Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
It is likely that different managerial styles work best in different environments. What kind of
manager succeeds in your organization and which kind fails to thrive? Why?
The working styles of managers vary from person to person. One type of managerial style
may be suitable in one environment but may not be suitable in another different environment.
Organization should select a manager which suits in its environment (Bamber, Jiang, & Wang,
2010). For example, manager with democratic style will not work in a military organization.
Such organization will require directive style of management where the leader expects
There are six key management styles according to Hay-McBer which are as follows
(Cardinal, 2015):
1. Directive Style: Manager tells how to do a work, tightly controls staffs and uses negative
motivation such as disciplinary action. This type of managerial style is useful when there is
crisis such as wars, natural disasters, etc and when deviation from the standard practice is
2. Authoritative Style: Manager is fair enough and provides proper direction to employees.
He/she uses positive motivations such as rewards, feedback on performance, etc. This style is
useful when organization has clear vision and works are standardized. Manager should be
credible i.e. employees should trust him/her and employees should be competent enough for
3. Affiliative Style: This style gives importance to the employees over the work. It tries to
establish good relationship between employees and avoid conflicts at the work. It tries to
create happiness to motivate staffs. This style is used as supplementary to other styles, used
making. Peter Drucker pioneered in this style (Cherrington, 2012). This approach is useful in
organization such as Apple Inc. where employees work together to develop innovative new
products. The employees need to be skilled, talented and qualified for this style to be
5. Pacesetting Style: This style is used when accomplishing a job requires very high standard of
work. The leader himself/herself personally handles the tasks and leads by example. For
example, a leader of reputed law firm would handle high profile legal cases by himself as it
6. Coaching Style: This style is useful when the aim is to empower professional development of
staffs. It persuades the staffs to work out on their strengths so that their performance
increases. This is useful in sports organizations where the coach/managers help players to
enrich their skills. The leader needs to be expert in their related field. (Cardinal, 2015)
I work in one of the leading commercial bank in Nepal. I think authoritative management
style will be the best style suitable for my organization. The top management prepares the
strategy, mission and vision for the organization. This will clearly spell out the short term, mid-
term and long term goals and deliverables for the employees. The top management then allows
other line managers to play their role which will help in achieving the overall objectives of the
Bank. The Board and the top management steps in to remind the mission and vision of the Bank
and what is expected from the employees. The Bank recognizes the contribution of employees
and rewards them by financial and non financial incentives for their valuable contribution. This
style allows enough freedom for the competent, skilled and expert employees to contribute to
achieve overall objectives of the Bank. The line managers are credible hence employees work
happily under them. Hence, I think authoritative style is suitable for my organization (Bank).
References:
Bamber, L. S., Jiang, J., & Wang, I. Y. (2010). What's my style? The influence of top managers
Cardinal, R. (2015, March 15). 6 Management Styles and When to Use Them. Retrieved from
Individual and Organizational Performance. 2nd ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and
Bacon, 1994.