EDU5TEA Assessment 3: Lesson Plan Reflection 40% (1800-2000words) Name: Lejla Malic Grade: 33/40

TEA Marking Criteria A B C D U

Outstanding - Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory - Low pass Unsatisfactory

1. Copies of: - A lesson plan written and used by you 4 3 2 1 0

while on your Later Years placement; One sample Strongly meets and Soundly meets Meets requirements Meets basic requirements Does not meet
of student work from the lesson; Supervising exceeds requirements requirements requirements
teachers comments about the lesson using the All requirements included. Great online presentation. Detailed lesson plan.
specified pro forma; Written responses to the
Standards. /4
2. Standard 1: Know students and how they learn 12 10 8 6 0-5
(600 words) Strongly meets and Soundly meets Meets requirements Meets basic requirements Does not meet
Feedback from your supervisor outlining your capacity exceeds requirements requirements requirements
to engage students in effective learning; Clear analysis Great analysis of the students abilities based on their work and the work sample provided.
of student work sample indicating what they know, can A good discussion based on what youve learnt from the student sample in regards to what they need to
do and still need to know, in relation to the indicators
know; linked directly to the lesson plan in places.
from the lesson plan; Critical explanation of future
planning to address the students learning needs /12 Good recognition and explanation of future needs- further development of the teaching strategy used.
Reference to specific elements of Standard 1, curriculum documents or supporting readings would have been
good.
3. Standard 2: Know the content and how to teach it 12 10 8 6 0-5
(600 words) Strongly meets and Soundly meets Meets requirements Meets basic requirements Does not meet
Supervisor feedback from one lesson taught, with exceeds requirements requirements requirements
specific reference to knowledge of content and delivery Some interesting teaching strategies to engage students, including the group SWOT analysis, the use of
of content; Relevant description of how you student-centred language and relating the task to real life situations. Well done. A good response to the
demonstrated knowledge of content and how it could
knowledge of content and pedagogy, supported by further reading. Ideas for future improvements were
be developed; Relevant description of how you
demonstrated pedagogy and how it could be developed appropriate. Reference to Standard 2 focus points would have been good.
/12
4. Standard 3: Plan for and implement effective 12 9 8 6 0-5
teaching and learning (600 words) Strongly meets and Soundly meets Meets requirements Meets basic requirements Does not meet
A critical analysis of your lesson in regards to effective exceeds requirements requirements requirements
teaching and student learning; Concise explanation of A well-developed analysis of your lesson, and recognition of areas for improvement. Reference made to
how the student evidence demonstrates your capacity learning intentions being met; I would have liked a bit more depth in the area of your capacity to assess
to plan effective learning and your capacity to assess for
student learning in relation to the lesson.
effective learning and how these could be improved
/12 Reference further reading to support your work was excellent. I would have liked you to refer to Standard 3
focus points to support your analysis.
Demonstrates a high level of literacy, as expected in a professional document: Spelling, grammar and Pass Fail
referencing Resubmit