Design Report Rev 02

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM
FOR
EXTENSION OF AMIRI DIWAN PROJECT

AT
DOHA QATAR
02 19-July-17 For Approval AA GD
01 05-June-17 For Approval MN GD
00 16-May-17 For Approval MN GD
REV DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED VERIFIED APPROVED

Page 1 of 15
Doc. Ref.: ACC/EAD/DR/SH Rev 02
Do Not Duplicate, Controlled Copy if Stamped in Red.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT 3
3. DESCRIPTION OF THE SHORING SYSTEM 3
4. SUBSURFACE PROFILE 4
5. DESIGN REFERENCES 4
6. DESIGN PARAMETERS 5
6.1 Shoring Piles 5
6.2 Capping Beams 6
6.3 Steel Strut 6
7. ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM 7
7.1 Section 1 7
7.2 Section 2a 9
7.3 Section 2b 12
7.4 Section 3 13
8. SUMMARY OF SHORING SYSTEM 14
9. MONITORING OF SHORING SYSTEM 14
ANNEXURES
SUBSURFACE PROFILE FOR DESIGN ANNEXURE 1
SHORING KEY PLAN & SHORING SECTIONS ANNEXURE 2
SURCHARGE LOAD CALCULATIONS ANNEXURE 3
PLAXIS ANALYSIS RESULTS ANNEXURE 4
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM ANNEXURE 5

Page 2 of 15
1. INTRODUCTION
The project is called as extension of Amiri Diwan is located at Doha Qatar. The extension
includes the construction of new offices at the North side of the existing building, facing
towards the Corniche road.
Civil work of the project is awarded to Contraco and Ammico is involved in the project as a
shoring sub-contractor.
2. PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT
This document is a revision to previously submitted design of shoring system for the
Extension of Amiri Diwan Project (ACC/EAD/DR/SH Rev01). This revision is prepared
based on the following revised details;
Excavation levels at Section 1 and section 2 have been changed from +3.0m QNHD and
+4.0m QNHD to +5.45m QNHD with reference to provided revised architectural
drawings.
Micro pile shoring system has been introduced at Section 2a, as standard piling rigs
cannot be positioned due to existing adjacent building.
Top level of shoring piles at section 3 has been revised from +11.00m QNHD to +8.40m
QNHD.
The in-situ rock level has been considered 5.0m below existing ground based on the pile
boring record.
The shoring system provided at section 1 and section 2b are stable without any internal
support (cantilever) as the retain height is reduced. Therefore, struts at these sections
are eliminated.
As per above-mentioned revisions, the shoring sections has been re-analyzed and
presented in this document.
3. DESCRIPTION OF THE SHORING SYSTEM
The site shall be excavated down below the existing ground for the construction of new
office buildings. To retain the deep excavation in loose strata, adequate shoring system is

Page 3 of 15
required. Based on the depth of loose strata and adjacent structure following types of
shoring systems have been designed at different sections;
Section 1: 600@650mm diameter contiguous pile (cantilever) with capping beam.

Section 2a: 300@350mm diameter micro pile with bracing / capping beam and struts.
Section 2b: 600@650mm diameter contiguous pile (cantilever) with capping beam.
Section 3: 900@950mm diameter contiguous pile (cantilever) with capping beam.
4. SUBSURFACE PROFILE
Reference has been made to Geotechnical Investigation Report for Extension of Amiri
Diwan Project, Report No: S17000102 Rev 0 dated April 2017 by ACES. As per the
investigation report, one borehole has been drilled at an area where existing ground level is
around at +6.0m QNHD. The rock level at the borehole location is at -0.5m QNHD (6.5m
below ground level) as per the geotechnical investigation report. However, the existing
ground is +11.0m QNHD at the shoring pile location and during the installation of piles at
section 1, 2b and 3 (based on Rev. 01 of design report), if have been recorded that in-situ
rock level at shoring area is at +6.0m QNHD (5.0m bgl). Therefore, the thickness of fill
material near the proposed shoring area is 5.0m but to be on conservative side 7.0m is
considered in the analysis of shoring system.
The soil/rock parameters used for the design of shoring system are given below;
Backfill Materials (11.0 to +4.0m QNHD)
Bulk Unit Weight = 18.0 kN/m3
Friction Angle = 30
E = 15.32MPa
Cohesion = 0.0 kPa
Simsima Limestone (+4.0 m to END)

Bulk Unit Weight = 21.0 kN/m3
Friction Angle = 30
E = 200.0 MPa
Cohesion = 60.0 kPa
As per the soil investigation report, the ground water was found at depths of -2.0m QNHD.
The subsurface profile is attached herewith in Annexure-1.
5. DESIGN REFERENCES
CODES
CIRIA C580 Embedded Retaining Walls Guidance for Economic Design
BS 8004: 1986 Code of Practice for Foundations
BS 8110-1: 1997 Code of Practice for Design & Construction
BS5950 - Part 1 (2000) Steelwork
ICE Specification for Piling and Embedded Retaining Walls
QCS 2014
Project Specification
SOFTWARE
PLAXIS 2D AE Version 2015
PLAXIS 3D AE Version 2015
ACECOMS GEAR V3

Page 4 of 15
LOADS
Soil Loads
Surcharge Loads
MATERIAL
C40 grade concrete (non-durable) for all shoring elements
C30 grout for micro pile shoring element
500 grade black deformed reinforcing bars for all shoring elements
S275 grade steel for the strut
6. DESIGN PARAMETERS
Shoring system had been analyzed and designed to resist the lateral forces generated by
soil/rock and surcharge loads for the retaining height. The shoring details for the considered
sections are available at Annexure 2 and summary is given below;
6.1 Shoring Piles
Section 1
This section is situated near the existing wall of courtyard. Site will be excavated for the
installation of lift which will provide the access in between new offices and existing Amiri
Diwan. Initially, this section was designed for 8.0m retain height but later on it is revised as
5.55m based on final architectural and structural drawings. The designed shoring for this
section is 600mm diameter contiguous piles (cantilever) with spacing of 650mm c/c. Overall
shoring piles will form a circle shape with an opening at access tunnel location. A capping
beam will be constructed at the top of piles. The capping beam at this section will not have
any connection with the capping beam of section 2.
Section 2
This section is located along the access tunnel. Initially, this section was designed for 7.0m
retain height but later on it is revised as 5.55m based on final architectural and structural
drawings. This portion has been divided into two sections.
Section 2a is still within the vicinity of surcharge load of existing Amiri Diwan building. The
300mm diameter micro pile having 350mm c/c spacing with capping / bracing beam and
strut is proposed due to the space restriction (as standard piling rig cannot fit in) and the
existing footing of the building.
Section 2b is considerably away from the existing Amiri Diwan building therefore, 20kPa of
surcharge is considered. The 600mm diameter contiguous piles (cantilever) having 650mm
c/c spacing with a capping beam is considered in this section. The capping beam between
section 2a and 2b will not be connected with each other.
Section 3
This section is placed along the existing plant boxes. The top of plant boxes was +11.0m
QNHD and height of the plant boxes were 2.6m. Once the plant boxes were removed,
shoring top level is reduced to +8.40m QNHD since there is an existing RC wall in between
+11.0m QNHD and +8.4m QNHD. The designed shoring system is cantilever 900mm
diameter contiguous piles.
Based on the above description, following table shows the shoring details;

Page 5 of 15
Table 1: Shoring Details
Ground Shoring Top Exc. Retain Shoring Toe
Level Level Level Height Level Surcharge
Sec.
(kPa)
(QNHD) (QNHD) (QNHD) (m) (QNHD)
1 +11.00 +11.00 +5.45 5.55 -3.00 68.0
2a +11.00 +11.00 +5.45 5.55 -1.00 68.0
2b +11.00 +11.00 +5.45 5.55 -1.00 20.0
3 +11.00 +8.40 +4.00 4.40 -3.60 66.8
Detailed calculations of surcharge load for each section is available at Annexure 3.
The structural properties of the proposed shoring system are as follows;
Table 2: Shoring System Properties

Effective Moment of Elastic
Shoring Detail
Area Inertia Modulus
Sec. Profile/System
Dia. Spacing
(m2/m) (m4/m) (kPa)
(m) (m)
1 Contiguous Pile 0.60 0.65 0.435 9.78 x10-3 3.30x107
2a Micro Pile 0.30 0.35 0.202 1.14 x10-3 3.10x107
2b Contiguous Pile 0.60 0.65 0.435 9.78 x10-3 3.30x107
3 Contiguous Pile 0.90 0.95 0.669 3.39 x10-2 3.30x107
It is to be noted that existing ground water level is lower than the excavation level and
shoring system has been designed without considering the water force. Therefore, during
the shoring and civil works, it must be ensured no water force shall come to the shoring
system. Other parameters considered for the analysis are as follows;
Soil / wall interface =0.67

Rock / wall interface =0.75
6.2 Capping Beams
The Section 1 and Section 2a shall be supported by capping / bracing beam at the pile top.
These beams shall be reinforced concrete and the parameters used for the modeling of
bracing / capping beam are available at the table given below;
Table 3: Bracing / Capping Beam Properties

Width Height Concrete Grade
Section Beam Type
(mm) (mm) (MPa)
1 Capping 600 750 40.0
2a Capping / Bracing 400 600 40.0
6.3 Steel Strut
One layer of steel strut will be installed at Section 2a. Following parameters have been
used in the modeling;

Page 6 of 15
Table 4: Strut Properties
Level Profile Type Steel Grade
Section
(QNHD) (mm) (MPa)
2a +10.70 305 x 305 x 97 275
7. ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM
7.1 Section 1
The shoring system is analyzed using geotechnical software Plaxis 3D v2015. The design
sequences are as follows;
Simulation of Existing Condition of site
Application of Surcharge Load
Activation of Shoring Piles

Page 7 of 15
Excavation of capping beam
Activation of Capping Beam
Excavation down to formation level
Excavation for Pit

Page 8 of 15
The analysis results of shoring system at section 1 are available at Annexure 4 and
summary of results is presented in the following table.
Table 5: Summary of Results for Contiguous Pile Analysis

Maximum Bending Maximum Shear Horizontal Wall Movement
Section Moment Force @ Shoring
(kNm) (kN) (mm)
1 148.9 220.9 6.97
Table 6: Summary of Results for Capping Beam

Sides Top
Bending Axial Force
Section Bending Moment Shear Force Shear Force
Moment (kN)
(kNm) (kN) (kN)
(kNm)
1 90.46 76.38 79.37 156.4 250.0
Structural Design of Pile

During the structural calculations software outputs (shear & moments) are factorized with
1.5 to reach the Ultimate Limit State on the structural failure. Reinforcement for shoring
piles are designed for (a) bending moments or stresses (b) shear forces manually as per
BS 8110 charts. Designed outputs (steel reinforcement) for shoring piles are rechecked by
using Acecom Gear Software. The detailed calculations for this section are attached under
Annexure 5 and summary of results is presented in the following table.
Table 7: Summary of Design of Shoring System at Section 1
Required Provided
Required Provided
Pile Pile Required Provided
Description Main Main
Length Length Shear Steel Shear Steel
Steel Steel
(m) (m)
T10@150mm T10@150mm
14.00 14.00 600@650 7T20 9T20
c/c c/c
As the shoring piles of this section are already under construction based on Revision 1 of
design report, the provided pile details (length, rebar, etc.) are safe.
Analysis & Design of Capping Beam

The maximum forces of the beam have been obtained from the output of geotechnical
analysis (Plaxis 3D) of shoring system. These forces have been used to design the capping
beam. The complete design calculation is attached under Annexure 5 and summary of
results is presented in the following table.
Table 8: Capping Beam Design Summary
Max. Bending Max. Shear
Main Rebar Shear
Sec. Beam Type Moment Force
Rebar
(kN) (kN) All Sides
1 Capping Beam 90.46 156.4 4T16 T10@200
7.2 Section 2a
The shoring system is analyzed using geotechnical software Plaxis 3D v2015. The design
sequences are as follows;

Page 9 of 15
Initial Stage
Application of Surcharge Pressure
Activation of Shoring Piles
Excavation up to Strut level

Page 10 of 15
Activation of Bracing Beam and Strut
Excavation up to Final Formation Level
The results of shoring system analyzed through Plaxis 3D software is available at Annexure
4 and summary of results of micro pile, bracing beam and strut is presented in the following
table.
Table 9: Summary of Results for Micro Pile
Max. Bending Moment Max. Shear Force Deflection

Section
(kNm) (kN) (mm)
2a 56.66 100.7 16.79
Table 10: Summary of Results for Bracing Beam / Capping Beam

Sides Top
Section Bending Moment Shear Force Bending Moment Shear Force

(kNm) (kN) (kNm) (kN)
2a 27.18 81.61 50.52 91.70
Table 11: Summary of Results for Struts

Maximum Strut Force Designed Strut Force
Section
(kN) (kN)
73.32
2a 106.8 106.8
52.31

Page 11 of 15
Table 12: Summary of Design of Shoring System at Section 2a

Sec. Pile Length (m) Description Main Steel Shear Steel
2a 12.00 300 @ 350 4 T 32 T8@100mm c/c
Analysis & Design of Bracing Beams

The maximum forces of the beam have been obtained from the output of geotechnical
analysis (performed by Plaxis) of shoring system. These forces have been used to design
the bracing beam. The complete design calculation is attached under Annexure 5 and
summary of results is presented in the following table.
Table 13: Summary of Design of Shoring System

Max. Bending Max. Shear
Main Rebar Shear
Sec. Beam Type Moment Force
Rebar
(kN) (kN) All Sides
4T16 (EVF)
2a Bracing Beam 50.52 91.70 T10@200
1T25 (EHF)
EVF = Each vertical face, EHF = Each horizontal face
Analysis & Design of Strut at Capping / Bracing Beam

The strut design is based on the maximum axial load obtained from the Plaxis software.
The complete calculation of strut is available at Annexure 5 and summary of results is
presented in the following table.
Table 14: Summary of Strut Design
Max. Axial Load

Shoring Section Level (QNHD) Strut Type
(kN)
2a +10.700 106.8 UC 305 x 305 x 97
7.3 Section 2b
Analysis results of shoring system at Section 2b analyzed by Plaxis 2D software is

available at Annexure 4 and summary of results is presented in the following table.

Maximum Bending Maximum Shear Horizontal Wall Movement
Section Moment Force @ Shoring
(kNm/m) (kN/m) (mm)
2b 222.7 107.7 12.71

Page 12 of 15
Table 16: Summary of Design of Shoring System at Section 2b

Required Provided
Required Provided
Steel Steel
(m) (m)
T10@150mm T10@150mm
12.00 14.0 600@650 7T20 10T20
c/c c/c
design report, the provided pile details (length, rebar, etc.) are safe.

Each shoring pile is designed individually at Section 2b to take the all types of loads (i.e.
soil, and surcharge etc.). Thus, there is no structural requirement for the capping beam
except to homogenize the deformation of different shoring pile. Hence, a capping beam of
nominal size to be installed.
Size of the capping beam is 600 x 750mm. The complete design of capping beam is
available under Annexure 5 and summary of results are presented in the following table.

Capping
Shoring Main Rebar Shear
Beam Size
Section Rebar
(mm x mm) (SS) (ES) (TS) (BS)
2b 600 x 750 4T16 4T16 4T16 4T16 T10@200
7.4 Section 3
Analysis results of shoring system at section 3 analyzed by Plaxis 2D software are

available at Annexure 4 and summary of results is presented in the following table.

Maximum Maximum Horizontal Wall Movement @
Section Bending Moment Shear Force Shoring
(kNm/m) (kN/m) (mm)
3 281.5 133.4 6.58


Page 13 of 15
Table 19: Summary of Design of Shoring System at Section 3
Required Provided
Required Provided
Steel Steel
(m) (m)
7T32
(13.4m) T12@150mm T16@250mm
12.00 13.40 900@950 6T32
7T32 c/c c/c
(6m)
design report, provided pile details (length, rebar, etc.) are safe.

Each shoring pile is designed individually at Section 3 to take the all types of loads (i.e. soil,
and surcharge etc.). Thus, there is no structural requirement for the capping beam except
to homogenize the deformation of different shoring pile. Hence, a capping beam of nominal
size to be installed.
Size of the capping beam is 900 x 600mm. The complete design of capping beam is
available under Annexure 5 and summary of results are presented in the following table.

Capping
Shoring Main Rebar Shear
Beam Size
Section Rebar
(mm x mm) (SS) (ES) (TS) (BS)
3 900 x 600 4T20 4T20 4T20 4T20 T10@200
8. SUMMARY OF SHORING SYSTEM
Pile Capping /
Sec. Length Description Main Steel Shear Steel Bracing Strut
(m) Beam
1 14.00 600@650 9T20 T10@150mm c/c 600 x 750 -
UC
2a 12.00 300@350 4T32 T8@100mm c/c 400 x 600
305 x 305 x 97
2b 14.00 600@650 10T20 T10@150mm c/c 600 x 750 -
7T32 (13.4m)
3 13.40 900@950 T16@250mm c/c 900 x 600 -
7T32 (6.0m)
9. MONITORING OF SHORING SYSTEM
In order to ensure that the behavior of shoring system during and after excavation down to
formation level is in line with the analysis/design of the shoring, proper monitoring of the
lateral movement shall be undertaken.
The monitoring of shoring wall will be performed with total station by survey readings from
targets mounted on the shoring wall.
A survey target shall be consisted of a reflective target with precision cross hairs that give
accurate readings in three dimensions. Conventional total stations will be used to take
readings. An individual method statement shall be submitted in due course.

Page 14 of 15
ANNEXURE - 1
SUBSURFACE PROFILE FOR DESIGN

Annexure 1
EXTENSION OF AMIRI DIWAN BUILDING
Drawing Title: SOIL PROFILE
Drawing No.: ----
Status: ---- Date: 05-07-2017
Rev: R1 Drawn By: IJ
Scale: N.T.S Checked By: GD

ANNEXURE - 2
SHORING KEY PLAN & CROSS-SECTION

Annexure 2
KEY PLAN:
P-1 Ground Level Ground Level Ground Level Ground Level

Existing Min 70cm +11.0m QNHD Existing Variable +11.0m QNHD +11.0m QNHD +11.0m QNHD
P-2
Amiri Diwan Amiri Diwan THIS AREA
Building Building
P-3
Capping / Bracing Beam
No need for these piles Capping Beam
Capping / Bracing Beam
UC (305x305x97) (600x750mm)
P-4 (400x600mm)
as per site conditions (600x750mm)
P-5 Existing RC Wall
P-6
P-7
0.10
Excavation Level
+4.0m QNHD
P-8 Ground Level
+8.40m QNHD
Basement Wall
P-9 Outer Line
Capping Beam
P-10 (900x600mm)
SOIL SIDE EXCAVATION SIDE
P-11
P-55
0.650
P-12 Basement Wall

Outer Line
P-13
P-56 P-14
0.675
GENERAL NOTES:
P-15
SOIL SIDE EXCAVATION SIDE 1. The drawing is based on the site survey was undertaken by surteqa surveys on
P-57 P-16 Excavation Level
+5.45m QNHD
Excavation Level
+5.45m QNHD
CONTIGUOUS PILES
600mm@ 650mmC/C
Excavation Level
+5.45m QNHD
December 2016.
2. All dimensions, coordinates and elevations are in meters unless otherwise noted.
0.675
CONTIGUOUS PILES
0.050
P-17 900mm@ 950mmC/C 3. All coordinates are related to qatar national datum '95 (qnd '95). All elevations
0.10
are related to (QNHD).
P-18
P-58 3 3 CONTIGUOUS PILES MICRO PILES
4. C40 grade concrete for 600mm & 900mm dia. shoring elements (non-durable).
P-19 600mm@ 650mmC/C 300mm@ 350mmC/C 5. C30 grade grout for 300mm dia. micro piles (non-durable).
6. B500 grade reinforcing steel for all shoring elements (black deformed).
P-20 Excavation Level
+4.0m QNHD
7. The connection detail of steel strut and wailer beam will be provided with another
MP-1 shop drawing.
Capping Beam
P-21
MP-2
l
P-22
al
UC (305x305x97)
4
W
P-
ng
MP-3 M P-23
ni
ai
et
R
P-24
g
tin
MP-5
is
P-25
Ex
MP-6 P-26
(Sec. 2a)
P-27
MP-7
CONTIGUOUS PILES
P-28
MP-8 LEGENDS:
900mm@950C/C
Pile are removed due to

P-29
existing deep concrete wall 600mm Pile Type "A"
2a MP-9 2a P-30
ll MP-10 300mm Pile Type "B"

a P-31
W
ng 600mm Pile Type "C"
i ni MP P-32
a
et MP-12 -11
R P-33
g 900mm Pile Type "D"
tin
Toe Level
is -1.0m QNHD
Ex MP-13 P-34
0.30
P-35
Basement Wall SECTION -2a DOCUMENT REVIEW STATUS:
CONTIGUOUS PILES
Outer Line
UC (305x305x97)
600mm@650C/C P-36
STATUS A: APPROVED
WITH 1 ROW OF STRUT P-37 Toe Level
-3.0m QNHD STATUS B: APPROVED WITH COMMENTS
66
P-38
P-
0.60 STATUS C: NOT APPROVED REJECTED

7
Toe Level
P-6
P- P-39 SECTION -1a -3.0m QNHD

40 STATUS D: COMMENTED AND RESUBMIT
P-
41 0.60
Existing P-
P- 42 Basement Wall
Retaining Wall 43
3
P- Outer Line SECTION -2b
P- 44 Toe Level 2 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL 04-07-2017 RA A.A G.D X.X.
45 -5.0m QNHD
b)
P-
P-180
P-179
P-178
P-177
P-176
P-175
P-174
P-171
P-173
P-172
P-170
P-169
P-168
P-167
D
P-166
P-165
P-164
P-161
P-163
.2
P- 46
P-159
P-158
P-155
P-154
P-156
P-157
P-160
P-162
ISSUED FOR APPROVAL 13-06-2017 RA G.D X.X. X.X.
H
5. 0.90 1
ec
P- 47
N
60
(S
2b
Q
P- 48 0 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL 30-05-2017 RA G.D X.X. X.X.

m
49 P-181
.0
n HD
P-
ve
1
50
tio N
DESCRIPTION DATE DWN CHKD APPD APPD

Le
REV.
+1
P-
va Q
P-182
P- 51 P-
ca 5m
P- 52 P- 153 Contiguous Pile

Capping Beam Excavation Side
3
CLIENT:
Ex 5.4
15
P- 53 P-183
2b
P- CONTIGUOUS PILES 600mm @ 650mm c/c

15 2
+
54 P-
P- 1
P- 55 P-
15 900mm@950C/C P-184
14 0
P- 56 P- 9
2b
57 1 48 P-185
P- Capping Beam
)
a) 14
97
P-
.2 7
5x
c P- 14 P-186
Se 6
30
( P- 145
+11.0m QNHD
5x
N= 393169.896
P- 144 P-187
2b
0
E= 231353.290 14 CONSULTANT:
(3
P- 3
b)
1
C
.2
P- 42 P-188
U
2a
ec
P- 141
mm
(S
CONTIGUOUS PILES
2a P- 140 P-189
900mm@950C/C
13 650m
700
4. P- 9 m
700m
83 P- 138 CONTIGUOUS PILES P-190
2a 13 600mm
P-70
P-69
P-71
P-68
7
P-72
Capping Beam
P-67
600mm@650C/C
P-73
m
4
P-66
Excavation Level
P-191
P-7
P-7
WITH 1 ROW OF STRUT
+4.0m QNHD
2a
P- 7
5.
5
80
P- 8
76
P-192
7
P-
P- Soil Side Existing Wall

LEAD ARCHITECT:
7
N= 393165.061 P- 79 P-193
8
P- 0
Capping Beam
E= 231348.335 81 Existing
a)
P-8 P-194 Modulation Plan for Section - 1

.2
2 Retaining Wall UNii Engineering Consultancy

ec
P-8
3
D
1a
(S
+5.45m QNHD P-127 P-195 UAE-QATAR-KSA

H
P-84
N
Excavation Level P.O.Box : 11490 - Doha, Qatar

P-126
Q
P-85 P-196 Tel:+974 4414 6652, Fax:+974 4414 6653, Qatar:+974 6 6499010
0m
1a P-125
P-86
1.
P-124 Excavation Side Contiguous Pile

+1
P-87 P-197
P-123 600mm @ 650mm c/c
P-88 P-122 Basement Wall MAIN CONTRACTOR:
100mm
7 P-198
400mm
P-89 R 7.0
6
P-121 UC (305x305x97) Basement Wall Outer Line Capping Beam
P-90 P-12 P-199 Outer Line
1 0 N= 393158.359
P-9
2
P-1
P-1 19
E= 231365.176 Contraco W.L.L
P-9 18 P-200
3
P-9 4
Construction Company
MP-22
P-
MP-17
MP-18
P- 171
9 Address: Haloul st, Al Mamoura, Doha, Qatar
P- 5 P- 116 P-201
2a
9
P- 11
0.350 Phone:+974 4410 9333
96
N= 393157.964 5 ON HOLD
P- 113
P-202
P-
P- 7
P- 12
11
9
E= 231348.421
P-
P- 11
P- 8
0.050 0.640 0.650

4
9
99
P-1 0
00
0.340
P-1
01
0.050 P-203
P-10
2
P-1
P-103
P-10
600mm 650mm SHORING SUB-CONTRACTOR:

P-104
P-107
P-105
P-106
P-10
P-1
0.340 Soil Side

1
P-
MP-21
MP-19
MP-20
9
12 P-204
8
7 Ammico Contracting Co. W.L.L.

M
MP
P-
P-205 Modulation Plan for Section - 2b

P-
16
P.O. BOX :14330

-23
0.133
12
MP-15
MP-14
MP-24
MP-25
MP-26
MP-27
MP-28
MP-30
MP-29
DOHA - QATAR
P-138
P-140
P-206
P-139
P-137
6 TEL. +974 4886581 FAX. +974 4886507

N= 393153.152 P-207
N= 393153.003 E= 231360.644
Ex
l
al
E= 231353.534
Excavation Side PROJECT NAME:
is
W
P-208
t
in
ng
Existing Wall
g
3 3 Contiguous Pile
2a
100mm
ni
Capping Beam
ai
et
0.640 P-209 Basement Wall 900mm @ 950mm c/c

et

in
CONTIGUOUS PILES Outer Line

R
in
g
g
tin
600mm@650C/C P-210
DOHA, QATAR
W
is
al
Ex
(Sec. 2a)
l
550mm
P-211
+11.0m QNHD P-212 TITLE:

P-213
SHORING PILES LAYOUT PLAN
P-214
MODULATION PLAN & SHORING PILES SECTION
P-215
900mm 950mm Soil Side
P-216 THIS IS A CAD DRAWING AND MUST NOT BE ALTERED MANUALLY
Modulation Plan for Section - 3
P-217 DRAWING NUMBER: SCALE NTS ORIG. DWG SIZE: A1 REV.
A17-08-SH-01 Sht. Con't. on 001 To 002 2

ANNEXURE - 3
SURCHARGE CALCULATION

Annexure 3
Sheet 1 of 1
Prepared by: M N
Checked by: G D
Date 5-Jul-17
Surcharge Calculations Reference
Ref. 1: CIRIA C580
Ref. 2: Geotechnical Investigation Report
Unit weight of concrete = 25 kN/m3
Weight of one Intermediate Storey
RCC Slab weight (a) = 375 kg/m2
Floor Finish (b) = 150
Total weight of slab (a+b) = 525 kg/m2
Considering 1/3rd weight of slab is the weight of frame elements
Weight of frame elements (c=(a+b)/3) = 175 kg/m2
Immoveable partition load (d) = 200 kg/m2
Total dead load (f = a+b+c+d) = 900 kg/m2
Live load for residential building (e) = 200 kg/m2
Total weight of one storey (e+f) = 1,100 kg/m2
= 11.0 kg/m2
Using weight of one floor = 14.0 kg/m2
a) Surcharge for (G+2+R) - Section 1

Raft thickness = 0.50 m
Thickness of top slab considered = 0.3 m
No of floors = 3.0
Total weight = 3*14+(0.5+0.3)*25
= 62.0 kN/m2
Surcharge used for analysis = 68.0 kN/m2
b) Surcharge for Section 2a = 68.0 kN/m2

c) Surcharge for Section 2b = 20.0 kN/m2 Ref. 1
d) Surcharge for Section 3
Note: This section is adjacent to plant boxes which has a height of 2.6m but ground adjacent to
these plant boxes +8.40m QNHD. Surcharge load of top 2.6m has been used in the analysis of
shoring system.
Construction / traffic surcharge = 20.0 kN/m2 Ref. 1

Heigh of plnt boxes = 2.6 m
Unit weight of top soil, = 18.0 kN/m3 Ref. 2
Surcharge load of the top soil = 2.6 x 18
= 46.8 kN/m2
Total surcharge = 20 + 46.8
= 66.8 kN/m2
P.O. Box 14330, Doha - Qatar Tel: +974 4488 6531 Fax: +974 4488 6507 email : qatar@ammico.biz
ANNEXURE - 4
PLAXIS ANALYSIS RESULTS

Annexure 4
SECTION 1

Annexure 4
Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00
Total displacements uy (scaled up 200 times)
Maximum value = 6.976*10-3 m (Element 837 at Node 31817)
Minimum value = -6.965*10-3 m (Element 335 at Node 30789)
Project description Date
Extension of Amiri Diwan Building 7/18/2017

Project filename Step User name
Section 1 600 @ 650 PIT 37

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00
Bending moments M2 (scaled up 5.00*10-3 times)
Maximum value = 148.9 kN m (Element 230 at Node 30574)

Minimum value = -139.9 kN m (Element 842 at Node 31827)

Section 1 600 @ 650 PIT 37

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00
Shear forces Q13 (scaled up 5.00*10-3 times)
Maximum value = 220.9 kN (Element 881 at Node 31907)

Minimum value = -108.0 kN (Element 1158 at Node 32475)

Section 1 600 @ 650 PIT 37

SECTION 2a

Annexure 4
Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00
Total displacements uy (scaled up 50.0 times)
Minimum value = -0.01679 m (Element 105 at Node 8810)

Section 2a 300 @ 350 3 87

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00
Bending moments M2 (scaled up 0.0200 times)


Section 2a 300 @ 350 3 87

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00
Shear forces Q13 (scaled up 5.00*10-3 times)


Section 2a 300 @ 350 3 87

SECTION 2b

Annexure 4
Output Version 2016.1.21797.15047
-8.00 0.00 8.00 16.00 24.00 32.00 40.00 48.00 56.00 64.00 72.00 80.00 88.00 96.00 [m]
0.12
16.00
8.00
0.1
0.00
0.08
-8.00
0.06
-16.00
-24.00
0.04
-32.00
0.02
-40.00
Total displacements ux (scaled up 500 times)
Maximum value = 0.01271 m (Element 1 at Node 141)

Minimum value = 1.152*10-3 m (Element 12 at Node 7921)
Amiri Diwan Extension 7/18/2017

600 @ 650 Sec 2b 120 Ammico Contracting Co. W.L.L.

Output Version 2016.1.21797.15047
-8.00 0.00 8.00 16.00 24.00 32.00 40.00 48.00 56.00 64.00 72.00 80.00 88.00 96.00 [kN m/m]
16.00
2800
8.00
2400
0.00
2000
-8.00
1600
-16.00
1200
-24.00
800
-32.00
400
-40.00
Bending moments M (scaled up 0.0200 times)

Maximum value = 10.87 kN m/m (Element 16 at Node 9148)
Minimum value = -222.7 kN m/m


Output Version 2016.1.21797.15047
-8.00 0.00 8.00 16.00 24.00 32.00 40.00 48.00 56.00 64.00 72.00 80.00 88.00 96.00 [kN/m]
16.00
2800
8.00
2400
0.00
2000
-8.00
1600
-16.00
1200
-24.00
800
-32.00
400
-40.00
Shear forces Q (scaled up 0.0200 times)

Maximum value = 95.22 kN/m (Element 12 at Node 7283)
Minimum value = -107.7 kN/m


SECTION 3

Annexure 4
Output Version 2015.2.19890.13737
8.00 16.00 24.00 32.00 40.00 48.00 56.00 64.00 72.00 80.00 [*10-3 m]
80
8.00
70
0.00
60
50
-8.00
40
-16.00
30
20
-24.00
10
-32.00
0
Total displacements ux (scaled up 500 times)

Minimum value = 1.492*10-3 m (Element 5 at Node 1549)

900 @ 950 Sec 3 21 Ammico Contracting Co. W.L.L.

Output Version 2015.2.19890.13737
8.00 16.00 24.00 32.00 40.00 48.00 56.00 64.00 72.00 80.00 [kN m/m]
2200
2000
8.00
1800
1600
0.00
1400
-8.00 1200
1000
-16.00
800
600
-24.00
400
200
-32.00
0
Bending moments M (scaled up 0.0200 times)

Maximum value = 0.5011 kN m/m (Element 8 at Node 1927)
Minimum value = -281.5 kN m/m (Element 4 at Node 1324)


Output Version 2015.2.19890.13737
8.00 16.00 24.00 32.00 40.00 48.00 56.00 64.00 72.00 80.00 [kN/m]
2200
2000
8.00
1800
1600
0.00
1400
-8.00 1200
1000
-16.00
800
600
-24.00
400
200
-32.00
0
Shear forces Q (scaled up 0.0200 times)

Maximum value = 84.82 kN/m (Element 5 at Node 1548)
Minimum value = -133.4 kN/m (Element 3 at Node 1323)


ANNEXURE - 5
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

Annexure 5
SECTION 1
STRUCTURAL DESIGN

Annexure 5
Design of Shoring Pile

Annexure 5
Sheet 1 of 1
Prepared by: A A
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Design of Shoring Section 1 References
Ref:1- Plaxis Analysis Results
Ref:2- BS 4449
Ref:3- Acecom Gear 2003
Ref:4- Shear Reinforcement Calculation
Design Basis
Yield strength of steel, fy = 500 MPa Ref:2
Compressive strength of concrete, fcu = 40 MPa
Diameter of pile, D = 600 mm
Pile length, L = 14.00 m
Self-weight = 99.0 kN
Clear cover = 75.0 mm
Diameter of shear reinforcement = 10.0 mm
Diameter of main reinforcement = 20.0 mm
C/C Spacing of piless, s = 0.65 m
Load factor = 1.50
Steel reinforcement through out the shoring depth
Maximum Bending Moment Per Pile, Ms1 = 148.90 kN-m Ref:1

Factored Moment, Mu1 = 223.35 kN-m
Required Reinforcement at max. moment = 7T20 0.8% Ref:3
Provided Reinforcement = 9T20
Maximum Shear Force Per Pile , SF1 = 220.90 kN Ref:1

Factored Shear Force, SFu1 = 331.35 kN
Required Reinforcement at max. shear = T10@150mm c/c Ref:4
Note: Rebar details are available in drawing attached under Annexure 2
ACECOMS GEAR: RC Column Section Design Version: 3.0 (Rev. 0)
Project Information:
Project = Extension of Amiri Diwan Building
Title = Shoring Pile at Section 1 (600mm)
Client = Private Engineering Office
Organization = -
Engineer = Shaker
RC Column Section
Column C-1 : Sect0001 : Total
Column C-1 : Sect0001 : Load1
Material
Rebar Fy = 500.0 N/mm^2
Concrete fcu = 40.0 N/mm^2
Clear Cover = 75 mm Column Cross-section
Calculations
Designing Column Section:
Applied Load, P = 99.0 kN
Applied Moment, Mx = 223.4 kN
7/18/2017 (User: Jamal Nasir) 1

Applied Moment, My = 0.0 kN
Applied Resultant Moment, Mxy = 223.4 kN-m
Applied Moment Angle = 0.00
Solution found at minimum steel ratio
Rebars = 7-d 20 (Ast = 2,226 mm^2 , ratio = 0.78%)
Axial Compresion Capacity, Puo = 6,017.6 kN
Axial Tension Capacity, Put = -1,113.0 kN
Resultant Moment Capacity, Muxy = 232.6 kN-m
Concrete volume = 0.28 m^3
Main Steel weight = 17.29 Kg/m
Steel weight/ volume = 61.15 Kgm^3
Transverse Bars: Ties, d 6 @ 288 mm

Shear Reinforcement Design
Reinforced Concrete Circular Section
Project Name EXTENSION OF AMIRI DIWAN BUILDING

Detail CONTIGUOUS PILE SHORING - Sec 1
Shear Load (kN) 331.35 Concrete grade 40 Area of steel (mm2) 2827.4
Rebar no 9 Concrete Cover (mm) 75 Es (MPa) 200000.0
Main Bar dia (mm) 20 Moment (kNm) 223.35 Ec (Mpa) 26,587.0
Rebar Yield 500 Vertical load (kN) 98.96
D X r rs Apile sin Ashear d Be

2 2
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm ) (radian) (mm ) (mm) (mm)
600 142.56 300 203 282,743.34 0.431 0.445 216442.128 429.234 504.252
Neutral Axis (X) > Radius

X-r y A1 A2 Acomp Atens Ast* rebar ratio in
(mm) (mm) (degree) (mm2) (mm2) (mm2) (mm2) (mm2) tension zone (%)
-157.4367877 0.0 0.00 0.00 282,743.34 282,743.34 0.00 0 0.00%
Neutral Axis (X) < Radius

r-x y A1 A2 Atens Acomp Ast* rebar ratio in
2 2 2 2 2
(mm) (mm) (degree) (mm ) (mm ) (mm ) (mm ) (mm ) tension zone (%)
157.4367877 255.4 58.35 20,102.29 191,093.75 231,298.33 51,445.01 2313 1.07%
Vc Vh/m Vc' Vcd Vs conditions 1 conditions 2 conditions 3 actual spacing

(N/mm2) (<=1) (N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2) condition (mm)
0.646 0.89 0.833 0.97 1.531 0.49 1.37 5.00 3 150
Vs1 0.00 0 78.54

10
VS2 88.62 2 78.54
(no of links) (Shear reinfo dia)
Povided
Final 10 bars @ 150 mm spacing
Reference :
Clarke, J.L. and Birjandi, F.K. (2004). The behaviour of reinforced concrete circular sections in shear, The Structural Engineer, Vol.71, No.5, 73-81.
Design of Capping Beam

Annexure 5
Sheet 1 of 4
Prepared by: M N
EXTENSION OF AMIRI DIWAN
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Analysis & Design of Capping Beam Section 1 References
Ref:1- PLAXIS 3D ANALYSIS RESULTS
Ref:2- BS 8110-1:1997
Ref:3- ACECOM GEAR
Ref:4- SHEAR CALCULATION SHEETS
Analysis & Design Basis

Yield strength of steel, fy = 500 MPa
Width of beam, w = 600 mm
Depth of beam, D = 0.75 m
Effective depth in vertical direction, dv = 682 mm
Effective depth in horizontal direction, dh = 532 mm
Clear cover = 50 mm
Diameter of shear reinforcement = 10 mm
Diameter of main reinforcement = 16 mm
Analysis Results
Factor to convert applied forces to ultimate, f = 1.5 Ref:2
Max. moment on vertical face at shoring side = 90.46 kNm Ref:1
Ult. moment on vertical face at shoring side = 135.7 kNm
Max. moment on vertical face at excavation side = 71.55 kNm Ref:1
Ult. moment on vertical face at excavation side = 107.3 kNm
Max. moment on top face = 79.4 kNm Ref:1
Ult. moment on top face = 119.1 kNm
Max. moment on bottom face = 34.3 kNm Ref:1
Ult. moment on bottom face = 51.5 kNm
Max. shear on vertical face = 76.4 kNm Ref:1
Ult. shear on vertical face = 115 kNm
Max. shear on horizontal face = 156.4 kNm Ref:1
Ult. shear on horizontal face = 234.6 kNm
Maximum axial load, P = 250.0 kN
Ultimate axial load, Pu = 375.0 kN
Design Results
Main Rebar at vertical face on shoring side = 4 T 16 0.18 % (min rebar) Ref:2
Main rebar on vertical face at excavation side = 4 T 16 0.18 % (min rebar) Ref:2
Main rebar on top face of beam = 4 T 16 0.18 % (min rebar) Ref:2
Main rebar on bottom face of beam = 4 T 16 0.18 % (min rebar) Ref:2
Sheet 2 of 4
Prepared by: M N
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
References
Provided shear rebar at VF = 1nos T10@200mm stirrups Ref:4
Provided shear rebar at HF = 1nos T10@200mm stirrups Ref:4
Sheet 3 of 4
Prepared by: A A
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Shear Reinforcement for Shear Force at Vertical Face Reference
Maximum shear force = 76 kN

Factored shear force, Vu = 76.38x1.5
= 115 kN
Width of beam = 750 mm
Effective depth , d = 532 mm
Shear stirrups spacing = 200 mm
Applied shear stress in concrete, Vs = Vu/bd Ref. 2
= 114.57 x 10^3 /(750 x 532)

= 0.29 MPa
Main reinforcement %age = 0.18 %
/ /
100 400 1
Shear resistance of concrete for C25 = 0.79 Ref. 2
where
/ (1/3)
= (0.178721715404219)
= 0.56 < 3
< 3
/ = 400.0 = 0.93 < 1

>1
532.0
1 = 1/1.25 = 0.80
Shear resistance of concrete for C25 = 0.36 MPa

Shear resistance of concrete for C40, Vc = 0.36 x (40/25)^1/3
= 0.42
0.5Vc < Vs < Vc+ 0.4 Ref. 2
0.21 < 0.29 < 0.82

OK
Vc+ 0.4 < Vs < 0.8*(fcu)0.5
0.82 < 0.29 < 5.06
Required area of shear reinforcement, Asv 0.4 x Sv x bv /(0.87 x fy) Ref. 2
= 0.4 x 200 x 750 /(0.87 x 500)

2
= 137 mm
2
Area of d10 bar = 78.5 mm
No of legs = 2
2
Provided area of shear reinforcement, Asv = 2 x 78.5 mm
2
= 157.0 > 137 mm Ok
2 nos legs of T10@200 links shall be provided or
1nos T10@200mm stirrups
Sheet 4 of 4
Prepared by: A A
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Shear Reinforcement for Shear Force at Horizontal Face Reference
Maximum shear force = 156.4 kN

= 234.6 kN
= 234.6 x 10^3 /(600 x 682)

= 0.57 MPa
/ /
100 400 1
where
/ (1/3)
= (0.178721715404219)
= 0.56 < 3
< 3
/ = 400.0 = 0.88 < 1

>1
682.0
1 = 1/1.25 = 0.80

= 0.42
0.5Vc < Vs < Vc+ 0.4 Ref. 2
0.21 < 0.57 < 0.82

OK
Vc+ 0.4 < Vs < 0.8*(fcu)0.5
0.82 < 0.57 < 0.00
= 0.4 x 200 x 600 /(0.87 x )

2
= 110 mm
2
No of legs = 2
2
2
= 157.0 > 110 mm Ok
Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00


Section 1 600 @ 650 PIT 37

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00


Section 1 600 @ 650 PIT 37

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00
Shear forces Q12 (scaled up 0.0200 times)


Section 1 600 @ 650 PIT 37

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00


Section 1 600 @ 650 PIT 37

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00
Axial forces N (scaled up 5.00*10-3 times)


Section 1 600 @ 650 PIT 37

SECTION 2a
STRUCTURAL DESIGN

Annexure 5

Annexure 5
Sheet 1 of 1
Prepared by: A A
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Design of Shoring Section 2a References
Ref:2- BS 4449
Design Basis
Compressive strength of concrete, fcu = 30.0 MPa
Clear cover = 40 mm
Load factor = 1.50


Note: Rebar details are available in drawing attached under Annexure 2
Title = Shoring Pile at Section 2a (300mm)
Organization = -
Engineer = Shaker
RC Column Section
Material
Calculations

Solution found


Detail MICRO PILE SHORING - Sec 2a

(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm2) (radian) (mm2) (mm) (mm)
300 122.13 150 82 70,685.83 0.348 0.355 50681.624 202.203 250.647

2 2 2 2 2
-27.86765919 0.0 0.00 0.00 70,685.83 70,685.83 0.00 0 0.00%

27.86765919 147.4 79.29 2,053.69 39,547.49 43,654.87 27,030.97 1987 3.92%

0.997 0.53 1.092 1.16 2.980 0.58 1.56 4.38 3 100
Vs1 0.00 0 50.27

8
VS2 96.01 2 50.27
Povided
Reference :
Design of Bracing Beam

Annexure 5
Sheet 1 of 4
Prepared by: M N
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Analysis & Design of Bracing Beam (Capping) Section 2a References
Ref:1- PLAXIS 3D ANALYSIS RESULTS
Ref:2- BS 8110-1:1997
Ref:3- ACECOM GEAR
Ref:4- SHEAR CALCULATION SHEETS
Analysis & Design Basis

Yield strength of steel, fy = 500 MPa
Width of beam, w = 400 mm
Depth of beam, D = 0.60 m
Effective depth in vertical direction, dv = 527.5 mm
Effective depth in horizontal direction, dh = 327.5 mm
Clear cover = 50 mm
Analysis Results
Factor to convert applied forces to ultimate, f = 1.5 Ref:2
Max. moment on vertical face at shoring side = 23.55 kNm Ref:1
Ult. moment on vertical face at shoring side = 35.33 kNm
Max. moment on vertical face at excavation side = 27.18 kNm Ref:1
Ult. moment on vertical face at excavation side = 40.8 kNm
Max. moment on top face = 50.5 kNm Ref:1
Ult. moment on top face = 75.8 kNm
Max. moment on bottom face = 28.1 kNm Ref:1
Ult. moment on bottom face = 42.2 kNm
Max. shear on vertical face = 81.6 kNm Ref:1
Ult. shear on vertical face = 122 kNm
Max. shear on horizontal face = 91.7 kNm Ref:1
Ult. shear on horizontal face = 137.6 kNm
Maximum axial load, P = 25.8 kN
Ultimate axial load, Pu = 38.8 kN
Design Results
The required rebar is minimum (0.15%). Provided rebar quantities are as follows; Ref:2
Main Rebar at vertical face on shoring side = 4 T 16 0.34 %
Main rebar on vertical face at excavation side = 4 T 16 0.34 %
Main rebar on top face of beam = 1 T 25 0.20 %
Main rebar on bottom face of beam = 1 T 25 0.20 %
Sheet 2 of 4
Prepared by: M N
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
References
Provided shear rebar at VF = 1nos T10@200mm stirrups Ref:4
Provided shear rebar at HF = 1nos T10@200mm stirrups Ref:4
Sheet 3 of 4
Prepared by: A A
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Shear Reinforcement for Shear Force at Vertical Face Reference
Maximum shear force = 82 kN

= 122 kN
= 122.415 x 10^3 /(600 x 327.5)

= 0.62 MPa
/ /
100 400 1
where
/ (1/3)
= 0.69
(0.335103216382911)
= < 3
< 3
/ = 400.0 = 1.05 < 1

>1
327.5
1 = 1/1.25 = 0.80

= 0.51
0.5Vc < Vs < Vc+ 0.4 Ref. 2
0.26 < 0.62 < 0.91

OK
Vc+ 0.4 < Vs < 0.8*(fcu)0.5
0.91 < 0.62 < 5.06
= 0.4 x 200 x 600 /(0.87 x 500)

2
= 110 mm
2
No of legs = 2
2
2
= 157.0 > 110 mm Ok
Sheet 4 of 4
Prepared by: A A
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Shear Reinforcement for Shear Force at Horizontal Face Reference
Maximum shear force = 91.70 kN

= 137.6 kN
= 137.55 x 10^3 /(400 x 527.5)

= 0.65 MPa
/ /
100 400 1
where
/ (1/3)
= (0.204530771718085)
= 0.59 < 3
< 3
/ = 400.0 = 0.93 < 1

>1
527.5
1 = 1/1.25 = 0.80

= 0.44
0.5Vc < Vs < Vc+ 0.4 Ref. 2
0.22 < 0.65 < 0.84

OK
Vc+ 0.4 < Vs < 0.8*(fcu)0.5
0.84 < 0.65 < 0.00
= 0.4 x 200 x 400 /(0.87 x )

2
= 73 mm
2
No of legs = 2
2
2
= 157.0 > 73 mm Ok
Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319


Section 2a 300 @ 350 3 87

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319


Section 2a 300 @ 350 3 87

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319


Section 2a 300 @ 350 3 87

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319


Section 2a 300 @ 350 3 87

Output Version 2015.0.19038.12319
0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80 0.88 0.96
0.96
0.88
0.80
0.72
0.64
0.56
0.48
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.00
Axial forces N (scaled up 0.0500 times)


Section 2a 300 @ 350 3 87

Design of Strut

Annexure 5
Sheet 1 of 2
Prepared by: M N
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Strut Design for Section 2a Reference
Ref 1 - Project Specification
Ref 2 - BS 5950-1:2000
Ref 3 - PLAXIS Model
A) Steel Beam
Beam Type considered = UC: 305x305x97 Ref 1
Grade of Steel = S275 grade
Length of Beam = 5.6 m
Overll depth of beam, D = 307.9 mm
Flange width, wf = 305.3 mm
Thickness of flange, T = 15.4 mm
Depth of web, d = 277.1 mm
Thickness of web, t = 9.9 mm
Plastic Modulus, Sx = 1592000 mm3
Plastic Modulus, Sy = 726000 mm3
Elastic Modulus, Zx = 1445000 mm3
Elastic Modulus, Zy = 479x103 mm3
Area of section, Ag = 12300.0 mm2
Radius of gyration, rx = 134.0 mm
Radius of gyration, ry = 76.9 mm
Design strength, p y = 275 MPa Ref. 2
Analysis Details
Maximum axial load for struts = 106.8 kN Ref. 3
Ultimate axial load = 160.2 kN
Type of Section
Parameter, = Ref. 2
= 1.00
Outstand flange element, b = wf - t Ref. 2
2
= 305.3 - 9.9
2
= 147.7 mm
Flanges Web
Plastic = 9 = 9 Plastic = 80 = 80
Compact = 10 = 10 Compact = 100 = 100
Semi-compact = 15 = 15 Sem-compact = 120 = 120
Sheet 2 of 2
Prepared by: M N
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Width to thickness ratio = b/T < Ref. 2

= 9.6 < 10.00 " Flange is Compact"
Depth to thickness ratio = d/t < Ref. 2
= 28.0 < 80 "Web is Plastic"
Hence, the section can be classified into Class 2: Compact as per BS: 5950 -1 2000
Considering strut element as "pinned" at both ends, effective length shall be equal to length of strut.
Both sides of the strut are supported at the capping beam installed at the shoring wall.
Effective length of strut, Le = 5.6 m
Slenderness ratio in x-direction, =Le/r = 42.0
Slenderness ratio in y-direction, =Le/r = 73.0
Buckling strength in x-direction, pcx = 258 MPa Ref: 2
Buckling strength in y-direction, pcy = 218 MPa Ref: 2
Buckling capacity in x-direction, Pbx = 3173 > 160 kN Ref: 2
Buckling capacity in x-direction, Pby = 2681 > 160 kN Ref: 2
Moment due to self-weight, Mx = 3.7 kNm
Shear due to self-weight, Fv = 2.7 kN
Check for Shear Reference
Shear Area, Av = Dt Ref. 2
= 307.9x9.9
= 3048.21 mm2
Shear Capacity, Pv = 0.6pyAv Ref. 2
= 503 > 2.66 kN
Max. shear force exerted in the strut, Fv = 2.7 < 503 kN O.K
Check for Moment
Type of shear
0.6 Pv = 301.8 > 2.664 kN
"Low Shear" Ref. 2
Moment Capacity, Mc = pyS Ref. 2
= 275 x 1445000
= 397375000 Nmm
= 397.4 kNm
Max. moment exerted in the strut = 3.73 < 397.4 kNm
Fc Mx My
+ + 1
Aeffpy Mcx Mcy
0.047 + 0.014 + 0 = 0.061 1 OK
Hence, the Strut UC: 305x305x97 will be used
SECTION 2b
STRUCTURAL DESIGN

Annexure 5

Annexure 5
Sheet 1 of 1
Prepared by: A A
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Design of Shoring Section 2b References
Ref:2- BS 4449
Design Basis
Load factor = 1.50
Maximum Bending Moment, Ms1 = 222.70 kN-m/m Ref:1

Provided Reinforcement = 10T20
Maximum Shear force, SF1 = 107.70 kN/m Ref:1

Note: Rebar details are available in drawing attached under Annexure 2.
Title = Shoring Pile at Section 2b (600mm)
Organization = -
Engineer = Shaker
RC Column Section
Material
Calculations

Minimum steel ratio governs the design


Detail CONTIGUOUS PILE SHORING - Sec 2b

600 128.73 300 203 282,743.34 0.431 0.445 216442.128 429.234 504.252

2 2 2 2 2
-171.2727137 0.0 0.00 0.00 282,743.34 282,743.34 0.00 0 0.00%

171.2727137 246.3 55.19 21,092.58 196,056.81 238,241.96 44,501.38 1853 0.86%

0.600 0.29 0.652 0.76 0.485 0.38 1.16 5.00 2 150
Vs1 63.70 1 78.54

10
VS2 0.00 0 78.54
Povided
Reference :

Annexure 5
Sheet 1 of 2
Prepared by: M N
EXTENSION OF AMIRIR DIWAN BUILDING
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
Structural Design of Capping Beam Section 2b References
Ref:1- Tender Documents
Ref:2- BS 8110-1:1997
Design Basis
Compressive strength of concrete, fcu = 40 MPa Ref:1
Width of capping beam, w = 600 mm
Depth of capping beam, D = 0.75 m
Effective depth, d = 682 mm
Clear cover = 50 mm
Clear distance between two piles, Lc = 0.05 m
Load Factor, f = 1.50
Surcharge, qa = 20 kPa Ref:1
Unit weight of top soil, = 18
Angle of internal friction, = 30
Active earth pressure coefficient, ka = 0.33 Ref:1
Loads
Vertical load, w = Self weight
= 11.25 kN/m
= 11.25 kN/m
Surcharge = qa
Capping beam
Retained Soil
Lateral pressure due to retained soil = Ka x surcharge + Kah

= 0.33 x 20 + 0.33 x 18 x0.75
= 11.06 kPa
Lateral load due to retained soil = 11.055 x 0.75
Force, w = 8.29 kN/m
Capping beam analysis
Bending Moment on vertical face , M1 = w x l2 /2
= 8.29 x 0.75x0.75/2
= 2.332 KNm
Sheet 2 of 2
Prepared by: M N
Checked by: G D
Date 19-Jul-17
References
Shear force , SF1 = wxl /2 kN
= 3.109 kN
Capping beam design
Based on the analyses results, minimum steel is required to resist the said forces
Minimum steel ratio for beam, (100 As/bh) = 0.15 % Ref:2

Required Steel area = 0.15 x 600 x (0.75 x 1000) / 100
= 675.0 mm2
Dia of main rebar = 16
No of required main rebar = 4
No of provided main rebar = 4
Area of the provided rebar = 804 mm2
4T16 rebar will be provided on the each vertical and horizontal face of the capping beam.
Factored shear force, SF = 1.50 kN

Shear Stress in concrete = 1.5 x 10^3 / (600 x 682)
= 0.003 MPa
Concrete shear strength for C25 concrete = 0.57 MPa Ref:2
Concrete shear strength for C40 concrete = 0.57 x(40/25)^1/3 Ref:2
= 0.667 MPa
Concrete shear strength is sufficient to take this shear but we have provided minimum
shear reinforcement
Shear Reinforcement = T10@200mm c/c
SECTION 3
STRUCTURAL DESIGN

Annexure 5

Annexure 5
Sheet 1 of 1
Prepared by: A A
Checked by: G D
Date 5-Jul-17
Design of Shoring Section 3 References
Ref:2- BS 4449
Design Basis
Load factor = 1.50
Maximum Bending Moment, Ms1 = 281.50 kN-m/m Ref:1

Provided Reinforcement = 7T32 (Full Length)
7T32 (6.0m)
Maximum Shear force, SF1 = 133.40 kN/m Ref:1
Provided Reinforcement = T16@250mm c/c
Note: Rebar details are available in drawing attached under Annexure 2.
Title = Shoring Pile at Section 3
Organization = -
Engineer = Shaker
RC Column Section
Material
Calculations

Minimum steel ratio governs the design


Detail CONTIGUOUS PILE SHORING - Sec 3

900 273.50 450 347 636,172.51 0.491 0.513 508600.356 670.907 758.079

2 2 2 2 2
-176.50306 0.0 0.00 0.00 636,172.51 636,172.51 0.00 0 0.00%

176.50306 413.9 66.91 36,530.88 399,704.60 472,766.35 163,406.16 8367 1.65%

0.746 0.43 0.823 0.96 0.374 0.48 1.36 5.00 2 150
Vs1 95.76 1 113.10

12
VS2 0.00 0 113.10
Povided
Reference :

Annexure 5
Sheet 1 of 2
Prepared by: M N
Checked by: G D
Date 8-Jul-17
Structural Design of Capping Beam Section 3 References
Ref:1- Tender Documents
Ref:2- BS 8110-1:1997
Design Basis
Compressive strength of concrete, fcu = 40 MPa Ref:1
Width of capping beam, w = 900 mm
Depth of capping beam, D = 0.60 m
Effective depth, d = 530 mm
Clear cover = 50 mm
Clear distance between two piles, Lc = 0.05 m
Load Factor, f = 1.50
Surcharge, qa = 20 kPa Ref:1
Unit weight of top soil, = 18
Angle of internal friction, = 30
Active earth pressure coefficient, ka = 0.33 Ref:1
Loads
Vertical load, w = Self weight
= 13.50 kN/m
= 13.50 kN/m
Surcharge = qa
Capping beam
Retained Soil
Lateral pressure due to retained soil = Ka x surcharge + Kah

= 0.33 x 20 + 0.33 x 18 x0.6
= 10.16 kPa
Lateral load due to retained soil = 10.164 x 0.6
Force, w = 6.10 kN/m
Capping beam analysis
Bending Moment on vertical face , M1 = w x l2 /2
= 6.1 x 0.6x0.6/2
= 1.098 KNm
Sheet 2 of 2
Prepared by: M N
Checked by: G D
Date 8-Jul-17
References
Shear force , SF1 = wxl /2 kN
= 1.83 kN
Capping beam design
Based on the analyses results, minimum steel is required to resist the said forces
Minimum steel ratio for beam, (100 As/bh) = 0.15 % Ref:2

Required Steel area = 0.15 x 900 x (0.6 x 1000) / 100
= 810.0 mm2
Dia of main rebar = 20
No of required main rebar = 3
No of provided main rebar = 4
Area of the provided rebar = 1257 mm2
4T20 rebar will be provided on the each vertical and horizontal face of the capping beam.
Factored shear force, SF = 1.50 kN

Shear Stress in concrete = 1.5 x 10^3 / (900 x 530)
= 0.005 MPa
Concrete shear strength for C25 concrete = 0.57 MPa Ref:2
Concrete shear strength for C40 concrete = 0.57 x(40/25)^1/3 Ref:2
= 0.667 MPa
Concrete shear strength is sufficient to take this shear but we have provided minimum
shear reinforcement
Shear Reinforcement = T10@200mm c/c

Design Report Rev 02

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Design Report Rev 02

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

EXTENSION OF AMIRI DIWAN PROJECT

02 19-July-17 For Approval AA GD

01 05-June-17 For Approval MN GD

00 16-May-17 For Approval MN GD

REV DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED VERIFIED APPROVED

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

SUBSURFACE PROFILE FOR DESIGN ANNEXURE 1

SHORING KEY PLAN & SHORING SECTIONS ANNEXURE 2

SURCHARGE LOAD CALCULATIONS ANNEXURE 3

PLAXIS ANALYSIS RESULTS ANNEXURE 4

STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM ANNEXURE 5

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

2. PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE SHORING SYSTEM

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

Section 1: 600@650mm diameter contiguous pile (cantilever) with capping beam.

Simsima Limestone (+4.0 m to END)

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

6.1 Shoring Piles

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

Detailed calculations of surcharge load for each section is available at Annexure 3.

The structural properties of the proposed shoring system are as follows;

Table 2: Shoring System Properties

Soil / wall interface =0.67

6.2 Capping Beams

Table 3: Bracing / Capping Beam Properties

6.3 Steel Strut

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

7. ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

Application of Surcharge Load

Activation of Shoring Piles

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

Activation of Capping Beam

Excavation down to formation level

Excavation for Pit

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

Table 5: Summary of Results for Contiguous Pile Analysis

1 148.9 220.9 6.97

Table 6: Summary of Results for Capping Beam

Structural Design of Pile

Analysis & Design of Capping Beam

1 Capping Beam 90.46 156.4 4T16 T10@200

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

Application of Surcharge Pressure

Activation of Shoring Piles

Excavation up to Strut level

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

Excavation up to Final Formation Level

Table 9: Summary of Results for Micro Pile

Max. Bending Moment Max. Shear Force Deflection

2a 56.66 100.7 16.79

Table 10: Summary of Results for Bracing Beam / Capping Beam

Section Bending Moment Shear Force Bending Moment Shear Force

2a 27.18 81.61 50.52 91.70

Table 11: Summary of Results for Struts

DESIGN OF SHORING SYSTEM

Table 12: Summary of Design of Shoring System at Section 2a

Analysis & Design of Bracing Beams

Table 13: Summary of Design of Shoring System

Analysis & Design of Strut at Capping / Bracing Beam

Table 14: Summary of Strut Design

Max. Axial Load