Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
CHAPTER III
DISCUSSION
The use of self-collected samples for HPV testing has the potential to improve
reduce the burden of screening on the clinics, but literature on the acceptability of
could improve coverage rates by attracting women who would otherwise not
come because they refuse to get a Pap test. The simplicity of the instructions and
the collection procedure to obtain the vaginal sample make incorporation of this
technique into the current screening program highly feasible. The adjunct of self-
The results of the study indicate that self-collection for HPV testing is more
acceptable than the Pap test and that the distinction in test preference is
significant. Both the Pap test and selfsampling are acceptable to younger women.
privacy was always higher for the Pap test than for self-sampling. Embarrassment
proved to be the greatest obstacle to the acceptability of the Pap test and,
wealthier, and more educated women were more likely to be less embarrassed by
self-sampling than the Pap test. It is not surprising that embarrassment with the
17
Pap test increased with age. Older women have less experience with the Pap test
collected vaginal samples for high-risk HPV types detected as many cases of
high-grade SIL (CIN, 2-3) and invasive cervical cancer as did a conventional Pap
smear.9
Testing for HPV DNA by self-collected vaginal swabs at the time a woman
provides a routine urine sample would eliminate the need for a specu-lum
test. In addition to being used for HPV DNA testing, self-collected vagi-nal swabs
women as being high-risk for HPV does not guarantee that they will return for
screening using self-collected vaginal samples is that HPV DNA testing has a
lower specificity than cytologic screening and that the sensi-tivity of HPV DNA