Cerdas Menulis Makalah Berkualitas

Terry Mart
 Jumlah Publikasi Ilmiah per tahun

5000

0
10000
15000
20000
25000
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001

Tahun
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Situasi saat ini di ASEAN

2012
Vietnam
Thailand
Malaysia
Indonesia

Singapura
 Paper di Jurnal dan Proceedings dari 10 PT Teratas di Indonesia
600

500

UI
Jumlah makalah ilmiah

400 ITB
UGM
IPB
300
ITS
UNDIP
200
UNPAD
UNAIR
100 UNHAS
UB

0
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Tahun
Scopus Nov. 2013
 Paper di Jurnal Intl (Scopus) dari 10 PT Teratas di Indonesia
300

Scopus Nov. 2013

250

UI
200
Jumlah Makalah

ITB
UGM
150 IPB
ITS
UNDIP
100 UNPAD
UNAIR
UNHAS
50 UB

0
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
TAHUN
 Paradigma yang berlaku
Makalah penting dengan hasil penelitian
berkualitas Jurnal Internasional
Makalah selain itu Jurnal Nasional
Terakreditasi A atau B
Tidak terakreditasi
Konferensi (prosiding)
Fenomena yang terjadi global, tidak dapat
dihindari
Namun ada solusi internasionalisasi jurnal dan
peningkatan kualitas penelitian nasional
 Proses iteratif
Kualitas penelitian meningkat kualitas jurnal
meningkat
Kualitas jurnal meningkat menjadi jurnal
internasional
Kontribusi peneliti sangat penting bagi jurnal
nasional
Chief Editor jurnal IOP: Menjadi kewajiban jurnal
kami untuk menerbitkan makalah-makalah penting
& berkualitas, menjadi kewajiban author untuk
melakukan penelitian penting & berkualitas
 Poin paling penting bagi makalah berkualitas
Substansi isi makalah atau kualitas hasil
penelitian
Topik penelitian
Up to date
Kepentingan nasional (strategis)
Agar selalu uptodate kontak komunitas
Mengandalkan studi literatur kurang akurat
dan kurang efektif
 Topik penelitian makalah berkualitas

Pilih topik penelitian yang sesuai dengan

expertise penggunaan maksimal dari
intelektual, kolaborasi sunah
Topik-topik di luar expertise (jangan terlalu
jauh) kolaborasi wajib
Penelitian dilakukan dengan kaidah baku
diakui
Apa yang pertama dilihat referee temuan
 JUMLAH

Hampir tidak mungkin dipublikasi

Kebanyakan makalah

Mudah untuk dipublikasi

KUALITAS
Distribusi normal berlaku untuk kualitas makalah
 Isi seberkas makalah umumnya
Judul
Abstrak (Ikhtisar)
Pendahuluan (Mengapa penulis mengerjakan ini?)
Material dan Metode (Apa yang dilakukan penulis?)
Hasil (Apa yang ditemukan penulis?)
Diskusi (Apa artinya penemuan tersebut?)
Kesimpulan
Ucapan Terimakasih (Acknowledgments)
Daftar Acuan
 Judul, Nama Penulis, dan Institusi
The Title is the first thing a reader will see of our paper.
Therefore, the writing of the title deserves special care. It
should convey the greatest amount of information in the
smallest number of words.
Pengalaman Penulis: Tidak pernah menjadi masalah. Judul
bisa menarik. Contoh:
G.T. Horowitz and E. Silverstein, The Inside story:
Quasilocal tachyons and black holes, Phys. Rev. D73:
064016,2006.
A. Adams, J. Polchinski, E. Silverstein, Dont panic! Closed
string tachyons in ALE space-times, JHEP 0110:029,2001.
H. Georgi, Fun with Higgsless theories, Phys. Rev. D71:
015016, 2005.
 Abstrak (Ikhtisar)
Every paper must have an abstract. It should be
about 5% of the length of the article, but less than
500 words. It should state all subjects about which
new information is given and the conclusions and
results. For experimental papers it should specify
clearly what quantities were measured. It should not
contain footnotes, coined words, or acronyms which
are not explained.
Pengalaman Penulis: Jarang menjadi masalah
 Pendahuluan (Mengapa penulis mengerjakan ini?)
The purpose of a scientific paper is to communicate new
scientific information among the scientist. Therefore, the first
objective is to demonstrate that the story being told is worth
telling and it is the job of the Introduction to do this.
In order to arrive at this objective an Introduction should also
contain a hypothesis preceded by a series of logical
statements which make that hypothesis a sensible thing to
have tested.
Pengalaman Penulis: Sering menjadi masalah!
Contoh
 Contoh problem pada Pendahuluan
The objective of the paper is to calculate the role of the neutron
structure on the binding energy of neutrons.In particular the
authors wish to consider the role of the electric form factor that is
finite at finite momentum transfers. Using the usual method of
fourier transforming
I believe that there is an effect of the neutron charge form factor
but it is not appropriate to dramatize it when it is really small and
perhaps within the difficult calculations for the binding energy of
the neutron in Deuteron and much more so in the case of Be.
In view of these comments I would suggest that the authors
consider the suggestions carefully and modify the paper accordingly.
The introduction part of the paper can be compactified
considerably.
The paper should not be published it its present form.
 Metode (Apa yang dilakukan penulis?)

This section is straightforward. The criterion for a well-

written Methods of Research section is that a
reasonably knowledgeable colleague could repeat our
investigation (or experiment) after reading the
description. This could become a serious problem since
the author is usually very familiar with the research
technique and, therefore, could leave out important
details unconsciously.
Pengalaman Penulis: Bagian yang paling sering menjadi
fokus pemeriksaan referee. Sering menjadi masalah
 Contoh problem pada Metode
The subject of the study sounds interesting since the author compares the
calculations from the Regge model with the isobar model and finds a
strong difference in absolute cross sections. Prior to further consideration
the author should clarify several details of this study:
1. Generally the Regge model is applied at high energies, and at low
energies Regge calculations are comparable with the isobar model. Can
the author derive the low energy limit of the Regge propagator and show
whether it converges to the Feynman propagator; alternatively, what is
the difference? There is a strong statement by A. Donnachie and P.V.
Landshoff that Regge theory is applicable at at p s 5 or 10 GeV (Phys.
Lett. B 296, 227 1992). Does this negate the authors analysis?
2. It is not clear whether the author used a form factor for the Regge model
calculations. Regge calculations require phenomenological form factors
in order to reproduce the measured t dependence. Please clarify.
3. Why were the first two diagrams not considered in the Regge model and
how does the author motivate that? Nucleon exchange is well treated by
the Regge approach, which is discussed in detail in the series of
publications by J.-M. Laget.
 Diskusi (Apa artinya penemuan tersebut?)
The main topic for the Discussion should be whether or not the
hypothesis mentioned in the Introduction is supported by the results
of investigation. All literature cited in this section must have the
function of supporting arguments about the Results. Some scientific
journals allow the authors to combine Results and Discussion in one
section. However, the advantage of separating Results and
Discussion is that it preserves the objectivity of the Results.
Pengalaman Penulis: Bagian yang paling sering menjadi fokus
pemeriksaan referee. Sering menjadi masalah. Contoh:
The manuscript presents the results of the analysis in a misleading
fashion. In table I the author compares results with a fixed h with
previous results that contain model dependence. The author does
not allow h or the hadronic model to vary and so the full model
dependence of the present result is not explored. It is misleading
and wrong to make this comparison. I recommend the paper not be
published.
 Kesimpulan
The Summary, which is usually placed after the Discussion, is
the first thing a reader will normally look at after he/she has
been attracted by the title. The formula for a good summary
is: it should expand the title and condense the paper! A
summary for a scientific report should be informative, while
for review articles it should be descriptive.
Pengalaman Penulis: Jarang menjadi masalah
 Ucapan Terimakasih (Acknowledgments)

Acknowledgments should be a simple statement of

thanks for help and may not be a dedication or
memorial. Acknowledgments to people should
precede those of financial support.

Pengalaman Penulis: Tidak pernah menjadi masalah

 Daftar Acuan
Every journal has a rigid format for the citation of references. Unfortunately,
this is not standard among journals and is one of the most frustrating
aspects of writing papers. In general, a reference for a journal article
usually consists of
The name of all authors
Year of publication
The name of journal, written in abbreviated form
Volume number
First page numbers of the article
The complete format for a book reference may have a different form, as well
as for conference proceedings, theses, or scientific reports. Refer to the
NOTATION GUIDE of the TARGET JOURNAL.
Pengalaman Penulis: Jarang menjadi masalah, kecuali jika informasi tentang
referensi kurang lengkap atau salah (cek online)
 Masalah Bahasa Inggris
Meski tidak esensial, bisa menjadi masalah besar!
Lihat contoh potongan komentar Referee:
In its current form, I am not ready to recommend
publication of this paper. I would like the authors
to address the comments that I raised above .
Ideally, I would like to see a new . I would also
like the authors to add fitting uncertainties to
their tabulated resonance parameters. Finally, the
authors should have an expert in English
grammar review their paper before it is
resubmitted.
 Masalah Lain
Masalah gambar,
ukuran legend,
color online,
dan sebagainya

IKUTI SAJA PETUNJUK JURNAL !!