Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304366036
CITATIONS READS
2 86
6 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Use of seawater in mining (Atacama Seawater) ... see more in www.aguatacama.cl View project
All content following this page was uploaded by A. Lopez-Valdivieso on 28 June 2016.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
Minerals Engineering xxx (2016) xxxxxx
Minerals Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mineng
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: This article presents a strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits based on experimental
Received 24 December 2015 data and the assumption that the flotation circuit structure are not very sensitive to stage recovery. The
Revised 17 May 2016 main objective is to find a set of optimal flotation circuit configurations, including the best metallurgical
Accepted 12 June 2016
conditions for the process and cell design. The optimization process maximizes the Net Present Value
Available online xxxx
(NPV). This methodology consists of two steps. The first step of the methodology entails obtaining data
from the laboratory. Different metallurgical conditions are tested for different flotation stages. Each met-
Keywords:
allurgical condition is evaluated to determine its kinetics. The second step of the methodology is the opti-
Flotation
Optimization
mization process. The optimization process achieves the best solution by optimizing cell design, flotation
Design circuit structure and metallurgical conditions. The optimization process has three phases. The first phase
Frother assumes that every flotation stage has the same residence time and calculates feasible flotation circuits,
Collector and kinetics metallurgical conditions and cell volumes. This process is performed for several residence times and,
therefore, a set of feasible solutions is generated. The second phase takes the previous set of feasible solu-
tions and calculates the residence time at each flotation stage. Then, for each phase two solution, the opti-
mal flotation circuit, metallurgical conditions and cell design are calculated. The final product is a set of
optimal solutions than can be considered for further study. The procedure is illustrated by the design of a
zinc flotation plant, considering seven flotation stages and five species.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
0892-6875/ 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Calisaya, D.A., et al. A strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits. Miner. Eng. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
2 D.A. Calisaya et al. / Minerals Engineering xxx (2016) xxxxxx
the behavior according to the operating conditions and circuit the process. With these two steps, real data are included in flota-
structure that are used. On the other hand, models based on first tion circuit design.
principles are too complex for use in design systems based on opti-
mization (Hu et al., 2013). Even the use of first-order kinetics can 2.1. Step one: Experimental kinetics
be a challenging problem if many flotation circuit stages are used
or many species are considered (Cisternas et al., 2015). The first step of the methodology requires experimental flota-
There are several methodologies for flotation circuit design tion tests. Different metallurgical conditions are tested, depending
using superstructure and optimization methods. Examples of these on the mineral of interest to be floated. For instance, different
procedures are the works of Schena et al. (1997), Cisternas et al. frothers, collectors or dispersants can be tested. It is important to
(2004, 2006, 2014), Mndez et al. (2009), Hu et al. (2013), and consider the different types of flotation stages. For instance, in
Pirouzan et al. (2014). These procedures are difficult to solve; thus, the rougher stage it will be more important to test the concentra-
in the literature, most authors use first-order models for banks (not tions of the collector and frother. However, in the cleaner stage the
cells) and consider few species. There are cell models that can be pyrite depressant can be more important. Performing many tests
used in optimization problems, but because these problems are will increase laboratory and computational costs; therefore, tests
combinatorial, the use of the bank approach permits the dimension must be chosen carefully. Flotation tests are performed to consider
of the mathematical problem to be maintained within a more rea- recovery at different times. The objective is to obtain kinetic mod-
sonable size (Schena et al., 1997). In addition, this problem is a els based on the experimental data. For example, the experimental
non-convex mixed integer nonlinear programming model, which data for each laboratory condition can be adjusted using a fast-
is difficult to solve using commercial software (Jamett et al., slow flotation model (Pirouzan et al., 2014) to represent the behav-
2015). For example, Hu et al. (2013) used a cell model, but few cells ior of particles with different levels of liberation.
were included in the case study with two species because of the
computational cost. Another example is the procedure proposed T T 1 1 eK f t 1 1 eK s t 1
by Ghobadi et al. (2011), which considered true flotation and
where T is the recovery and T 1 is the maximum recovery that can
entrainment. Nevertheless, the computation costs were very high,
be achieved. The parameter is the fraction of fast particles, and t
with a CPU time of 1 h for 10,000 generations of a two-stage flota-
is the residence time. For the definition of , the recovery can be
tion circuit with three species using genetic algorithms. First-order
analyzed as a function of particle size, and the fraction of fast par-
models with few species have been extensively used in the design
ticles can be assumed to be equal to the fraction of intermediate
of flotation circuits using optimization (Schena et al., 1997; Abu-Ali
particle size. Then, the fraction of slow species, 1 , corresponds
and Sabour, 2003; Cisternas et al., 2004; Guria et al., 2005, 2006;
to the fraction of coarse and very fine particles. The others param-
Maldonado et al., 2011 amongst several other works). In these
eters, K f and K s , representing the kinetics of fast and slow species,
works, it is assumed that the flotation rate constants for a particu-
respectively, as well as T 1 can be determined by fitting the exper-
lar species are identical in each cell. This assumption may be an
imental values to the model of Eq. (1) using a non-linear regression
oversimplification, but is commonly used in industrial practice
procedure.
(Guria et al., 2005).
In addition, the feed grade and metal price have stochastic
2.2. Step two: Optimization process
uncertainties, and the kinetic model has epistemic uncertainty
(lack of knowledge of the correct value of the kinetic parameters).
The second step concerns process design based on mathemati-
Thus, several studies have been developed to evaluate the effects of
cal optimization using the kinetic models obtained in step one. A
uncertainties in flotation process design (Montenegro et al., 2013,
model is developed to calculate the optimal circuit configuration,
2015; Jamett et al., 2015; Cisternas et al., 2015). These studies have
operation conditions and cell design. This work uses a superstruc-
noted that the optimal flotation circuit structure is not very sensi-
ture of stages that represent different flotation circuit configura-
tive to the stage recovery values. In fact, it has been recently
tions. The superstructure is based on the generic representation
demonstrated that for a given flotation circuit design problem,
of a stage, which is used to represent all stages that are to be
there are few structures that are optimal for a wide range of spe-
included in the design.
cies stage recovery values (Cisternas et al., 2015).
Fig. 1 shows the superstructure representing a flotation stage,
The aim of this paper is to propose a strategy for the identifica-
tion of a set of optimal flotation circuits based on the fact that few where the triangle represents a feed mixer that enables streams
(concentrations or tails) from other stages or flotation feeds to be
flotation circuit structures are optimal for a given problem and
fed to stage i. The triangles in the output streams represent split-
based on the knowledge of existing ones and experimental results.
ters and allow the concentrate and tail streams from stage i to be
The method includes two steps: first, testing under different oper-
send to other stages. The connection of all stages is unrealistic.
ating conditions, which are used to model recovery at each stage,
For instance the concentrate of the cleaner stage cannot be send
and second, an optimization procedure that is used to obtain a
set of optimal flotation circuit designs. This paper is divided into
four parts; the first is the introduction. The second part describes
the methodology used, which includes the experimental section
Feed Tail
and the optimization process. The third section reports a study M stage i s
case of the design of a zinc flotation circuit. Finally, the conclusions
are given.
Concentrate
2. Methodology
s
Please cite this article in press as: Calisaya, D.A., et al. A strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits. Miner. Eng. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
D.A. Calisaya et al. / Minerals Engineering xxx (2016) xxxxxx 3
to the rougher stage as feed; therefore, an origin-destination to circuit Ff k is a parameter, so the values are known. The mass
matrix is used to represent the feasible connection between flota- balances are considered in the splitters:
tion stages. This approach is very important because it allows the X
optimization problem to remain a reasonable size. CCi; k F c i; j; k; 8k 2 K i 2 I 2
j2LC
The mathematical model allows optimizing the flotation circuit,
metallurgical conditions, cell volumes and residence times. The X
last two are considered elements of cell design. The metallurgical CTi; k F w i; j; k; 8k 2 K i 2 I 3
j2LT
conditions are the conditions from the experimental kinetic test
in step one. The optimization is very challenging because the where CCi; k and CTi; k are the mass flow rates of concentrate
model is a non-convex mixed-integer nonlinear programming and tails, respectively, from stage i and species k. The concentrate
problem (MINLP). Our experience is that the use of commercial streams from stage i can be sent to other stages j (including the final
software such as BARON does not converge to the optimal solution product or tail); however, only one destination is allowed. That is,
after several days for medium size problems (e.g., three species and 2 yci;j
3
four stages) using a PC with specifications such as i7 processor and _ X
4CCi F c i; j; k5 4
8 GB of RAM. Others techniques based on metaheuristics (e.g., i; j 2 LC k2K
genetic algorithms) have very high computational costs and there-
fore cannot be applied. Thus, here the optimization process is where yci;j is a binary variable indicating the choice of destination of
divided in three phases. the concentrate stream. This equation can be converted using the
The first phase of the optimization considers that each flotation convex hull method in:
stages has the same residence time, which is a fixed value. There- X
fore, the recoveries at each stage are parameters that make the yci;j F LO
c 6 F c i; j; k 6 yci;j F UP
c 8i; j 2 LC 5
model a mixed-integer linear programing problem (MILP). By k2K
conditions and volumes for each flotation stage. The second phase yci;j is a binary variable, so it can be 1 if destination j is selected or 0
of the optimization calculates the optimum residence time at each
otherwise. F LO
c and F c
UP
are the lower and upper boundaries of the
flotation stage using the flotation circuit structure, cell volumes
and operational conditions calculated in the previous phase. This mass flow rate of species k in the concentrate stream. The upper
is a MINLP that is easy to solve because the structure is fixed and mass flow rate can be estimated as three times the feed to the
the operational conditions are known. The outputs of this phase circuit. The tail streams are considered in a similar way to the
are the optimum residence times at each flotation stage. The third concentrate streams:
2 3
phase of the optimization achieves an optimal flotation circuit yw
_ Xi;j
based on the same principle as phase one. The input for this phase 4CTi F w i; j; k5 7
is the residence time at each flotation stage from phase two. The i; j 2 LT k2K
model is a MILP. The outputs are an optimum flotation circuit, met-
allurgical condition and cells volumes. where yw
i;j is a binary variable indicating the choice of destination of
This procedure is realized for several residence times, as shown the tail stream.
in Fig. 2. If the flotation circuit structure obtained at the end of X
yw LO
i;j F w 6 F w i; j; k 6 yw UP
i;j F w 8i; j 2 LT 8
phase three is new, this structure is saved. The operational condi-
k2K
tions and cell design are updated if a better solution is identified.
The final product is a set of optimal flotation circuit design (struc- X
i;j 1
yw 8i 2 I 9
ture, operational condition and cell design). The procedure does j2LT
not ensure that the best alternative in the set of optimal solutions
LO UP
is the global solution, however based on the results of Cisternas The binary variable yw i;j can be 0 or 1. F w and F w are the lower and
et al. (2015) it is very likely that the global solution is reached. upper boundaries for the tail flow rate of species k. The superstruc-
ture in Fig. 1 shows that the feed of each stage is a mixer and its out-
puts are two splitters, one for the concentrate and another for the
2.2.1. Mathematical model
tail. The feed to stage j is given by the sum of the streams, concen-
The model is designed to calculate the best structure and to
trate and tail, from other stages:
select operational conditions and cell design. For this purpose, it X X
is necessary to define sets, parameters and variables. The sets are FSj; k F c i; j; k F w i; j; k 8k 2 K; j 2 I 10
as follows: II = {i/i is a flotation stage, circuit feed, final tail or final i2LC i2LT
concentrate}; I = {i/i is a flotation stage, i 2 II}; L = {(i,j)/(i,j) is a
The final concentrate is defined by the sum of all the concentrate
stream from stage i to stage j i,j 2 L}; k = {k/k is a species}; LC =
streams going to the final product (P):
{(i,j)/(i,j) is a concentrate stream (i,j) 2 L}; LT = {(i,j)/(i,j) is a tail X
stream (i,j) 2 L}; D = {d/d is a disjunction}; DI = {(i,d)/(i,d) is a CFk F c i; P; k; 8k 2 K 11
disjunction d or operational condition for stage i, d 2 D i 2 I}; and i2LC
DV = {dv/dv is a volume disjunction}. The final tail is the sum of all tail streams going to the final tail (W):
X
Each streami; j is associated with the variable Fi; j; k WFk F w i; W; k; 8k 2 K 12
Fc i; j; k wherei; j 2 LC i2LT
Fw i; j; k wherei; j 2 LT CFk and WFk are the final flow rates of concentrate and tail,
respectively. The mass balance of the whole circuit is the relation-
where F(i,j,k) represents the mass flow rate of species k in the ship among the feed to the process, the final concentrate and the
stream from stage i to stage j. The mass flow rate of species k fed final tail:
Please cite this article in press as: Calisaya, D.A., et al. A strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits. Miner. Eng. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
4 D.A. Calisaya et al. / Minerals Engineering xxx (2016) xxxxxx
X X
F f k CFk WFk; 8k 2 K 13 WFkgk; ms 6 g UP
w WFk 16
X X X k k
F f k CFk WFk 14 where gk; ms is the ms mineral grade of species k. The circuit
k2K k2K k2K
optimization must be completed with the recovery values for each
Until this part of the model, the mass balances have been ana- stage. The model uses the recovery values to calculate which
lyzed. However, in a flotation stage, it is necessary to determine metallurgical parameter will be chosen. Each stage has different
the concentrate and tail requirements. The minimum concentrate alternatives depending on the laboratory experiments. For instance,
grade is determined according to the mineral of study (ms). A cleaner stages can have more alternatives because they include
c 0:54).
boundary for the final concentration is assigned (e.g., g LO milling. All operational alternatives are defined by the disjunction
This limit is also applied to the tail, which must not exceed the d. Then, the recovery Ti; k; d is considered to calculate the mass
grade of the mineral of study (e.g., g UP w 0:1). The following
balance at each stage:
equations are used: 2 3
di; k
X X _ 6 7
CFkgk; ms P g LO CFk 15 4 CCi; k Ti; k; d FSi; k 5 8i 2 I; k 2 K 17
c d 2 DI
k k CTi; k 1 Ti; k; d Si; k
Please cite this article in press as: Calisaya, D.A., et al. A strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits. Miner. Eng. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
D.A. Calisaya et al. / Minerals Engineering xxx (2016) xxxxxx 5
P
V dLOv yVdv ;i 6 Vddv 6 V dUPv yVdv ;i , and
In Eq. (17), the value of Ti; k; d is selected using a disjunction for i V
dv 2DV ydv ;i 1
different values of Ti; k; d given by the operational conditions X i
defined by laboratory tests. In other words, the optimization algo- IF i adv yVdv ;i bdv Vddv 24
rithm selects the disjunction that performs best for each stage. dv 2DV
when income is earned. Eq. (21) represents the fixed capital. This 29
value is directly related to the fixed capital at each stage. The fixed
capital is volume dependent. where H represents annual operational hours.
X Eq. (30) describes the total cost, where C op i is the operational
IF FL IF i Ni 21 cost at stage i, MCM is the cost implied in the Mine-Crushing-
i2I Milling operation and FSi; k is the feeding stream.
X X
where FL is the Lang factor for fixed capital, N(i) is the number of Total Cost C op i MCM FSi; k 30
cells at stage i and IF i is the fixed capital per cell described in i2I k2K
Eq. (22). This cost function was updated from the model given by
Ruhmer et al. (1991). The operational cost at stage i was calculated using Eq. (31)
(Cisternas et al., 2004)
2
IF i 105:7 10:72 Vi 149:1 Vi 22
C op i H Vi Ni E Pk 8i 2 I 31
However, Eq. (22) is a quadratic equation and in order to simplify
where E is the energy per cubic meter, and P k the cost per kW h.
the model and obtain a linear mathematical model for phase I in
the optimization process, Eq. (22) is approximated by a series of line
segments, as shown in the following disjunction: 3. Case study
2 3
yVdv ;i 3.1. Case study description
_ 6 7
6 I i a b Vdi 7 8i 2 I 23
dv 2 DV 4 F dv dv dv 5
The study case considers a plant that concentrates zinc. The
V dLOv 6 Vddv 6 V dUPv
i
flotation stages considered are the same stages currently utilized
The linear equations are represented by adv and bdv depending on in the plant (Fig. 3): Rougher (R), Cleaner (C), two Cleaner-
Scavenger (CS1, CS2), two Scavenger-Cleaner (SC1, SC2), and two
the disjunction dv , where yVdv ;i is the binary variable that selects
Scavenger (S1, S2). The process was sampled five times, from
the disjunction, V dLOv and V dUPv are the boundaries of the linear equa- which the following values were determined: feed stream mass
i
tions and Vddv is the volume of the cell according to the disjunction. flow rate to the circuit, 71.2 t/h, and zinc feed grade, 6.95%. The
Using the convex hull method, Eq. (23) is represented by Eq. (24), number of cells considered at each stage is one for rougher and
Please cite this article in press as: Calisaya, D.A., et al. A strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits. Miner. Eng. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
6 D.A. Calisaya et al. / Minerals Engineering xxx (2016) xxxxxx
Table 2
Concentrate streams (X) and tail streams (O) allowed.
R C CS1 CS2 SC S1 S2 P W
R X O
C O O O X
CS1 X O X O X
CS2 X X O X O
SC X O O O X
S1 X X X O O
S2 X X X O
Table 1
Laboratory test conditions.
Please cite this article in press as: Calisaya, D.A., et al. A strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits. Miner. Eng. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
D.A. Calisaya et al. / Minerals Engineering xxx (2016) xxxxxx 7
Table 4
Kinetic constants obtained from experimental data and non-linear regression at the condition given in Table 1.
Stage Key Pb Zn Cu Fe
K f , h1 K s , h1 T1 K f , h1 K s , h1 T1 K f , h1 K s , h1 T1 K f , h1 K s , h1 T1
Rougher dr1 9.6 9.6 55.9 238.7 39.5 89.7 28.9 4.4 79.1 3.9 2.7 49.0
dr2 8.8 8.8 54.8 68.5 23.9 86.5 26.0 1.0 99.5 4.6 4.6 34.6
dr3 9.0 9.0 30.0 18.8 18.8 73.6 15.0 15.0 57.3 9.1 0.0 28.3
dr4 13.7 13.7 25.0 52.9 11.1 61.4 28.6 4.2 40.8 3.2 3.2 16.5
dr5 16.5 16.5 30.9 55.8 1.4 100.0 33.7 4.0 40.7 8.6 0.2 26.1
dr6 80.4 2.3 51.0 110.9 16.8 66.4 72.5 7.6 42.8 10.4 10.4 12.7
Scavenger ds1 7.6 7.6 44.7 191.0 31.6 71.8 23.1 3.5 63.3 3.1 2.1 39.2
ds2 7.1 7.1 43.8 54.8 19.1 69.2 20.8 0.8 79.6 3.7 3.7 27.7
ds3 7.2 7.2 24.0 15.0 15.0 58.9 12.0 12.0 45.8 7.3 0.0 22.7
ds4 11.0 11.0 20.0 42.3 8.9 49.1 22.8 3.3 32.6 2.6 2.6 13.2
ds5 13.2 13.2 24.7 44.6 1.1 80.0 26.9 3.2 32.6 6.9 0.1 20.9
ds6 64.3 1.9 40.8 88.8 13.5 53.1 58.0 6.1 34.2 8.3 8.3 10.1
Cleaner scavenger dcs1 112.4 5.0 9.9 161.5 1.7 12.8 150.1 5.2 9.6 15.1 15.1 7.3
dcs2 2.0 0.2 42.3 13.3 2.5 36.2 4.2 0.0 36.0 3.4 3.4 11.2
dcs3 11.6 2.1 16.1 15.0 2.6 46.0 5.3 5.3 21.5 6.4 6.4 8.9
dcs4 4.8 4.8 32.1 12.3 2.3 60.7 2.4 2.4 51.7 0.0 0.0 29.5
dcs5 11.0 11.0 24.2 52.4 9.2 26.5 11.3 11.3 22.7 10.6 0.0 30.6
dcs6 9.5 9.5 22.5 78.4 1.8 100.0 58.2 2.2 69.7 13.2 2.6 25.0
dcs7 9.0 9.0 25.6 186.2 25.2 69.7 97.6 3.3 47.9 24.3 3.6 18.6
dcs8 50.1 1.9 100.0 144.0 28.4 96.3 52.4 9.3 70.1 35.4 4.3 43.9
dc9 16.8 16.8 27.8 19.9 3.2 21.4 60.0 9.0 44.9 10.9 10.9 15.6
dc10 5.3 1.1 39.1 17.7 2.9 63.8 3.8 0.0 54.5 2.1 0.0 59.5
dc11 18.2 2.7 47.8 43.1 4.3 58.4 41.2 3.5 69.1 0.7 0.7 100.0
dc12 11.2 11.2 31.6 57.4 5.7 65.8 71.8 6.6 52.6 7.3 7.3 13.1
dc13 18.7 3.9 22.7 41.4 4.7 47.3 43.1 9.8 28.5 2.8 0.0 54.4
dc14 28.1 3.3 17.4 52.6 4.2 77.3 44.2 1.4 35.2 2.6 2.6 23.9
dc15 54.8 4.7 44.1 76.5 11.9 68.7 65.8 11.3 60.0 3.9 3.9 21.7
dc16 64.3 1.7 61.7 100.2 10.3 95.0 71.2 2.1 100.0 10.5 10.5 15.8
Scavenger cleaner dsc1 29.2 29.2 60.5 83.3 28.6 83.3 46.7 6.4 86.0 25.5 1.4 62.0
dsc2 35.8 35.8 53.2 46.3 46.3 79.1 38.9 38.9 68.4 26.5 0.0 59.5
dsc3 33.3 4.1 65.6 49.6 5.7 83.1 18.3 3.1 64.4 10.7 2.2 39.7
Cleaner dcs1 112.4 5.0 9.9 161.5 1.7 12.8 150.1 5.2 9.6 15.1 15.1 7.3
dcs2 2.0 0.2 42.3 13.3 2.5 36.2 4.2 0.0 36.0 3.4 3.4 11.2
dcs3 11.6 2.1 16.1 15.0 2.6 46.0 5.3 5.3 21.5 6.4 6.4 8.9
dcs4 4.8 4.8 32.1 12.3 2.3 60.7 2.4 2.4 51.7 0.0 0.0 29.5
dcs5 11.0 11.0 24.2 52.4 9.2 26.5 11.3 11.3 22.7 10.6 0.0 30.6
dcs6 9.5 9.5 22.5 78.4 1.8 100.0 58.2 2.2 69.7 13.2 2.6 25.0
dcs7 9.0 9.0 25.6 186.2 25.2 69.7 97.6 3.3 47.9 24.3 3.6 18.6
dcs8 50.1 1.9 100.0 144.0 28.4 96.3 52.4 9.3 70.1 35.4 4.3 43.9
dc9 16.8 16.8 27.8 19.9 3.2 21.4 60.0 9.0 44.9 10.9 10.9 15.6
dc10 5.3 1.1 39.1 17.7 2.9 63.8 3.8 0.0 54.5 2.1 0.0 59.5
dc11 18.2 2.7 47.8 43.1 4.3 58.4 41.2 3.5 69.1 0.7 0.7 100.0
dc12 11.2 11.2 31.6 57.4 5.7 65.8 71.8 6.6 52.6 7.3 7.3 13.1
dc13 18.7 3.9 22.7 41.4 4.7 47.3 43.1 9.8 28.5 2.8 0.0 54.4
dc14 28.1 3.3 17.4 52.6 4.2 77.3 44.2 1.4 35.2 2.6 2.6 23.9
dc15 54.8 4.7 44.1 76.5 11.9 68.7 65.8 11.3 60.0 3.9 3.9 21.7
dc16 64.3 1.7 61.7 100.2 10.3 95.0 71.2 2.1 100.0 10.5 10.5 15.8
Please cite this article in press as: Calisaya, D.A., et al. A strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits. Miner. Eng. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
8 D.A. Calisaya et al. / Minerals Engineering xxx (2016) xxxxxx
Fig. 4. Experimental data and model representation of Zn, Cu, Pb and Fe recovery at different conditions.
kinetic constants obtained. The fast fraction was determined by the loop on S2 concentrate, while one alternative avoids the loop on
fraction of particles between 74 and 10 lm. From the values shown CS2 concentrate. However, the alternatives identified also consider
in Table 4, it is clear that operational conditions can affect the val- three options to send the concentrate from stage S1 (stages CS1, SC,
ues of the kinetic model and, therefore, the recovery in each stage. and C) and two alternatives to send the tail from stage CS2. If only
For example, the maximum recovery of Pb changes from 9.9% to these alternatives are considered, and not all ones identified in
100% based on the operational conditions. The fit was generally Table 2, combinations deliver a total of 24 circuits. The sequential
very good, and Fig. 4 shows four examples for the recovery of Zn, simulation of these 24 alternatives is possible, but will require a
Cu, Pb and Fe under different conditions. More information on great effort when considering the operational conditions. For one
the experimental tests is found in Appendix A. In some cases the circuit the number of combinations of operating conditions is
fast and slow kinetic constants obtained have the same value, 2,654,208, based on the alternatives identified in Table 1. There-
which means that all particles sizes have similar behavior. fore, for 24 circuits there are 63,700,992 alternatives. The analysis
of all alternatives, using sequential simulation, is not possible. In
3.2.2. Step two: Optimization process fact, the optimization procedure has considered a total of
The procedure was realized using 46 initial residence times 30,958,682,112 alternatives when both the selection of operational
between 1.5 and 5.5 min. A set of five optimal flotation circuits condition and circuit structure are considered.
was identified, and for comparison, the problem was solved using Fig. 7 shows the flotation structure obtained based on the initial
the current circuit of the plant (the circuit configuration was fixed residence time. Alternative 5 was identified when low initial resi-
as shown in Fig. 2), but operational conditions were allowed to dence times were used in phase 1 of the optimization procedure.
change (we will call this result the mine solution). CPLEX and Alternative 4 was obtained when high residence times were used
BARON solvers were used for the MILP and MINLP respectively, in phase 1. The best option, alternative 1 was obtained using resi-
both were run using GAMS. The CPU time for each optimization dence times from 1.7 to 2.4 min and from 2.9 to 3.9 min. Alterna-
process described in Fig. 2 was about 2 using a laptop with an i7 tive 3 was identified for residence times between 2.5 and
processor and 8 GB of RAM. Fig. 5 shows the flotation circuit struc- 2.8 min. Finally, alternative 2 was identified for initial residence
tures obtained, where alternative 1 gives the best result, alterna- times of 45 min. The best operational conditions and cell design
tive 2 gives the second best results, etc. The NPVs for these were identified using initial residence time of 3.5, 4.0, 2.7, 5.1
alternatives are shown in Fig. 6. It is clear that alternatives 1, 2, 3 and 1.7 min for alternatives 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively.
and 4 give good results and can be considered for further study. The optimal metallurgical conditions are given in Table 5 and
Alternative 5 and the current plant structure give NPV on the order the optimal cell size and residence time in Table 6. The optimal
of 4000 MUS$ below alternative 1. It is important to remember metallurgical conditions are almost the same for all flotation struc-
that, based on Table 2, the total number of feasible flotation tures. That is, 50 scrapes per min and without frother for rougher
circuits is 11,664. Thus, the identification of only five flotation stage; 20 g xanthate/ t ore, 2 kg dispersant/t ore and with milling
structures after running the program is surprising but very consis- for cleaner stage; 20 g xanthate/ t ore, 2 kg dispersant/t ore and
tent with results obtained by Cisternas et al. (2015). without milling for cleaner scavenger 1 stage; 40 g xanthate/ t
It can be argued that the five circuit alternatives can be identi- ore, 2 kg dispersant/t ore and without milling for cleaner scavenger
fied based on experience. For example, all alternatives avoid the 2 stage; 40 g xanthate/ t ore, 2 kg dispersant/t ore for scavenger
Please cite this article in press as: Calisaya, D.A., et al. A strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits. Miner. Eng. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
D.A. Calisaya et al. / Minerals Engineering xxx (2016) xxxxxx 9
cleaner stage; and 50 scrapes per min and without frother for
Fig. 7. Zinc recovery and grade comparison between model and mine solutions.
scavenger 1 and 2 stages.
Fig. 8 compares the recovery and concentrate grades for all
alternatives. All the good alternatives, alternatives 1, 2, 3 and 4, Fig. 9 gives the operational cost for all alternatives. The differ-
have high values of recovery and concentrate grade. Alternative 5 ence between the highest and lowest operating costs is not very
has a high concentrate grade but a low recovery. On the other significant. If these costs are compared with revenue associated
hand, the current flotation circuit structure (mine) gives high with recovery and concentrate grade, it can be concluded that they
recovery but low concentrate grade. do not play a role in selecting the structure of the flotation circuit.
Please cite this article in press as: Calisaya, D.A., et al. A strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits. Miner. Eng. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
10 D.A. Calisaya et al. / Minerals Engineering xxx (2016) xxxxxx
Table 5
Optimal metallurgical conditions for mine and model (see Table 1 for description of the operational conditions).
Table 6
Volumes and residence times for mine and the alternatives.
Acknowledgements
Fig. 8. Representation of Zn recovery and grade for the mine and the alternatives.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
References
Abu-Ali, M.H., Sabour, S.A., 2003. Optimizing the design of flotation circuits: an
economic approach. Miner. Eng. 16 (1), 5558.
Cisternas, L.A., Glvez, E.D., Zavala, M.F., Magna, J., 2004. A MILP model for the
design of mineral flotation circuits. Int. J. Miner. Process. 74 (1), 121131.
Fig. 9. Operational cost for the mine and the alternatives.
Cisternas, L.A., Glvez, E.D., Jamett, N., 2015. Approximate recovery values for each
stage are sufficient to select the concentration circuit structures. Miner. Eng. 83,
175184.
Cisternas, L.A., Lucay, F., Glvez, E.D., 2014. Effect of the objective function in the
4. Conclusion design of concentration plants. Miner. Eng. 63, 1624.
Cisternas, L.A., Mndez, D.A., Glvez, E.D., Jorquera, R.E., 2006. A MILP model for
design of flotation circuits with bank/column and regrind/no regrind selection.
A strategy for the identification of a set of optimal flotation cir- Int. J. Miner. Process. 79 (4), 253263.
cuit was proposed based on laboratory tests and on the fact that Ghobadi, P., Yahyaei, M., Banisi, S., 2011. Optimization of the performance of
there are few flotation circuit structures that are optimal for a flotation circuits using a genetic algorithm oriented by process-based rules. Int.
J. Miner. Process. 98 (3), 174181.
given problem. The strategy uses two steps: first, kinetic models Gorain, B.K., Franzidis, J.P., Manlapig, E.V., 1997. Studies on impeller type, impeller
are developed for different operational conditions based on exper- speed and air flow rate in an industrial scale flotation cell. Part 4: Effect of
imental tests. Then, an optimization procedure is utilized for the bubble surface area flux on flotation performance. Miner. Eng. 10 (4), 367379.
Gorain, B.K., Napier-Munn, T.J., Franzidis, J.-P., Manlapig, E.V., 1998. Studies on
identification of circuit structure, operational conditions and cell
impeller type, impeller speed and air flow rate in an industrial scale flotation
design. The optimization procedure overcomes the difficulties of cell. Part 5: Validation of k-S-b relationship and effect of froth depth. Miner.
convergence that this type of problem presents. Eng. 11 (7), 615626.
A case study allowed the identification of only five flotation cir- Guria, C., Varma, M., Mehrotra, S.P., Gupta, S.K., 2006. Simultaneous optimization of
the performance of flotation circuits and their simplification using the jumping
cuit alternatives after running the optimization program 46 times gene adaptations of genetic algorithm-II: more complex problems. Int. J. Miner.
using different initial cell residence times. The Net Present Value Process. 79 (3), 149166.
Please cite this article in press as: Calisaya, D.A., et al. A strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits. Miner. Eng. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
D.A. Calisaya et al. / Minerals Engineering xxx (2016) xxxxxx 11
Guria, C., Verma, M., Gupta, S.K., Mehrotra, S.P., 2005. Simultaneous optimization of Montenegro, M.R., Seplveda, F.D., Glvez, E.D., Cisternas, L.A., 2013. Methodology
the performance of flotation circuits and their simplification using the jumping for process analysis and design with multiple objectives under uncertainty:
gene adaptations of genetic algorithm. Int. J. Miner. Process. 77 (3), 165185. application to flotation circuits. Int. J. Miner. Process. 118, 1527.
Hu, W., Hadler, K., Neethling, S.J., Cilliers, J.J., 2013. Determining flotation circuit Pirouzan, D., Yahyaei, M., Banisi, S., 2014. Pareto based optimization of flotation
layout using genetic algorithms with pulp and froth models. Chem. Eng. Sci. cells configuration using an oriented genetic algorithm. Int. J. Miner. Process.
102, 3241. 126, 107116.
Jamett, N., Cisternas, L.A., Vielma, J.P., 2015. Solution strategies to stochastic design Ruhmer, W.T., Freeman, M.J., De Bene, N.N., 1991. Handbook on the estimation of
of mineral flotation plants. Chem. Eng. Sci. 134 (29), 850860. metallurgical process costs, second ed. Mintek Special Publication No. 14.
Maldonado, M., Seguel, F., Soto, I., Krommenacker, N., Becerra Yoma, N., 2011. Savassi, O.N., Alexander, D.J., Franzidis, J.P., Manlapig, E.V., 1998. An empirical
Optimizing flotation bank performance by recovery profiling. Miner. Eng. 24 (8), model for entrainment in industrial flotation plants. Miner. Eng. 11 (3), 243
939943. 256.
Mndez, D.A., Glvez, E.D., Cisternas, L.A., 2009. Modeling of grinding and Schena, G., Zanin, M., Chiarandini, A., 1997. Procedures for the automatic design of
classification circuits as applied to the design of flotation processes. Comput. flotation networks. Int. J. Miner. Process. 52 (2), 137160.
Chem. Eng. 33 (1), 97111. Yianatos, J., Contreras, F., Morales, P., Coddou, F., Elgueta, H., Ortz, J., 2010. A novel
Montenegro, M.R., Glvez, E.D., Cisternas, L.A., 2015. The effects of stage recovery scale-up approach for mechanical flotation cells. Miner. Eng. 23 (1113), 877
uncertainty in the performance of concentration circuits. Int. J. Miner. Process. 884.
143, 1217.
Please cite this article in press as: Calisaya, D.A., et al. A strategy for the identification of optimal flotation circuits. Miner. Eng. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.mineng.2016.06.010
View publication stats