Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: A general model has been developed to suggest the transient responses of a plate heat exchanger. The
Received 22 April 2012 predicted and experimental step responses of the system have been analyzed using the frequency
Received in revised form 27 June 2012 response analysis. The results indicate that the system is represented by a rst order lag and dead time.
Accepted 29 June 2012
A closed t between the simulated and experimental data has been obtained.
Available online 23 July 2012
To verify the presented model, temperature control has been applied on the plate heat exchanger using
both conventional and fuzzy logic controllers. Results show that the performance of the fuzzy logic con-
Keywords:
troller produces transient responses with less settling time and less oscillatory behavior compared to that
Plate heat exchanger
Dynamic modeling
under the conventional controller. Comparisons between simulated and experimental responses indicate
Transient response that the developed model is capable of predicting the transient responses of the plate heat exchanger,
Fuzzy controller satisfactory.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0017-9310/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.06.094
6874 S.K. Al-Dawery et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 55 (2012) 68736880
Nomenclature
transfer coefcient. Tan et al. [12] have studied the use of articial temperature based on the steady-state analysis and the effects of
neural networks in order to simulate the thermal performance of a disturbances on the process temperatures. His results indicate that
plate heat exchanger with no suggested model or transfer function. the control based on a steady temperature is more effective and
Only a few researchers have focused on the control of heat could be very good for disturbance rejection and set point tracking.
transfer systems such as boiler and plate heat exchangers. Assilian It can be seen that the necessity for developing a general math-
and Mamdani [13] have realized that the fuzzy logic controller ematical model for plate heat exchangers is an important task for
could be used not only in the treatment of complex heuristic sys- the purpose of their control and their transient behavior. Thus,
tems, but it could also be applied to hard systems such as industrial the present work has been conducted to nd a general dynamic
plant controllers. In their report, small boiler steam engine control- model and a suitable control system for the plate heat exchanger
lers specifying heuristic fuzzy control rules for two feedback loops in order to enhance the research studies of the transient dynamics
have been implemented and the results have been compared with of such systems. Theoretical and experimental works will be car-
those of the Direct Digital Control for different set points. The re- ried out; transient responses of the plate heat exchanger will be
sults show that the quality of control with the fuzzy controller is investigated using frequency response analysis. In addition, one
better than that obtained by the xed controller. Kickert and Van of the goals is to maintain the outlet temperature of the cooling
Naute Lemke [14] have applied three types of fuzzy logic control- water in the plate heat exchanger using conventional and ad-
lers to the temperature control of a warm water plant and com- vanced control systems. The control systems applied are: PI, PID
pared the results with that under the conventional PI controller. and fuzzy logic controllers. The nal results of the performance
They used a continuous type membership functions to describe will be compared theoretically and experimentally.
the fuzzy sets. The process has properties that are difcult to con-
trol. These difculties arise from non symmetric behavior for heat- 2. Mathematical model formulation
ing and cooling, noise, dead time and the inuence of the ambient
temperature on behavior of the process. King and Mamdani [15] 2.1. Mathematical model of plate heat exchanger
have applied a temperature control using a fuzzy logic controller
on the boiler and stirred tank reactor. The formulating design rules Unsteady-state energy balances have been used as the basis for
of the fuzzy logic controller require some knowledge of the process the derivation of the mathematical model for the plate heat ex-
such as process delays, and speed and magnitude of responses. changer. Two approaches are possible to employ overall balances.
They concluded that processes could be controlled effectively using In rst approach, the overall heat transfer coefcient (U) is consid-
heuristic rules based on fuzzy statements and the results indicate ered to be constant and in the second approach, the overall heat
that the fuzzy control system is much less sensitive to process transfer coefcient is considered as a function of the hot stream
parameter changes and can give good control at all operating mass ow rate. Hence, in the latter instance, U is also considered
points. Morison [16] has proposed and tested a control algorithm as a function of time (i.e. U(t)).
that calculates the set point of the hot water temperature from Assuming U to be constant, the unsteady-state energy balance
the set point of pasteurization temperature and an average around the cold plate is given by:
S.K. Al-Dawery et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 55 (2012) 68736880 6875
dT co t K7 K8
m _
_ c C p T ci T co t mhtC p T hi T ho t M C C p 1 T ho s T co s _ h s
m 12
dt 1 sh s 1 sh s
and the unsteady-state energy balance around the hot plate is given where:
by: M C Q
sc _ c p ; K 5 _ and
dT ho t mc C p Q mc C p Q
_ h C p T hi T ho t m
m _ c tC p T ci T co t Mh C p 2 RT hi T ho T ci T co Mh C Q
dt K6 sh ; K7 and
_ c Cp Q
m mh C Q _ hCp Q
m
Linearization of the two equations above and transforming to _ bh
C p T hi T ho RT hi T ho T ci T co Zm
Laplace domain gives: K8 Q and
_ hCp Q
m _ b
amh c
K1 K2 Zc m _ b1
h
T co s _ h s
m T ho s 3 R
1 sc s 1 sc s amh c2
_ b
sc sh
_ c mh
m
As 1 K 2 K 4 1 m
_ T hi T ho
m
_ T hi T ho f
_ c 0, and K 1 K 2 K 3 0
h
_h m m_c _c
m m _h 2sc sh 1 K 5 K 7 1=2
Thus, Eq. (5) becomes: From the above mathematical derivation of the dynamic model
T co s K 1 sh K for the plate heat exchanger it can be seen that the system is rep-
Gs 6 resented by rst order lead and second order lag expression. Thus,
mh s sc sh s sc sh 1 sp s
the overall behavior of the plate heat exchangers would follow the
where: K sKc 1ssh and sp ssccssh responses of a rst order lag system.
h h
For the case when U is a function of time (i.e. U(t)), the unstea-
dy-state energy balance around the cold plate is given by:
2.2. Control system for plate heat exchanger
T T co t T ho t T ci
_ c C p T ci T co t AUt hi
m The conventional PID and fuzzy logic controllers have been
2 2
implemented for temperature control on the plate heat exchanger.
dT co t The mathematical representation of the PID controller is given by:
Mc C p 7
dt
Z
The resistance to heat transfer is considered by following formula 1 det
Pt Pss K C et etdt T D 13
[8]; TI dt
In P
Calculate Convert Evaluate Compute Out
change of to fuzzy fuzzy control
Process
error set control action
definition rules
form
TE AMP
TT PC
P
H
To the drain
E
TIC V/I
I/P APR
R1 R2
FCV
T100 T200
AP
P2
P1
Table 1
Description of the experimental rig.
200
8
180
T of cold water, C
A
6
160
Pressure, kpa
0.632A
140 4
100 % step change
% vs pressure+
% vs pressure- T = 8.37 (1-exp(-(t+5)/12.53)
120
2
100
0
80 0 20 40 60
0 20 40 60 80 100 Time, s
Stem position, %
Fig. 4. Temperature response for a 100% positive step in hot water feed ow rate,
Fig. 3. Input pressure versus valve opening (%). step introduced at time = 0.0.
6878 S.K. Al-Dawery et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 55 (2012) 68736880
10 200
8 100
of cold water, oC
Angle, rad
0
-
150% step change
4 -100
T = 8.46 (1-exp(-(t+5)/13.47) Frequency vs Angle
2 -200
0 -300
0 20 40 60 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1
Time, s
Fig. 5. Temperature response for a 50% negative step in cooling water feed ow Fig. 8. Bode plot of phase angle.
rate, step introduced at time = 0.0.
6 Table 3
Tuned parameters of PI and PID controller.
Controller parameters
5
Kc TI TD
PI 1.1 9
4
PID 1.8 10.3 1.7
T, oC
7
2
6
1
5
Response, oC
PI simu
0 4
PI real
0 20 40 60
3
Time, s
0
0
-1
-10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Log of modulus, BD
Time, s
-20
Fig. 9. Comparison between simulation and experimental responses of PI
controller.
-30
-40 20 dB. This result indicates that the model of the plate heat ex-
changer can be considered as a rst order lag. Since, the phase an-
-50 gle is pulled far away from 90o, it shows a clear embedded dead
time in the process. The analysis of the above result indicate that
-60 the transfer function representing the model of the plate heat ex-
0.01 0.1 1 10 changer can be written as:
, Rad/s
1:97e5s
Fig. 7. Bode plot of log of modulus. Gs
12:5s 1
The resultant frequency responses that have been calculated 4.2. Control of plate heat exchanger
using pulse test are shown in Figs. 7 and 8. These gures contain
Bode plot and phase angle respectively. From Bode plot, it can be Both experimental and simulation studies have been carried out
seen that the resultant slope at a high frequency is approximately to control the outlet temperature of the cooling water in the plate
S.K. Al-Dawery et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 55 (2012) 68736880 6879
4
PID simu
PID real
Response, oC
-2
-4
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Time, s
Fig. 12. Comparison between experimental temperature responses under PI, PID
Fig. 10. Comparison between simulation and experimental responses of PID
and fuzzy logic controller.
controller.
References [10] K.S. Das, A.K. Dwivedi, Dynamics of plate heat exchangers subject to ow
variations, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 50 (2007) 27332743.
[11] Y. Mahdi, A. Mouheb, L. Oufer, A dynamic model for milk fouling in a plate heat
[1] B.R. Lamb, Plate heat exchangers, a low cost route to heat recovery, J. Heat
exchanger, Appl. Math. Model. 33 (2009) 648662.
Recovery Syst. 2 (3) (1982) 247255.
[12] C.K. Tan, J. Ward, S.J. Wilcox, R. Payne, Articial neural network modeling of
[2] K. Aminian, L. English, D. Patchen, H. Siriwardane, Thermoacoustic liquefaction
the thermal performance of a compact heat exchanger, Appl. Thermal Eng. 29
of coal mine methane to produce LNG for heavy vehicle applications, U.S.
(2009) 36093617.
Department of Energy Report, Morgantown energy technology center, 1999.
[13] S. Assilian, E.H. Mamdani, An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy
[3] S. Lalot, G.R. Jonsson, O.P. Palsson, B. Desmet, Use of extended Kalman ltering
logic controller, Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 7 (1974) 113.
in detecting fouling in heat exchangers, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 50 (2007)
[14] W.J. Kickert, H.R. Van Naute Lemke, Application of a fuzzy controller in a
26432655.
warmwater plant, Automatica 12 (4) (1976) 301308.
[4] X. Ling, H. Peng, Optimal design approach for the plate-n heat exchangers
[15] P.J. King, E.H. Mamdani, The application of fuzzy control systems to industrial
using neural networks cooperated with genetic algorithms, Appl. Thermal Eng.
processes, Automatica 13 (3) (1977) 235245.
28 (2008) 642650.
[16] K.R. Morison, Steady state control of plate pasteurisers, Food Control 16 (1)
[5] M. Mishra, P.K. Das, S. Sarangi, Second law based optimisation of crossow
(2005) 2330.
plate-n heat exchanger design using genetic algorithm, Appl. Thermal Eng. 29
[17] D.F. Ahmed, S.K.H. Al-Dawery, H.A.O. Al-Anbari, On-line control of
(2009) 29832989.
neutralization process based on fuzzy logic, Emirates J. Eng. Res. 12 (2)
[6] C. Yang, L. Zhang, J. Zhou, A distributed parameter model and its application in
(2007) 8997.
optimizing the plate-n heat exchanger based on the minimum entropy
[18] K.M. Passino, S. Yurkovich, Fuzzy Control, Addison-Wesley, 1998.
generation, Int. J. Thermal Sci. 49 (2010) 14271436.
[19] S.K. Al-Dawery, Implantation of advanced control techniques on small
[7] A.J. Burns, Dynamic system, measurement and control, ASME 3 (1981).
computer, M.Phil Thesis, Nottingham University, UK, 1988.
[8] M. Ghanim, Dynamics of plate heat exchanger, M.Sc. Thesis, University of
[20] M.L. Luyben, W.L. Luyben, Essentials of Process Control, McGraw Hill, 1997.
Baghdad, Iraq, 1982.
[9] A.R. Khan, N.S. Baker, A.P. Wardle, The dynamic characteristics of a counter-
current plate heat exchanger, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 31 (6) (1988)
12691278.