Attachment A 7-11-17

FILED
7-11-17
04:59 PM
ATTACHMENT A
A C D
Party&Contact Astatementofeachspecific Anexplanationofwhythe Abriefstatementofwhatthe CEQAIssue LegalIssue PreviouslyAddressed Comments
disputednonCEQA/NEPA issueismaterialorrequires partysproposedadditional
issueofmaterialfactoritem furtherevidence. testimonyontheissuewill
toaddressinfurther show.
evidentiaryhearings
(preciselywordedasthe
partyrecommendsitbe
statedinanyfurtherruling
settingthehearings).
California Updatedcostestimatesfor TheRulingstatesthat CalAmwillprovidetestimony Inresponsetothisproposed

AmericanWater theproject. updatedevidenceoncost updatingcostsforthe issue,CalAmreferstoits
Company;Sarah estimatesmaybeneeded. project. generalcommentsinSection
Leeper; Thismaybeduetothe IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
sarah.leeper@am passageoftimesincecosts Water'sCommentsonJoint
water.com;415 werelastupdated, StatementofIssues.
8632960 refinementoftheproject,
andtheissuanceofthePhase
1 2 Decision.
California Updatedfinancingdetailsfor TheRulingstatesthat CalAmwillprovidetestimony Inresponsetothisproposed
AmericanWater theproject. updatedevidenceon updatingfinancingdetailsfor issue,CalAmreferstoits
Company;Sarah financingdetailsmaybe theproject. generalcommentsinSection
Leeper; needed.Thismaybedueto IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
sarah.leeper@am thepassageoftimesince Water'sCommentsonJoint
water.com;415 financingdetailswerelast StatementofIssues.
8632960 updated,refinementofthe
project,andtheissuanceof
thePhase2Decision.
2
California Assessmentoftheforecast TheRulingstatesthat CalAmwillprovidetestimony Inresponsetothisproposed
AmericanWater demandthatbearsuponthe updatedevidenceonthe onupdatedforecastdemand issue,CalAmreferstoits
Company;Sarah justificationforandthesizing forecasteddemandmaybe numbers. generalcommentsinSection
Leeper; oftheMontereyPeninusal needed.Thismaybedueto IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
sarah.leeper@am WaterSupplyProject. thepassageoftimesince Water'sCommentsonJoint
water.com;415 financingdetailswerelast StatementofIssues.
8632960 updated,refinementofthe
project,andtheissuanceof
thePhase2Decision.
3
1
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
California Aprojectalternativethat TheRulingstatesthat CalAmwillprovidetestimony Inresponsetothisproposed

AmericanWater includesthedesalination evidenceonaproject onthecostanddesignissues issue,CalAmreferstoits
Company;Sarah plantengergizedbya alternativethatincludesthe associatedwiththisproject generalcommentsinSection
Leeper; combinationofpurchased desalinationplantengergized alternative. IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
sarah.leeper@am electricityandonsitesolar byacombinationof Water'sCommentsonJoint
water.com;415 panels. purchasedelectricityandon StatementofIssues.
8632960 sitesolarpanelisnecessary.
Thisoptionhasnotbeen
formallyaddressedinthis
proceeding.
4
California Thefeasibilityandcostsof TheRulingstatesthe CalAmwillprovidetestimony Inresponsetothisproposed
AmericanWater thedesalinationplantbeing evidenceonconstructionof onwhetherornotthis issue,CalAmreferstoits
Company;Sarah constructedinmodular thedesalinationplantin proposedalternativewould generalcommentsinSection
Leeper; increments,withthe modularincrementsis provideanysavingsor IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
sarah.leeper@am potentialfortheCommission necessary.Thisoptionhas efficienciestotheproject. Water'sCommentsonJoint
water.com;415 toauthorizeasmallerplant notbeenformallyaddressed StatementofIssues.
8632960 now(evensmallerthan6.4 inthisproceeding.
milliongallsonsperday,if
feasible)butwiththeoption
forapplicanttolaterrequest
authoritytoaddincrementsif
andasdemandincreases.
5
CitizensforJust NewAirborneElectro Groundwatermodelinginthe MCWDwouldbedirectedto Groundwatermodeling January13,2017AdministrativeLaw
Water,Margaret Magnetic(AEM)subsurface DEIRisinadequatetoprove presentitsnewAEMdatato pertainstoenvironmental Judge'sRulingProvidingGuidanceto
AnneCoppernoll imagingdataisavailableto "noharm"andAEMprovides showlocationsoffresh analysisofprojectimpactsto CitizensforJustWaterConcerningParty
Ph.D.,ph.831578 evaluategroundwater significantnewbaseline water,saltwaterintrusion groundwaterresources.See Status.("'JustWater,andallParties,are
7877 resources,includingfresh informationtotestthe andpermeabilitybetween DEIR/DEISChapter4.4. remindedthattheappropriateplaceto
waterreservesandsaltwater accuracyofthecurrent aquifers.CalAmneedsto Commentwassubmitted critiquethedraft[EIR/EIS]isin
intrusion. model. incorporatethisvaluabledata duringpubliccomment commentsonthe[draftEIR/EIS].'(May
intoananalysisoftheSalinas period;ESAisaddressing. 30,2013Rulingat5.))"
ValleyGroundwaterBasin.
6
2
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
CitizensforJust TheMontereyPeninsula ThisProjectnegatively CPUCmustrequiremore Accuracyofproject AssignedCommissioner'sRuling

Water WaterSupplyProject impactsthegroundwaterof researchontheharmand descriptionforpurposesof DirectingCaliforniaAmericanWater
(Project)descriptionis Marinaandharmsthesole impactstotheSalinasValley environmentalanalysisis CompanytoAmendApplicationwith
fundamentally sourceofpublicwaterto GroundwaterBasinbecause basicCEQAissue,see NewProjectDescription,February22,
misrepresented,deceiving, citizens. theProjectisaground DEIR/DEISchapter3. 2016;AmendedApplicationfiledMarch
andmisleadsthepublicintoa waterintakeproject. Groundwatermodeling 14,2016.
beliefthatitisasubsurface pertainstoenvironmental
oceanintake. analysisofprojectimpactsto
groundwaterresources.See
7 DEIR/DEIS Chapter 4 4
CitizensforJust CalAmhasnowaterrightsin TheProjectisnotfeasible Thereshouldbenoapproval Thisisalegalissueforwhich WaterRightswerepreviouslyaddressed.
Water theSalinasValley withoutlegalwaterrights. fortheDEIRuntillegalwater noevidenceortestimonyis SeeAdministrativeLawJudgeRuling,
GroundwaterBasin. rightsforthisProjecthave required.Seealso(RT,Dec. June1,2012(seekingbriefingonwater
beenresolved.Certification 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. rights);DecisionDeclaringPreemption
forasmallerdesalination [Iwantyoutoallremain ofCountyOrdinanceandtheExerciseof
projectandanymodular mindfulthatthehearings ParamountJurisdiction,October25,
componentscannotbe reallypertaintofactsand 2012;EvidentiaryHearingsApril2013
approveduntiltheissueof factualissue,notlawand
waterrightshasbeenlegally policy,whichyouwillhave
established. theopportunitytobrief
later.])
8
CitizensforJust TheMontereyPeninsula WaterfromourSalinasValley CalAmmustshowhowthis Thisisalegalissueforwhich WaterRightswerepreviouslyaddressed.
Water WaterSupplyProjectviolates GroundwaterBasincannotbe Projectcanbeapproved noevidenceortestimonyis SeeAdministrativeLawJudgeRuling,
stateandfederalground exportedtothePeninsula, whenitviolatesrelevantlaws required.SeealsoRT,Dec. June1,2012(seekingbriefingonwater
waterlawsandagreements. norcanreturnwaterbe regardingexportofground 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. rights);DecisionDeclaringPreemption
exportedandsoldto water.CPUCmustensure ofCountyOrdinanceandtheExerciseof
Castroville. conformancetoallrelevant ParamountJurisdiction,October25,
lawsregardingtheexportof 2012;EvidentiaryHearingsApril2013.
groundwater.
3
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
CitizensforJust TheMontereyPeninsula MarinaandFormerFortOrd CalAmmustevaluateand SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Thisisalegalissueforwhich Waterdemandwaspreviously

Water WaterSupplyProject landsgrowtharedependent documentcurrentandfuture existingusers(DEIR/DEIS noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeHearingsonPhase1
disregardscurrentandfuture onthegroundwater waterdemandneedsin Chapter4.4.5.2) required.SeealsoRT,Dec. IssuesApril2013;EvidentiaryHearings
waterdemandsofthe allocationsandavailabilityof
MarinaandOrdlands 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. April2016.
citizensoftheCityofMarina waterforcurrentandfuture mirroringthedetailed
andtheOrdCommunities. developments. analysesprovidedforthe
Peninsularesidentsinthe
10 DEIR.
CitizensforJust TheMontereyPeninsula Theregionalburdensmustbe CPUCmustgiveadded SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Thisisalegalissueforwhich Communityvalueswerepreviously
Water WaterSupplyProject sharedfortruecivicequity. considerationsforthe groundwaterresources noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeEvidentiaryHearings
deprivesthecitizensofthe Marinaiscurrentlyhometo Peninsulaneedstolocations (Chapter4);Environmental required.SeealsoRT,Dec. April2013.
CityofMarinadue boththeMontereyRegional otherthanMarina.Thetwo Justice(Chapter4.20,Impact 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14.
considerationforcivicequity WasteManagementDistrict otherviabledirectocean 4.202).
betweenmunicipalities. (landfill)andtheMonterey uptakedesalinationprojects
RegionalPollutionControl thatarebeingconsideredare
Agency(sewagetreatment) crediblealternativesthatdo
thatservesthePeninsula. notusepreciousground
Ourcommunitywillbearall waterfromourregion.
therisksandconsequences,
andwillreceivenobenefits
fromtheMontereyPeninsula
WaterSupplyProject.
11
CitizensforJust TheMontereyPeninsula Recentwidespreadprotest TheProjectcannotbe ImpactstoLandUse,Land Thisisalegalissueforwhich Communityvalueswerepreviously
Water WaterSupplyProjectwill againsttheCEMEXsand approvedwhilethereare UsePlanning,andRecreation noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeEvidentiaryHearings
createlongtermharmto miningplantshowspublic pendinglegalchallengesfrom analyzedinDEIR/DEIS required.SeealsoRT,Dec. April2013.
communityvalues, outrageoveranindustrial stateandlocalgovernmental Chapter4.8;Aesthetic 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14.
recreation,andqualityoflife projectnegativelyimpacting agenciesontheCEMEX resourcesanalyzedin
ofthecitizensoftheCityof thecoastline.Our property.Theindustrial Chapter4.14.
Marina,theOrd communitydoesnotneed natureoftheMonterey
Communities,andMonterey anotherdisruptiveharmful PeninsulaWaterSupply
Baycoastalcities. industrialprojectinitsplace. Projectmayconflictwiththe
Thistypeof desiresoftheentire
commercial/industrialuse MontereyBaycommunityfor
posesaviolationoftheCity thepreservationofopen
ofMarinasLocalCoastalPlan spacealongacherished
(LCP). NationalMarineSanctuary.
12
4
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
CitizensforJust The"Project"willcreatelong Economicrecoveryforthe CalAmtoprovidetestimony TrafficandTransportation

Water,Margaret termeconomicharmtothe CityofMarinahasbeen onspecificmonetaryadverse impactsfromconstructionof
AnneCoppernoll, citizensoftheCityofMarina, elusiveinthewakeofthe impactstotheCityofMarina projectanalyzedinDEIR/DEIS
Ph.D.,ph.831578 andtheOrdCommunities. 1995FortOrdBaseclosure mentionedintheDEIRbut Chapter4.9
7877;email: andthe2008Great notaccuratelyassessed.
mcopperma@aol.c Recession.Allplanned Whataretheadverse
om economicdevelopmentcame economicimpactsonthe
toanabruptstopwithbase smallbusinesscommunity
closuresandresulting thatwillexperiencea
populationdeclines.Small reducedcustomerbase,and
businesseswithnarrow ontaxpayerswhowill
marginswillnotwithstand shouldertheburdenof
twoyearsofdecreased infrastructuremaintenance
business,andthusbeatrisk andrepair?
forbankruptcy.TheCityof
Marinaiscurrentlystruggling
withfundingforbasicrepairs
tocitystreets.
13
5
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
CityofMarina; Whatisthetruewater Acurrentandobjective CalAm'stotalexisting TheAdministrativeLawJudge'sRuling

LayneP.Long; demandfortheProject? assessmentofthetruewater customerwaterdemandis RequestingPartiestoIdentifyIssuesfor
llong@cityofmarin demandiscriticaltoestablish approximately9,500afyand FurtherEvidentiaryHearings("Ruling")
a.org;(831)884 accurateProjectsizingandto steadilydeclining.CalAm alreadyrequestsupdatedevidenceon
1278 identifyProjectalternatives, expectsapproximately6,000 theforecasteddemand.
includingthosethatdonot afyeachyearinthefuture
involveadesalinationplant. fromothersourcesand
shouldhaveapproximately
3,500afyavailablefromPure
WaterMonterey.Thereisa
seriousquestionasto
whetheranywaterisneeded
fromadesalinationproject.
CalAmshouldprovide
testimonyregarding
customerwaterdemandand
supply.
14
CityofMarina; Whatisareasonablerangeof AreasonablerangeofProject Therearereasonableand Projectalternativesanalyzed
LayneP.Long; smallalternativesforthe alternativesmustbe significantlysmaller inDEIR/DEIS.Adequacyof
llong@cityofmarin Project? calibratedtoCalAm'strue alternativesforthisproject, alternativesisalegalissue
a.org;(831)884 Projectdemand,which includingthosethatdonot analyzedunderCEQA.
1278 appearstobesubstantially involveadesalinationplant.
lessthanpreviouslybelieved. CalAmandotherinterested
partiesshouldprovide
testimonyonthisissue.
15
6
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
CityofMarina; CanCalAmshowthatthe Thisisathresholdfeasibility ItappearsthatCalAmhasno Thisisalegalissueforwhich WaterRightswerepreviouslyaddressed.

LayneP.Long; Projectisfeasibleby issuethatfundamentally currentgroundwater noevidenceortestimonyis SeeAdministrativeLawJudgeRuling,
llong@cityofmarin demonstratingthatithas affectsthesize,location, extractionrightsintheBasin required.SeealsoRT,Dec. June1,2012(seekingbriefingonwater
a.org;(831)884 waterrightstoextract watersourceandviabilityof andnoconfirmedandfully 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. rights);DecisionDeclaringPreemption
1278 groundwaterfromtheSalinas theProjectthatmustbe viablepathforwardtoobtain ofCountyOrdinanceandtheExerciseof
ValleyGroundwaterBasin factuallyassessed. suchrights.CalAmshould ParamountJurisdiction,October25,
(Basin)? providetestimonytocarryits 2012;HearingsonPhaseIIssuesApril
burdenonthisfeasibility 2013
issue.Marinawilllikely
presentexpertandother
16
CityofMarina; CanCalAmshowthatthe Thisissueismaterialbecause ItappearsthattheProject's Thisisalegalissueforwhich Returnwaterissueswerepreviously
LayneP.Long; Projectisfeasiblegiventhe theselegalimpedimentswill plannedgroundwater noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013andApril
llong@cityofmarin directlegalprohibitionson maketheProjectinfeasible. extractionfromtheBasin required.SeealsoRT,Dec. 2016EvidentiaryHearings.Seealso
a.org;(831)884 appropriatingandexporting directlyviolatestheselaws. 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. AdministrativeLawJudge'sRuling
1278 groundwaterinthisparticular CalAmshouldprovide SettingEvidentiaryIssuesandSchedule
Basin? testimonytocarryitsburden toCompletetheRecordforPhases1and
onthisfeasibilityissue. 2,November17,2015,pp.78.
Marinawilllikelypresent
expertandothertestimony
onthisissue.
17
CityofMarina; CanCalAmdemonstratethat IfthenewSGMA Giventhehighcurrentand Thisisalegalissueforwhich
LayneP.Long; theProjectisfeasiblegiven developmentswilllikely expectedfutureBasinwater noevidenceortestimonyis
llong@cityofmarin enactmentofthenew resultinasignificant demands,itappears required.SeealsoRT,Dec.
a.org;(831)884 SustainableGroundwater limitationorprohibitionon extremelyunlikelythatthis 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14.It
1278 ManagementActandthe theplannedProject newgroundwaterextraction isprematuretomake
subsequentdesignationof groundwaterextractions,the willbeallowedunderSGMA. comparisonsor
theBasinas"critically Projectwouldnotbefeasible. CalAmshouldprovide measurementsforimpacts
overdrafted,"whichis testimonytocarryitsburden becauseimplementationof
resultinginexpedited onthisfeasibilityissue. SGMAisonlynowbeginning.
managementunderSGMA? Marinawilllikelypresent
expertandothertestimony
onthisissue.
18
7
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
CityofMarina; Whatquantityof Thisissuehasnotbeen TheamountofBasin SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously

LayneP.Long; groundwaterwillCalAm examinedsincethenew groundwaterthatwouldbe groundwaterresources noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
llong@cityofmarin extractgiventhelatest locationandscientific extractedhasbeen (Chapter4) required.SeealsoRT,Dec. Hearings;April2016Evidentiary
a.org;(831)884 Projectlocation,watersource informationandmodelshave significantlyunderstated. 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
1278 andscientificresearchdata? becomeavailable. CalAmshouldprovide Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
testimonytocarryitsburden andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
onthisfeasibilityissue. forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
Marinawillpresentexpert pp.78("TherecordontheBasin
andothertestimonyonthis impact/returnwaterissuewillbeclosed
issue. attheconclusionofthePhase1
evidentiaryphase(absentacompelling
motiontosetasidesubmissionand
reopentherecordonthatissue).The
recordontheBasinimpact/returnwater
issuewillnotbereopenedbasedonnew
informationintheupcoming
recirculationoftheDEIR.Partiesmust
addressenvironmentalimpactissuesin
commentsontheDEIR.)
19
CityofMarina; CanCalAmdemonstratethat Nogroundwaterextraction Itappearsthatarangeof Seeharmtoexistingusers Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously
LayneP.Long; theProjectwillnotcause rightcouldeverbe suchinjurieswilllikelyoccur (DEIR/DEISChapter4.4.5.2). noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
llong@cityofmarin injurytocurrentandfuture establishedifsuchinjury undercurrentProjectplans. required.SeealsoRT,Dec. Hearings;April2016Evidentiary
a.org;(831)884 Basingroundwaterusersasa couldoccurtoBasin CalAmshouldprovide 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
1278 resultofgroundwater groundwaterusers. testimonytocarryitsburden Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
depletion,seawaterintrusion onthisfeasibilityissue. andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
impacts,waterstorage Marinawillpresentexpert forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
interferenceorother andothertestimonyonthis pp.78.
potentialimpacts? issue.
20
8
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
CityofMarina; Whatarethetrackrecord, Thesekeyfactorsare Theslantwelltechnologyis Slanttechnologyandoperationofa

LayneP.Long; performance,feasibilityand materialindetermining new,hasnotrackrecordand desalinationplantusingslantwell
llong@cityofmarin costsofthenewand Projectfeasibilityand isnotcurrentlyusedinany technologywerepreviouslyaddressed.
a.org;(831)884 unprovenslantwell appropriatealternatives. commercialdesalination SeeApril2013EvidentiaryHearings;
1278 technology,andinwhat plantintheworld.CalAm April2016EvidentiaryHearings.
coastallocationswithinthe shouldprovidetestimonyon
CalAmcustomerservicearea thisissue.
couldtheybeinstalled?
21
CityofMarina; Whatarethefulladverseand TheCPUCislegallyrequired TheCityofMarinawould SeeDEIR/DEIS
LayneP.Long; disproportionateimpactsof toassessthepotential bearahugedisproportionate Socioeconomicand
llong@cityofmarin theProjectonminorityand disproportionateimpactsof andunfairshareofProject EnvironmentalJustice
a.org;(831)884 lowincomecommunities theProjectoncommunities burdens,withnobenefit,and (Chapter4.20,Impact4.20
1278 suchastheCityofMarina? suchasMarina. thisfactualanalysisis 2).
necessarytoformulateand
selectamongProject
alternatives.Marinawill
presentexpertandother
22
LandWatch Thetimingandsizingofthe Ifadditionalrecycledwater CAW,MontereyPeninsual Inresponsetothisproposed
MontereyCounty; proposeddesalinationfacility canbeprovidedtoCAW,that WaterManagementDistrict, issue,CalAmreferstoits
JohnFarrow; shouldbeadjustedto wouldcouldreducethe andMontereyRegional generalcommentsinSection
jfarrow@mrwolfea accommodatepotential requiredcapacityforthe WaterPollutionControl IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
ssociates.com;415 expansionofthePureWater desalinationproject.IfPure Agencyshouldberequested Water'sCommentsonJoint
3699400; Montereywaterrecycling WaterMontereycanprovide toprovideinformationon StatementofIssues.
Planningand projecttoprovideCAW additionalcapacitysooner whethermorethan3,500
Conservation greaterthan3,500acrefeet thanthedesalinationfacility, acrefeetannuallycouldbe
League;Jonas annually. impactstotheCarmelRiver providedfromthePure
Minton; couldbereducedsoonerand WaterMontereyprojectto
jminton@pcl.org; CAWcouldgetinto CAW.Ifso,information
(916)7194049 complaincewiththeCDO shouldbepresentedabout
sooner. theamount,timing,andcost
ofincreaseddeliveriesfrom
PureWaterMonterey.
23
9
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast Demand:WhatisCAW's TheCommissionmayonly CAWwouldbeaskedto TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

WaterDistrict; currentannualdemand approvetheMPWSPifitis providesworntestimonyas evidenceontheforecasteddemand.
MarkFogelman volumeforitsMonterey showntobenecessaryto toitscurrentannualdemand
andRuthStoner District,inAFYandMGD? ensureCAW'sabilityto volume
Muzzin; satisfyheneedsofitsexisting
mfogelman@fried customers.
manspring.com;
rmuzzin@friedma
nspring.com;(415)
24 8343800
MarinaCoast Demand:Howmuchof Nonrevenuevolume CAWwouldbeaskedto Nonrevenuewaterwaspreviously
WaterDistrict; CAW'scurrentannual contributestooverall providesworntestimonyas addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
MarkFogelman demandvolumeisnon demandvolumeand/or, toitscurrentandprojected Hearings.
andRuthStoner revenuewater,andwhatare alternatively,reduces volumeandcategoriesofnon
Muzzin; thepercentagesofnon availablesupplyforCAW's revenueproduction,
mfogelman@fried revenuewaterattributableto customers. includingitsplanand
manspring.com; categoriesof(a)leaksand(b) projectionforcontinuingto
rmuzzin@friedma firefighting,repairs, reducesystemleaksand
nspring.com;(415) maintenanceandother othernonrevenuevolumes
8343800 necessaryuses? inthefuture.
25
MarinaCoast Demand:Whatisan ProjectedLORvolume CAW,MPWMDandother TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated
WaterDistrict; accurateandrealistic contributestooverall partieswithsuchinformation evidenceontheforecasteddemand.
MarkFogelman projectionofdemandvolume demandvolumeforfuture wouldbeaskedtoprovide
andRuthStoner asof2017forLotsofRecord years sworntestimonyastoan
Muzzin; (LOR)? accurateandrealistic
mfogelman@fried projectionofLORdemand
manspring.com;
rmuzzin@friedma
nspring.com;(415)
26 8343800
10
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast Demand:Whatisan ProjectedPBvolume CAW,MPWMDandother TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

WaterDistrict; accurateandrealistic contributestooverall partieswithsuchinformation evidenceontheforecasteddemand.
MarkFogelman projectionofdemandvolume demandvolumeforfuture wouldbeaskedtoprovide
andRuthStoner asof2017forthePebble years sworntestimonyastoan
Muzzin; Beach(PB)allotments? accurateandrealistic
mfogelman@fried projectionofPBdemand
manspring.com;
rmuzzin@friedma
nspring.com;(415)
27 8343800
MarinaCoast Demand:Whatisan Additionaltourismdemand,if CAW,MPWMDandother TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated
WaterDistrict; accurateandrealistic realisticallyexpected,would partieswithsuchinformation evidenceontheforecasteddemand.
MarkFogelman projectionasof2017of contributetooveralldemand wouldbeaskedtoprovide Tourism"bounceback"waspreviously
andRuthStoner demandvolume,ifany,for volumeforfutureyears sworntestimonyastoan addressedintheApril2013Evidentiary
Muzzin; thepurported"tourism accurateandrealistic Hearings.
mfogelman@fried bounceback"afterthe2008 projectionofPBdemand
manspring.com; economicdownturn?
rmuzzin@friedma
nspring.com;(415)
28 8343800
MarinaCoast Supply:Whatisthevolume TheCommissionmayonly CAW,MPWMDandother Theabilityoffuturesupply TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated
WaterDistrict; ofCAW'sexistingandalready approvetheMPWSPifitis partieswithsuchinformation alternativestomeetproject evidenceontheforecasteddemand,and
MarkFogelman approvedsupplysourcesfor necessarytoensureCAW's wouldbeaskedtoprovide objectivesanalyzedin historicallywhentheCommissionhas
andRuthStoner itsMontereyDistrict,pre abilitytosatisfyitsexisting sworntestimonyastoCAW's DEIR/DEIS. addresseddemandithasalso
Muzzin; andpostDecember31, customers'needs. existingandalready consideredsupplyissues.
mfogelman@fried 2021? approvedsupplysourcesfor
manspring.com; itsMontereyDistrict,pre
rmuzzin@friedma andpostDecember31,2021.
nspring.com;(415)
29 8343800
11
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast Supply:Consideringthe TheCommissionmayonly CAW,MPWMDandother TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

WaterDistrict; answerstoMCWD's approvetheMPWSPifitis partieswithsuchinformation evidenceontheforecasteddemand.
MarkFogelman foregoingdemandandsupply necessarytoensureCAW's wouldbeaskedtoprovide
andRuthStoner questions,andallowingfor abilitytosatisfyitsexisting sworntestimonyastotheir
Muzzin; peakdemandperiod customers'needs. viewsontheshortfall,ifany,
mfogelman@fried coverage(whichCAWhas inCAW'ssupplysourcesfor
manspring.com; alreadytestifiedexistsforits itsMontereyDistrictpost
rmuzzin@friedma currentdemandvolume), 2021andwithoutthe
nspring.com;(415) whatwillbetheamount,if MPWSP.
8343800 any,ofCAW'ssupplyshortfall
withouttheMPWSPon
January1,2022?
30
MarinaCoast SupplyandProjectCost: Ifalternatesourcescan CAW,MPWMD,MRWPCA, Projectalternativesanalyzed
WaterDistrict; Shouldadesalinationproject providesufficientsupplyto ORAandotherpartieswith inDEIR/DEIS.Adequacyof
MarkFogelman operating24/7,365daysper CAWthatcouldsignificantly informationrelativetosizing alternativesisalegalissue
andRuthStoner year,andwithareturnwater reducethecapacityor andsourceprioritieswould analyzedunderCEQA.
Muzzin; obligation,besizedbasedon perhapseliminatetheneed beaskedtoprovidesworn
mfogelman@fried annualdemandtosatisfy12 fordesalinationaltogether, testimonyonthecostand
manspring.com; peakdemandmonths(which thereisnoneedforthis prudencyofoperatinga
rmuzzin@friedma sizingwouldbeunnecessary project desalinationproject24/7,
nspring.com;(415) andwastefulinmonthsin 365daysperyear,inlightof
8343800 whichpeakdemanddoesnot currentdemandandsupply
exist),orshouldperiodsof information.
peakdemandbesatisfiedby
utilizingGWR,ASRorother
sourcesand/orothernon
desalinationwatersupply
projects,asneeded?
31
12
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast Supply:IfCAWwill TheCommissionmayonly CAWandMPWMDwouldbe Projectalternativesanalyzed

WaterDistrict; experienceasupplyshortfall approvetheproposed6.4or askedtoprovidesworn inDEIR/DEIS.Adequacyof
MarkFogelman onJanuary1,2022,whatare 9.6mgdMPWSPifitis testimonyastotheirviews alternativesisalegalissue
andRuthStoner thereasonablealternatives necessarytoensureCAW's ontheappropriatesizefor analyzedunderCEQA.
Muzzin; fordesalinationprojectsize? abilitytosatisfyitsexisting theMPWSP
mfogelman@fried customers'needs
manspring.com;
rmuzzin@friedma
nspring.com;(415)
32 8343800
MarinaCoast Supply:IfCAWwill TheCommissionmust MCWDwillpresentupdated Adequacyofalternativesisa Thisisalegalissueforwhich Intakewelllocationswerepreviously
WaterDistrict; experienceasupplyshortfall considerallfeasiblelocations swornexperttestimonyand legalissueanalyzedunder noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
MarkFogelman onJanuary1,2022,whatare fordesalinationintake,soas recentscientificresearch CEQA. required.SeealsoRT,Dec. Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
andRuthStoner thereasonablealternatives toavoidunmitigableharmto concerningtheproposed 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
Muzzin; fordesalinationproject groundwaterconditions, locationforMPWSP andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
mfogelman@fried intakelocationsthatwill aquifers,andusersinthe desalinationintakewells forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
manspring.com; resultintheleastdamageto vicinityoftheproposed pp.78
rmuzzin@friedma theSalinasRiver CEMEXprojectintakesite.
nspring.com;(415) GroundwaterBasin,including
8343800 theaquifersunderlyingandin
thevicinityoftheproposed
CEMEXprojectsite,aswellas
theMontereyBayNational
MarineSanctuary?
33
13
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast Supply:IfCAWwill TheCommissionmust MCWDwillpresentsworn Adequacyofalternativesisa Thisisalegalissueforwhich Intakewelltechnologywaspreviously

WaterDistrict; experienceasupplyshortfall considerallfeasible experttestimonyconcerning legalissueanalyzedunder noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
MarkFogelman onJanuary1,2022,whatare technologiesfordesalination viablealternativeintake CEQA. required.SeealsoRT,Dec. Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
andRuthStoner thereasonablealternatives intake. technologiesfordesalination 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
Muzzin; fordesalinationproject andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
mfogelman@fried intaketechnologiesthatwill forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
manspring.com; resultintheleastdamageto pp.78
rmuzzin@friedma theSalinasRiver
nspring.com;(415) GroundwaterBasin,
8343800 includingtheaquifers
underlyingandinthevicinity
oftheproposedCEMEX
projectsite,aswellasthe
MontereyBayNational
MarineSanctuary?
34
MarinaCoast Supply:Whatarethe TheCommissionmust MCWDwillpresentsworn Adequacyofalternativesisa Thisisalegalissueforwhich
WaterDistrict; feasibleprojectalternativeto considerallpotentially testimonyconcerningthe legalissueanalyzedunder noevidenceortestimonyis
MarkFogelman theMPWSPthatwould competing,mutually readinessandfeasibilityof CEQA. required.SeealsoRT,Dec.
andRuthStoner provideCAWwiththetotal exclusiveandfeasible severalsupplyalternatives 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14.
Muzzin; supplyportfolionecessaryto projectsthatcouldsatisfy forCAWtopurchasewaterin
mfogelman@fried serveitsMontereyDistrict demand,underthedoctrine volumesrangingbetween
manspring.com; post2021?Or,areanyorall ofAshbackerRadioCorp.v. 500and700AFYofpotable
rmuzzin@friedma ofthefollowingalternatives FCC? waterfromvarioussources
nspring.com;(415) feasible,andifsowhat availabletoMCWD.Other
8343800 volumeofsupplywouldthey partiesshouldbepermitted
provide? topresentevidenceofother
AdditionalASRsupply smallwatersupplyprojects
Additionalgroundwater thatmayobviateanyneed
supplysources fortheMPWSPandbetter
Additionalsurfacewater servethepublicinterest.
supplysources
AdditionalGWR/Pure
35
Monterey supply
14
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:Willthe IftheMPWSPasproposedis MCWDwillpresentupdated SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Basinimpactswerepreviously

WaterDistrict; MPWSP,asproposed,impair notlegallyfeasible,the swornexperttestimonyand groundwaterresources addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
MarkFogelman groundwatervolumeinthe Commissionmaynotapprove recentscientificresearch (Chapter4). Hearings;April2016Evidentiary
andRuthStoner projectarea? theproject. concerningthelikelyadverse Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
Muzzin; impactofMPWSP Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
mfogelman@fried desalinationintakewellson andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
manspring.com; groundwaterintheproject forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
rmuzzin@friedma area pp.78.
nspring.com;(415)
36 8343800
MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:willthe IftheMPWSPasproposedis MCWDwillpresentupdated SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously
WaterDistrict; MPWSP,asproposed,impair notlegallyfeasible,the swornexperttestimonyand groundwaterresources noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
MarkFogelman groundwaterqualityinthe Commissionmaynotapprove recentscientificresearch (Chapter4). required.SeealsoRT,Dec. Hearings;April2016Evidentiary
andRuthStoner projectarea? theproject. concerningthelikelyadverse 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
Muzzin; impactofMPWSP Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
mfogelman@fried desalinationintakewellson andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
manspring.com; groundwaterintheproject forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
rmuzzin@friedma area pp.78.
nspring.com;(415)
37 8343800
15
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:Water IftheMPWSPasproposedis MCWDwillpresentupdated SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously

WaterDistrict; rightsassumingthe notlegallyfeasible,the swornexperttestimonyand groundwaterresources noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
MarkFogelman Commissionmaydecidethe Commissionmaynotapprove recentscientificresearch (Chapter4). required.SeealsoRT,Dec. Hearings;April2016Evidentiary
andRuthStoner matter,andassumingthat theproject. concerningthelikelyadverse 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
Muzzin; theSWRCB's2013reviewof impactofMPWSP Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
mfogelman@fried theproposedMPWSPis desalinationintakewellson andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
manspring.com; correctasamatteroflaw groundwaterintheproject forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
rmuzzin@friedma and notsupersededbythe area pp.78.
nspring.com;(415) SustainableGroundwater
8343800 ManagementAct,other
applicablelaw,orcontract
(includingEx.MCD6,the
1996AnnexationAgreement)
hasCAWmetitsburdento
demonstratethatthe
MPWSP'santicipatedadverse
impactstogroundwater
qualityandquantityare
eitherinsignificantorwillbe
mitigatedtoinsignificanceby
thecurrentreturnwater
proposalorotherwise?
38
16
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:IfCAWhas IftheMPWSPasproposedis MCWDwillpresentupdated SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously

WaterDistrict; metitsburdento legallyfeasible,butthe swornexperttestimony groundwaterresources noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
MarkFogelman demonstratethatthe returnwatervolumerequired concerningreasonable (Chapter4). required.SeealsoRT,Dec. Hearings;April2016Evidentiary
andRuthStoner MPWSP'santicipatedadverse issogreatastorenderthe calculationofreturnwater 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
Muzzin; impactstogroundwater projectinfeasibleasa volume Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
mfogelman@fried qualityandquantityare practicalmatter,the andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
manspring.com; eitherinsignificantorwillbe Commissionshouldnot forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
rmuzzin@friedma mitigatedtoinsignificanceby approvetheproject. pp.78.Returnwater
nspring.com;(415) thecurrentreturnwater issueswerepreviouslyaddressed.See
8343800 proposal,whatisthevolume April2013andApril2016Evidentiary
ofwaterthatmustbe Hearings.
returnedtothebasin,and
mustitbecalculatedona1:1
orgreaterratiotoeffectively
mitigateharmstothebasin
andtotheprojectarea?
39
MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:IfCAWhas IfCAW'sproposedreturn MCWDwillpresentupdated Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously
WaterDistrict; metitsburdento waterlocationfailsto swornexperttestimony noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
MarkFogelman demonstratethatthe effectivelymitigatethe concerningthelocationof required.SeealsoRT,Dec. Hearings;April2016Evidentiary
andRuthStoner MPWSP'santicipatedadverse project'sharmsandthus returnwaterinrelationto 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
Muzzin; impactstogroundwater renderstheproject theproject'sadverseimpacts Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
mfogelman@fried qualityandquantityare infeasible,theCommission togroundwater andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
manspring.com; eitherinsignificantorwillbe shouldnotapprovethe forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
rmuzzin@friedma mitigatedtoinsignificanceby project. pp.78.Returnwater
nspring.com;(415) thecurrentreturnwater issueswerepreviouslyaddressed.See
8343800 proposal,andareturnwater April2013andApril2016Evidentiary
proposalisdeterminedtobe Hearings.
consistentwiththeAgency
Act'sprohibitiononthe
exportofgroundwaterfrom
theSVGB,whereinthebasin
mustwaterbereturnedin
ordertoeffectivelymitigate
theproject'sharms?
40
17
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:areCAW's IftheMPWSPasproposed MCWDwillpresentupdated Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously

WaterDistrict; assumptionsconcerningthe cannotsatisfytheAgency swornexperttestimony noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
MarkFogelman brackishnessofthesource Act,theCommissionshould concerningtheMPWSP's required.SeealsoRT,Dec. Hearings;April2016Evidentiary
andRuthStoner waterandthevolumeof notapprovetheproject. abilitytooperatein 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
Muzzin; returnwatersufficientto satisfactionoftheAgencyAct Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
mfogelman@fried satisfytheAgencyActnon andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
manspring.com; exportationrequirement? forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
rmuzzin@friedma pp.78.Returnwater
nspring.com;(415) issueswerepreviouslyaddressed.See
8343800 April2013andApril2016Evidentiary
Hearings.
41
MarinaCoast LegalFeasibilityAssuming IftheMPWSPasproposedis MCWDispresently Thisisalegalissueforwhich PreemptionoftheCountyordinance
WaterDistrict; theMPWSPisnecessaryand bothnecessaryandfeasible, evaluatingtheneedfor noevidenceortestimonyis waspreviouslyaddressed.SeeDecision
MarkFogelman theCommission andtheCommissionissuesa testimonyonthisissue,as required.SeealsoRT,Dec. DeclaringPreemptionofCounty
andRuthStoner contemplatesissuingaCPCN CPCNinconflictwiththe opposedtopurelylegal 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. OrdinanceandtheExerciseof
Muzzin; thatwouldconflictwiththe "DesalOrdinance"butthe briefing ParamountJurisdiction,October25,
mfogelman@fried MontereyCountyordinance SGMAsupportsenforcement 2012
manspring.com; requiringpublicownershipof ofthe"DesalOrdinance,"the
rmuzzin@friedma desalinationfacilities,does Commissionshouldnot
nspring.com;(415) theSustainableGroundwater approvetheprojectwithout
8343800 ManagementAct,which ensuringthatthepublic
assignsgroundwater ownershiprequirementis
protectiontolocal satisfied.
authorities,impairthe
Commission'spotential
authoritytopreemptthe
Countyordinance?
42
18
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast LegalFeasibilitywhat TheStateofCalifornia, CAWandotherpartieswith TheDEIR/EISanalyzes Thisisalegalissueforwhich

WaterDistrict; proposalsdoesCAWhavefor includingtheCommission, informationonthesubject greenhousegasemissions, noevidenceortestimonyis
MarkFogelman theMPWSPtobeconsistent hasmadereductioninGHG wouldbeaskedtoprovide concludingthatimpactsare required.SeealsoRT,Dec.
andRuthStoner initsoperationwiththe emissionsapriorityanda sworntestimonyastotheir significantandunavoidable. 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14.
Muzzin; California'sGlobalWarming matterofstatepolicy. viewsonrenewablepower Mitigationmeasure4.111(a)
mfogelman@fried SolutionsAct(AB32)andits sourceorpurchaseoptions requiresaGHGEmissions
manspring.com; progeny,suchasenergy fortheMPWSP ReductionPlan.
rmuzzin@friedma conservation,
nspring.com;(415) implementationofrenewable
8343800 energysources,and
minimizingprojectsize?
43
MarinaCoast Feasibilitywhatplansdoes Erosionandsealevelrise TheCityofMarina,CAWand Coastalerosionisanalyzedin Beacherosionandsealevelrisewas
WaterDistrict; CAWhavefortheMPWSPto mayhavesevereimpactson anyotherpartieswith DEIR/DEISChapter4.2 previouslyaddressed.SeeApril2013
MarkFogelman addressbeacherosionand thepracticalfeasibilityofthe informationonthesubject (impact4.210);Sealevelrise EvidentiaryHearings.
andRuthStoner sealevelriseissuesatthe proposedprojectslantwells wouldbeaskedtoprovide isanalyzedinDEIR/DEIS
Muzzin; proposedCEMEXsite? sworntestimonyconcerning Chapter4.3(impact4.311)
mfogelman@fried sealevelriseandbeach
manspring.com; erosionimpactsonthe
rmuzzin@friedma MPWSP
nspring.com;(415)
44 8343800
19
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast FeasibilityCAWshould TheCommissionshould MCWDwillpresentsworn Thisisalegalissueforwhich

WaterDistrict; explainitsplanstoutilizefor ensurethattheMPWSP,if testimonyconcerningthe noevidenceortestimonyis
MarkFogelman MPWSPproductwater necessary,isalsofeasible,as presentandfeasibleusesof required.SeealsoRT,Dec.
andRuthStoner conveyanceapipelineowned proposed. itspipelineandconcerningits 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14.
Muzzin; byMCWDwhen(1)CAW's currentwheelingagreement
mfogelman@fried pipelinecapacitydoesnot withCAWasappliedtoASR
manspring.com; havepriority;(2)pipeline water.CAWshouldbe
rmuzzin@friedma capacitywasnotdesignedfor requiredtoprovidesworn
nspring.com;(415) the24/7transferof9.6MGD testimonyastothecostand
8343800 ofdesalproductwater;and impactsofconstructinganew
(3)CAWapparentlyplansto segmentofpipelineto
utilizethesamepipelineto transportvolumesof
pumpASRwaterinthe desalinatedproductwater
oppositedirectionforstorage anditshouldexplainwhyit
intheSeasideBasin.CAW's failedtoprovideinformation
proposeduseofMCWD's concerningitsintendeduse
pipelineforthe ofthewheelingpipelineto
transportationofMPWSP thepartiesandtothe
productwateriscurrentlythe Commission.
subjectofacontractual
disputeresolutionprocess.
45
MarinaCoast CommunityValuesisthe CommunityValuesisoneof Partieswouldbeaskedto Communityvalueswerepreviously
WaterDistrict; MPWSPconsistentwiththe thefactorstheCommission presenttestimonyconcerning addressed.SeeEvidentiaryHearings
MarkFogelman regionalcommunity'svalues? mustconsiderunderPublic theirviewsontheMPWSP's April2013.
andRuthStoner UtilitiesCodesection1002 consistencywithcommunity
Muzzin; values.MCWDmaypresent
mfogelman@fried sworntestimonyconcerning
manspring.com; itsviewontheMPWSP's
rmuzzin@friedma consistencywithcommunity
nspring.com;(415) values
46 8343800
20
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast CommunityValuesisthe CommunityValuesisoneof Partieswouldbeaskedto Thisisalegalissueforwhich

WaterDistrict; MPWSPconsistentwiththe thefactorstheCommission presenttestimonyconcerning noevidenceortestimonyis
MarkFogelman PublicTrustDoctrine? mustconsiderunderPublic theirviewsontheMPWSP's required.SeealsoRT,Dec.
andRuthStoner UtilitiesCodesection1002 consistencywithcommunity 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14.
Muzzin; values,includingPublicTrust
mfogelman@fried values.MCWDmaypresent
manspring.com; sworntestimonyconcerning
rmuzzin@friedma itsviewontheMPWSP's
nspring.com;(415) consistencywithcommunity
8343800 values,includingPublicTrust
values.
47
MarinaCoast Reasonablenessand CostsfortheMPWSP,if CAW,ORA,MPWMD, Thisisalegalissueforwhich TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated
WaterDistrict; prudencyofcostsisit approved,mustbe MRWPCAandotherparties noevidenceortestimonyis evidenceonestimatedcosts.
MarkFogelman reasonableandprudentfor reasonableandprudent. withinformationoran required.SeealsoRT,Dec.
andRuthStoner CAWtocontinuepursuinga CAW'scostsforpursuitofthe interestinCAW'srateswould 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14.
Muzzin; 6.4or9.6mgdMPWSPafter project,evenifitisnot beaskedtosubmitupdated
mfogelman@fried theCommission'sPhase2 approved,mustalsohave costandprudencytestimony
manspring.com; decisiononGWRandthe beenreasonableandprudent
rmuzzin@friedma availabilityofexpandedASR, iftheyaretobeimposed
nspring.com;(415) andshouldCAW'scostsfor uponratepayers
8343800 doingsoberecoveredin
rates?
48
21
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:Wouldthe Ifthisapproachistobe CAWshouldberequiredto Thisisalegalissueforwhich TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

WaterDistrict; certificationofa9.6MGDor considered,allaspectsofthe presentcomprehensive noevidenceortestimonyis evidenceonthefeasibilityandcostsof
MarkFogelman 6.4MGDMPWSP,as approachmustbeconsidered sworntestimonyaddressing required.SeealsoRT,Dec. thedesalinationplantbeingconstructed
andRuthStoner proposed,withdirectionsto inevidentiaryhearings, allaspectsoftheapproach. 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. inmodularincrements.
Muzzin; installmodularincremental includingthecostsand
mfogelman@fried expansionstoincreasethe prudencyoftheapproach,
manspring.com; initialsizeandconfiguration andtheCommission's
rmuzzin@friedma ofadesalinationplantonly authoritytoadoptit.
nspring.com;(415) uponaparticularized
8343800 showingofneed,violatethe
Commission'sdutynotto
issueaCPCNunlessitfinds
thatthepublicconvenience
andnecessityrequiresthe
constructionoftheproject
underPublicUtilitiesCode
section1001?
49
MarinaCoast Supply:CAWhasindicated Ifalternatesourcescan CAW,MPWMDandother TheMontereyPipelinewaspreviously
WaterDistrict; thatthenewMonterey providesufficientsupplyto partieswithsuchinformation addressedintheApril2013andApril
MarkFogelman Pipelinewillenableitto CAWthatcouldsignificantly wouldbeaskedtoprovide 2016EvidentiaryHearings.
andRuthStoner divertandrecoveron reducethecapacityor sworntestimonyastoan
Muzzin; averageanadditional1,000 perhapseliminatetheneed accurateandrealistic
mfogelman@fried AFYofCarmelRiverASR fordesalinationaltogether, projectionofavailableASR
manspring.com; water.Thisshouldbe thereisnoneedforthis capacityasofJanuary1,
rmuzzin@friedma verifiedontherecord. project 2022.
nspring.com;(415)
50 8343800
22
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MarinaCoast DueProcess/Other:Doesthe TheCommissionmust Anypartywithrelevant Thisisalegalissueforwhich Thiswaspreviouslyaddressedbyhiring

WaterDistrict; acknowledgedconflictof exerciseitsindependent informationwouldsubmit,or noevidenceortestimonyis ofnewconsultantsbytheCPUC.
MarkFogelman interestofDennisWilliams judgmentasaneutral berequiredbythe required.SeealsoRT,Dec.
andRuthStoner andhisfirmGeoscience,Inc. decisionmakerinevaluating Commissiontosubmit,sworn 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14.
Muzzin; impedetheCommission's theapplication. testimonyconcerningthe
mfogelman@fried impartialconsiderationofthe impactoftheacknowledged
manspring.com; MPWSP,includingthe conflictofinterestonthe
rmuzzin@friedma proposeduseofslantwells Commission's
nspring.com;(415) fordesalinationintakeand decisionmaking.
8343800 therejectionofalternative
meansofintakeand
alternativenondesalination
supplysources,
notwithstandingCommission
staff'sdecisiontoconsiderall
workofMr.Williamsand
Geoscienceashavingbeen
performedonbehalfofCAW,
andifso,whatisthe
appropriateremedy?
51
Monterey MPRWAPresidentandCityof Theprojectshouldbesized MayorKampe'stestimony Inresponsetothisproposed
PeninsulaRegional PacificGroveMayor,Bill tomeetthefuturedemands woulddiscusstheMPRWA's issue,CalAmreferstoits
WaterAuthority; Kampe,maysubmit withintheCAWsystem,as perspectiveofdemand generalcommentsinSection
Russell testimonyonthesubjectof setforthintheapplication, forecastsandtheproject's IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
McGlothlin;(805) demandforecastsandthe andtopartiallyreplenishthe sizing. Water'sCommentsonJoint
8821418 relationtoprojectsizing. SeasideGroundwaterBasin. StatementofIssues.
Demandforecastshouldbe
reasonabletoavoid
oversizingtheprojectandto
appropriatelycontrolproject
costs,butalsoappropriately
conservativetoavoidfuture
watersupplyshortages.
52
23
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
Monterey MPRWAPresidentandCityof Whilethereisnoassurance Ifoneormoresettlement Inresponsetothisproposed

PeninsulaRegional PacificGroveMayor,Bill thatnewsettlementswillbe agreementsarereached(or issue,CalAmreferstoits
WaterAuthority; Kampe,maysubmit reachedpriorthesubmission thereisagreementtomodify generalcommentsinSection
Russell testimonyconcerning ofevidence,itisappropriate existingsettlement IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
McGlothlin;(805) modificationsofexisting toreservethematterfor agreements),MayorKampe Water'sCommentsonJoint
8821418 settlementagreementsor furthertestimonyif willoffertestimony StatementofIssues.
newsettlementagreements settlementsarereached. concerningtheMPRWA's
thatmybereachedpriorto perspectivesrelatingtothe
thesubmissionoftestimony. settlementagreement(s).
53
Monterey CAWandotherpartiesshall Seeanswerto(b). Withtheexceptionof Inresponsetothisproposed
PeninsulaRegional submittestimonyonthe MPRWAtestimony issue,CalAmreferstoits
WaterAuthority; topicssetforthwithinALJ concerningdemandforecasts generalcommentsinSection
Russell Weatherford'sruling. andprojectsizing,testimony IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
McGlothlin;(805) concerningtheotherfour Water'sCommentsonJoint
8821418 subjectsproposedintheALJ's StatementofIssues.
rulingshouldbeprovidedby
CAWandotherpartieswith
specificknowledgeapplicable
tothosesubjects.The
MPRWAmayofferrebuttal
testimonyonanyofthe
topicslistedintherulingor
othersubjectsaddedfor
testimony.Inparticular,the
MPRWAmayofferrebuttal
testimonyfromits
hydrogeologicexpertwitness,
GordonThrupp,orother
expertwitnesses.
54
24
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
Monterey CAWandotherparties,as Seeanswerto(b). CAWandotherparties,as Inresponsetothisproposed

PeninsulaRegional desired,shallsubmit desired,shallpresent issue,CalAmreferstoits
WaterAuthority; testimonyconcerningthe testimonyconcerningthehe generalcommentsinSection
Russell comparativefeasibilityof comparativefeasibilityand IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
McGlothlin;(805) intaketechnologies,including optimalityofthepossible Water'sCommentsonJoint
8821418 withoutlimitationtheslant sourcewaterintake StatementofIssues.
wells,asproposed,and technologies.TheMPRWA
RanneyWells. maysubmitrebuttal
testimonyconcerningthe
intaketechnologiesfromits
hydrogeologicexpert.
55
Monterey IFitisdetermined: Ifadditionalalternativewater MPWMDwouldsponsor Inresponsetothisproposed
PeninsulaWater (i)CalAmconsumerdemand suppliescanbeprovidedto witnessestoprovide issue,CalAmreferstoits
Management doesnotjustifycurrent CAWthatcouldreducethe testimonyonfollowing generalcommentsinSection
District;David projectsizingormayallowan capacityforthedesalination issues:Supportandamplify IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
Laredo; alternateprojecttomeetthe projectorcosttoratepayer, MRWPCAtestimony Water'sCommentsonJoint
dave@laredolaw.n newlydetermineddemand, thealternativesshouldbe regardingthestatusofPure StatementofIssues.
et;8316461502 ORif consideredmaterialor WaterMonterey,including
(ii)modularincrementsto requirefurtherevidence. constructionbidsandproject
thedesalinationplantare Thecostofdesalis schedulestatus.Supportand
deemedfeasible,butfixed beneficiallyaffectedby amplifyMRWPCAtestimony
costswarrantexaminationof choosingtherightsized regardingPureWater
othersupplyalternativesdue project. Montereyexpansion
toeconomicratepayer potential,including:(i)
impacts,ORif availabilityofothersource
(iii)concernsexistrelatedto waterstoPureWater,
delayorabandonmentofthe includingwinterwastewater
desalinationprojectdueto flows,amongothers;(ii)
legalortechnological capitalcosts,timing,
concerns. regulatoryortechnical
constraints;and(iii)
wholesalecostofwaterand
impactonratepayers.
56
25
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
MPWMDwouldalsosponsor Inresponsetothisproposed
witnessestoprovide issue,CalAmreferstoits
testimonyregardingthree generalcommentsinSection
additionalalternatives(raw IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
waterpipeline,SalinasRiver Water'sCommentsonJoint
waterrights,andASR StatementofIssues.
expansion)including:(i)
availabilityandquantityof
thewatersource;(ii)capital
costs,timing,regulatoryor
technicalconstraints;and(iii)
wholesalecostofwaterand
impactonratepayers.
THENandinresponsetoany Seeissue56,columnC. Seeissue56,columnD. Inresponsetothisproposed

oralloftheseissues, issue,CalAmreferstoits
MPWMDshallpresent generalcommentsinSection
testimonyonwhetheranyof IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
thefollowingalternativescan Water'sCommentsonJoint
meetalloraportionofthe StatementofIssues.
supplyneedsbasedon
consumerdemand,costto
ratepayer,and/orreasonable
timeline:
ExpansionofthePure
WaterMontereyproject.
56(a)
Constructionofarawocean Seeissue56,columnC. Seeissue56,columnD. Inresponsetothisproposed
waterintakeanddelivery issue,CalAmreferstoits
pipelinefromDeepWater generalcommentsinSection
Desal(oranotherdeveloper) IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
totheproposedMPWSP Water'sCommentsonJoint
desalinationplant, StatementofIssues.
eliminatingtheneedforslant
wellsintheCEMEXand
Marinalocale.
56(b)
26
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
SalinasRiverwaterrights, Seeissue56,columnC. Seeissue56,columnD. Inresponsetothisproposed

viaeither(a)negotiationfora issue,CalAmreferstoits
portionoftheexistingWR generalcommentsinSection
11043,or(b)applicationfora IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
newwinteronlywaterright, Water'sCommentsonJoint
toprovidefeedwaterforan StatementofIssues.
advancedwatertreatment
facilityinNorthMarinain
conjunctionwithPureWater
Montereyortoprovidefeed
watertotheMPWSP
desalinationplant,with
storagetooccurinthe
SeasideGroundwaterBasin
oranotherlocation.
56(c)
ExpansionofASR(Aquifer Seeissue56,columnC. Seeissue56,columnD. Inresponsetothisproposed
StorageandRecovery) issue,CalAmreferstoits
capacity,includingbutnot generalcommentsinSection
limitedtonewsupplywells, IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
ironremoval,water Water'sCommentsonJoint
treatment,pumpstations, StatementofIssues.
andinjectionfacilities.
56(d)
MRWPCA MontereyRegionalWater AdditionalPureWater MontereyRegionalWater Inresponsetothisproposed
(MontereyOne PollutionControlAgencyshall Montereywatercouldhelp PollutionControlAgency issue,CalAmreferstoits
Water)Paul presenttestimonyonthe meettheCDO. wouldprovideinformationon generalcommentsinSection
Sciuto,831645 potentialforthePureWater whethermorethan3,500 IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
4600 Montereywaterrecycling acrefeetannuallycouldbe Water'sCommentsonJoint
projecttoprovideCAW providedfromthePure StatementofIssues.
greaterthan3,500acrefeet WaterMontereyprojectto
annually. CAW.And,ifitispossible,
provideapproximatecostand
timing.
57
27
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
Officeof ORAagreesthatthe Issuesidentifiedinthe Tobedeterminedbasedon Inresponsetothisproposed

Ratepayer Commissionsruling,dated Commission'srulingmay additionaldiscovery. issue,CalAmreferstoits
Advocates June9,2017,identifiesissues havedirectimpactsuponthe
Additionaldiscoverymaybe generalcommentsinSection
SuzieRose thatmaybenecessaryto costreasonablenessand necessaryforitems IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
suzie.rose@cpuc.c considerinsubsequent prudencyoftheproposed determinedbythe Water'sCommentsonJoint
a.gov testimonyandhearings. project. CommissioninaScoping StatementofIssues.
4157031254 Rulingasissuestobe
58 considered.
PublicTrust Givenupdatesoncostsand Desalinationhasalwaysbeen TheCommissionwillbe Climatechangeisaddressed Thisisalegalissueforwhich
Alliance;Michael changesinenvironment "deemed"reasonableby requiredtoexplainits intheDEIR/DEIS. noevidenceortestimonyis
Warburton; (climatechange)and assumptioninthis decisionregardingthefinal required.SeealsoRT,Dec.
Michael@rri.org; institutions(groundwater proceedingandneedstobe projecttothepublicina 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14.
(510)6100868 law)couldthenew subjectedtoa mannerconsistentwithits
infrastructure(seasidebasin, reasonablenessanalysisto missionandbylaws.
ASRprojectsandnew ensurethatthefinalproject
pipelines)serveasapublic isconsistentwithlongterm
watersupplybasiswithout publicinterests.
anynewdesalinationplant?
59
PublicWaterNow, Cost:Slantwell Theexplodingcostofthis SWRCB,CCCandCEQA Slantwellviabilityandfeasibilitywas
GeorgeT.Riley, viability/feasibilitymusthave experimentishorrendousto guidelinesandreferencesto previouslyaddressed.SeeApril2013
georgetriley@gma aspecificeconomicimpact allratepayers.Itmaybetoo economicfactorson EvidentiaryHearings.
il.com,831645 evaluation. costlytocontinue. 'feasibility'shouldbeallowed
9914 andbecomepartofthe
recordpriortoconsideration
60 of a CPCN.
PWN Other:Waterrights.ESA Allintakewaterisfrom Thereforewaterrightsshould Thisisalegalissueforwhich WaterRightswerepreviouslyaddressed.
statedintheDEIRthatwater intrudedaquifersthathave besubjecttoevidentiary noevidenceortestimonyis SeeAdministrativeLawJudgeRuling,
rightsisnotapropersubject overlyinglandowners. hearings. required.SeealsoRT,Dec. June1,2012(seekingbriefingonwater
fortheCEQA/NEPAreview, 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. rights);DecisionDeclaringPreemption
butitwasaddedfor ofCountyOrdinanceandtheExerciseof
perspective.Itneeds ParamountJurisdiction,October25,
evidentiaryreview. 2012;EvidentiaryHearingsApril2013
61
28
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
PWN WaterRights.AgLandTrust Thesedocumentsand PWNwillofferawitnessand Thisisalegalissueforwhich WaterRightswerepreviouslyaddressed.

hasfederalcontractrights testimonyonthemwillbe testimony. noevidenceortestimonyis SeeAdministrativeLawJudgeRuling,
thathavenotbeen importantforthefactual required.SeealsoRT,Dec. June1,2012(seekingbriefingonwater
acknowledgedinprior record. 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. rights);DecisionDeclaringPreemption
hearings. ofCountyOrdinanceandtheExerciseof
ParamountJurisdiction,October25,
2012;EvidentiaryHearingsApril2013
62
PWN Costs:Potentialcostof Nowhereisthisbeing PWNwillexaminewhatever Irrelevanttothese
litigationanddelay discussed.Thereishuge evidencethatisofferedon proceedings.
economicriskiftheprojectis alternativesupply,allin
sidelined.Ifthishappens,the supportofthemostfeasible
communityabsolutely andlowercosts.Waitingis
requiresoneormore nolongeranoption.
alternativestopursue.
63
PWN CommunityValues/Other: Thereshouldbenew ThedatafromAEMERTmust Groundwatermodeling Basinimpactswerepreviously
NewdatafromAEMERT. evidenceonthis,andto beadmitted.Itsrelevance pertainstoenvironmental addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
determinewhatimpactsand mustbeexploredwith analysisofprojectimpactsto Hearings;April2016Evidentiary
costsmaybeimposedonthe testimonyandexamined. groundwaterresources.See Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
project.Newandextensive DEIR/DEISChapter4.4. Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
datashouldnotbeshoved Commentwassubmitted andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
aside.Conclusionsaboutthe duringpubliccomment forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
slantwellexperimentmay period;ESAisaddressing. pp.78.
hingeonafullerbasisfor
analysis.
64
PWN Demand/Sizing:Therehas Thereforethesizeofthe CPUCshouldordertestimony Theabilityoffuturesupply TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated
beencontinuedsuccessful desalcanbequestioned,or onoptionalwaystodown alternativestomeetproject evidenceontheforecasteddemand.
conservationbyratepayersin atleasttheprojectedfuture sizethewatersupply objectivesanalyzedin
allcustomercategories. needcanbemoregradual, proposalfordesal,and DEIR/DEIS.
includinglotsofrecord. furthermoreordertestimony
onoptionalmethodsand
sources.
65
29
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
PWN Cost&Demand/Sizing: Theproceedingwould ThecommunityandCPUC Projectalternativesanalyzed TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

Supplyalternativesother benefitfromtestimonyon willbenefitfromtestimony inDEIR/DEIS.Adequacyof evidenceontheforecasteddemand.
thandesal othersupplyoptionsthat onamorediverseportfolioof alternativesisalegalissue
couldaddressexistingneed, options. analyzedunderCEQA.
neartermfutureneeds,and
stillmeetCDOparameters.
66
PWN CommunityValues:Regional AlthoughCPUCorderedCal Evidenceofimpactsinandon Socioeconomicand
Justice.Evidentiary Amin2007toconsidera theneighboringMarinaCoast Environmentaljusticeis
testimonyshouldbeallowed regionalapproach,CalAm WaterDistrictisfactualand analyzedinChapter4.20.
todiscussCalAminvasion, hasabandonedthatidea.In relevant.TheALJshould
uninvited,totakewaterfrom factithasdonethevery orderthistestimonyinorder
aneighboringwater oppositebyinvadinga tounderstandtheregional
jurisdiction. neighboringwater impacts,valuesand
jurisdiction. significance.
67
PWN CommunityValues:CDO CDOpressureemphasizes'on Thisisahugenegativeimpact CAWisrequiredtocomply
Pressure.Theregulatory time'supply,andde onallplanningforthefuture. withtheSWRCBandthe
deadlinedrivetoomany emphasesmorereasonable Testimonyshouldbeordered CPUCdoesnothave
prioritiesanddeadlines, optionslikecapturingand thatincludeshow jurisdictionovertheSWRCB.
mainlycausedbyCalAm storingSalinasRiverwinter reasonablenessofanoption
neglectoroverpromising. runoff. isconstrainedbytheCDO
schedule.
68
PWN Cost:Thereturnwater MarinaandCastrovilleare Testimonyshouldbeordered SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously
mitigationatCastroville. bothlowincomeservice onthecomparativecostofa groundwaterresources noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
areas.Thisisanissueof Marinasite. (Chapter4). required.SeealsoRT,Dec. Hearings;April2016Evidentiary
regionaljustice,sinceMarina 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
istheareaofextraction. Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
pp.78.Returnwater
issueswerepreviouslyaddressed.See
April2013andApril2016Evidentiary
Hearings.
69
30
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
PWN Cost:Thepotentialfor Ratepayershavebornethe CPUCshouldordertestimony Thisisoutsidethescopeof

strandedcosts fullburdenofallstranded onpriorwatersupply thisproceeding.
costsfrompriorCalAm strandedcosts,amounts
effortsthatfailed. allocatedtoratepayersand
toshareholders,andtoassist
inafullunderstandinghow
strandedcostdeterminations
aremade.
70
PWN CommunityValues: Noneofthiswasnewlawhas EvidenceoftherecentSGMA ApplicabilityofSGMAisa
SustainabilityGroundwater beenconsideredinprior lawanddemandonlocal legalissue.
ManagementAct(SGMA). hearings. wateragenciesinthis
proceedingshouldbe
allowedinorderto
understandtheoverlapof
71 issues with this project.
PWN Other:Changed Theseareonlythemost Thereshouldbetestimonyto ApplicabilityofSGMAisa Basinimpactswerepreviously
circumstances(Drought, obviousexamplesofchanged puttheCPCNdecisionintoa legalissue.Adequacyof addressed.SeeApril2013Evidentiary
SGMA,etc.). circumstances.Allhave largercontext.Afterall,the alternativesisalegalissue Hearings;April2016Evidentiary
significancewiththisproject. Peninsulacommunitywill analyzedunderCEQA. Hearings.SeealsoAdministrativeLaw
havetolivewiththeoutcome Judge'sRulingSettingEvidentiaryIssues
forgenerations. andScheduletoCompletetheRecord
forPhases1and2,November17,2015,
pp.78.
72
PWN Other:LargeSettlement Targetdateshavechanged TheCPUCshouldorderthe TheabilityoftheCPUCto
Agreement substantially.Sequencinghaspartiestoupdatethe orderpartiestoasettlement
changed.TheCDOhasbeen proposedLargeSettlement toreconsidertheir
extended,andnew Agreementtoconsiderthe settlementisalegalissue.
milestonescreated. issuesbroughtoutinnew
73 evidentiaryhearings.
PWN Other:PublicParticipation Thepublicshouldhavean TheCPUCshouldorderthata Notestimonyisrequiredfor
Hearing. opportunitytobeupdated. PublicParticipationHearing thisissue.
bescheduledafternew
evidentiaryhearingsare
74 complete.
31
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
PWN Cost:CalAmbiddocuments Thesecostsmustbeupdated.

CPUCshouldorderCalAmto
providefulltestimonyonthe TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated
75 statusthebiddocuments. evidenceonestimatedcosts.
PWN Cost:RecentCalAmrate TheoverallcostofCalAm CPUCshouldorderareport Thisisoutsidethescopeof
increases services,andprojectcost onallrateincreasessincethe thisproceeding.
projections,andthe beginningofthisproceeding,
cumulativeimpactson andtodistinguishwhichwere
ratepayers,shouldbebetter forthisprojectandwhich
understood.WilltheCPUC wereforotherreasons.
'silo'rulespreventthis?
76
Surfrider WhetherdemandinCalAms Theproject'ssizeandthe Showingthata6.4MGD Inresponsetothisproposed
Foundation; serviceareajustifiesthe6.4 amountofpurchased desalinationplantislarger issue,CalAmreferstoits
Edward MGDdesalinationplantthat recycledwaterismaterialto thanisnecessaryor generalcommentsinSection
Schexnayder; CalAmcurrentlyproposes. determiningthenecessityof convenienttomeetdemand IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
schexnayder@sm theproposedproject,any inCalAm'sservicearea. Water'sCommentsonJoint
wlaw.com;415 sizelimitationsthatthe StatementofIssues.
5527272 Commissionmayimposeasa
conditiontoaCPCNforthe
project,theproject's
influenceonthe
environment,anditsultimate
costtoratepayers.
77
32
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
Surfrider WhetherCalAmcanand Theproject'ssizeandthe ShowingthatthePureWater Inresponsetothisproposed

Foundation shouldincreasethevolume amountofpurchased Montereyprojectcanprovide issue,CalAmreferstoits
ofwaterprocuredfromthe recycledwaterismaterialto morethan3,500afyofwater generalcommentsinSection
PureWaterMontereywater determiningthenecessityof toCalAmcustomers. IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
recyclingproject. theproposedproject,any Water'sCommentsonJoint
sizelimitationsthatthe StatementofIssues.
Commissionmayimposeasa
conditiontoaCPCNforthe
project,theproject's
influenceonthe
environment,anditsultimate
costtoratepayers.
78
Surfrider Whatcombinationofonsite Maximizingtheproject's Identifyingafeasiblepackage Inresponsetothisproposed
Foundation andoffsiterenewable relianceonrenewable ofrenewableresourcesthat issue,CalAmreferstoits
resources(includingonsite resourcescoulddecrease shouldbeusedtopowerthe generalcommentsinSection
solar,energyefficiency,and bothratepayercostsand project. IVofitsCaliforniaAmerican
storage)shouldCalAmuseto greenhousegasemissions Water'sCommentsonJoint
meetthedesalinationplant's associatedwiththeproject's StatementofIssues.
energyneeds? energyuse.
79
WaterPlus;Ron CalAmshallpresent ThefeasibilityoftheMPWSP CalAmwouldhavetoshow Thisisalegalissueforwhich Returnwaterissueswerepreviously
Weitzman; testimonycontradicting dependsonthevalidityofthe thatallthegroundwater noevidenceortestimonyis addressed.SeeApril2013andApril
ronweitzman@red existingevidencethatthe returnwaterproposal. pumpedbythetestwell required.SeealsoRT,Dec. 2016EvidentiaryHearings.Seealso
shift.com;(831) returnwaterproposalfailsto comesfromtheinland180 13,2012,PHC2,p.171:14. AdministrativeLawJudge'sRuling
3758439 satisfythestateAgencyAct. footaquifer. SettingEvidentiaryIssuesandSchedule
toCompletetheRecordforPhases1and
2,November17,2015,pp.78.
80
33
A C D
evidentiaryhearings
partyrecommendsitbe
WaterPlus;Ron Sincedemanddependson Ratepayershaveexperienced CalAmwouldhaveto TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

Weitzman; costandcostdependson largeandunpredictedrate estimatefuturedemandfor evidenceontheforecasteddemand.
ronweitzman@red supply,CalAmshallpresent hikesbecauseCalAmhasin waterbyusingsupplyand
shift.com;(831) testimonyshowinghow thepastfailedtoestimate costprojectionsalongwith
3758439 proposedreducedsupply demandcorrectly,atleast existingdemanddatain
wouldaffectbothcostand partlybyignoringor supplydemandcurve
demandforwater. miscalculatingtheeffectsof analysesforeachresidential
supplyandcostondemand. tier,aswellasforcommercial
customers.
81
WaterPlus;Ron TheMontereyRegional Anumberofpartieshave TheMontereyRegional Pertainstoenvironmental
Weitzman; WaterPollutionControl proposedthattheexistingor WaterPollutionControl reviewofGWRproject;
ronweitzman@red Agencyshallpresent anexpandedversionsofPure Agencymustshowwhyit irrelevanttothese
shift.com;(831) testimonyshowingthat WaterMonterreycould doesnotneedtoprovide proceedings.
3758439 testingforpesticidesto substitutefordesalinationor standardsandaregimenfor
protectpublichealthis otherwatersupplysources, testingproductwaterfor
unnecessaryinboththe butpesticidesarelikelyto pesticidesinbothits
urbanandruralrecycling passthroughtherecycling recyclingcomponentsto
componentsofthePure processtomaketheproduct assurepublichealthand
WaterMontereyproject. waterineitherorboth safety,aswellasareliable
projectcomponentsathreat sourceofwater.
topublichealth.
82
34

Attachment A 7-11-17

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Attachment A 7-11-17

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

FILED

California Updatedcostestimatesfor TheRulingstatesthat CalAmwillprovidetestimony Inresponsetothisproposed

California Aprojectalternativethat TheRulingstatesthat CalAmwillprovidetestimony Inresponsetothisproposed

CitizensforJust TheMontereyPeninsula ThisProjectnegatively CPUCmustrequiremore Accuracyofproject AssignedCommissioner'sRuling

CitizensforJust TheMontereyPeninsula MarinaandFormerFortOrd CalAmmustevaluateand SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Thisisalegalissueforwhich Waterdemandwaspreviously

CitizensforJust The"Project"willcreatelong Economicrecoveryforthe CalAmtoprovidetestimony TrafficandTransportation

CityofMarina; Whatisthetruewater Acurrentandobjective CalAm'stotalexisting TheAdministrativeLawJudge'sRuling

CityofMarina; CanCalAmshowthatthe Thisisathresholdfeasibility ItappearsthatCalAmhasno Thisisalegalissueforwhich WaterRightswerepreviouslyaddressed.

CityofMarina; Whatquantityof Thisissuehasnotbeen TheamountofBasin SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously

CityofMarina; Whatarethetrackrecord, Thesekeyfactorsare Theslantwelltechnologyis Slanttechnologyandoperationofa

MarinaCoast Demand:WhatisCAW's TheCommissionmayonly CAWwouldbeaskedto TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

MarinaCoast Demand:Whatisan ProjectedPBvolume CAW,MPWMDandother TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

MarinaCoast Supply:Consideringthe TheCommissionmayonly CAW,MPWMDandother TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

MarinaCoast Supply:IfCAWwill TheCommissionmayonly CAWandMPWMDwouldbe Projectalternativesanalyzed

MarinaCoast Supply:IfCAWwill TheCommissionmust MCWDwillpresentsworn Adequacyofalternativesisa Thisisalegalissueforwhich Intakewelltechnologywaspreviously

MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:Willthe IftheMPWSPasproposedis MCWDwillpresentupdated SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Basinimpactswerepreviously

MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:Water IftheMPWSPasproposedis MCWDwillpresentupdated SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously

MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:IfCAWhas IftheMPWSPasproposedis MCWDwillpresentupdated SeeDEIR/DEISharmto Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously

MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:areCAW's IftheMPWSPasproposed MCWDwillpresentupdated Thisisalegalissueforwhich Basinimpactswerepreviously

MarinaCoast LegalFeasibilitywhat TheStateofCalifornia, CAWandotherpartieswith TheDEIR/EISanalyzes Thisisalegalissueforwhich

MarinaCoast FeasibilityCAWshould TheCommissionshould MCWDwillpresentsworn Thisisalegalissueforwhich

MarinaCoast CommunityValuesisthe CommunityValuesisoneof Partieswouldbeaskedto Thisisalegalissueforwhich

MarinaCoast LegalFeasibility:Wouldthe Ifthisapproachistobe CAWshouldberequiredto Thisisalegalissueforwhich TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

MarinaCoast DueProcess/Other:Doesthe TheCommissionmust Anypartywithrelevant Thisisalegalissueforwhich Thiswaspreviouslyaddressedbyhiring

Monterey MPRWAPresidentandCityof Whilethereisnoassurance Ifoneormoresettlement Inresponsetothisproposed

Monterey CAWandotherparties,as Seeanswerto(b). CAWandotherparties,as Inresponsetothisproposed

THENandinresponsetoany Seeissue56,columnC. Seeissue56,columnD. Inresponsetothisproposed

SalinasRiverwaterrights, Seeissue56,columnC. Seeissue56,columnD. Inresponsetothisproposed

Officeof ORAagreesthatthe Issuesidentifiedinthe Tobedeterminedbasedon Inresponsetothisproposed

PWN WaterRights.AgLandTrust Thesedocumentsand PWNwillofferawitnessand Thisisalegalissueforwhich WaterRightswerepreviouslyaddressed.

PWN Cost&Demand/Sizing: Theproceedingwould ThecommunityandCPUC Projectalternativesanalyzed TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

PWN Cost:Thepotentialfor Ratepayershavebornethe CPUCshouldordertestimony Thisisoutsidethescopeof

PWN Cost:CalAmbiddocuments Thesecostsmustbeupdated.

Surfrider WhetherCalAmcanand Theproject'ssizeandthe ShowingthatthePureWater Inresponsetothisproposed

WaterPlus;Ron Sincedemanddependson Ratepayershaveexperienced CalAmwouldhaveto TheRulingalreadyrequestsupdated

Você também pode gostar