opening scene 2 on each side

All rise! The Christian Court is now in session , Judge presiding.

the judge enters makes the announcement, proceed with the welcome and introduction.

Please be seated. Welcome to the Christian County Court. I am Judge ( ) and this a religious bench trial.

Call Case for Trial

Open the proceedings by stating:

The Court calls cause (plaintiffs name) versus (defendants name).

Is the plaintiff ready?
Is the defendant ready?

Both sides announce ready for trial

The judge asks the plaintiff : yes sir would u plz explain us the matter against the defender who was called
by you?

Plaintiff: I promise I would say nothing but the truth . (the defender) is teaching and shaking people belief
with the de Vince code saying that Jesus is nothing and the bible is just statements and not true

The judge : what does the defender say about that ?

The defender : your honor , I promise I would say the truth . yes what he is saying is true but if he has
anything else to make me false ! let him just say it.

Plaintiff - i would like to present your honor with these documents. these documents are historical scriptures
that were in several places in the world, in Vatican, Britain, Italy and Egypt.

The defender - how do u know that these scriptures are real and not forgue?

defender - according to the historian, the dates written matches the historical events that took place at that
time. secondly the stories were sequenced after each other in a perfect match as if the writer of the bible
was writing it as it was happening.

plaintiff- objection. the writer might have made up some stories and facts in the bible that never happened to
make Christians believe and Romans mouth shut. in addition, the scientists proved that all that was a
coincident, that some of the stories were sequenced
.
judge- what do you have to say against this accusation, this accusation is quit tuff?

defence- fabricated stories? Coincidence? well is it a coincident that those 4 gospels have eyewitnesses that
were not only Christians but other religions and they did want a specific idea to be delivered in a certain way.
Jesus is far bigger and more compelling than any of his witnesses. His reality stands behind these writings
as a great, global event stands behind a thousand newscasters.

plaintiff- well ! not bad what they included so far but what would they say about the skeptic believes of taking
bible literally that could be dangerous as many biblical statements mentioned.

defense- the reader should use common sense and think whether this action is appropriate or not..
moreover, the knowledge of language and grammar, and the techniques of hermeneutics to know the
difference and help me interpret the statements."

judge- what do the defense have to say about the details that was mentioned before.

defense- the 4 gospels are strongly detailed with information and they included so much specific details to
the point of humiliation that crosses the limits of weakness people might accept without judging this makes
people less likely to believe, specially Romans. eg. the verse which says "After that He appeared to more
than five hundred brethren at one time, most of whom remain until now, but some have fallen asleep" (1
Corinthians 15:6)
plaintiff- these details are not true as The Da vinci Code stated that many religious evidence were protected
by a secret society for almost 2000 years and they should come to light and it could rock the very
foundations of Christianity. According to the story, Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married, and she was
pregnant with His child when He was crucified. The apostles were jealous of Marys role among the group,
so she fled in fear to France where her descendants would eventually become French royalty. However, the
apostles changed Christs message so they could make the church patriarchal and suppress women. They
tried desperately to destroy any documents or evidence that went against their claims.

defense- Firstly The Da Vinci Code was published around fifteen years ago.