Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
de Juanes, Juan. Christ the Eucharist, 16th Century (Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest).
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f1/Juan_de_Juanes_002.jpg.
CONTENTS:
Introduction 3
Section 1: The Concept of Mystery in Steiner and Casel 5
Section 2: Christology as Key to Historiography 15
Section 3: What is Esoteric Historiography? 21
Works Cited 23
This essay compares two very short, very different books. The Holy Grail: The Quest for the
Renewal of the Mysteries by Rudolf Steiner is a collection of meditations on the meaning of the
Holy Grail as it appears in medieval literary works, interpreted through Steiners Anthroposophy,
or Spiritual Science. Through this work, Steiner reveals a historical interpretation of the
significance of the person Christ and the Christ-event. Using the elusive nature of the Holy Grail
as a symbol of the Christ-events mysterious character, Steiner underscores a historical
interpretation of the Catholic Church in which earthly power and spiritual authority are seen as
occluding the Mysteries of Christ. Steiner then offers Anthroposophy as the ideal method with
which to recover these Mysteries, and bring the Holy Grail, as it were, out of the Castle.
The other work is a famous theological essay by Benedictine monk Odo Casel of Maria
Laach Abbey in Germany. In The Mystery of Christian Worship, Casel employs historical-critical
methods and patristics to elucidate the circumstances necessary for the emergence of Christianity
from the milieu of Mystery Religions in the Roman Empire. Casel offers his own historical
interpretation of the person of Christ and the Christ-event. Casel believes that Christs mystical
body is perpetuated and promulgated by the sacred liturgy of the Roman Catholic Church,
especially through the Holy Eucharist. By employing the language of the historical mystery
religions, and by offering congregants the mystical body of Christ, Casel asserts that the Catholic
Church, through its earthly power and spiritual authority, manifests the Mysteries of Christ
constantly through the Mystery of Christian worship.
The comparison of these works offers fruitful information regarding the difference
between esoteric and exoteric historiographies of the Christ-event. In both Casel and
Steiner, it is clear that both Christ the person and Christ the event somehow mediate between
Man1 and the Divine. It is also clear that this contact or encounter with the Divine is desirable
and even necessary to provide satisfaction to Mankind for both Steiner and Casel. Christ (both
1 Stylistic Note: I will be using Man and Mankind (as opposed to man, denoting an individual male of the
species Homo Sapiens Sapiens) throughout this essay to denote Humanity or Humankind. I do this for several
reasons: first, it is an unnecessary waste of space to constantly refer to Humanity as such when Man denotes the
exact same quantity, second, both Casel and Steiner use Man, so its use in the present essay parallels their work,
third, to borrow Jacques Barzuns explanation The reasons in favor of prolonging that usage are four: etymology,
convenience, the unsuspected incompleteness of man and woman, and literary tradition. For further explanation,
see pages 82-85 of Jacques Barzun, From Dawn to Decadence: 500 Years of Western Cultural Life. (New York: Harper-
Collins, 2000).
The understanding of how Christ relates to history in Steiner and Casels works revolves
around the concept of mystery (the Mystery, the Mysteries, mysterium, etc.) and it would behoove
us to explore that concept first and how either author uses this concept to establish a
metaphysical grounding for their assertions.
Steiner has a very particular understanding of the Ancient Mystery religions, what he
most often simply calls the Mysteries. He clearly ascribes to a perennialist interpretation of the
Mysteries: When we go back to the profound priestly wisdom at the heart of [the religions of
various peoples], there is overriding agreement... The knowledge of the Mysteries was a universal
phenomenon. 2 He falls neatly into that pattern of thought and mytho-historical interpretation
that Wouter Hanegraaff calls the ancient wisdom narrative, 3 that is, the assertion in
Renaissance philosophy that the truth claims of the pagan philosophers (especially Plato)
should be related to Christian revelation, whether in the form of prisca theologia or philosophia
perennis. 4 For Steiner, Plato knew of his agreement with the Egyptian priestly authorities... it was
said that of Pythagoras that he had travelled to Egypt and India and was instructed by the wise
men there... A fully developed mysticism existed among the Pharisees... These are some of the
many phrases that clearly place Steiners historical imagination within the ancient wisdom
tradition, along with the Platonic Orientalism central to Hanegraaff s thesis.5 Furthermore,
Steiners habit of linking up the wisdom of the Egyptians, the Greek philosophers, India, and the
Jews (along with the Germanic myths and the Celtic Druids) is clearly a practice of concordance in
Antoine Faivres sense.6 The Mysteries are for Steiner the higher reality of all religions, by
which Man becomes divinized through initiation: The true Osiris is to be found in the human
soul. For although the soul is, to begin with, connected to the transitory realm, it is destined to
2Rudolf Steiner, The Holy Grail: The Quest for the Renewal of the Mysteries (Forest Row, East Sussex, United Kingdom:
Sophia Books, 2001), 17.
3Wouter Hanegraaff, Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2012), 6.
4 For full discussion of these terms, refer to Hanegraaff, 7.
5 Hanegraaff, 12.
6 Antoine Faivre, Access to Western Esotericism (New York: State University of New York Press. 1994), 14.
7 Steiner, 14.
8 Steiner, 15.
9 Faivre, 10-11, 13.
10 Steiner, 16.
11 Steiner, 18.
12 Steiner, 19.
13 Steiner, 21.
It is interesting how Steiners argument about the nature of power in the Church corresponds to the argument Max
Weber makes about the institutionalization of Charisma the ordinary and the charismatic are constantly
interwoven in the process of institution building. For further discussion of how Steiners interpretation of the
Catholic Church embodies this sociological theory, see S.N. Eisenstadt, ed., Max Weber on Charisma and Institution
Building (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968), xxxviii.
14 Steiner, 23.
15 Steiner, 24.
16 Kocku von Stuckrad, Western Esotericism: A Brief History of Secret Knowledge (London: Equinox, 2005.), 10.
17 Steiner, 25.
18 Steiner, 27.
19 Steine, 26.
20 Steiner, 29, 30, 31.
21Steiner, 30, 31, 32.
For similar schemes of human spiritual evolution, see the work by Jocelyn Godwin, Atlantis and the Cycles of Time
(Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions, 2011). Blavatsky is also (in)famous for her human evolutionary paradigm, but the
impression Theosophy made on Anthroposophy has yet to be thoroughly explored.
22 Steiner, 42.
Odo Casels understanding of Mystery often is expressed in similar ways to Steiners, but
because Casel is a Catholic theologian and a Benedictine monk, his historical meditation yields
an incredibly different Christology and Historiography. First, while Steiner has a perennialist
view of the Christian mystery, Casel has a traditionalist view. Casel is completely aware that
Western Civilization (at his time) is experiencing a revival of occult and mystical strains of
thought, but to him, it is a disheartening fact, that the wave of mysticism which is now passing
over our age after the high tide of rationalism neither moves toward not is in any way formed by
the norms of Catholic Christendom.24 Casel clearly rejects Anthroposophy, or would if he knew
about it: this mysticism, rooted in the Orient and developed in most recent times by the
23 Steiner, 41-53.
24 Odo Casel, The Mystery of Christian Worship (New York: Crossroads Publishing, 1962), 50.
25 Casel, 52.
26 Casel, 4.
27 Casel, 53.
28 Casel, 4.
Clearly the manner in which humans may receive Christs mystical bodyvery different
than the Christ-ego of Steineris not through spiritual science or through Anthroposophy but
through the Catholic Church. Casel is dismissive of the anthropocentric nature of new religous
movements: Today the world outside Christianity and the church is looking for mystery; it is
building a new kind of rite in which man worships himself. But through all of this the world will
never reach God. Let us hold fast to the mystery of Christ, the gift the Father sent among us in
the incarnate Word.31 The bride of Christ, his body, is the Church32 , and it is the Lord himself
who acts this mystery, not us. For theocentric Casel, the Church possesses earthly Authority, not
because of political mass, but because the Church preserves the heart of all mystery at her own
heart. As he sacrificed for her, she now takes an active part in his sacrifice, makes it her own, and
is raised thereby from the world to God, and glorified. 33 Casel suggests that we turn attention
29 Casel, 7-8.
30 Casel, 38-39.
31 Casel, 7.
32This is what Casel asserts happens in the Eucharist; the church is his body(page 28). For Casel, since Christ is
no longer visible among us, in St Leo the Greats words, what was visible in the Lord has passed over into the
mysteries. We meet his person, his saving deeds, the workings of grace in the mysteries of his worship. Importantly,
the faithful do not merely meet Christs divine nature, but his person; for Casel (and for the entire Roman Catholic
Church) the congregant meets Christ body and his blood, with his Soul and his Divinity. See Compendium of the
Cathechism of the Catholic Church (Washington, DC: USCCB Publishing, 2006), 84.
In Christian initiation, that is, baptism, rather than having experiential contact with the Infinite Mystery as in
Steiner, the incorporation into Christs mystical body takes place (see Casel, 14.).
33 Casel, 13.
For Steiner, the Church was busy exporting the mystery from its institution, a process
exemplified most strongly by the persecution of the Gnostics. For Casel, the Church was busy
protecting the Mystery from heretics who were trying to keep Christs body for themselves.
Indeed, the church is of its own very essence...a mystery religion, and the mystery language is its
own most rightful possession. 36 For Casel, Mans spiritual development through history is simply
a history of the longing for Christ, the Christ-Event, and the subsequent incarnation of Christ
through the Church to fulfill that longing. History for Casel is not a process, but an illusion made
34 Casel, 50.
35 Steiner, 15.
36 Casel, 34.
37 Casel, 51.
I cannot accurately reflect the complexities of Casel (nor Steiner). Thankfully, the present
essay confines itself to a certain set of concerns, which I have attempted to represent in the chart
below:
Casel Steiner
Christology Fully Man and Fully God, Great Initiate and Sage,
mediator for us through his enacted necessary sacrifice to
own grace and compassion complete the Mysteries
for us.
Direction of Mediation God loves Man, but as Man desires God, and we are
incomplete beings, we are able to become divinized if
unable to love Him back we participate in the Mystery
without gift of Grace of Golgotha; Anthroposophy,
the purifying of the ego
Location of Spiritual The Roman Catholic Church In the self, in noble human
Authority as the Bride of Christ, and endeavor towards the divine,
the gateway to the in wisdom
transcendent
Nature of Mystery Religions Evidence for the ancient The pristine keeper of
longing for Christ, but Wisdom left over from the
inadequate to his revelation. Age of the Sentient Soul in
Gives liturgy its language and the ancient world, corrupted
cultural power. by institutional Christianity
Nature of the Catholic The bride and mystical body The exoteric power structure
Church of Christ and keeper of the that defeated the Gnostics
mystery that He established; thus making the Mystery of
the Eucharist Golgotha unattainable for
most people
38 Casel, 32.
39 Casel, 54-55.
But Anthroposophy cannot be the answer for Casel. Although it is clear that Steiner
desires contact with the divine, and can achieve experiences of magnitude and meaning, his
entire philosophy is an exercise in futility to Casel, because, for Catholics, humans are inadequate
and need mediation through Christ to reach the reality of God, which is not merely transcendent
40 Casel, 3.
41 Casel, 4, 5.
42 Casel, 50.
In other words, the difference between the Christo-centrism of Casel and Steiner comes
down to directionality of mediation. For Steiner, Christ the Man bridges to God. For Casel, God
the Christ bridges to Man. This seemingly small difference between the two vectors, if you will,
of the Man-Christ-God mediation results in a completely different interpretation of history, the
role of the Church, and in the plan for mystical renewal. For Casel, the inner state of the
congregant is irrelevant to the the reception of the mystery; if the layman is aware of the
Mystery, all the better, says Casel, and it is by this awareness that culture has a chance at renewal.
But the Mystery will remain whether the congregation is aware of it or not. Christ has already
enacted the mediation and the Church, his bride and continuing mystical body, operates and
functions with the Grace of God, not the State of Man. Steiner however believes that is the State
of Man that matters for the reception of God, and Christs sacrifice, having provided mediation
to the divine through one mans great Will, has awakened in him (and us! he proclaims) an
exemplar of a perfected ego that raises itself up to God. And so Steiner prescribes not a
participation in a larger structure, but a new process of gnosisSpiritual Science,
Anthroposophy. Through Spiritual Science, Steiner claims that man can once again perfect the
Christ-ego through the Holy Mysteries (represented by the elusive, pagan Grail). But importantly,
it is Man that reaches the inner state (a mental state, signaled by the dependence on psychological
language), and not God.
43Steiner, 26.
The occlusion of the mysteries was partly the fault of the Church destroying the Gnostics, and partly the result of
sensory evolution.
This issue is far too large for the scope of this paper. However, this contrast between Casel
and Steiner raises very important questions about the history of Esoteric discourse, related to its
close relationship to Christian theology, especially in Protestant and post-Protestant
environments.
When the power of mediation between the Divine and the Earthly is relocated, it
accompanies a shift in priorities that can only be described as tectonic. The Catholic Church
claims that God is both transcendent and immanent, and that the immanence is made possible
only through the incarnation of Christ (fully Man and fully God). Thus priority is placed on that
incarnation, which could help explain the almost ferocious devotionthroughout the entire
world of Catholicsto the Vessel of the Incarnation, the Theotokos, the Virgin Mary.
If, however, the Bible is the only and complete revelation of Gods presence to mankind,
as in the theology of John Calvin, there flourishes an obsession with legal process, law, market.
Calvin is so legalistic because to Calvin, the revelation of God, the mediation through which he
and his community are able to have contact through the divine, rests in the Word. The Word
must also be made present to allhence the emphasis on translation to the vernacular. Calvins
strict legalism and the literalism that has resulted from his theology could very well be a direct
result of the relocation of Mediative Authority from the Body to the Word.
What happens when the Word is deconstructed? The mediative authority moves from the
Text to the Reader, to the Self. The modern way of understanding Authority is entirely
democratic, even when it comes to spiritual matters. The ability to mediate between the human
and the divine rests in the Self and its inner states.
Generally, in Protestant churches, the emphasis is on the Scripture, and on preaching. In
Catholic Churches, the emphasis is placed on the Eucharist, the partaking of the mystical body.
In Steiners Anthroposophy, the emphasis is on the process of inner ego-transformation and
perfection. Perhaps this divergence in priorities is the reason behind the reaction to New Age in
the Catholic Church one of mistrust. Casel laments the New Ages separation from the True
44Joseph Ratzinger, Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on Some Aspects of Christian
Meditation (Vatican: Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 1989), section I, paragraph 3. (http://
www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19891015_meditazione-
cristiana_en.html)
45 Pontifical Council for Culture, Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, Jesus Christ the Bearer of the Water of
Life: A Christian Reflection on the New Age (Vatican: Pontifical Council for Culture, Pontifical Council for Interreligious
Dialogue, 2003), section 3.2, Spiritual Narcissism?. (http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/
interelg/documents/rc_pc_interelg_doc_20030203_new-age_en.html)
46 Casel, 9.
Barzun, Jacques. From Dawn to Decadence: 500 Years of Western Cultural Life. New York: Harper-Collins, 2000.
Casel, Odo. The Mystery of Christian Worship. New York: Crossroads Publishing, 1962.
Eisenstadt S.N., ed. Max Weber on Charisma and Institution Building. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
Faivre, Antoine. Access to Western Esotericism. New York: State University of New York Press. 1994.
Godwin, Jocelyn. Atlantis and the Cycles of Time. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions, 2011.
Hanegraaff, Wouter. Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2012.
Pontifical Council for Culture, Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue. Jesus Christ the Bearer of the Water of Life:
A Christian Reflection on the New Age. The Vatican: Pontifical Council for Culture, Pontifical Council for
Interreligious Dialogue, 2003.
Ratzinger, Joseph. Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on Some Aspects of Christian Meditation. The
Vatican: Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 1989.
Steiner, Rudolf. The Holy Grail: The Quest for the Renewal of the Mysteries. Forest Row, East Sussex, United Kingdom:
Sophia Books, 2001.
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Compendium of the Cathechism of the Catholic Church. Washington, DC:
USCCB Publishing, 2006.
von Stuckrad, Kocku. Western Esotericism: A Brief History of Secret Knowledge. London: Equinox, 2005.
Ross, this is terrific - clear, with a carefully delineated scope, and well grounded in the text. It also offers a
useful and interesting perspective on the two views, the traditional eucharistic theology next to the esoteric,
showing the way the way Steiner's views actually map onto the translation of authority to text which you mark
as a protestant characteristic. The points of comparison are felicitous, allowing you to make a solid general
point without dissolving in generalities. I have to suggest it suggest it seems more carefully proofread than
usual as well...
clf
grade for this essay: A; grade for course: A.