROPERTIES:
W = 5.94 kg/m
Area = 758 mm2
Rx = 11.97 mm
Ry = 11.97 mm
Figure 15: Truss Top Chords
For Bottom Chords:
2 L 30 x 30 x 3
PROPERTIES:
W = 2.72 kg/m
Area = 348 mm2
Rx = 8.99 mm
Ry = 8.99 mm
Figure 16: Truss Bottom Chords
For Web Members:

L 40 x 40 x 5
PROPERTIES:
W = 2.97 kg/m
Area = 379 mm2
Rx = 11.97 mm
Ry = 11.97 mm
Figure 17: Truss Web Members

4.2.2. Design of Beams
Table 6:
Figure 18 :
4.2.3. Design of Columns
Table 7:
Figure 19 :
4.2.4. Design of Slabs
Table 8:
**See Appendices for design calculations
Figure 20 :
4.3. Design of Substructure
4.3.1. Soil Investigation
According to the geotechnical report obtained, the building site is covered with
1.50 meters of fill consisting of clayey gravel with sand. Underlying the fill are very soft
to hard silty clay and medium to dense silty sand. Adobe was located 26.5 meters deep
and extending up to 30 meters. The ground water was at 0.85 meters deep.
The natural soils underlying the site investigated are relatively week and cannot
support the structure to be constructed. The estimated allowable soil bearing capacity is
only 30 kPa (650 psf). Since the soil bearing capacity is very low and is not allowed by
the code, it will just be assumed that the soil bearing capacity of the site is 60 kPa (1300
psf) to design the foundation.
** See Appendices for the complete soil investigation report
4.3.2 Design of Foundation
Figure 21 :
Figure 22 :
4.4. Rainwater Harvesting System
In order to effectively design the storage tank of the rainwater harvesting system,
the annual amount of rainfall to be collected must be computed first. The catchment area,
average annual rainfall of the site and the run-off coefficient are the factors to be
considered before we can determine the annual amount of rainfall. Average annual
rainfall data were acquired in the office of Hydro meteorological Data Applications
Section (HMDAS), Hydrometeorology Division (HMD) of PAGASA. The computed
volume of water that can be harvested in a year is 141.418 cubic meters. The tank
capacity and the volume of water required for the dry season can now be computed.
A stainless steel tank was selected to be used as the storage tank of rainwater. The
tank has a capacity of approximately 5300 liters or 1390 gallons. It has a diameter of 170
cm and total height of 287 cm. The 2 tank cost over 200,000 pesos which is about 95
percent of the cost of the rainwater harvesting system. Although its quite expensive, the
technology will later on help you save more in terms of water consumption on rainy days,
The system will act as a secondary source of water to primarily used to flash toilets but
not to drinking.
Also, the group has prepared the layout of the pipes from the collection stage up
to the storage/distribution. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes with diameters 40 and 50
millimeter were used

CHAPTER 5
BUDGET ESTIMATION
Since Rizal Experimental Station and Pilot School of Cottage Industries

(RESPSCI) is a public school, the budget for constructing the extension building will
come from the Department of Education. According to the Department of Budget and
Management, a total Budget of P1.63 Billion will go to the Department of Educations
Public-Private Partnership for School Infrastructure Project (PSIP). DepEd's PSIP
involves the design, construction and maintenance of 9,301 classrooms, some school
furniture and toilet facilities across Regions I, III and IV-A
The material costs used in the budget estimation of the public school building
were consulted from different hardware in Metro Manila. And, it is assumed in this study
that 30% of the material unit cost is for labor.
Based from the information gathered, the cost for constructing a single classroom
of standard size is roughly 1.3 million pesos. Thus, for a project of eleven (11)
classrooms, it would need a budget of 14.3 million pesos. Comparing this with the total
cost of the proposed 3 storey building with eleven (11) classrooms, it would only take
almost eight and a half (8.5) million pesos. This is mainly because the proposed building
was designed to be economical without sacrificing the quality and serviceability of the
structure. Roughly 37% from the original cost can be saved by this proposed school
building compared to the conventional one.
Table 9: CONCRETE WORKS FOR BEAMS
BASE Length Vol. Cement Sand Gravel

BEAM DEPTH(m)
(m) (m) (m3) (bags) (m3) (m3)
B-1 0.25 0.45 75.00 8.44 76.00 5.00 9.00
B-2 0.25 0.45 36.00 4.05 37.00 3.00 5.00
B-3 0.25 0.45 36.00 4.05 37.00 3.00 5.00
B-4 0.25 0.45 36.00 4.05 37.00 3.00 5.00
B-5 0.25 0.45 25.00 2.81 26.00 2.00 3.00
213.00 16.00 27.00
Table 10: SUMMARY FOR BEAMS
Cement Gravel
Level Sand (m3)
(bags) (m3)
Roof 213.00 16.00 27.00
2nd 213.00 16.00 27.00
1st 213.00 16.00 27.00
639.00 48.00 81.00
Table 11: CONCRETE WORKS FOR COLUMNS
Table 11.1: COLUMNS AT GROUND FLOOR

BASE Height Vol. Cement Sand Gravel
COLUMN DEPTH(m) Usage
(m) (m) (m3) (bags) (m3 ) (m3)
C-1 0.6 0.6 3.50 20.00 25.20 227.00 13.00 26.00
C-2 0.35 0.35 3.50 12.00 5.15 47.00 3.00 6.00
274.00 16.00 32.00
Table 11.2: AT 2FLR

(m) (m) (m3) (bags) (m3 ) (m3)
C-1 0.6 0.6 3.32 20.00 23.90 216.00 12.00 24.00
C-2 0.35 0.35 3.32 12.00 4.88 44.00 3.00 5.00
260.00 15.00 29.00
Table 11.3: AT 3FLR
(m) (m) (m3) (bags) (m3 ) (m3)
C-1 0.6 0.6 3.32 20.00 23.90 216.00 12.00 24.00
C-2 0.35 0.35 3.32 12.00 4.88 44.00 3.00 5.00
260.00 15.00 29.00
Table 11.4: SUMMARY FOR COLUMNS

Cement Gravel
Floor Sand (m3)
(bags) (m3)
3RD 260.00 15.00 29.00
2ND 260.00 15.00 29.00
GROUND 274.00 16.00 32.00
Table 12: CONCRETE WORKS FOR SLABS
AREA Thickness Cement Gravel

SLAB Vol. (m3) Sand (m3 )
(m2) (m) (bags) (m3)
3RD 360.00 0.15 54.00 486.00 27.00 54.00
2ND 360.00 0.15 54.00 486.00 27.00 54.00
GROUND 360.00 0.15 54.00 486.00 27.00 54.00
1,458.00 81.00 162.00
Table 13: REINFORCEMENTS FOR BEAMS
Table 13.1: BEAM REINFORCEMENTS PER LEVEL

16mm x 10mm x 16mm 10mm
Length
BEAM 6m Qty 6m Qty Level x 6m Qty x 6m Qty
(m)
(pcs) (pcs) (pcs) (pcs)
B-1 75.00 113.00 84.00 Roof 252.00 232.00
B-2 36.00 42.00 40.00 3rd 252.00 232.00
B-3 36.00 42.00 40.00 2nd 252.00 232.00
B-4 36.00 30.00 40.00 756.00 696.00
B-5 25.00 25.00 28.00
252.00 232.00
Table 14: REINFORCEMENT FOR COLUMNS
Ground Height Bar Bend Total L. of Total L # Main

Usage Total Qty
COLUMN (m) (m) Bar Bend (m) Bars
C-1 3.50 0.20 0.40 3.90 12.00 20.00 156.00
C-2 3.50 0.20 0.40 3.90 8.00 12.00 63.00
2nd Height Bar Bend Total L. of Total L # Main

Usage Total Qty
C-1 3.32 0.20 0.40 3.72 12.00 20.00 149.00
C-2 3.32 0.20 0.40 3.72 8.00 12.00 60.00
3rd Height Bar Bend Total L. of Total L # Main

Usage Total Qty
C-1 3.32 0.20 0.40 3.72 12.00 20.00 149.00
C-2 3.32 0.20 0.40 3.72 8.00 12.00 60.00
Table 15: REINFORCEMENT FOR SLABS
REBAR DIAM.
SLAB AREA (m2 ) REBAR QTY. TIE WIRE (kg)
(mm)
3RD 360.00 850.00 12.00 62.64

2ND 360.00 850.00 12.00 62.64
GROUND 360.00 391.00 10.00 62.64
187.92
Table 16: SUMMARY OF COST
For the Rainwater Harvesting System
The initial cost of the rainwater harvesting system is about seventy (70) thousand
pesos. According to RESPSCI, the school pays Php 70,000 for its monthly water
consumption. With this system, the school can save up to 8.23% every year of their water
consumption.
Table 17: COST - BENEFIT ANALYSIS
cost of rainwater harvesting 69,655.00 pesos

consumption per month 70,000.00 pesos
volume of water used per month 1,234,785.68 cubic meter
volume of water w/ RWH 1,219,394.34 cubic meter
Savings per year 69,127.47 pesos

Savings per month 5,760.62 pesos
% Saved 8.23
SAVINGS CONSUMPTION BILLS TO PAY

in a yr PHP 69,127.47 PHP 840,000.00 PHP 770,872.53
in 3 yrs PHP 207,382.40 PHP 2,520,000.00 PHP 2,312,617.60
in 5 yrs PHP 345,637.33 PHP 4,200,000.00 PHP 3,854,362.67
CHAPTER 6
PROJECTS SCHEDULE
Based from the scheduled generated by the software MS Project 2007, the over-
all estimated duration of the proposed three- storey public school building in Maybunga,
Pasig City is 346 working days. It can be seen in the schedule that majority of the
estimated working days is for civil and structural works which includes foundation
works, rebar laying and concrete pouring of structural members from ground to third
floor, masonry works for the walls and installation of roofing materials. The following
chart shows the detailed estimated duration of each work classification for the project.
Table 18: Detailed Estimated Duration of Each Work Classification for the Project
Classification Duration
Preliminaries 36 days
Site Works 28 days
Civil Structural Works 139 days
Plumbing Works 35 days
Electrical Works 38 days
Architectural Works 63 days
Demobilization 7 days
The chart below shows the manpower requirement for the project.
Table 19: Manpower Requirement
Manpower Quantity
Project Engineer 1
Site Engineer 5
Surveyor 3
Architect 3
Safety Officer 5
Electrical Engineer 2
Administrative Assistant 3
Foreman 5
Carpenter 3
Steelman 4
Painter 5
Electrician 4
Laborers 50
Welder 4
Driver 4
The chart below shows the equipment requirement for the project.
Table 20: Equipment Requirement
Equipment Quantity
Back Hoe 1
Dump Truck 2
Concrete Mixer 2
Compactor 1
Pumpcrete 2
Vibrator 4
Water Pump 2
Rebar Cutting and Bending Machine 3
Minor tools (hammer, shovel, etc) 50
The next chart shows the complete and detailed project schedule generated by MS Project
2007.
Table 21: Project Schedule
CHAPTER 7
PROMOTIONAL MATERIAL
The walkthrough to the Design of Three-storey Public School Building with

Rainwater Harvesting System in Maybunga, Pasig City is generated using the software
Lumion. Lumion is a real-time 3D architectural visualization tool for architects, urban
planners and designers. This software is a serious alternative to traditional rendering or
outsourcing visualization.
Figure 23: Lumion Software
Some snapshots of the walkthrough generated using this software is shown below.
Figure 24: Walkthrough- Front

Figure 25: Walkthrough- Top
Figure 26: Walkthrough- Corridor
Figure 27: Walkthrough- Classroom A

Figure 28: Walkthrough- Classroom B
Figure 29: Walkthrough- Mens CR
Figure 30: Walkthrough- Womens CR

CHAPTER 8
CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY
After the completion of the design of the three-storey school building with
rainwater harvesting system, the group achieved the primary objective of the thesis
project. The group believes that this thesis project will provide additional classrooms for
the secondary and tertiary students of Rizal Experimental Station and Pilot School of
Cottage Industries. The design of the building was also in accordance with the citys
campaign, Pasig Green City. The group consulted the local government of Pasig to be
familiar with the design considerations of the structures built in the city. The rainwater
harvesting system installed in the building will immediately control the flooding in the
area. It is important these days to generate such solutions for the continuous rainfalls here
in the Philippines. The harvesting system will also conserve water that will result to the
decrease of the schools monthly water consumption. Based on the groups cost
estimation, the rainwater harvesting system installed in the building will help conserve
8.23% of the total schools water consumption yearly provided that there are six 2-storey
and one 1-storey building adding to the total cost of the water bill. Even the relatively
small changes in the amount of water that the school uses can have a major impact in the
long run.
The group believes that the planned set created for the school building in Rizal
Experimental Station and Pilot School of Cottage Industries embodies the design norms
that it set out to fulfill in its project. The architectural design of the building was based
with the design of the current buildings erected in RESPCI. The structural design of the
building represents the importance of keeping the students safe. Emphasis is placed not
only on designing a building that was safe, but also keep the building occupants safe.
This necessitated over-designing some of the building components to ensure that the
masonry walls did not crack which often happens in buildings that are still structurally
sound, but it may still give the occupants the impression that the building is not as safe as
it should be.
Several considerations affected the design of the three-storey school building.

One of the most common design changes was to simplify the design to reduce
construction time/cost. The group designed the most economical columns, beams, slabs
and other structures economically to equal the schools budget. The administration of
RESPCSI also received a proposed 1-storey bungalow style building from other
contractors. They estimated that the thesis project saves about 40%-45% of the school
budget compared to the 1-storey building. The designing of the engineer will also add to
the total cost of the plan which is an advantage of the thesis project.
The group believes that the floor plans, 3-D walkthrough, construction plan set,
and the calculations supporting the structural design represent a very effective way to
meet the needs of in RESPCI and to incorporate the design norms that were an important
part of our project.
CHAPTER 9
RECOMMENDATION
The next study must first consider the schools overall persona. Since the
researchers are engineering students, they focused more on the design of the building;
they did not have enough time to center on other issue. Thus, the next researchers should
decide on how they want the school to be viewed by the community, and consider the
ultimate educational goals of the school and the types and ages of students who will be
educated in the facility.
The three-storey school building in Maybunga, Pasig city is a large project which
also needed a great amount of budget. Although the group have designed the most
economical materials for the construction of the building, it is much better if the total cost
of the project will be trimmed down. It will also best for those who will continue
designing the project to monitor the cost estimation of the project. The unit cost of the
materials may increase or decrease as time change. According to the National Statistics
Office (NSO), the annual growth in the wholesale prices of selected construction
materials in the National Capital Region (NCR) based on the Construction Materials
Wholesale Price Index (CMWPI) rise to 2.9% in August 2012 from 2.2% in July 2012.
The annual increment in cement index rise to 3.5% in August from 0.9% in July; lumber
index, 4.3% from 3.9%; G.I. Sheet index, 2% from 1.9% and structural steel index, 4.6%
from 4.2% (Reference: www.census.gov.ph/data/sectordata/cmwp1208tx.html).
On the Geotechnical aspect of the project, it is advisable to conduct further site

investigation. Since the group is only conducting a study, the group only has limited data
when it comes to the soil bearing capacity of the site. Soil investigation for the site will
help the next study be more accurate and can determine the total load pressure that the
soil can grip.
Another remaining design consideration requires both electrical and

mechanical Engineer. Since the group focused more on the structural part of the project,
they were unable to design the electrical and the lighting plans of the building. The
electrical engineers could also design all the wiring for the computers, lights, and wall
plugs. As for the mechanical engineers, they could design all of the duct work and the air
conditioning unit for some of the classrooms. Mechanical engineers can also do plumbing
design of the building. They would need to determine the necessary slope of the pipes,
where the existing plumbing runs in the school, and where to connect the new pipes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The group would like to extend their whole-hearted gratitude and appreciation to
the following personages and establishments whose never- ending assistance, support,
and efforts helped for the accomplishment and success of this project proposal.
First, to our dear and ever understanding parents, Mr. and Mrs. Abanador, Mr.
and Mrs. San Pedro, and Mr. and Mrs. Regorosa, we extend our deepest appreciation for
their financial and moral support that helped the development of our thesis project. Also,
we would like to thank them for understanding us when we stayed late all night working
and for encouraging us during the darkest days of our lives.
Second, to our very industrious and patient Thesis Adviser, Engr. Divina
Gonzales, whose support and trust kept us to get going to what we have started. In times
of hopelessness, her words of encouragement let us set aside our doubts and uncertainties
regarding the feasibility of our thesis proposal. We thank her for staying with us and
guiding us throughout the term.
Third, to Engr. Fibor Tan and Dr. Francis Aldrine Uy, our CE200L professors, we
thank them for their assistance and guidance, especially, during the formulation of our
thesis problem and title. For the constructive criticisms they gave us before the oral
defense. It was very helpful and made us to see the big picture.
Fourth, to the employees of the Department of Education - Division of Pasig City,
for the over whelming reception they gave us during the time when we were looking for a
potential site to be our project location for our proposal. They became an instrument for
us to complete this thesis proposal.
To the institution of Rizal Experimental Station and Pilot School of Cottage
Industries (RESPSCI) for cooperating with us and allowing their school vicinity to be
used as our potential site for the design of this proposal. As a sign of our gratitude, we
hope to that this proposal will give them ideas for their future projects in providing good
quality education for your students.
And lastly, we really thank the Heavenly Father for keeping us in His safe arms
and guiding us throughout the duration of this study. Without His presence, it would be
next to impossible for us to finish and complete this thesis proposal. For the past three
months, He was the one who kept us safe from harm whenever we proceed to different
institutions to ask for help and answers to our inquiries.
REFERENCES
Cruz, J. (2011, April 4). Philippine water shortage: Agua Vendetta? Retrieved December 16,
2011, from Philippine Online Choronicles: http://www.thepoc.net/thepoc-
features/mukhang-pera/mukhang-pera-features/11616-philippine-water-shortage-
agua-vendetta.html
De Guzman, C. (2011, December). Harvesting water as a conservation technique. Retrieved

March 16, 2012, from Bureau of Agricultural Research:
http://www.bar.gov.ph/barchronicle/2008/june2008_features.asp
De Jesus, A. (2007, May 19). The rainwater harvesting system. Retrieved March 16, 2012, from
Inquirer News:
http://www.inquirer.net/specialreports/watercrisis/view.php?db=1&article=20070519-
66830
Pasig City Government. (2010, September 14). Pasig marks anniversary of Green City program.
Retrieved December 7, 2011, from Pasig City Government:
http://www.pasigcity.gov.ph/subpages/news.aspx?nSeq=7
PCIERD. (n.d.). Rainwater Harvesting System, a Practical Solution to Water Shortages. Retrieved
December 16, 2011, from Departmenst of Science and Technology- Sectoral Planning
Council: http://www.pcierd.dost.gov.ph/index.php/submitted-articles/113-rainwater
rainwaterharvesting.org. (n.d.). COMPONENTS OF A RAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEM .

Retrieved December 16, 2011, from rainwaterharvesting.org:
http://www.rainwaterharvesting.org/urban/Components.htm
The Global Development Research Center. (n.d.). Retrieved March 16, 2012, from An
Introduction to Rainwater Harvesting:
http://www.gdrc.org/uem/water/rainwater/introduction.html
The Philippine Star. (2010, April 18). Campaign on rain water harvesting to be launched .
Retrieved December 16, 2011, from PhilStar.com:
http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=567378&publicationSubCategoryId=77
United Nations Economic and Socia Commission for Asia and the Pacific, U. (n.d.). Wastewater
Treatment facility in the Muntinlupa Public Market, Philippines. Retrieved December 5,
2011, from United Nations Economic and Socia Commission for Asia and the Pacific
(UNESCAP):
http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/Water/Muntinlupa/Waste
waterTreatmentFacilityInTheMuntinlupaPublicMktPhilippines.asp
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - DESIGN CRITERIA AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
DESIGN CRITERIA
A. REFERENCES AND STANDARDS
NSCP 6th Edition National Structural Code of the Philippines 2010

UBC 1997 Edition Uniform Building Code
B. DESIGN LOADS
Dead Loads (Table 204-2. Minimum Design Dead Loads)

1. Floor and Floor Finishes
a. Ceramic or quarry tile (20mm) on 13mm mortar bed : 0.77 kPa
2. 100mm Thick Concrete Hollow Block
a. Both faces plastered : 2.11 kPa
Live Load (Table 205-1. Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Live Loads)
1. School Ground Floor Corridors : 4.80 kPa
2. School Corridors above ground floor : 3.80 kPa
3. School Classrooms : 1.90 kPa
4. Exit facilities : 4.80 kPa
Seismic Load (Section 208. Earthquake Loads)
NSCP 103-1 (Occupancy Category) Standard Occupancy Structures
NSCP Table 208-1 (Seismic Importance Factor) I = 1.0
NSCP Figure 208-4 (Referenced Seismic Map of the Philippines) Zone 4
NSCP Table 208-3 (Seismic Zone Factor) Z = 0.40
NSCP Table 208-6 (Seismic Source Type) Type A
NSCP Table 208-4 (Near Source Factor) Na = 1.20
NSCP Table 208-5 (Near Source Factor) Nv = 1.60
NSCP Table 208-2 (Soil Profile Types) Type SE
NSCP Table 208-7 (Seismic Coefficient) Ca = 0.44Na
NSCP Table 208-8 (Seismic Coefficient) Cv = 0.64Nv

NSCP Table 208-11 (Structural System) R = 8.50 (Concrete
Special Moment
Resisting Frames)
N.S.C.P. Provision 208.5.2. (Static Force Procedure)
Design Base Shear ( N.S.C.P. Provision 208.5.2.1)
> >
In Addition, for Seismic Zone 4, the Total Base Shear, V shall also not be less
than the ff:
NSCP 208.5.2.2 (Structure Period)
Method A
T = CT (hn )3/4
CT=0.0853 (for steel moment resisting frames)

=0.0731(for reinforced concrete moment resisting frames)
= 0.0488 (for all other buildings)
hn = Height of structure
Load Combinations (N.S.C.P. 2010 Provision 203.3. Load Combinations using

Strength Design)
Ultimate Quantity, U = 1.2D + 1.0E + f1 L (N.S.C.P. 203-5)

= 1.2D + 1.6L
D = quantity due to Dead Load

E = quantity due to Earthquake Load
L = quantity due to Live Load
f1 = 1.0 for floors in places of public assembly
C. MATERIALS
1. Compressive Strength of Concrete, fc = 21.00 MPa

2. Yield Strength of Reinforcing Steel, fy = 275.80 MPa
3. Unit Weight of Concrete = 2400 kg/m3 = 23.53596 kN/m3
D. FOUNDATION
The foundation shall be mat footing and the allowable soil bearing capacity (from
Attached Soil Investigation Report) is 30 kPa.
PRELIMINARY SIZING OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS
UNIT WEIGHT OF CONCRETE = 23.53596 kN/m3
1. Concrete Slab
Approximate Thickness, h = Slab Panel perimeter / 180
Approximate Thickness, h = (7.50m)(2) + (4.00m)(2)
180
Approximate Thickness, h = 0.12778m
use h = 0.150m
Weight of Concrete Slab = (Slab Thickness )(Unit Weight of Concrete)

Weight of Concrete Slab = (0.150m)(23.53596kN/m3 )
Weight of Concrete Slab = 3.530394 kN/m2
2. Concrete Beam (Sized from the Most Loaded Beam)
Slab Panel Dead Loads
Wt.
Element
(kPa)
Concrete Slab 3.53
Floor Tiles 0.77
Electrical Fixtures 0.18
Plumbing Fixtures 0.18
Total, w 4.65
Weight of C.H.B. wall
Wt. Wt.
Floor Height (m)
(kPa) (kN/m)
3rd 3.32 2.11 7.01
2nd 3.32 2.11 7.01
Ground 3.50 2.11 7.39
Assume Weight of Concrete Beam = 5.0 kN/m
Considering Interior Transverse Beam
WDL = Slab Panel Dead Load + Weight of CHB Wall + Weight of Concrete Beam
Slab Panel Short Span, S = 4.00 m

Slab Panel Long Span, L = 7.50 m
m= (S/L)2
m= 0.2844444
3-m = 2.7155556
WDL = 28.85 kN/m
Floor Live Load,

FFL = 4.80 kPa
WLL = 17.379556 kN/m
Wu = 1.2WDL + 1.6WLL
Wu = 62.43218 kN/m
Actual Mu = (1/12)Wu L2
Actual Mu = (1/12) Wu (7.50m)2
Actual Mu = 292.65084 kN-m
Reinforced Concrete Requirements
= 0.90 (Flexure)
fc' = 21.00 mPa
fy = 275.80 mPa
1 = 0.85 (for fc' 30 mPa)
min = 0.0050761
w = min (fy/fc') =0.0666667

Allow. Mu = fc' w bd2 (1-0.59w)
Allow. Mu = 1.2104400 bd2
Equate Actual Mu to Allow. Mu
29,265,084.36 N-mm = 1.2104400 bd2
Assume values for b to compute d

h=
b (mm) d(mm) d+100
200.00 347.69 447.69
250.00 310.98 410.98
300.00 283.89 383.89
Use: 250mm x 450mm (Typical Concrete Beam Section)

Weight = (Concrete Section Area )(Unit Weight of Concrete)
Weight = (0.250m)(0.450m)(23.53596kN/m3 )
Weight = 2.6477955 kN/m < Assumed Weight of Beam = 5.0 kN/m (OK)
UNIFORM DEAD LOADS AND LIVE LOADS FOR FRAME

ANALYSIS
Slab Panel Dead

Loads Weight of C.H.B. wall
Wt. Wt.
Element Wt. (kPa) Floor Height (m)
(kPa) (kN/m)
Concrete Slab 3.53 3rd 3.32 2.11 7.01
Floor Tiles 0.77 2nd 3.32 2.11 7.01
Electrical
0.18 Ground 3.50 2.11 7.39
Fixtures
Plumbing
0.18
Fixtures
Actual Wt. of Concrete Beam = 2.6477955
Total, w 4.65
kN/m
Floor Live Load, FFL = 4.80 kPa
At Exterior Longitudinal
Frame - 1
S (m) = 4.00
At Interior Longitudinal
Frame - 2
S1 (m) = 4.00
S2 (m) = 2.50 m = (S2 /L2 )2 = 0.390625
L2 (m) = 4.00 3 - m = 2.609375
At Exterior Longitudinal
Frame - 3
S (m) = 2.50
L (m) = 4.00
m = (S2 /L2 )2 = 0.39
3 - m = 2.61
At Exterior Transverse Frame - A & J
Span 1-2
S (m) = 4.00
L (m) = 7.50
m = (S2 /L2 )2 = 0.28
3 - m = 2.72
At Exterior Transverse Frame - A & J
Span 2-3
S (m) = 2.50
L (m) = 4.00
m = (S2 /L2 )2 = 0.39
3 - m = 2.61
At Interior Transverse Frame - B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I
Span 1-2
S (m) = 4.00
L (m) = 7.50
2
m = (S2 /L2 ) = 0.28
3 - m = 2.72
Span 2-3
S (m) = 2.50
L (m) = 4.00
m = (S2 /L2 )2 = 0.39
3 - m = 2.61
Summary of Loadings
Frame Span WDL (kN/m) WLL (kN/m)

1-2 18.08 8.69
A
2-3 13.53 4.00
1-2 26.50 17.38
B
2-3 17.41 8.00
1-2 26.50 17.38
C
2-3 17.41 8.00
1-2 26.50 17.38
D
2-3 17.41 8.00
1-2 26.50 17.38
E
2-3 17.41 8.00
1-2 26.50 17.38
F
2-3 17.41 8.00
1-2 26.50 17.38
G
2-3 17.41 8.00
1-2 26.50 17.38
H
2-3 17.41 8.00
1-2 26.50 17.38
I
2-3 17.41 8.00
1-2 18.08 8.69
J
2-3 13.53 4.00
1 Typical 15.86 6.40
2 Typical 20.92 11.62
3 Typical 14.71 5.22
APPENDIX B -1 BEAM DESIGN
DESIGN OF BEAMS
A. BEAM - B1 DESIGN
fr.Frame Analysis
Mu @ Mu @
fy Length
b (mm) d (mm) fc' (mPa) Supports Midspan
(mPa) (m)
(kN-m) (kN-m)
250.00 450.00 21.00 275.80 7.50 126.64 53.90
Mu max
b max w Mu max (N-mm)
(kN-m)
0.03769 0.02827 0.37123 277,401,206.54 277.40
Mu max > Mu @ Supports (Design as Singly Reinforced)

Mu max > Mu @ Midspan (Design as Singly Reinforced)
Tension Reinforcements
Rebar Area of
Mu @ Supports Req'd. NREBARS
Ru As (mm2 ) Diameter Rebar
(N-mm) (pcs)
(mm) (mm2 )
126,638,000.00 2.78 0.01 1,239.19 16.00 201.06 7.00
Rebar Area of
Mu @ Midspan Req'd. 2 NREBARS
Ru As (mm ) Diameter Rebar
(N-mm) (pcs)
(mm) (mm2 )
53,902,000.00 1.18 0.00 499.71 16.00 201.06 3.00
SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
TYPICAL DESIGN OF STIRRUP SPACING
Vu @ Vu @
b d fy Length
fc' (mPa) Supports Supports
(mm) (mm) (mPa) (m) (Shear)
(kN) (N)
250.00 450.00 21.00 275.80 7.50 173.01 173,006.00 0.85
Vc = 85,923.29 N
Vc = 85.92 Kn
(1/2)Vc = 36.52 kN< Vu (Stirrups are needed)
Vn = Vu /
Vn = 203.54 kN
Vs = Vn - Vc
Vs = 117.61 kN
Vs = 117,613.18 N
S = (Av fy d)/ Vs
Stirrup diameter, d = 10mm

Av = Area of stirrup rebar (mm2 )
Av = 78.54
S= 82.88 mm
Maximum Spacing Required by Code
171,846.59 N >Vs = 117,613.18 N
Therefore: Maximum Spacing = d/2 = 450mm/2 = 225mm
Use: 10mm deformed bar stirrups @ 225mm on centers up to mid span.

APPENDIX B - 2 COLUMN DESIGN
DESIGN OF COLUMNS
COLUMN C-1
Material Strength Actual Loads
fc' = 21 MPa Pu = 516.50 KN

fy = 276 MPa Mux = 23.60 KN-m
Muy = 3.90 KN-m
Section Profile eux = 45.69 mm
b = 400.00 mm euy = 7.55 mm
h = 400.00 mm
Ag = 160000 mm2
d= 344.00 mm
d' = 56.00 mm
Dt = 10.00 mm
cc = 38.00 mm 12 D 16 mm
Cb = 235.616 mm
b = 400
Bi - axial Column
Reinforcement Pure Axial Load

Db = 16 mm Po = 3478.8 KN
Nb = 12 pcs Po = 2435.2 KN
Nb, As = 5 pcs a Po = 1948.2 KN
Nb, A's1 = 5 pcs
Nb, A's2 = 2 pcs Pure Bending
Ab = 201 mm2 rg = 0.006
As = 1005 mm2 Mo = 78.1 KN-m
A's1 = 1005 mm2 Mo = 54.7 KN-m
A's2 = 402 mm2
@ Pn = 0.10 Ag fc'
Pn = 336.0
BY BRESLER'S FORMULA
Pnx = 1026.5 KN
Pny = 1450.6 KN
Po = 1948.2 KN
0.10 Po = 278.30797 KN
1 1
= 0.0011503
Pn KN
Pn = 869.37 KN
Pn max = 1558.52 KN
0.10 Po < Pn Safe OK
Pn max > Pn Safe OK
Pu < Pn Safe OK
Therefore:
Column is Safe !
COLUMN C-2
Material Strength Actual Loads
fc' = 21 Mpa Pu = 516.50 KN

fy = 276 Mpa Mux = 23.60 KN-m
Muy = 3.90 KN-m
Section Profile eux = 45.69 mm
b = 400.00 mm euy = 7.55 mm
h = 400.00 mm
Ag = 160000 mm2
d = 344.00 mm
d' = 56.00 mm
Dt = 10.00 mm
cc = 38.00 mm 8 D 16 mm
Cb = 235.616 mm
b = 400
* Bi - axial Column *
Reinforcement Pure Axial Load
Db = 16 mm Po = 3271.2 KN
Nb = 8 pcs Po = 2289.9 KN
Nb, As = 3 pcs a Po = 1831.9 KN
Nb, A's1 = 3 pcs
Nb, A's2 = 2 pcs Pure Bending
Ab = 201 mm2 r g = 0.004
As = 603 mm2 Mo = 47.8 KN-m
A's1 = 603 mm2 Mo = 33.5 KN-m
A's2 = 402 mm2
@ Pn = 0.10 Ag fc'
Pn = 336.0
BY BRESLER'S FORMULA
Pnx = 859.8 KN
Pny = 777.5 KN
Po = 1831.9 KN
0.10 Po = 261.69865 KN
1 1
= 0.0019034
Pn KN
Pn = 525.39 KN
Pn max = 1465.51 KN
0.10 Po < Pn Safe OK !
Pn max > Pn Safe OK !
Pu < Pn Safe OK !
Therefore:
Column is Safe !
APPENDIX B - 3 TWO WAY SLAB DESIGN
DESIGN OF TWO WAY SLAB
Material Properties:
Main Rebars, Fy 275.8 MPa

Shear Rebar, Fy 276.0 MPa
Concrete, Fc' 21.0 MPa
Cover to Tension Bars = 20 mm
Cover to Compression Bars = 20 mm
Concrete Stress Curve: ACI-Whitney Rectangular

Max. Concrete Strain: 0.003
Steel Modulus, Es: 200,000.0 N/mm2
Concrete Density: 24.0 kN/m3
Geometry Data:
Length = 4.00 m
Width = 7.50 m
Thickness = 150 mm
Continuity Case 1: All sides continuous
Slab Dimensions
Cont Short Long Thickness Uniform Uniform

Sr. No Title
Case Side (m) Side (m) (mm) DL (kPa) LL (kPa)
1 Slab-1 1 4 7.5 150 4.65 4.80
Slab Moments
Moment (kN-m)
Design
Cont
Sr. No Slab Load
Case Short Side Long Side
(kPa)
(+ve) (-ve) (+ve) (-ve)
1 Slab-1 1 14.7 10.8 14.3 5.6 7.5
Slab Reinforcement
Reinforcement (mm2 )
Cont Thickness
Sr. No Slab
Case (mm) Short Side Long Side
(+ve) (-ve) (+ve) (-ve)
1 Slab-1 1 150 399 535 206 275
Reinforcing Bars
Rebars
Cont Thickness
Sr. No Slab
Case (mm) Short Side Long Side
(+ve) (-ve) (+ve) (-ve)
12@ 12 @ 10 @ 12 @
1 Slab-1 1 150
250 200 333 333
Rebar Layout Sketches

APPENDIX B - 4 ROOF TRUSS DESIGN
DESIGN OF ROOF TRUSS
BASIS OF DESIGN
Location: Pasig City
Type of Occupancy: Educational Building
Type of Truss: Howe Truss
Span of Truss, ST = 12.40 meters
Angle of Inclination (Truss), = 17.88

Bay Distance, L = 4.0 meters
LOADING COMPUTATIONS
5. Live Loads, LL
Tributary Area= (4)(12.4) = 49.20 m2
= =
Tributary Loaded Area (m2 )

Roof Slope
0 -18.6 18.7-55.8 >55.8
957 766 574
766 670 574
574 574 574
6. Dead Loads, DL
c) Self-Weight of Purlins: (use C 3x6)
d) Weight of GI Roof:
7. Wind Load
Wind Pressure (psf)

Height Zone
Area I Area II Area III
30 20 10
40 30 20
50 35 25
Area: Pasig City (Zone II), q = 30 lb/ft2
- - -
WLwindward = (0.1)
WLleeward = (0.50)
DESIGN OF PURLINS, SAGRODS, AND TIERODS
Design of Purlins (with Sagrods at the midspan)
From Steel Manual, the allowable yield strength is Fy = 170 MPa. The C3x5s
essential properties are:
C3x5
Weight, w (kg/m) 7.46
Area, A (mm2 ) 948

Section Modulus about X, Sx (x 103
20.21
mm3 )
Section Modulus about Y, Sy (x 103 Orientation
3.87
mm3 )
Reference: Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines (ASEP) Steel
Manual
The adequacy of purlins is defined by the governing formula:
where:
fbx &fby = actual bending stress along X and Y axis respectively
Fbx &Fby = allowable bending stress along X and Y axis respectively
NOTE: The section is said to economical if the interaction expression falls under
the range.
Assume the purlins have compact sections, F bx = 0.66Fy and Fby = 0.75Fy where Fy = 170
MPa
Solving total weight, WT Wt
Solving total weight components, Wx and Wy :
WX = WT cos 17.88 o
WX = 653.51 cos 17.88o
Wx = 621.95 N/m
WY = WT sin 17.88o
WY = 653.51 sin 17.88o
WY =200.64 N/m
Solving for the M x and M y :
Solving actual stress along X and Y, fbx and fby :
Solving allowable stress about X and Y, Fbx and Fby :

fbx fby
Solving the interaction expression, :
Fbx Fby
Design of Sagrods (placed in midspan)
Ft =0.6Fy where Fy=248 MPa
Tension on gross area:
Ft = 0.6 (Fy) = 0.6(248) = 148.8 MPa
Design of Tierods (placed in midspan)
FT =0.6Fy where Fy=248 MPa

Tti e
Tma x
Tension on gross area:
Ft = 0.6 (Fy) = 0.6(248) = 148.8 MPa

LOADINGS AND ANALYSIS OF TRUSS
Ceiling Load, CL
Using suspended metal lath and gypsum plaster as ceiling (From NSCP
Vol. 1, Section 2-6, Table 204-2)
Total length of top chord = (2)(6.51) = 13.02 m
Total length of bottom chord = 12.40 m

Total length of web member= 2.00+(2)[0.39+1.31+0.79+1.48+1.19+1.73+1.60+2.03]
Total length of web member= 23.04 m
The Section to be Used for Each Type of Truss Members
From the Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines (ASEP) Steel Manual
For Top Chords: For Bottom

Chords:
2 L 40 x 40 x 5
2 L 30 x 30 x 3
PROPERTIES:
W = 5.94 kg/m PROPERTIES:
Area = 758 mm2 W = 2.72 kg/m
Rx = 11.97 mm Area = 348 mm2
Ry = 11.97 mm Rx = 8.99 mm
Ry = 8.99 mm
For Web Members:
L 40 x 40 x 5
PROPERTIES:
W = 2.97 kg/m
Area = 379 mm2
Rx = 11.97 mm
Ry = 11.97 mm
Self Weight of Truss, SW
Weights
Where:
3Rx = 3731.70 N
4Rx = 4975.60 N
22Ry = 10262.12 N
Support Reactions: R b = RJ = 35.902 KN

TOP CHORD MEMB ER
INTERNAL CROSS-
LENGTH STRESS
MEMBER FORCE SECTIONAL
(m) (MPa)
(KN) AREA (mm2 )
AB 1.20 13.763 (T) 758 18.16
BC 1.25 37.995(C) 758 50.13
CD 1.25 47.909(C) 758 63.20
DE 1.25 46.893(C) 758 61.86
EF 1.25 41.924 (C) 758 55.31
FG 1.25 41.924 (C) 758 55.31
GH 1.25 46.893 (C) 758 61.86
HI 1.25 47.909 (C) 758 63.20
IJ 1.25 37.995(C) 758 50.13
JK 1.20 13.763 (T) 758 18.16
BOTTOM CHORD MEMB ER
CROSS-
LENGTH INTERNAL STRESS
MEMBER SECTIONAL
(m) FORCE (KN) (MPa)
AREA (mm2 )
AT 1.26 4.444 (C) 348 12.77
ST 1.31 3.995 (C) 348 11.48
RS 1.31 43.334 (T) 348 124.52
QR 1.31 51.195 (T) 348 147.11
PQ 1.31 48.574 (T) 348 139.58
OP 1.31 48.574 (T) 348 139.58

NO 1.31 51.195 (T) 348 147.11
MN 1.31 43.334 (T) 348 124.52
LM 1.31 3.995 (C) 348 11.48
KL 1.26 4.444 (C) 348 12.77
WEB MEMB ER
INTERNAL CROSS-
LENGTH STRESS
MEMBER FORCE SECTIONAL
(m) (MPa)
(KN) AREA (mm2 )
BT 0.39 35.642 (C) 379 94.04
CT 1.31 49.459 (T) 379 130.50
CS 0.79 12.446(C) 379 32.84
DS 1.48 9.310 (T) 379 24.56
DR 1.19 2.334 (C) 379 6.16
ER 1.73 3.592 (C) 379 9.48
EQ 1.60 5.010 (T) 379 13.22
FQ 2.03 9.914 (C) 379 26.16
FP 2 18.282 (T) 379 48.24
FO 2.03 9.914 (C) 379 26.16
GO 1.60 5.010 (T) 379 13.22
GN 1.73 3.592 (C) 379 9.48
HN 1.19 2.334 (C) 379 6.16
HM 1.48 9.310 (T) 379 24.56
IM 0.79 12.446 (C) 379 32.84
IL 1.31 49.459 (T) 379 130.50
JL 0.39 35.642 (C) 379 94.04

SUMMARY OF MOST STRESSED MEMB ERS:
INTERNAL CROSS- ACTUAL

LENGTH
MEMBER FORCE SECTIONAL STRESS
(m)
(KN) AREA (mm2 ) (MPa)
CD & HI
1.25 47.909(C) 758 63.20
(TC)
QR & NO
1.31 51.195 (T) 348 147.11
(BC)
BT & JL
0.39 35.642 (C) 379 94.04
(Web)
CT & IL
1.31 49.459 (T) 379 130.50
(Web)
DESIGN OF TOP CHORD
Top Chord Design

Checking the adequacy of the section of the top chord
kL
Solving slenderness ratio and critical slenderness ratio CC
r
Then, the member is an intermediate column
Solving factor of safety,FS

Solving allowable compressive stress,Fa
Interaction Equation: fa / Fa ; where fa = 63.20 MPa<Fa = 85.54

fa / Fa = (63.20/85.54) = 0.739
Since fa <Fa , the section is adequate as a top chord
DESIGN OF BOTTOM CHORD
Bottom Chord Design

Checking the adequacy of the section of the bottom chord
Solving allowable tensile stress FT
Interaction Equation: fT / FT ; where fT = 147.11 MPa< FT = 148.8

fT / FT = (147.11/148.8) = 0.989
Since fT<FT, the section is adequate as a bottom chord.
DESIGN OF WEB MEMBERS
Tension Web Member Design
Checking the adequacy of the section of the tension web member

Solving allowable tensile stress FT
Interaction Equation: fT / FT ; where fT = 130.50 MPa< FT = 148.8

fT / FT = (130.50/148.8) = 0.877
Since fT<FT, the section is adequate as a tension web member.
Compression Web Member Design
Checking the adequacy of the section of the compression web member

kL
Solving slenderness ratio and critical slenderness ratio CC
r
Therefore, the member is an intermediate column
Solving factor of safety,FS
Solving allowable compressive stress,Fa

109
Interaction Equation: fa / Fa ; where fa = 94.04 MPa<Fa = 136.11
fa / Fa = (94.04/136.11) = 0.691
Since fa <Fa , the section is adequate as a compression web member.

110
APPENDIX C - 1 SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT
SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT

111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
APPENDIX C - 2 FOUNDATION DESIGN
DESIGN OF MAT FOUNDATION
Based on the soil investigation report, the natural soils underlying the site are
relatively weak. The estimated allowable soil bearing capacity is only 30 kPa or
650 psf. Since the allowable soil bearing capacity is very low, we can utilize mat
foundation to distribute the loads carried by the columns in a bigger area of
footing which will decrease the bearing pressure between the footing and the
soil. Assume 60 kPa soil bearing capacity since the soil bearing from the
investigation is not allowed by the code.
SUMMARY OF AXIAL REACTIONS OF COLUMNS FROM FRAME ANALYSIS
Point Pu (kN) Point Pu (kN)

1 594.15 17 1,036.72
2 1,094.76 18 1,046.08
3 1,083.07 19 1,422.59
4 1,083.64 20 998.29
5 1,085.33 21 325.10
6 1,077.31 22 472.57
7 799.62 23 529.47
8 806.21 24 532.05
9 1,069.82 25 477.85
10 771.78 26 476.70
11 805.62 27 479.42
12 1,445.18 28 479.98
13 1,432.74 29 508.79
14 1,434.60 30 242.39
15 1,437.58 31 674.31
16 1,426.31 32 781.77
119
q = Q My (x) Mx(y)
A Iy Ix
B = 13m
L = 38m
AREA OF MAT = 494m
Ix = (1/12)BL = 59444.67m^4
Iy = (1/12) LB = 6957.17m^4
Q = Column Loads = 26475.72kN
Determine Location of Q
Q (x') =(7.7m)[Column Loads @ Frame-2] + (10.35m)[Column Loads @

Frame-3]
26475.72kN (x') = (7.7m)[998.29kN+1422.59kN+1046.08kN+1036.72kN

+1426.31kN+1437.58kN+1434.60kN+1432.74kN+1445.18kN+805.62kN]
+(10.35m)[325.10kN+472.57kN+529.47kN+532.05kN+477.85kN+476.70kN+47
9.42kN+479.98kN+508.79kN+242.39kN]
x' = 5.40m from Frame-1
Q (y') =(4m)[Column Loads @ Frame-I] + (8m)[Column Loads @ Frame-H] +

(12m)[Column Loads @ Frame-G] + (16m)[Column Loads @ Frame-F] +
(20m)[Column Loads @ Frame-E] + (24m)[Column Loads @ Frame-D]+
(28m)[Column Loads @ Frame-C] + (32m)[Column Loads @ Frame-B]+
(36.4m)[Column Loads @ Frame-A]
26475.72kN (y') = (4m)[2964.98kN) + (8m)[2381.76kN]

+(12m)[2328.39kN]+(16m)[2981.47kN]+(20m)[2999.61] +(24m)[2997.66kN]+
(28m)[2995.79kN] + (32m)[3048.73kN] +(36.4m)[1642.16kN]
y ' = 18.11m from Frame-J
Eccentricities
ex = x' - 1/2B = - 1.10 m
ey = y' - 1/2L = - 0.89m
120
Moments
My = Q(ex) = 29125.50 kN-m
Mx = Q (ey) = 23505.20 kN-m
Calculate Soil Pressures
q = Q My (x) Mx(y)
A Iy Ix
q = (26475.72kN / 494m) 29125.50 kN-m (x) 23505.20 kN-m (y)

6957.17m^4 59444.67m^4
q = 53.5946 4.1864x 0.39541y
@ Point-A q = 53.5946 + 4.1864(0.78) - 0.39541(3.422)= 55.4859kPa

@ Point-B q = 53.5946 - 4.1864(0.73) - 0.39541(3.422) = 49.2063kPa
@ Point-C q = 53.5946 - 4.1864(1.23) - 0.39541(3.432) = 47.1092kPa
@ Point-D q = 53.5946 - 4.1864(1.23) + 0.39541(3.788) = 49.9641kPa
@ Point-E q = 53.5946 - 4.1864(0.73) + 0.39541(3.778) = 52.0533kPa
@ Point-F q = 53.5946 + 4.1864(0.78) + 0.39541(3.778) = 58.3329kPa
At Strip - AGJF
B1 = 5.275 m
qA = 55.4859 kPa
qF = 58.3329 kPa
qAVE = 56.9094 kPa

Total Soil Reaction = qAVE (B1)(L) = 11407.49 kN
Total Column Load on this Strip = 9465.69 kN
Average Load = [(Total Column Load on this Strip)+(Total Soil Reaction)] / 2
Average Load = 10436.59 kN
Modified Average Soil Pressure, qAVE(MODIFIED) = (qAVE)[ Average Load /

Total Soil Reaction]
qAVE(MODIFIED) = 52.07 kPa
Modified Column Load Factor, F = Average Load / Total Column Load on this
Strip
F = 1.1026
LOAD PER UNIT LENGTH, w = (B1) (qAVE.MODIFIED) = 274.65 kN/m

121
122
LENGTH SHEAR AREA MOMENT

(m) (kN) (sq.m.) (kN-m)
A1 1.00 +274.65 137.32 137.32
A2 1.39 -380.44 -263.49 -126.17
A3 2.61 +718.15 938.91 675.42
A4 1.78 -488.90 -435.15 503.76
A5 2.22 +609.69 676.72 241.57
A6 2.13 -584.47 -621.91 54.81
A7 1.87 +514.11 481.19 -140.72
A8 2.48 -680.68 -843.48 -362.29
A9 1.52 +417.91 317.96 -525.52
A10 2.84 -778.74 -1104.03 -786.07
A11 1.16 +319.85 186.25 -917.78
A12 3.16 -867.96 -1371.50 -1185.25
A13 0.84 +230.63 96.83 -1274.67
A14 2.37 +651.01 -771.56 -674.73
A15 1.63 +447.58 364.70 -406.86
A16 1.61 -441.33 -354.58 10.12
A17 2.39 +657.26 786.46 431.88
A18 1.90 -522.29 -496.61 289.84
A19 2.10 +576.30 604.63 108.02
A20 1.00 -274.64 -137.32 467.31
MAXIMUM POSITIVE (+) MOMENT = 675.42 kN-m

MAXIMUM NEGATIVE ( - ) MOMENT = 1274.67 kN-m
THICKNESS OF MAT
THE CRITICAL PERIMETER COLUMN SECTION FOR

DIAGONAL TENSION SHEAR WILL BE AT THE
COLUMN CARRYING 1094.76 kN LOAD.
bo = (1.825 + 1/2 d) + (1.825 + 1/2 d) + (0.60 + d)

bo = 4.25 + 2d (eq.1)
U = (bo)(d) [ (0.34)(fc')] (eq.2)

123
U = Load Factor (Column Load) = (1.60)( 1094.76 kN) = 1751.616 kN =

1.751616 MN
Substitute U and Eq.1 in Eq.2. ( = 0.85)

1.751616 = (4.25+2d)(d) [ 0.85 (0.34)(21)]
1.323 = (4.25+2d)(d)
2d+4.25d-1.323 = 0
d = 0.28 m
THE CRITICAL INTERNAL COLUMN SECTION

FOR DIAGONAL TENSION SHEAR WILL BE AT
THE COLUMN CARRYING 1445.18 kN LOAD.
bo = (0.6 + d) x 4
bo = 2.40 + 4d (eq.1)
U = (bo)(d) [ (0.34)(fc')] (eq.2)
U = Load Factor (Column Load) = (1.60)( 1445.18 kN) = 2312.288 kN =

2.312288 MN
Substitute U and Eq.1 in Eq.2. ( = 0.85)

2.312288 = (2.40 + 4d)(d) [ 0.85 (0.34)(21)]
1.746 = (2.40 + 4d)(d)
4d+2.40d-1.746 = 0
d = 0.43 m
.: use d = 0.43 m
Concrete Cover = 75mm

Reinforcing Bar Diameter = 20mm
h = d + Concrete Cover + Rebar Diameter = 0.43m+0.075m+0.020m

h = 0.52m say 0.600m
.: use h = 600mm
124
DETERMINATION OF REINFORCEMENT
MAGNITUDE OF MAX. POSITIVE MOMENT, M' = (MAX.+MOMENT)/B1 = 128.04

kN-m/m
MAGNITUDE OF MAX. NEGATIVE MOMENT, M' = (MAX.- MOMENT)/B1 = 300.9
kN-m/m
Mu = (Load Factor)(M') = As fy (d - 1/2a); = 0.90 (FLEXURE)
FOR POSITIVE MOMENT
a = (As fy) / (0.85 fc' b) = [As (275.80)] / [(0.85)(21)(1000mm)]

a = 0.015451 As
Mu = (1.6)(128.04kN-m x 10^6) = 0.90 (As)(275.80mPa)[430mm - 1/2a]

(1.7)(128.04kN-m x 10^6) = 248.22 As [ 430 - 1/2a]; sub a = 0.015451 As
(1.7)(128.04kN-m x 10^6) = 248.22 As [ 430 - 1/2(0.015451As)]
204864000 =106734.60 As - 1.92As
As = 1990.66 mm
As (min) = [1.4 bd]/ fy =[1.4(1000)(430)]/275.80 = 2182.74 mm 2
.: use As = As (min) = 2182.74 mm2
Using 28mm Rebars; Area of Rebar = 490.8738521mm

Spacing = 282.10 mm say 275 mm
POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTS: 28mm deformed bars @ 275mm on

centers
FOR NEGATIVE MOMENT
Mu = (1.6)(300.9kN-m x 10^6) = 0.90 (As)(275.80mPa)[430mm - 1/2a]

(1.6)(300.9kN-m x 10^6) = 0.90 (As)(275.80mPa)[430mm - 1/2(0.015451As)]
481440000 = 106734.60As -1.92As
As = 4951.69 mm
Using 28mm Rebars; Area of Rebar = 490.8738521mm

Spacing = 124.35 mm say 120 mm
NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENTS: 28mm deformed bars @ 120mm on

centers
125
APPENDIX D - RAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEM
DESIGN OF RAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEM
Area of Catchment (A) = 268 sq. m

Average annual rainfall (R) = 355.5 mm (0.3555 m)
Run-off coefficient (C) = 0.85
1. Calculate the maximum amount of rainfall that can be harvested from the rooftop:
Annual water harvesting potential = A X R X C

= 468 x 03555 x 0.85
= 141.418 cu. m (141,418 liters)
2. Determine the tank capacity: This is based on the dry period, the period between the
two consecutive rainy seasons.
For example, with a monsoon extending over six months, the dry season is of 181 days.
3. Calculate water requirement for the dry season
Water Requirement = 181 days x 50 people x 2 lpcd = 18100 liters

126
127
128
129
APPENDIX E - COST ESTIMATE
CONCRETE WORKS
BASE Length Vol. Cement Sand Gravel
BEAM DEPTH(m)
(m) (m) (m3) (bags) (m3) (m3)
B-1 0.25 0.45 75.00 8.44 76.00 5.00 9.00
B-2 0.25 0.45 36.00 4.05 37.00 3.00 5.00
B-3 0.25 0.45 36.00 4.05 37.00 3.00 5.00
B-4 0.25 0.45 36.00 4.05 37.00 3.00 5.00
B-5 0.25 0.45 25.00 2.81 26.00 2.00 3.00
213.00 16.00 27.00
Summary for beams
Level Cement (bags) Sand (m3) Gravel (m3)
Roof 213.00 16.00 27.00

2nd 213.00 16.00 27.00
1st 213.00 16.00 27.00
639.00 48.00 81.00
AT GROUND FLOOR

(m) (m) (m3) (bags) (m3) (m3)
C-1 0.6 0.6 3.50 20.00 25.20 227.00 13.00 26.00
C-2 0.35 0.35 3.50 12.00 5.15 47.00 3.00 6.00
274.00 16.00 32.00

130
AT 2ND FLOOR
(m) (m) (m3 ) (bags) (m3) (m3)
C-1 0.6 0.6 3.32 20.00 23.90 216.00 12.00 24.00
C-2 0.35 0.35 3.32 12.00 4.88 44.00 3.00 5.00
260.00 15.00 29.00
AT 3RD FLOOR
(m) (m) (m3) (bags) (m3) (m3)
C-1 0.6 0.6 3.32 20.00 23.90 216.00 12.00 24.00
C-2 0.35 0.35 3.32 12.00 4.88 44.00 3.00 5.00
260.00 15.00 29.00
Summary for Columns
Floor Cement (bags) Sand (m3) Gravel (m3 )
3RD 260.00 15.00 29.00

2ND 260.00 15.00 29.00
GROUND 274.00 16.00 32.00
AREA Thickness Cement Gravel

SLAB Vol. (m3) Sand (m3)
(m2) (m) (bags) (m3)
3RD 360.00 0.15 54.00 486.00 27.00 54.00
2ND 360.00 0.15 54.00 486.00 27.00 54.00
GROUND 360.00 0.15 54.00 486.00 27.00 54.00
1,458.00 81.00 162.00
131
BEAM REINFORCEMENTS PER LEVEL
16mm x 6m Qty
BEAM Length (m) 10mm x 6m Qty (pcs)
(pcs)
B-1 75.00 113.00 84.00

B-2 36.00 42.00 40.00
B-3 36.00 42.00 40.00
B-4 36.00 30.00 40.00
B-5 25.00 25.00 28.00
252.00 232.00
Level 16mm x 6m Qty (pcs) 10mm x 6m Qty (pcs)
Roof 252.00 232.00

3rd 252.00 232.00
2nd 252.00 232.00
756.00 696.00
Ground Height Bar Bend Total L. of Total L # Main Total

Usage
COLUMN (m) (m) Bar Bend (m) Bars Qty
C-1 3.50 0.20 0.40 3.90 12.00 20.00 156.00

C-2 3.50 0.20 0.40 3.90 8.00 12.00 63.00
2nd Height Bar Bend Total L. of Total L # Main Total

Usage
C-1 3.32 0.20 0.40 3.72 12.00 20.00 149.00

C-2 3.32 0.20 0.40 3.72 8.00 12.00 60.00
3rd Height Bar Bend Total L. of Total L # Main Total

Usage
C-1 3.32 0.20 0.40 3.72 12.00 20.00 149.00

C-2 3.32 0.20 0.40 3.72 8.00 12.00 60.00
132
REBAR DIAM.
SLAB AREA (m2 ) REBAR QTY. TIE WIRE (kg)
(mm)
3RD 360.00 850.00 12.00 62.64

2ND 360.00 850.00 12.00 62.64
GROUND 360.00 391.00 10.00 62.64
187.92
For the Rainwater Harvesting System
COST - BENEFIT ANALYSIS
cost of rainwater harvesting 69,655.00 pesos

consumption per month 70,000.00 pesos
volume of water used per month 1,234,785.68 cubic meter
volume of water w/ RWH 1,219,394.34 cubic meter
Savings per year 69,127.47 pesos

Savings per month 5,760.62 pesos
% Saved 8.23
SAVINGS CONSUMPTION BILLS TO PAY

in a yr PHP 69,127.47 PHP 840,000.00 PHP 770,872.53
in 3 yrs PHP 207,382.40 PHP 2,520,000.00 PHP 2,312,617.60
in 5 yrs PHP 345,637.33 PHP 4,200,000.00 PHP 3,854,362.67

Design of 3storey Public School Building With Rainwater Harvesting System in Maybunga Pasig PDF

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Design of 3storey Public School Building With Rainwater Harvesting System in Maybunga Pasig PDF

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Design of T hree Storey Public School Building

with Rainwater Harvesting System

in Maybunga, Pasig City

San Pedro, Robin S.

Submitted to the School of Civil, Environmental and Geological

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

For the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering

Mapua Institute of T echnology

CHAPTER 1: Introduction ...............................................................................................1

2.3.2 Brief Discussion of Specific Significant Impacts on the Physical and

2.4.5 Institutional Responsibilities and Agreements ...........................................19

CHAPTER 3: The Research Component .....................................................................20

4.3.1 Soil Investigation.45

LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES

Table 1: DepEd report on Budget, Shortages, Target and Deficit (2010) 2

Table 2: Summary Matrix of Predicted Environmental Issues/Impacts and

their Level of Significance at Various Stages of Development 14

Table 3: Summary Matrix of Proposed Mitigation and Enhancement

Measures, Estimated Cost and Responsibilities 17

Table 4: Monitoring Plan 18

Table 5: Properties of Channel Section (C 3x5) for Purlins 37

Table 6: Schedule of Beams 39

Table 7; Schedule of Columns 42

Table 8: Schedule of Slabs 44

Table 9: Concrete Works For Beams 49

Table 10: Summary For Beams 49

Table 11: Concrete Works For Columns 49

Table 11.1: Columns At Ground 49

Table 11.2: At 2FLR 49

Table 11.3: At 3FLR 50

Table 11.4: Summary For Columns 50

Table 12: Concrete Works For Slabs 50

Table 13: Reinforcements For Beams 50

Table 13.1: Beam Reinforcements Per Level 50

Table 14: Reinforcement For Columns 51

Table 15: Reinforcement For Slabs 51

Table 16: Summary Of Cost 52

Table 17: Cost - Benefit Analysis 53

Table 18: Detailed Estimated Duration of Each Work Classification

for the Project 54

Table 19: Manpower Requirement 54

Table 20 Equipment Requirement 55

Table 21: Project Schedule 56

Figure 1: This show the exact location of site in satellite view 8

Figure 3: Methodology Flow Chart 24

Figure 4: Perspective View 27

Figure 5: Ground & 3rd Floor Plan 28

Figure 6: 2nd Floor Plan 29

Figure 7: Front Elevation 30

Figure 8: Rear Elevation 31

Figure 9: Right Side Elevation 32

Figure 10: Left Side Elevation 32

Figure 11: Typical Framing Plan 33

Figure 12: Roof Framing Plan 34

Figure 13: Truss Details 35

Figure 14: Design of Sagrod and Tierod 37

Figure 15: Truss Top Chords 38

Figure 16: Truss Bottom Chords 38

Figure 17: Truss Web Members 38

Figure 18: Typical Beam Details 41

Figure 19: Typical Column Details 43

Figure 20: Typical Beam-Column Framing Plan 44

Figure 21: Elevation of Mat Foundation 45